Ethnic differences in the effects of apolipoprotein E ɛ4 and vascular risk factors on accelerated brain aging.

The frequency of the apolipoprotein E ɛ4 allele and vascular risk factors differs among ethnic groups. We aimed to assess the combined effects of apolipoprotein E ɛ4 and vascular risk factors on brain age in Korean and UK cognitively unimpaired populations. We also aimed to determine the differences in the combined effects between the two populations. We enrolled 2314 cognitively unimpaired individuals aged ≥45 years from Korea and 6942 cognitively unimpaired individuals from the UK, who were matched using propensity scores. Brain age was defined using the brain age index. The apolipoprotein E genotype (ɛ4 carriers, ɛ2 carriers and ɛ3/ɛ3 homozygotes) and vascular risk factors (age, hypertension and diabetes) were considered predictors. Apolipoprotein E ɛ4 carriers in the Korean (ß = 0.511, P = 0.012) and UK (ß = 0.302, P = 0.006) groups had higher brain age index values. The adverse effects of the apolipoprotein E genotype on brain age index values increased with age in the Korean group alone (ɛ2 carriers × age, ß = 0.085, P = 0.009; ɛ4 carriers × age, ß = 0.100, P < 0.001). The apolipoprotein E genotype, age and ethnicity showed a three-way interaction with the brain age index (ɛ2 carriers × age × ethnicity, ß = 0.091, P = 0.022; ɛ4 carriers × age × ethnicity, ß = 0.093, P = 0.003). The effects of apolipoprotein E on the brain age index values were more pronounced in individuals with hypertension in the Korean group alone (ɛ4 carriers × hypertension, ß = 0.777, P = 0.038). The apolipoprotein E genotype, age and ethnicity showed a three-way interaction with the brain age index (ɛ4 carriers × hypertension × ethnicity, ß=1.091, P = 0.014). We highlight the ethnic differences in the combined effects of the apolipoprotein E ɛ4 genotype and vascular risk factors on accelerated brain age. These findings emphasize the need for ethnicity-specific strategies to mitigate apolipoprotein E ɛ4-related brain aging in cognitively unimpaired individuals.

Distinct spatiotemporal patterns of cortical thinning in Alzheimer's disease-type cognitive impairment and subcortical vascular cognitive impairment.

Previous studies on Alzheimer's disease-type cognitive impairment (ADCI) and subcortical vascular cognitive impairment (SVCI) has rarely explored spatiotemporal heterogeneity. This study aims to identify distinct spatiotemporal cortical atrophy patterns in ADCI and SVCI. 1,338 participants (713 ADCI, 208 SVCI, and 417 cognitively unimpaired elders) underwent brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), amyloid positron emission tomography, and neuropsychological tests. Using MRI, this study measures cortical thickness in five brain regions (medial temporal, inferior temporal, posterior medial parietal, lateral parietal, and frontal areas) and utilizes the Subtype and Stage Inference (SuStaIn) model to predict the most probable subtype and stage for each participant. SuStaIn identifies two distinct cortical thinning patterns in ADCI (medial temporal: 65.8%, diffuse: 34.2%) and SVCI (frontotemporal: 47.1%, parietal: 52.9%) patients. The medial temporal subtype of ADCI shows a faster decline in attention, visuospatial, visual memory, and frontal/executive domains than the diffuse subtype (p-value < 0.01). However, there are no significant differences in longitudinal cognitive outcomes between the two subtypes of SVCI. Our study provides valuable insights into the distinct spatiotemporal patterns of cortical thinning in patients with ADCI and SVCI, suggesting the potential for individualized therapeutic and preventive strategies to improve clinical outcomes.

Clinical and Pathological Validation of CT-Based Regional Harmonization Methods of Amyloid PET.

PURPOSE: The CT-based regional direct comparison Centiloid (dcCL) method was developed to harmonize and quantify regional ß-amyloid (Aß) burden. In the present study, we aimed to investigate correlations between the CT-based regional dcCL scales and Aß pathological burdens and to validate the clinical utility using thresholds derived from pathological assessment. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We included a pathological cohort of 63 cases and a clinical cohort of 4062 participants, and obtained modified Consortium to Establish a Registry for Alzheimer's Disease criteria (mCERAD) scores by assessment of neuritic plaque burdens in multiple areas of each cortical region. PET and CT images were processed using the CT-based regional dcCL method to calculate scales in 6 distinct regions. RESULTS: The CT-based regional dcCL scales were correlated with neuritic plaque burdens represented by mCERAD scores, globally and regionally ( r = 0.56~0.76). In addition, striatum dcCL scales reflected Aß involvement in the striatum ( P < 0.001). The regional dcCL scales could predict significant Aß deposition in specific brain regions with high accuracy: area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.81-0.97 with an mCERAD cutoff of 1.5 and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.88-0.93 with an mCERAD cutoff of 0.5. When applying the dcCL thresholds of 1.5 mCERAD scores, the G(-)R(+) group showed lower performances in memory and global cognitive functions and had less hippocampal volume compared with the G(-)R(-) group ( P < 0.001). However, when applying the dcCL thresholds of 0.5 mCERAD scores, there were no differences in the global cognitive functions between the 2 groups. CONCLUSIONS: The thresholds of regional dcCL scales derived from pathological assessments might provide clinicians with a better understanding of biomarker-guided diagnosis and distinguishable clinical phenotypes, which are particularly useful when harmonizing different PET ligands with only PET/CT.