The risk of delayed spinal cord injury in pediatric spinal deformity surgery.

Delayed spinal cord injury (SCI) hours or days after surgery, with uneventful monitoring and initial normal postoperative neurological examination, is a rare complication. Based on anecdotal evidence, the risk of delayed spinal cord injury might be higher than previously assumed. Therefore the aim of this study was to determine the risk of delayed SCI after pediatric spinal deformity surgery between 2013-2019 in the Netherlands. The total number of pediatric spinal deformity surgeries performed for scoliosis or kyphosis between 2013-2019 was obtained from the Dutch National Registration of Hospital Care. All eleven Dutch hospitals that perform pediatric spinal deformity surgery were contacted for occurrence of delayed SCI. From the identified patients with delayed SCI, the following data were collected: patient characteristics, details about the SCI, the surgical procedure, management and degree of improvement.2884 pediatric deformity surgeries were identified between 2013-2019. Seven patients (0.24%) with delayed SCI were reported: 3 idiopathic, 2 neuromuscular (including 1 kypho-scoliosis) and 2 syndromic scoliosis. The risk of delayed SCI after pediatric deformity surgery was 1:595 in idiopathic scoliosis, 1:214 in syndromic scoliosis, 1:201 in neuromuscular scoliosis. All seven patients had a documented normal neurological examination in the first postoperative period; neurological deficits were first diagnosed at a median 16h (range 2.5-40) after surgery. The risk of delayed SCI after pediatric deformity surgery is higher than previously reported, especially in patients with non-idiopathic scoliosis. Regular postoperative testing for late neurologic deficit should be performed for timely diagnosis and management of this devastating complication.

Surgeon equipoise as an inclusion criterion for the evaluation of nonoperative versus operative treatment of thoracolumbar spinal injuries.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Prospective studies have failed to demonstrate the superiority of either operative or nonoperative treatment of thoracolumbar fractures. Similar to other surgical fields, research has been limited by the variability in surgical interventions, difficult recruitment, infrequent pathology, and the urgency of interventions. PURPOSE: To outline factors precluding randomized controlled trials in spinal fractures research, and describe a novel methodology that seeks to improve on the design of observational studies. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: A preliminary report describing an observational study design with clinical equipoise as an inclusion criterion. The proposed methodology is a cohort study with head-to-head comparison of operative and nonoperative treatment regimens in an expertise-based trial fashion. Patients are selected retrospectively by an expert panel and clinical outcomes are assessed to compare competing treatment regimens. Surgeon equipoise served as an inclusion criterion. PATIENT SAMPLE: Patients with closed or open thoracolumbar spinal fracture with or without neurological impairment, presenting to one of two different trauma centers between 1991 and 2005 (N = 760). OUTCOME MEASURES: Homogeneity of baseline clinical and demographic data and distribution of prognostic risk factors between the operative and the nonoperative cohort. METHODS: Patients treated for spine fractures at two University hospitals practicing opposing methods of fracture intervention were identified by medical diagnosis code searches (n = 760). A panel of spine treatment experts, blinded to the treatment received clinically has assessed each case retrospectively. Patients were included in the study when there was disagreement on the preferred treatment, that is, operative or nonoperative treatment of the injury. Baseline and initial data of a study evaluating nonoperative versus operative spinal fracture treatment are presented. RESULTS: One hundred and ninety patients were included in the study accounting for a panel discordance rate of 29%. The distribution of baseline characteristics and demographics of the study populations were equal across the parallel cohorts enrolled in the study, that is, no differences in prognostic factors were observed. CONCLUSIONS: The use of clinical equipoise as an inclusion criterion in comparative studies may be used to avoid selection bias. Using multivariate analysis of retrospectively assembled parallel cohorts, a valid comparison of operative and nonoperative spine fracture treatment strategies and their outcomes is possible.

Scoliosis in Prader-Willi syndrome: prevalence, effects of age, gender, body mass index, lean body mass and genotype.

BACKGROUND: The reported prevalence of scoliosis in children with Prader-Willi syndrome varies from 15% to 86%. OBJECTIVE: To study the prevalence of scoliosis and the effects of age, gender, body mass index (BMI), total lean body mass (LBM), LBM of the trunk (trunkLBM) and genotype. DESIGN: Radiographs were taken, length and weight were measured (BMI standard deviation scores (BMI SDS) and body surface area (BSA)), and dual energy x-ray absorptiometry was performed, measuring LBM and trunkLBM. PATIENTS: 96 children, median (interquartile range) age 4.8 years (2.1 to 7.5), were included in a multicentre study. None received growth hormone treatment. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Two types of scoliosis were identified: (1) long C-curve type scoliosis (LCS) and (2) idiopathic scoliosis (IS). Children were divided into age categories (infants, 0-3 years; juveniles, 3-10 years; adolescents, 10-16 years). RESULTS: The prevalence of scoliosis was 37.5% and increased with age (infants and juveniles, approximately 30%; adolescents, 80%); 44% of children with scoliosis had a Cobb angle above 20 degrees . Children with scoliosis were significantly older than those without. Children with LCS were younger and more hypotonic than those with IS: median (interquartile range) age 4.4 years (1.7-5.9) vs 11.1 years (6.5-12.1) (p = 0.002) and trunkLBM/BSA ratio 7080 (6745-7571) vs 7830 (6932-8157) (p = 0.043). CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of scoliosis in children with Prader-Willi syndrome is high (37.5%). Many children with scoliosis (13%) had undergone brace treatment or surgery. The type of scoliosis is affected by age and trunkLBM/BSA ratio.