[Improving access to kidney transplantation for highly sensitized patients: What place for IL-6 pathway blockade in desensitization protocols?] / Améliorer l'accès à la transplantation rénale des sujets hyperimmunisés : quelle place pour un blocage de la voie de l'IL-6 dans les protocoles de désimmunisation ?

BACKGROUND: Desensitization allows kidney transplantation for HLA highly sensitized subjects. Due to the central role of IL-6 in immunological response, tocilizumab (monoclonal antibody directed against IL-6 receptor) could probably improve desensitization efficacy. METHODS: Pubmed systematic review by using MeSH terms: tocilizumab, clazakizumab, interleukin-6 blockade, kidney transplantation, kidney graft and desensitization. STUDIES: IL-6 plays a role in humoral response (plasmocyte differentiation induced by lymphocyte T, IL-21 secretion) as well as in cellular response (differentiation of LT Th17 rather than T reg). In desensitization field, tocilizumab was first studied as second-line treatment after failing of standard-of-care (apheresis, rituximab ± IgIV). Recent study showed that tocilizumab as a monotherapy attenuated anti-HLA antibodies rates but was not sufficient to allow transplantation. However, lymphocyte immunophenotyping showed that tocilizumab hindered B cells maturation. Thereby, tocilizumab could improve long-term efficacy of desensitization, by limiting the anti-HLA rebound and so avoiding antibody-mediated rejection. This hypothesis is supported by a recent study which used clazakizumab (monoclonal antibody directed against IL-6) in association with standard-of-care. In that study, clazakizumab was continued after kidney transplantation. Results were encouraging because 9/10 patients were transplanted and there was no donor-specific antibody at 6 months post-transplantation. CONCLUSION: IL-6 pathway blockade as a monotherapy fails to desensitize HLA highly sensitized kidney transplant candidates. In association with standard-of-care, it does not seem to significatively improve kidney allograft access (short-term efficacy) vs. standard-of-care only. However, it could improve long-term prognosis of HLA incompatible transplantation by orienting the response towards a tolerogenic profile, by hindering B-cell maturation and, thereby, avoiding DSA rebounds after transplantation. This hypothesis needs to be proven by further studies.

[Definition and standardization of histocompatibility requests depending on patient course and donor type: Guidelines from the Francophone Society of Bone Marrow Transplantation and Cellular Therapy (SFGM-TC) and the Francophone Society of Histocompatibility and Immunogenetics (SFHI)]. / Définition et standardisation des bilans d'histocompatibilité en fonction du parcours du patient et du type de donneur : recommandations de la Société francophone de greffe de moelle et de thérapie cellulaire (SFGM-TC) et de la Société Francophone d'Histocompatibilité et Immunogénétique (SFHI).

Standardization of histocompatibility tests for allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplants, harmonization of information transmitted to clinicians are part of quality improvement and optimization of human and economic resources. New HLA typing technologies provide high-resolution information within a reasonable time frame. Knowledge of high-resolution HLA typing for the patient and their relatives is essential for a better interpretation of compatibilities. HLA-DPB1 typing must be considered in transplant field regardless of the donor type. The benefits of using search and match programs are considerable. It saves time and reduces additional typing costs by providing rapid information about the likelihood to identify a matched unrelated donor. A backup therapy considering alternative cell sources or treatment can therefore be quickly implemented. The importance of knowledge and consideration of patient immunization for donor choice was explored in previous workshops of the SFGM-TC (2018 and 2019). The published recommendations remain applicable. The routine follow-up protocol and in case of desensitization will be detailed here. This harmonization must be accompanied by the standardization of information to be returned to the clinician regarding the donor finding possibilities for the patient. This will guarantee a similar quality level in every center.

What compatibility in 2017 for the haematopoietic stem cell transplantation?

The diversification of potential donors to perform stem cell allografts now enables to propose a compatible graft cell source adapted to the different clinical situations. Transplants with a geno-identical sibling donor, otherwise with the most HLA-compatible unrelated donor, remain the first-line solutions. Alternative transplants allow to graft patients having no donors in international registries, owing to the rarity of their HLA typing. They are carried out with fairly incompatible grafts and are therefore limited by the existence in the recipient of preformed anti-HLA antibodies which predispose to their rejection. The simple prevention of acute Graft-versus-host disease in haplo-identical transplants, as well as the availability of donors, explain why they have very often replaced placental stem cell transplants. These latter remain useful for pediatric patients or in the absence of family donors.

[Cytotoxicity of natural anti-HLA antibodies in Moroccan patients awaiting for kidney transplantation]. / Cytotoxicité des anticorps anti-HLA naturels chez des patients marocains candidats à la greffe rénale.

The presence of anti-HLA antibodies in the serum of a patient result from an immune response produced during an immunizing event as transfusion, pregnancy or graft. These antibodies can be cytotoxic by activating the complement pathway via C1q and may cause organ rejection during the transplant. Some male patients awaiting kidney transplantation are seropositive for anti-HLA antibodies when they have no immunizing antecedent event. These antibodies are qualified as natural antibodies. Our work is to assess the cytotoxicity of natural anti-HLA antibodies in patients followed at the immunology laboratory of the blood transfusion service and hemovigilance (STSH) as part of the kidney transplant. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We evaluated the cytotoxicity of HLA antibodies detected in male Moroccan patients without immunization history using C1qScreen One Lambda reagent for Luminex™. RESULTS: Non-immunized men were positive for HLA antibodies screening in 25.4%. These antibodies are not cytotoxic. CONCLUSION: Our study showed a positivity rate of natural HLA antibody low than the literature (25.4% against 63%). It appears that these natural antibodies are not cytotoxic and their involvement in renal transplant remains to be determined.

[New aspects of HLA compatibility in organ transplantation]. / Nouveaux aspects de la compatibilité HLA en transplantation.

In organ transplantation, HLA compatibility between a donor and a recipient is currently assessed through the comparison of their HLA antigens and the sole count of incompatible HLA antigens. Similarly, antibodies were originally described as antigenic-specific. With solid phase assays detection of anti-HLA antibodies and crystallographic studies, it is now recognized that anti-HLA antibodies are not specific for antigens, but for epitopes, i.e. short polymorphic sequences of amino acids that are more often in positions accessible to allo-antibodies. These epitopes, due to the distribution of HLA molecules polymorphism, may be shared by different HLA antigens. This explains why an immunization towards a given HLA antigen can lead to synthesis of antibodies reactive towards other antigens sharing one or more epitopes. Similarly, structural comparison of the HLA molecules of a recipient and his donor defines the epitope load, i.e. the number of incompatible epitopes. This epitope load is correlated with the risk of developing antibodies specific for the donor after transplantation. New tools, such as the HLAMatchmaker software, allow to determine the epitopic load and to analyze the epitopic specificity of alloantibodies. These tools will possibly lead to rethink the method of graft allocation, or at least to take differently into account HLA compatibility in allocation algorythms.

[Current aspects of acute humoral rejection]. / Aspects actuels des rejets aigus humoraux.

Acute clinical antibody-mediated rejection is currently defined by (1), an acute renal failure occurring during the first months following transplantation, (2), at least a microcirculation inflammation (glomerulitis and peritubular capillaritis) on kidney biopsy and (3), the presence in peripheral blood of donor specific antibodies, mostly anti-human leukocyte antigen (HLA) antibodies. The prognosis of this rejection is scored using the severity of vascular lesions and the positivity of C4d on peritubular capillaries. Recently, a subclinical variety of antibody-mediated rejection was recognized as an entity because, as the clinical rejection, it leads to chronic antibody-mediated rejection, currently the most frequent cause of graft loss. The description of these various aspects of antibody-mediated rejection allowed a better understanding of its pathophyiology that may lead in a near future to a more specific treatment.

[Impact of anti-HLA antibodies on outcomes of allogeneic stem cell transplantation: a report by the SFGM-TC]. / Impact des anticorps anti-HLA sur le devenir de l'allogreffe de cellules souches hématopoïétiques : un rapport par la SFGM-TC.

The role of anti-HLA antibodies in allogeneic stem cell transplantation setting is still unclear. In the attempt to harmonize clinical practices between different French transplantation centers, the French Society of Bone Marrow Transplantation and Cell Therapies (SFGM-TC) set up its fourth annual series of workshops which brought together practitioners from all of its member centers. These workshops took place in September 2013 in Lille. This article offers the recommendations of the group that considered the impact that have anti-HLA antibodies on outcomes in allogeneic stem cell transplantation.