Challenges and opportunities in access to care for systemic lupus erythematosus patients across Europe and worldwide.

SLE presents significant challenges for patients and health-care professionals (HCPs), both across Europe and worldwide. Improving health-care outcomes for patients with SLE requires a comprehensive understanding of patient disease pathways. In particular, the geographical distance between SLE patients and specialized care centres, combined with the scarcity of rheumatologists, exacerbates delays in diagnosis and management. Also, the initial SLE symptoms can often be non-specific, and providing guidelines for primary HCPs and other non-specialists is extremely important. Improvement in access to treatment is also important, with several recently approved therapies for SLE not being available in several European countries and many low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Furthermore, in the LMICs in which these treatments are available, they are not always covered by the health-care system, making their access almost impossible for those of lower socio-economic status. A number of provisions are already in place within the European Union, to improve access to care for patients with rare and complex diseases, including those with SLE. In particular, European Reference Networks (ERNs), such the ERN for Autoimmune Diseases ReCONNET, are virtual networks involving HCPs across Europe with the aim of improving the care of patients with rare and complex diseases that require highly specialized treatment and a concentration of knowledge and resources. In addition, lupus patient organizations such as Lupus Europe play a crucial role in raising awareness of SLE and advocating for improved access to care. Together, we can work towards a future where all people living with lupus receive the comprehensive and timely care they deserve.

Refining research on access to gynecologic cancer care: The DIMeS framework.

BACKGROUND: Despite its importance, there is no consensus definition of access to care, and several fundamental philosophical questions about access remain unanswered. Lack of clarity impedes interventional research designed to develop and test methods of correcting barriers to access. To help remedy this problem, we propose a conceptual framework to help guide empirical research about access to gynecologic cancer care. METHODS: Relevant philosophical and empirical literature was reviewed and analyzed to highlight key elements needed to refine research on access to care. RESULTS: The DIMeS framework involves 1) choice and justification of a Definition of access to cancer care that will guide research; 2) Identification of essential gynecologic cancer care services for which access disparities are ethically unacceptable; 3) quantitative MEasurement of specific parameters that affect access to care; and 4) Selection of a target threshold on measured parameters above which access is acceptable. CONCLUSIONS: The DIMeS framework provides clarity and reproducibility for investigators seeking to develop and test interventions to improve cancer health equity. This framework should be considered for use in research on access to gynecologic cancer care.

Bridging distances and saving costs: insights from a pilot project of telerheumatology in a rural area of Pakistan.

Enhancing access to healthcare remains a formidable challenge in rural regions of low- and lower-middle-income countries. Amid evolving healthcare challenges, telerheumatology provides opportunities to bridge gaps and expand access to rheumatology care, particularly in remote areas. We describe a pilot telerheumatology program and its cost-, time-, and travel-saving potential in a remote rural setting in northern Pakistan. The telerheumatology program commenced at the Pakistan Institute of Medical Sciences Islamabad, providing services through video consultations to a basic health unit in the Gilgit-Baltistan region. Patients visiting from the Gilgit-Baltistan region willing to participate were recruited in the program. Demographics and logistical metrics were recorded in a dedicated registry. A total of 533 consultations were carried out from April 2022 to April 2023. The majority of the patients were female (318/533, 59.7%). The median age of patients was 50 ± 15.7 years. The average wait time for consultation was 20 ± 13 min. The average travel time to reach telecentre was 59 ± 53 min. The average travel cost to reach telecentre was 379 ± 780 PKR (1.85 ± 3.81 USD). The average duration of consultation was 15 ± 5 min. The most common diagnosis for consultation was knee osteoarthritis (237, 44.5%), chronic low back pain (118, 22.1%), and rheumatoid arthritis (42, 7.9%). On average, patients saved 787 ± 29 km of distance, 15 ± 1 h of traveling, and 6702 ± 535 PKR (33 ± 3 USD) that would have been required to travel to our tertiary care hospital. Telerheumatology substantially reduced travel time, distance, and cost for patients. It has the potential to deliver outpatient rheumatology consultation in an economically efficient manner, effectively breaking geographical barriers and expanding access to essential services for patients in remote areas.

Geographic and economic influences on benralizumab prescribing for severe asthma in Japan.

Benralizumab, a monoclonal antibody targeting IL-5 receptors, reduces exacerbations and oral corticosteroid requirements for severe, uncontrolled eosinophilic asthma. In Japan, geographic disparities in asthma outcomes suggest differential prescribing and access. This study aimed to quantify regional prescribing variations for benralizumab nationwide. Using Japan's National Database (NDB) of insurance claims (2009-2019), benralizumab standardized claim ratios (SCRs) were calculated for 47 prefectures. Correlations between SCRs and other biologics' SCRs, economic variables like average income, and physician densities were evaluated through univariate analysis and multivariate regressions. Income-related barriers to optimal prescribing were examined. Wide variation emerged in benralizumab SCRs, from 40.1 to 184.2 across prefectures. SCRs strongly correlated with omalizumab (r = 0.61, p < 0.00001) and mepolizumab (r = 0.43, p = 0.0024). Average monthly income also positively correlated with benralizumab SCRs (r = 0.45, p = 0.0016), whereas lifestyle factors were insignificant. Respiratory specialist density modestly correlated with SCRs (r = 0.29, p = 0.047). In multivariate regressions, average income remained the most robust predictor (B = 0.74, p = 0.022). Benralizumab SCRs strongly associate with income metrics more than healthcare infrastructure/population factors. Many regions show low SCRs, constituting apparent prescribing gaps. Access barriers for advanced asthma therapies remain inequitable among Japan's income strata. Addressing affordability alongside specialist allocation can achieve better prescribing quality and asthma outcomes.

The impact of COVID-19 pandemic on patient selection and access to care, approach type, and postoperative outcomes in bariatric surgery.

BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic had affected the health systems across the world since early 2020 with a concern about access to medical care during the first wave of COVID-19 pandemic. OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to examine how the COVID-19 pandemic influenced patient selection, approach type, and postoperative outcomes in elective bariatric surgery. SETTING: United States. METHODS: Data from the MBSAQIP database for the years 2016-2020 were queried. Wilcoxon rank-sum test and Fisher's exact test were employed for continuous and categorical variables, respectively. Postoperative outcomes within 30 days were assessed separately and based on the Clavien-Dindo (CD) classification of III-V. χ2 test and logistic regression were used to compare outcomes between procedure and approach types, as well as surgical operation periods. RESULTS: A total of 741,620 patients underwent robotic and laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy and Roux-en-Y gastric-bypass. The cases performed in 2020 exhibited lower comorbidities and postoperative complications compared to prepandemic years, regardless of the approach type. Notably, the proportion of White patients decreased during the pandemic, while there was an increase in the number of African American and Hispanic patients who had bariatric surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Patients who underwent bariatric surgery during the COVID-19 pandemic appeared to be healthier with fewer comorbidities and experienced fewer adverse postoperative outcomes compared to those who had surgery prior to the pandemic. This study highlights the limited access to bariatric surgery for high-risk patients during the pandemic.

Point-of-care testing preferences 2020-2022: Trends over the years.

Background: The use of point-of-care (POC) tests prior to the COVID-19 pandemic was relatively infrequent outside of the health care context. Little is known about how public opinions regarding POC tests have changed during the pandemic. Methods: We redeployed a validated survey to uncompensated volunteers to assess preferences for point-of-care testing (POCT) benefits and concerns between June and September 2022. We received a total of 292 completed surveys. Linear regression analysis was used to compare differences in survey average response scores (ARSs) from 2020 to 2022. Results: Respondent ARSs indicated agreement for all 16 POCT benefits in 2022. Of 14 POCT concerns, there were only 2 statements that respondents agreed with most frequently, which were that "Insurance might not cover the costs of the POC test" (ARS 0.9, ± 1.0) and "POC tests might not provide a definitive result" (ARS 0.1, ± 1.0). Additionally, when comparing survey responses from 2020 to 2022, we observed 8 significant trends for POCT harms and benefits. Conclusion: The public's opinion on POC tests has become more favorable over time. However, concerns regarding the affordability and reliability of POCT results persist. We suggest that stakeholders address these concerns by developing accurate POC tests that continue to improve care and facilitate access to health care for all.

Experiences of racism and racial disparities in health care among children and youth with autism and their caregivers: a systematic review.

PURPOSE: Although the health benefits of early diagnosis and therapeutic approaches for children and youth with autism spectrum disorder (ASD), racial disparities persist. This systematic review explored the experiences of racism and racial disparities in health care among children and youth with ASD and their caregivers. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review, drawing on six international databases. Two reviewers screened titles, abstracts, and full texts. Thirty-seven studies met our inclusion criteria and we applied a narrative synthesis to develop themes. RESULTS: Four themes were identified: (1) experiences and aspects of racism and racial disparities (i.e., language and cultural barriers, poor quality health care interactions, stereotypes and discrimination, family and community stigma, and indirect barriers); (2) racial disparities in health care (i.e., screening and referral, diagnosis, health care services, and care coordination and medication); (3) facilitators to accessing health care services; and (4) recommendations from caregivers. CONCLUSIONS: This review highlights the extensive racial disparities experienced by children with autism. More research is needed to explore youth's perspectives on racism in addition to exploring potential interventions to address racial disparities and improve health equity for youth with ASD.

Racial minoritized youth with autism experience many barriers in accessing health care and there is an urgent need to address the systemic racism within our health care systems.Health care leaders and decision-makers should advocate for policy and systems change to enhance equitable access to health services for all youth with disabilities, especially those who belong to minoritized groups.Health care providers should consider engaging in relevant training to provide culturally safe and appropriate services for racially diverse clients with autism.Health care providers and decision-makers should work together to remove barriers to accessing health care for racial minoritized youth with autism.

Waiting for transgender care and its effects on health and equality: a mixed-methods population study in the Netherlands.

Background: Access to gender-affirming medical care has life-saving effects on transgender and gender diverse (TGD) individuals. An increasing number of TGD individuals seek care which led to waiting times of years. We assessed the duration and effects of excessive waiting for gender-affirming care. Methods: In this mixed-methods cross-sectional population study, conducted in the Netherlands between June and August 2019, all TGD individuals with experiences with receiving/applying for gender-affirming medical care could participate. Data of participants waiting for care was primarily analyzed. Demographic characteristics and requested care (multiple-choice questions) and the effects of waiting on health were surveyed (open-ended questions). Descriptive statistics were calculated per treatment, and differences in participant characteristics between those waiting for and already in care were assessed through Chi squared tests and post-hoc testing of residuals. Open text answers were thematically analyzed. Findings: Of all 975 participants, 431 (44.2%) waited for gender-affirming medical care. For 10 out of 20 treatment modalities, the median waiting period was more than a year. Participants already in care were on average higher educated and less-frequently non-binary. Subjective effects of waiting were (very) negative for most treatments. Qualitative findings showed that long waiting was associated with a range of psychosocial distress, poorer health, increasing healthcare consumption, and increased inequality between TGD individuals. Interpretation: Findings confirm that TGD individuals encounter long waiting times in multiple stages of their gender-affirming medical care. Waiting affects both physical and psychosocial health. Individual resilience and resources can mitigate these experiences, which increase inequality within this already marginalized group. Funding: Ministry of Health, Welfare and Sport of the Netherlands and Zorgverzekeraars Nederland (Healthcare Insurers Netherlands).

Advancing Oral Health Equity through Medical-Dental Integration: Dental hygienists as catalysts for change in an evolving health care system.

This report explores the changing landscape of oral health care delivery in the United States, highlighting the evolving role of dental hygienists. The 2021 National Institutes of Health report "Oral Health in America: Advances and Challenges" has become a key milestone in addressing oral health inequities, acknowledging the important role that dental hygienists could play in expanding innovative care models, and promoting medical-dental integration (MDI). The Rainbow Model of Integrated Care offers a framework to examine facilitators of MDI care models, revealing supportive policies, interprofessional collaborative practice, incremental change, and local leadership as some of the crucial components needed for success. Dental hygienists emerge as catalysts for change, as such, the overarching aim of this report is to contribute to the broader conversation about optimizing oral health care accessibility through integrated care models led by dental hygienists.

Medical-Dental Integration in Ohio: Improving prevention and coordination at the local level.

Access to high-quality, preventive oral health care is fundamental for an individual to achieve positive health outcomes. Recognizing that health is influenced by where a person lives, it is important to consider how systems of care must adapt to meet the changing needs of a community over time. Medical-dental integration is a critical component designed to enhance and broaden the oral health care delivery model. MORE Care® is a framework for communities to leverage their resources and relationships by providing tools and resources to integrate preventive oral health services into primary care settings. This report will show how local stakeholders advocated for an innovative approach to improve oral health gaps for children in Ohio. The MORE Care Ohio pilot is expanding access to preventive oral health services by featuring medical-dental integration to close patient care gaps and build an integrated oral health network. Providing a framework for medical and dental teams to collaborate, seven clinical practices (three medical and four dental) agreed to participate in a 9-month learning collaborative and 16-months of performance monitoring.

Community Oral Health Initiative: Driving value-based transformation in North Carolina.

CareQuest Institute for Oral Health's mission is to improve the oral health of all. One way to achieve this is through programmatic initiatives, which train dental clinics to provide equitable, integrated and accessible care for their communities. The Community Oral Health Transformation (COrHT) Initiative, allowed CareQuest Institute to collaborate with the North Carolina Oral Health Collaboration (NCOHC) and Blue Cross Blue Shield (BCBS) of North Carolina Foundation to implement and support the initiative in North Carolina. This mixed methods study was designed to collect quantitative and qualitative data while 11 dental clinics and a control clinic participated in the program through the end of the program. Quantitative data included patient demographics, claims data, and financial and data measures. Descriptive statistics of participating clinics and the control clinic were analyzed, and aggregated clinic data showed improvements in patient care delivery measures. Qualitative interviews were also conducted at midpoint and conclusion, and an outcome evaluation was completed. This short report will provide readers with results from the COrHT Initiative, with an emphasis on medical-dental integration (MDI) as an integral component of comprehensive, person-centered care. The evaluation of programmatic strengths and weaknesses has been included to identify the potential for future implementation, sustainability, and policy making.

Oral Health Screening by MassHealth Accountable Care Organizations: An opportunity for equity-focused interventions.

Establishing reliable access to dental services for publicly insured patients is an important part of achieving equitable oral health care. In 2023, an oral health screening requirement was added to the MassHealth Accountable Care Organization contract, which has the capacity to affect over 1.3 million members enrolled in MassHealth Accountable Care Organizations throughout the state. The goal of the oral health screening requirement is to identify MassHealth-insured patients who do not have reliable access to dental services and to provide them with resources to establish a dental home with a MassHealth-participating dentist. Primary care providers were surveyed, and results indicate a need for a care coordination mechanism to assist MassHealth-insured patients with establishing a dental home, in addition to an option to request telehealth-enabled and/or urgent dental appointments. This report describes the oral health screening program at one MassHealth Accountable Care Organization and presents some of the data collected during the first year of its implementation, in addition to discussing how this data is being used to guide equity-focused interventions with the potential for policy implications.

Health care access barriers among metropolitan and nonmetropolitan populations of eight geographically diverse states, 2018.

INTRODUCTION: Nonmetropolitan populations face frequent health care access barriers compared to their metropolitan counterparts, but differences in the number of these barriers across groups are not known. Our objective was to examine the differences in health care access barriers across metropolitan, micropolitan, and noncore populations. METHODS: We used Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System data from the optional "Health Care Access" module to perform a cross-sectional analysis examining access barriers across levels of rurality using bivariate analyses and Poisson models. Access barriers were operationalized as a count ranging from 0 to 5, reflective of the number of financial barriers and nonfinancial barriers. RESULTS: Micropolitan and noncore respondents had lower educational attainment, were older, and were less racially/ethnically diverse than metropolitan respondents. They also reported more barriers, including lacking health insurance, medical debt, and foregoing care or medication due to cost. These barriers were most pronounced in non-Hispanic Black, Hispanic, and American Indian/Alaska Native nonmetropolitan populations, compared to their White counterparts. In adjusted analysis, micropolitan respondents reported more barriers compared to metropolitan (prevalence rate ratio = 1.06; 95% confidence interval: 1.02-1.10) as did women, racial/ethnic minority populations, and those with less education. CONCLUSIONS: Micropolitan populations experience more barriers to health care, and nonmetropolitan respondents report more cost-related barriers than their metropolitan counterparts, raising concerns on health care disparities and financial burdens for these underserved populations. This underscores the need to mitigate these barriers, particularly among those in micropolitan areas and minorized populations.

Factors Associated with Primary Liver Cancer Survival in a Southern Italian Setting in a Changing Epidemiological Scenario.

A retrospective observational study utilising cancer incidence data from a population-based registry investigated determinants affecting primary liver cancer survival in a southern Italian region with high hepatitis viral infection rates and obesity prevalence. Among 2687 patients diagnosed between 2006 and 2019 (65.3% male), a flexible hazard-based regression model revealed factors influencing 5-year survival rates. High deprivation levels [HR = 1.41 (95%CI = 1.15-1.76); p < 0.001], poor access to care [HR = 1.99 (95%IC = 1.70-2.35); p < 0.0001], age between 65 and 75 [HR = 1.48 (95%IC = 1.09-2.01); p < 0.05] or >75 [HR = 2.21 (95%CI = 1.62-3.01); p < 0.0001] and residing in non-urban areas [HR = 1.35 (95%CI = 1.08-1.69); p < 0.01] were associated with poorer survival estimates. While deprivation appeared to be a risk factor for primary liver cancer patients residing within the urban area, the geographic distance from specialised treatment centres emerged as a potential determinant of lower survival estimates for residents in the non-urban areas. After balancing the groups of easy and poor access to care using a propensity score approach, poor access to care and a lower socioeconomic status resulted in potentially having a negative impact on primary liver cancer survival, particularly among urban residents. We emphasise the need to interoperate cancer registries with other data sources and to deploy innovative digital solutions to improve cancer prevention.

Social and Systemic Barriers to Transition-Related Surgical Procedures for Transgender Americans.

Purpose: Transgender and gender-diverse (TGD) individuals in the United States face disproportionate barriers to health care access. This study compared characteristics of individuals who have and have not undergone gender-affirming surgery with the goal of identifying social and systemic barriers to transition-related surgery. Methods: Data were extracted from the 2015 United States Transgender Survey, a cross-sectional nonprobability sample of nearly 28,000 TGD adults. The primary outcome was having undergone gender-affirming surgery. Multivariable logistic regression models were constructed to determine correlates of receipt of gender-affirming surgery. A subgroup analysis was performed to explore differences by insurance types regarding coverage of surgical procedures and presence of in-network providers. Results: In total, 6009 (21.7%) participants underwent transition-related procedures. Increased odds of undergoing surgery were associated with older age, living in congruent gender, higher education attainment, and greater income. Decreased odds were linked with male sex assignment at birth, first recognizing TGD status at older ages, living in states without trans-protective health laws, no close transgender-knowledgeable health care provider, nonbinary status, and identifying as sexual minority. Residing in states without trans-protective health laws correlated with increased surgery denials over the previous 12-month period. Compared to White TGD individuals, TGD individuals who were Black, Latinx, or Another Race were significantly more likely to encounter health equity-related barriers to surgery. Conclusions: Gender-affirming surgery access is differentially distributed across demographic and modifiable equity-related factors amenable to interventions. Efforts are needed to address the number and geographic distribution of transgender health-competent providers, improve TGD legal protections, and increase access to health insurance for minority TGD individuals, who are disproportionately under/uninsured.

Effect of mental health staffing inputs on initiation of care among recently separated Veterans.

OBJECTIVE: To estimate a causal relationship between mental health staffing and time to initiation of mental health care for new patients. DATA SOURCES AND STUDY SETTING: As the largest integrated health care delivery system in the United States, the Veterans Health Administration (VHA) provides a unique setting for isolating the effects of staffing on initiation of mental health care where demand is high and out-of-pocket costs are not a relevant confounder. We use data from the Department of Defense and VHA to obtain patient and facility characteristics and health care use. STUDY DESIGN: To isolate exogenous variation in mental health staffing, we used an instrumental variables approach-two-stage residual inclusion with a discrete time hazard model. Our outcome is time to initiation of mental health care after separation from active duty (first appointment) and our exposure is mental health staffing (standardized clinic time per 1000 VHA enrollees per pay period). DATA COLLECTION/EXTRACTION METHODS: Our cohort consists of all Veterans separating from active duty between July 2014 and September 2017, who were enrolled in the VHA, and had at least one diagnosis of post-traumatic stress disorder, major depressive disorder, and/or substance use disorder in the year prior to separation from active duty (N = 54,209). PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: An increase of 1 standard deviation in mental health staffing results in a higher likelihood of initiating mental health care (adjusted hazard ratio: 3.17, 95% confidence interval: 2.62, 3.84, p < 0.001). Models stratified by tertile of mental health staffing exhibit decreasing returns to scale. CONCLUSIONS: Increases in mental health staffing led to faster initiation of care and are especially beneficial in facilities where staffing is lower, although initiation of care appears capacity-limited everywhere.

Understanding Women's Transitions from Military to Department of Veterans Affairs Care.

Background: Over the past two decades, increasing numbers of women have served in the military, with women now comprising 17.3% of active-duty personnel and 21.4% of National Guard and reserves. During military service, women often incur painful musculoskeletal (MSK) injuries related to carrying heavy loads and wearing ill-fitting gear. While women may receive initial care for these injuries under the auspices of the Department of Defense (DoD), these injuries often linger and further treatment in required as women transition to Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) care. However, little is known about this transition process, and whether women are given adequate information and support regarding how to access VA care after their military service has ended. Research Design: To better understand these issues, we interviewed 65 women veterans with military service-related MSK injuries about their transition from DoD to VA care. Results: Six major themes emerged from the interviews. Those themes were: (1) Military injuries are often related to ill-fitting gear or carrying heavy loads; (2) Stigma/discrimination related to military injuries; (3) Limited assistance with transition between DoD and VA to manage ongoing injuries and pain; (4) Women have a difficult time managing perceptions and expectations of their weight after military service; (5) Childcare is a substantial burden for veterans in self-care; and (6) veterans desire peer-support services to help them stay healthy. Conclusions: Based on these findings, DoD and VA should continue to work together to develop programs to educate and support women as they transition from military to VA care. Furthermore, VA should consider developing peer support programs for women Veterans who may require additional support to maintain health, especially among Veteran mothers who have complex family responsibilities that may limit their ability to focus on their own health.

Subjective Aging and Basic Activities of Daily Living: Moderation by Health Care Access and Mediation by Health Care Resources.

Subjective aging in older adults is associated with a decline in basic activities of daily living (bADL), although this is less well studied with increasing age cohorts by their healthcare resources (HCR) and healthcare access (HCA) controlling for sociodemographics. We aimed to address this gap in knowledge by analyzing the National Health and Aging Trends round 11 data set on 3303 older adults aged 70 to above 90, comprising 42% male and 58% female by age cohort (middle-old -70-79, n = 1409; older-old -80-89, n = 1432, oldest-old- 90 plus, n = 462). Results of mediation-moderation analysis show the subjective aging whole model comprising subjective cognitive decline, HCR, HCA, and sociodemographic to predict a decline in bADL with increasing age to be higher among the older-old age (80-89) compared to the middle-old age (70-79) or oldest-old (90 years +) cohorts. These findings suggest a "doughnut" effect by which the older-old age cohort of 80-89 may be coping less well with their bADL, while the oldest-old may have adapted to functional loss in their everyday living and/or comprises adults who may have passed a mortality selection despite a more significant burden of comorbidity.

Socioeconomic differences in access to scoliosis care in the pediatric population.

PURPOSE: Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) is a common spinal deformity affecting pediatric patients, with up to 10% requiring surgical intervention. Studies have shown disparities in these patients associated with race, ethnicity, and insurance type, but there is limited information on disparities that exist based on geographical parameters. In this study, we aim to explore the disparities in the care for AIS by looking at differences in the rates of readmission, infection, and revision between patients residing in rural and urban environments. METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study utilizing the Pediatric Health Information System. Pediatric patients that underwent posterior spinal fusion (PSF) for AIS from October 2015 to July 2022 were included. Diagnoses and procedures were identified based on ICD-10 codes and internal tools built into the database. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize the data, including demographics, infection rates, readmission rates, and revision rates. T tests, Chi-squared tests, and logistic regression were used to assess differences between the rural and urban populations. We utilized STATA/SE 15.1 for all data analysis. RESULTS: 15,318 patients were included in the final cohort. Demographics and baseline characteristics were similar between the rural and urban patients, although more rural patients used Medicaid over commercial insurance (41.5% vs. 32.7%, p < 0.01), median household income was lower in rural patients (p < 0.01), and there was a higher proportion of Hispanic patients in the urban patient cohort (13.9% vs. 6.4%, p < 0.01). Complication rates were not significantly different between the urban and rural patient cohorts, although rural patients did have a significantly higher 90-day readmission rate (7.3% vs. 6.1%, p = 0.03) and higher rates of instrumentation removal (7.7% vs. 4.9%, p = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The surgical outcomes between rural and urban pediatric AIS patients undergoing PSF are comparable, although 90-day readmission rates and rates of instrumentation removal were higher in rural patients. Insurance status is likely a significant driver for the differences observed in this study. Future research is needed to better understand the reasons for these differences and to develop strategies to improve outcomes. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Retrospective cohort study, Level III.