Association of Chemotherapy Response Score with Multidrug Resistance 1 and CA125 ELIMination Rate Constant K in Patients with Advanced Ovarian Cancer Treated with Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy.

AIM: The relationship between chemotherapy response score (CRS), a widely used response predictor of neoadjuvant chemotherapy-interval debulking surgery (NAC-IDS), and multidrug resistance 1 (MDR1) and CA125 ELIMination rate constant K (KELIM), is undetermined. We evaluated CRS in advanced ovarian cancer patients undergoing NAC and looked for associations between CRS and MDR1 and CA125 KELIM. Our aim was to predict the therapeutic effect of NAC before interval debulking surgery (IDS) by examining its association with CRS. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included patients who underwent NAC-IDS (first-line treatment) at Kurume University Hospital, Japan, between 2004 and 2017. CRS association with MDR1 and CA125 KELIM was examined using Cox proportional hazard regression analyses. Survival curves used Kaplan-Meier method, and survival differences between groups used log-rank test. RESULTS: Overall, 55 patients were classified into CRS1 (n=22), CRS2 (n=19), and CRS3 (n=14). The CRS3 group had a significantly better prognosis than the CRS1 or CRS2 group. CRS, age, and IDS status were clinical prognostic factors for ovarian cancer. MDR1 positivity for excision repair cross-complementing group 1, ß-tubulin, and Y-box binding protein-1 occurred in 15, 17, and 11 patients, respectively, but these were not associated with CRS. CA125 KELIM was <0.5 (n=8), 0.5-1.0 (n=30), and ≥ 1.0 (n=17) but not associated with CRS. CONCLUSION: CRS is reconfirmed as a treatment response predictor for NAC-IDS, but its association with drug resistance factors remains unconfirmed.

Impact of the coverage of risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy by the national insurance system for women with BRCA pathogenic variants in Japan.

To determine the impact of the coverage of risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy (RRSO) and mastectomy (RRM) as well as genetic testing for BRCA pathogenic variants by the national insurance system in Japan. We compared the clinical background of women who underwent RRSO at our institution before and after its coverage by the national insurance system. Those who underwent RRSO between January 2017 and December 2019 and between April 2020 and March 2022 were classified as Period. A and B, respectively. Overall, 134 women underwent RRSO during the study period. In Period A and B, 45 and 89 women underwent RRSO for the study period was 36 and 24 months, respectively. Compared with Period A, the number of women who underwent RRSO per month increased by threefold in Period B (p < 0.01). In addition, the number of women who underwent surgery for breast cancer along with RRSO increased in Period B (p < 0.01). Although the number of women who underwent concurrent RRM with RRSO in Period B increased, the difference was not statistically significant. Compared with Period A, the number of women diagnosed with BRCA pathogenic variant increased by 3.9-fold, and the proportion of women who underwent concurrent hysterectomy at the time of RRSO decreased from 66 to 7.9% in Period B (p < 0.01). Owing to the introduction of the national insurance system, the number of women who underwent RRSO and concurrent surgery for breast cancer at the time of RRSO increased in Japan.

Platinum rechallenge treatment using gemcitabine plus carboplatin with or without bevacizumab for platinum-resistant ovarian cancer.

PURPOSE: Platinum-resistant ovarian cancer (PROC) is usually treated with single-agent chemotherapy. A synergistic effect of gemcitabine and platinum has been reported in PROC. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of gemcitabine and carboplatin with or without bevacizumab (GC ± B) in patients with PROC. METHODS: From April 2014 to April 2018, patients with PROC received gemcitabine on days 1 and 8, and carboplatin on day 1, with or without bevacizumab (Bev) on day 1 every 3 weeks. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR). The secondary endpoints were disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and rate of adverse events. RESULTS: In total, 215 cycles were administered to 31 patients, of whom 21 received Bev and the median number of cycle for each patient was 6 (range, 2-19). The median platinum-free interval (PFI) was 4 months. The ORR and DCR were 51.9% and 92.6%, respectively. Median PFS and OS were 7.9 months and 16.1 months, respectively. PFS and OS of patients with 3-6 months PFI were significantly longer than those with PFI < 3 months (median PFS, 9.7 vs. 5.8 months; p < 0.01; median OS, 20.0 vs. 12.1 months; p = 0.03). Grade 3 or 4 hematological toxicities observed included neutropenia (71.0%), leukopenia (54.8%), anemia (51.6%), and thrombocytopenia (25.8%). No other grade 2-4 nonhematological toxicity was observed except for hypertension in one and CBDCA hypersensitivity reaction in two. CONCLUSION: GC ± B may be effective and safe treatment alternative for PROC, especially with PFI of 3-6 months, despite hematological toxicity.

A phase II trial of irinotecan in patients with advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer and correlation with biomarker analysis.

OBJECTIVE: Chemotherapy for advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer requires further development. Irinotecan hydrochloride (CPT-11) suppresses tumor growth in several endometrial cancer strains. The present study evaluated the anti-tumor activity and toxicity of CPT-11 in patients with advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer. METHODS: Enrolled patients had advanced endometrial cancer with measurable lesions and received 2 pretreatment regimens. A 90-minute intravenous infusion of CPT-11 (100 mg/m2) was given on days 1, 8, and 15 of a 4-week cycle, aiming for an effect with ≤2 cycles. Treatment was continued until the primary disease worsened or severe toxicity occurred. The primary endpoint was response rate, and the secondary endpoints were progression-free survival, overall survival, and adverse events. Antitumor effect and adverse events were evaluated according to RECIST version 1.1 and NCI-CTC AE version 3.0, respectively. RESULTS: Twenty-two patients were registered (11 endometrioid carcinomas and 11 serous carcinomas). The median duration of the treatment-free interval (TFI) was 7.5 months, and the median number of administered cycles per patient was 4. Response rate was 36.4% (complete response: 1 patient, partial response: 7 patients). Clinical benefit rate, including stable disease, was 77.3%. Median progression-free and overall survival was 4.4 and 18.4 months, respectively. Observed adverse events included grade 4 hematotoxicity (neutropenia and thrombocytopenia), and grade 2 or 3 non-hematotoxicity (diarrhea). All adverse events were manageable. Biomarker predictors of therapeutic effectiveness were not observed. CONCLUSION: As a single agent, CPT-11 has anti-tumor activity for advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer and has manageable adverse events.