Ten-year experience of bone SBRT in breast cancer: analysis of predictive factors of effectiveness.

PURPOSE: Data on the benefit of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) in patients with breast cancer (BC) and bone metastases remain limited. The purpose of this study is to report our 10-year experience of bone SBRT, analyzing toxicity and prognostic factors for local control (LC); progression-free survival, and overall survival (OS). METHODS/PATIENTS: We analyzed all spine and non-spine bone SBRT performed in patients with BC during the 2012-2022 period at our institution. Treatments carried out with ablative intent in stereotactic conditions with dose/fraction ≥ 5 Gy in 5 or fewer sessions were considered. Demographic, treatment, and toxicity data were recorded according to CTCAEv4. Risk factors were assessed through univariate and multivariate analysis by Cox regression. RESULTS: 60 bone SBRT treatments were performed during the study period. 75% were spine SBRT and 25% were non-spine SBRT (median BED4Gy was 80 Gy4). The median age was 52.5 years (34-79). The median tumor volume was 2.9 cm3 (0.5-39.4). The median follow-up was 32.4 months (1.2-101.7). 1 and 2 years LC were 92.9 and 86.6%, respectively. 1 and 2 years OS were 100 and 90.6%, respectively. Multivariate analysis (MVA) associated volume of the treated lesion ≥ 13 cm3 with worse LC (p = 0.046; HR 12.1, 95%CI = 1.1-140.3). In addition, deferring SBRT > 3 months after lesion diagnosis to prioritize systemic treatment showed a significant benefit, improving the 2 years LC up to 96.8% vs. 67.5% for SBRT performed before this period (p = 0.031; HR 0.1, 95%CI = 0.01-0.8). Hormonal receptors, the total number of metastases, and CA15-3 value were significantly associated with OS in MVA. During follow-up, three non-spine fractures (5%) were observed. CONCLUSIONS: According to our data, bone SBRT is a safe and effective technique for BC. Upfront systemic treatment before SBRT offers a benefit in LC. Therefore, SBRT should be considered after prior systemic treatment in this population.

Association between EBRT dose volume histograms and quality of life in prostate cancer patients.

AIM: To evaluate the association between dose-volume histogram (DVH) values in organs at risk (OAR) and patient-reported HRQoL outcomes. BACKGROUND: Data on the association between DVHs and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in prostate cancer (PCa) patients are limited. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Five-year follow-up study of 154 patients with organ-confined (stage T1/T2) PCa treated with EBRT between January 2003 and November 2005. HRQoL was evaluated with the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index (EPIC). DVH for OARs (penile bulb, rectum and bladder) were created for all patients for whom data were available (119/154; 77%). The functional data analysis (FDA) statistical method was used. HRQoL data was collected prospectively and data analysis was performed retrospectively. RESULTS: Worsening of urinary incontinence and obstructive symptoms correlated with higher DVH dose distributions at 24 months. Increased rectal bleeding at months 24 and 60 correlated with higher DVH dose distributions in the 40-70 Gy range. Patients with deterioration in rectal incontinence presented a higher DVH distribution range than patients without rectal incontinence. Penile bulb DVH values and erectile dysfunction were not significantly associated. CONCLUSIONS: DVH parameters and post-radiotherapy HRQoL appear to be closely correlated, underscoring the importance of assessing DVH values prior to initiating EBRT to determine the risk of developing HRQoL related adverse effects. Advanced treatment modalities may be appropriate in high risk cases to minimize treatment-related toxicity and to improve treatment outcomes and HRQoL. Future studies are needed to better elucidate the association between pre-treatment DVH parameters in organs at risk and subsequent HRQoL.

Phase II Trial of SBRT for Stage I NSCLC: Survival, Local Control, and Lung Function at 36 Months.

OBJECTIVES: The long-term impact of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) on respiratory function in patients with inoperable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has not been well studied. The aim of this phase II trial was to assess local control, survival, and lung function at 36 months after treatment. METHODS: From July 2008 to February 2012, 42 patients in whom inoperable NSCLC with peripheral lesions was diagnosed were consecutively enrolled. Lung function testing included measurement of forced expiratory vital capacity, forced expiratory volume in 1 second, and diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide. All lung function parameters were registered at baseline and evaluated prospectively after SBRT every 6 months for 2 years and annually thereafter. RESULTS: Of the 42 initial patients, four were excluded. At 36 months after SBRT, 22 patients were still evaluable (12 deaths and four patients lost to follow-up). At 36 months, the rate of local control was 94%. At 1, 2, and 3 years, respectively, overall survival rates were 92%, 75%, and 66%. Median overall survival was 57 months. Grade (G) 3 acute toxicity was observed in four patients (10%). Chronic G1 toxicity was observed in all 38 cases (100%), with the most common type being pneumonitis (26 patients [68%]). The mean lung function parameters at baseline and at 36 months after treatment were as follows: forced expiratory vital capacity 83% versus 79%; forced expiratory volume in 1 second 62% versus 57%; and diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide 54% versus 54%. These changes were not significant. CONCLUSIONS: In this trial, local control and survival rates after SBRT were very good. Treatment with SBRT had no significant impact on lung function at 36 months. These findings provide further support for the use of SBRT as a radical treatment for NSCLC. Lung toxicity is minimal, even in patients with poor pulmonary function before treatment.