RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Elderly patients with Chronic Limb Threatening Ischemia (CLTI) undergoing revascularization are prone to delirium and prolonged hospitalization. Preoperative prehabilitation may prevent delirium and reduce the length of stay. This study investigates the effect of multimodal prehabilitation on delirium incidence in elderly CLTI patients undergoing revascularization. METHODS: A comparative observational cohort study conducted in a large teaching hospital (intervention cohort n=101, retrospective control cohort n=207) and a university hospital (prospective control cohort n=48) from 2020 to 2023. Patients aged ≥ 65 years undergoing revascularization were included, with acute treatment or severe cognitive impairment as exclusion criteria. The three-week prehabilitation program included screening of general health and presence of delirium risk factors by a vascular nurse practitioner, screening and provision of personalized, home-based exercises by a physiotherapist, provision of nutritional advice by a dietician, and if indicated comprehensive geriatric assessment by a geriatrician, assessment of self-reliance and home situation by a prearranged homecare nurse, guidance and support for smoking cessation by a quit smoking coach, and anaemia treatment. Primary outcome was 30-day delirium incidence, analysed using regression models adjusting for potential confounders (age, physical impairment, history of delirium, preoperative anaemia and revascularization type). Secondary outcomes were length of stay, postoperative complications, 30-day mortality, and patient experiences. RESULTS: Median age (IQR) was 76 years (71-82). Delirium incidence was lower in the prehabilitation cohort (n=2/101, 2%) compared to controls (n=23/255, 9%; OR=0.21, 95%CI 0.05-0.89, p=.04). Adjusted analysis showed a non-significant delirium reduction (OR=0.28, 95%CI 0.06-1.3, p=.097). The prehabilitation cohort had a significantly shorter length of stay (2 [1-5] vs 4 [2-9] days; p=<.001), and fewer minor complications (14% vs 26%, p=.01). No differences were present in major complications and 30-day mortality. Patients reported high compliance and satisfaction (median score 8/10, IQR 7-9). CONCLUSIONS: Prehabilitation among elderly CLTI patients is safe and has the potential to yield multiple beneficial effects on general outcomes following revascularization, while also achieving high levels of patient satisfaction. Further validation and considering implementation in surgical settings is recommended.
RESUMEN
Informal caregivers play a significant role in providing care for older, often vulnerable, patients, and supporting them as they live with chronic diseases. Due to the rising prevalence of older vascular patients and their use of healthcare, the role of their informal caregivers will become more important. However, little is known about the experiences of informal caregivers of patients with critical limb-threatening ischemia and the impact of informal care on different aspects of these caregivers' lives. In addition, literature does not describe the burden this role brings with it, or lack thereof. Therefore a qualitative study using a phenomenological approach, specifically interpretive phenomenological analysis, was used to gain insight into the experiences of the primary informal caregivers of patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia. Data were collected via semi-structured interviews and focus groups discussions. Fifteen primary informal caregivers of patients with critical limb-threatening ischemia under the care of the vascular surgeon at a tertiary teaching hospital in the Netherlands were included. Data analysis yielded three themes: the perceived identity of this group of caregivers; the varying intensity of informal care; and the collaboration between informal carers, their care recipients and the professional care provider within the vascular surgery department. In contrast to carers of other chronic diseases, the shifting intensity of care that informal caregivers of critical limb-threatening ischemia patients experience seems to prevent long-term overload. Adapting to that fluctuating situation requires flexibility from healthcare providers within the vascular surgery department. In addition, professionals need to involve informal caregivers in the patient's decision-making process and recognize their role in that process.
Asunto(s)
Cuidadores , Isquemia , Investigación Cualitativa , Humanos , Cuidadores/psicología , Masculino , Femenino , Isquemia/psicología , Anciano , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Adulto , Países Bajos , Extremidades/irrigación sanguíneaRESUMEN
Objective: Delirium is a common and serious postoperative complication in elderly patients undergoing abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair and is associated with a variety of adverse outcomes. Multimodal prehabilitation aims to identify and minimize potential risk factors for delirium and improve overall health. The aim of this study is to investigate the effect of multimodal prehabilitation on delirium incidence in elderly patients undergoing elective repair for AAA. Methods: A single-centre cohort analysis was performed in the Netherlands for patients aged ≥70 years, undergoing elective repair for AAA (open surgery and endovascular aortic repair). Prehabilitation was gradually introduced between 2016 and 2019 and offered as standard care from 2019. The program was constructed to optimize overall health and included delirium risk assessment, home-based tailor-made exercises by a physical therapist, nutritional optimization by a dietician, iron infusion in case of anaemia and a comprehensive geriatric assessment by a geriatrician in case of frailty. The primary outcome was incidence of delirium within 30 days after surgery. Results: A total of 81 control and 123 prehabilitation patients were included. A reduction in incidence of delirium was found (11.1% in the control group to 4.9% in the prehabilitation group), with too small numbers to reach statistical significance (p=0.09). Also, patients in the prehabilitation group had a small, non-significant decreased length of hospital stay (4 days) compared to the control group (5 days) (p=0.07). Conclusion: Although no significant differences were found, we carefully conclude that this study provides some support for implementing multimodal prehabilitation for delirium prevention in elderly patients undergoing AAA repair. Further research with larger cohorts is necessary to identify and select patients that would most benefit from prehabilitation.
Asunto(s)
Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal , Delirio , Anciano , Humanos , Aorta Abdominal , Ejercicio Preoperatorio , Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal/cirugía , Estudios de Cohortes , Factores de Riesgo , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Electivos/efectos adversos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/prevención & control , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Delirio/epidemiología , Delirio/etiología , Delirio/prevención & control , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
Importance: Postoperative delirium (POD) is a common and serious complication after surgery. Various predisposing factors are associated with POD, but their magnitude and importance using an individual patient data (IPD) meta-analysis have not been assessed. Objective: To identify perioperative factors associated with POD and assess their relative prognostic value among adults undergoing noncardiac surgery. Data Sources: MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CINAHL from inception to May 2020. Study Selection: Studies were included that (1) enrolled adult patients undergoing noncardiac surgery, (2) assessed perioperative risk factors for POD, and (3) measured the incidence of delirium (measured using a validated approach). Data were analyzed in 2020. Data Extraction and Synthesis: Individual patient data were pooled from 21 studies and 1-stage meta-analysis was performed using multilevel mixed-effects logistic regression after a multivariable imputation via chained equations model to impute missing data. Main Outcomes and Measures: The end point of interest was POD diagnosed up to 10 days after a procedure. A wide range of perioperative risk factors was considered as potentially associated with POD. Results: A total of 192 studies met the eligibility criteria, and IPD were acquired from 21 studies that enrolled 8382 patients. Almost 1 in 5 patients developed POD (18%), and an increased risk of POD was associated with American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) status 4 (odds ratio [OR], 2.43; 95% CI, 1.42-4.14), older age (OR for 65-85 years, 2.67; 95% CI, 2.16-3.29; OR for >85 years, 6.24; 95% CI, 4.65-8.37), low body mass index (OR for body mass index <18.5, 2.25; 95% CI, 1.64-3.09), history of delirium (OR, 3.9; 95% CI, 2.69-5.66), preoperative cognitive impairment (OR, 3.99; 95% CI, 2.94-5.43), and preoperative C-reactive protein levels (OR for 5-10 mg/dL, 2.35; 95% CI, 1.59-3.50; OR for >10 mg/dL, 3.56; 95% CI, 2.46-5.17). Completing a college degree or higher was associated with a decreased likelihood of developing POD (OR 0.45; 95% CI, 0.28-0.72). Conclusions and Relevance: In this systematic review and meta-analysis of individual patient data, several important factors associated with POD were found that may help identify patients at high risk and may have utility in clinical practice to inform patients and caregivers about the expected risk of developing delirium after surgery. Future studies should explore strategies to reduce delirium after surgery.
Asunto(s)
Delirio , Delirio del Despertar , Adulto , Humanos , Delirio del Despertar/epidemiología , Delirio del Despertar/etiología , Delirio/epidemiología , Delirio/etiología , Delirio/diagnóstico , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/diagnóstico , Factores de Riesgo , PacientesRESUMEN
Importance: Staphylococcus aureus surgical site infections (SSIs) and bloodstream infections (BSIs) are important complications of surgical procedures for which prevention remains suboptimal. Contemporary data on the incidence of and etiologic factors for these infections are needed to support the development of improved preventive strategies. Objectives: To assess the occurrence of postoperative S aureus SSIs and BSIs and quantify its association with patient-related and contextual factors. Design, Setting, and Participants: This multicenter cohort study assessed surgical patients at 33 hospitals in 10 European countries who were recruited between December 16, 2016, and September 30, 2019 (follow-up through December 30, 2019). Enrolled patients were actively followed up for up to 90 days after surgery to assess the occurrence of S aureus SSIs and BSIs. Data analysis was performed between November 20, 2020, and April 21, 2022. All patients were 18 years or older and had undergone 11 different types of surgical procedures. They were screened for S aureus colonization in the nose, throat, and perineum within 30 days before surgery (source population). Both S aureus carriers and noncarriers were subsequently enrolled in a 2:1 ratio. Exposure: Preoperative S aureus colonization. Main Outcomes and Measures: The main outcome was cumulative incidence of S aureus SSIs and BSIs estimated for the source population, using weighted incidence calculation. The independent association of candidate variables was estimated using multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression models. Results: In total, 5004 patients (median [IQR] age, 66 [56-72] years; 2510 [50.2%] female) were enrolled in the study cohort; 3369 (67.3%) were S aureus carriers. One hundred patients developed S aureus SSIs or BSIs within 90 days after surgery. The weighted cumulative incidence of S aureus SSIs or BSIs was 2.55% (95% CI, 2.05%-3.12%) for carriers and 0.52% (95% CI, 0.22%-0.91%) for noncarriers. Preoperative S aureus colonization (adjusted hazard ratio [AHR], 4.38; 95% CI, 2.19-8.76), having nonremovable implants (AHR, 2.00; 95% CI, 1.15-3.49), undergoing mastectomy (AHR, 5.13; 95% CI, 1.87-14.08) or neurosurgery (AHR, 2.47; 95% CI, 1.09-5.61) (compared with orthopedic surgery), and body mass index (AHR, 1.05; 95% CI, 1.01-1.08 per unit increase) were independently associated with S aureus SSIs and BSIs. Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study of surgical patients, S aureus carriage was associated with an increased risk of developing S aureus SSIs and BSIs. Both modifiable and nonmodifiable etiologic factors were associated with this risk and should be addressed in those at increased S aureus SSI and BSI risk.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama , Infecciones Estafilocócicas , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Neoplasias de la Mama/complicaciones , Estudios de Cohortes , Mastectomía , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/prevención & control , Staphylococcus aureus , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/prevención & control , Persona de Mediana EdadRESUMEN
PURPOSE: The purpose of the study is to ascertain endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) suitability in relation to stent-graft-specific instructions for use (IFU) in patients with a ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (RAAA). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Using the preoperative computed tomography angiography (CTA), the aortic morphology of patients undergoing surgical repair of a RAAA in 2 Dutch hospitals between January 2014 and December 2019 was retrospectively assessed. Three-dimensional and central luminal line reconstructions were used. Anatomical suitability was defined according to the IFU of the stent graft system used. RESULTS: Of 128 included patients, 112 (88%) were men and the mean age was 74.1 (SD=7.6) years. Anatomy within IFU for EVAR was present in 31 patients (24%). Overall, 94 patients (73%) were treated with open surgical repair (OSR) and 34 patients (27%) were treated with EVAR. Anatomy within IFU was present in 15 OSR patients (16%) and 16 EVAR patients (47%). In patients with anatomy outside of IFU, 90% (87/97) had unsuitable neck anatomy and 64% (62/97) had insufficient neck length. An unsuitable distal iliac landing zone was observed in 35 patients. Perioperative mortality was 27% (34/128), with no difference between OSR and EVAR (25/94 vs 9/34; p=0.989). CONCLUSION: Most RAAA patients in this series did not have aortic anatomy within IFU for EVAR, mainly due to insufficient neck length. However, whether anatomy outside of IFU equates to unsuitability for EVAR in an emergency setting remains a matter of debate and warrants further research. CLINICAL IMPACT: The treatment of a ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm can consist of endovascular repair or open repair. Retrospective anatomical assessment shows that most patients do not have anatomy inside the instructions for use for endovascular aneurysm repair, mainly due to insufficient neck length. Whether anatomy outside the instructions for use equates unsuitability for endovascular aneurysm repair remains a matter of debate.
RESUMEN
Objective: Chronic limb threatening ischemia is the final stage of peripheral arterial disease. Current treatment is based on revascularization to preserve the leg. In the older, hospitalized chronic limb threatening ischemia patient, delirium is a frequent and severe complication after revascularization. Delirium leads to an increased length of hospital stay, a higher mortality rate and a decrease in quality of life. Currently, no specific guidelines to prevent delirium in chronic limb threatening ischemia patients exist. We aim to evaluate the effect of a multicomponent, multidisciplinary prehabilitation program on the incidence of delirium in chronic limb threatening ischemia patients ≥65 years. Design: A prospective observational cohort study to investigate the effects of the program on the incidence of delirium will be performed in a large teaching hospital in the Netherlands. This manuscript describes the design of the study and the content of this specific prehabilitation program. Methods: Chronic limb threatening ischemia patients ≥65 years that require revascularization will participate in the program. This program focuses on optimizing the patient's overall health and includes delirium risk assessment, nutritional optimization, home-based physical therapy, iron infusion in case of anaemia and a comprehensive geriatric assessment in case of frailty. The primary outcome is the incidence of delirium. Secondary outcomes include quality of life, amputation-free survival, length of hospital stay and mortality. Exclusion criteria are the requirement of acute treatment or patients who are mentally incompetent to understand the procedures of the study or to complete questionnaires. A historical cohort from the same hospital is used as a control group. Discussion: This study will clarify the effect of a prehabilitation program on delirium incidence in chronic limb threatening ischemia patients. New insights will be obtained on optimizing a patient's preoperative mental and physical condition to prevent postoperative complications, including delirium. Trial: This protocol is registered at the Netherlands National Trial Register (NTR) number: NL9380.
Asunto(s)
Delirio , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica , Anciano , Isquemia Crónica que Amenaza las Extremidades , Delirio/epidemiología , Delirio/prevención & control , Humanos , Isquemia/cirugía , Recuperación del Miembro , Estudios Observacionales como Asunto , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/cirugía , Ejercicio Preoperatorio , Estudios Prospectivos , Calidad de Vida , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Elderly patients undergoing vascular surgery are at a risk of developing postoperative delirium, which is associated with high mortality. Delirium prevention is difficult and is investigated in surgical patients from various specialisms, but little is known about delirium prevention in vascular surgery. For this reason we performed a systematic review on strategies for delirium prevention in patients undergoing elective surgery for peripheral arterial disease or for an aneurysm of the abdominal aorta. METHODS: This systematic review included studies describing strategies for preventing delirium in patients undergoing elective surgery for peripheral arterial disease or for an aneurysm of the abdominal aorta. The search was conducted using the keywords 'vascular surgery,' 'prevention,' and 'delirium' and was last run on October 21, 2021 in the electronic databases PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, the Cochrane library, and Emcare. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias tool for randomized controlled trials and the ROBINS-1 tool for observational studies. RESULTS: Four studies including 565 patients were included in the systematic review. A significant decrease in the incidence of delirium was reported by a study investigating the effect of comprehensive geriatric assessments within patients undergoing surgery for an aneurysm of the abdominal aorta or lower limb bypass surgery (24% in the control group vs. 11% in the intervention group, P = 0.018) and in the total group of a study evaluating the effect of outpatient clinic multimodal prehabilitation for patients with an aneurysm of the abdominal aorta (11.7% in the control group vs. 8.2% in the intervention group, P = 0.043, Odds Ratio = 0.56). A nonsignificant decrease in delirium incidence was described for patients receiving a multidisciplinary quality improvement at the vascular surgical ward (21.4% in the control group vs. 14.6% in the intervention group, P = 0.17). The study concerning the impact of the type of anesthesia on delirium in 11 older vascular surgical patients, of which 3 developed delirium, did not differentiate between the different types of anesthesia the patients received. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the high and continuous increasing incidence of delirium in the growing elderly vascular population, little is known about effective preventive strategies. An approach to address multiple risk factors simultaneously seems to be promising in delirium prevention, whether through multimodal prehabilitation or comprehensive geriatric assessments. Several strategies including prehabilitation programs have been proven to be successful in other types of surgery and more research is required to evaluate effective preventive strategies and prehabilitation programs in vascular surgical patients.
Asunto(s)
Delirio , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica , Anciano , Delirio/diagnóstico , Delirio/etiología , Delirio/prevención & control , Humanos , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/complicaciones , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/prevención & control , Resultado del Tratamiento , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Vasculares/efectos adversosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) has a high mortality and amputation risk even after revascularization. Owing to an aging population the incidence of peripheral arterial disease is rising. However, the current age distribution in patients with CLTI and the impact of age on outcomes remains unclear. For this reason we performed an age-dependent analysis of mortality, morbidity, and amputation-free survival after open surgical revascularization (OSR) and endovascular revascularization therapy (ERT) with identification of risk factors for mortality. Standardized mortality ratios (SMR) were calculated, comparing observed deaths in the study population to expected deaths based on age and gender specific mortality rates of the overall Dutch population. METHODS: Patients revascularized for the first episode of CLTI between 2013 and 2018 were included in this multicenter retrospective cohort study. The cohort was divided into 2 treatment groups (OSR and ERT) who were each stratified in 3 age groups: early age group < 65 years (G1), middle age group 65-74 years (G2), and elderly age group ≥ 75 years (G3). RESULTS: During the study period 274 limbs (43.9%) were treated with OSR and 350 limbs (56.1%) with ERT. The young population (G1) is only a small part of the whole CLTI population, namely for OSR 22% and ERT 18%. The risk profile of the early age group was characterized by male gender and smoking, whereas the elderly age group was characterized by poor arterial runoff, tissue loss, hypertension, hypercholesterolemia, chronic kidney disease, history of heart disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and cerebrovascular disease. One year amputation rates were similar between the age groups. However, significantly higher one-year mortality rates were observed in patients ≥ 75 years in comparison to the low mortality rates in patients < 75 years (OSR: G3 19.8% vs. G2 7.1% and G1 6.7%, P = 0.006; ERT: G3 30.7% vs. G2 12.7% and G1 7.8%, P = 0.001). The SMR in this elderly group equaled 3.72 after OSR and 4.04 after ERT. Independent risk factors for mortality after OSR were age, hazard ratio (HR) 1.03 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.01-1.06; P = 0.006), preoperative hemoglobin level (HR 0.79; 95% CI 0.67-0.92; P = 0.003), tissue loss (HR 1.85; 95% CI 1.22-2.79; P = 0.004), cardiac history (HR 1.56; 95% CI 1.06-2.30; P = 0.024), and development of postoperative delirium (HR 2.75; 95% CI 1.61-4.71; P < 0.001). After ERT we identified age, HR 1.06 (95% CI 1.04-1.08; P < 0.001); preoperative hemoglobin level, HR 0.75 (95% CI 0.65-0.87; P < 0.001); tissue loss, HR 1.71 (95% CI 1.15-2.53; P = 0.008); history of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, HR 1.99 (95% CI 1.43-1.79; P < 0.001); history of cerebrovascular accident (CVA), HR 1.55 (95% CI 1.09-2.21; P = 0.015); the development of postoperative pneumonia, HR 2.27 (95% CI 1.24-4.16; P = 0.008); postoperative acute kidney injury (AKI), HR 2.42 (95% CI 1.29-4.54; P = 0.006); and postoperative CVA, HR 8.17 (95% CI 1.96-34.15; P = 0.004) as risk factors. CONCLUSIONS: The current CLTI population consists mostly of elderly patients and only a small part is younger than 65 years. This shift in the population is important because increasing age is associated with considerable higher one-year mortality rates regardless of the method of revascularization in patients with CLTI. The mortality rates in the elderly group are 3 to 4 times larger than expected in the general population. In relation to the high mortality of the elderly patient, we assume that interventions to prevent postoperative delirium and correct preoperative anemia may be warranted as they appear to be independent risk factors for mortality.
Asunto(s)
Delirio , Procedimientos Endovasculares , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica , Anciano , Enfermedad Crónica , Isquemia Crónica que Amenaza las Extremidades , Procedimientos Endovasculares/efectos adversos , Hemoglobinas , Humanos , Isquemia/diagnóstico por imagen , Isquemia/cirugía , Recuperación del Miembro , Extremidad Inferior/irrigación sanguínea , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/diagnóstico por imagen , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/cirugía , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: The goal of this study was to assess the long-term effectiveness of combination therapy for intermittent claudication, compared with supervised exercise only. BACKGROUND: Supervised exercise therapy is recommended as first-line treatment for intermittent claudication by recent guidelines. Combining endovascular revascularization plus supervised exercise shows promising results; however, there is a lack of long-term follow-up. METHODS: The ERASE study is a multicenter randomized clinical trial, including patients between May 2010 and February 2013 with intermittent claudication. Interventions were combination of endovascular revascularization plus supervised exercise (n = 106) or supervised exercise only (n = 106). Primary endpoint was the difference in maximum walking distance at long-term follow-up. Secondary endpoints included differences in pain-free walking distance, ankle-brachial index, quality of life, progression to critical limb ischemia, and revascularization procedures during follow-up. This randomized trial report is based on a post hoc analysis of extended follow-up beyond that of the initial trial. Patients were followed up until 31 July 2017. Data were analyzed according to the intention-to-treat principle. RESULTS: Median long-term follow-up was 5.4 years (IQR 4.9-5.7). Treadmill test was completed for 128/212 (60%) patients. Whereas the difference in maximum walking distance significantly favored combination therapy at 1-year follow-up, the difference at 5-year follow-up was no longer significant (53 m; 99% CI-225 to 331; P = 0.62). No difference in pain-free walking distance, ankle-brachial index, and quality of life was found during long-term follow-up. We found that supervised exercise was associated with an increased hazard of a revascularization procedure during follow-up (HR 2.50; 99% CI 1.27-4.90; P < 0.001). The total number of revascularization procedures (including randomized treatment) was lower in the exercise only group compared to that in the combination therapy group (65 vs 149). CONCLUSIONS: Long-term follow up after combination therapy versus supervised exercise only, demonstrated no significant difference in walking distance or quality of life between the treatment groups. Combination therapy resulted in a lower number of revascularization procedures during follow-up but a higher total number of revascularizations including the randomized treatment. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Netherlands Trial Registry Identifier: NTR2249.
Asunto(s)
Claudicación Intermitente , Calidad de Vida , Humanos , Claudicación Intermitente/cirugía , Estudios de Seguimiento , Caminata , Terapia por Ejercicio/métodos , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To assess whether level of arterial obstruction determines the effectiveness of SET in patients with IC. BACKGROUND DATA: Guidelines advocate SET before invasive treatment for IC, but early revascularization remains widespread, especially in patients with aortoiliac disease. METHODS: Patients were recruited from 10 Dutch centers between October 2017 and October 2018. Participants received SET first, followed by endovascular or open revascularization in case of insufficient effect. They were grouped according to level of stenosis (aortoiliac, femoropopliteal, multilevel, or rest group with no significant stenosis). Changes from baseline walking performance (maximal and functional walking distance on a treadmill test, 6-minute walk test) and vascular quality of life questionnaire-6 at 3 and 6 months were compared, after multivariate adjustment for possible confounders. Freedom from revascularization was estimated with Kaplan-Meier analysis. RESULTS: Some 267 patients were eligible for analysis (aortoiliac n = 70, 26%; femoropopliteal n = 115, 43%; multilevel n = 69, 26%; rest n = 13, 5%). No between group differences in walking performance or vascular quality of life questionnaire-6 were found. Mean improvement in maximal walking distance after 6 months was 439 m [99% confidence interval (CI) 297-581], 466 m (99% CI 359-574), 353 m (99% CI 210-496), and 403 m (99% CI 58-749), respectively (P = 0.40). Freedom from intervention was 73.9% for aortoiliac disease and 88.6% for femoropopliteal disease (hazard ratio 2.46, 99% CI 0.96 - 6.30, P = 0.013). CONCLUSIONS: Short-term effectiveness of SET for IC is not determined by the location of stenosis. Although aortoiliac disease patients improved walking performance and health-related quality of life similarly compared to other arterial disease level groups, they underwent revascularization more often.
Asunto(s)
Terapia por Ejercicio/métodos , Claudicación Intermitente/etiología , Claudicación Intermitente/terapia , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/complicaciones , Anciano , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/diagnóstico , Estudios Prospectivos , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
[Figure: see text].
Asunto(s)
Terapia por Ejercicio , Claudicación Intermitente , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Humanos , Claudicación Intermitente/diagnóstico , Claudicación Intermitente/terapia , Calidad de Vida , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: To determine the impact of the first lockdown in the Netherlands' measures during the COVID-19 pandemic on the number and type of trauma-related injuries presenting to the emergency department (ED). DESIGN: A single-centre retrospective cohort study. SETTING: A level 2 trauma centre in Breda, The Netherlands. PARTICIPANTS: All patients with trauma seen at the ED between 11 March and 10 May 2020 (the first Dutch lockdown period) were included in this study. Comparable groups were generated for 2019 and 2018. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary outcomes were the total number of patients with trauma admitted to the ED and the trauma mechanism. Secondary outcomes were triage categories, time of ED visit, trauma severity (Injury Severity Score (ISS) >12), anatomical region of injury and treatment. RESULTS: A total of 4674 patients were included in this study. During the first months of the COVID-19 pandemic, there was a decrease of 32% in traumatic injuries at the ED (n=1182) compared with the previous years 2019 (n=1717) and 2018 (n=1775) (p<0.001). Sports-related injuries decreased most during the lockdown (n=164) compared with 2019 (n=386) and 2018 (n=367) (p<0.001). We observed more frequent injuries due to a fall from standing height (p<0.001) and work-related injuries (p<0.05). The mean age was significantly higher (mean 48 years vs 42 and 43 years). There was no difference in anatomical place of injury or ISS >12. The amount of patients admitted for emergency surgery was significantly higher (14.6% vs 9.4%; 8.6%, p<0.001). Seven patients (0.6%) tested positive for COVID-19. CONCLUSIONS: Measures taken in the COVID-19 outbreak result in a predictable decrease in the total number of patients with trauma, especially sports-related trauma. Although the trauma burden on the emergency room appears to be lower, more people have been admitted for trauma surgery, possibly due to increased throughput in the operating theatres.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19/psicología , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Pandemias , Conducta Autodestructiva/epidemiología , Aislamiento Social , Centros Traumatológicos/estadística & datos numéricos , Heridas y Lesiones/epidemiología , Adolescente , Adulto , Niño , Control de Enfermedades Transmisibles , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Femenino , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Países Bajos/epidemiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , SARS-CoV-2RESUMEN
Objectives: This study aimed to demonstrate the impact of elective major abdominal surgery and subsequent postoperative delirium on quality of life (QOL; primary outcome), cognitive functioning and depressive symptoms (secondary outcomes) in older surgical patients.Method: A single-centre, longitudinal prospective cohort study was conducted between November 2015 and June 2018, including patients ≥70 years old who underwent surgery for colorectal cancer or an abdominal aortic aneurysm. They were followed-up at discharge and at 6 and 12 months postoperatively until June 2019. QOL was assessed with the World Health Organization Quality of Life-BREF questionnaire (WHOQOL-BREF). Cognitive functioning was measured with the Mini-Mental State Examination and depressive symptoms with the CES-D 16.Results: In all patients (n = 265), physical and psychological health were significantly lower at discharge compared to baseline (p < 0.001 for both domains). Physical health restored after 6 months, but psychological health remained decreased for the complete study period. Psychological, social and environmental QOL were significantly worse in patients with delirium compared to patients without (p = 0.001, p = 0.006 and p = 0.001 respectively). The cognitive functioning score was significantly lower at baseline in patients with delirium compared to those without (p = 0.006). Patients with delirium had a significantly higher CES-D 16 score compared to those without after 12 months (p = 0.027).Conclusion: Physical and psychological QOL were decreased in the early postoperative period. While physical health was restored after 6 and 12 months, psychological health remained decreased. After 12 months, postoperative delirium resulted in worse psychological, social and environmental QOL and more depressive symptoms. Decreased cognitive functioning may be a risk factor for delirium.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Colorrectales , Delirio , Anciano , Cognición , Neoplasias Colorrectales/cirugía , Delirio/epidemiología , Depresión/epidemiología , Humanos , Estudios Prospectivos , Calidad de Vida , Factores de RiesgoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Older patients often have iron deficiency anemia before surgery, which can be effectively treated with intravenous iron supplementation (IVIS). Anemia and blood transfusions are associated with an increased risk of delirium. The aim of this research was to assess the effectiveness and safety of using IVIS in a prehabilitation program. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Patients ≥70 y who underwent abdominal surgery between November 2015 and June 2018 were included in this single-center prospective cohort study. All patients were prehabilitated; however, only anemic patients received a single dose of 1000 mg intravenous iron (ferric carboxymaltose) to increase preoperative hemoglobin levels (IVIS group). Nonanemic patients received standard care (SC). The hemoglobin levels (primary outcome) were assessed at the outpatient clinic visit, at admission, and at discharge. Secondary outcomes were postoperative delirium, postoperative anemia, blood transfusion, complications other than delirium, and length of hospital stay. All outcomes were compared between the IVIS group and SC group. RESULTS: Of all patients (n = 248), 97 anemic patients received IVIS (39%). Of the anemic patients, 50 patients (52%) had iron deficiency. Initial differences in hemoglobin concentrations between the IVIS group and SC group at T1 and T2 (7.2 versus 8.8; P < 0.001 and 7.4 versus 8.6; P = 0.023, respectively) were no longer present at discharge (6.6 versus 7.2; P = 0.35). No statistically significant differences were observed for all secondary outcomes between the IVIS group and the SC group. No infusion-related adverse events occurred. CONCLUSIONS: Adding IVIS to prehabilitation programs is safe and diminishes differences in these concentrations between preoperatively anemic and nonanemic patients. IVIS may be worthwhile as an additional component of prehabilitation programs. Results merit further investigation.
Asunto(s)
Hierro/administración & dosificación , Cuidados Preoperatorios/métodos , Abdomen/cirugía , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Anemia/epidemiología , Anemia Ferropénica/tratamiento farmacológico , Anemia Ferropénica/epidemiología , Transfusión Sanguínea/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios de Cohortes , Delirio/epidemiología , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Electivos , Femenino , Hemoglobinas/análisis , Humanos , Infusiones Intravenosas , Masculino , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/prevención & control , Estudios ProspectivosRESUMEN
PURPOSE: In elderly patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI), there is little scientific understanding of the long-term changes of quality of life (QoL) and health status (HS) after treatment. The primary goal of this study was to provide long-term QoL and HS results for elderly CLTI patients after therapy. Treatments consisted of endovascular revascularization, surgical revascularization, or conservative treatment. Furthermore, the aim of this study was to identify the distinctive trajectories of QoL and HS. PATIENTS AND METHODS: CLTI patients aged ≥70 years were included in a prospective observational cohort study with a two-year follow-up. The WHOQOL-BREF was used to asses QoL. The 12-Item Short Form Health Survey was used to measure HS. The QoL and HS scores were compared to the scores in the general elderly Dutch population. Latent class trajectory analysis was used. RESULTS: A total of 195 patients were included in this study. After two years, in all treatment groups patients showed significantly higher physical QoL score compared to baseline and there was no significant difference with the corresponding values in the elderly Dutch population. In the latent class trajectory analysis, there were no overlapping risk factors for poorer QoL or HS. CONCLUSION: This study shows that QoL levels in surviving elderly CLTI patients in the long-term do not differ from the corresponding values for elderly in the general population. There were no disparities in sociodemographic, clinical and treatment characteristics associated with poorer QoL and HS. This study was carried out to encourage further analysis of the influence of biopsychosocial characteristics on QoL and HS in elderly CLTI patients.
Asunto(s)
Estado de Salud , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/cirugía , Calidad de Vida , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Vasculares/estadística & datos numéricos , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Enfermedad Crónica , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Países Bajos , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/psicología , Estudios Prospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Factores Socioeconómicos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Vasculares/psicologíaRESUMEN
Leriche syndrome was diagnosed in three patients aged 63, 71 and 73. They presented with a wide range of neurological symptoms such as impotence, pain or dysfunction of the lower extremities. Because a neurological diagnosis was initially suspected, there was a delay in two of the three patients before palpation for a distal pulse in the lower extremities was performed. A pulse was absent in all three patients. Duplex sonography, MR angiography and CT angiography revealed that a pulse was absent due to aortoiliac occlusive disease, also known as Leriche syndrome. They underwent treatment with covered endovascular reconstruction of the aortic bifurcation (CERAB), aortobifemoral bypass or intravenous thrombolysis. All patients significantly improved after treatment. Physicians should always consider aortoiliac occlusive disease in patients who present with neurological symptoms of the lower extremities and must check for a distal pulse in these patients.
Asunto(s)
Aorta Abdominal/fisiopatología , Arteria Ilíaca/fisiopatología , Síndrome de Leriche/diagnóstico , Extremidad Inferior/fisiopatología , Anciano , Angiografía , Aorta Abdominal/cirugía , Enfermedades de la Aorta/diagnóstico , Enfermedades de la Aorta/fisiopatología , Enfermedades de la Aorta/cirugía , Arteriopatías Oclusivas/diagnóstico , Arteriopatías Oclusivas/fisiopatología , Arteriopatías Oclusivas/cirugía , Angiografía por Tomografía Computarizada , Disfunción Eréctil/diagnóstico , Disfunción Eréctil/etiología , Femenino , Humanos , Arteria Ilíaca/cirugía , Síndrome de Leriche/fisiopatología , Síndrome de Leriche/cirugía , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Dolor/diagnóstico , Dolor/etiología , Pulso Arterial , Stents , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The aim of this study is to investigate the impact of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) lockdown period on the number and type of vascular procedures performed in the operating theater. METHODS: A total of 38 patients who underwent 46 vascular procedures during the lockdown period of March 16th until April 30th, 2020, were included. The control groups consisted of 29 patients in 2019 and 54 patients in 2018 who underwent 36 and 66 vascular procedures, respectively, in the same time period. Data were analyzed using SPSS Statistics. RESULTS: Our study shows that the lockdown during the COVID-19 pandemic resulted in a significant increase in the number of major amputations (42% in 2020 vs. 18% and 15% in 2019 and 2020, respectively; P-value 0.019). Furthermore, we observed a statistically significant difference in the degree of tissue loss as categorized by the Rutherford classification (P-value 0.007). During the lockdown period, patients presented with more extensive ischemic damage when than previous years. We observed no difference in vascular surgical care for patients with an aortic aneurysm. CONCLUSIONS: Measurements taken during the lockdown period have a significant effect on non-COVID-19 vascular patient care, which leads to an increased severe morbidity. In the future, policy makers should be aware of the impact of their measurements on vulnerable patient groups such as those with peripheral arterial occlusive disease. For these patients, medical care should be easily accessible and adequate.
Asunto(s)
Amputación Quirúrgica/estadística & datos numéricos , Aneurisma de la Aorta/cirugía , Infecciones por Coronavirus/epidemiología , Enfermedades Vasculares Periféricas/cirugía , Neumonía Viral/epidemiología , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/estadística & datos numéricos , Control Social Formal , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Vasculares/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Betacoronavirus , COVID-19 , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Países Bajos/epidemiología , Pandemias , Cuarentena , SARS-CoV-2 , Aislamiento SocialRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Intermittent claudication (IC) and chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) are both associated with a decreased health status and possibly quality of life (QOL). A better understanding of the differences in QOL between patients with IC and CLTI could be of additional value in shared decision-making. The aim of this study was to compare the QOL at baseline between patients with IC and patients with CLTI. METHODS: The study population was based on 2 study cohorts, 1 cohort consisted of patients with IC (ELECT registry) and the other cohort of patients with CLTI (KOP-study). Patients with an age of ≥70 years were included. QOL at baseline was measured by the WHOQOL-BREF questionnaire. Nonresponders were excluded from data analyses. Student's t-tests and analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) analyses were used to compare QOL between the 2 groups. Outcomes of the ANCOVA analyses were expressed as estimated marginal means. RESULTS: In total, 308 patients were included, 115 patients with IC and 193 patients with CLTI. Patients with CLTI were older (median age 80 years vs. 75 years, P < 0.001) and had more comorbidities. Patients with IC had a statistically significant higher QOL regarding physical health (mean 13.7 [standard deviation (SD) 2.3] vs. 10.8 [SD 2.8], P < 0.001), psychological health (mean 15.3 [SD 2.1] vs. 14.1 [SD 2.4], P < 0.001), environment (mean 16.3 [SD 2.4] vs. 15.5 [SD 2.0], P < 0.002), and the overall domain (mean 3.5 [SD 0.7] vs. 3.1 [SD 0.9], P < 0.001). After correcting for the confounding effect of age and sex, patients with IC still had a statistically significant higher QOL in the physical, psychological, environment, and overall domain. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with IC had a significantly higher QOL in the physical, psychological, environment, and overall domains of the WHOQOL-BREF questionnaire compared with patients with CLTI. This underlines the importance of strategies that reduce disease progression as disease progression is associated with a decrease in QOL.
Asunto(s)
Claudicación Intermitente/diagnóstico , Isquemia/diagnóstico , Medición de Resultados Informados por el Paciente , Calidad de Vida , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Enfermedad Crónica , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Femenino , Humanos , Claudicación Intermitente/fisiopatología , Claudicación Intermitente/psicología , Claudicación Intermitente/terapia , Isquemia/fisiopatología , Isquemia/psicología , Isquemia/terapia , Masculino , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Sistema de RegistrosRESUMEN
PURPOSE: The long-term outcomes of surgery followed by delirium after multimodal prehabilitation program are largely unknown. We conducted this study to assess the effects of prehabilitation on 1-year mortality and of postoperative delirium on 1-year mortality and functional outcomes. METHODS: The subjects of this study were patients aged ≥ 70 years who underwent elective surgery for abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) or colorectal cancer (CRC) between January 2013, and June 2018. A prehabilitation program was implemented in November 2015, which aimed to optimize physical health, nutritional status, factors of frailty and preoperative anemia prior to surgery. The outcomes were assessed as mortality after 6 and 12 months, compared between the two treatment groups; and mortality and functional outcomes, compared between patients with and those without delirium. RESULTS: There were 627 patients (controls N = 360, prehabilitation N = 267) included in this study. Prehabilitation did not reduce mortality after 1 year (HR 1.31 [95% CI 0.75-2.30]; p = 0.34). Delirium was significantly associated with 1-year mortality (HR 4.36 [95% CI 2.45-7.75]; p < 0.001) and with worse functional outcomes after 6 and 12 months (KATZ ADL p = 0.013 and p = 0.004; TUG test p = 0.041 and p = 0.011, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The prehabilitation program did not reduce 1-year mortality. Delirium and the burden of comorbidity are both independently associated with an increased risk of 1-year mortality and delirium is associated with worse functional outcomes. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Dutch Trial Registration, NTR5932. https://www.trialregister.nl/trialreg/admin/rctview.asp?TC=5932 .