Mechanical stress impairs pheromone signaling via Pkc1-mediated regulation of the MAPK scaffold Ste5.

Cells continuously adapt cellular processes by integrating external and internal signals. In yeast, multiple stress signals regulate pheromone signaling to prevent mating under unfavorable conditions. However, the underlying crosstalk mechanisms remain poorly understood. Here, we show that mechanical stress activates Pkc1, which prevents lysis of pheromone-treated cells by inhibiting polarized growth. In vitro Pkc1 phosphorylates conserved residues within the RING-H2 domains of the scaffold proteins Far1 and Ste5, which are also phosphorylated in vivo. Interestingly, Pkc1 triggers dispersal of Ste5 from mating projections upon mechanically induced stress and during cell-cell fusion, leading to inhibition of the MAPK Fus3. Indeed, RING phosphorylation interferes with Ste5 membrane association by preventing binding to the receptor-linked Gßγ protein. Cells expressing nonphosphorylatable Ste5 undergo increased lysis upon mechanical stress and exhibit defects in cell-cell fusion during mating, which is exacerbated by simultaneous expression of nonphosphorylatable Far1. These results uncover a mechanical stress-triggered crosstalk mechanism modulating pheromone signaling, polarized growth, and cell-cell fusion during mating.

RING Dimerization Links Higher-Order Assembly of TRIM5α to Synthesis of K63-Linked Polyubiquitin.

Members of the tripartite motif (TRIM) protein family of RING E3 ubiquitin (Ub) ligases promote innate immune responses by catalyzing synthesis of polyubiquitin chains linked through lysine 63 (K63). Here, we investigate the mechanism by which the TRIM5α retroviral restriction factor activates Ubc13, the K63-linkage-specific E2. Structural, biochemical, and functional characterization of the TRIM5α:Ubc13-Ub interactions reveals that activation of the Ubc13-Ub conjugate requires dimerization of the TRIM5α RING domain. Our data explain how higher-order oligomerization of TRIM5α, which is promoted by the interaction with the retroviral capsid, enhances the E3 Ub ligase activity of TRIM5α and contributes to its antiretroviral function. This E3 mechanism, in which RING dimerization is transient and depends on the interaction of the TRIM protein with the ligand, is likely to be conserved in many members of the TRIM family and may have evolved to facilitate recognition of repetitive epitope patterns associated with infection.

Rapid structural characterization of human antibody-antigen complexes through experimentally validated computational docking.

If we understand the structural rules governing antibody (Ab)-antigen (Ag) interactions in a given virus, then we have the molecular basis to attempt to design and synthesize new epitopes to be used as vaccines or optimize the antibodies themselves for passive immunization. Comparing the binding of several different antibodies to related Ags should also further our understanding of general principles of recognition. To obtain and compare the three-dimensional structure of a large number of different complexes, however, we need a faster method than traditional experimental techniques. While biocomputational docking is fast, its results might not be accurate. Combining experimental validation with computational prediction may be a solution. As a proof of concept, here we isolated a monoclonal Ab from the blood of a human donor recovered from dengue virus infection, characterized its immunological properties, and identified its epitope on domain III of dengue virus E protein through simple and rapid NMR chemical shift mapping experiments. We then obtained the three-dimensional structure of the Ab/Ag complex by computational docking, using the NMR data to drive and validate the results. In an attempt to represent the multiple conformations available to flexible Ab loops, we docked several different starting models and present the result as an ensemble of models equally agreeing with the experimental data. The Ab was shown to bind a region accessible only in part on the viral surface, explaining why it cannot effectively neutralize the virus.