Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
1.
Transplantation ; 108(3): 777-786, 2024 Mar 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37899481

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD) is the leading cause of death beyond the first year after lung transplantation. The development of donor-specific antibodies (DSA) is a recognized risk factor for CLAD. Based on experience in kidney transplantation, we hypothesized that belatacept, a selective T-cell costimulatory blocker, would reduce the incidence of DSA after lung transplantation, which may ameliorate the risk of CLAD. METHODS: We conducted a pilot randomized controlled trial (RCT) at 2 sites to assess the feasibility and inform the design of a large-scale RCT. All participants were treated with rabbit antithymocyte globulin for induction immunosuppression. Participants in the control arm were treated with tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, and prednisone, and participants in the belatacept arm were treated with tacrolimus, belatacept, and prednisone through day 89 after transplant then converted to belatacept, mycophenolate mofetil, and prednisone for the remainder of year 1. RESULTS: After randomizing 27 participants, 3 in the belatacept arm died compared with none in the control arm. As a result, we stopped enrollment and treatment with belatacept, and all participants were treated with standard-of-care immunosuppression. Overall, 6 participants in the belatacept arm died compared with none in the control arm (log rank P = 0.008). We did not observe any differences in the incidence of DSA, acute cellular rejection, antibody-mediated rejection, CLAD, or infections between the 2 groups. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that the investigational regimen used in this pilot RCT is associated with increased mortality after lung transplantation.


Asunto(s)
Trasplante de Pulmón , Tacrolimus , Humanos , Abatacept/uso terapéutico , Tacrolimus/efectos adversos , Ácido Micofenólico/uso terapéutico , Prednisona/uso terapéutico , Proyectos Piloto , Inmunosupresores/efectos adversos , Terapia de Inmunosupresión , Anticuerpos , Trasplante de Pulmón/efectos adversos , Rechazo de Injerto/prevención & control , Rechazo de Injerto/etiología , Supervivencia de Injerto
2.
Ann Thorac Surg ; 105(3): 893-900, 2018 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29394994

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Lung disease is the leading cause of morbidity and death in scleroderma patients, but scleroderma is often considered a contraindication to lung transplantation because of concerns for worse outcomes. We evaluated whether 5-year survival in scleroderma patients after lung transplantation differed from other patients with restrictive lung disease. METHODS: This was a single-center, retrospective cohort study of all patients undergoing bilateral lung transplantation for scleroderma-related pulmonary disease between January 2006 and December 2014. This cohort was compared with patients undergoing bilateral lung transplantation for nonscleroderma group D restrictive disease. Primary outcomes reported were 1-year and 5-year survival. Diagnoses were identified by United Network of Organ Sharing listing and were confirmed by clinical examination and prelisting workup. RESULTS: We compared 26 patients who underwent BLT for scleroderma and 155 patients who underwent BLT for group D restrictive disease. Overall, the nonscleroderma cohort was younger, with lower lung allocation score but no difference in functional status. Donor characteristics were not different between the cohorts. Survival at 1 year was not different (73.1% vs 80.0%, p = 0.323). Long-term survival at 5 years was also not significantly different (65.4% vs 66.5%, p = 0.608). Multivariate Cox proportional hazards analysis found no differences in survival between scleroderma and nonscleroderma group D restrictive disease (hazard ratio, 2.19; p = 0.122). CONCLUSIONS: Despite being at high risk for extrapulmonary complications, patients undergoing bilateral lung transplantation for scleroderma have similar 1-year and 5-year survival as those with restrictive lung disease. Transplantation is a reasonable treatment option for a carefully selected population of candidates.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Pulmonares/mortalidad , Enfermedades Pulmonares/cirugía , Trasplante de Pulmón , Esclerodermia Sistémica/mortalidad , Esclerodermia Sistémica/cirugía , Adulto , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Enfermedades Pulmonares/etiología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Estudios Retrospectivos , Esclerodermia Sistémica/complicaciones , Tasa de Supervivencia , Resultado del Tratamiento
3.
N Engl J Med ; 354(2): 141-50, 2006 Jan 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16407509

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Conventional regimens of immunosuppressive drugs often do not prevent chronic rejection after lung transplantation. Topical delivery of cyclosporine in addition to conventional systemic immunosuppression might help prevent acute and chronic rejection events. METHODS: We conducted a single-center, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of inhaled cyclosporine initiated within six weeks after transplantation and given in addition to systemic immunosuppression. A total of 58 patients were randomly assigned to inhale either 300 mg of aerosol cyclosporine (28 patients) or aerosol placebo (30 patients) three days a week for the first two years after transplantation. The primary end point was the rate of histologic acute rejection. RESULTS: The rates of acute rejection of grade 2 or higher were similar in the cyclosporine and placebo groups: 0.44 episode (95 percent confidence interval, 0.31 to 0.62) vs. 0.46 episode (95 percent confidence interval, 0.33 to 0.64) per patient per year, respectively (P=0.87 by Poisson regression). Survival was improved with aerosolized cyclosporine, with 3 deaths among patients receiving cyclosporine and 14 deaths among patients receiving placebo (relative risk of death, 0.20; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.06 to 0.70; P=0.01). Chronic rejection-free survival also improved with cyclosporine, as determined by spirometric analysis (10 events in the cyclosporine group and 20 events in the placebo group; relative risk of chronic rejection, 0.38; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.18 to 0.82; P=0.01) and histologic analysis (6 vs. 19 events, respectively; relative risk, 0.27; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.11 to 0.67; P=0.005). The risks of nephrotoxic effects and opportunistic infection were similar for patients in the cyclosporine group and the placebo group. CONCLUSIONS: Inhaled cyclosporine did not improve the rate of acute rejection, but it did improve survival and extend periods of chronic rejection-free survival. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00268515.).


Asunto(s)
Ciclosporina/administración & dosificación , Rechazo de Injerto/prevención & control , Inmunosupresores/administración & dosificación , Trasplante de Pulmón , Enfermedad Aguda , Administración por Inhalación , Enfermedad Crónica , Ciclosporina/efectos adversos , Ciclosporina/uso terapéutico , Método Doble Ciego , Quimioterapia Combinada , Femenino , Humanos , Inmunosupresores/efectos adversos , Inmunosupresores/uso terapéutico , Infecciones/etiología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Análisis Multivariante , Análisis de Regresión , Análisis de Supervivencia
4.
Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol ; 30(2): 139-44, 2004 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12855408

RESUMEN

We earlier showed that the ionotropic glutamate receptor agonist N-methyl D-aspartate (NMDA) induces excitotoxic pulmonary edema, and that endogenous activation of NMDA receptors (NMDAR) could mediate lung injury caused by oxidative stress. In this study, we searched for evidence of NMDAR expression in the rat lung and in the alveolar macrophage (AM) cell line NR8383, and for possible regulation of receptor expression by NMDA. The presence of mRNA for NMDAR 1 and the four known NMDAR 2 subtypes (A, B, C, and D) was examined by reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction using isoform-specific primers. NMDAR 1 was expressed in all lung regions examined (peripheral, midlung, and mainstem), as well as in trachea and the AMs. Expression of NMDAR 2A and 2B subtypes was not detected, whereas NMDAR 2C was present only in peripheral and mid-lung samples. NMDAR 2D was the dominant subtype expressed in the peripheral, gas-exchange zone of lung and in alveolar macrophages, and this expression was upregulated in lungs treated with NMDA. Western blot confirmed the presence of NMDAR 1 protein in all lung regions and in AMs. These findings provide a molecular-biological basis for the excitotoxic actions of glutamate in rat lungs and airways, and raise the question of a possible physiologic role for NMDAR in lung and airway function.


Asunto(s)
Pulmón/anatomía & histología , Pulmón/metabolismo , Receptores de N-Metil-D-Aspartato/metabolismo , Animales , Línea Celular , Macrófagos Alveolares/citología , Macrófagos Alveolares/metabolismo , Masculino , N-Metilaspartato/metabolismo , Isoformas de Proteínas/genética , Isoformas de Proteínas/metabolismo , ARN Mensajero/metabolismo , Ratas , Ratas Sprague-Dawley , Receptores de N-Metil-D-Aspartato/genética
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA