When Blood Cell Counts Matter: Hypereosinophilic Syndrome as a Rare Cause of Ischemic Strokes.

Hypereosinophilic syndrome (HES) is a rare condition characterized by elevated eosinophil counts (>1.5 x 109 on two consecutive measurements), which are of myeloid clonal in origin or are driven by excess cytokines. One subtype of HES exhibits the Fip1-like 1-platelet-derived growth factor receptor alpha (FIP1L1-PDGFRA) fusion gene, a gain-of-function mutation resulting in a hyperactive tyrosine kinase. HES, especially the FIP1L1-PDGFRA variant, exhibits an excellent response to chemotherapy with imatinib. In this report, we present a 38-year-old patient with no contributory past medical history who experienced sudden-onset fatigue, ataxia, visual changes, and headaches. He was found to have multiple small acute infarcts in his cerebrum and cerebellum. A stroke work-up, including transthoracic echocardiogram (TTE), transesophageal echocardiogram (TEE), and computed tomography angiography (CTA), did not yield insight into the origin of his infarcts. On CBC, he was consistently hypereosinophilic, and a bone marrow biopsy revealed hypercellularity and the FIP1L1-PDGFRA fusion gene, confirming the diagnosis of HES. The patient was treated first with methylprednisolone and then imatinib with excellent response. It appears that, in our patient, strokes were not of a thromboembolic nature but rather due to hypercoagulability. In this report, we advocate for considering HES and emphasize the importance of revisiting basic laboratory studies such as a CBC if the standard stroke workup fails to elucidate the mechanism behind ischemic strokes with an embolic pattern.

The challenge of diagnosing and classifying eosinophilia and eosinophil disorders: A review.

Eosinophilia is a feature of multiple conditions, both hematologic and non-hematologic, and may be associated with organ damage. The pathogenesis of eosinophilia can follow two distinct pathways. Primary eosinophilia is caused by a cell-intrinsic mechanism originating from clonal expansion of eosinophils through acquisition of a somatic mutation, such as FIP1L1-PDGFRA. In recent years, great progress has been made in the field of pathogenesis and molecularly targeted therapy of neoplastic eosinophilia. The diagnostic procedure should include, among other things, morphologic analysis of blood and bone marrow samples, cytogenetics and fluorescence in situ-hybridization tests to detect evidence of an acute or chronic myeloid or lymphoid disorder. Secondary eosinophilia follows a cell-extrinsic mechanism as a response to exogenous cytokines. In most clinical cases, peripheral blood eosinophilia is reactive and typically associated with non-hematological disorders such as infections, allergic conditions, connective tissue disorders, vasculitis, malignancy, or endocrinopathies. Nonetheless, the cause of most cases of hypereosinophilic syndrome remains unknown. In this article, we present a short review focused on differential diagnosis of eosinophilia and eosinophilic disorders. The diagnosis of eosinophilia is a challenge for physicians; thus this review may be useful in clinical practice.

FIP1L1-PDGFRα-Positive Loeffler Endocarditis-A Distinct Cause of Heart Failure in a Young Male: The Role of Multimodal Diagnostic Tools.

The presence of the Fip1-Like1-platelet-derived growth factor receptor alpha (FIP1L1-PDGFRα) fusion gene represents a rare cause of hypereosinophilic syndrome (HES), which is associated with organ damage. The aim of this paper is to emphasize the pivotal role of multimodal diagnostic tools in the accurate diagnosis and management of heart failure (HF) associated with HES. We present the case of a young male patient who was admitted with clinical features of congestive HF and laboratory findings of hypereosinophilia (HE). After hematological evaluation, genetic tests, and ruling out reactive causes of HE, a diagnosis of positive FIP1L1-PDGFRα myeloid leukemia was established. Multimodal cardiac imaging identified biventricular thrombi and cardiac impairment, thereby raising suspicion of Loeffler endocarditis (LE) as the cause of HF; this was later confirmed by a pathological examination. Despite hematological improvement under corticosteroid and imatinib therapy, anticoagulant, and patient-oriented HF treatment, there was further clinical progression and subsequent multiple complications (including embolization), which led to patient death. HF is a severe complication that diminishes the demonstrated effectiveness of imatinib in the advanced phases of Loeffler endocarditis. Therefore, the need for an accurate identification of heart failure etiology in the absence of endomyocardial biopsy is particularly important for ensuring effective treatment.

Lymphomatoid papulosis associated with myeloid neoplasm with eosinophilia and FIP1L1::PDGFRA rearrangement: Successful imatinib treatment in two cases.

Lymphomatoid papulosis (LyP) is a benign condition, listed among primary cutaneous CD30+ lymphoproliferative disorders. Its typical picture consists of relapsing-remitting papular lesions and it can be encountered in the course of a hematologic disease, at times representing its first manifestation. Hypereosinophilic syndromes are a heterogeneous group of disorders characterized by persistent peripheral blood hypereosinophilia that may lead to life-threatening organ damage. Among eosinophilic disorders, the subtype identified as myeloid/lymphoid neoplasm with eosinophilia and tyrosine kinase gene fusions has aroused particular interest due to its excellent response to tyrosine kinase inhibitors, including imatinib. Here, we described the case of two 33-year-old men presenting with LyP and myeloid neoplasm with eosinophilia and FIP1L1::PDGFRA rearrangement who achieved complete clinical and molecular remission of both conditions a few months after starting imatinib.

FIP1L1-PDGFRA fusion gene in T-lymphoblastic lymphoma: A case report.

BACKGROUND: T-lymphoblastic lymphoma (T-LBL) is an aggressive malignancy of T-lymphoid precursors, rarely co-occurring with myeloid/lymphoid neoplasms with eosinophilia (M/LNs-Eo), with consequent rearrangement of tyrosine kinase (TK)-related genes. The FIP1L1-PDGFRA fusion gene is the most frequent molecular abnormality seen in eosinophilia-associated myeloproliferative disorders, but is also present in acute myeloid leukemia (AML), T-lymphoblastic leukemia/lymphoma (TLL), or both simultaneously. T-LBL mainly affects children and young adults, involving lymph node, bone marrow, and thymus. It represents about 85% of all immature lymphoblastic lymphomas, whereas immature B-cell lymphomas comprise approximately 15% of all cases of LBL. CASE: In this case report, we present an example of T cell lymphoblastic lymphoma with coexistent eosinophelia, treated successfully with a tyrosine-kinase inhibitor (TKI). CONCLUSION: FIP1L1-PDGFRA-positive T-LBL and myeloproliferative disorders have excellent response to low-dose treatment with (TKI) imatinib. Most patients achieve rapid and complete hematologic and molecular remission within weeks.

An intriguing case of a paravertebral extramedullary erythropoiesis presenting as tumor-mimicking lesion in a patient with eosinophilia with FIP1L1-PDGFRA rearrangement.

Extramedullary hematopoiesis in the posterior mediastinum is rare. Our case interested a 28-year-old man with a history of eosinophilia with FIP1L1-PDGFRA fusion gene who had a mediastinal mass surgically excised. Pathological examination concluded to an extramedullary erythropoiesis. This case is original by its location and the presence of only the erythroblastic line rearrangement.

[FIP1L1::PDGFRA-positive chronic eosinophilic leukemia showing slowly progressive cardiac impairment].

This report describes a 69-year-old man with eosinophilia that was detected during a medical check-up. A review of his medical history revealed that his absolute eosinophil count was 990/µl at the age of 55 and increased to 5,380/µl at the age of 69. Electrocardiogram revealed first-degree atrioventricular block at the age of 58, followed by ST-segment depression and a negative T wave at the age of 65. The echocardiogram was normal at the age of 65. We diagnosed him with FIP1L1::PDGFRA-positive chronic eosinophilic leukemia by detecting the FIP1L1::PDGFRA fusion gene by fluorescence in situ hybridization. He had no symptoms at the first visit; however, echocardiography and contrast-enhanced computed tomography revealed an abnormal structure, considered a thrombus, within the left ventricular apex and apex wall thickening. We initiated imatinib (100 mg/day), and the eosinophilia disappeared in a month. However, his cardiac impairment worsened, and he gradually developed symptoms of heart failure. This case is valuable because it shows the long-term course of the disease, with 15 years of laboratory findings until diagnosis. Our findings suggest that in cases of eosinophilia with an abnormal electrocardiogram, contrast-enhanced cardiac magnetic resonance imaging should be considered earlier.

Eosinophils and eosinophil-associated disorders: immunological, clinical, and molecular complexity.

Eosinophils and their mediators play a crucial role in various reactive states such as bacterial and viral infections, chronic inflammatory disorders, and certain hematologic malignancies. Depending on the underlying pathology, molecular defect(s), and the cytokine- and mediator-cascades involved, peripheral blood and tissue hypereosinophilia (HE) may develop and may lead to organ dysfunction or even organ damage which usually leads to the diagnosis of a HE syndrome (HES). In some of these patients, the etiology and impact of HE remain unclear. These patients are diagnosed with idiopathic HE. In other patients, HES is diagnosed but the etiology remains unknown - these patients are classified as idiopathic HES. For patients with HES, early therapeutic application of agents reducing eosinophil counts is usually effective in avoiding irreversible organ damage. Therefore, it is important to systematically explore various diagnostic markers and to correctly identify the disease elicitors and etiology. Depending on the presence and type of underlying disease, HES are classified into primary (clonal) HES, reactive HES, and idiopathic HES. In most of these patients, effective therapies can be administered. The current article provides an overview of the pathogenesis of eosinophil-associated disorders, with special emphasis on the molecular, immunological, and clinical complexity of HE and HES. In addition, diagnostic criteria and the classification of eosinophil disorders are reviewed in light of new developments in the field.

Pruritus as a Presenting Symptom of FIP1L1-PDGFRA-Positive Chronic Eosinophilic Leukemia.

Eosinophilia can be found in a variety of benign and malignant conditions, and a persistent eosinophilic count of more than 1500/mm3 necessitates additional investigation. Patients with FIP1L1-PDGFRA-positive chronic eosinophilic leukemia might present as asymptomatic or in a catastrophic state with multi-organ involvement. We present the case of a young male patient who was diagnosed with FIP1L1-PDGFRA chronic eosinophilic leukemia after a long history of recurrent cutaneous symptoms with no systemic signs.

Diagnosis and treatment of eosinophilic myocarditis.

Eosinophilic myocarditis is a type of inflammatory cardiomyopathy characterized by eosinophilic infiltration into myocardial tissue. The accurate myocarditis incidence rate is difficult to determine because of the clinical limitations of an endomyocardial biopsy. The primary pathogenesis of eosinophilic myocarditis is the release of related substances by eosinophils, leading to cell membrane damage and cell destruction. However, evidence suggests that specific genes play a role in myocarditis development.As CMR imaging availability increases, the diagnosis rate of eosinophilic myocarditis will increase. The diagnosis of myocarditis mainly depends on an endocardial biopsy. Glucocorticoids can relieve patients' symptoms, but the early use of steroids may prevent intermediate disease stage development (i.e., thrombonecrosis and fibrosis with wall thrombosis). Anticoagulant therapy may also affect disease development. In addition to routine follow-up, a regular myocardial biopsy should be considered for discharged patients, if possible.

Paratrabecular myelofibrosis and occult mastocytosis are strong morphological clues to suspect FIP1L1-PDGFRA translocation in hypereosinophilia.

To study the clinico-haematological and histopathological characteristics of FIP1L1-PDGFRA rearranged hypereosinophilia/hypereosinophilic syndrome (F/P+ve HE/HES), a retrospective analysis of patients with F/P+ve HE diagnosed over a period of 43 months was performed. Peripheral blood smears, bone marrow aspirate (BMA) and biopsies (BMB) were reviewed in each case and; reticulin stain and immunohistochemistry for mast cell tryptase (MCT) and CD117 was performed. F/P+ve HE was diagnosed in a total of ten patients during study period. All patients were males with a median age of 36 years (23-44 years). The median duration of presenting complaints was 7 months (2 months-3 years) which included specific symptoms related to various organs (80% of cases). Anaemia, thrombocytopenia and splenomegaly were seen in 60%, 50% and 90% of the cases respectively. Mastocytosis was not obvious in BMA but identified by MCT on BMB in all cases. Myelofibrosis (grade ≥ 1) was seen in 80% of the cases and includes multifocal paratrabecular fibrosis in 50% of the biopsies. Our study shows that bone marrow mastocytosis and myelofibrosis are very useful morphological indicators to suspect F/P+ve HE and suggests the routine use of reticulin staining and MCT immunohistochemistry in all BMBs performed for the evaluation of HE/HES.

The Spectrum of Hypereosinophilia and Associated Clonal Disorders - A Real-World Data Based on Combined Retrospective and Prospective Analysis from a Tropical Setting.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the frequency, etiological spectrum and treatment outcome of hypereosinophilia (HE) and hypereosinophilic syndromes (HES) in a tropical setting. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of hospital data of five years (January 2009 to December 2013) and a comprehensive prospective evaluation of patients presenting with HE/HES over a period of 33 months (January 2014 to September 2016) was performed. RESULTS: HE/HES was diagnosed in a total of 125 patients during the study period with an estimated prevalence of 0.5-1 case per 100,000 population in our hospital settings. 41 patients were excluded from the final analysis due to lack of sufficient data. Infections, especially helminths were the commonest cause (34%) followed by primary/clonal HE/HES (24%) and reactive HE/HES secondary to various clonal disorders (14.3%). A lymphocytic variant of HES and FIP1L1-PDGFRA positive HES were diagnosed in 3.6% each. Imatinib-responsive BCR-ABL1 negative HE/HES constitute 7.1% in our patients. None of the clinical or routine laboratory features including the age of patients, duration of HE, presence or absence of organomegaly, hemoglobin levels, eosinophil %, absolute eosinophil count, total leukocyte count, platelet counts, serum IgE levels or presence of myelofibrosis could predict or exclude malignancy in patients with HE/HES. The absence of blasts in peripheral blood or the absence of >5% blasts in bone marrow does not exclude primary/clonal HES. CONCLUSIONS: An underlying malignancy (Primary HE/HES and neoplasms leading to reactive HES; 35.7%) is diagnosed with nearly equal frequency compared to infections (34.5%) in tropical settings. There are no hematological or serological parameters, which can reliably be used to exclude an underlying malignancy, necessitating a thorough follow-up and comprehensive work-up in patients with HE/HES.

Imatinib for the treatment of hypereosinophilic syndromes.

INTRODUCTION: Hypereosinophilic syndromes (HES) encompass a group of disorders defined by sustained peripheral blood hypereosinophilia >1500/mm3 and evidence of eosinophilia-associated organ impairment. Approximately 10% of HES patients may harbor a cryptic deletion on chromosome 4 leading to formation of the FIP1L1-PDGFRA (F/P) fusion gene; these patients are diagnosed as F/P-mutated myeloid/lymphoid neoplasms with eosinophilia (MLN-eo). Areas covered: This review discusses the results of IM treatment in HES depending on mutation status. The literature on IM therapy in HES by searching PubMed for the terms 'imatinib mesylate', 'hypereosinophilic syndromes' and 'FIP1L1-PDGFRA' has been reviewed. The author's publications as well as his own experience in the field of HES treatment remain a significant contribution to this work. Expert commentary: Imatinib mesylate, a first generation tyrosine kinase inhibitor, has revolutionized the therapeutic approach to patients with hypereosinophilic syndromes and detectable F/P fusion gene. The response to IM in F/P-mutated MLN-eo is universal with minimal side effects. IM at 100mg per day induces complete molecular remission and even lower doses can be efficient to maintain durable response. Some patients may remain in continued remission after IM discontinuation. Resistance to IM is associated with dismal prognosis. IM is less effective in F/P-unmutated HES with short-lived response.

Myeloid neoplasm with eosinophilia associated with isolated extramedullary FIP1L1/PDGFRA rearrangement.

Myeloid neoplasms with eosinophilia associated with PDGFRA rearrangement are very responsive to tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). Herein, we report a case of a 53-year-old man with eosinophilia and a well-differentiated extramedullary myeloid tumor with evidence of FIP1L1/PDGFRA rearrangement by fluorescent in situ hybridization in the extramedullary tissue. His bone marrow evaluation revealed a hypercellular marrow with eosinophilia but without evidence of a FIP1L1/PDGFRA rearrangement. The patient was treated with imatinib at a dose of 100 mg daily and responded with normalization of his peripheral eosinophil count. The case raises the possibility that an extramedullary myeloid tumor may represent a primary site for PDGFRA rearrangement, and highlights the importance of performing cytogenetic testing on extramedullary tissue. Detection of the chromosomal rearrangement is critical for initiation of effective targeted therapy that can improve patient outcomes.

A neoplasm with FIP1L1-PDGFRA fusion presenting as pediatric T-cell lymphoblastic leukemia/lymphoma without eosinophilia.

The 2016 World Health Organization (2016 WHO) classification of hematopoietic malignancies classifies neoplasms with a fusion between the FIP1L1 and PDGFRA genes in 4q12 into a group called "myeloid and lymphoid neoplasms with eosinophilia and abnormalities of PDGFRA, PDGFRB or FGFR1 or with PCM1-JAK2". Neoplasms characterized by this fusion are pluripotent stem cell disorders that can show both myeloid and lymphoid differentiation. They typically occur in adult patients and most are characterized by eosinophilia. We describe identification of a FIP1L1-PDGFRA fusion in a 13-year-old boy who presented with T-lymphoblastic leukemia/lymphoma without eosinophilia. Detection of FIP1L1-PDGFRA driven neoplasms at diagnosis is usually critical for proper treatment, since almost all reported cases responded to tyrosine kinase inhibitors. However, our patient's leukemia was refractory to standard chemotherapy, and did not show a meaningful response to tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy. Testing for a FIP1L1-PDGFRA rearrangement is at present limited to patients with idiopathic hypereosinophilia, and we hypothesize that this abnormality may be under-diagnosed in children with acute leukemias.

Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors in the Treatment of Eosinophilic Neoplasms and Systemic Mastocytosis.

The World Health Organization's semimolecular classification of eosinophilias emphasizes neoplasms driven by fusion tyrosine kinases. More than 80% of patients with systemic mastocytosis carry the KIT D816V mutation, the primary driver of disease pathogenesis. Genetic annotation of these diseases is critical and affords opportunities for targeted therapy. This article discusses our understanding of the mutated tyrosine kinome of eosinophilic neoplasms and systemic mast cell disease, and the successes and limitations of available therapies. Use of tyrosine kinase inhibitors as a bridge to hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, and development of more selective and potent tyrosine kinase inhibitors is also highlighted.

Hypereosinophilic syndrome: endomyocardial biopsy versus echocardiography to diagnose cardiac involvement.

OBJECTIVE: To compare echocardiograms and endomyocardial biopsies to diagnose cardiac involvement in hypereosinophilic syndrome. METHODS: We examined the agreement between echocardiography and endomyocardial biopsies to detect cardiac involvement in hypereosinophilic syndrome by reviewing cases identified as hypereosinophilia or hypereosinophilic syndrome in Mayo Clinic databases from January 1978 through June 2009. Single-organ cases of eosinophilia such as eosinophilic fasciitis and eosinophilic gastroenteritis were excluded. We recorded echocardiogram and endomyocardial biopsy results including biopsy staining for eosinophil granule major basic protein (if performed). Clinical and laboratory features documented included presenting symptom(s), maximum total eosinophil count, dose of prednisone (if any) and eosinophil count at the time of endomyocardial biopsy, cardiac enzymes, serum tryptase level, electrocardiogram result, the result of testing for the FIP1L1-PDGFRA fusion gene, complications associated with the biopsy procedures and available follow-up information. RESULTS: From a total of 387 patients' records screened 288 met the criteria for hypereosinophilic syndrome and of these 240 had echocardiograms. Among these patients there were 138 normal echocardiograms, 67 had echocardiograms without findings of hypereosinophilic syndrome but with one or more other abnormalities, and 35 had echocardiograms with findings consistent with hypereosinophilic syndrome. Twenty-five patients from this group of 35 patients had both echocardiogram and endomyocardial biopsy. In 15 patients there was agreement between both endomyocardial biopsy and echocardiography as to the presence (n = seven) or absence (n = eight) for findings of cardiac involvement. In 10 of 25 patients test results diverged: 3 patients with positive echocardiographic changes did not have confirmatory findings by endomyocardial biopsy and seven patients with positive biopsy findings had echocardiograms without findings of hypereosinophilic syndrome. CONCLUSIONS: Echocardiograms and endomyocardial biopsies agree for presence or absence of cardiac involvement 60% of the time. Endomyocardial biopsy detected cardiac involvement in 7 patients in whom the echocardiogram was negative for findings of hypereosinophilic syndrome.

Leukemogenic kinase FIP1L1-PDGFRA and a small ubiquitin-like modifier E3 ligase, PIAS1, form a positive cross-talk through their enzymatic activities.

Fusion tyrosine kinases play a crucial role in the development of hematological malignancies. FIP1L1-PDGFRA is a leukemogenic fusion kinase that causes chronic eosinophilic leukemia. As a constitutively active kinase, FIP1L1-PDGFRA stimulates downstream signaling molecules, leading to cellular proliferation and the generation of an anti-apoptotic state. Contribution of the N-terminal FIP1L1 portion is necessary for FIP1L1-PDGFRA to exert its full transforming activity, but the underlying mechanisms have not been fully characterized. We identified PIAS1 as a FIP1L1-PDGFRA association molecule by yeast two-hybrid screening. Our analyses indicate that the FIP1L1 portion of FIP1L1-PDGFRA is required for efficient association with PIAS1. As a consequence of the association, FIP1L1-PDGFRA phosphorylates PIAS1. Moreover, the kinase activity of FIP1L1-PDGFRA stabilizes PIAS1. Therefore, PIAS1 is one of the downstream targets of FIP1L1-PDGFRA. Moreover, we found that PIAS1, as a SUMO E3 ligase, sumoylates and stabilizes FIP1L1-PDGFRA. In addition, suppression of PIAS1 activity by a knockdown experiment resulted in destabilization of FIP1L1-PDGFRA. Therefore, FIP1L1-PDGFRA and PIAS1 form a positive cross-talk through their enzymatic activities. Suppression of sumoylation by ginkgolic acid, a small molecule compound inhibiting a SUMO E1-activating enzyme, also destabilizes FIP1L1-PDGFRA, and while the tyrosine kinase inhibitor imatinib suppresses FIP1L1-PDGFRA-dependent cell growth, ginkgolic acid or siRNA of PIAS1 has a synergistic effect with imatinib. In conclusion, our results suggest that sumoylation by PIAS1 is a potential target in the treatment of FIP1L1-PDGFRA-positive chronic eosinophilic leukemia.