Serum Lipoprotein(a) Levels and Their Association with Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease in Japan.

AIMS: To investigate the distribution of lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)) and its association with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) in Japanese patients at high risk for ASCVD using a health insurance database. METHODS: Between July 2013 and June 2021, patients eligible for ASCVD prevention according to the 2017 Japan Atherosclerosis Society (JAS) guidelines with documented Lp(a) test results were extracted from the Medical Data Vision claims database and divided into three groups: primary prevention high-risk (Group I), secondary prevention (Group II) and secondary prevention high-risk (Group III). Data on lipid levels, cardiovascular morbidity risk factors and lipid-lowering treatments were extracted. RESULTS: Of 700,580 patients with documented low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), 2,967 (0.42%) were tested for Lp(a). In 2,170 eligible patients, the median [interquartile range] serum concentration of Lp(a) was 13.9 [7.5-24.6] mg/dL, with 151 patients (7.0%) above the recommended risk threshold of ≥ 50 mg/dL. Lp(a) levels increased with risk across all prevention groups. Being in the highest Lp(a) quintile (Q5) was associated with an increased frequency of ASCVD (28.9% versus 18.9% in the lowest quintile (Q1) for unstable angina; 18.7% versus 10.1% for myocardial infarction; 27.9% versus 17.0% for ischemic stroke). In the secondary prevention groups, the proportion of patients meeting an LDL-C target of ＜70 mg/dL decreased from 30.2% in Q1 to 19.0% in Q5 for Group II and from 32.9% to 16.3% for Group III. CONCLUSIONS: Despite a high prevalence of Lp(a) ≥ 50mg/dL in Japanese patients at high risk for ASCVD, it found that the Lp(a) testing rate was very low.

Clinical Pharmacology of Pemafibrate Extended-release Formulation in Patients with Hypertriglyceridemia-A Phase 2, Multicenter, Active-controlled, Randomized, Single-blind, Crossover study.

AIMS: Efficacy, safety, and pharmacokinetics of the selective PPARα modulator pemafibrate as once-daily extended-release (XR) tablets were compared with those of twice-daily immediate-release (IR) tablets in patients with hypertriglyceridemia. METHODS: A multicenter, randomized, single-blind, active-controlled crossover, phase 2 clinical pharmacology study was performed in patients with hypertriglyceridemia. Patients were randomly assigned to IR 0.2 mg/day, XR 0.4 mg/day, or XR 0.8 mg/day before/after meals (fasted/fed) and treated for a total of eight weeks. The primary endpoint was percentage change in fasting serum triglycerides (TG). RESULTS: Of 63 randomized patients, 60 received the study drug. Patients were 78.3% male, mean age (±SD) 57.5±9.8 years, BMI 25.5±3.7 kg/m2, and fasting TG 221.3±68.1 mg/dL. Fasting serum TG decreased significantly from baseline in all groups (LS mean [95% CI];-43.6 [-47.7, -39.5] % for IR 0.2 mg/day, -41.1 [-45.1, -37.0] % for XR 0.4mg/day, -39.7 [-43.8, -35.6] % for XR 0.8 mg/day), indicating that XR 0.4 and XR 0.8 mg/day were not inferior to IR 0.2 mg/day. TG-lowering effects tended to be stronger for fed than fasted administration. MRTss, tmax, and t1/2 were longer for XR than for IR. Adverse events showed no major inter-group differences: 12.5% (5/40 patients) for IR 0.2, 17.5% (7/40) for XR 0.4, and 20.0% (8/40) for XR 0.8 mg/day. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with hypertriglyceridemia, XR substantially lowered TG at all doses, with maximum effectiveness at 0.4 mg/day, the dose approved in Japan, to a level comparable to IR 0.2 mg/day. There were no safety concerns up to 0.8 mg/day.

Pharmacokinetics and Safety of Pemafibrate in Patients with both Dyslipidemia and Severe Renal Impairment: A Phase 4 Study.

AIMS: Per the package insert, pemafibrate was contraindicated for use in patients with severe renal impairment despite its biliary excretion. To validate this, we evaluated the pharmacokinetics and safety of pemafibrate for 12 weeks in patients with hypertriglyceridemia and renal impairment. METHODS: In this phase 4, multicenter, placebo-controlled, double-blind, parallel-group, comparative study, 21 patients were randomly assigned to pemafibrate 0.2 mg/day or placebo within Groups A (estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR] ＜30 mL/min/1.73m2 without hemodialysis; pemafibrate n=4; placebo, n=2), B (hemodialysis; pemafibrate, n=4; placebo, n=1), and C (eGFR ≥ 30 and ＜60 mL/min/1.73m2 without hemodialysis; pemafibrate, n=8; placebo, n=2) for 12 weeks. Area under the concentration vs time curve within the dosing interval (τ) (AUCτ) of pemafibrate was measured after 12-week administration. RESULTS: The AUCτ (geometric mean) of pemafibrate was 7.333 and 7.991 ng·h/mL in Groups A+B and C, respectively; in Groups A+B to C at 12 weeks, the geometric mean ratio of pemafibrate AUCτ was 0.92 (90% confidence interval [CI]: 0.62, 1.36). The upper limit of the 90% CI was ≤ 2.0 (predetermined criterion). There was no consistent trend in the AUCτ and maximum plasma concentration of pemafibrate with/without statin use. Renal impairment degree did not affect the incidence of adverse events. No safety concerns were observed. CONCLUSION: Pemafibrate repeated administration in patients with severe renal impairment did not increase pemafibrate exposure.

Proteomic Analysis of Human Chylomicron Remnants Isolated by Apolipoprotein B-48 Immunoprecipitation.

AIM: Postprandial hypertriglyceridemia (PHTG) is an independent risk factor for coronary heart diseases. PHTG exhibits accumulation of apoB-48 containing chylomicron remnants (CM-Rs) and apoB-100 containing VLDL remnants (VLDL-Rs), which are both known to be atherogenic. However, unlike VLDL-Rs, structural and functional characterization of CM-Rs remains to be elucidated due to challenges in separating CM-Rs from VLDL-Rs. Recently, we successfully isolated CM-Rs and VLDL-Rs utilizing anti-apoB-48 or apoB-100 specific antibodies. This study aimed to characterize the proteome of CM-Rs along with that of VLDL-Rs. METHODS: Eight healthy subjects were enrolled. Venous blood was drawn 3 hours after high-fat-containing meals. We isolated CM-Rs and VLDL-Rs from sera through combination of ultracentrifugation and immunoprecipitation using apoB-48 or apoB-100 specific antibodies, followed by shotgun proteomic analysis. RESULTS: We identified 42 CM-Rs or VLDL-Rs-associated proteins, including 11 potential newly identified proteins such as platelet basic protein (PPBP) and platelet factor 4, which are chemokines secreted from platelets. ApoA-I, apoA-IV, and clusterin, which are also known as HDL-associated proteins, were significantly more abundant in CM-Rs. Interestingly, apoC-I, which reduces the activity of lipoprotein lipase and eventually inhibits catabolism of remnant proteins, was also more abundant in CM-Rs. Moreover, we identified proteins involved in complement regulation such as complement C3 and vitronectin, and those involved in acute-phase response such as PPBP, serum amyloid A protein 2, and protein S100-A8, in both CM-Rs and VLDL-Rs. CONCLUSIONS: We have firstly characterized the proteome of CM-Rs. These findings may provide an explanation for the atherogenic properties of CM-Rs.

Lessons from PROMINENT and prospects for pemafibrate.

The neutral result of the PROMINENT trial has led to questions about the future for pemafibrate. This commentary discusses possible reasons for the lack of benefit observed in the trial. There were, however, indicators suggesting therapeutic potential in microvascular ischaemic complications associated with peripheral artery disease, with subsequent analysis showing reduction in the incidence of lower extremity ischaemic ulceration or gangrene. Reassurance about the safety of pemafibrate, together with emerging data from PROMINENT and experimental studies, also suggest benefit with pemafibrate in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (alternatively referred to as metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease) and microangiopathy associated with diabetes, which merit further study.

Current Diagnosis and Management of Familial Hypobetalipoproteinemia 1.

Familial hypobetalipoproteinemia (FHBL) 1 is a rare genetic disorder with an autosomal codominant mode of inheritance and is caused by defects in the apolipoprotein (apo) B (APOB) gene that disable lipoprotein formation. ApoB proteins are required for the formation of very low-density lipoproteins (VLDLs), chylomicrons, and their metabolites. VLDLs transport cholesterol and triglycerides from the liver to the peripheral tissues, whereas chylomicrons transport absorbed lipids and fat-soluble vitamins from the intestine. Homozygous or compound heterozygotes of FHBL1 (HoFHBL1) are extremely rare, and defects in APOB impair VLDL and chylomicron secretion, which result in marked hypolipidemia with malabsorption of fat and fat-soluble vitamins, leading to various complications such as growth disorders, acanthocytosis, retinitis pigmentosa, and neuropathy. Heterozygotes of FHBL1 are relatively common and are generally asymptomatic, except for moderate hypolipidemia and possible hepatic steatosis. If left untreated, HoFHBL1 can cause severe complications and disabilities that are pathologically and phenotypically similar to abetalipoproteinemia (ABL) (an autosomal recessive disorder) caused by mutations in the microsomal triglyceride transfer protein (MTTP) gene. Although HoFHBL1 and ABL cannot be distinguished from the clinical manifestations and laboratory findings of the proband, moderate hypolipidemia in first-degree relatives may help diagnose HoFHBL1. There is currently no specific treatment for HoFHBL1. Palliative therapy including high-dose fat-soluble vitamin supplementation may prevent or delay complications. Registry research on HoFHBL1 is currently ongoing to better understand the disease burden and unmet needs of this life-threatening disease with few therapeutic options.

Relationship of interleukin-16 with different phenogroups in acute heart failure with preserved ejection fraction.

AIMS: Interleukin-16 (IL-16) has been reported to mediate left ventricular myocardial fibrosis and stiffening in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). We sought to elucidate whether IL-16 has a distinct impact on pathophysiology and prognosis across different subphenotypes of acute HFpEF. METHODS AND RESULTS: We analysed 211 patients enrolled in a prospective multicentre registry of acute decompensated HFpEF for whom serum IL-16 levels after stabilization were available (53% female, median age 81 [interquartile range 75-85] years). We divided this sub-cohort into four phenogroups using our established clustering algorithm. The study endpoint was all-cause death. Patients were subclassified into phenogroup 1 ('rhythm trouble' [n = 69]), phenogroup 2 ('ventricular-arterial uncoupling' [n = 49]), phenogroup 3 ('low output and systemic congestion' [n = 41]), and phenogroup 4 ('systemic failure' [n = 52]). After a median follow-up of 640 days, 38 patients had died. Among the four phenogroups, phenogroup 2 had the highest IL-16 level. The IL-16 level showed significant associations with indices of cardiac hypertrophy, diastolic dysfunction, and congestion only in phenogroup 2. Furthermore, the IL-16 level had a significant predictive value for all-cause death only in phenogroup 2 (C-statistic 0.750, 95% confidence interval 0.606-0.863, P = 0.017), while there was no association between the IL-16 level and the endpoint in the other phenogroups. CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicated that the serum IL-16 level had a significant association with indices that reflect the pathophysiology and prognosis of HFpEF in a specific phenogroup in acute HFpEF.

Managing hypertriglyceridemia for cardiovascular disease prevention: Lessons from the PROMINENT trial.

BACKGROUND: Numerous epidemiological studies have shown that hypertriglyceridemia is a significant risk factor for cardiovascular diseases (CVD). However, large clinical studies on triglyceride-lowering therapy have yielded inconsistent results. In the current review, we reassess the importance of triglyceride-lowering therapy in preventing CVD based on previous literature and the recently published findings of the PROMINENT trial. METHODS: This narrative review is based on literature and public documents published up to November 2023. RESULTS: Meta-analyses of trials on peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor α agonists and triglyceride-lowering therapy, including the PROMINENT trial, have indicated that triglyceride-lowering therapy can reduce CVD events. Mendelian randomization studies have also indicated that triglyceride is indeed a true risk factor for coronary artery disease, leaving no doubt about its relationship to CVD. Meanwhile, the negative results from the PROMINENT trial were likely due to the insufficient triglyceride-lowering effect, slight increases in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and apolipoprotein B, and the inclusion of mostly high-intensity statin users as target patients. It is unlikely that adverse events counteracted the effectiveness of pemafibrate on outcomes. Additionally, pemafibrate has shown positive effects on non-alcoholic fatty liver disease and peripheral artery disease. CONCLUSION: Although the PROMINENT trial did not demonstrate the significance of pemafibrate as a triglyceride-lowering therapy in a specific population, it does not necessarily negate the potential benefits of treating hypertriglyceridemia in reducing CVD events. It is necessary to explore appropriate populations that could benefit from this therapy, utilize data from the PROMINENT trial and other databases, and validate findings in real-world settings.

Efficacy and Safety of Pemafibrate Extended-Release Tablet: a Phase 3, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Active-Controlled, Parallel-Group Comparison Trial.

AIMS: Pemafibrate, a selective peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor α modulator that lowers serum triglyceride levels and increases high-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels, is approved for treating dyslipidemia as twice-daily immediate-release (IR) tablets. A once-daily extended-release (XR) tablet has also been developed. We aimed to confirm the non-inferiority of XR (0.2 or 0.4 mg/day; once daily) to IR (0.2 mg/day; twice daily) in lowering triglyceride levels in patients with hypertriglyceridemia. METHODS: This phase 3, multicenter, randomized, double-blind study included patients with fasting triglycerides ≥ 200 mg/dL who received IR (0.2 mg/day) or XR (0.2 or 0.4 mg/day). The primary efficacy endpoint was the percentage change in fasting triglyceride levels from baseline to 4, 8, and 12 weeks. Common treatment effects at weeks 4 through 12 were compared between groups using repeated analysis of covariance. RESULTS: In 356 randomized patients, fasting triglyceride levels decreased by 48.0%, 43.8%, and 48.0% with IR 0.2, XR 0.2, and XR 0.4 mg/day, respectively, confirming the non-inferiority of both XR regimens to IR. The proportion of patients who achieved fasting triglycerides ＜150 mg/dL was 45.7%, 37.4%, and 51.7%, while the percentage change of triglycerides in the subgroup with baseline triglycerides ≥ 500 mg/dL was -59.3%, -52.2%, and -66.3% with IR 0.2, XR 0.2, and XR 0.4 mg/day, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: XR (0.2 and 0.4 mg/day) was non-inferior to IR (0.2 mg/day). XR 0.4 mg/day demonstrated a more potent triglyceride-lowering effect than XR 0.2 mg/day and should be considered for patients with high triglyceride levels.

Efficacy, Safety, and Pharmacokinetics of Inclisiran in Japanese Patients: Results from ORION-15.

AIM: To evaluate the efficacy, safety, and pharmacokinetics (PK) of inclisiran in Japanese patients with high cardiovascular risk and elevated low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C). METHODS: ORION-15 was a phase 2, double-blind, placebo-controlled randomized trial. Patients with hypercholesterolemia, including heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (HeFH), were randomized to inclisiran sodium 100, 200, or 300 mg, or placebo and dosed subcutaneously on Days 1, 90, and 270. The primary endpoint was the percentage change from baseline to Day 180 to demonstrate the superiority of inclisiran vs. placebo. Patients who consented to the PK substudy had additional study procedures for blood collection and safety assessment. RESULTS: Overall, 312 patients (mean age, 63.6 years; male, 74.4%; baseline LDL-C, 114.0 mg/dL) were randomized. Baseline characteristics were well balanced among the groups. At Day 180, inclisiran at all doses demonstrated significant LDL-C and proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) reductions (p＜0.0001 for both), which showed a dose-response relationship. The greatest reductions (LDL-C, 65.3%; PCSK9, 79.2%) were with inclisiran sodium 300 mg. At Day 180, ＞86% of the patients receiving inclisiran achieved the Japan Atherosclerosis Society 2017 lipid management targets compared to 8.9% for placebo. The mean (SD) plasma half-life for inclisiran was 6.8 (2.0)-7.6 (0.8) h. The incidence of adverse events with inclisiran was similar to that with placebo. CONCLUSION: Inclisiran sodium 100, 200, and 300 mg demonstrated clinically meaningful and statistically significant LDL-C and PCSK9 reductions at Day 180, which were consistent over 12 months. Inclisiran was effective and well tolerated in Japanese patients with hypercholesterolemia, including HeFH.

Association Between Adequate Serum 25(OH)D Levels and Atherogenic Dyslipidemia in Young Adults.

AIM: This study aimed to investigate the association between vitamin D deficiency and novel biomarkers of atherogenic dyslipidemia among young adults. METHOD: A total of 976 young adults were recruited between 2011 and 2019. Their serum 25(OH)D levels were measured, and lipid profile markers, including low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), low-density lipoprotein triglyceride (LDL-TG), and small-dense low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (sdLDL-C), were assessed as novel biomarkers of atherogenic dyslipidemia. Multivariable linear regression was used to analyze the association between vitamin D levels and lipid profile markers. Odds ratios were calculated to assess the risk of atherogenic dyslipidemia in individuals with serum 25(OH)D levels below 30 ng/mL compared to those with levels above 30 ng/mL. Structural equation modeling (SEM) was employed to explore potential mediation pathways. RESULTS: The study found a significant association between vitamin D levels and lower levels of LDL-C, LDL-TG, sdLDL-C, non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (non-HDL-C), triglycerides, and total cholesterol. Individuals with serum 25(OH)D levels below 30 ng/mL exhibited significantly higher odds ratios for developing atherogenic dyslipidemia in a dose-response pattern compared to those with vitamin D levels above 30 ng/mL. Notably, structural equation modeling (SEM) analysis revealed that vitamin D did not affect atherogenic lipid markers through the mediation of insulin resistance markers or high-sensitivity C-reactive protein. CONCLUSION: This study provides evidence of an association between vitamin D deficiency and atherogenic dyslipidemia in young adults. It further highlights that individuals with serum 25(OH)D levels below 30 ng/mL are at a significantly higher risk of developing atherogenic dyslipidemia in a dose-response manner compared to those with higher vitamin D levels. These findings underscore the potential role of vitamin D in dyslipidemia management and emphasize the importance of maintaining sufficient vitamin D levels for cardiovascular health in young adults.

Clinical Characteristics of Homozygous Familial Hypercholesterolemia in Japan: A Survey Using a National Database.

Background: The studies evaluating patients' characteristics and lipid-lowering therapy for patients with homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (HoFH) are scarce. Objectives: This study aims to evaluate the characteristics of and treatments for patients with HoFH. Methods: This study included 201 patients who were diagnosed with definite or probable HoFH from the National Database of the Japanese Ministry of Health, Labour, and Welfare. Results: The patients' median age at diagnosis was 27 years and exhibited a bimodal distribution. Approximately 70% of patients had coronary artery disease. Regarding genetic backgrounds, mutations in the low-density lipoprotein (LDL) receptor (LDLR) were identified in most of the patients, followed by proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) and double heterozygotes of LDLR. High-intensity statins were introduced to 74% of the patients, lipoprotein apheresis was performed in 21%, and PCSK9 inhibitors were administered to 50%. The mean of LDL cholesterol before and after treatment were 10.1 mmol/L and 3.9 mmol/L, respectively. Patients with coronary artery disease had significantly decreased LDL cholesterol. A quarter of the patients (n = 49, 24%) exhibited valvular diseases, particularly aortic valvular disease (n = 34, 61%). Conclusions: The national epidemiological study of patients with HoFH showed patient's clinical and genetic characteristics and LDL-lowering therapy in Japan. There was considerable diversity in the severity of phenotypes, including LDL cholesterol levels, among patients with HoFH. In Japan, the management of LDL cholesterol in HoFH is still inadequate despite the availability of intensive lipid-lowering therapies.

International Atherosclerosis Society guidance for implementing best practice in the care of familial hypercholesterolaemia.

This contemporary, international, evidence-informed guidance aims to achieve the greatest good for the greatest number of people with familial hypercholesterolaemia (FH) across different countries. FH, a family of monogenic defects in the hepatic LDL clearance pathway, is a preventable cause of premature coronary artery disease and death. Worldwide, 35 million people have FH, but most remain undiagnosed or undertreated. Current FH care is guided by a useful and diverse group of evidence-based guidelines, with some primarily directed at cholesterol management and some that are country-specific. However, none of these guidelines provides a comprehensive overview of FH care that includes both the lifelong components of clinical practice and strategies for implementation. Therefore, a group of international experts systematically developed this guidance to compile clinical strategies from existing evidence-based guidelines for the detection (screening, diagnosis, genetic testing and counselling) and management (risk stratification, treatment of adults or children with heterozygous or homozygous FH, therapy during pregnancy and use of apheresis) of patients with FH, update evidence-informed clinical recommendations, and develop and integrate consensus-based implementation strategies at the patient, provider and health-care system levels, with the aim of maximizing the potential benefit for at-risk patients and their families worldwide.

Novel Selective PPARα Modulator Pemafibrate for Dyslipidemia, Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease (NAFLD), and Atherosclerosis.

Statins, the intestinal cholesterol transporter inhibitor (ezetimibe), and PCSK9 inhibitors can reduce serum LDL-C levels, leading to a significant reduction in cardiovascular events. However, these events cannot be fully prevented even when maintaining very low LDL-C levels. Hypertriglyceridemia and reduced HDL-C are known as residual risk factors for ASCVD. Hypertriglyceridemia and/or low HDL-C can be treated with fibrates, nicotinic acids, and n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids. Fibrates were demonstrated to be PPARα agonists and can markedly lower serum TG levels, yet were reported to cause some adverse effects, including an increase in the liver enzyme and creatinine levels. Recent megatrials of fibrates have shown negative findings on the prevention of ASCVD, which were supposed to be due to their low selectivity and potency for binding to PPAR α. To overcome the off-target effects of fibrates, the concept of a selective PPARα modulator (SPPARMα) was proposed. Kowa Company, Ltd. (Tokyo, Japan), has developed pemafibrate (K-877). Compared with fenofibrate, pemafibrate showed more favorable effects on the reduction of TG and an increase in HDL-C. Fibrates worsened liver and kidney function test values, although pemafibrate showed a favorable effect on liver function test values and little effect on serum creatinine levels and eGFR. Minimal drug-drug interactions of pemafibrate with statins were observed. While most of the fibrates are mainly excreted from the kidney, pemafibrate is metabolized in the liver and excreted into the bile. It can be used safely even in patients with CKD, without a significant increase in blood concentration. In the megatrial of pemafibrate, PROMINENT, for dyslipidemic patients with type 2 diabetes, mild-to-moderate hypertriglyceridemia, and low HDL-C and LDL-C levels, the incidence of cardiovascular events did not decrease among those receiving pemafibrate compared to those receiving the placebo; however, the incidence of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease was lower. Pemafibrate may be superior to conventional fibrates and applicable to CKD patients. This current review summarizes the recent findings on pemafibrate.

Association of Serum Levels of Cholesterol Absorption and Synthesis Markers with the Presence of Cardiovascular Disease: The CACHE Study CVD Analysis.

AIM: Serum levels of cholesterol absorption and synthesis markers have been associated with cardiovascular risk in the United States and European countries. In this study, we examined the relevance of these biomarkers and the presence of cardiovascular disease (CVD) in Japanese individuals. METHODS: The CACHE consortium, comprising of 13 research groups in Japan possessing data on campesterol, an absorption marker, and lathosterol, a synthesis marker measured by gas chromatography, compiled the clinical data using the REDCap system. RESULTS: Among the 2,944 individuals in the CACHE population, those with missing campesterol or lathosterol data were excluded. This cross-sectional study was able to analyze data from 2,895 individuals, including 339 coronary artery disease (CAD) patients, 108 cerebrovascular disease (CeVD) patients, and 88 peripheral artery disease (PAD) patients. The median age was 57 years, 43% were female, and the median low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and triglyceride levels were 118 mg/dL and 98 mg/dL, respectively. We assessed the associations of campesterol, lathosterol, and the ratio of campesterol to lathosterol (Campe/Latho ratio) with the odds of CVD using multivariable-adjusted nonlinear regression models. The prevalence of CVD, especially CAD, showed positive, inverse, and positive associations with campesterol, lathosterol, and the Campe/Latho ratio, respectively. These associations remained significant even after excluding individuals using statins and/or ezetimibe. The associations of the cholesterol biomarkers with PAD were determined weaker than those with CAD. Contrarily, no significant association was noted between cholesterol metabolism biomarkers and CeVD. CONCLUSION: This study showed that both high cholesterol absorption and low cholesterol synthesis biomarker levels were associated with high odds of CVD, especially CAD.

Achievement Rates for Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Goals in Patients at High Risk of Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease in a Real-World Setting in Japan.

AIMS: The study aimed to investigate low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) goal achievement rates in patients receiving LDL-C-lowering therapy using recent real-world data, following the 2017 revision of the Japan Atherosclerosis Society Guidelines for Prevention of Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Diseases (JAS GL2017). METHODS: Patients with documented LDL-C test results were extracted from the Medical Data Vision claims database between July 2018 and June 2021 and divided into three groups according to JAS GL2017: primary prevention high risk (Group I, LDL-C goal ＜120 mg/dL), secondary prevention (Group II, LDL-C goal ＜100 mg/dL), and secondary prevention high risk (Group III, LDL-C goal ＜70 mg/dL). RESULTS: The mean LDL-C value was 108.7 mg/dL (n=125,235), 94.4 mg/dL (n=57,910), and 90.6 mg/dL (n=33,850) in Groups I, II, and III, respectively. Intensive statin monotherapy (pitavastatin, rosuvastatin, or atorvastatin) was the most frequently prescribed lipid-lowering treatment (21.6%, 30.8%, and 42.7% in Groups I, II, and III, respectively), followed by ezetimibe (2.5%, 7.1%, and 8.5% in Groups I, II, and III, respectively). LDL-C goals were achieved by 65.5%, 60.6%, and 25.4% of patients overall in Groups I, II, and III, respectively. Achievement rates were 83.9%, 75.3%, and 29.5% in patients prescribed intensive statin monotherapy and 82.3%, 86.4%, and 46.4% in those prescribed statin and ezetimibe combinations in Groups I, II, and III, respectively. In Group III, the proportion of patients with familial hypercholesterolemia prescribed statin and ezetimibe combinations achieving LDL-C goals was low (32.5%). CONCLUSIONS: The proportion of patients achieving LDL-C goals for secondary prevention in the high-risk group remains low even with statin and ezetimibe combination therapy.

XCR1+ conventional dendritic cell-induced CD4+ T helper 1 cell activation exacerbates cardiac remodeling after ischemic myocardial injury.

Cardiac remodeling has no established therapies targeting inflammation. CD4+ T-cell subsets have been reported to play significant roles in healing process after ischemic myocardial injury, but their detailed mechanisms of activation remain unknown. To explore immune reactions during cardiac remodeling, we applied a non-surgical model of coronary heart disease (CHD) induced by a high-fat diet (HFD-CHD) in SR-BI-/-/ApoeR61h/h mice. Flow cytometry analyses throughout the period of progressive cardiac dysfunction revealed that CD4+ T Helper 1 (Th1) cells were predominantly activated in T-cell subsets. Probucol was reported to attenuate cardiac dysfunction after coronary artery ligation model (ligation-MI) in rats. To determine whether probucol suppress cardiac remodeling after HFD-CHD, we treated SR-BI-/-/ApoeR61h/h mice with probucol. We found treatment with probucol in HFD-CHD mice reduced cardiac dysfunction, with attenuated activation of Th1 cells. RNA-seq analyses revealed that probucol suppressed the expression of CXCR3, a Th1-related chemokine receptor, in the heart. XCR1+ cDC1 cells, which highly expresses the CXCR3 ligands CXCL9 and CXCL10, were predominantly activated after HFD-CHD. XCR1+ cDC1 lineage skewing of pre-DC progenitors was observed in bone marrow, with subsequent systemic expansion of XCR1+ cDC1 cells after HFD-CHD. Activation of CXCR3+ Th1 cell and XCR1+ cDC1 cells was also observed in ligation-MI. Notably, post-MI depletion of XCR1+ cDC1 cells suppressed CXCR3+ Th1 cell activation and prevented cardiac dysfunction. In patient autopsy samples, CXCR3+ Th1 and XCR1+ cDC1 cells infiltrated the infarcted area. In this study, we identified a critical role of XCR1+ cDC1-activated CXCR3+ Th1 cells in ischemic cardiac remodeling.

Serum Values of Cholesterol Absorption and Synthesis Biomarkers in Japanese Healthy Subjects: The CACHE Study HEALTHY Analysis.

AIM: Blood cholesterol absorption and synthesis biomarkers predict cardiovascular risk. This study aimed to determine the values of serum non-cholesterol sterol markers [lathosterol (Latho), campesterol (Campe), and sitosterol (Sito)] in healthy individuals and factors affecting these markers. METHODS: The CACHE Consortium compiled clinical data, including serum Latho (cholesterol synthesis marker), and Campe and Sito (cholesterol absorption markers), by a gas chromatography method in 2944 individuals. Healthy subjects were selected by excluding those with prior cardiovascular disease, diabetes mellitus, hypertension, chronic kidney disease, familial hypercholesterolemia, sitosterolemia, current smokers, those with low (＜17 kg/m2) or high (≥ 30 kg/m2) body mass index (BMI), and those with treatment for dyslipidemia or hyperuricemia. Nonlinear regression stratified by sex was used to examine the associations of cholesterol metabolism markers with age, BMI, and serum lipid levels. RESULTS: Of 479 individuals selected, 59.4% were female; the median age was 48 years in females and 50 years in males. The three markers showed positively skewed distributions, and sex differences were present. Age was associated positively with Latho, inversely with Campe, but not significantly with Sito. BMI was associated positively with Latho, but not significantly with Campe or Sito. High-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) was positively associated with Campe and Sito, but not significantly with Latho. Non-HDL-C was positively associated with the three markers. CONCLUSION: Our study results in the healthy subjects help to interpret the non-cholesterol sterol markers for cardiovascular risk assessment in patients with cardiovascular risk factors.

Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Pediatric Familial Hypercholesterolemia 2022.

As atherosclerosis begins in childhood, early diagnosis and treatment of familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) is considered necessary. The basic diagnosis of pediatric FH (under 15 years of age) is based on hyper-low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterolemia and a family history of FH; however, in this guideline, to reduce overlooked cases, "probable FH" was established. Once diagnosed with FH or probable FH, efforts should be made to promptly provide lifestyle guidance, including diet. It is also important to conduct an intrafamilial survey, to identify family members with the same condition. If the level of LDL-C remains above 180 mg/dL, drug therapy should be considered at the age of 10. The first-line drug should be statin. Evaluation of atherosclerosis should be started using non-invasive techniques, such as ultrasound. The management target level is an LDL-C level of less than 140 mg/dL. If a homozygous FH is suspected, consult a specialist and determine the response to pharmacotherapy with evaluating atherosclerosis. If the response is inadequate, initiate lipoprotein apheresis as soon as possible.