Combination of Cytologic Findings and Circulating Tumor DNA From Cerebrospinal Fluid Revealed SCLC Transformation in Patients With Leptomeningeal Metastases of Lung Adenocarcinoma.

Introduction: Transformation to SCLC is a resistance mechanism to tyrosine kinase inhibitor in EGFR-mutated lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD). Nevertheless, the clinical and molecular features of SCLC transformation in LUAD with leptomeningeal metastases (LM) are scarce. Methods: We retrospectively collected 237 patients with NSCLC who underwent lumbar puncture owing to suggestion of LM. All SCLC transformation in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) was confirmed by two experienced pathologists using cytologic evaluation. CSF circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) was tested by next-generation sequencing. Results: Tumor cells in CSF samples were found in 111 patients (111 of 237, 46.8%), and eight cases (eight of 111, 7.2%) were identified as having SCLC cells in CSF. Seven patients carried the EGFR mutation, including four patients with EGFR exon 19 deletion and three patients with EGFR exon 21 L858R mutation. Another patient harbored ERBB2 insertion. Seven of these patients were resistant to targeted therapy. CSF ctDNA analysis reported that TP53 and RB1 mutations were common. The median time from the diagnosis of advanced NSCLC to SCLC transformation found in CSF was 9.7 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 4.0-17.5 mo). The median overall survival since the initial diagnosis of metastatic NSCLC was 15.3 months (95% CI: 1.2-29.4 mo). The median overall survival after SCLC transformation detected in CSF was 5.0 months (95% CI: 4.0-5.9 mo). Conclusions: SCLC transformation may be revealed in CSF by both cytologic evaluation and ctDNA, not just in tissue that underwent rebiopsy. SCLC transformation of CSF is informative for resistance mechanism in patients with LUAD with LM on tyrosine kinase inhibitor progression, which was associated with poor survival.

Tumor immune microenvironment of NSCLC with EGFR exon 20 insertions may predict efficacy of first-line ICI-combined regimen.

OBJECTIVES: Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with exon 20 insertion mutations (ex20ins) of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) were resistant to monotherapy of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI). However, recent reports have shown that the combination of ICI and chemotherapy (ICI-combined regimen) exhibited certain efficacy for NSCLC with EGFR ex20ins. The mechanisms behind this phenomenon have not been thoroughly clarified. Hence, we conducted this study tofind correlations between the tumor immune microenvironment of EGFR ex20ins and the efficacy of ICI-combined regimen. METHODS: We performed single-cell transcriptome sequencing and multiplex immunofluorescence staining (mIF) to investigate the immune microenvironment of NSCLC patients with EGFR ex20ins, L858R, and EGFR wild-type. We analyzed 15 treatment-naïve NSCLC samples utilizing single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq). Another 30 cases of EGFR L858R and 4 cases of wild-type were recruited to compare the immune microenvironment with that of EGFR ex20ins (28 cases) by mIF. RESULTS: We observed that cell components, function and interactions varied between EGFR ex20ins, L858R, and wild-type NSCLC.We discovered similar T cell and CD8+ T cell distributions among groups but found noninferior or even better T cell activation in ex20ins patients. Infiltrating CD8+ FOXP3- T cells were significantly lower in the tumor region of EGFR ex20ins compared to wild-type. T cells from the ex20ins group had a greater tendency to promote cancer cell inflammation and epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) compared to wild-type group. For macrophages, there were more M2-like macrophages in ex20ins patients. M1-like macrophages in ex20ins group produced fewer antitumor cytokines than in other groups. CONCLUSIONS: The immune microenvironment of EGFR ex20ins is more suppressive than that of L858R and wild-type, suggesting that ICI monotherapy may not be sufficient for these patients. ICI-combined regimen might be a treatment option for EGFR ex20ins due to tumor-promoting inflammation and noninferior T cell functions in the immune microenvironment.

Efficacy and Safety of KRASG12C Inhibitor IBI351 Monotherapy in Patients With Advanced NSCLC: Results From a Phase 2 Pivotal Study.

INTRODUCTION: KRAS glycine-to-cysteine substitution at codon 12 (G12C) mutation is a well-recognized and increasingly promising therapeutic target with huge unmet clinical needs in NSCLC patients. IBI351 is a potent covalent and irreversible inhibitor of KRAS G12C. Here, we present the efficacy and safety of IBI351 from an open-label, single-arm, phase 2 pivotal study. METHODS: Eligible patients with NSCLC with KRAS G12C who failed standard therapy were enrolled. IBI351 was orally administered at a dose of 600 mg twice daily. The primary endpoint was confirmed objective response rate assessed by an independent radiological review committee (IRRC) as per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors v1.1. Other endpoints were safety, IRRC-confirmed disease control rate, duration of response, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival. RESULTS: As of December 13, 2023, 116 patients were enrolled (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status 1: 91.4%; brain metastasis: 30.2%; prior treatments with both anti-PD-1 or anti-PD-L1 inhibitors and platinum-based chemotherapy: 84.5%). As per the IRRC assessment, the confirmed objective response rate was 49.1% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 39.7-58.6), and the disease control rate was 90.5% (95% CI: 83.7-95.2). The median duration of response was not reached whereas disease progression or death events occurred in 22 patients (38.6%), and the median PFS was 9.7 months (95% CI: 5.6-11.0). overall survival data was immature. Treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) occurred in 107 patients (92.2%) whereas 48 patients (41.4%) had equal to or higher than grade three TRAEs. Common TRAEs were anemia (44.8%), increased alanine aminotransferase (28.4%), increased aspartate aminotransferase (27.6%), asthenia (26.7%) and presence of protein in urine (25.0%). TRAEs leading to treatment discontinuation occurred in nine patients (7.8%). In biomarker evaluable patients (n = 95), all patients had positive KRAS G12C in tissue whereas 72 patients were blood-positive and 23 were blood-negative for KRAS G12C. Patients with KRAS G12C in both blood and tissue had higher tumor burden at baseline (p < 0.05) and worse PFS (p < 0.05). Tumor mutation profiling identified tumor protein p53 (45.3%), serine/threonine kinase 11 (STK11) (30.5%), and kelch-like ECH-associated protein 1 (21.1%) as the most common genes co-mutated with KRAS G12C. Among 13 genes with mutation frequency equal to or higher than 5%, mutations of six genes (STK11, kelch-like ECH-associated protein 1, phosphatidylinositol-4,5-bisphosphate 3-kinase catalytic subunit gamma, DNA polymerase epsilon, SMAD family member 4, and BMP/retinoic acid-inducible neural-specific protein 3) were significantly associated with worse PFS (p < 0.05). Mutation in STK11 was also found to have a significant association with higher tumor burden at baseline and lower response rate (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: IBI351 monotherapy demonstrated promising and sustained efficacy with manageable safety, supporting its potential as a new treatment option for KRAS G12C-mutant NSCLC.

Lipid-associated macrophages for osimertinib resistance and leptomeningeal metastases in NSCLC.

Leptomeningeal metastases (LMs) remain a devastating complication of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), particularly following osimertinib resistance. We conducted single-cell RNA sequencing on cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) from EGFR-mutant NSCLC with central nervous system metastases. We found that macrophages of LMs displayed functional and phenotypic heterogeneity and enhanced immunosuppressive properties. A population of lipid-associated macrophages, namely RNASE1_M, were linked to osimertinib resistance and LM development, which was regulated by Midkine (MDK) from malignant epithelial cells. MDK exhibited significant elevation in both CSF and plasma among patients with LMs, with higher MDK levels correlating to poorer outcomes in an independent cohort. Moreover, MDK could promote macrophage M2 polarization with lipid metabolism and phagocytic function. Furthermore, malignant epithelial cells in CSF, particularly after resistance to osimertinib, potentially achieved immune evasion through CD47-SIRPA interactions with RNASE1_M. In conclusion, we revealed a specific subtype of macrophages linked to osimertinib resistance and LM development, providing a potential target to overcome LMs.

Tepotinib plus osimertinib in patients with EGFR-mutated non-small-cell lung cancer with MET amplification following progression on first-line osimertinib (INSIGHT 2): a multicentre, open-label, phase 2 trial.

BACKGROUND: Patients with EGFR-mutated non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and MET amplification as a mechanism of resistance to first-line osimertinib have few treatment options. Here, we report the primary analysis of the phase 2 INSIGHT 2 study evaluating tepotinib, a highly selective MET inhibitor, combined with osimertinib in this population. METHODS: This open-label, phase 2 study was conducted at 179 academic centres and community clinics in 17 countries. Eligible patients were aged 18 years or older with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1 and advanced or metastatic EGFR-mutated NSCLC of any histology, with MET amplification by tissue biopsy fluorescence in-situ hybridisation (FISH; MET gene copy number of ≥5 or MET-to-CEP7 ratio of ≥2) or liquid biopsy next-generation sequencing (MET plasma gene copy number of ≥2·3), following progression on first-line osimertinib. Patients received oral tepotinib 500 mg plus oral osimertinib 80 mg once daily. The primary endpoint was independently assessed objective response in patients with MET amplification by central FISH treated with tepotinib plus osimertinib with at least 9 months of follow-up. Safety was analysed in patients who received at least one study drug dose. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03940703 (enrolment complete). FINDINGS: Between Feb 13, 2020, and Nov 4, 2022, 128 patients (74 [58%] female, 54 [42%] male) were enrolled and initiated tepotinib plus osimertinib. The primary activity analysis population included 98 patients with MET amplification confirmed by central FISH, previous first-line osimertinib and at least 9 months of follow-up (median 12·7 months [IQR 9·9-20·3]). The confirmed objective response rate was 50·0% (95% CI 39·7-60·3; 49 of 98 patients). The most common treatment-related grade 3 or worse adverse events were peripheral oedema (six [5%] of 128 patients), decreased appetite (five [4%]), prolonged electrocardiogram QT interval (five [4%]), and pneumonitis (four [3%]). Serious treatment-related adverse events were reported in 16 (13%) patients. Deaths of four (3%) patients were assessed as potentially related to either trial drug by the investigator due to pneumonitis (two [2%] patients), decreased platelet count (one [1%]), respiratory failure (one [1%]), and dyspnoea (one [1%]); one death was attributed to both pneumonitis and dyspnoea. INTERPRETATION: Tepotinib plus osimertinib showed promising activity and acceptable safety in patients with EGFR-mutated NSCLC and MET amplification as a mechanism of resistance to first-line osimertinib, suggesting a potential chemotherapy-sparing oral targeted therapy option that should be further investigated. FUNDING: Merck (CrossRef Funder ID: 10.13039/100009945).

Foritinib in advanced ROS1-rearranged non-small-cell lung cancer in China: a multicentre, open-label, single-arm, phase 2 study.

BACKGROUND: Currently approved targeted treatment for ROS1-rearranged non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has either inadequate intracranial activity or CNS-related toxicities. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of foritinib, a novel ALK and ROS1 inhibitor, in patients with advanced ROS1-rearranged NSCLC. METHODS: This two-part (phase 2a and 2b), multicentre, single-arm, open-label, phase 2 study was done in 29 centres in China. Eligible participants were adults (aged ≥18 years) with histologically or cytologically confirmed ROS1-rearranged, locally advanced or metastatic stage IIIB-IV NSCLC, with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 2 or less. Patients who had previously received no or one ROS1 inhibitor were enrolled into phase 2a, and patients who were naive to ROS1 inhibitor therapy were enrolled into phase 2b cohort 1. Participants in phase 2a received 80, 120, 160, or 210 mg foritinib succinate (foritinib) orally once daily over 21-day cycles; patients in phase 2b received the recommended phase 2 dose of 160 mg. The primary endpoint was objective response rate, assessed by the independent review committee in the full analysis set (ie, all participants who received at least one dose of study treatment). The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least one dose of study treatment and had available safety assessments. This study is ongoing and is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04237805. FINDINGS: Between March 26, 2020, and Dec 29, 2022, 104 patients were enrolled and treated. Six patients who had previously received more than one ROS1 inhibitor were enrolled in phase 2a before a protocol amendment stating that patients in this phase should have received no more than one ROS1 inhibitor; these patients were included in the safety analysis but excluded from the efficacy analysis of the ROS1-inhibitor-pretreated cohort. Therefore, the efficacy analysis set (n=98) included 42 patients from phase 2a (17 who were ROS1 inhibitor naive and 25 who had previously received ROS1 inhibitor) and 56 patients from phase 2b cohort 1. In phase 2a, the objective response rate was 94% (95% CI 71-100; 16 of 17 patients) in patients who were ROS1 inhibitor naive and 40% (21-61; ten of 25) in patients who had previously received ROS1 inhibitor. In phase 2b cohort 1, the objective response rate was 88% (95% CI 76-95; 49 of 56 patients). In a prespecified exploratory analysis in 41 patients with CNS metastases at baseline, the objective response rate was 100% (95% CI 48-100; five of five patients) in patients in phase 2a who were ROS1 inhibitor naive, 40% (16-68; six of 15) in patients in phase 2a who had previously received ROS1 inhibitor, and 90% (70-99; 19 of 21) in patients in phase 2b cohort 1. Grade 3-4 treatment-related adverse events occurred in 33 (32%) of 104 patients; the most common were hyperglycaemia (12 [12%] patients) and electrocardiogram prolonged QT interval (six [6%]). Serious treatment-related adverse events occurred in 11 (11%) patients, with hyperglycaemia (six [6%]) being most common. No treatment-related adverse events led to death. INTERPRETATION: Foritinib showed systemic and intracranial antitumour activity and good tolerability in ROS1-inhibitor-naive patients with ROS1-rearranged NSCLC. Foritinib represents a promising treatment for these patients, especially in those with CNS metastases. FUNDING: Fosun Pharma, Wanbang Biopharmaceuticals, and Guangdong Provincial Key Lab of Translational Medicine in Lung Cancer.

Vebreltinib for Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Harboring c-Met Exon 14 Skipping Mutation: A Multicenter, Single-Arm, Phase II KUNPENG Study.

PURPOSE: The KUNPENG study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of vebreltinib (also known as bozitinib, APL-101, PLB-1001, and CBT-101), a potent and highly selective inhibitor of c-mesenchymal-epithelial transition (MET), in patients with locally advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harboring c-Met alterations. METHODS: This multicenter, multicohort, open-label, single-arm, phase II trial enrolled patients with c-Met dysregulated, locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC from January 2020 to August 2022 across 17 centers. Cohort 1 included patients with MET exon 14 skipping (METex14)-mutant NSCLC who had not previously received MET inhibitors. Participants were administered vebreltinib at a dosage of 200 mg twice a day in 28-day cycles. The primary end point was the objective response rate (ORR), and the key secondary end point was the duration of response (DoR), both evaluated by a blinded independent review committee according to the RECIST version 1.1. RESULTS: As of August 9, 2022, 52 patients had been enrolled in cohort 1, of whom 35 (67.3%) were treatment-naïve. The ORR reached 75% (95% CI, 61.1 to 86). Among treatment-naïve patients, the ORR was 77.1% (95% CI, 59.9 to 89.6), and in previously treated patients, it was 70.6% (95% CI, 44.0 to 89.7). The disease control rate was 96.2%, with a median DoR of 15.9 months, a median progression-free survival of 14.1 months, and a median overall survival of 20.7 months. The most common treatment-related adverse events were peripheral edema (82.7%), QT prolongation (30.8%), and elevated serum creatinine (28.8%). CONCLUSION: Vebreltinib has shown promising efficacy and a favorable safety profile in patients with METex14-mutant NSCLC.

Neoadjuvant sintilimab plus chemotherapy in EGFR-mutant NSCLC: Phase 2 trial interim results (NEOTIDE/CTONG2104).

The clinical efficacy of neoadjuvant immunotherapy plus chemotherapy remains elusive in localized epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Here, we report interim results of a Simon's two-stage design, phase 2 trial using neoadjuvant sintilimab with carboplatin and nab-paclitaxel in resectable EGFR-mutant NSCLC. All 18 patients undergo radical surgery, with one patient experiencing surgery delay. Fourteen patients exhibit confirmed radiological response, with 44% achieving major pathological response (MPR) and no pathological complete response (pCR). Similar genomic alterations are observed before and after treatment without influencing the efficacy of subsequent EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in vitro. Infiltration and T cell receptor (TCR) clonal expansion of CCR8+ regulatory T (Treg)hi/CXCL13+ exhausted T (Tex)lo cells define a subtype of EGFR-mutant NSCLC highly resistant to immunotherapy, with the phenotype potentially serving as a promising signature to predict immunotherapy efficacy. Informed circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) detection in EGFR-mutant NSCLC could help identify patients nonresponsive to neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy. These findings provide supportive data for the utilization of neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy and insight into immune resistance in EGFR-mutant NSCLC.

Circulating Tumor DNA-Guided De-Escalation Targeted Therapy for Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Nonrandomized Controlled Trial.

Importance: Uninterrupted targeted therapy until disease progression or intolerable toxic effects is currently the routine therapy for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) involving driver gene variations. However, drug resistance is inevitable. Objective: To assess the clinical feasibility of adaptive de-escalation tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) treatment guided by circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) for achieving complete remission after local consolidative therapy (LCT) in patients with advanced NSCLC. Design, Setting, and Participants: This prospective nonrandomized controlled trial was conducted at a single center from June 3, 2020, to July 19, 2022, and included 60 patients with advanced NSCLC with driver variations without radiologically detectable disease after TKI and LCT. The median (range) follow-up time was 19.2 (3.8-29.7) months. Data analysis was conducted from December 15, 2022, to May 10, 2023. Intervention: Cessation of TKI treatment and follow-up every 3 months. Treatment was restarted in patients with progressive disease (defined by the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors 1.1 criteria), detectable ctDNA, or elevated carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) levels, whichever manifested first, and treatment ceased if all indicators were negative during follow-up surveillance. Main Outcomes and Measures: Progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary end points were objective response rate, time to next treatment, and overall survival. Results: Among the total study sample of 60 participants (median [range] age, 55 [21-75] years; 33 [55%] were female), the median PFS was 18.4 (95% CI, 12.6-24.2) months and the median (range) total treatment break duration was 9.1 (1.5-28.1) months. Fourteen patients (group A) remained in TKI cessation with a median (range) treatment break duration of 20.3 (6.8-28.1) months; 31 patients (group B) received retreatment owing to detectable ctDNA and/or CEA and had a median PFS of 20.2 (95% CI, 12.9-27.4) months with a median (range) total treatment break duration of 8.8 (1.5-20.6) months; and 15 patients (group C) who underwent retreatment with TKIs due to progressive disease had a median PFS of 5.5 (95% CI, 1.5-7.2) months. For all participants, the TKI retreatment response rate was 96%, the median time to next treatment was 29.3 (95% CI, 25.3-35.2) months, and the data for overall survival were immature. Conclusions and Relevance: The findings of this nonrandomized controlled trial suggest that this adaptive de-escalation TKI strategy for patients with NSCLC is feasible in those with no lesions after LCT and a negative ctDNA test result. This might provide a de-escalation treatment strategy guided by ctDNA for the subset of patients with advanced NSCLC. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03046316.

Neoadjuvant and Adjuvant Treatments for Early Stage Resectable NSCLC: Consensus Recommendations From the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer.

Advances in the multidisciplinary care of early stage resectable NSCLC (rNSCLC) are emerging at an unprecedented pace. Numerous phase 3 trials produced results that have transformed patient outcomes for the better, yet these findings also require important modifications to the patient treatment journey trajectory and reorganization of care pathways. Perhaps, most notably, the need for multispecialty collaboration for this patient population has never been greater. These rapid advances have inevitably left us with important gaps in knowledge for which definitive answers will only become available in several years. To this end, the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer commissioned a diverse multidisciplinary international expert panel to evaluate the current landscape and provide diagnostic, staging, and therapeutic recommendations for patients with rNSCLC, with particular emphasis on patients with American Joint Committee on Cancer-Union for International Cancer Control TNM eighth edition stages II and III disease. Using a team-based approach, we generated 19 recommendations, of which all but one achieved greater than 85% consensus among panel members. A public voting process was initiated, which successfully validated and provided qualitative nuance to our recommendations. Highlights include the following: (1) the critical importance of a multidisciplinary approach to the evaluation of patients with rNSCLC driven by shared clinical decision-making of a multispecialty team of expert providers; (2) biomarker testing for rNSCLC; (3) a preference for neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy for stage III rNSCLC; (4) equipoise regarding the optimal management of patients with stage II between upfront surgery followed by adjuvant therapy and neoadjuvant or perioperative strategies; and (5) the robust preference for adjuvant targeted therapy for patients with rNSCLC and sensitizing EGFR and ALK tumor alterations. Our primary goals were to provide practical recommendations sensitive to the global differences in biology and resources for patients with rNSCLC and to provide expert consensus guidance tailored to the individualized patient needs, goals, and preferences in their cancer care journey as these are areas where physicians must make daily clinical decisions in the absence of definitive data. These recommendations will continue to evolve as the treatment landscape for rNSCLC expands and more knowledge is acquired on the best therapeutic approach in specific patient and disease subgroups.

Neoadjuvant SHR-1701 with or without chemotherapy in unresectable stage III non-small-cell lung cancer: A proof-of-concept, phase 2 trial.

We conducted a proof-of-concept, phase 2 trial to assess neoadjuvant SHR-1701 with or without chemotherapy, followed by surgery or radiotherapy, and then consolidation SHR-1701 in unresectable stage III non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). In the primary cohort of patients receiving neoadjuvant combination therapy (n = 97), both primary endpoints were met, with a post-induction objective response rate of 58% (95% confidence interval [CI] 47-68) and an 18-month event-free survival (EFS) rate of 56.6% (95% CI 45.2-66.5). Overall, 27 (25%) patients underwent surgery; all achieved R0 resection. Among them, 12 (44%) major pathological responses and seven (26%) pathological complete responses were recorded. The 18-month EFS rate was 74.1% (95% CI 53.2-86.7) in surgical patients and 57.3% (43.0-69.3) in radiotherapy-treated patients. Neoadjuvant SHR-1701 with chemotherapy, followed by surgery or radiotherapy, showed promising efficacy with a tolerable safety profile in unresectable stage III NSCLC. Surgical conversion was feasible in a notable proportion of patients and associated with better survival outcomes.

Updated Efficacy and Safety of Lorlatinib in a Phase 2 Study in Chinese Patients With Previously Treated Advanced ALK-Positive Non-small Cell Lung Cancer.

OBJECTIVES: Lorlatinib, a brain-penetrant, third-generation anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) inhibitor, demonstrated robust overall and intracranial antitumor activity in patients with advanced ALK-positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) previously treated with an ALK inhibitor in a global phase 1/2 study (NCT01970865) and a multicenter phase 2 study conducted in China (NCT03909971). We report updated 3-year follow-up data from the phase 2 study. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Chinese patients with locally advanced or metastatic ALK-positive NSCLC that progressed after crizotinib as the only prior ALK inhibitor (cohort 1) or after 1 non-crizotinib ALK inhibitor (cohort 2), were enrolled in the study. All patients received lorlatinib 100 mg once daily. RESULTS: At data cutoff, of 109 enrolled patients, the median duration of follow-up for progression-free survival (PFS) was 35.8 months in cohort 1 (n = 67) and 33.1 months in cohort 2 (n = 42). Median PFS (95% CI) per independent central review was 26.3 months (16.6-35.9) and 5.6 months (2.9-12.4), respectively. The median duration of follow-up for overall survival (OS) was 36.4 months and 37.5 months, respectively. Median OS (95% CI) was not reached (NR; NR-NR) and 21.9 months (11.9-NR), respectively. Median intracranial time to progression (95% CI) was NR (NR-NR) and NR (9.7 months-NR), respectively. No new safety signals emerged with long-term treatment. CONCLUSION: The long-term data confirm robust overall and intracranial clinical activity of lorlatinib, with no new safety signals emerging. These results support using lorlatinib in Chinese patients with previously treated ALK-positive NSCLC with or without brain metastases. CLINICALTRIALS: gov NCT03909971.

Plasma EBV quantification is associated with the efficacy of immune checkpoint blockade and disease monitoring in patients with primary pulmonary lymphoepithelioma-like carcinoma.

Objectives: Primary pulmonary lymphoepithelioma-like carcinoma (PLELC) is a subtype of lung carcinoma associated with the Epstein-Barr virus (EBV). The clinical predictive biomarkers of immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) in PLELC require further investigation. Methods: We prospectively analysed EBV levels in the blood and immune tumor biomarkers of 31 patients with ICB-treated PLELC. Viral EBNA-1 and BamHI-W DNA fragments in the plasma were quantified in parallel using quantitative polymerase chain reaction. Results: Progression-free survival (PFS) was significantly longer in EBNA-1 high or BamHI-W high groups. A longer PFS was also observed in patients with both high plasma EBNA-1 or BamHI-W and PD-L1 ≥ 1%. Intriguingly, the tumor mutational burden was inversely correlated with EBNA-1 and BamHI-W. Plasma EBV load was negatively associated with intratumoral CD8+ immune cell infiltration. Dynamic changes in plasma EBV DNA level were in accordance with the changes in tumor volume. An increase in EBV DNA levels during treatment indicated molecular progression that preceded the imaging progression by several months. Conclusions: Plasma EBV DNA could be a useful and easy-to-use biomarker for predicting the clinical activity of ICB in PLELC and could serve to monitor disease progression earlier than computed tomography imaging.

Lorlatinib Versus Crizotinib in Patients With Advanced ALK-Positive Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: 5-Year Outcomes From the Phase III CROWN Study.

PURPOSE: Lorlatinib improved progression-free survival (PFS) and intracranial activity versus crizotinib in patients with previously untreated, advanced, ALK-positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in the phase III CROWN study. Here, we report long-term outcomes from CROWN after 5 years of follow-up. METHODS: Two hundred ninety-six patients with ALK-positive NSCLC were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive lorlatinib 100 mg once daily (n = 149) or crizotinib 250 mg twice daily (n = 147). This post hoc analysis presents updated investigator-assessed efficacy outcomes, safety, and biomarker analyses. RESULTS: With a median follow-up for PFS of 60.2 and 55.1 months, respectively, median PFS was not reached (NR [95% CI, 64.3 to NR]) with lorlatinib and 9.1 months (95% CI, 7.4 to 10.9) with crizotinib (hazard ratio [HR], 0.19 [95% CI, 0.13 to 0.27]); 5-year PFS was 60% (95% CI, 51 to 68) and 8% (95% CI, 3 to 14), respectively. Median time to intracranial progression was NR (95% CI, NR to NR) with lorlatinib and 16.4 months (95% CI, 12.7 to 21.9) with crizotinib (HR, 0.06 [95% CI, 0.03 to 0.12]). Safety profile was consistent with that in prior analyses. Emerging new ALK resistance mutations were not detected in circulating tumor DNA collected at the end of lorlatinib treatment. CONCLUSION: After 5 years of follow-up, median PFS has yet to be reached in the lorlatinib group, corresponding to the longest PFS ever reported with any single-agent molecular targeted treatment in advanced NSCLC and across all metastatic solid tumors. These results coupled with prolonged intracranial efficacy and absence of new safety signals represent an unprecedented outcome for patients with advanced ALK-positive NSCLC and set a new benchmark for targeted therapies in cancer.

Immunotherapy in resectable NSCLC: Answering the question or questioning the answer?

As immunotherapy makes its way into the perioperative setting, a growing number of clinical trials are expanding the evidence base for resectable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) management. Identifying the optimal treatment pattern-whether it's neoadjuvant, adjuvant, or a combination of both-is a crucial next step, particularly in pinpointing which patients benefit the most. This decision-making process requires a multi-disciplinary treatment team capable of utilizing tissue and plasma genomic testing to inform therapeutic choices. Leveraging the perioperative treatment platform, it remains pivotal to integrate circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) monitoring into clinical trial design efficiently and provide clear guidance on treatment.

IMpower210: A phase III study of second-line atezolizumab vs. docetaxel in East Asian patients with non-small cell lung cancer.

Objective: IMpower210 (NCT02813785) explored the efficacy and safety of single-agent atezolizumab vs. docetaxel as second-line treatment for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in East Asian patients. Methods: Key eligibility criteria for this phase III, open-label, randomized study included age ≥18 years; histologically documented advanced NSCLC per the Union for International Cancer Control/American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system (7th edition); Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1; and disease progression following platinum-based chemotherapy for advanced or metastatic NSCLC. Patients were randomized 2:1 to receive either atezolizumab (1,200 mg) or docetaxel (75 mg/m2). The primary study endpoint was overall survival (OS) in the intention-to-treat (ITT) population with wild-type epidermal growth factor receptor expression (ITT EGFR-WT) and in the overall ITT population. Results: Median OS in the ITT EGFR-WT population (n=467) was 12.3 [95% confidence interval (95% CI), 10.3-13.8] months in the atezolizumab arm (n=312) and 9.9 (95% CI, 7.8-13.9) months in the docetaxel arm [n=155; stratified hazard ratio (HR), 0.82; 95% CI, 0.66-1.03]. Median OS in the overall ITT population was 12.5 (95% CI, 10.8-13.8) months with atezolizumab treatment and 11.1 (95% CI, 8.4-14.2) months (n=377) with docetaxel treatment (n=188; stratified HR, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.71-1.08). Grade 3/4 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) occurred in 18.4% of patients in the atezolizumab arm and 50.0% of patients in the docetaxel arm. Conclusions: IMpower210 did not meet its primary efficacy endpoint of OS in the ITT EGFR-WT or overall ITT populations. Atezolizumab was comparatively more tolerable than docetaxel, with a lower incidence of grade 3/4 TRAEs.

Redoxhigh phenotype mediated by KEAP1/STK11/SMARCA4/NRF2 mutations diminishes tissue-resident memory CD8+ T cells and attenuates the efficacy of immunotherapy in lung adenocarcinoma.

Metabolism reprogramming within the tumor microenvironment (TME) can have a profound impact on immune cells. Identifying the association between metabolic phenotypes and immune cells in lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) may reveal mechanisms of resistance to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). Metabolic phenotypes were classified by expression of metabolic genes. Somatic mutations and transcriptomic features were compared across the different metabolic phenotypes. The metabolic phenotype of LUAD is predominantly determined by reductase-oxidative activity and is divided into two categories: redoxhigh LUAD and redoxlow LUAD. Genetically, redoxhigh LUAD is mainly driven by mutations in KEAP1, STK11, NRF2, or SMARCA4. These mutations are more prevalent in redoxhigh LUAD (72.5%) compared to redoxlow LUAD (17.4%), whereas EGFR mutations are more common in redoxlow LUAD (19.0% vs. 0.7%). Single-cell RNA profiling of pre-treatment and post-treatment samples from patients receiving neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy revealed that tissue-resident memory CD8+ T cells are responders to ICIs. However, these cells are significantly reduced in redoxhigh LUAD. The redoxhigh phenotype is primarily attributed to tumor cells and is positively associated with mTORC1 signaling. LUAD with the redoxhigh phenotype demonstrates a lower response rate (39.1% vs. 70.8%, p = 0.001), shorter progression-free survival (3.3 vs. 14.6 months, p = 0.004), and overall survival (12.1 vs. 31.2 months, p = 0.022) when treated with ICIs. The redoxhigh phenotype in LUAD is predominantly driven by mutations in KEAP1, STK11, NRF2, and SMARCA4. This phenotype diminishes the number of tissue-resident memory CD8+ T cells and attenuates the efficacy of ICIs.

Correlation of distribution characteristics and dynamic changes of gut microbiota with the efficacy of immunotherapy in EGFR-mutated non-small cell lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: The effects of gut microbiota and metabolites on the responses to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in advanced epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) wild-type non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) have been studied. However, their effects on EGFR-mutated (EGFR +) NSCLC remain unknown. METHODS: We prospectively recorded the clinicopathological characteristics of patients with advanced EGFR + NSCLC and assessed potential associations between the use of antibiotics or probiotics and immunotherapy efficacy. Fecal samples were collected at baseline, early on-treatment, response and progression status and were subjected to metagenomic next-generation sequencing and ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry analyses to assess the effects of gut microbiota and metabolites on immunotherapy efficacy. RESULTS: The clinical data of 74 advanced EGFR + NSCLC patients were complete and 18 patients' fecal samples were dynamically collected. Patients that used antibiotics had shorter progression-free survival (PFS) (mPFS, 4.8 vs. 6.7 months; P = 0.037); probiotics had no impact on PFS. Two dynamic types of gut microbiota during immunotherapy were identified: one type showed the lowest relative abundance at the response time point, whereas the other type showed the highest abundance at the response time point. Metabolomics revealed significant differences in metabolites distribution between responders and non-responders. Deoxycholic acid, glycerol, and quinolinic acid were enriched in responders, whereas L-citrulline was enriched in non-responders. There was a significant correlation between gut microbiota and metabolites. CONCLUSIONS: The use of antibiotics weakens immunotherapy efficacy in patients with advanced EGFR + NSCLC. The distribution characteristics and dynamic changes of gut microbiota and metabolites may indicate the efficacy of immunotherapy in advanced EGFR + NSCLC.