Short-Term Clinical Results of Minimally Invasive Direct Coronary Artery Bypass (MIDCAB) Procedure.

Objectives: Minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass (MIDCAB) is an alternative for revascularisation of the isolated left anterior descending (LAD) artery or as a multi-vessel (MV) procedure for the diagonal branch (RD) or the left circumflex coronary artery (LCX) region. Methods: From 2021 to 2022, 91 patients underwent MIDCAB or multi-vessel MIDCAB procedures in our heart center. The left internal mammary artery (LIMA) was anastomosed to the left anterior descending artery via the left minithoracotomy approach in all patients. Results: Of the patients, a total of 86.8% were male. Eighty percent of the patients had two- or three-vessel coronary artery disease. The mean age was 65.1 ± 10.1 years. The mean operation time was 2.6 ± 0.8 h. The 30-day mortality was 0. The mean required packed red blood cells (pRBC) was 0.4 ± 1.2 unit. The mean intensive care unit stay (ICU) was 1.5 ± 1.6 days. The mean follow-up time was 1.5 ± 0.5 years. One patient received percutaneous coronary intervention due to de novo stenosis of the RCA. Late mortality was 2.2%. The Kaplan-Meier survival rate was 98.8% at 1 and 2 years. Conclusions: The postoperative complication rate of our MIDCAB cohort is low, and the short-term survival is favorable. Our postoperative and short-term clinical results demonstrate that this procedure is safe and feasible.

The Usefulness of Endoscopic Harvesting of the Latissimus Dorsi Flap for Breast Reconstruction Using a Single-Port and CO2 Gas Insufflation Technique.

BACKGROUND: In the recent trend toward less aggressive approaches to breast reconstruction, minimally invasive harvesting of the latissimus dorsi (LD) flaps has long been a desirable goal. Endoscopically-assisted LD flap harvesting was reported as a method for minimizing scar formation and reducing donor-site morbidity. This study investigates the surgical outcomes of endoscopically-assisted immediate breast reconstruction with LD muscle flaps. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This prospective study included 21 patients who underwent endoscopically-assisted breast reconstruction with LD muscle flap and 20 patients who underwent breast reconstruction with conventional harvesting LD musculocutaneous flap. In patients with nonexcised skin or possible primary closure, the reconstruction was performed with endoscopically-assisted LD muscle flaps using the single-port and CO2 gas insufflation technique. The patients were classified into groups according to the location of the defect and mastectomy type. Moreover, patient satisfaction was investigated 6 months after surgery. RESULTS: In patients who underwent endoscopically-assisted breast reconstruction with LD muscle flaps, the scar of the donor-site was vertical, and the size was 4 cm to be obscured when lowering the arms. In comparison with patients who underwent breast reconstruction with conventional LD flaps, those who underwent endoscopically-assisted breast reconstruction with LD muscle flaps showed shorter hospital stay and no difference in patient satisfaction. CONCLUSION: Endoscopically-assisted breast reconstruction with LD flaps showed no difference in patient satisfaction with good esthetic results compared with conventional LD flaps. The endoscopic LD muscle flap harvest technique using a single-port and CO2 insufflation technique can be very useful in breast reconstruction that does not require a skin paddle. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

In patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting, is endoscopic harvesting superior to open radial artery harvesting?

A best evidence topic in cardiac surgery was written according to a structured protocol. The question addressed was 'In patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting, is endoscopic radial artery harvesting (ERAH) superior to open radial artery harvesting in terms of postoperative complications, mortality, graft quality and patency rates?'. Altogether 130 papers were found using the reported search, of which 5 represented the best evidence to answer the clinical question. Two studies were meta-analyses and 3 were randomized trials. The authors, journal, date and country of publication, patient group studied, study type, relevant outcomes and results of these papers are tabulated. In terms of graft quality, 2 randomized studies showed preserved endothelial integrity and vasoreactivity with ERAH, whereas 1 randomized study found superior endothelial function with open radial artery harvesting. Importantly, 3 studies showed graft patency was not compromised with ERAH. One meta-analysis reported no differences in graft patency between groups at 1 year [odds ratio (OR) 1.24] and up to 3-5-years follow-up (OR 1.81), as well as similar perioperative myocardial infarction rates (OR 0.80). Two meta-analyses found similar mortality in the perioperative period (OR 0.62-0.78) and up to 5 years (OR 0.64-0.67); ERAH reduced the incidence of perioperative wound complications (P-values 0.001-0.03); however, harvest times were increased with ERAH (P < 0.0005). We conclude that ERAH is non-inferior to open radial artery harvesting in terms of mortality, graft quality and patency rates, but superior in terms of reducing perioperative wound complications, with good cosmetic effect. However, these benefits come at the cost of increased harvesting time.

Predictive value of great saphenous vein mapping prior to endoscopic harvesting in coronary artery bypass surgery.

OBJECTIVES: The use of endoscopic vein harvesting in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting is increasing, often using bedside mapping. However, data on the predictive value of great saphenous vein (GSV) mapping are scarce. This study assessed whether preoperative mapping could predict final conduit diameter. METHODS: A prospective registry was created that included 251 patients. Saphenous vein mapping was performed prior to endoscopic vein harvesting at 3 predetermined sites. After harvesting and preparing the GSV, the outer diameters were measured. Appropriate graft size was defined as an outer diameter between 3 and 6 mm. RESULTS: A total of 753 GSV segments were analysed. The average mapping diameter was 3.2 ± 0.7 mm. The harvested GSV had a mean diameter of 4.7 ± 0.8 mm. Mapping diameters were significantly positively correlated with actual GSV diameters (correlation coefficient, 0.47; P < 0.001). If the preoperative mapping diameters were between 1.5 and 5 mm, 96.6% of the GSVs had suitable dimensions after endoscopic vein harvesting. CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative bedside mapping moderately predicts final GSV size after endoscopic harvesting but could not detect unsuitable vein segments. However, the majority of endoscopically harvested GSVs had diameters suitable to be used as coronary bypass grafts.

Is endoscopic radial artery harvesting open for business?

With the resurgence of the radial artery in coronary artery bypass grafting, the debate on the optimal harvesting technique continues. Here, we comment on a randomized series in which the authors conclude that endoscopic harvesting techniques offer the benefit of improved cosmetic outcomes and decreased neurological complications with comparable graft-related outcomes when compared with open harvesting. We conclude that although this study is well designed and conducted, there are several areas of concern including surgical technique and statistical power.

Open radial artery harvesting better preserves endothelial function compared to the endoscopic approach.

OBJECTIVES: Both the open and endovascular techniques are commonly used for harvesting the radial artery (ORAH and ERAH, respectively), and yet, very little is known about the effects of these 2 techniques on endothelial integrity and function of the radial artery (RA). The aim of this study was to assess the endothelial integrity and function of RA harvested using the 2 approaches. METHODS: Two independent surgical teams working in the same institution routinely use the RA for coronary artery bypass grafting exclusively employing either ORAH or ERAH. Thirty-nine consecutive patients were enrolled in this comparative study. Endothelial function after ORAH or ERAH was assessed by using the wire myograph system. The integrity of the RA endothelium was evaluated by immunohistochemical staining for erythroblast transformation specific-related gene. RESULTS: The vasodilation in response to acetylcholine was significantly higher in RA harvested with ORAH (P ≤ 0.001 versus ERAH). Endothelial integrity was not different between the 2 groups. CONCLUSIONS: ORAH is associated with a significantly higher endothelium-dependent vasodilation. Further investigation on the potential implications of these findings in terms of graft spasm and patency as well as clinical outcomes are needed.

[Endoscopic harvesting of internal mammary artery for coronary artery bypass grafting]. / Éndoskopicheskoe vydelenie vnutrennei grudnoi arterii iz mini-torakotomii pri mammarno-koronarnom shuntirovanii.

Endoscopic harvesting of internal mammary artery for minimally invasive coronary artery bypass surgery seems to be highly justified and expedient. Technical features of this procedure are reviewed in the article. There are certain advantages of this method including ligation of proximal branches, reduced surgical trauma, better cosmetic results and enhanced postoperative rehabilitation.

Endoscopic radial artery harvesting does not compromise graft patency for coronary artery bypass graft: a meta analysis of 2782 patients.

BACKGROUND: Endoscopic radial artery harvesting is a favourable harvesting technique which provides excellent cosmetic result and low incidence of incision related complications, however the impact of this technique on graft quality is less well-explained. We sought to evaluate the impact of harvesting technique on graft patency and relevant clinical outcomes in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft (CABG). METHOD: A systematic literature search was conducted to identify publications containing comparisons between different sampling skills in CABG, data was extracted and analysed with Revman, Downs and Black score was applied to evaluate the methodological quality of included studies. RESULT: Ten studies containing 2782 patients were undertaken, the quality was generally acceptable. Pooled analysis results indicate endoscopic radial artery harvesting was associated with a lower incidence of wound infection and a similar incidence of haematoma formation compared with open harvesting. The difference in graft patency and all-cause mortality was insignificant between two cohorts. CONCLUSION: Endoscopic radial artery harvesting is a safe technique and provides equivalent graft patency as compared with open harvesting, further investigation is required to confirm the aforementioned conclusion and evaluate the impact of harvesting technique on hand sensory and motor function.

Endoscopic radial artery harvesting procedure for coronary artery bypass grafting.

Development and adoption of endoscopic minimally invasive saphenous vein harvesting prompted its application to the radial artery in an effort to minimize surgical trauma. Recently, we reported that endoscopic radial artery harvesting was associated with better wound appearance and it proved to be safe and effective, with less pain and fewer wound complications than the open surgical technique. Based on this positive experience, our institution adopted endoscopic radial artery harvesting, hence the aim of this manuscript is to describe the minimally invasive endoscopic radial artery harvesting for coronary artery bypass grafting.

Endoscopy-assisted iliotibial tract harvesting for skull base reconstruction: feasibility on a cadaveric model.

During the last years, multiple methods and a wide set of materials for skull base reconstruction have been described. In our experience, the ideal graft for duraplasty is the iliotibial tract due to its favorable characteristics in terms of thickness, pliability, and strength. In this report, we show the iliotibial tract-harvesting technique under endoscopic guidance with a minimally invasive approach using a cadaveric model. Two longitudinal incisions of 1 cm each were made at 4 cm down a line drawn between the anterior-superior iliac spine and the lateral margin of patella at the extremities of the middle third of the thigh. By using a set of instruments for endoscopic face-lifting, the graft was easily set up and harvested. The endoscopic approach is associated with less visible scars, but longer operative time in comparison with open traditional procedure. The pros and cons in terms of morbidity need to be evaluated by further studies on actual cases.