Lidocaine spray alone is similar to spray plus viscous solution for pharyngeal observation during transoral endoscopy: a clinical randomized trial.

Background and study aims It is important to examine the pharynx during upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. Pharyngeal anesthesia using topical lidocaine is generally used as pretreatment. In Japan, lidocaine viscous solution is the anesthetic of choice, but lidocaine spray is applied when the former is considered insufficient. However, the relationship between the extent of pharyngeal anesthesia and accuracy of observation is unclear. We compared the performance of lidocaine spray alone versus lidocaine spray combined with lidocaine viscous solution for pharyngeal observation during transoral endoscopy. Patients and methods In this prospective, double-blinded, randomized clinical trial conducted between January and March 2015, 327 patients were randomly assigned to lidocaine spray alone (spray group, n = 157) or a combination of spray and viscous solution (combination group, n = 170). We compared the number of pharyngeal observable sites (non-inferiority test), pain by visual analogue scale, observation time, and the number of gag reflexes between the two groups. Results The mean number of images of suitable quality taken at the observable pharyngeal sites in the spray group was 8.33 (95 % confidence interval [CI]: 7.94 - 8.72) per patient, and 8.77 (95 % CI: 8.49 - 9.05) per patient in the combination group. The difference in the number of observable pharyngeal sites was - 0.44 (95 % CI: - 0.84 to - 0.03, P = 0.01). There were no differences in pain, observation time, or number of gag reflexes between the 2 groups. Subgroup analysis of the presence of sedation revealed no differences between the two groups for the number of pharyngeal observation sites and the number of gag reflexes. However, the number of gag reflexes was higher in the spray group compared to the combination group in a subgroup analysis that looked at the absence of sedation. Conclusions Lidocaine spray for pharyngeal anesthesia was not inferior to lidocaine spray and viscous solution in terms of pharyngeal observation. It was considered that lidocaine viscous solution was unnecessary for pharyngeal observation. UMIN000016073.

[A case of AL amyloidosis due to multiple myeloma presenting with a huge gastric submucosal hematoma during anticoagulant therapy].

A 43-year-old woman who had received anticoagulant therapy for atrial fibrillation for 2 years was admitted to our hospital with hematemesis. Endoscopy revealed a huge submucosal hematoma in the antrum of the stomach. Repeat endoscopy on day 6 showed that the submucosal hematoma had developed into a giant ulcer. Gastric mucosal biopsy and general examination confirmed a diagnosis of AL amyloidosis due to multiple myeloma. Although patients with cardiac involvement of AL amyloidosis often require anticoagulant therapy, gastrointestinal bleeding may occur. Therefore, the potential benefits of anticoagulation must be carefully weighed against the risk of hemorrhage.

The pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of tandospirone in rats exposed to conditioned fear stress.

The 5-HT1, agonist tandospirone is generally thought to have a weak anxiolytic effect with a slow onset of action. Our recent clinical study suggested that a comparatively high dose of tandospirone has excellent anxiolytic efficacy and is without significant adverse effects. The present study was designed to clarify the relationship between the anxiolytic effect of tandospirone and its plasma and brain concentrations. The anxiolytic effect was estimated by determining the conditioned fear stress-induced freezing behavior in rats after tandospirone administration. Obvious correlations between anxiolytic effect and brain concentration of tandospirone were observed 0.5 and 4 h after tandospirone administration, while the anxiolytic effect was dependent on the plasma concentration of at 0.5 h but not 4 h after tandospirone administration. The plasma concentration was significantly correlated with the brain concentration. These findings suggest that the potency of the anxiolytic effect is dependent on both the plasma and brain concentration.