A non-interventional, post-marketing surveillance study evaluating the safety and effectiveness of biosimilar rituximab (CT-P10) during routine clinical practice in the Republic of Korea.

BACKGROUND: CT-P10 was the first licensed rituximab biosimilar. This Korean post-marketing surveillance study evaluated CT-P10 safety and effectiveness in approved indications. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: This prospective, open-label, observational, phase 4 study collected routine clinical practice data across 27 centers in the Republic of Korea. Patients received their first CT-P10 treatment, per prescribing information, for non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL), chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), rheumatoid arthritis (RA), granulomatosis with polyangiitis (GPA), or microscopic polyangiitis (MPA) during the surveillance period (16 November 2016-15 November 2020). Safety (including adverse events [AEs] and adverse drug reactions [ADRs]) and disease-specific clinical response (by best overall response [NHL/CLL], Disease Activity Score in 28-joints [RA], or Birmingham Vasculitis Activity Score for Wegener's Granulomatosis [GPA/MPA]) were assessed for ≤1 year (NHL/CLL) or ≤24 weeks (RA/GPA/MPA). RESULTS: The safety population comprised 677 patients (604 NHL, 16 CLL, 42 RA, 7 GPA, 8 MPA). AEs/ADRs were reported for 68.4%/27.7% (NHL/CLL), 31.0%/14.3% (RA), and 86.7%/13.3% (GPA/MPA) of patients. Serious AEs and unexpected ADRs did not raise new safety signals. Pneumonia was the most frequent serious ADR overall. Positive effectiveness outcomes were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Findings were consistent with the known CT-P10/reference rituximab safety profile, with high effectiveness observed in NHL/CLL and RA.

Real world safety of CT-P10 (anti-CD 20 monoclonal antibodies biosimilar) in rheumatic and autoimmune diseases.

BACKGROUND: Rituximab (RTX), anti-CD 20 monoclonal antibodies, has been approved for many rheumatic and autoimmune diseases, the use of RTX is still limited due to financial constrain. Biosimilar RTX may increase access by offering patients a more affordable option, lead to improved patient outcomes. However, real-world data related to its immediate and short-term safety is scarce. This study aimed to evaluate the real-world immediate and short-term safety profiles of CT-P10, a biosimilar of Rituximab, in patients with rheumatic and autoimmune diseases. METHODS: This prospective study included patients diagnosed with rheumatic or autoimmune diseases, aged ≥ 18 years, who were treated with biosimilar RTX at Siriraj or Ramathibodi Hospital during February 2019 to May 2019. Patients were followed up through 6 months after the infusions. RESULTS: Of the 74 patients, with 124 infusions, 84% were females with mean age (SD) of 49.4 (15.7) years. The most common rheumatic and autoimmune disease included in this study was systemic lupus erythematosus (26%). All immediate adverse events (AEs) (15 out of 124 infusions) were mild requiring only symptomatic and supportive treatment. Short-term AEs included infection (N = 35), hematologic abnormalities (N = 33), chylous ascites (N = 1), and others (N = 10). Two deaths were related to serious bacterial and viral infection. Hematologic AEs comprised anemia (N = 5), neutropenia (N = 10), lymphopenia (N = 15), and thrombocytopenia (N = 3). CONCLUSION: In this real-world study, biosimilar RTX (CT-P10) has favorable immediate and short-term safety profiles. However, further studies with large sample size and long-term follow-up in real-world practice are still required to confirm the result.

A pharmacokinetic evaluation of the rituximab biosimilar CT-P10 in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis.

INTRODUCTION: CT-P10 is the first biosimilar of rituximab (RTX) for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). The application of valuable biosimilar for the treatment of RA may decrease economic burden of society, and disease activity of RA. Thus, it is worthwhile to identify the economic advantage and further requirement for the proper use of CT-P10 in real world. AREAS COVERED: Literature searching was performed to identify suitable references written in English for this review article. Rituximab, biosimilar, CT-P10, and rheumatoid arthritis were used as keywords. Current state of RA treatment, position of RTX in the recommendations for the treatment of RA, current status of RTX biosimilar development were assessed before evaluating CT-P10 itself. Physicochemical property, pharmacokinetic profile through phase I to phase III studies, pharmacodynamics, toxicology data, clinical efficacy, and safety were reviewed. EXPERT OPINION: As the first biosimilar to originator RTX, CT-P10 may be a useful alternative for the treatment of RA in all indications for originator RTX. In addition, more studies are required to identify long-term effectiveness and safety of CT-P10 in real world. It is also important to find out new indications of CT-P10 and effective mechanisms to lessen nocebo effect against biosimilar including CT-P10.

The clinical outcomes of rituximab biosimilar CT-P10 (Truxima®) with CHOP as first-line treatment for patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: real-world experience.

We evaluated real-world effectiveness and safety of CT-P10 (Truxima®) compared with originator rituximab in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) treatment. Before and after the introduction of CT-P10 to our institute (November 2017), 221 newly-diagnosed DLBCL patients received rituximab with standard cyclophosphamide, vincristine, doxorubicin and prednisone. Patients received originator rituximab throughout (n = 95), switched from originator rituximab to CT-P10 (n = 36), or received CT-P10 throughout (n = 90). There were no significant differences between groups in overall response rate (91.6% vs 94.4% vs 96.7%, respectively; p = 0.403) or complete response rate (84.2% vs 77.8% vs 86.7%, respectively; p = 0.467). Kaplan-Meier survival curves also showed no significant differences in progression-free survival and overall survival between groups (log-rank p = 0.794 and p = 0.955, respectively). Safety profiles were comparable between treatment groups. These data support the ability of CT-P10 to successfully replace originator rituximab in DLBCL treatment and, given the lowered financial barrier, to improve the overall prognosis for DLBCL patients.

Rituximab biosimilar CT-P10 for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis.

Introduction: Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic inflammatory disease characterized by long-standing inflammation in multiple joints. Rituximab, a monoclonal antibody, which binds to CD20, is effective in suppressing disease activity and preventing joint damage in RA. CT-P10 was developed as a biosimilar of rituximab and approved for use to treat hematologic malignancies and immune diseases including RA. Area covered: This article describes the need for this biosimilar and summarizes the non-clinical studies verifying the physicochemical and biologic similarities and the clinical studies confirming the clinical similarity of CT-P10 to rituximab in patients with RA. Expert opinion: CT-P10 had been evaluated and proven the efficacy and safety in RA in Phase I and III randomized controlled trial with extension studies including a switching regimen. Therefore, CT-P10 is recommended in the treatment of RA.

Efficacy and safety of switching from rituximab to biosimilar CT-P10 in rheumatoid arthritis: 72-week data from a randomized Phase 3 trial.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of CT-P10, a rituximab biosimilar after a single switch, during a multinational, randomized, double-blind Phase 3 trial involving patients with RA. METHODS: Patients received 48 weeks' treatment with CT-P10 or United States- or European Union-sourced reference rituximab (US-RTX and EU-RTX, respectively). Patients entering the extension period (weeks 48-72) remained on CT-P10 (CT-P10/CT-P10; n = 122) or US-RTX (US-RTX/US-RTX; n = 64), or switched to CT-P10 from US-RTX (US-RTX/CT-P10; n = 62) or EU-RTX (EU-RTX/CT-P10; n = 47) for an additional course. Efficacy endpoints included Disease Activity Score using 28 joints (DAS28), American College of Rheumatology (ACR) response rates, and quality of life-related parameters. Pharmacodynamics, immunogenicity and safety were also assessed. RESULTS: At week 72, similar improvements were observed by disease activity parameters including DAS28 and ACR response rate in the four extension period treatment groups. Quality of life improvements at week 72 vs baseline were similarly shown during the extension period in all groups. Newly developed anti-drug antibodies were detected in two patients following study drug infusion in the extension period. Similar pharmacodynamic and safety profiles were observed across groups. CONCLUSION: Long-term use of CT-P10 up to 72 weeks was effective and well tolerated. Furthermore, switching from reference rituximab to CT-P10 in RA was well tolerated and did not result in any clinically meaningful differences in terms of efficacy, pharmacodynamics, immunogenicity and safety. TRAIL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, http://clinicaltrials.gov, NCT02149121.

Comparison of biosimilar CT-P10 and innovator rituximab in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a randomized controlled Phase 3 trial.

This multinational, randomized, double-blind trial, (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT02149121) was designed to demonstrate equivalence in pharmacokinetics and efficacy between CT-P10 and innovator rituximab (RTX) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Adults with active RA were treated with CT-P10, United States-sourced RTX (US-RTX; Rituxan®), or European Union-sourced RTX (EU-RTX; MabThera®) at weeks 0 and 2. The co-primary pharmacokinetic endpoints were area under the serum concentration-time curve (AUC) from time zero to last measurable concentration (AUC0-last), AUC from time zero to infinity (AUC0-∞), and maximum concentration (Cmax) after two infusions. The primary efficacy endpoint was change from baseline to week 24 in Disease Activity Score using 28 joints-C-reactive protein (DAS28-CRP). Pharmacodynamics, immunogenicity, and safety were also assessed. 372 patients were randomly assigned to CT-P10 (n = 161) or RTX (n = 211 [US-RTX, n = 151; EU-RTX, n = 60]). For the co-primary pharmacokinetic endpoints, 90% confidence intervals (CI) for ratios of geometric means (CT-P10/US-RTX, CT-P10/EU-RTX or EU-RTX/US-RTX) all fell within the equivalence margin of 80-125%. Adjusted least squares (LS) mean (standard error) change from baseline in DAS28-CRP at week 24 was -2.13 (0.175) for CT-P10 and -2.09 (0.176) for RTX. The 95% CI (-0.29, 0.21) of the estimated treatment difference between CT-P10 and RTX (-0.04) was entirely within the efficacy equivalence margin of ±0.5. Pharmacodynamics, immunogenicity, and safety profiles were similar for CT-P10 and RTX. The pharmacokinetics of CT-P10, US-RTX, and EU-RTX were equivalent. CT-P10 and RTX were also equivalent in terms of efficacy and displayed similar pharmacodynamic, immunogenicity, and safety profiles up to week 24.

Analytical similarity assessment of rituximab biosimilar CT-P10 to reference medicinal product.

CT-P10 (Truxima™) was recently approved as the world's first rituximab biosimilar product in the European Union (EU) and South Korea. To demonstrate biosimilarity of CT-P10 with the reference medicinal product (RMP), extensive 3-way similarity assessment has been conducted between CT-P10, EU-Rituximab and US-Rituximab, focusing on the physicochemical and biological quality attributes. A multitude of state-of-the-art analyses revealed that CT-P10 has identical primary and higher order structures compared to the original product. Purity/impurity profiles of CT-P10 measured by the levels of aggregates, fragments, non-glycosylated form and process-related impurities were also found to be comparable with those of RMPs. In terms of the post-translational modification, CT-P10 contains slightly less N-terminal pyro-glutamate variant, which has been known not to affect product efficacy or safety. Oligosaccharide profiling has revealed that, although CT-P10 contains the same conserved glycan species and relative proportion with the RMPs, the content of total afucosylated glycan in CT-P10 was slightly higher than in EU- or US-Rituximab. Nevertheless, the effect of the observed level of afucosylation in CT-P10 drug product on Fc receptor binding affinity or antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity was found to be negligible based on the spiking study with highly afucosylated sample. Arrays of biological assays representative of known and putative mechanisms of action for rituximab have shown that biological activities of CT-P10 are within the quality range of RMPs. Recent results of clinical studies have further confirmed that the CT-P10 exhibits equivalent clinical efficacy and safety profiles compared to EU- and US-Rituximab. The current 3-way similarity assessment together with clinical study results confidently demonstrate that CT-P10 is highly similar with EU- and US-Rituximab in terms of physicochemical properties, biological activities, efficacy, and safety for its final approval as a biosimilar product.

Pharmacokinetics, efficacy and safety of the rituximab biosimilar CT-P10.

INTRODUCTION: Rituximab, an anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody, is a key therapeutic in the treatment of B cell lymphomas and rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Global rates of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL), chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) and RA are increasing, with a concomitant rise in individual and overall treatment costs. As such, biosimilar development may help facilitate greater access to treatment. The rituximab biosimilar CT-P10 (Truxima®) has recently received approval in Europe and South Korea for all indications held by reference rituximab (RTX). Areas covered: Here, the unmet needs and current market in the treatment of NHL, CLL and RA are outlined, followed by a comprehensive examination of the analytical, pre-clinical and clinical data demonstrating the equivalence and similarity of CT-P10 to RTX including with respect to pharmacokinetics, efficacy, safety and immunogenicity. Expert commentary: The rising treatment costs of NHL, CLL and RA pose a challenge to constrained healthcare budgets worldwide. Biosimilars may provide an effective solution to this conundrum. CT-P10 is equivalent to RTX in terms of efficacy and pharmacokinetics, and has a similar safety and immunogenicity profile. Approved in all indications held by RTX, CT-P10 has the potential to reduce treatment costs and thereby increase patient access to rituximab therapy.

Extended stability of the rituximab biosimilar CT-P10 in its opened vials and after dilution and storage in polyolefin bags.

The stability of the rituximab biosimilar CT-P10, in 50mL vials at a concentration of 10mg/mL, and after dilution to final concentrations of 1 and 4mg/mL and storage in polyolefin bags at 4°C and 25°C was studied by several orthogonal and complementary methods. No significant change (as defined by a magnitude greater than the inter-batch variability) was observed, for each of the parameters characterizing physical and chemical stability studied, for the two concentrations and temperatures tested, or for any of the three batches tested. This implies that cold-chain rupture and exposure to room temperature up to 15 days both for vials and diluted bags have no deleterious consequence on the quality of the product. Moreover, this extended stability permits safe in-advance preparation, dose-banding or flat-dose, that to avoid unnecessary delays in the management of the patient, improvement of the pharmacy and nurse workload and money saving by avoiding non justified losses of this expensive drug.

Scientific rationale for extrapolation of biosimilar data across cancer indications: case study of CT-P10.

For a biosimilar to gain regulatory approval, a comprehensive comparability exercise must demonstrate that it is highly similar to its originator biologic, or reference product. Once biosimilarity has been shown, it is possible to approve the biosimilar for additional indications held by the reference product, without clinical trials in these indications. Extrapolation of clinical data is permitted by regulatory agencies as long as it is scientifically justified. CT-P10, a biosimilar of rituximab, was recently approved in Europe for all indications held by its reference product, incorporating both autoimmune diseases and hematological cancers. Here, we review the scientific rationale for extrapolation in biosimilar development using the example of CT-P10 as a case study.

Clinical development of CT-P10 and other biosimilar cancer therapeutics.

Biosimilars are highly similar versions of approved biologic drugs that may confer equivalent efficacy at a reduced cost. Patents for several biological cancer therapeutics are past or approaching expiry, presenting an opportunity to increase affordability and global accessibility of key drugs through the development of biosimilars. To receive approval, a biosimilar must show no clinically meaningful differences from the reference product in terms of efficacy or safety. The first monoclonal antibody biosimilar cancer therapeutic to gain approval was CT-P10, a biosimilar of rituximab. Here, we review the oncology clinical development program for CT-P10, providing insights into the rationale for, and design of, CT-P10 clinical trials in patients with cancer. Trials of biosimilar cancer therapeutics in development are also discussed.

Looking to the future and learning lessons from the recent past: changing stakeholder perceptions of biosimilars in cancer.

As the patents for many biologic anticancer drugs expire, significant growth in the use of biosimilars is predicted, offering an opportunity to help combat the rising costs of treatment and increase patient access to biologic therapy. Attainment of regulatory approval, involving numerous nonclinical and clinical comparative studies versus each reference product, is only one of several barriers to realize the potential gains offered by biosimilars. It is important to understand the current perceptions and informational needs of different stakeholders if biosimilars are to be accepted and widely used in the clinic. We discuss these considerations and refer to recent experiences with CT-P13, a biosimilar of the TNF inhibitor infliximab used to treat rheumatoid arthritis and other inflammatory disorders.

An introduction to biosimilar cancer therapeutics: definitions, rationale for development and regulatory requirements.

Monoclonal antibodies and other biologic drugs play important roles in the treatment of various hematological malignancies and solid tumors. However, such drugs are intrinsically more expensive to develop than small molecules and their clinical benefits are often accompanied by challenges relating to affordability and access. Patent expiry for 'originator' biologics is providing opportunities for a new generation of biosimilar drugs, potentially capable of relieving pressure on healthcare budgets. This article discusses key characteristics of biosimilars, distinguishes them from generics and noncomparable biologics and outlines the robust regulatory requirements that must be followed to establish biosimilarity with a reference product. The path to approval is discussed with reference to the rituximab biosimilar CT-P10, the first licensed monoclonal antibody biosimilar cancer therapeutic.

The Rituximab Biosimilar CT-P10 in Rheumatology and Cancer: A Budget Impact Analysis in 28 European Countries.

INTRODUCTION: New biosimilars of monoclonal antibodies are anticipated to bring significant cost savings and increase access to treatment. The rituximab biosimilar CT-P10 has recently been approved in Europe in all indications held by reference rituximab (RTX), including rheumatoid arthritis, non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, and chronic lymphocytic leukemia. We analyzed the budgetary impact of the introduction of CT-P10 into the European Union (EU) for use in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and cancer diagnoses, using a budget impact analysis model. METHODS: The model used a base case scenario in which the 1-year uptake of CT-P10 was estimated at 30%, and the cost of CT-P10 was assumed to be 70% of the cost of RTX. A second 1-year scenario was also modeled, in which the market share of CT-P10 was assumed to be 50% (scenario 2). Finally, 3-year time horizon outcomes were calculated, in which the market share of CT-P10 was assumed to be 30%, 40%, and 50% in the first, second, and third years, respectively. RESULTS: In the base case scenario, the introduction of CT-P10 was associated with projected savings of €90.04 million in the first year, which would allow 7531 additional patients to access rituximab treatment. This was equivalent to a 6.4% increase in the number of rituximab-treated patients. In scenario 2, budget savings were €150.10 million, with a total of 12,551 additional patients able to access rituximab, equivalent to a 10.7% increase. Over a 3-year time horizon, projected budget savings were approximately €570 million, equating to 47,695 additional patients able to access rituximab. CONCLUSIONS: The model predicted that the introduction of CT-P10 in the EU will be associated with significant budget savings, the reallocation of which will enable many more patients to access rituximab treatment. This is likely to have a significant impact on health gains at patient and societal levels. FUNDING: CELLTRION Healthcare Co., Ltd. sponsored the development and analysis of the budget impact analysis model.