Recent Global Trends and Hotspots in Occipitocervical Fusion: A Bibliometric Analysis and Visualization Study.

Occipitocervical arthrodesis has a variety of indications to treat craniocervical and atlantoaxial pathologies for which a selective cervical fusion would not provide sufficient stability. Over time, the indications for occipitocervical fusions (OCF) have evolved, as new technologies and surgical techniques were developed. In this bibliometric analysis, we aim to explore the progression of OCF literature over time, analyzing the trends in publications and citations, publishing countries and authors, keywords and topics. The Web of Science database was used for data retrieval on July 3rd, 2024, with the search "occipitocervical fusion" OR "occipito-cervical fusion" OR "occipitocervical arthrodesis" OR "occipital cervical fusion" OR "occipital cervical arthrodesis" OR ("OCF" AND "spine surgery"). Excel was used to create the citation analysis and publication trend figures, along with the publishing countries and author analysis. The bibliometric software VosViewer was used to generate the keyword co-occurrence network visualizations. Overall, 762 articles were extracted. The number of pertinent publications and citations increased until 2020 before beginning to decrease. We found that Ehlers Danlos syndrome (EDS) has become a more prevalent topic, as the association between EDS and craniocervical instability has received further scrutiny. "Dysphagia" continues to be a commonly cited topic, while, conversely, rheumatoid arthritis has decreased in publication frequency, possibly related to advances in medical management and surgical techniques. Overall, the United States of America, China, and Japan are the top publishing countries. This analysis of OCF literature provides a helpful overview of emerging trends and clinician concerns, especially as seen through the perspective of time.

Artificial Intelligence Detection of Cervical Spine Fractures Using Convolutional Neural Network Models.

OBJECTIVE: To develop and evaluate a technique using convolutional neural networks (CNNs) for the computer-assisted diagnosis of cervical spine fractures from radiographic x-ray images. By leveraging deep learning techniques, the study might potentially lead to improved patient outcomes and clinical decision-making. METHODS: This study obtained 500 lateral radiographic cervical spine x-ray images from standard open-source dataset repositories to develop a classification model using CNNs. All the images contained diagnostic information, including normal cervical radiographic images (n=250) and fracture images of the cervical spine fracture (n=250). The model would classify whether the patient had a cervical spine fracture or not. Seventy percent of the images were training data sets used for model training, and 30% were for testing. Konstanz Information Miner (KNIME)'s graphic user interface-based programming enabled class label annotation, data preprocessing, CNNs model training, and performance evaluation. RESULTS: The performance evaluation of a model for detecting cervical spine fractures presents compelling results across various metrics. This model exhibits high sensitivity (recall) values of 0.886 for fractures and 0.957 for normal cases, indicating its proficiency in identifying true positives. Precision values of 0.954 for fractures and 0.893 for normal cases highlight the model's ability to minimize false positives. With specificity values of 0.957 for fractures and 0.886 for normal cases, the model effectively identifies true negatives. The overall accuracy of 92.14% highlights its reliability in correctly classifying cases by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve. CONCLUSION: We successfully used deep learning models for computer-assisted diagnosis of cervical spine fractures from radiographic x-ray images. This approach can assist the radiologist in screening, detecting, and diagnosing cervical spine fractures.

The Clinical Outcomes of Cervical Spine Chordoma: A Nationwide Multicenter Retrospective Study.

OBJECTIVE: Chordoma, a rare malignant tumor originating from embryonal notochord remnants, exhibits high resistance to conventional treatments, making surgical resection imperative. However, the factors influencing prognosis specifically for cervical spine chordoma have not been clearly identified. We investigate the prognosis of cervical spine chordoma with factors influential in a nationwide multicenter retrospective study. METHODS: This study included all patients diagnosed with cervical spine chordoma at 7 tertiary referral centers from January 1998 to March 2023, excluding those with clivus and thoracic spine chordomas extending into the cervical spine. Local recurrence (LR) was identified through follow-up magnetic resonance imaging, either as reappearance in completely resected tumors or regrowth in residual tumors. The study assessed LR and overall survival, analyzing factors influencing LR and death. RESULTS: Forty-five patients with cervical spine chordoma had a mean age of 46.4 years. Over a median follow-up of 52 months, LR and distant metastasis were observed in 21 (46.7%) and 4 patients (8.9%), respectively, and 16 patients (36%) were confirmed dead. The 5-year and 10-year cumulative LR rates were 51.3% and 60%, respectively, while the 5-year and 10-year survival rates were 82% and 53%. Age was the only significant factor affecting mortality (hazard ratio, 1.04; 95% confidence interval, 1.04-1.07; p=0.015). Notably, the degree of resection and adjuvant therapy did not statistically significantly impact local tumor control and mortality. CONCLUSION: This study, the largest multicenter retrospective analysis of cervical spine chordoma in Korea, identified age as the only factor significantly affecting patient survival.

Odontoid fractures in the pediatric population: a systematic review and management algorithm.

Purpose: The management of odontoid fractures in adult patients has been widely described. However, there is sparse literature about this injury in the pediatric population. This study aimed to review published literature regarding the management and outcomes of pediatric odontoid fractures to develop a stepwise treatment algorithm. Methods: A literature review was conducted using PRISMA guidelines on PubMed to identify studies between 1960 and 2023 that reported on the management and outcomes of odontoid fracture in pediatric patients. Studies were included if they were published in English and if their sample included at least four patients aged 0-18, minimum follow-up of 6 weeks, and outcomes for each patient clearly differentiated. Results: In total, 15 studies including 125 pediatric patients with odontoid fractures were included. Treatment options varied from non-operative management with immobilization in rigid collars, halo vests, cervicothoracic orthosis, or soft collars to surgical management with fixation and/or arthrodesis. There were 73 patients initially treated nonoperatively, 47 initially treated surgically, 2 who healed with observation alone, and 3 who died acutely of concomitant injuries. The nonunion rate for nonoperative management was 5.5%. Surgery was successful, demonstrating bony union at final follow-up, in 94.6% of cases treated via a posterior approach and 85.7% of cases treated with an anterior approach. Conclusions: Odontoid fractures must be considered in pediatric patients with cervical spine trauma. This is the largest literature review of pediatric odontoid fractures. Various management strategies exist and can be considered. The proposed algorithm offers an evidence-based framework for the management of pediatric odontoid fractures.

Chalk-Stick Fracture in Ankylosing Spondylitis: A Case Report of Cervical Spine Injury Following Minor Trauma.

We describe the case of a 74-year-old male with ankylosing spondylitis (AS) who presented to the Emergency Department for evaluation of acutely worsened left-sided weakness following a fall from standing. Computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of his cervical spine revealed a chalk-stick fracture of C5-C7, which required surgical intervention. Chalk-stick fractures are rare, typically occurring in patients with AS, and often occurring from low-energy mechanisms. In the acute setting, providers should maintain a low threshold for obtaining CT or MRI imaging to evaluate spinal injury in patients with AS.

Baseline Neck Disability Index and Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Physical Function Predict Postoperative Return to Normal in Cervical Spine Surgery.

BACKGROUND: Recent studies assessing the importance of various preoperative factors on postoperative outcomes following spine surgery have uncovered several important variables that influence subjective and objective outcomes following cervical spine surgery, but it is still unclear which patients are most likely to benefit from operative management. PURPOSE: The objective of this study was to assess whether preoperative patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) can be used to predict which patients achieve "normal" levels of pain and function after surgery. STUDY DESIGN: This was a prospective cohort study. PATIENT SAMPLE: This study included all adult patients undergoing cervical spine surgery by 1 of 7 senior spine surgeons at our institution between 2016 and 2018. Of the 164 patients who were eligible for 6-month follow-up at the time that study data were collected, 139 had available follow-up data and were included in our analysis. OUTCOMES MEASURES: Patients completed the Neck Disability Index (NDI) as well as the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Physical Function (PF) and Pain Interference computer adaptive tests preoperatively and at 6 months postoperatively. METHODS: Patients who achieved postoperative patient-acceptable symptom state (PASS) for NDI (≤17) and the normative mean (50) for PROMIS were identified. The relationship between preoperative PROMs and the probability of achieving PASS and the normative mean was assessed. RESULTS: One hundred thirty-nine patients met inclusion criteria with diagnoses of myelopathy (n = 36), radiculopathy (n = 48), and myeloradiculopathy (n = 49). For NDI, a 1-point worsening in the preoperative score resulted in an OR of achieving PASS of 0.96 (P < 0.001) in the overall population. This association held true for patients with radiculopathy (OR 0.96; P = 0.022) but not myelopathy (OR 0.98; P = 0.35). For PROMIS PF, a 1-point improvement in the preoperative score resulted in an OR of achieving the normative mean of 1.10 (P < 0.001). This association held true for patients with radiculopathy (OR 1.14; P = 0.033) but did not reach statistical significance for patients with myelopathy (OR 1.03; P = 0.515). CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative PROMs can predict postoperative benefit for patients undergoing cervical spine surgery, with worse baseline function associated with a lower likelihood of attaining PASS for NDI and the normative mean for PROMIS PF, especially for patients with radiculopathy. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Baseline symptoms and function, including myelopathy or radiculopathy-dominant symptoms and preoperative PROMs, may predict postoperative outcomes.

Post-operative Unilateral Visual Loss and Ophthalmoplegia following Cervical Spine Surgery in Prone Position: A Case Report.

ABSTRACT: Visual loss following a spine surgery in a prone position is a disastrous and irreversible complication. Moreover, the recommended treatment for such visual loss is lacking and the outcome is not so satisfactory. A 38-year-old gentleman developed profound right sided visual loss after an uneventful cervical spine surgery in a prone position that lasted approximately two and half hours. Immediate ophthalmic consultation was done and the case was diagnosed as right-sided central retinal artery occlusion. Despite the initiation of vasodilatation, anticoagulation, and adequate fluid infusion, satisfactory improvement was not achieved. Extensive review of pertinent literature highlighted limited efficacy of treatments for postoperative visual loss after prone spinal surgery, further emphasizing the importance of preventive measures as the cornerstone in such procedures.

Evaluation of Upper Airway Growth Patterns With Cephalometric Analysis Based on Cervical Vertebral Maturation in the Japanese: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Objective This study aims to establish standard values for the upper airway cross-sectional area and evaluate growth patterns using the cervical vertebral maturation stage (CVMS) in a Japanese population. Methods A cross-sectional sample of 400 patients, aged 6-20 years, was selected randomly from the Orthodontic Clinic at Tokyo Medical and Dental University (TMDU) dental hospital. Cervical vertebral maturation stages (CVMS I-V) guided the classification of participants into five equal groups. Lateral cephalometric radiographs taken prior to orthodontic treatment were used to measure the upper airway's cross-sectional area. The growth spurt and sex differences in growth patterns were assessed through these measurements. Results Standard values for the upper airway dimensions at each CVMS stage were established. Significant growth spurts were noted between CVMS II-III and CVMS III-IV in males and at CVMS II-III in females. The weighted kappa coefficient (κ) demonstrated almost perfect intra- and inter-evaluator agreement, confirming the reliability of CVMS in growth assessment. Conclusion CVMS provides a reliable framework for assessing growth patterns of the upper airway, with distinct variations between sexes noted. These findings support the utility of CVMS in clinical growth evaluation and orthodontic treatment planning.

Giant cell tumor of the cervical spine: A very uncommon cause for cervical spine compression.

Giant cell tumors (GCTs) are rare neoplasms, primarily found in long bones, typically affecting the epiphysis of the distal femur, proximal tibia, and distal radius. However, their occurrence in the cervical spine is exceedingly rare. Here, we present a case report of a 21-year-old female patient who presented with progressive neck pain, radiating numbness, and right hemiparesis. Radiographic imaging revealed a lytic lesion in the C3 vertebral body, further characterized by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and computed tomography (CT) scans. The patient underwent surgery for stabilization of the cervico-occipital hinge, decompression, and biopsy. Histopathological examination confirmed the diagnosis of a giant cell tumor. Postoperatively, the patient showed improvement in motor impairment, cervical pain, and numbness. She was proposed for adjuvant treatment based on Denosumab. However, she returned 1 month after surgery with worsened motor deficit, developing tetraparesis. Control MRI revealed a tumor flare-up. The decision was made not to reoperate on the patient and to accelerate the administration of Denosumab. Meanwhile, she experienced a pulmonary embolism leading to her demise. This case underscores the importance of considering giant cell tumors in the differential diagnosis of cervical spine lesions and emphasizes the successful and prompt management through a multidisciplinary approach involving surgical intervention and adjuvant therapy.

Mortality risk factors for adult trauma patients treated with halo brace for cervical spine fracture.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Halo braces treat upper cervical spine fractures and serve as the most rigid form of external immobilization. Recently, halo braces have lost favor due to known complications and advances in surgical stabilization. This study aims to determine the contemporary incidence for use of halo braces and identify risk factors associated with mortality in trauma patients undergoing halo brace for cervical spine fractures. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The 2017-2019 Trauma Quality Improvement Program Database was queried for patients ≥18 years-old with a cervical spine fracture undergoing halo brace. Patients sustaining penetrating trauma and severe torso injuries (abbreviated injury scale >3 for the abdomen or thorax) were excluded. Bivariate and multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed. RESULTS: From 144,434 patients with a cervical spine fracture, 272 (0.2%) underwent halo brace and 14 (5%) of these died. Those who died were older (73.5 vs. 53 years-old, p = 0.011) and had higher rates of hypertension (78.6% vs 33.1%, p < 0.001) and chronic kidney disease (14.3% vs. 1.2%, p < 0.001). Glasgow Coma Scale ≤8 (46.2% vs. 8.2%, p < 0.001) and cervical spinal cord injury (71.4% vs. 21.3%, p < 0.001) were more common in patients who died. In addition, those who died more often sustained respiratory complications (7.1% vs. 0.4%, p = 0.004) and sepsis (7.1% vs. 0.4%, p = 0.004). On multivariable logistic regression analysis, only Glasgow Coma Scale ≤8 (OR 19.77, 3.04-128.45, p = 0.002) was associated with increased mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Only 5% of cervical spine fracture patients undergoing halo brace died. Respiratory complications and sepsis were more common in those who died. On multivariable analysis only Glasgow Coma Scale ≤8 remained an independent associated risk factor for mortality.

Osteoporosis is Not Associated with Reoperation or Pseudarthrosis after Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion Through Four-Years' Follow-Up: A Retrospective Cohort Study of US Academic Health Centers.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Osteoporosis has been proposed as a risk factor for reoperation after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF), yet this potential association has been understudied, with conflicting results to date. PURPOSE: This study examines the hypothesis that adults with osteoporosis would have an increased risk of reoperation after ACDF compared to matched adults without osteoporosis. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: Retrospective cohort study. PATIENT SAMPLE: Two matched cohorts (mean age: 62 years; 75% female), each with 1,019 patients, who underwent primary ACDF. Cohorts were determined by the presence or absence of a diagnosis of osteoporosis. OUTCOME MEASURES: Incidence of reoperation occurring over four years postoperatively, with our primary outcome being the risk ratio (RR) of reoperation with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Secondary outcomes included risk and mean count of oral opioid prescriptions and risk of pseudoarthrosis. METHODS: We utilized the TriNetX network to identify adults undergoing their first ACDF from 2004-2020, excluding those with serious pathology, and divided patients into two cohorts: osteoporosis and non-osteoporosis. Patients were propensity matched according to key risk factors for reoperation. RESULTS: Patients with osteoporosis had no statistically significant or meaningful difference in risk of reoperation compared to non-osteoporotic patients over four-years' follow-up [95% CI] (17.3% versus 16.5%; RR: 1.05 [0.86, 1.27]; p=0.6361). Similarly, there were no significant differences in the risk of pseudoarthrosis (26.5% versus 29.1%; RR: 0.91 [0.79, 1.05]; p=0.1820), oral opioid prescription (75.0% versus 76.0%; RR: 0.99 [0.94, 1.04]; p=0.6067), or mean oral opioid prescription count (11.5 vs. 11.8; p=0.7040). CONCLUSION: Compared to matched non-osteoporosis controls, osteoporosis was not associated with a statistically significant or clinically meaningful increase in risk of reoperation in adults over four years after ACDF. Furthermore, osteoporosis was not associated with a significant or meaningful risk of pseudoarthrosis or oral opioid prescription after ACDF, although more research is needed for corroboration. Additional research is needed to clarify whether those with osteoporosis have meaningful differences in pain and function compared to those without osteoporosis following ACDF.

Early Occipitocervical Fusion Surgery in a Rare Clinical Encounter of Non-traumatic Atlantooccipital Subluxation (AOS) in Down Syndrome (Trisomy 21).

Subluxation of the atlantooccipital joint in patients with underlying Down syndrome is an extremely rare orthopedic condition. The condition can pose life-threatening risks if not promptly diagnosed and treated in the early stage. Yet, there have been documented cases of survival following atlantooccipital subluxation or dislocation. Atlantooccipital subluxation (AOS) is usually identified during screening in children with Down syndrome for atlantoaxial subluxation (AAS). Therefore, careful evaluation of the atlantooccipital joint from radiographs is also essential. It is crucial to emphasize the clinical significance of AOS. Here the authors present the case of a fifteen-year-old girl with underlying Down syndrome (trisomy 21) who survived a sudden onset of non-traumatic atlantooccipital subluxation with spinal cord compression. There are only a few cases were reported in patients with Down syndrome (trisomy 21) and only two cases with surgically treated atlantooccipital (C0C1) subluxation have been reported. This case is of particular interest as it represents the first reported case of atlantooccipital (C0C1) subluxation with spinal cord compression in Down syndrome that underwent occipitocervical fusion surgery during the acute presentation, resulting in significant neurological recovery. Her neurology symptoms and physical functions showed remarkable improvement post-surgery, and she is doing well at the one-year follow-up in the clinic. Early surgery during acute presentation in this case resulted in good surgical outcomes and improved patient quality of life.

Transcranial Corticospinal Motor-Evoked Potentials in Cases of Ventral and Ventrolateral Intradural Extramedullary Cervical Spinal Cord Tumors.

Background and Objectives: We studied the clinical significance of an amplitude decrement and disappearance alarm criteria in transcranial motor-evoked potential (MEP) monitoring during surgeries on extramedullary tumors at the cervical spine with reference to postoperative morbidity. Material and Methods: We diagnosed and surgically treated fourteen patients with intradural extramedullary ventral or ventrolateral lesions to the cervical spinal cord in the Clinic of Neurosurgery at the University Hospital St Ivan Rilski from January 2018 to July 2022. Eight cases were diagnosed with schwannoma, and the remaining six had meningiomas. The follow-up period for neurological assessment was six months. Results: A decrease in the intraoperative transcranial MEPs of 50% or more compared to baseline in two cases (14.3%) resulted in an immediate postoperative motor deficit. One patient demonstrated full neurological recovery within six months, while the other exhibited only partial improvement. In six cases (42.9%) with preoperative motor deficits, tumor resection and decompression of the cervical spinal cord led directly to an increment of the transcranial MEPs by more than 20%. Postoperatively and at the 6-month follow-up, these patients showed recovery from the preoperative deficits. In the remaining cases, MEPs were stable during surgery with no clinical deterioration of the motor function. Conclusions: The decremented MEP criteria corresponded to postoperative motor deficit, whereas the improvement of the same parameters after decompression implied future recovery of preoperative motor deficits. The combination of different MEP criteria is likely to be helpful when tailored to a specific case of ventral or ventrolateral extramedullary lesions in the cervical spine.

Cervical spine spondylodiscitis due to neglected esophageal perforation after a dilation procedure 30 years after a laringectomy and radiotherapy. Report of a case and review of literature.

Current treatment of cervical spine spondylodiscitis generally involves a radical surgical debridement and stable reconstruction together with antibiotic therapy until complete healing. But this classical approach could be difficult for patients who have been treated previously for an esophageal carcinoma and received radiotherapy. We present a case of a 75-year-old male who underwent an esophageal dilation procedure and developed afterward a spondylodiscitis with epidural abscess due to a neglected esophageal perforation. Blood cultures were positive for Peptostreptococcus. Cervical spondylodiscitis and epidural abscess are extremely rare complications of esophageal dilations. Successful treatment without debridement was achieved by performing a posterior fixation without decompression associated with antibiotic therapy for 8 weeks. The present case highlights that spondylodiscitis and epidural abscess may be treated in selected cases where the anterior neck is unapproachable and with a recognized pathogen by a posterior approach fixation without debridement, in association to specific antibiotic therapy.

Computed Tomographic Scan for Head Injury Patients: Any Justification for Adapting Routine Cranio-Cervical Examination Irrespective of Clinical Severity?

Background and Objective: This study aimed to assess the prevalence of concomitant cervical spine and head injury at our University Teaching Hospital in Nigeria and attempted to justify examining patients' head and cervical spine using computed tomography (CT) scan at presentation irrespective of the head injury severity by clinical assessment using Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS). Patients and Methods: All eligible patients, 1-80 years of age who presented with head injuries in the accident and emergency (A&E) unit during the study period, were included if they satisfied the inclusion criteria. Post-resuscitation GCS was assessed clinically, and head and cervical spine injury (CSI) were observed radiologically on cranio-cervical CT scan for all patients. The presence of cervical spine fractures, subluxation or dislocation was considered a confirmation of CSI. Results: There were 143 patients with head injuries studied; 90.2% of them were males. The mean age of the patients was 28.87 ± 15.93 years. The most common cause of injury was road traffic accidents in 110 (76.90%). The prevalence of CSI was 11.2%. Majority of the patients with CSI in this study (56.25%) had a mild head injury, 25% had a moderate head injury, and 18.75% had a severe head injury. The lower cervical spine was the most frequently injured segment in this study, involving 10 patients. Multi-level cervical vertebral body fractures of C3 to C6 were the most common form of CSI in this segment. Conclusion: The prevalence of concomitant cervical spine and head injury was significant in this study. This was confirmed among study subjects with a clinical diagnosis of mild-to-moderate head injury as compared with moderate-to-severe head injury. Therefore, all patients who sustained a head injury irrespective of severity are required to have a complete and rapid evaluation of the cervical spine.

Evaluating laminar and lateral mass screw techniques in cervical injury management: A case series.

INTRODUCTION AND IMPORTANCE: The cervical spine is a dynamic structure that protects adjacent nervous innervation and maintains the range of motion (ROM) of the head and neck. Fractures in this area can lead to high mortality and morbidity, with bone fractures accounting for 56 % of cervical spinal cord injuries. This case series presents a series of cervical pathologies treated with posterior decompression and stabilization using laminar and lateral mass screw fixation. METHODS: This research is a case series of four patients treated with laminar and lateral mass screw technique. All patients received a surgical procedure, including posterior compression and stabilization, which included the use of a laminar and lateral mass screw. We followed the patient for 12 months. During follow up, outcome measures consisting of VAS, range of motion, neurological status, ODI Score, SF-12 Score and any complications related to the surgical procedure was recorded and calculated every 3 months. OUTCOMES: This series examines four distinct cases. The initial case pertained to a female patient, aged 72, who exhibited tetraparesis resulting from a burst fracture occurring in the C3-C5 vertebrae. The underlying etiology of this pathology is considered to be mineral bone disease associated with thyroid hormone imbalance due to thyroid cancer. The second instance was a 14-year-old child experiencing neck pain due to spondylitis tuberculosis in the C1-C2 region, accompanied by a retropharyngeal abscess and occipitocervical dissociation (OCD) with basilar invagination. The third example pertained to a patient who is 9 years old and presented with weakness in all extremities due to C1 fracture-dislocation. The fourth case was a 14-year-old patient who experienced a fall from a bunk bed. This patient was diagnosed with Traumatic Atlantoaxial dislocation with odontoid fracture Type II. All patients showed improved cervical curvature and range of motion with the advantages of reduction of intraoperative haemorrhage, as well as a decrease in postoperative rehabilitation duration. Overall, the data shows a general trend of improvement in VAS and ODI scores over time, with SF-12 scores stabilizing or slightly decreasing by 12 months post-operation. CONCLUSION: The use of a lateral mass screw for subaxial cervical injuries can be employed to manage cervical spine pathologies like fractures and infections, including spondylitis TB. However, more research is required to evaluate the long-term complications and success rates of this technique.

The footprint mismatch of cervical disc arthroplasty comes from degenerative factor besides ethnic factor.

A mismatch in footprints of cervical total disc arthroplasty (CTDA) implants occasionally occurred in Asian population and it had been attributed solely to ethnic factor. Yet, cervical degeneration process may play a role. Our purpose was to compare the cervical vertebra morphometric data with and without degeneration. The study included patients with CT scans of cervical spine from our hospital between January, 2019, and September, 2021. The total cervical degenerative index (TCDI) of each patient were collected by adding CDI score for 5 disc-levels. Patients were categorized into normal (TCDI 0-5) and degeneration groups (TCDI 6-60). Various measurements of the C3-C7 vertebral body and endplate were taken. Forty-nine patients in the normal group and 55 in the degeneration group were included. No significant difference was noted in gender, BH, BW, or BMI except age and TCDI (p < .001). During degeneration, disproportional endplate size changes were observed, with an increment ratio of 12-20% in the anteroposterior and 5-17% in the mediolateral plane throughout C3-C7, while vertebral body height remained constant. In conclusion, degeneration process, besides ethnic factor, causes the endplate size and shape mismatch. This information can help spine surgeon choose appropriate implants in CTDA surgery.

Anatomical Relationships of Internal Carotid Artery with Posterior Pharyngeal Wall and Upper Cervical Spine: Analysis of 238 Computed Tomography Angiograms.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate internal carotid artery's (ICA) anatomical relationships with atlantoaxial joints and posterior pharyngeal wall and to illustrate ICA injury risk during transoral procedures to the upper cervical spine. METHODS: Cervical spine computed tomography angiography of 238 patients was retrospectively evaluated. Each ICA was classified into 1 of 3 zones: areas medial (Zone 1), anterior (Zone 2), or lateral (Zone 3) to the atlantoaxial joint. For an ICA in Zone 1, the shortest distances to the posterior pharyngeal wall and midsagittal plane were measured. For an ICA in Zone 2, the closest distances to the midsagittal plane and anterior cortex of the C1-2 complex were measured. RESULTS: Fifteen ICAs in Zone 1 were found in 12 (5%) patients, with 3 female patients having bilateral ICAs medial to the atlantoaxial joint. The incidence of ICA in Zone 1 was higher in females than in males. In cases of ICAs in Zone 2, the ICAs were close to the anterior cortex of the C1-2 complex, with the shortest distance being 2.6 ± 1.5 mm. A total of 39.9% of patients had bilateral ICAs in Zone 3. CONCLUSIONS: Transoral surgeries in the upper cervical spine carry potential ICA injury risk. They should be carefully deliberated in patients whose ICAs are in Zone 1. In cases of ICAs in Zone 2, meticulous subperiosteal stripping and gentle traction should be performed on the posterior pharyngeal wall. Preoperative identification of the course of ICAs is mandatory in patients undergoing transoral surgeries in the upper cervical spine.

[Transport of severely injured trauma patients in an ambulance with and without a rigid neck orthosis: comparative biomechanical measurements]. / Transport von schwer verletzten Traumapatienten im Rettungswagen mit und ohne starre Halsorthese: vergleichende biomechanische Messungen.

BACKGROUND: The actual significance of prehospital immobilization of the cervical spine in severely injured trauma patients remains unclear. In view of possible negative implications, such as an increase in intracranial pressure due to the application of a rigid cervical spine orthosis, the long-term use must be critically questioned. Further studies are required to justify the long-term use of a rigid cervical spine orthosis in the prehospital setting. OBJECTIVE: Comparative measurements of the mobility of the cervical spine during immobilization using a vacuum mattress with or without the additional application of a rigid cervical spine orthosis after positioning on the stretcher were carried out. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Biomechanical measurements of the movement of the cervical spine were carried out by attaching inertial measurement units to a test person during the loading and unloading process in a modern ambulance and during the journey along a predefined parkour. The test person on whom the measurements were carried out was immobilized on a vacuum mattress with the option of lateral fixation of the head and chin and forehead strap on an electrohydraulic stretcher. The complete standard monitoring was set up to simulate as realistic a transport of a severely injured patient as possible. A total of 30 test runs were realized. In one half of the tests, the cervical spine was additionally immobilized using a rigid orthosis and in the other half a cervical spine orthosis was not used. For each of the 30 tests, the angles, axial rotation, lateral bending and flexion/extension as well as the first and second derivatives were considered for loading, transport and unloading and the parameters mean deviation from the zero position, size of the swept angle range and maximum were calculated for each test run. RESULTS: Statistically significant differences were only found for some biomechanical parameters in the sagittal plane (flexion and extension). No significant differences were found for the measured parameters in the other directions of movement (axial rotation, lateral flexion). In general, only very small angular deflections were measured both in the tests with the cervical spine orthosis and without the cervical spine orthosis (on average in the range of 1-2° for axial rotation and flexion/extension and up to 3° for lateral flexion). CONCLUSION: If immobilization is carried out correctly using a vacuum mattress with the option of lateral stabilization of the head and chin and a forehead strap on an electrohydraulic stretcher with a loading system, there are no relevant advantages with respect to the restriction of movement of the cervical spine by the additional use of a rigid cervical spine orthosis for the loading and unloading process or during the transport in a modern ambulance. It could therefore be advantageous to remove the rigid cervical spine orthosis initially applied for the rescue of the patient at the scene after the patient has been positioned on the vacuum mattress and stretcher to avoid potential negative effects of the rigid cervical spine orthosis for the period of transportation to the hospital.

Structural Allograft versus Polyetheretherketone Cage in Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: A Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cages and structural allografts (SAs) are commonly used in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF), yet their postoperative results remain uncertain. This meta-analysis was conducted to determine whether there were any differences in outcomes between patients who received these two grafts in ACDF. METHODS: We comprehensively searched electronic databases up to August 2023. Observational studies or randomized controlled trials reported postoperative outcomes, including fusion, subsidence, reoperation rates, and patient-reported outcomes through the Neck Disability Index, the visual analog scale for neck and arm pain, and the Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA)/modified JOA score following primary ACDF using SA or PEEK cage. The results are presented in odds ratios (ORs) or mean differences with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs). RESULTS: Eleven studies were included, with 1213 patients (788 receiving SAs and 425 receiving PEEK cages). Patients having SA had significantly higher fusion (OR: 1.84; 95% CI: 1.27-2.67; P = 0.001) and lower subsidence (OR: 0.50; 95% CI: 0.30-0.86; P = 0.01) rates when compared with the PEEK cage. There was no difference in revision rate between SA or PEEK cage (P = 0.88). Two grafts demonstrated similar clinical improvements in Neck Disability Index (P = 0.31), visual analog scale for the neck (P = 0.77) and arm pain (P = 0.22), and JOA/modified JOA score (P = 0.99). CONCLUSIONS: SA demonstrates better fusion and lower subsidence rates than the PEEK cage in ACDF. Nevertheless, SAs and PEEK cages resulted in equally successful postoperative clinical performances.