Treatment outcomes of integrase inhibitors, boosted protease inhibitors and nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors in antiretroviral-naïve persons starting treatment.

OBJECTIVES: Although outcomes of antiretroviral therapy (ART) have been evaluated in randomized controlled trials, experiences from subpopulations defined by age, CD4 count or viral load (VL) in heterogeneous real-world settings are limited. METHODS: The study design was an international multicohort collaboration. Logistic regression was used to compare virological and immunological outcomes at 12 ± 3 months after starting ART with an integrase strand transfer inhibitor (INSTI), contemporary nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI) or boosted protease inhibitor (PI/b) with two nucleos(t)ides after 1 January 2012. The composite treatment outcome (cTO) defined success as VL < 200 HIV-1 RNA copies/mL with no regimen change and no AIDS/death events. Immunological success was defined as a CD4 count > 750 cells/µL or a 33% increase where the baseline CD4 count was ≥ 500 cells/µL. Poisson regression compared clinical failures (AIDS/death ≥ 14 days after starting ART). Interactions between ART class and age, CD4 count, and VL were determined for each endpoint. RESULTS: Of 5198 ART-naïve persons in the International Cohort Consortium of Infectious Diseases (RESPOND), 45.4% started INSTIs, 26.0% PI/b and 28.7% NNRTIs; 880 (17.4%) were aged > 50 years, 2539 (49.4%) had CD4 counts < 350 cells/µL and 1891 (36.8%) had VL > 100 000 copies/mL. Differences in virological and immunological success and clinical failure among ART classes were similar across age groups (≤ 40, 40-50 and > 50 years), CD4 count categories (≤ 350 vs. > 350 cells/µL) and VL categories at ART initiation (≤ 100 000 vs. > 100 000 copies/mL), with all investigated interactions being nonsignificant (P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Differences among ART classes in virological, immunological and clinical outcomes in ART-naïve participants were consistent irrespective of age, immune suppression or VL at ART initiation. While confounding by indication cannot be excluded, this provides reassuring evidence that such subpopulations will equally benefit from contemporary ART.

Euroguidelines in Central and Eastern Europe (ECEE) conference and the Warsaw Declaration - a comprehensive meeting report.

OBJECTIVES: The objective of this paper is to summarize the outcomes of the Euroguidelines in Central and Eastern Europe (ECEE) conference held in Warsaw in February 2016. The main aim of this conference was to facilitate a discussion on European AIDS Clinical Society (EACS) guidelines implementation across the region and neighbouring countries and to present the current obstacles in benchmarking HIV care in Europe. METHODS: During a 2-day meeting, there were country-based presentations using a predefined template so as to make the data comparable and focus the discussion. Areas covered were country epidemiology, surveillance, national strategy for treatment and prevention, standards of care, access to care and treatment availability. Each participant filled in a questionnaire investigating HIV guidelines usage per country. RESULTS: In total, 16 Central and Eastern Europe (CEE) and neighbouring countries were represented at the conference: Albania, Armenia, Belarus, Croatia, Czech Republic, Estonia, Georgia, Hungary, Lithuania, Moldova, Poland, Romania, Russia, Serbia, Slovakia and Turkey. EACS guidelines version 7.1 were used in 14 (87%) countries. In 11 (69%) countries, national guidelines were available, of which eight had been recently updated. Half of the countries declared that they use World Health Organization (WHO) and Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) guidelines, over one-third the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC) HIV testing guidelines and one in five the International Antiviral Society-USA (IAS-USA) Panel guidelines from 2012. CONCLUSIONS: Participants declared their will to promote the widespread use of EACS guidelines for HIV infection in the CEE region and neighbouring countries by signing the Warsaw Declaration. They also emphasized the need to increase publishing of data from national cohorts in that region.

Lytic to temperate switching of viral communities.

Microbial viruses can control host abundances via density-dependent lytic predator-prey dynamics. Less clear is how temperate viruses, which coexist and replicate with their host, influence microbial communities. Here we show that virus-like particles are relatively less abundant at high host densities. This suggests suppressed lysis where established models predict lytic dynamics are favoured. Meta-analysis of published viral and microbial densities showed that this trend was widespread in diverse ecosystems ranging from soil to freshwater to human lungs. Experimental manipulations showed viral densities more consistent with temperate than lytic life cycles at increasing microbial abundance. An analysis of 24 coral reef viromes showed a relative increase in the abundance of hallmark genes encoded by temperate viruses with increased microbial abundance. Based on these four lines of evidence, we propose the Piggyback-the-Winner model wherein temperate dynamics become increasingly important in ecosystems with high microbial densities; thus 'more microbes, fewer viruses'.

Comparison of nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor use as part of first-line therapy in a Serbian and a UK HIV clinic.

BACKGROUND: Use of dideoxynucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (dNRTIs) may lead to increased mitochondrial toxicity. We compared nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NRTI) use as part of antiretroviral therapy (ART) in two HIV clinics: one in a low-middle income (HIV Centre Belgrade [HCB], Serbia) and one a high income (ICDC, Royal Free Hospital, London, UK) country. METHODS: Antiretroviral naïve patients starting ART from 2003 to 2005 were included. Specific NRTIs were compared between centers, focusing on dNRTI use. Kaplan-Meier estimates of the percentage of patients making changes to their NRTI backbone (a) for any reason or (b) for mitochondrial toxicity (peripheral neuropathy, pancreatitis, lactic acidosis) were calculated. RESULTS: Of 287 HCB patients, 89 (31.0%) received didanosine (ddI)-containing, 39 (13.6%) stavudine (d4T)-containing, and 39 (13.6%) ddI+d4T-containing regimens; for 539 ICDC patients, these were 18 (3.3%), 66 (12.2%), and 0 (0.0%), respectively (p < .0001). After 12 months, 57.5% and 52.6% at HCB and ICDC had switched their NRTI backbone. This was reduced to 34.5% at HCB after excluding changes due to drug supply interruption and to 11.2% and 1.3% at HCB and ICDC after changes were made for mitochondrial-related reasons. At 6 months, 73/80 (91.3%) and 385/488 (78.9%) had viral load below 50 copies/mL at HCB and ICDC, respectively. CONCLUSION: Patients treated at HCB faced higher levels of mitochondrial-related toxicity, likely due to greater dNRTI use.

The relationships of ABCB1 3435C>T and CYP2B6 516G>T with high-density lipoprotein cholesterol in HIV-infected patients receiving Efavirenz.

Non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTIs) are associated with a favorable increase in high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-c) level. Isolated studies have found a direct correlation between efavirenz (EFV) exposure and HDL-c level changes. Here we explore the impact that drug disposition variants associated with EFV exposure have on changes in HDL-c level. Seventy-six patients on first-line EFV-based regimens were genotyped for CYP2B6 516G>T and ABCB1 3435C>T. There was a 37% increase (+0.32 mmol/l, P < 0.001) in mean HDL-c level over 48 weeks, and this was univariately associated with gender (male +0.26 mmol/l, female +0.55 mmol/l; P = 0.03), ABCB1 3435C>T (CC +0.26 mmol/l, CT +0.16 mmol/l, TT +0.54 mmol/l; P(ANOVA) = 0.003) and CYP2B6 516 G>T (GG +0.27 mmol/l, GT +0.29 mmol/l, TT +0.72 mmol/l; P(ANOVA) = 0.08). There was a significant association between the cumulative number of predictive genotypes (CYP2B6 516TT or ABCB1 3435TT) and mean HDL-c level change: (group 0 +0.20 mmol/l, group 1 +0.47 mmol/l, group 2 +1.00 mmol/l; P(ANOVA) < 0.0001). These findings need to be validated in independent cohorts.

Cytochrome P450 2B6 516G-->T is associated with plasma concentrations of nevirapine at both 200 mg twice daily and 400 mg once daily in an ethnically diverse population.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of the study was to characterize the impact of the cytochrome P450 2B6 (CYP2B6), CYP3A4, CYP3A5 and ATP-binding cassette sub-family B member 1 (ABCB1) polymorphisms on nevirapine plasma concentrations. METHODS: A total of 104 patients (82% male; 26% non-Caucasian) were genotyped for eight single nucleotide polymorphisms at four loci (CYP2B6, CYP3A4, CYP3A5 and MDR1). Nevirapine plasma concentrations were determined using high-performance liquid chromatography. RESULTS: Non-Caucasian ethnicity [5609 ng/mL (n=27) for non-Caucasians vs. 3771 ng/mL (n=77) for Caucasians; P<0.0001] and CYP2B6 516G-->T [GG, 3574 ng/mL (n=50); GT, 4634 ng/mL (n=50); TT, 8170 ng/mL (n=4); P(analysis of variance (anova))=0.001] were significantly associated with a higher nevirapine trough concentration (C(trough)). The latter association was maintained with both 200 mg twice daily (bid) and 400 mg once daily (qd) dosing [GG, 3527 ng/mL (n=30); GT, 4525 ng/mL (n=32); TT, 7020 ng/mL (n=2); P(anova)=0.05 and GG, 3645 ng/mL (n=20); GT, 4861 ng/mL (n=17); TT, 9508 ng/mL (n=2); P(anova)=0.01, respectively]. In a multivariable analysis, CYP2B6 516G-->T and non-Caucasian ethnicity remained significant predictors of nevirapine C(trough) but CYP2B6 516G-->T homozygosity had the greatest effect (108% higher, 46% higher). No associations were found between nevirapine C(trough) and the remaining polymorphisms. CONCLUSION: In this population, both non-Caucasian ethnicity and carriage of the variant allele of CYP2B6 516G-->T were significant predictors of nevirapine C(trough). The association between CYP2B6 516G-->T and higher plasma nevirapine exposure was maintained at both bid and qd dosing.

Factors associated with viral rebound among highly treatment-experienced HIV-positive patients who have achieved viral suppression.

OBJECTIVE: More and more highly treatment-experienced patients are achieving viral suppression. However, the durability of suppression remains unclear. METHODS: Patients from Royal Free Hospital (London, UK) and JW Goethe University Hospital (Frankfurt, Germany) who had failed > or = 1 antiretroviral (ARV) regimen in all three main drug classes and > or = 3 previous ARV regimens and subsequently achieved viral load < 50 HIV-1 RNA copies/mL were included. They were followed until stopping pre-combination antiretroviral therapy, end of follow-up or viral rebound (two viral loads >400 copies/mL). RESULTS: Two hundred and forty-seven patients contributed 723 person-years and 114 viral rebounds [rate=15.8 per 100 person-years; 95% confidence interval (CI) 12.9-18.7]. More recent calendar years of viral suppression [relative risk (RR)=0.90 per year later; 95% CI 0.81-1.00; P=0.05] and greater number of ARVs in the regimen not previously failed (RR=0.78 per 1 ARV more; 95% CI 0.65-0.95; P=0.01) were associated with lower viral rebound rates. At 0-1, 1-2, 2-3 and > 3 years after achieving suppression, the rebound rates were 30.9, 9.2, 4.3 and 3.5 per 100 person-years, respectively. Compared to 0-1 years, the adjusted RRs (95% CIs) after 1-2, 2-3 and > 3 years were 0.33 (0.18-0.58), 0.21 (0.09-0.48) and 0.14 (0.06-0.33), respectively (P<0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Although rebound rates are high, especially in the first year after viral suppression, this risk reduces substantially if highly treatment-experienced patients can maintain viral suppression.

Pharmacokinetics of acetyl-L-carnitine given in single or multiple doses to HIV-1 Infected patients with toxic peripheral polyneuropathy.

The use of nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors in the treatment of HIV infection is associated with antiretroviral toxic polyneuropathy (ATN). Previous studies suggest that long term treatment with Acetyl-L-carnitine (ALCAR) 1.5 gram twice daily improves symptoms and promotes nerve regeneration. It is unknown whether the drug's pharmacokinetic profile would allow for a once daily administration. Twenty three HIV-1 infected subjects taking ALCAR for ATN were enrolled in a cross over trial and switched from twice to once daily dosing. Their regimen was changed from 1.5 g twice daily to 1g (4 patients), 2g (7), and 3g (12) once daily, respectively. Twelve healthy volunteers served as control. Plasma levels of ALCAR and its metabolite L-carnitine were measured. Patients receiving ALCAR had higher pre-dose levels than control subjects. Post dose levels were not significantly higher than pre dose levels in any treatment group. The pre / post dose ALCAR concentrations were 7.6 / 7.7, 7.1 / 6.8, 7.7 / 6.8, and 7.1 / 7.5 micromol/l for 1.5 g twice daily, 1g once daily, 2g once daily, and 3g once daily, respectively. All values were significantly higher than the mean concentration in the control group (4.3 micromol/l). For ALCAR and L-carnitine, measurements for once daily regimens did not differ from the twice daily regimen. Once daily dosing of ALCAR can achieve similar plasma levels as twice daily dosing but intra-mitochondrial levels remain unknown. The pharmacokinetic profile of orally administered ALCAR is complex and likely to be highly affected by endogenous concentrations.

Long-term clinical and surrogate marker effects of subcutaneous intermittent interleukin-2 without antiretroviral therapy in HIV-infected patients.

OBJECTIVES: Subcutaneous administration of interleukin-2 (IL-2) has been shown to increase CD4 counts in HIV-infected patients. It remains unclear whether this effect is associated with a clinical benefit. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We conducted a long-term follow-up in the cohort of the UK-Vanguard study in which three groups of 12 antiretroviral-naive subjects with CD4 cell counts >350 cells/mm(3) received no treatment or IL-2 at either 4.5 or 7.5 MIU twice daily in 5 day cycles, respectively. RESULTS: Mean follow-up was 376 weeks. IL-2 therapy was associated with a higher area under the curve of CD4 cell count change from baseline at week 48 but not thereafter. HIV-RNA levels were unaffected. Highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) was initiated after a mean of 172, 175 and 152 weeks in the control group, low-dose and high-dose IL-2 treatment group, respectively, a statistically non-significant difference. There was a tendency to start HAART soon after discontinuation of IL-2 therapy which may have been triggered by the steep decay of CD4 counts. There were two serious adverse events in the control group, seven in the low-dose IL-2 group and eight in the high-dose IL-2 group. No pattern of disease was detected, making an association with IL-2 therapy unlikely. CONCLUSIONS: We could detect neither a benefit of IL-2 therapy after week 48 nor delayed initiation of HAART. This is currently the longest follow-up data comparing IL-2 therapy with no therapy in antiretroviral-naive HIV-infected patients and does not show a persistent benefit of the intervention.

Treatment outcome and cost-effectiveness of different highly active antiretroviral therapy regimens in the UK (1996-2002).

The aim of this study was to estimate the outcome and cost-effectiveness per life-year-gained (LYG) of first-, second- and third-line non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTI) versus protease inhibitor (PI) containing highly active antiretroviral therapy regimens. Hospital care costs (2002 US dollars discounted 3.5% per annum) were linked to treatment failure times. Results show that the median time-to-treatment failure for first-line (nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors) 2NRTIs + NNRTI was substantially longer than that for 2NRTIs + PI(boosted), 2NRTIs + PI and 2NRTIs + 2PIs, whereas for second- and third-line they were similar. Comparing first-line 2NRTIs + NNRTI with 2NRTIs + PI(boosted) cost per LYG was US$ 12,375; US$ 12,139 per LYG when compared with 2NRTIs + PI and US$ 2948 per LYG when compared with 2NRTIs + 2PIs. For second-line cost per LYG comparing 2NRTIs + NNRTI with 2NRTIs + PI(boosted) was US$ 19,501; US$ 18,364 per LYG when compared with 2NRTIs + PI and cost-saving when compared with 2NRTIs + 2PIs. For third-line cost per LYG comparing 2NRTIs + NNRTI with 2NRTIs + PI(boosted) was US$ 2708; US$ 11,559 per LYG when compared with 2NRTIs + PI and cost-saving when compared with 2NRTIs + 2PIs. In conclusion, first-line 2NRTIs + NNRTI was cost-effective or cost-saving when compared with PI-containing regimens for all lines of therapy. Such information is required by clinicians and managers of HIV services to make appropriate treatment decisions based on clinical and financial grounds, and given the increasing number of people living with HIV, such information will become more important over time.

An audit of viral load in one clinical population to describe features of viraemic patients on antiretroviral therapy.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the prevalence of an undetectable viral load (VL) (<50 HIV-1 RNA copies/mL) in a clinical population and to identify those viraemic and at risk of failing antiretroviral therapy (ART). METHODS: An audit of a complete clinical population on 1 January 2005 via a clinical database and clinical note review. RESULTS: On 1 January 2005, 1910 patients were under care; 1229/1332 (92%) of those exposed to ART for >16 weeks had a VL of <50 copies/mL. We examined 49/56 case notes of viraemic patients to identify explanations for viraemia. Common reasons included previous initial mono- or dual therapy, adherence problems, more advanced HIV disease, concomitant medications, physical and mental health issues and being less well linked into the service. A review of these patients' current status on 1 April 2007 showed that six of the 49 had since died. However, of those still alive, 20 (47%) had a VL <500 copies/mL. CONCLUSIONS: The proportion of patients on ART with detectable viraemia is low in current clinical practice. New drugs may help those who are failing because of resistance. However, there is a small minority of patients who, for various reasons, appear unable to maintain sufficient adherence to ART.

A double-blind, parallel-group, placebo-controlled, multicentre study of acetyl L-carnitine in the symptomatic treatment of antiretroviral toxic neuropathy in patients with HIV-1 infection.

BACKGROUND: Nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) disrupt neuronal mitochondrial DNA synthesis, resulting in antiretroviral toxic neuropathy (ATN). Acetyl-L-carnitine (ALCAR) enhances neurotrophic support of sensory neurones, potentially providing symptom relief and nerve regeneration. OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to assess the safety and efficacy compared to placebo of intramuscular ALCAR in HIV-positive patients with symptomatic distal symmetrical polyneuropathy. METHODS: Ninety patients were enrolled and randomized to receive ALCAR [500 mg twice a day (bid); n=43] or placebo (n=47) intramuscularly twice daily for 14 days followed by 42 days of oral ALCAR 1000 mg bid. Assessment of pain was obtained using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), Total Symptom Score (TSS), Clinical Global Impression of Change, McGill Pain Questionnaire (MPQ), and the need for rescue analgesics. RESULTS: There was no statistically significant difference in changes in VAS over 14 days between groups for the intent-to-treat (ITT) population, but for the efficacy-evaluable (EE) population ALCAR treatment produced a significantly greater reduction in pain compared with placebo (P=0.022). The proportion of patients with an improvement in TSS over 14 days was greater in the ALCAR group compared with the placebo group, but the differences were not statistically significant. During the open-label phase, patients experienced an improvement in pain, as measured by the VAS, TSS and McGill Pain Questionnaire. CONCLUSION: ALCAR, administered twice a day intramuscularly to HIV-1-infected patients with symptomatic ATN, significantly reduced weekly mean pain ratings on the VAS compared with placebo. Treatment with oral ALCAR improved symptoms for the patient group as a whole. Intramuscular and oral ALCAR was generally safe and well tolerated.

No association between HIV disease and its treatment and thyroid function.

OBJECTIVES: The aims of the study were (i) to investigate the prevalence of overt and subclinical thyroid disease in HIV-positive patients in a London teaching hospital; (ii) to determine risk factors associated with the development of thyroid dysfunction, including highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) and individual antivirals, and (iii) to determine the occurrence of thyroid dysfunction longitudinally over 3 years. METHODS: The study consisted of retrospective analyses of thyroid function tests (TFT) in HIV-positive patients. The period prevalence of and factors associated with clinical and subclinical thyroid dysfunction were investigated. Patients with normal TFT but previous thyroid disease were identified from pharmacy records and included in the overt category. RESULTS: A total of 1565 patients (73% of the clinic population) had at least one TFT taken since 2001. Overall, 3584 samples were analysed. Of the patients included in the study, 1233 (79%) were male, 1043 (66%) were white and 365 (23%) were black African, and in 969 (62%) the main risk for HIV was homosexual sex. Median age at baseline was 37 years. Nine hundred patients (58%) were on HAART at the start of the study. Thirty-nine (2.5%) were found to have overt hypothyroidism, and eight (<1%) had overt hyperthyroidism. Sixty-one (4%) had subclinical hypothyroidism, five (<1%) had subclinical hyperthyroidism and 263 (17%) had a nonthyroidal illness. A normal TFT was obtained for 1118 patients (75.5%). Multivariate analysis suggested that no independent variables were significantly associated with overt hypothyroidism, including HAART and stavudine use specifically. Repeated measurements over 3 years were available for 825 patients and only eight new cases (1%) of overt thyroid disease occurred. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of overt thyroid disease was low in this cohort, suggesting that screening is not warranted.

Haemoglobin and albumin as markers of HIV disease progression in the highly active antiretroviral therapy era: relationships with gender.

OBJECTIVES: The aims of the study were to describe gender differences in haemoglobin and albumin and to investigate the prognostic value of these measurements in relation to highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART). METHODS: Anaemia was defined as haemoglobin <13.5 g/dL for men and <11.5 g/dL for women. Albumin <35 g/L was defined as hypoalbuminaemia. Proportional hazards models were used to describe relationships between these markers and HIV progression and death. RESULTS: A total of 291 patients had pre-HAART and 1-year measurements. Mean haemoglobin and albumin levels pre-HAART were lower in women than in men (haemoglobin: 11.2 vs 13.2 g/dL, respectively, P<0.0001; albumin: 37.4 vs 40.2 g/L, respectively, P<0.0001), and a higher proportion of women were anaemic and hypoalbuminaemic compared with men. Despite a rise in both markers in the first year on HAART, mean haemoglobin levels remained lower by 2.08 g/dL (P<0.0001) and albumin by 2.88 g/L (P<0.0001) in women. In the 495 patients included in this analysis, haemoglobin and albumin levels were both significantly related to short-term risk of AIDS and death independently of CD4 count [hazards ratio (HR)=0.73/g/dL higher haemoglobin, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.55-0.82, P<0.0001 and HR=0.87/g/L higher albumin, 95% CI 0.83-0.91, P<0.0001]. The prognostic value did not differ by gender. CONCLUSIONS: Women were more likely to be anaemic and/or hypoalbuminaemic pre-HAART, but post-HAART increases were similar to those in men. Both haemoglobin and albumin were strong independent prognostic factors for risk of AIDS and death, regardless of gender.

Treatment outcomes amongst previously antiretroviral-naïve HIV-infected patients starting lopinavir/ritonavir-containing antiretroviral regimens at the Royal Free Hospital.

OBJECTIVE: To describe outcomes in patients starting first-line antiretroviral regimens including lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/r) in a routine clinic setting. METHODS: Previously naïve patients starting LPV/r-containing antiretroviral therapy were included in the study. Virological failure was defined as the first of two viral loads >500 HIV-1 RNA copies/mL more than 6 months after starting LPV/r. Cumulative percentages experiencing virological failure were calculated using Kaplan-Meier methods. RESULTS: A total of 195 individuals had a median follow-up time of 1.7 years. At 48 weeks, 87.9, 77.4 and 71.6% of patients with pretreatment CD4 counts of <50, 50-200 and >200 cells/microL, respectively, remained on LPV/r. By 48, 72 and 96 weeks, 2.2, 3.0 and 5.0% of patients, respectively, had experienced virological failure, ignoring treatment changes but censoring follow-up at discontinuation of all antiretrovirals; these percentages became 24.0, 33.7 and 42.3% when LPV/r discontinuation was considered as virological failure. Censoring those who stopped LPV/r with a viral load <50 copies/mL and considering as virological failures those who stopped LPV/r with a viral load >50 copies/mL gave 12.1, 14.6 and 17.0% virological failure at 48, 72 and 96 weeks, respectively. Median CD4 count increases at 24, 48 and 72 weeks were 167, 230 and 253 cells/microL, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Few patients experienced virological failure whilst on a LPV/r-based regimen, although it was not uncommon for patients in our clinic with higher baseline CD4 counts to discontinue LPV/r.

Updated European recommendations for the clinical use of HIV drug resistance testing.

In most European countries, HIV drug resistance testing has become a routine clinical tool. However, its practical implementation in a clinical context is demanding. The European HIV Drug Resistance Panel was established to make recommendations to clinicians and virologists on this topic and to propose quality control measures. The panel recommends resistance testing for the following indications: i) drug-naive patients with acute or recent infection; ii) therapy failure, including suboptimal treatment response, when treatment change is considered; iii) pregnant HIV-1-infected women and paediatric patients with detectable viral load when treatment initiation or change is considered; and iv) genotype source patient when post-exposure prophylaxis is considered. In addition, for drug-naive patients with chronic infection in whom treatment is to be started, the panel suggests that resistance testing should be strongly considered and recommends testing the earliest sample for drug resistance if suspicion of resistance is high or prevalence of resistance in this population exceeds 10%. The panel does not favour genotyping over phenotype, however it is anticipated that genotyping will be used more often because of its greater accessibility, lower cost and faster turnaround time. For the interpretation of resistance data, clinically validated systems should be used to the greatest extent possible. It is mandatory that laboratories performing HIV resistance tests take regular part in quality assurance programs. Similarly, it is necessary that HIV clinicians and virologists take part in continuous education and meet regularly to discuss problematic clinical cases. Indeed, resistance test results should be used in the context of all other clinically relevant information for predicting therapy response. The panel also encourages the timely collection of epidemiological information to estimate the impact of transmission of resistant HIV and the prevalence of HIV-1 non-B subtypes in the different European countries.

An audit of antiretroviral treatment use in HIV-infected patients in a London clinic: the limitations of observational databases when auditing antiretroviral treatment use.

OBJECTIVE: To audit the use of antiretroviral (ARV) treatment in a large treatment clinic in the UK against the British HIV Association (BHIVA) ARV treatment guidelines. METHODS: All patients under follow-up between 1st January 2000 and 1st January 2001 were included. The most recent CD4 count and HIV RNA level prior to 1st January 2001, and the nadir CD4 count and peak HIV RNA level over follow-up, were used to identify which patients should be receiving HAART according to the guidelines. RESULTS: One thousand two hundred and sixty-four patients were included in the analysis (63.8% homosexual, 29.0% heterosexual risk; 72.9% white; 79.2% male). Almost half of patients had ever had a CD4 count below 200 cells/ micro L and over 80% had previously had a viral load above 4 log10 HIV-1 RNA copies/mL. Under 2000 BHIVA guidelines, treatment would be recommended in 77.4% patients. Overall, 819 patients were receiving ARV therapy. Two hundred and eighty-five patients were not receiving treatment when guidelines suggest they should (including 33 patients who were receiving regimens not recommended in the guidelines). These patients were younger, less likely to be homosexual and had higher CD4 nadirs than those who were receiving ARV treatment. Almost half of these patients had previously received ARV therapy but were not currently receiving it. CONCLUSION: Only a small proportion of patients at our centre were not receiving ARV treatment in line with national guidelines. While genuine reasons may exist for these departures from optimal care, this may simply reflect the limitations of using observational databases when auditing treatment use in a clinic setting.