The Importance of Assessing Drug Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics in the Obese Population During Drug Development.

Obesity remains a US national health crisis and a growing concern worldwide. Concerningly, individuals who are obese are at an increased risk for comorbid diseases that include, but are not limited to, hypertension, diabetes, cardiovascular disease, and cancer. Beyond the risk for developing these conditions, obesity may also impact the pharmacological activity of the therapies being used to treat them and other disease states. The pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics (PD), safety, and efficacy of therapies, both currently marketed and under clinical development, may be directly impacted by the physiological alterations that occur secondary to the occurrence of chronic excess body weight. The increased prevalence of this disease should not be ignored. Both private and federal institutions involved in drug research and development should consider, as appropriate, a greater inclusion of individuals who are obese in clinical trials throughout the entirety of drug development, and leverage the available PK, PD, safety, and efficacy data to make more informed dosing recommendations.

JNJ-10450232 (NTM-006), A novel non-opioid with structural similarities to acetaminophen, produces relatively long-lasting analgesia after a single dose in patients undergoing 3rd molar extraction.

JNJ-10450232 (NTM-006) is a non-opioid, non-NSAID analgesic and antipyretic compound with structural similarity to acetaminophen. Preclinical models show comparable analgesia relative to acetaminophen and no evidence of hepatotoxicity associated with overdose. Moreover, it was safe and generally well tolerated in a First-in-Human Study. This single-dose, single-center, inpatient, randomized, double-blind study in moderate-to-severe acute pain following third molar extraction compared efficacy and safety of 250 mg and 1000 mg JNJ-10450232 (NTM-006), 1000 mg acetaminophen, and placebo during the 24 h following administration. While onset of action of 1000 mg JNJ-10450232 (NTM-006) was relatively slower compared with acetaminophen, its duration of action was sustained up to 24 h being superior beginning 7 h after administration. No clinically important differences among treatment groups in nature or severity of adverse events were observed and no serious adverse events were reported. Increased bilirubin, potentially due to UGT1A1 inhibition and ingestion of blood from oral surgery, was the most commonly reported adverse event and the only event reported by ≥ 5% of subjects across treatment groups. These data support further evaluation of JNJ-10450232 (NTM-006) for the treatment of moderate-to-severe pain. CLINICALTRIALS.GOV ID: NCT02209181.

Pharmacokinetics of Nasal Esketamine in Patients with Allergic Rhinitis with and Without Nasal Decongestant Pretreatment and in Healthy Subjects with and Without Nasal Corticosteroid Pretreatment.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Nasal esketamine is indicated for the treatment of adults with treatment-resistant depression and depressive symptoms in adults with major depressive disorder with acute suicidal ideation or behavior. Primary objectives of this study were to evaluate the effect of nasal decongestant pretreatment in patients with allergic rhinitis and the impact of daily nasal corticosteroid administration by healthy subjects on nasal esketamine pharmacokinetics. METHODS: Patients with allergic rhinitis self-administered 56 mg of nasal esketamine after pretreatment with nasal oxymetazoline (0.05%) at 1 h before esketamine and without oxymetazoline pretreatment. They were exposed to grass pollen in an allergen challenge chamber to induce allergic rhinitis symptoms at approximately 2 h before each esketamine administration until 1 h after. Healthy subjects self-administered esketamine (56 mg) before and after administration for 16 consecutive days of mometasone (200 µg), with the second esketamine dose administered 1 h after the last mometasone dose. The plasma pharmacokinetics of esketamine and noresketamine were assessed after each esketamine administration. The tolerability of esketamine, including effects on dissociative and potential psychotomimetic symptoms and level of sedation and suicidal ideation and behavior, was evaluated. RESULTS: The rate of esketamine absorption was slightly greater in patients exhibiting symptoms of allergic rhinitis (decrease in median tmax from 32 min to 22 min). Increases in esketamine Cmax and AUC were also small (mean, ≤ 21%). The pharmacokinetics of esketamine was not affected by oxymetazoline or mometasone pretreatment. Esketamine was well tolerated when it was administered with or without pretreatment of oxymetazoline or mometasone. CONCLUSIONS: Patients exhibiting symptoms of rhinitis may receive nasal esketamine spray without dose adjustment. In addition, esketamine may be administered 1 h after using a nasal decongestant or corticosteroid. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study was registered in the Clinical Trials (NCT02154334) and EudraCT (2014-000534-38) registries.

Model-informed bridging of rivaroxaban doses for thromboprophylaxis in pediatric patients aged 9 years and older with congenital heart disease.

Rivaroxaban is approved in various regions for the treatment of acute venous thromboembolism (VTE) in children aged between 0 and 18 years and was recently investigated for thromboprophylaxis in children aged between 2 and 8 years (with body weights <30 kg) with congenital heart disease who had undergone the Fontan procedure. In the absence of clinical data, rivaroxaban doses for thromboprophylaxis in post-Fontan children aged 9 years and older or ≥30 kg were derived by a bridging approach that used physiologically-based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) and population pharmacokinetic (popPK) models based on pharmacokinetic (PK) data from 588 pediatric patients and from adult patients who received 10 mg once daily for thromboprophylaxis after major orthopedic surgeries as a reference. Both models showed a tendency toward underestimating rivaroxaban exposure in post-Fontan patients aged between 2 and 5 years but accurately described rivaroxaban PK in post-Fontan patients aged between 5 and 8 years. Under the assumption that hepatic function is not impaired in post-Fontan patients, PBPK and popPK simulations indicated that half of the rivaroxaban doses for the same body weight given to pediatric patients treated for acute VTE would yield in pediatric post-Fontan patients exposures similar to the exposure observed in adult patients receiving 10 mg rivaroxaban once daily for thromboprophylaxis. Simulation-derived doses (7.5 mg rivaroxaban once daily for body weights 30-<50 kg and 10 mg once daily for body weights ≥50 kg) were therefore included in the recent US label of rivaroxaban for thromboprophylaxis in children aged 2 years and older with congenital heart disease who have undergone the Fontan procedure.

Prediction of Drug-Drug Interactions After Esketamine Intranasal Administration Using a Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Model.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: A physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) modeling approach for esketamine and its metabolite noresketamine after esketamine intranasal administration was developed to aid the prediction of drug-drug interactions (DDIs) during the clinical development of esketamine nasal spray (SPRAVATO®). This article describes the development of the PBPK model to predict esketamine and noresketamine kinetics after intranasal administration of esketamine and its verification and application in the prediction of prospective DDIs with esketamine using models of index perpetrator and victim drugs. METHODS: The intranasal PBPK (IN-PBPK) models for esketamine/noresketamine were constructed in Simcyp® v14.1 by combining the oral and intravenous esketamine PBPK models, with the dose divided in the ratio 57.7/42.3. Verification of the model was based on comparing the pharmacokinetics and DDI simulations with observed data in healthy volunteers. RESULTS: The simulated and observed (171 healthy volunteers) plasma pharmacokinetic profiles of intranasal esketamine/noresketamine showed a good match. The relative contributions of different cytochromes P450 (CYPs), mainly CYP3A4 and CYP2B6, involved in esketamine/noresketamine clearance was captured correctly in the IN-PBPK model using the DDI clinical studies of intranasal esketamine with clarithromycin and rifampicin and a published DDI study of oral esketamine with ticlopidine. The induction potential of esketamine toward CYP3A4 was also well captured. Inhibition of intranasal esketamine in the presence of ticlopidine was predicted to be not clinically relevant. Different scenarios tested with esketamine as a CYP3A4 perpetrator of midazolam also predicted the absence of clinically relevant CYP3A4 interactions. CONCLUSION: This PBPK model of the intranasal route adequately described the pharmacokinetics and DDI of intranasal esketamine/noresketamine with potential perpetrator and victim drugs. This work was used to support regulatory submissions of SPRAVATO®.

The effects of intranasal esketamine on on-road driving performance in patients with major depressive disorder or persistent depressive disorder.

BACKGROUND: Intranasal esketamine demonstrates rapid improvement of depressive symptoms. However, transient adverse effects (dissociation, sedation and dizziness) may occur, which could impact driving performance. AIMS: To evaluate the effects of 84 mg intranasal esketamine on driving performance in unipolar major depressive disorder (MDD) or persistent depressive disorder (PDD) patients. METHODS: The study consisted of two parts. Part A was a single-blind, double-dummy, randomized three-period, cross-over study to compare effects of esketamine versus placebo on next morning driving, 18 ± 2 h post-treatment. Alcohol was administered to demonstrate assay sensitivity. In Part B, same-day driving, 6 ± 0.5 hours post-treatment, was assessed during twice weekly esketamine administration for 3 weeks. Twenty-seven patients with mild-to-moderate MDD or PDD without psychotic features completed a 100 km on-the-road driving test on a public highway in normal traffic. The primary outcome was standard deviation of lateral position (SDLP; cm; weaving of car). RESULTS: In Part A, alcohol impaired driving performance compared to placebo: Least-square means (95% CI), p-value for delta SDLP (cm) compared with placebo: (ΔSDLP = + 1.83 (1.03; 2.62), p < 0.001), whereas esketamine did not: (ΔSDLP = -0.23 (-1.04; 0.58), p = 0.572). In Part B, weekly driving tests showed no differences between placebo baseline SDLP and after esketamine administration over 3 weeks: Day 11: (ΔSDLP = -0.96 (-3.72; 1.81), p = 0.493), Day 18: (ΔSDLP = -0.56 (-3.33; 2.20), p = 0.686) and Day 25: (ΔSDLP = -1.05 (-3.82; 1.71), p = 0.451). CONCLUSIONS: In this study, esketamine did not impair on-road driving performance the next morning following a single dose, or on same day after repeated administration.

Dosing Regimen Prediction and Confirmation With Rivaroxaban for Thromboprophylaxis in Children After the Fontan Procedure: Insights From the Phase III UNIVERSE Study.

Thrombosis remains an important complication for children with single-ventricle physiology following the Fontan procedure, and effective thromboprophylaxis is an important unmet medical need. To obviate conventional dose-finding studies and expedite clinical development, a rivaroxaban dose regimen for this indication was determined using a model-informed drug development approach. A physiologically based pharmacokinetic rivaroxaban model was used to predict a pediatric dosing regimen that would produce drug exposures similar to that of 10 mg once daily in adults. This regimen was used in an open-label, multicenter phase III study, which investigated the use of rivaroxaban for thromboprophylaxis in post-Fontan patients 2 to 8 years of age. The pharmacokinetics (PK) of rivaroxaban was assessed in part A (n = 12) and in part B (n = 64) of the UNIVERSE study. The safety and efficacy in the rivaroxaban group were compared to those in the acetylsalicylic acid group for 12 months. Pharmacodynamic end points were assessed in both parts of the study. Rivaroxaban exposures achieved in parts A and B were similar to the adult reference exposures. Prothrombin time also showed similarity to the adult reference. Exposure-response analysis did not identify a quantitative relationship between rivaroxaban exposures and efficacy/safety outcomes within the observed exposure ranges. A body weight-based dose regimen selected by physiologically based pharmacokinetic modeling was shown in the UNIVERSE study to be appropriate for thromboprophylaxis in the post-Fontan pediatric population. Model-based dose selection can support pediatric drug development and bridge adult dose data to pediatrics, thereby obviating the need for dose-finding studies in pediatric programs.

Population Pharmacokinetics of Esketamine Nasal Spray and its Metabolite Noresketamine in Healthy Subjects and Patients with Treatment-Resistant Depression.

BACKGROUND: Esketamine nasal spray is approved for treatment-resistant depression. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to characterize the pharmacokinetics of esketamine and noresketamine in healthy subjects and patients with treatment-resistant depression. METHODS: Esketamine and noresketamine were measured in > 9000 plasma samples collected from 820 individuals who received esketamine by the intranasal, intravenous, and oral routes. An open linear model for esketamine (three compartments) and noresketamine (two compartments) that included a hepato-portal compartment was developed using NONMEM® VII. The effects of covariates on esketamine pharmacokinetics and a model evaluation were performed using conventional methods. RESULTS: The fraction of a 28-mg intranasal dose absorbed through the nasal cavity (FRn) is 54% (100% of this fraction is completely absorbed); the remaining 46% is swallowed and undergoes intestinal and first-pass metabolism and 18.6% of the swallowed dose reaches the systemic circulation. The absolute bioavailability of 56 and 84 mg of intranasal esketamine is 54 and 51%, respectively. Esketamine volume at steady state and clearance were 752 L and 114 L/h, respectively. Noresketamine volume at steady state and apparent clearance were 185 L and 38 L/h, respectively. Relative to non-Asian subjects, Asian subjects showed a 64.0 and 19.4% decrease in the esketamine elimination rate constant and noresketamine apparent clearance, respectively. Japanese subjects exhibited a 34% increase in FRn vs other races. Hepatic blood flow decreased by 21.9 L/h for each decade in age in subjects aged > 60 years. These changes resulted in esketamine and noresketamine maximum concentration and area under the concentration-time curve after 24 h post-dose values that were up to 36% higher than those observed in other races or in younger adult subjects. CONCLUSIONS: Esketamine and noresketamine pharmacokinetics was successfully characterized in healthy subjects and patients with treatment-resistant depression. The model quantified esketamine absolute nasal and oral bioavailability, its hepatic flow-limited clearance and biotransformation to the major metabolite noresketamine, and the influence of intrinsic and extrinsic factors on esketamine pharmacokinetics. Clinical trials registration numbers of the studies included in the analysis: ESKETINTRD1001 (NCT01780259), ESKETINTRD1002 (NCT01980303), ESKETINTRD1003 (NCT02129088), ESKETINTRD1008 (NCT02846519), ESKETINTRD1009 (NCT02343289), ESKETINTRD1010 (NCT02568176), ESKETINTRD1012 (NCT02345148), 54135419TRD1015 (NCT02682225), ESKETINTRD2003 (NCT01998958), ESKETINSUI2001 (NCT02133001), ESKETINTRD3001 (NCT02417064), ESKETINTRD3002 (NCT02418585), and ESKETINTRD3005 (NCT02422186).

First evaluation of tapentadol oral solution for the treatment of moderate to severe acute pain in children aged 6 to <18.

BACKGROUND: This is the first clinical trial in the global pediatric clinical development program for the use of the analgesic tapentadol in children and adolescents. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This multicenter, open-label clinical trial investigated pharmacokinetics, safety and tolerability, and efficacy of tapentadol and its major metabolite tapentadol-O-glucuronide after administration of a single dose of tapentadol oral solution (OS) in pediatric patients aged 6 to <18 years experiencing moderate to severe acute pain after surgery. Efficacy (change in pain intensity after tapentadol intake) was assessed in an exploratory manner using the McGrath Color Analog Scale and Faces Pain Scale-Revised. Adverse events were monitored throughout the trial. RESULTS: Forty-four patients who received a single dose of 1 mg/kg tapentadol OS were included in this investigation. Maximum serum concentrations of tapentadol (111 ng/mL) and tapentadol-O-glucuronide (2,400 ng/mL) observed in this trial were within the range of individual maximum concentrations observed in healthy adults administered a comparable dose (range for tapentadol 23.2-129 ng/mL, for tapentadol-O-glucuronide 1,040-4,070 ng/mL). Following tapentadol administration, pain intensity scores improved from baseline at all timepoints. Treatment-emergent adverse events, none of which were serious, were experienced by 45.5% of the patients; the most commonly reported were vomiting (29.5%) and nausea (9.1%). CONCLUSIONS: Tapentadol OS administered as a single dose of 1 mg/kg in children aged 6 to <18 years was generally well tolerated and produced similar serum concentrations as administration of 50-100 mg tapentadol immediate-release tablets in adults. A decrease in postsurgical pain was observed using exploratory subject-reported pain assessments. Tapentadol OS may provide a new treatment option in the management of moderate to severe acute pain in children and adolescents.

Fatty Acid Amide Hydrolase Inhibition by JNJ-42165279: A Multiple-Ascending Dose and a Positron Emission Tomography Study in Healthy Volunteers.

Inhibition of fatty acid amide hydrolase (FAAH) potentiates endocannabinoid activity and is hypothesized to have therapeutic potential for mood and anxiety disorders and pain. The clinical profile of JNJ-42165279, an oral selective FAAH inhibitor, was assessed by investigating the pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, safety, and binding to FAAH in the brain of healthy human volunteers. Concentrations of JNJ-42165279 (plasma, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), urine) and fatty acid amides (FAA; plasma, CSF), and FAAH activity in leukocytes was determined in a phase I multiple ascending dose study. A positron emission tomography study with the FAAH tracer [11 C]MK3168 was conducted to determine brain FAAH occupancy after single and multiple doses of JNJ-42165279. JNJ-42165279 administration resulted in an increase in plasma and CSF FAA. Significant blocking of brain FAAH binding of [11 C]MK3168 was observed after pretreatment with JNJ-42165279. JNJ-42165279 produces potent central and peripheral FAAH inhibition. Saturation of brain FAAH occupancy occurred with doses ≥10 mg of JNJ-42165279. No safety concerns were identified.

Effect of intranasal esketamine on cognitive functioning in healthy participants: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study.

BACKGROUND: The effect of intranasal esketamine on cognitive functioning in healthy participants is assessed in this study. METHODS: Twenty-four participants (19-49 years) were randomized to one of two treatment sequences in which either esketamine 84 mg or placebo was intranasally administered in a double-blind, two-period crossover design. Primary measures included five tests of Cogstate® computerized test battery assessed at 1 h predose and 40 min, 2, 4, and 6 h postdose. Secondary measures included the Mental Effort Scale, Karolinska Sleepiness Scale (KSS), and safety. RESULTS: Esketamine was associated with significant cognitive performance impairment at 40 min postdose for all five Cogstate® tests (Detection p = 0.0011, Identification p = 0.0006, One-Card Learning p = 0.0040, One Back p = 0.0017, and Groton Maze Learning Test p < 0.0001) versus placebo. In contrast, performance on these tests did not differ significantly between esketamine and placebo at 2, 4, or 6 h postdose. Secondary outcomes indicated a significant, transient increase from baseline under esketamine versus placebo at 40 min postdose on the Mental Effort Scale and at 40 min and 2 h postdose on KSS (p < 0.0001 for both); however, no significant difference was observed on these outcomes between esketamine and placebo at later timepoints. The most commonly reported adverse events were dizziness (67%), nausea (37.5%), disturbance in attention (29.2%), and fatigue (29.2%); the majority were considered mild in severity. CONCLUSIONS: Esketamine was associated with cognitive performance decline, and greater effort was required to complete the test battery versus placebo at 40 min postdose, which returned to placebo-comparable levels by 2 h postdose. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02094378.

Quantifying the Exposure of Tapentadol Extended Release in Japanese Patients with Cancer Pain and Bridging Tapentadol Pharmacokinetics Across Populations Using a Modeling Approach.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Tapentadol extended release (ER) is approved for the management of chronic and acute pain in adults. There has been no report of tapentadol ER pharmacokinetics in subjects with cancer pain. This analysis investigated tapentadol ER pharmacokinetics in Japanese patients with cancer pain and bridged it with the pharmacokinetics in Japanese healthy subjects and Caucasian patients with cancer pain. METHODS: Nonlinear mixed-effect pharmacokinetic modeling was conducted based on pooled tapentadol ER concentration data collected in five Phase 1 studies from 138 Japanese and Korean healthy subjects and in two Phase 3 studies from 215 Japanese and Korean subjects with cancer pain. Expected tapentadol exposure in subjects with different characteristics was assessed via simulation. Tapentadol ER exposures in Caucasian populations were compared with those in corresponding Japanese populations. RESULTS: Tapentadol ER pharmacokinetics in Japanese cancer-pain patients were adequately described by a time-invariant, one-compartment disposition model with two input functions and first-order elimination. Weight, age, and albumin were identified as statistically significant covariates, but do not warrant dose adjustment. Comparable pharmacokinetics were shown between Japanese healthy and Caucasian healthy subjects, and between Japanese cancer-pain patients and Caucasian cancer-pain patients. CONCLUSION: The apparent differences in the estimated individual pharmacokinetic parameters in Japanese healthy subjects and Japanese cancer-pain patients taking tapentadol ER were explained by covariates incorporated in a unified pharmacokinetic model. Population modeling was essential in this cross-population bridging analysis.

Pharmacokinetic evaluation of tapentadol extended-release tablets in healthy subjects.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate serum pharmacokinetics of tapentadol administered to healthy subjects as extended-release (ER) tablets. DESIGN: Seven single-dose studies (five randomized, crossover, bioequivalence studies; a study in Japanese men; and a randomized, crossover, effects-of-food study) and one repeated-dose study. SETTING: Clinical research settings in the United States and The Netherlands. PATIENTS OR PARTICIPANTS: Healthy males and females were enrolled into seven studies; one study enrolled only Japanese males. INTERVENTIONS: In the bioequivalence studies, subjects first received one polyethylene oxide- or hypromellose-based tapentadol ER tablet (50, 100, 150, 200, or 250 mg; one dose per study), then (after washout) the other formulation (matching dose). In all other studies, subjects received polyethylene oxide-based tapentadol ER tablets. In the repeated-dose study, subjects received one 250 mg tablet, then (after washout) one 250 mg tablet every 12 hours (five doses). In the food-effect study, subjects received one 250 mg tablet within 30 minutes after a high-fat meal or after 10 hours of fasting. In the study in Japanese men, subjects received one 100 mg tablet. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Maximum tapentadol concentrations (Cmax) were typically observed 5 hours after dosing. Mean terminal half-life values ranged from 4.4 to 5.9 hours. Tapentadol Cmax and AUC values increased proportionally following single ER (polyethylene oxide-based tablets) doses of 50 to 250 mg. Trough tapentadol concentrations increased during repeat dosing until reaching steady-state by the third dose. Serum Cmax and area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) values at steady state were 1.6 and 1.9 times higher relative to single-dose administration. Coadministration of the 250 mg dose with a high-fat meal increased Cmax and AUC values by an average of < 17 percent. CONCLUSIONS: The pharmacokinetics of tapentadol ER are consistent after repeated and single-dose administration. Tapentadol ER may be administered without regard to food intake. No clinically significant differences were observed in the pharmacokinetics of tapentadol between Japanese and Caucasian subjects.

A phase I trial and pharmacokinetic study of a 24-hour infusion of trabectedin (Yondelis®, ET-743) in children and adolescents with relapsed or refractory solid tumors.

BACKGROUND: The objectives of this phase I study were to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), toxicity profile, and pharmacokinetics of a 24-hour continuous intravenous infusion of trabectedin administered to children and adolescents with refractory or relapsed solid tumors. PROCEDURE: Patients between the ages of 4 and 16 years old with refractory solid tumors received trabectedin as a 24-hour infusion every 21 days. Dexamethasone and prophylactic growth factor support were administered with each cycle. Pharmacokinetic studies were conducted during cycle 1. RESULTS: Patients (n = 12) median (range) age 14.5 (8-16) years received trabectedin at 1.1 (n = 3), 1.5 (n = 6), or 1.7 (n = 3) mg/m(2). At the 1.5 mg/m(2) dose level, one patient had dose limiting anorexia and fatigue. At 1.7 mg/m(2), two patients experienced dose limiting toxicity, dehydration, and gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase elevation. Non-dose limiting toxicities included elevated serum transaminases, myelosuppression, nausea, emesis, and fatigue. Plasma pharmacokinetic parameters were similar to historical data in adults. One partial response was observed in a patient with neuroendocrine carcinoma. Stable disease (≥6 cycles) was achieved in three patients (osteosarcoma n = 2, desmoplastic small round cell tumor n = 1). CONCLUSIONS: The MTD of trabectedin in pediatric patients with refractory solid tumors is 1.5 mg/m(2) IV over 24 hours every 21 days. Dexamethasone to ameliorate hepatic toxicity and prophylactic growth factor support are required.

Effect of mild and moderate hepatic impairment on the pharmacokinetics and safety of carisbamate.

This open-label, parallel-group study was designed to characterize the pharmacokinetics (PK) of carisbamate in participants with mild or moderate hepatic impairment versus those with normal hepatic function. Healthy (n = 10) and hepatic-impaired (n = 20) participants received a single 200-mg oral dose of carisbamate. Serial PK blood samples were collected up to 120 hours postdose. A modest increase in mean area under the plasma concentration-time curve from 0 to infinity (AUC(∞)) was observed for the mild impairment group compared with the normal group (ratio of geometric means ~116%), while mean maximum plasma concentration (C(max)) values were similar (ratio of geometric means ~94%). The AUC(∞) value for the moderate hepatic-impaired group was approximately 207% that of the normal group, while there was a smaller increase in C(max) (~118%) compared with the normal group. Mean half-life (t(1/2)) values were prolonged in the moderate impairment group (21 hours) relative to the normal group (11 hours). There was a decrease in apparent clearance (CL/F) and an increase in AUC(∞u) (AUC(∞) × % drug unbound). The percentage of carisbamate unbound to proteins did not change across the groups, suggesting the increases in AUC(∞) were due to decreased intrinsic hepatic clearance. Carisbamate 200 mg was well tolerated.

Effect of carisbamate on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of warfarin in healthy participants.

Carisbamate's effect (200 mg twice-daily [study 1], 600 mg twice-daily [study 2]) on warfarin's (25 mg single dose) pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics (international normalized ratio) was assessed during 2 open-label studies in healthy participants. Coadministration of either carisbamate regimen produced small changes on the mean maximum plasma concentration (C(max)) and mean area under the plasma concentration-time curve to the last measurable time point (AUC(last)) of (S)- and (R)-warfarin, which are unlikely to be clinically significant. For (S)-warfarin, the ratios (with carisbamate/without carisbamate) of geometric means for C(max) were 105.44 (study 1) and 98.48 (study 2) and for AUC(last) were 109.33 (study 1) and 114.43 (study 2); the corresponding 90% confidence intervals were within the bioequivalence limits of 80% to 125%. Results were similar for (R)-warfarin. Carisbamate at 600 mg (but not 200 mg) twice-daily prolonged the elimination half-life of (S)- and (R)-warfarin by ~10 hours (25% and 32% increase, respectively). Prothrombin time was unaltered by either carisbamate dose. Adverse events with the highest incidence were dizziness (50%) and headache (50%) in study 1 and somnolence (56%) in study 2. Warfarin exposure and international normalized ratio were unaffected by coadministration of carisbamate 200 mg or 600 mg twice-daily. Carisbamate was well tolerated.

Cognitive effects of carisbamate in randomized, placebo-controlled, healthy-volunteer, multidose studies.

Adverse cognitive effects are an important concern for drugs that influence the central nervous system. Carisbamate is a novel drug in development for treatment of seizures and neuropathic pain. Information on its cognitive effects is limited. Three controlled, multiple-dose, crossover studies with treatment durations of 5-9 days were designed to examine the cognitive effects of carisbamate on healthy volunteers. In one study, apparent dose-dependent effects on response, vigilance, and recognition speed were observed (1000 mg and 1500 mg/day). Carisbamate did not differ from placebo for most variables in the other two studies, but increased reaction time and reduced Sternberg memory were seen at higher dosages. Carisbamate did not produce clinically significant adverse effects on cognitive performance at doses <1000 mg/day. Effects were mild to modest at the higher doses tested.

Pharmacokinetics and tolerability of rabeprazole in children 1 to 11 years old with gastroesophageal reflux disease.

BACKGROUND: The pharmacokinetics of rabeprazole after a single oral dose and once-daily administration for 5 consecutive days was characterized in children 1 to 11 years old with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). PATIENTS AND METHODS: The initial 8 patients received rabeprazole sodium (hereafter referred to as rabeprazole) 0.14 mg/kg (part 1); the next 20 patients were randomized to receive 0.5 or 1 mg/kg (part 2) to target concentrations in plasma expected to be safe and effective. Pharmacokinetic parameters of rabeprazole and the thioether metabolite were calculated using noncompartmental methods. Subjective evaluations of GERD severity, rabeprazole short-term effectiveness, palatability, and safety were also characterized. RESULTS: Rabeprazole concentrations increased in a dose-dependent manner. Little or no accumulation was observed after repeated administration. The results suggest that formation of the thioether is an important metabolic pathway in young patients, which is consistent with adults. Plasma area under the concentration-time curve values of rabeprazole and the metabolite were poorly correlated with individual age and body weight. Furthermore, oral rabeprazole clearance values (not adjusted for weight) were similar to historical adult data. However, weight-adjusted values were higher for the pediatric patients, and approximately 2 to 3 times the milligram per kilogram dose of rabeprazole in these children was necessary to achieve comparable concentrations in adults. Subjective evaluations demonstrated an improvement of GERD symptoms in most patients after rabeprazole treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Palatability of the formulation was reported to be good or excellent. Rabeprazole was well tolerated, with no notable differences in safety among the dose groups.

Phase 1 trial and pharmacokinetic study of the farnesyl transferase inhibitor tipifarnib in children and adolescents with refractory leukemias: a report from the Children's Oncology Group.

BACKGROUND: The objectives of this trial were to define the toxicity profile, dose, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of the farnesyl transferase (FTase) inhibitor, tipifarnib, in children and adolescents with hematological malignancies. PROCEDURE: Tipifarnib was administered twice daily for 21 days, repeated every 28 days starting at a dose of 300 mg/m(2) /dose. Pharmacokinetic sampling was performed for 36 hr after the first dose and leukemic blasts were collected pre-treatment and at steady state for determination of FTase activity. RESULTS: Of 29 patients enrolled, 18 were fully evaluable for toxicity, and 23 for response; 26 had pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic sampling. The recommended dose is 300 mg/m(2) /dose and toxicities included skin rash, mucositis, nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea. Neurotoxicity, which was dose-limiting in adults at doses exceeding 600 mg/dose, was infrequent and mild. The plasma pharmacokinetics of tipifarnib were highly variable but comparable to adults with acute leukemia and children with solid tumors. The median apparent clearance of tipifarnib was 630 ml/min/m(2) and the median half-life was 4.7 hr. At steady state on 300 mg/m(2) /dose, FTase activity was inhibited by 82% in leukemic blasts. No objective responses were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Oral tipifarnib is well tolerated in children with leukemia on a twice daily for 2 days schedule at 300 mg/m(2) /dose.