Safety and immunogenicity of a SARS-CoV-2 Gamma variant RBD-based protein adjuvanted vaccine used as booster in healthy adults.

A Gamma Variant RBD-based aluminum hydroxide adjuvanted vaccine called ARVAC CG was selected for a first in human clinical trial. Healthy male and female participants (18-55 years old) with a complete COVID-19-primary vaccine scheme were assigned to receive two intramuscular doses of either a low-dose or a high-dose of ARVAC CG. The primary endpoint was safety. The secondary objective was humoral immunogenicity. Cellular immune responses were studied as an exploratory objective. The trial was prospectively registered in PRIISA.BA (Registration Code 6564) and ANMAT and retrospectively registered in ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05656508). Samples from participants of a surveillance strategy implemented by the Ministry of Health of the Province of Buenos Aires that were boosted with BNT162b2 were also analyzed to compare with the booster effect of ARVAC CG. ARVAC CG exhibits a satisfactory safety profile, a robust and broad booster response of neutralizing antibodies against the Ancestral strain of SARS-CoV-2 and the Gamma, Delta, Omicron BA.1 and Omicron BA.5 variants of concern and a booster effect on T cell immunity in individuals previously immunized with different COVID-19 vaccine platforms.

Pharmacokinetics of a new fixed-dose combination of candesartan cilexetil, hydrochlorothiazide, and rosuvastatin in healthy adult subjects.

BACKGROUND: A fixed-dose combination (FDC) of candesartan cilexetil, hydrochlorothiazide and rosuvastatin (CC/HCTZ/RSV) has been developed to enhance patient compliance in the primary prevention of cardiovascular diseases. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate if the combination of the product components in the new FDC capsule formulation affects their respective pharmacokinetic and in vitro dissolution patterns. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In vitro dissolution profiles were compared in USP-43 and in biorelevant dissolution media. In vivo comparisons were obtained in a randomized, open-label, single-dose, two-treatment, two-way crossover study in 24 healthy subjects. During each treatment period, subjects received the test formulation (FDC hard capsule containing CC/HCTZ/RSV) or the reference formulation (co-administration of a FDC CC/HCTZ tablet and a RSV tablet). Plasma samples were collected periodically over 48 hours post-dose. Safety and tolerability were assessed. RESULTS: Dissolution profiles of all active drugs in the Test (capsule) and Reference Products (as tablets) were within the tolerance dissolution criteria of USP-43 conditions. HCTZ dissolution profiles were closely similar whereas those for RSV and CC did not match at specific pHs. In the pharmacokinetic study, the 90% confidence intervals (CIs) for the geometric least-square mean ratios of Cmax, AUC0-last, and AUC0-inf were 0.95 - 1.18, 0.95 - 1.15 and 0.95 - 1.13 (CC); 0.91 - 1.10, 0.96 - 1.08, and 0.96 - 1.09 (HCTZ) and 0.82 - 1.23, 0.81 - 1.13, and 0.82 - 1.12 (RSV), respectively. All adverse events were mild. CONCLUSION: The new FDC product (Sinlip Prevent), a stable FDC hard capsule, was bioequivalent (similar pharmacokinetics) when compared to the co-administration of the components and may be considered as a suitable and simplified medication for cardiovascular disease management.

Clinical investigation of the biopharmaceutical characteristics of nifurtimox tablets - Implications for quality control and application.

Nifurtimox is approved in Chagas disease and has been used in endemic countries since the 1960s. Nifurtimox, available as a 120 mg tablet, is administered with food typically three times daily, and dose is adjusted for age and bodyweight. Accurately or reproducibly fragmenting the 120 mg tablet for dose adjustment in young children and those with low bodyweight is problematic. Based on the existing tablet formulation, new nifurtimox 30 mg and 120 mg tablets have been developed in a format that can be divided accurately into 15 mg and 60 mg fragments. In adults with chronic Chagas disease, we investigated whether nifurtimox bioavailability is affected by tablet dissolution rate, and whether different diets affect nifurtimox bioavailability. In an open-label, three-period cross-over study (n=36; ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03350295), patients randomly received three 30 mg tablet formulations (slow, medium, or fast dissolution; a 4 × 30 mg dose of one formulation per period). In an open-label, four-period cross-over study (n=24; ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03334838) patients randomly fasted or received one of three meal types (high-fat/high-calorie, low-fat, dairy-based) before ingesting nifurtimox (a 4 × 30 mg dose per period). Acceptance criteria for no difference between groups were 90% confidence intervals (CIs) of exposure ratios in the range 0.8-1.25. Nifurtimox bioavailability was unaffected by tablet dissolution kinetics. Ratios of area under the curve at final assessment (AUC(0-tlast) [90% CI]) were: fast/medium dissolution, 1.061 (0.990-1.137); slow/medium dissolution, 0.964 (0.900-1.033); fast/slow dissolution, 1.100 (1.027-1.179). Compared with a fasting state, nifurtimox bioavailability increased by 73% after a high-fat/high-calorie meal (AUC(0-tlast) ratio [90% CI], 1.732 [1.581-1.898]); smaller increases were seen with the other meal types (low-fat: 1.602 [1.462-1.755]; dairy-based: 1.340 [1.222-1.468]). Although type of diet can affect bioavailability, taking nifurtimox with food is most important.

Biopharmaceutical Characteristics of Nifurtimox Tablets for Age- and Body Weight-Adjusted Dosing in Patients With Chagas Disease.

Treatment of Chagas disease with nifurtimox requires age- and body weight-adjusted dosing, resulting in complex dosing instructions. Appropriate formulations are needed for precise and compliant dosing, especially in pediatric patients. We characterized the biopharmaceutical features of a standard nifurtimox 120-mg tablet and a 30-mg tablet developed to improve dose accuracy. Two open-label, randomized crossover studies were conducted in adult outpatients with Chagas disease. One study investigated whether 4 × 30-mg tablets and 1 × 120-mg tablet were bioequivalent and whether tablets can be administered as an aqueous slurry without affecting bioavailability. The second study investigated the effect of a high-calorie/high-fat diet versus fasting on the absorption of nifurtimox after a single 4 × 30-mg dose. Interventions were equivalent if the 90% confidence interval (CI) of their least-squares (LS) mean ratios for both AUC0-tlast and Cmax were in the range of 80%-125%. The 4 × 30-mg and 1 × 120-mg tablet doses were bioequivalent (AUC0-tlast : LS mean ratio, 104.7%; 90%CI, 99.1%-110.7%; Cmax : LS mean ratio, 101.7%; 90%CI, 89.4%-115.6%; n = 24). Exposure when giving the 4 × 30-mg dose as a slurry or as tablets was comparable, with an AUC0-tlast ratio of 93.2% (84.2%-103.1%; n = 12) and a slightly decreased Cmax ratio for the slurry of 76.5% (68.8%-85.1%). Food improved the bioavailability of nifurtimox substantially (AUC0-tlast ratiofed/fasted , 172%; 90%CI, 154%-192%; Cmax ratiofed/fasted , 168%; 90%CI, 150%-187%). The data indicate that the 30- and 120-mg tablets are suitable for dosing adult and pediatric patients accurately; nifurtimox should be administered under fed conditions.

Bioequivalence study of two oral tablet formulations containing saquinavir mesylate boosted with ritonavir in healthy male subjects.

Saquinavir (SAQ) mesylate (CAS 149845-06-7) is a potent inhibitor of the HIV-1 protease indicated in combination with other antiretrovirals for the management of HIV-1 infection. The objective of this study was to compare rate and extent of absorption and to assess the bioequivalence between a new pharmaceutical equivalent tablet formulation containing 500 mg of SAQ mesylate and the innovator film coated tablet formulation. A randomized, single-center, open-label, two-treatment, two-sequence, three-period, replicated crossover bioequivalence study in 40 healthy male subjects was conducted. All subjects received 100 mg ritonavir (CAS 155213-67-5) twice daily for a run-in period of 3 days before treatment. Dosing was separated by a wash-out period of 14 days. Blood samples were collected over 72 h and plasma levels of SAQ were determined by a validated HPLC/UV assay. The 90% confidence interval (CI) of the ratio of the geometric means for log-transformed C(max), AUC(last) and AUC(inf) values were used to assess bioequivalence using the equivalence interval of 80-125%. Point estimate and 90% CI of the ratios of C(max), AUC(last) and AUC(inf) values were 94.9 (80.9-111.3), 97.4 (82.4-115.4) and 97.4 (82.5-115.0), respectively. Both treatments exhibited similar tolerability and safety. It was concluded that the new pharmaceutical product was bioequivalent to the innovator.

Bioequivalence study of two oral tablet formulations containing tenofovir disoproxil fumarate in healthy volunteers.

Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF, CAS 147127-20-6) is a nucleotide reverse transcriptase inhibitor which is indicated in combination with other antiretroviral agents for the management of HIV-1 infection. The objective of this study was to compare the rate and extent of absorption and to assess the bioequivalence between a new pharmaceutical equivalent tablet formulation containing 300 mg of TDF and the innovator product. A randomized, single-center, open-label, single-dose, two-way crossover bioequivalence study in 40 healthy adult subjects was conducted. Dosing was separated by a wash-out period of 14 days. Blood samples were collected over 48 h and plasma levels of tenofovir (TFV) were determined by a validated HPLC assay. Rate and extent of absorption were similar between products. The 90% confidence interval (CI) of the ratio of the geometric means for log-transformed C(max), AUC(last) and AUC(inf) values were used to assess bioequivalence between the two formulations using the equivalence interval of 80 and 125%. In healthy subjects, the point estimate and 90% CI of the ratios of C(max), AUC(last) and AUC(inf) values were 0.99 (0.92-1.02), 0.99 (0.95-1.03) and 0.93 (0.85-1.02), respectively. Both treatments exhibited similar tolerability and safety. It was concluded that the new pharmaceutical product was bioequivalent to the innovator.