Availability of genome-matched therapy based on clinical practice.

BACKGROUND: Comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) provides new opportunities for patients with advanced cancer to receive genome-matched therapies, but the availability rate of these remains low. We reviewed our CGP cases and suggested possible strategies to improve the current status from a clinical perspective. METHODS: Druggable genomic alterations and barriers to accessing genome-matched therapies were investigated in 653 patients with 30 various types of cancers who underwent CGP. RESULTS: While the availability rate of genome-matched therapies as a whole was 9.5%, CGP was useful in some cancer types. Patients with thyroid cancer and lung cancer harbored druggable genomic alterations at high rates, while sarcoma rarely harbored these alterations (100%, 76%, and 15.2%, respectively). In contrast, the availability rate of genome-matched therapies was highest in patients with sarcoma and head and neck cancer (HNC) (60% and 40%, respectively). One hundred thirteen patients (63.5%) had multiple barriers to accessing genome-matched therapy. Of 178 patients, 21 patients (11.8%) could not be considered for genome-matched therapies solely because of the deterioration of their performance status. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated the usefulness of CGP for patients with sarcoma and HNC in addition to lung cancer in clinical practice. Performing CGP at the front line has the potential to improve the availability of genome-matched therapy.

Prognostic impact of cancer genomic profile testing for advanced or metastatic solid tumors in clinical practice.

Cancer genomic profile (CGP) testing, which is covered by the national health insurance system in Japan, has been introduced as a routine clinical practice. However, the effects of CGP testing on prognoses remain unclear. Drug accessibility rates and prognoses after CGP testing were retrospectively investigated in 713 patients who underwent CGP testing examined by our molecular tumor board between November 2019 and October 2022,. Overall survival (OS) was examined using the log-rank test and the Kaplan-Meier method. The median age of patients (326 males and 387 females) was 58 years (12-85 years). CGP testing revealed one or more gene mutations in 681 cases (95.5%), among which actionable gene mutations were detected in 439 (61.6%). Although treatment options were recommended for 285 cases (40.0%) by the molecular tumor board, only 45 received treatment based on their gene mutations. During the median observation period of 8.6 months, 351 (49.2%) patients died of the exacerbation of existing diseases. No significant differences were observed in OS between patients treated with and without genomically matched therapy (p = 0.285). According to clinical responses to treatment based on gene mutations, median OS was significantly longer in patients who achieved partial response and stable disease (26.5 months; 95% CI 14.4-38.6) than in those with progressive disease and not evaluated (9.8 months; 95% CI 5.8-13.8, p = 0.013). Responses to treatment based on gene mutations may improve prognoses, and it is important to increase the drug accessibility rate after CGP testing.

Evaluation of an inflammation-based score for identification of appropriate patients for comprehensive genomic profiling.

Performance status (PS) is widely used as an assessment of general condition in patients before performing comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP). However, PS scoring is dependent on each physician, and there is no objective and universal indicator to identify appropriate patients for CGP. Overall, 263 patients were scored using the modified Glasgow prognostic score (mGPS) from 0 to 2 based on the combination of serum albumin and c-reactive protein (CRP): 0, albumin ≥ 3.5 g/dl and CRP ≤ 0.5 mg/dl; 1, albumin < 3.5 g/dl or CRP > 0.5 mg/dl; and 2, albumin < 3.5 g/dl and CRP > 0.5 mg/dl. Overall survival was compared between mGPS 0-1 and mGPS 2 groups. The prognosis of patients with PS 0-1 and mGPS 2 was also evaluated. Thirty-nine patients (14.8%) were mGPS 2. Patients with mGPS 2 had significant shorter survival (14.7 months vs 4.6 months, p < 0.01). Twenty-eight patients were PS 0-1 and mGPS 2, and their survival was also short (5.6 months). Evaluation of mGPS is a simple and useful method for identifying patients with adequate prognosis using CGP.

Druggable gene alterations in Japanese patients with rare malignancy.

Without a current standard of care, patients with rare malignancy are subjected to precision oncology with next-generation sequencing to identify a course of treatment. We sought to establish the clinical relevance of comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) among patients with rare malignancy. Rare malignancy was defined using the Rare Cancers in Europe definition (<6 cases per 100,000 individuals). We analyzed gene mutations, fusions, tumor mutational burden (TMB), and microsatellite instability (MSI) status. Level A gene alterations, categorized using Clinical Interpretations of Variants in Cancer and MD Anderson Knowledge Base for Precision Oncology, were considered druggable. Rare malignancy accounted for 149 (45%) cases, with female genital cancers (32%) most common. Among the rare malignancy cases, we identified a lower frequency of mutation in TP53 (41% vs. 60%, P<0.001), KRAS (13% vs. 43%, P<0.001) and APC (3% vs. 25%, P<0.001), and a higher frequency of ARID1A mutation (14% vs. 6%, P=0.03), as compared with common malignancies. TMB-high and MSI-high cases were found in 8% and 2% of cases, respectively. Druggable alterations were detected in 37 patients with rare malignancy; this percentage tended to be higher than that for patients with common malignancies (25% vs. 17%, P=0.08). Common druggable alterations were BRAF V600E, ERBB2 amplification, PIK3CA E542K, and BRCA1/2 variant. Five of the 37 patients with druggable alterations received genome-driven treatment. There was no significant difference in overall survival between the rare and common malignancy groups. Our results provide clues for future clinical development and treatment success among Japanese patients with rare cancers.

Assessment of a cancer genomic profile test for patients with metastatic breast cancer.

Comprehensive cancer genomic profile (CGP) tests are being implemented under Japanese universal health insurance system. However, the clinical usefulness of CGP test for breast cancer patients has not been evaluated. Of the 310 patients who underwent CGP testing at our institution between November 2019 and April 2021, 35 patients with metastatic breast cancer whose treatment strategy was discussed by our molecular tumor board within the study period were investigated after exclusion of 2 cases that could not be analyzed. The turn-around time, drug accessibility, and germline identification detection were evaluated. The subtype was luminal in 20 patients (57.1%), triple-negative in 12 patients (34.3%), and luminal-HER2 in 3 patients (8.6%). Actionable gene mutations were detected in 30 patients (85.7%), and 7 patients (20.0%) were recommended for clinical trial participation, with the drug administered to 2 patients (5.7%). Three patients (8.6%) died due to disease progression before the test results were disclosed. We report the results of an initial assessment of the utility of CGP testing for patients with metastatic breast cancer under Japanese universal health insurance system. Conducting CGP tests at a more appropriate time could provide patients with greater benefit from treatments based on their specific gene mutations.

[Direct conversion from low-dose morphine to transdermal fentanyl: efficacy for cancer pain and quality of life].

The efficacy and QOL in a cancer pain patient who converted to transdermal fentanyl from low-dose morphine (n=5) or high-dose morphine (n=5) were retrospectively compared. Cancer pain control was evaluated by visual analogue scales (VAS) score. Patients switched from low-dose morphine demonstrated significantly better scales. The number of morphine rescues was also significantly less in the low-dose conversion group. In conclusion, conversion from low-dose morphine is useful for cancer pain control from the aspect of efficacy and QOL.