ProGlide-AngioSeal versus ProGlide-FemoSeal for vascular access hemostasis posttranscatheter aortic valve implantation.

BACKGROUND: The hybrid strategy combining plug-based and suture-based vascular closure devices (VCD) was introduced as a promising technique for vascular access hemostasis after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) with satisfactory outcomes. However, data comparing two plug-based VCDs each in the combination with a suture-based VCD, namely ProGlide/AngioSeal (P/AS) with ProGlide/FemoSeal (P/FS) VCDs, is still lacking. AIMS: To compare the 30-day outcome of the hybrid strategy using P/AS versus P/FS for vascular access site closure after TAVI. METHODS: A retrospective single-center observational study included 608 patients recruited from a prospective TAVI registry between 2016 and 2022. The composite endpoint was defined as any VCD-related major vascular complications and/or bleeding more than type 1 according to Valve Academic Research Consortium criteria. RESULTS: The current study reported a significantly higher rate of composite endpoint in P/AS group, which was driven by a higher rate of major bleeding (5.4% vs. 1.4%, p = 0.036). We also found a higher rate of VCD-related minor bleeding in P/AS group (16.3% vs. 8.1%, p = 0.013). Successful access site hemostasis was achieved in 71.7% of P/AS group versus 83.1% in P/FS group (p = 0.006). The presence of anterior wall calcification at the access site was significantly associated with the composite endpoint (adj odds ratio 2.49; 95% confidence interval (1.08-5.75), p = 0.032). CONCLUSION: The hybrid strategy for large bore vascular access closure using P/FS showed a potentially better 30-day outcomes compared with P/AS. The presence of anterior calcification at the access site carries a significant risk of VCD-related complications.

Axillary compared to brachial access for endovascular procedures.

OBJECTIVES: Limited knowledge exists regarding access site complication rates between trans-axillary and trans-brachial approaches with sheath sizes ≥6Fr. We retrospectively reviewed our institution experience with access site complications for percutaneous trans-axillary and trans-brachial arterial interventions using sheath sizes ranging from 6Fr to 10Fr. METHODS: We examined 67 endovascular interventions performed over 18 months, restricted to sheath sizes of 6Fr to 10Fr. Procedures utilizing trans-brachial (41 cases) and trans-axillary (26 cases) approaches under sonographic guidance were included. Cases involving hemodialysis accesses and those requiring surgical cut-down were excluded. The primary outcome measure was the occurrence of major access site complications (SIR grade-II/III) within 30 days, with data collected on hemostasis method, sheath size, and complications. Statistical analysis involved ANCOVA and Fisher's exact tests, with significance set at p < .05. RESULTS: Successful percutaneous arterial access was achieved in all cases using either approach (trans-axillary or trans-brachial). Closure devices were employed in all axillary punctures and in 71% of brachial punctures. Major access site complications occurred in 7 out of 41 cases (17%) in the trans-brachial group and in 4 out of 26 cases (15%) in the trans-axillary group. However, there was no statistically significant difference in complication rates between the two groups, regardless of access site or sheath size. CONCLUSION: Trans-axillary access serves as a safe and effective upper limb access method for percutaneous endovascular procedures requiring sheath size of 7Fr or larger when compared to trans-brachial approach.

Adverse Events in Open Surgical vs. Ultrasound-Guided Percutaneous Brachial Access for Endovascular Interventions.

Background: Advances in endovascular interventions have made endovascular approaches the first option for treating peripheral arterial diseases. Although radial artery access is commonly used for coronary procedures, the common femoral artery remains the most frequent site for endovascular treatments due to better ergonomics and proven technical success. Meanwhile, data on using upper extremity access via the brachial artery during complex endovascular aortic interventions are lacking. This study aimed to compare the incidence of access site complications between ultrasound-guided percutaneous brachial access (UPA) and open surgical incisional brachial access (OSA) in the management of peripheral arterial diseases. Methods: Patients who underwent treatment for peripheral arterial and aortic disease using brachial access from 2019 to 2023 were included in this study. The primary endpoint was the complication rate at the access site 30 days postoperatively. Access-related complications included bleeding requiring re-exploration, acute upper limb ischemia, thrombosis, pseudoaneurysm, arteriovenous fistula, and nerve injury associated with the brachial access. Results: Brachial access was performed on 485 patients (UPA, n = 320; OSA, n = 165). The mean operation time was 164.5 ± 45.4 min for the percutaneous procedure and 289.2 ± 79.4 min for the cutdown procedure (p = 0.003). Postprocedural hematoma occurred in 15 patients in the UPA group and 2 patients in the OSA group (p = 0.004). Thromboembolic events were observed in 9 patients in the percutaneous group and 3 patients in the OSA group. Reoperation was required for 23 patients in the percutaneous group and 8 patients in the cutdown group. Conclusions: The findings indicate that patients undergoing endovascular arterial interventions have a higher rate of brachial access complications in the UPA group compared to the OSA group.

Importance of pseudoaneurysms after TAVI - a retrospective analysis of 2063 patients.

Background: Bifemoral arterial access is common in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI), with a primary treatment access (TAVI access) and a secondary non-TAVI access. Pseudoaneurysm (PSA) is an important complication of femoral arterial puncture. Major vascular complications after TAVI are well described, but little is known about PSA. Patients and methods: A total of 2063 patients underwent transfemoral TAVI between January 2014 and January 2020. Vascular ultrasound of the common femoral artery was assessed before and after TAVI. We compared patient characteristics, periprocedural risk scores, procedural characteristics, and access site bleeding events according to Valve Academic Research Consortium 3 (VARC-3) criteria, length of stay (LOS), and all-cause mortality at one year between patients with (46) and without (2017) PSA. Results: The incidence of PSA after TAVI was 2.2% (46/2063). All PSA were successfully treated with ultrasound-guided manual compression (UGMC) or thrombin injection (UGTI) without complications. Patients with PSA had lower platelet counts (210×1000/µl vs. 234×1000/µl; p<0.05), more heart failure symptoms on admission (91% vs. 25%; p<0.05), were more often treated with (N)OACs for atrial fibrillation (AF; 54% vs. 38%; p <0.05), and were less often treated with aspirin (35% vs. 51%; p<0.03). Multivariate analysis identified secondary access site (odds ratio [OR] 8.11; p<0.001) and (N)OAC therapy (OR 1.31; p = 0.037) as risk factors for PSA development. PSA is associated with VARC-3 type 1-3 access site bleeding and longer LOS (15.2 ± 11.3 d vs. 11.6 ± 8.9 d; p<0.01), but this did not affect one year mortality (17% vs. 14%; p = 0.53). Conclusions: Pseudoaneurysms are an important complication after TAVI and are associated with access site bleeding and prolonged hospital stay. (N)OAC therapy and secondary access are important risk factors. Pseudoaneurysms can be safely and effectively treated with thrombin injection and do not affect one-year mortality.

Safety and Efficacy of Radial Artery Access for Peripheral Vascular Intervention: A Single-Center Experience.

Radial artery (RA) access has been increasingly utilized for coronary procedures because of lower rates of access-site complications and improved patient satisfaction. However, limited data are available for RA access for peripheral vascular intervention (PVI). We performed a retrospective review of 143 patients who underwent PVI through RA access from February 2020 to September 2022 at a single institution. Baseline characteristics and follow-up data were ascertained from a prospectively maintained institutional database. Of 491 PVI, 156 (31.8%) were performed through the RA. Anatomical locations for intervention were the femoral (44.8%), iliac (31.1%), popliteal (9.6%) peroneal (2.7%), tibial (9.9%), and subclavian (1.9%) arteries. Procedural access was obtained through the right RA (92.9%), left RA (4.5%), or right ulnar artery (2.6%) using the 6 French R2P Destination Slender sheath in 85, 105, and 119 cm lengths. Atherectomy was used in 34.7%. Mean contrast volume was 105.5 ml and the average fluoroscopy time was 18.5 minutes. Conversion to femoral access occurred in 3 cases (1.9%) because of arterial spasm and noncrossable lesions. Concomitant pedal access occurred in 2 cases (1.3%). Periprocedural complication rate was 3.84%, of which access-site hematoma was most common (3.2%); none required blood transfusion, surgical intervention, or additional hospital stay. There was 1 case (0.64%) of in-hospital stroke. The mortality rate at 30-day, 6-month, and 1-year was 1.4%, 2.8%, and 4.2%, respectively. In conclusion, RA access is feasible for diverse PVI, and future studies are needed to assess safety and benefit compared with femoral artery access.

Spinal Cord Infarction: Access Site Complication of Femoral Artery Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.

Spinal cord infarction (SCI) is an uncommon vascular syndrome that leads to neurologic abnormalities with multiple implicated causes. Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is a non-surgical invasive procedure used to relieve an arterial occlusion or narrowing that causes ischemia to the heart. This is usually performed by different methods and different arterial access sites. Here, we present a case of a patient who developed bilateral lower limb weakness eight days after a femoral artery PCI and was diagnosed with SCI. This case report aims to document a rare complication and highlight the most important demographic, investigation, management, risk factors, and prognosis data available in the literature.

Prognosis Impact and Prediction of Trans-Radial Access Failure in Patients With STEMI, A Nationwide Observational Study.

Trans-radial access (TRA) is the primary arterial approach for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). However, occasionally, a crossover to trans-femoral access is necessary because of unsuccessful TRA. The impact of failed TRA on the prognosis in STEMI patients and the utility of predictive models for TRA failure remains uncertain. Data from the Hungarian Myocardial Infarction Registry (January 2014 to December 2020) were analyzed. Primary endpoints were 1-year mortality and major adverse cardiovascular events. Propensity score matching was employed to create a balanced cohort for comparing successful and failed TRA. The impact of unsuccessful TRA on prognosis was evaluated using Cox regression analysis. Machine learning techniques were applied to predict TRA failure. The performance and the clinical applicability of the novel and previous prediction models were comprehensively evaluated. Of 76,625 registered patients, 34,293 (69.8 ± 13.4 years, male/female: 21,893/12,400) underwent TRA (33,573) or failed TRA (720) PCI for STEMI. After propensity score matching, in the unsuccessful TRA group, the risk of mortality (34.3% vs 22.5%, hazard ratio 1.6, 95% confidence interval 1.3 to 2.0, p <0.001) and major adverse cardiovascular events (37.4% vs 26.8%, hazard ratio 1.5, 95% confidence interval 1.3 to 1.8, p <0.001) were significantly higher. Door-to-balloon time did not differ significantly (p = 0.835). In predictive analysis, Regularized Discriminant Analysis emerged as the most promising model, surpassing previous prediction models (area under the curve: 0.66, sensitivity: 0.32, specificity: 0.86). Nevertheless, Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (GRACE) 2.0 score demonstrated a remarkable performance (area under the curve: 0.65, sensitivity: 0.51, specificity: 0.73). This study underscores the pivotal role of successful TRA in enhancing outcomes in STEMI cases, advocating for its prioritization. The inability to conclude interventions through this approach is linked to a poorer prognosis, even in risk-adjusted analyses. Our findings indicate that prediction models utilizing clinical parameters do not outperform the established GRACE 2.0 algorithm, questioning their utility. In conclusion, the results emphasize the significance of TRA success and the continued relevance of the GRACE score in clinical decision-making to optimize patient outcomes.

Uncommon Carotid Artery Stenting Complications: A Series by Images.

AIMS: To describe through emblematic images rare but clinically relevant carotid artery stenting complications that occurred at two high-volume centres for carotid artery stenting (CAS). BACKGROUND: CAS is an alternative to carotid endarterectomy (CEA) for the treatment of carotid artery stenosis in patients judged to be at high risk for CEA. CAS complications range between 1 and 9% and are higher in older patients complaining of neurological symptoms at the time of presentation. Besides periprocedural or early-after-procedure stroke, which remains the true Achilles' heel of CAS, other dramatic complications might compromise the clinical outcomes of this procedure. METHODS: Five infrequent complications, out of more than 1000 CAS performed in the years 2016-2021, have been described. RESULTS: Among CAS complications, acute carotid stent thrombosis, rescue retrieval of a disconnected distal cerebral embolic protection device, plaque prolapse after carotid stenting, cerebral hyperperfusion syndrome (CHS), and radial artery long sheath entrapment requiring surgical intervention were found to account for 0.3% of the total number of procedures performed by operators with high CAS volume. CONCLUSIONS: Unusual CAS complications may infrequently occur, even in hands of expert operators. To know how to deal with such complications might help interventionalists to improve CAS performance.

Femoral Arterial Calcification and Plug- vs. Suture-Based Closure Device Strategies Post-Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation: Insights From CHOICE-CLOSURE.

Background: The location and severity of vascular calcification may influence closure device success in transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve implantation. The aim of this study was to analyze effects of vascular access-site calcification on vascular and bleeding outcomes post-transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Methods: The Randomized Comparison of CatHeter-based Strategies fOr Interventional ACcess SitE CLOSURE during Transfemoral Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation (CHOICE-CLOSURE) trial assigned 516 patients to access site closure using a pure plug-based technique (MANTA, Teleflex) or a primary suture-based technique (ProGlide, Abbott Vascular). The principal finding of the overall study was that access-site or access-related complications were more common after the plug-based strategy compared to percutaneous closure with a suture-based strategy. In this predefined subgroup analysis, the overall cohort was split into patients with and without anterior calcification at the access site and divided by degree of calcification severity using the classification system developed in the MANTA vs. suture-based vascular closure after transcatHeter aortic valve replacement (MASH) trial. Differences in bleeding and vascular complications were compared. The primary endpoint consisted of access-site- or access-related major and minor vascular complications. Results: There were more access-site-related major and minor vascular complications for patients with anterior wall vascular calcification and MASH severe calcification. No significant interaction with choice of closure technique in terms of access-site-related major and minor vascular complications was observed (odds ratio 1.70, 95% CI 0.77-3.78, p = 0.19 for the primary endpoint in plug- vs. suture-based strategy in patients with anterior calcification, odds ratio 1.78, 95% CI 0.56-5.65, p = 0.33 for primary endpoint in plug- vs. suture-based strategy with MASH severe calcification, pint = 0.97 for anterior calcification, pint = 0.95 for MASH severe calcification). Conclusions: The total number of vascular complications was found to be greater in the presence of anterior and MASH severe calcification. Overall, the presence of anterior or severe calcification does not significantly modify the efficacy of the suture-based strategy compared to the plug-based strategy.

Dermatological Manifestations in Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease: A Review.

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a progressive disease and has multiple clinical manifestations; when CKD reaches the end stage, at least one cutaneous manifestation appears due to some increased toxin levels or a constant proinflammatory state. Nonspecific manifestations include pruritus, xerosis, pigmentation disorders, acquired ichthyosis, purpuric spots, and nail disorders. Some specific manifestations are bullous dermatoses, acquired perforating dermatoses (APD), eruptive xanthoma, access site infections, calcifying disorders, and nephrogenic systemic fibrosis (NSF). All these cutaneous changes negatively impact patients; early recognition and diagnosis of these dermatoses will make a difference in their quality of treatment. Exploring a patient's skin is fundamental to suspect some diseases and increased toxin levels; pruritus occurs when uremic toxins are raised, and nail disorders are associated with hypoalbuminemia. This review provides the clinician with information on the clinical manifestations that occur in CKD, including epidemiology, pathophysiology, clinical manifestations, diagnosis, histopathology, treatment, and life impact of the dermatoses in CKD.

Combined ultrasound and angiographic guidance to facilitate transradial access procedures.

The introduction of transradial access for percutaneous coronary diagnostic and interventional procedures has led to a decrease in access site complications. The aim of this paper is to propose a combined stepwise technical approach where real time ultrasound ("echo-first" approach) can be used to select the best vascular access and, together with angiography, to manage the potential obstacles that may occur during transradial procedures. In each section, we summarize some tips and tricks based on both our experience and current literature that can be easily implemented in daily practice to increase the success of transradial procedures.

Impact of Access Site on Periprocedural Bleeding and Cerebral and Coronary Events in High-Bleeding-Risk Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Findings from the RIVA-PCI Trial.

INTRODUCTION: The preference for using transradial access (TRA) over transfemoral access (TFA) in patients requiring percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is based on evidence suggesting that TRA is associated with less bleeding and fewer vascular complications, shorter hospital stays, improved quality of life, and a potential beneficial effect on mortality. We have limited study data comparing the two access routes in a patient population with atrial fibrillation (AF) undergoing PCI, who have a particular increased risk of bleeding, while AF itself is associated with an increased risk of thromboembolism. METHODS: Using data from the RIVA-PCI registry, which includes patients with AF undergoing PCI, we analyzed a high-bleeding-risk (HBR) cohort. These patients were predominantly on oral anticoagulants (OAC) for AF, and the PCI was performed via radial or femoral access. Endpoints examined were in-hospital bleeding (BARC 2-5), cerebral events (TIA, hemorrhagic or ischemic stroke) and coronary events (stent thrombosis and myocardial infarction). RESULTS: Out of 1636 patients, 854 (52.2%) underwent TFA, while 782 (47.8%) underwent the procedure via TRA, including nine patients with brachial artery puncture. The mean age was 75.5 years. Groups were similar in terms of age, sex distribution, AF type, cardiovascular history, risk factors, and comorbidities, except for a higher incidence of previous bypass surgeries, heart failure, hyperlipidemia, and chronic kidney disease (CKD) with a glomerular filtration rate (GFR) < 60 ml/min in the TFA group. No clinically relevant differences in antithrombotic therapy and combinations were present at the time of PCI. However, upon discharge, transradial PCI patients had a higher rate of triple therapy, while dual therapy was preferred after transfemoral procedures. Radial access was more frequently chosen for non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) and unstable angina pectoris (UAP) cases (NSTEMI 26.6% vs. 17.0%, p < 0.0001; UAP 21.5% vs. 14.5%, p < 0.001), while femoral access was more common for elective PCI (60.3% vs. 44.1%, p < 0.0001). No differences were observed for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Both groups had similar rates of cerebral events (TFA 0.2% vs. TRA 0.3%, p = 0.93), but the TFA group had a higher incidence of bleeding (BARC 2-5) (4.2% vs. 1.5%, p < 0.01), mainly driven by BARC 3 bleeding (1.5% vs. 0.4%, p < 0.05). No significant differences were found for stent thrombosis and myocardial infarction (TFA 0.2% vs. TRA 0.3%, p = 0.93; TFA 0.4% vs. TRA 0.1%, p = 0.36). CONCLUSIONS: In HBR patients with AF undergoing PCI for acute or chronic coronary syndrome, the use of TRA might be associated with a decrease in in-hospital bleeding, while not increasing the risk of embolic or ischemic events compared to femoral access. Further studies are required to confirm these preliminary findings.

Access site complications in thoracic endovascular aortic repair.

BACKGROUND: Percutaneous access and use of vascular closure devices facilitate thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) procedures during local anesthesia and allow immediate detection of signs of spinal ischemia. However, the very large bore access (usually ≥22F sheath) associated with TEVAR increases the risk of vascular complications. In this study, we sought to define the safety and feasibility of two percutaneous femoral artery closure devices during TEVAR, in terms of access site vascular complications and major, life-threatening, or fatal bleeding (≥major) within 48 hours. Access site vascular complications were defined as technical failure of vascular closure or later formation of pseudoaneurysm. METHODS: From March 2010 to December 2022, 199 transfemoral TEVAR were performed at Helsinki University Central Hospital, Finland. We retrospectively categorized these into three groups, based on surgeon preference for the access technique and femoral artery closure method: (1) surgical cut-down and vessel closure, n = 85 (42.7%), (2) percutaneous access and vascular closure with suture-based ProGlide, n = 56 (28.1%), or (3) percutaneous access and vascular closure with ultrasound-guided plug-based MANTA, n = 58 (29.1%). The primary outcome measure was technical success of vascular closure and access site vascular complications during index hospitalization. Secondary outcome measures were ≥major bleeding, early mortality, and hospital stay. RESULTS: The technical success rate was 97.6% vs 91.1% vs 93.1% for surgical cut-down, ProGlide, and MANTA, respectively (P = .213). The rate of access site vascular complication was 3.5% vs 8.9% vs 10.3%, respectively (P = .290), with two pseudoaneurysms detected postoperatively and conservatively managed in the MANTA group. The vascular closure method was not associated with increased risk of ≥major bleeding, early mortality, or hospital stay on univariate analysis. Predictors for ≥major bleeding after TEVAR in multivariable analysis were urgent procedure (odds ratio: 2.8, 95% confidence interval: 1.4-5.5; P = .003) and simultaneous aortic branch revascularization (odds ratio: 2.7, 95% confidence interval: 1.3-5.4; P = .008). CONCLUSIONS: In this study, the technical success rates of the percutaneous techniques demonstrated their feasibility during TEVAR. However, the number of access site complications for percutaneous techniques was higher compared with open approach, although the difference was not statistically significant. In the lack of evidence, the safety of the new MANTA plug-based vascular closure for TEVAR warrants further investigation.

"Piggyback Pigtails": Simplifying secondary transradial access for TAVR.

Minimalist approaches have evolved for TAVR over the last years with impact on in-hospital stay and patient safety. As part of this concept, transradial secondary arterial access is capable of reducing vascular and bleeding complications. Yet, steering of the marker pigtail catheter in the descending aorta might by fluoroscopic imaging sometimes be challenging. In our manuscript, we present a very simple "piggyback" technique, simplifying management of transradial secondary access in transfemoral TAVR.

Efficacy and safety of sheathless guiding catheter for distal radial approach.

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of a sheathless guiding system in patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with distal radial access (DRA). BACKGROUND: Hyperion™ Sheathless® guiding catheter (Asahi Intecc, Japan), one of the latest 6-Fr guiding systems for transradial PCI characterized by novel outer dilator, is considered to facilitate smooth insertion of the catheter to the artery and may contribute to further reduction of access site complications in DRA. METHODS: Between October 2018 and January 2023, 286 patients underwent PCI with a Hyperion™ Sheathless® guiding catheter with DRA at two Japanese hospitals. Procedural success, bleeding complications, and radial artery occlusion (RAO) detected by Doppler ultrasonography were assessed. RESULTS: Mean age of the patients was 72.7 years, and 236 patients (82.5 %) were male. The target lesions were located in the right coronary artery, left anterior descending artery, left circumflex artery, and left main trunk in 81, 44, 50 patients, and 18 patients respectively. Procedural success rate was 99.7 % with no patients requiring conversion to conventional radial access. Two patients presented with a forearm hematoma equivalent to an Early Discharge After Transradial Stenting of Coronary Arteries Study hematoma classification Grade II and 23 with Grade I. No patient presented minor or major bleeding according to the Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction bleeding classification. RAO at 30-day follow-up was observed in 6 out of 277 patients (2.2 %). CONCLUSIONS: 6-Fr sheathless guiding system for PCI via DRA is feasible and associated with a low incidence of access site complications.

A new very-small-bore Simmons guiding sheath for transradial neurointervention: Technical note and initial experience.

Transradial access during neurointerventions has increased in popularity because of reduced complications and patient preference. Nevertheless, transradial cannulation into the left common carotid artery can be difficult technically because of the lack of catheter support in the aortic arch. Furthermore, the use of large sheaths can increase the risk of complications at the access site. Here, we developed a new very-small-bore transradial system using a 3F Simmons guiding sheath, to increase the procedural success rate and minimize access-site complications. This system can represent a valuable treatment option for neurointerventions and has the potential to expand the indications for transradial access.

Transradial intervention in dialysis patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: a Japanese nationwide registry study.

Aims: Transradial intervention (TRI) for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is used to reduce periprocedural complications. However, its effectiveness and safety for patients on dialysis are not well established. We aimed to investigate the association of TRI with in-hospital complications in dialysis patients undergoing PCI. Methods and results: We included 44 462 patients on dialysis who underwent PCI using Japanese nationwide PCI registry data (2019-21) regardless of acute or chronic coronary syndrome. Patients were categorized based on access site: TRI, transfemoral intervention (TFI). Periprocedural access site bleeding complication requiring transfusion was the primary outcome and in-hospital death, and other periprocedural complications were the secondary outcomes. Matched weighted analysis was performed for TRI and TFI. Here, 8267 (18.6%) underwent TRI, and 36 195 (81.4%) underwent TFI. Patients who received TRI were older and had lower rates of comorbidities than those who received TFI. Access site bleeding rate and in-hospital death were significantly lower in the TRI group (0.1% vs. 0.7%, P < 0.001; 1.8% vs. 3.2%, P < 0.001, respectively). After adjustment, TRI was associated with a lower risk of access site bleeding (odds ratio [OR] [95% confidence interval (CI)]: 0.19 [0.099-0.38]; P < 0.001) and in-hospital death (OR [95% CI]: 0.79 [0.65-0.96]; P = 0.02). Other periprocedural complications between TRI and TFI were not significantly different. Conclusion: In patients undergoing dialysis and PCI, TRI had a lower risk of access site bleeding and in-hospital death than TFI. This suggests that TRI may be safer for this patient population.

Routine postaccess-closure angiography to detect vascular complications following transfemoral TAVR.

BACKGROUND: Vascular complications following transfemoral TAVR are associated with increased morbidity and mortality. Measures that may mitigate this risk are important. AIM: To evaluate the utility of routine, access-vessel angiography post sheath-removal in the detection and management of complications in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). METHODS: This was a retrospective study of 512 consecutive patients who underwent transfemoral TAVR with routine post access-closure angiography from the radial artery. Rates of mild angiographically evident bleeding, bleeding requiring surgery/interventional-radiology, ischemia, 90-day access-site-related events, and major and minor vascular complications using Valve Academic Research Consortium 3 definitions were recorded. RESULTS: Of 512 patients, digital subtraction angiography (DSA) was undertaken via the radial artery in 467 patients (91%). In the remaining patients (9%) DSA was either not attempted, due to concerns regarding kidney disease and contrast volume, or failed due to anatomical factors (aortic tortuosity/calcification). Significant chronic kidney disease was present at baseline in 72.4% of this cohort (stages III-IV or dialysis). Ninety-four percent of cases underwent TAVR using a balloon-expandable platform. Mild iliofemoral extravasation was observed in 7.7% of the DSA cases. These cases were managed by manual compression with none requiring any vascular intervention subsequently. Valve Academic Research Consortium 3 major and minor access-site-related complications were observed in 0.4% and 12.2%, respectively. Access-site-related bleeding and ischemic events requiring interventional-radiology or vascular-surgery were observed in 0.9% and 1.7% of the DSA cases, respectively. No new renal replacement therapy was needed in any of the DSA cases. Discharge to 90-day access-related complications was 0.8%. CONCLUSIONS: Routine post access-closure angiography is feasible via the radial artery in patients undergoing transfemoral TAVR and appears safe. It facilitates early identification of complications and mitigates risk by enabling prompt action to be taken. Larger studies are needed to confirm these findings.

Implementation of a new surveillance system for dialysis-associated infection events in outpatient dialysis facilities in Germany.

INTRODUCTION: Patients receiving maintenance haemodialysis are at risk of catheter-related infections. Up to now, there has been no standardized surveillance tool in Germany to evaluate infection events in haemodialysis outpatients. As such, this study aimed to implement an online-based surveillance tool in outpatient dialysis facilities, and to report the first national surveillance data for haemodialysis patients in Germany from October 2019 until September 2021. METHODS: Outpatient dialysis facilities reported three types of dialysis-associated infection event (DAIE): bloodstream infections, intravenous antimicrobial starts, and local access site infections. Denominator data were provided by the number of haemodialysis treatments at each facility per month. DAIE rates stratified by vascular access type were calculated. RESULTS: In total, 43 outpatient dialysis facilities reported 723 DAIEs, including 63 bloodstream infections, 439 intravenous antimicrobial starts, and 221 local access site infections. The overall incidence of DAIEs was 0.51 per 1000 dialysis treatments (723/1,413,457) during the surveillance period. The overall incidence of DAIEs was 0.13 per 1000 dialysis treatments among patients with arteriovenous fistulas (AVFs; 126/990,392), 0.41 per 1000 dialysis treatments among patients with arteriovenous grafts (41/99,499), and 1.68 per 1000 dialysis treatments among patients with central venous catheters (CVCs; 535/318,757). The rate ratio of DAIEs between CVC and AVF rates was 13.2 (95% confidence interval 10.9-16.0; P<0.001). DISCUSSION: These 2-year infection data represent the first standardized data of outpatient dialysis facilities in Germany. Rates of infection were highest among patients with CVCs compared with other vascular access types. This online-based surveillance tool may be helpful to identify effective targets for infection prevention measures in haemodialysis patients.

Smaller diameter sheaths are required to safely perform transradial neurointerventions.

We read with great interest the paper titled "Transradial access with Simmons guiding catheter for carotid artery stenting: Feasibility and procedural complications in a single-center experience" by Muszynski et al. The authors concluded that a transradial carotid artery stenting (CAS) using a Glidesheath Slender 7F Introducer/7F Envoy Simmons 2 catheter system was feasible with a high procedural success rate and low access site complication rate. We completely agree with their conclusions. In this study, large-diameter sheaths were used. Large sheaths increase the risk of developing radial artery spasms. Interventionalists must be aware that radial artery spasm can not only require an access crossover, but can also cause severe access site complications, such as eversion or avulsion of the radial artery, catheter/sheath entrapment, and compartment syndrome. A 6F Simmons guiding sheath has a smaller outer diameter than the Glidesheath Slender 7F Introducer does, and it offers a large-bore working channel compatible with a 10-mm diameter Wallstent and Acculink. Transradial CAS with a 6F Simmons guiding sheath has previously yielded a high procedural success rate without serious access site complications. Nevertheless, we believe that a further decrease in the sheath diameter is required to safely perform transradial neurointerventions in more patients.