Biased Signaling Agonists Promote Distinct Phosphorylation and Conformational States of the Dopamine D3 Receptor.

Biased agonists of G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) have emerged as promising selective modulators of signaling pathways by offering therapeutic advantages over unbiased agonists to minimize side effects. The dopamine D3 receptor (D3R), a pivotal GPCR in the central nervous system, has gained significant attention as a therapeutic target for neurological diseases, including Parkinson's disease (PD), addiction, psychosis, depression, and anxiety. We have recently designed and tested SK609, a G-protein biased D3R selective agonist, and demonstrated its efficacy in reducing motor impairment and improving cognitive effects in a rodent model of PD. The molecular mechanism by which SK609 recruits G-protein but not ß-arrestin pathways is poorly understood. Utilizing all-atom molecular dynamics simulations, we investigated the distinct conformational dynamics imparted by SK609 and the reference unbiased agonist Pramipexole (PRX). Results from these studies show that the flexibility of transmembrane 3 is key to unbiased signaling, with a ~30° and ~17° shift in tilt angle in the D3R-Gi and D3R-ßarrestin2 complexes, respectively. Additionally, untargeted phosphoproteomics analysis reveals unique phosphorylation sites by SK609 and PRX in D3R. These results suggest that SK609 induces conformational changes and unique phosphorylation patterns that promote interactions with G-proteins and are not conducive for ß-arrestin2 recruitment and signaling.

GPCR Inhibitors Have Antiviral Properties against JC Polyomavirus Infection.

JC polyomavirus (JCPyV) infects the majority of the population and initially establishes a persistent but asymptomatic infection of the kidneys. In healthy individuals, the infection remains controlled by the host immune system, but for individuals experiencing prolonged immunosuppression, the infection can reactivate and spread to the brain, where it causes progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML), which is a fatal neurodegenerative disease. Currently, there are no approved therapies to treat PML, and affected individuals suffer rapid motor weakness and cognitive deterioration. To identify novel therapeutic treatments for JCPyV infection, receptor agonists/antagonists identified in a previously published drug screen were evaluated for their antiviral properties. Seven drugs were selected and validated using infectivity assays, and the mechanism of inhibition was further explored for G protein coupled receptor (GPCR)-associated inhibitors due to the role of the GPCR 5-hydroxytryptamine 2 receptors (5-HT2Rs) in JCPyV entry. The inhibitors cetirizine and paroxetine both reduced infection early in the JCPyV infectious cycle. Paroxetine specifically reduced viral internalization through altering the receptor density of 5-HT2CR, inhibiting ß-arrestin recruitment to the receptor, and reducing MAPK signaling through ERK. These findings highlight the potential of receptor signaling and viral entry mechanisms as possible targets for antiviral drug development. Further, this research suggests that FDA-approved receptor agonists/antagonists currently used to treat other medical conditions could be repurposed into antivirals for the possible treatment of JCPyV infection and the fatal disease PML.

Regulation of ß-Adrenergic Receptors in the Heart: A Review on Emerging Therapeutic Strategies for Heart Failure.

The prolonged overstimulation of ß-adrenergic receptors (ß-ARs), a member of the G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) family, causes abnormalities in the density and functionality of the receptor and contributes to cardiac dysfunctions, leading to the development and progression of heart diseases, especially heart failure (HF). Despite recent advancements in HF therapy, mortality and morbidity rates continue to be high. Treatment with ß-AR antagonists (ß-blockers) has improved clinical outcomes and reduced overall hospitalization and mortality rates. However, several barriers in the management of HF remain, providing opportunities to develop new strategies that focus on the functions and signal transduction of ß-ARs involved in the pathogenesis of HF. As ß-AR can signal through multiple pathways influenced by different receptor subtypes, expression levels, and signaling components such as G proteins, G protein-coupled receptor kinases (GRKs), ß-arrestins, and downstream effectors, it presents a complex mechanism that could be targeted in HF management. In this narrative review, we focus on the regulation of ß-ARs at the receptor, G protein, and effector loci, as well as their signal transductions in the physiology and pathophysiology of the heart. The discovery of potential ligands for ß-AR that activate cardioprotective pathways while limiting off-target signaling is promising for the treatment of HF. However, applying findings from preclinical animal models to human patients faces several challenges, including species differences, the genetic variability of ß-ARs, and the complexity and heterogeneity of humans. In this review, we also summarize recent updates and future research on the regulation of ß-ARs in the molecular basis of HF and highlight potential therapeutic strategies for HF.

Hormonal and Allosteric Regulation of the Luteinizing Hormone/Chorionic Gonadotropin Receptor.

Luteinizing hormone (LH) and human chorionic gonadotropin (CG), like follicle-stimulating hormone, are the most important regulators of the reproductive system. They exert their effect on the cell through the LH/CG receptor (LHCGR), which belongs to the family of G protein-coupled receptors. Binding to gonadotropin induces the interaction of LHCGR with various types of heterotrimeric G proteins (Gs, Gq/11, Gi) and ß-arrestins, which leads to stimulation (Gs) or inhibition (Gi) of cyclic adenosine monophosphate-dependent cascades, activation of the phospholipase pathway (Gq/11), and also to the formation of signalosomes that mediate the stimulation of mitogen-activated protein kinases (ß-arrestins). The efficiency and selectivity of activation of intracellular cascades by different gonadotropins varies, which is due to differences in their interaction with the ligand-binding site of LHCGR. Gonadotropin signaling largely depends on the status of N- and O-glycosylation of LH and CG, on the formation of homo- and heterodimeric receptor complexes, on the cell-specific microenvironment of LHCGR and the presence of autoantibodies to it, and allosteric mechanisms are important in the implementation of these influences, which is due to the multiplicity of allosteric sites in different loci of the LHCGR. The development of low-molecular-weight allosteric regulators of LHCGR with different profiles of pharmacological activity, which can be used in medicine for the correction of reproductive disorders and in assisted reproductive technologies, is promising. These and other issues regarding the hormonal and allosteric regulation of LHCGR are summarized and discussed in this review.

Implications of ß-Arrestin biased signaling by angiotensin II type 1 receptor for cardiovascular drug discovery and therapeutics.

Angiotensin II receptors, Type 1 (AT1R) and Type 2 (AT2R) are 7TM receptors that play critical roles in both the physiological and pathophysiological regulation of the cardiovascular system. While AT1R blockers (ARBs) have proven beneficial in managing cardiac, vascular and renal maladies they cannot completely halt and reverse the progression of pathologies. Numerous experimental and animal studies have demonstrated that ß-arrestin biased AT1R-ligands (such as SII-AngII, S1I8, TRV023, and TRV027) offer cardiovascular benefits by blocking the G protein signaling while retaining the ß-arrestin signaling. However, these ligands failed to show improvement in heart-failure outcome over the placebo in a phase IIb clinical trial. One major limitation of current ß-arrestin biased AT1R-ligands is that they are peptides with short half-lives, limiting their long-term efficacy in patients. Additionally, ß-arrestin biased AT1R-ligand peptides, may inadvertently block AT2R, a promiscuous receptor, potentially negating its beneficial effects in post-myocardial infarction (MI) patients. Therefore, developing a small molecule ß-arrestin biased AT1R-ligand with a longer half-life and specificity to AT1R could be more effective in treating heart failure. This approach has the potential to revolutionize the treatment of cardiovascular diseases by offering more sustained and targeted therapeutic effects.

Myeloid beta-arrestin 2 depletion attenuates metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis via the metabolic reprogramming of macrophages.

Macrophage-mediated inflammation has been implicated in the pathogenesis of metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (MASH); however, the immunometabolic program underlying the regulation of macrophage activation remains unclear. Beta-arrestin 2, a multifunctional adaptor protein, is highly expressed in bone marrow tissues and macrophages and is involved in metabolism disorders. Here, we observed that ß-arrestin 2 expression was significantly increased in the liver macrophages and circulating monocytes of patients with MASH compared with healthy controls and positively correlated with the severity of metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD). Global or myeloid Arrb2 deficiency prevented the development of MASH in mice. Further study showed that ß-arrestin 2 acted as an adaptor protein and promoted ubiquitination of immune responsive gene 1 (IRG1) to prevent increased itaconate production in macrophages, which resulted in enhanced succinate dehydrogenase activity, thereby promoting the release of mitochondrial reactive oxygen species and M1 polarization. Myeloid ß-arrestin 2 depletion may be a potential approach for MASH.

Control of G protein-coupled receptor function via membrane-interacting intrinsically disordered C-terminal domains.

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) control intracellular signaling cascades via agonist-dependent coupling to intracellular transducers including heterotrimeric G proteins, GPCR kinases (GRKs), and arrestins. In addition to their critical interactions with the transmembrane core of active GPCRs, all three classes of transducers have also been reported to interact with receptor C-terminal domains (CTDs). An underexplored aspect of GPCR CTDs is their possible role as lipid sensors given their proximity to the membrane. CTD-membrane interactions have the potential to control the accessibility of key regulatory CTD residues to downstream effectors and transducers. Here, we report that the CTDs of two closely related family C GPCRs, metabotropic glutamate receptor 2 (mGluR2) and mGluR3, bind to membranes and that this interaction can regulate receptor function. We first characterize CTD structure with NMR spectroscopy, revealing lipid composition-dependent modes of membrane binding. Using molecular dynamics simulations and structure-guided mutagenesis, we then identify key conserved residues and cancer-associated mutations that modulate CTD-membrane binding. Finally, we provide evidence that mGluR3 transducer coupling is controlled by CTD-membrane interactions in live cells, which may be subject to regulation by CTD phosphorylation and changes in membrane composition. This work reveals an additional mechanism of GPCR modulation, suggesting that CTD-membrane binding may be a general regulatory mode throughout the broad GPCR superfamily.

GPR116 alleviates acetaminophen-induced liver injury in mice by inhibiting endoplasmic reticulum stress.

BACKGROUND: Acetaminophen (APAP) overdose is a significant contributor to drug-induced liver injury worldwide. G-protein-coupled receptor 116 (GPR116) is an important homeostatic maintenance molecule in the body, but little is known about its role in APAP-induced liver injury (AILI). METHODS: GPR116 expression was determined in both human and mouse AILI models. Hepatic function and damage response were analyzed in hepatocyte-specific GPR116 deletion (GPR116△HC) mice undergoing APAP challenge. RNA-sequencing, immunofluorescence confocal, and co-immunoprecipitation (CO-IP) were employed to elucidate the impact and underlying mechanisms of GPR116 in AILI. RESULTS: Intrahepatic GPR116 was upregulated in human and mice with AILI. GPR116△HC mice were vulnerable to AILI compared to wild-type mice. Overexpression of GPR116 effectively mitigated AILI in wild-type mice and counteracted the heightened susceptibility of GPR116△HC mice to APAP. Mechanistically, GPR116 inhibits the binding immunoglobulin protein (BiP), a critical regulator of ER function, through its interaction with ß-arrestin1, thereby mitigating ER stress during the early stage of AILI. Additionally, the activation of GPR116 by ligand FNDC4 has been shown to confer a protective effect against early hepatotoxicity caused by APAP in murine model. CONCLUSIONS: Upregulation of GPR116 on hepatocytes inhibits ER stress by binding to ß-arrestin1, protecting mice from APAP-induced hepatotoxicity. GPR116 may serve as a promising therapeutic target for AILI.

Ca2+-sensing receptor-TRP channel-mediated Ca2+ signaling: Functional diversity and pharmacological complexity.

The Ca2+-sensing receptor (CaSR) is a G-protein-coupled receptor activated by elevated concentrations of extracellular Ca2+, and was initially known for its regulation of parathyroid hormone (PTH) release. Ubiquitous expression of CaSR in different tissues and organs was later noted and CaSR participation in various physiological functions was demonstrated. Accumulating evidence has suggested that CaSR functionally interacts with transient receptor potential (TRP) channels, which are mostly non-selective cation channels involved in sensing temperature, pain and stress. This review describes the interactions of CaSR with TRP channels in diverse cell types to trigger a variety of biological responses. CaSR has been known to interact with different types of G proteins. Possible involvements of G proteins, other signaling and scaffolding protein intermediates in CaSR-TRP interaction are discussed. In addition, an attempt will be made to extend the current understanding of biased agonism of CaSR.

Xelaglifam, a novel GPR40/FFAR1 agonist, exhibits enhanced ß-arrestin recruitment and sustained glycemic control for type 2 diabetes.

Xelaglifam, developed as a GPR40/FFAR1 agonist, induces glucose-dependent insulin secretion and reduces circulating glucose levels for Type 2 diabetes treatment. This study investigated the effects of Xelaglifam in comparison with Fasiglifam on the in vitro/in vivo anti-diabetic efficacy and selectivity, and the mechanistic basis. In vitro studies on downstream targets of Xelaglifam were performed in GPR40-expressing cells. Xelaglifam treatment exhibited dose-dependent effects, increasing inositol phosphate-1, Ca2+ mobilization, and ß-arrestin recruitment (EC50: 0.76 nM, 20 nM, 68 nM), supporting its role in Gq protein-dependent and G-protein-independent mechanisms. Despite a lack of change in the cAMP pathway, the Xelaglifam-treated group demonstrated increased insulin secretion compared to Fasiglifam in HIT-T15 ß cells under high glucose conditions. High doses of Xelaglifam (<30 mg/kg) did not induce hypoglycemia in Sprague-Dawley rats. In addition, Xelaglifam lowered glucose and increased insulin levels in diabetic rat models (GK, ZDF, OLETF). In GK rats, 1 mg/kg of Xelaglifam improved glucose tolerance (33.4 % and 15.6 % for the 1 and 5 h) after consecutive glucose challenges. Moreover, repeated dosing in ZDF and OLETF rats resulted in superior glucose tolerance (34 % and 35.1 % in ZDF and OLETF), reducing fasting hyperglycemia (18.3 % and 30 % in ZDF and OLETF) at lower doses; Xelaglifam demonstrated a longer-lasting effect with a greater effect on ß-cells including 3.8-fold enhanced insulin secretion. Co-treatment of Xelaglifam with SGLT-2 inhibitors showed additive or synergistic effects. Collectively, these results demonstrate the therapeutic efficacy and selectivity of Xelaglifam on GPR40, supportive of its potential for the treatment of Type 2 diabetes.

ARRB1 inhibits extracellular matrix degradation and apoptosis of nucleus pulposus cells by promoting autophagy and attenuates intervertebral disc degeneration.

OBJECTIVE: Intervertebral disc degeneration (IVDD) is the leading cause of lower back pain (LBP). ß-arrestin 1 (ARRB1) is a multifunctional protein that regulates numerous pathological processes. The aim of this study was to investigate the role of ARRB1 in IVDD. METHODS: The expression of ARRB1 in nucleus pulposus (NP) of rats with IVDD was assayed. Next, rat nucleus pulposus cells (NPCs) were infected with lentiviruses containing shArrb1 (LV-shArrb1) and overexpressing Arrb1 (LV-oeArrb1). The roles of Arrb1 in serum-deprived NPCs were investigated by measuring apoptosis, extracellular matrix degradation, and autophagic flux. For experiments in vivo, LV-oeArrb1 lentivirus was injected into the NP tissues of IVDD rats to evaluate the effects of Arrb1 overexpression on NP. RESULTS: In the NP tissues of IVDD rats, ARRB1 and cleaved caspase-3 expression increased, and the ratio of LC3II/LC3I protein expression was upregulated. Arrb1 knockdown aggravated extracellular matrix degradation, cellular apoptosis, and impairment of autophagic flux in rat NPCs under serum-deprived conditions, whereas Arrb1 overexpression significantly reversed these effects. ARRB1 interacted with Beclin 1, and Arrb1 knockdown suppressed the formation of the Beclin1-PIK3C3 core complex. The autophagy inhibitor 3-methyladenine (3-MA) offset the protective effects of Arrb1 overexpression in serum-deprived NPCs. Furthermore, Arrb1 overexpression inhibited apoptosis and extracellular matrix degradation, promoted autophagy in NP, and delayed the development of IVDD in rats. CONCLUSION: ARRB1 prevents extracellular matrix degradation and apoptosis of NPCs by upregulating autophagy and ameliorating IVDD progression, presenting an innovative strategy for the treatment of IVDD.

Investigation of Strategies to Block Downstream Effectors of AT1R-Mediated Signalling to Prevent Aneurysm Formation in Marfan Syndrome.

Cardiovascular outcome in Marfan syndrome (MFS) patients most prominently depends on aortic aneurysm progression with subsequent aortic dissection. Angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs) prevent aneurysm formation in MFS mouse models. In patients, ARBs only slow down aortic dilation. Downstream signalling from the angiotensin II type 1 receptor (AT1R) is mediated by G proteins and ß-arrestin recruitment. AT1R also interacts with the monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1) receptor, resulting in inflammation. In this study, we explore the targeting of ß-arrestin signalling in MFS mice by administering TRV027. Furthermore, because high doses of the ARB losartan, which has been proven beneficial in MFS, cannot be achieved in humans, we investigate a potential additive effect by combining lower concentrations of losartan (25 mg/kg/day and 5 mg/kg/day) with barbadin, a ß-arrestin blocker, and DMX20, a C-C chemokine receptor type 2 (CCR2) blocker. A high dose of losartan (50 mg/kg/day) slowed down aneurysm progression compared to untreated MFS mice (1.73 ± 0.12 vs. 1.96 ± 0.08 mm, p = 0.0033). TRV027, the combination of barbadin with losartan (25 mg/kg/day), and DMX-200 (90 mg/kg/day) with a low dose of losartan (5 mg/kg/day) did not show a significant beneficial effect. Our results confirm that while losartan effectively halts aneurysm formation in Fbn1C1041G/+ MFS mice, neither TRV027 alone nor any of the other compounds combined with lower doses of losartan demonstrate a notable impact on aneurysm advancement. It appears that complete blockade of AT1R function, achieved by administrating a high dosage of losartan, may be necessary for inhibiting aneurysm progression in MFS.

Local anesthetics inhibit muscarinic acetylcholine receptor-mediated calcium responses and the recruitment of ß-arrestin in HSY human parotid cells.

OBJECTIVES: Local anesthetics act on G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs); thus, their potential as allosteric modulators of GPCRs has attracted attention. Intracellular signaling via GPCRs involves both G-protein- and ß-arrestin-mediated pathways. To determine the effects of local anesthetics on muscarinic acetylcholine receptors (mAChR), a family of GPCRs, we analyzed the effects of local anesthetics on mAChR-mediated Ca2+ responses and formation of receptor-ß-arrestin complexes in the HSY human parotid cell line. METHODS: Ca2+ responses were monitored by fura-2 spectrofluorimetry. Ligand-induced interactions between mAChR and ß-arrestin were examined using a ß-arrestin GPCR assay kit. RESULTS: Lidocaine reduced mAChR-mediated Ca2+ responses but did not change the intracellular Ca2+ concentration in non-stimulated cells. The membrane-impermeant lidocaine analog QX314 and procaine inhibited mAChR-mediated Ca2+ responses, with EC50 values of 48.0 and 20.4 µM, respectively, for 50 µM carbachol-stimulated Ca2+ responses. In the absence of extracellular Ca2+, the pretreatment of cells with QX314 reduced carbachol-induced Ca2+ release, indicating that QX314 reduced Ca2+ release from intracellular stores. Lidocaine and QX314 did not affect store-operated Ca2+ entry as they did not alter the thapsigargin-induced Ca2+ response. QX314 and procaine reduced the carbachol-mediated recruitment of ß-arrestin, and administration of procaine suppressed pilocarpine-induced salivary secretion in mice. CONCLUSION: Local anesthetics, including QX314, act on mAChR to reduce carbachol-induced Ca2+ release from intracellular stores and the recruitment of ß-arrestin. These findings support the notion that local anesthetics and their derivatives are starting points for the development of functional allosteric modulators of mAChR.

Heterogeneity of tethered agonist signaling in adhesion G protein-coupled receptors.

Adhesion G protein-coupled receptor (aGPCR) signaling influences development and homeostasis in a wide range of tissues. In the current model for aGPCR signaling, ligand binding liberates a conserved sequence that acts as an intramolecular, tethered agonist (TA), yet this model has not been evaluated systematically for all aGPCRs. Here, we assessed the TA-dependent activities of all 33 aGPCRs in a suite of transcriptional reporter, G protein activation, and ß-arrestin recruitment assays using a new fusion protein platform. Strikingly, only ∼50% of aGPCRs exhibited robust TA-dependent activation, and unlike other GPCR families, aGPCRs showed a notable preference for G12/13 signaling. AlphaFold2 predictions assessing TA engagement in the predicted intramolecular binding pocket aligned with the TA dependence of the cellular responses. This dataset provides a comprehensive resource to inform the investigation of all human aGPCRs and for targeting aGPCRs therapeutically.

Beneath the surface: endosomal GPCR signaling.

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) located at the cell surface bind extracellular ligands and convey intracellular signals via activation of heterotrimeric G proteins. Traditionally, G protein signaling was viewed to occur exclusively at this subcellular region followed by rapid desensitization facilitated by ß-arrestin (ßarr)-mediated G protein uncoupling and receptor internalization. However, emerging evidence over the past 15 years suggests that these ßarr-mediated events do not necessarily terminate receptor signaling and that some GPCRs continue to activate G proteins after having been internalized into endosomes. Here, we review the recently elucidated mechanistic basis underlying endosomal GPCR signaling and discuss physiological implications and pharmacological targeting of this newly appreciated signaling mode.

The role of G protein-coupled receptor kinases in GLP-1R ß-arrestin recruitment and internalisation.

The glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor (GLP-1R) is a validated clinical target for the treatment of type 2 diabetes and obesity. Unlike most G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs), the GLP-1R undergoes an atypical mode of internalisation that does not require ß-arrestins. While differences in GLP-1R trafficking and ß-arrestin recruitment have been observed between clinically used GLP-1R agonists, the role of G protein-coupled receptor kinases (GRKs) in affecting these pathways has not been comprehensively assessed. In this study, we quantified the contribution of GRKs to agonist-mediated GLP-1R internalisation and ß-arrestin recruitment profiles using cells where endogenous ß-arrestins, or non-visual GRKs were knocked out using CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing. Our results confirm the previously established atypical ß-arrestin-independent mode of GLP-1R internalisation and revealed that GLP-1R internalisation is dependent on the expression of GRKs. Interestingly, agonist-mediated GLP-1R ß-arrestin 1 and ß-arrestin 2 recruitment were differentially affected by endogenous GRK knockout with ß-arrestin 1 recruitment more sensitive to GRK knockout than ß-arrestin 2 recruitment. Moreover, individual overexpression of GRK2, GRK3, GRK5 or GRK6 in a newly generated GRK2/3/4/5/6 HEK293 cells, rescued agonist-mediated ß-arrestin 1 recruitment and internalisation profiles to similar levels, suggesting that there is no specific GRK isoform that drives these pathways. This study advances mechanistic understanding of agonist-mediated GLP-1R internalisation and provides novel insights into how GRKs may fine-tune GLP-1R signalling.

Systematic Assessment of Human CCR7 Signalling Using NanoBRET Biosensors Points towards the Importance of the Cellular Context.

The human CC chemokine receptor 7 (CCR7) is activated by two natural ligands, CC chemokine ligand 19 (CCL19) and 21 (CCL21). The CCL19-CCL21-CCR7 axis has been extensively studied in vitro, but there is still debate over whether CCL21 is an overall weaker agonist or if the axis displays biased signalling. In this study, we performed a systematic analysis at the transducer level using NanoBRET-based methodologies in three commonly used cellular backgrounds to evaluate pathway and ligand preferences, as well as ligand bias and the influence of the cellular system thereon. We found that both CCL19 and CCL21 activated all cognate G proteins and some non-cognate couplings in a cell-type-dependent manner. Both ligands recruited ß-arrestin1 and 2, but the potency was strongly dependent on the cellular system. Overall, CCL19 and CCL21 showed largely conserved pathway preferences, but small differences were detected. However, these differences only consolidated in a weak ligand bias. Together, these data suggest that CCL19 and CCL21 share mostly overlapping, weakly biased, transducer profiles, which can be influenced by the cellular context.

Muscarinic acetylcholine receptor-mediated phosphorylation of extracellular signal-regulated kinase in HSY salivary ductal cells involves distinct signaling pathways.

OBJECTIVES: Typical agonists of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs), including muscarinic acetylcholine receptors (mAChRs), activate both G-protein and ß-arrestin signaling systems, and are termed balanced agonists. In contrast, biased agonists selectively activate a single pathway, thereby offering therapeutic potential for the specific activation of that pathway. The mAChR agonists carbachol and pilocarpine are known to induce phosphorylation of extracellular signal-regulated kinase-1/2 (ERK1/2) via G-protein-dependent and -independent pathways, respectively. We investigated the involvement of ß-arrestin and its downstream mechanisms in the ERK1/2 phosphorylation induced by carbachol and pilocarpine in the human salivary ductal cell line, HSY cells. METHODS: HSY cells were stimulated with pilocarpine or carbachol, with or without various inhibitors. The cell lysates were analyzed by western blotting using the antibodies p44/p42MAPK and phosphor-p44/p42MAPK. RESULTS: Western blot analysis revealed that carbachol elicited greater stimulation of ERK1/2 phosphorylation compared to pilocarpine. ERK1/2 phosphorylation was inhibited by atropine and gefitinib, suggesting that mAChR activation induces transactivation of epidermal growth factor receptors (EGFR). Moreover, inhibition of carbachol-mediated ERK1/2 phosphorylation was achieved by GF-109203X (a PKC inhibitor), a ßARK1/GRK2 inhibitor, barbadin (a ß-arrestin inhibitor), pitstop 2 (a clathrin inhibitor), and dynole 34-2 (a dynamin inhibitor). In contrast, pilocarpine-mediated ERK1/2 phosphorylation was only inhibited by barbadin (a ß-arrestin inhibitor) and PP2 (a Src inhibitor). CONCLUSION: Carbachol activates both G-protein and ß-arrestin pathways, whereas pilocarpine exclusively activates the ß-arrestin pathway. Additionally, downstream of ß-arrestin, carbachol activates clathrin-dependent internalization, while pilocarpine activates Src.

Distinct roles of the extracellular surface residues of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor in ß-arrestin 1/2 signaling.

Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor (GLP-1R) is a prime drug target for type 2 diabetes and obesity. The ligand initiated GLP-1R interaction with G protein has been well studied, but not with ß-arrestin 1/2. Therefore, bioluminescence resonance energy transfer (BRET), mutagenesis and an operational model were used to evaluate the roles of 85 extracellular surface residues on GLP-1R in ß-arrestin 1/2 recruitment triggered by three representative GLP-1R agonists (GLP-1, exendin-4 and oxyntomodulin). Residues selectively regulated ß-arrestin 1/2 recruitment for diverse ligands, and ß-arrestin isoforms were identified. Mutation of residues K130-S136, L142 and Y145 on the transmembrane helix 1 (TM1)-extracellular domain (ECD) linker decreased ß-arrestin 1 recruitment but increased ß-arrestin 2 recruitment. Other extracellular loop (ECL) mutations, including P137A, Q211A, D222A and M303A selectively affected ß-arrestin 1 recruitment while D215A, L217A, Q221A, S223A, Y289A, S301A, F381A and I382A involved more in ß-arrestin 2 recruitment for the ligands. Oxyntomodulin engaged more broadly with GLP-1R extracellular surface to drive ß-arrestin 1/2 recruitment than GLP-1 and exendin-4; I147, W214 and L218 involved in ß-arrestin 1 recruitment, while L141, D215, L218, D293 and F381 in ß-arrestin 2 recruitment for oxyntomodulin particularly. Additionally, the non-conserved residues on ß-arrestin 1/2 C-domains contributed to interaction with GLP-1R. Further proteomic profiling of GLP-1R stably expressed cell line upon ligand stimulation with or without ß-arrestin 1/2 overexpression demonstrated both commonly and biasedly regulated proteins and pathways associated with cognate ligands and ß-arrestins. Our study offers valuable information about ligand induced ß-arrestin recruitment mediated by GLP-1R and consequent intracellular signaling events.