Finerenone's Impact on Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events in Chronic Kidney Disease and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Systematic Review.

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) impacts about 10% of adults globally and substantially elevates the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), such as heart attacks, strokes, cardiovascular-related deaths, and hospital admissions due to heart failure. The interplay between CKD and cardiovascular disease (CVD) leads to poor health outcomes. Nevertheless, there is a scarcity of systematic reviews focusing on the effectiveness of finerenone, a new non-steroidal mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist (MRA), in lowering these risks. In this systematic review, we aim to evaluate the impact of finerenone on reducing MACE in individuals with CKD and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). CKD pathophysiology involves hyperglycemia, hypertension, and dyslipidemia, leading to glomerular hyperfiltration, inflammation, and fibrosis. Traditional treatments, including angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEi), angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs), and sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2i), often fall short in preventing cardiovascular events. Steroidal MRAs like spironolactone and eplerenone, while effective in reducing proteinuria, are limited by hyperkalemia risks. Finerenone offers a more selective mechanism, reducing sodium retention, inflammation, and fibrosis, with a lower risk of hyperkalemia. We searched five electronic databases comprehensively, identifying studies consistently demonstrating that finerenone significantly reduces MACE and improves renal outcomes by reducing albuminuria and slowing the fall in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). However, limitations include study heterogeneity, short follow-up periods, and potential publication bias. In conclusion, finerenone shows promise as a therapeutic option for CKD and T2DM, reducing MACE and improving renal outcomes. Further research is needed to understand its long-term benefits and safety across diverse populations.

Finerenone in Patients With a Recent Worsening Heart Failure Event: The FINEARTS-HF Trial.

BACKGROUND: Patients with heart failure (HF) and a recent worsening heart failure (WHF) event are known to be at high risk of recurrent hospitalization and death, regardless of ejection fraction. OBJECTIVES: This study examined the efficacy and safety of the nonsteroidal mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist (MRA) finerenone in relation to the recency of a WHF event. METHODS: FINEARTS-HF (FINerenone trial to investigate Efficacy and sAfety superioR to placebo in paTientS with Heart Failure) was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of finerenone in patients with HF and left ventricular ejection fraction ≥40%. In this prespecified analysis, we assessed the risk of cardiovascular (CV) events and response to finerenone vs placebo in relation to the time from WHF to randomization (during or within 7 days, 7 days to 3 months, >3 months, or no prior WHF). The primary outcome was a composite of total (first and recurrent) WHF events and CV death, analyzed using a proportional rates method. RESULTS: Of 6,001 patients validly randomized to finerenone or placebo, 1,219 (20.3%) were enrolled during (749 [12.5%]) or within 7 days (470 [7.8%]), 2,028 (33.8%) between 7 days and 3 months, and 937 (15.6%) >3 months from a WHF event; 1,817 (30.3%) had no prior history of WHF. Rates of the primary composite outcome varied inversely with time since WHF, with >2-fold higher risk in those enrolled during or within 7 days of WHF compared with those enrolled >3 months from WHF or without prior WHF (risk ratio [RR]: 2.13; 95% CI: 1.82-2.55). Compared to placebo, finerenone appeared to lower the risk of the primary composite to a greater extent in those enrolled within 7 days of WHF (RR: 0.74; 95% CI: 0.57-0.95) or between 7 days and 3 months of WHF (RR: 0.79; 95% CI: 0.64-0.97) than in those >3 months from WHF or without prior WHF (RR: 0.99; 95% CI: 0.81-1.21); however, no definitive treatment-by-time interaction could be confirmed (P = 0.07). Greater absolute risk reductions with finerenone were accordingly seen in those with recent WHF (Ptrend = 0.011). The risk of adverse events including hyperkalemia and worsening renal function among patients assigned to finerenone was not increased in those with recent WHF. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with those without recent WHF, patients with HF and mildly reduced or preserved ejection fraction who have experienced a recent WHF event are at higher risk for recurrent HF events and CV death; a possible signal of enhanced absolute treatment benefit with finerenone in this population requires further confirmation in future studies. (Study to Evaluate the Efficacy [Effect on Disease] and Safety of Finerenone on Morbidity [Events Indicating Disease Worsening] & Mortality [Death Rate] in Participants With Heart Failure and Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction [Proportion of Blood Expelled Per Heart Stroke] Greater or Equal to 40% [FINEARTS-HF], NCT04435626; A study to gather information on the influence of study drug finerenone on the number of deaths and hospitalizations in participants with heart failure EudraCT 2020-000306-29).

Finerenone and left ventricular hypertrophy in chronic kidney disease and type 2 diabetes.

AIMS: Left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) has been associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular (CV) disease and linked to increased morbidity and mortality. In patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) and type 2 diabetes (T2D), hypertension is common, and patients with these co-morbidities additionally have a high prevalence of LVH. This analysis of the prespecified pooled FIDELITY analysis comprising the randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicentre FIDELIO-DKD and FIGARO-DKD phase III studies aimed to explore the CV and kidney effects of finerenone, a nonsteroidal mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist, in patients with CKD and T2D stratified by a diagnosis of LVH at baseline. METHODS AND RESULTS: A diagnosis of LVH in the FIDELITY patient population was determined at baseline using investigator-reported electrocardiogram (ECG) findings. The two efficacy outcomes, assessed by baseline LVH, were the composite CV outcome of time to CV death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, non-fatal stroke, or hospitalization for heart failure (HHF), and a composite kidney outcome of time to onset of kidney failure, a sustained decrease in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) ≥57% from baseline over ≥4 weeks, or kidney-related death. Safety outcomes by baseline LVH were reported as treatment-emergent adverse events. At baseline out of 13 026 patients in FIDELITY, 96.5% had hypertension and 9.6% had investigator-reported LVH. The relative risk reduction for the composite CV and kidney outcomes with finerenone versus placebo was lower in the LVH subgroup; however, the treatment effect of finerenone was not modified by baseline LVH for either outcome (Pinteraction = 0.1075 for composite CV outcome and Pinteraction = 0.1782 for composite kidney outcome). Analysis of the composite CV outcome components showed a greater reduction in the risk of HHF versus placebo for patients with baseline LVH compared with those without (Pinteraction = 0.0024). Overall safety events were comparable between the LVH subgroups and treatment arms. Treatment-emergent hyperkalaemia was observed more frequently with finerenone versus placebo, but discontinuation rates were low in both treatment arms and between LVH subgroups. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, the overall CV and kidney benefits of finerenone versus placebo were not modified by the presence of LVH at baseline, with overall safety findings being similar between LVH subgroups. A greater benefit was observed for HHF in patients with versus without LVH, suggesting that LVH may be a predictor of the treatment effect of finerenone on HHF.

Options for patients with out-of-control blood pressure: after all avenues have been exhausted.

INTRODUCTION: Uncontrolled hypertension is the leading risk factor for global mortality. Most hypertensive patients can be controlled with standard medication combinations, but some may not respond adequately to ≥3 or even to ≥5 antihypertensive agents. AREAS COVERED: In this review, we summarize the recent literature on difficult-to-treat hypertension identified by a Medline search, and we discuss the options for fourth line and subsequent therapy. EXPERT OPINION: It is essential to confirm resistant hypertension with out-of-office blood pressure measurements and to consider lifestyle factors, adherence to medication and secondary causes of hypertension. When true resistant hypertension is confirmed and blood pressure is not controlled with an optimal triple combination, preferably as a fixed dose combination tablet, spironolactone is usually recommended as the fourth medication. Comorbid conditions should be treated as appropriate with sodium-glucose-cotransporter 2 inhibitors, glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists, sacubitril-valsartan or finerenone. Renal denervation appears to be a useful addition to overcome some of the problems of medication adherence. The endothelin antagonist aprocitentan may be a final option in some countries. Of the drugs in development, the RNA based therapeutics that inhibit angiotensinogen synthesis appear to be some of the most promising.

The role of finerenone in the management of CKD in T2D -Practical considerations for primary care.

The prevalence of diabetes and chronic kidney disease (CKD) is increasing worldwide. Diabetic kidney disease is a chronic condition characterized by a gradual increase in urinary albumin excretion, blood pressure, cardiovascular risk, and a decline in glomerular filtration rate (GFR) that can progress to end-stage kidney disease (ESKD). Individuals with diabetes should be screened for CKD annually. Screening should include both measurement of albuminuria and estimation of GFR (eGFR). The structural changes in diabetic kidney disease in individuals with type 1 diabetes are rather uniform, but the histological picture in those with type 2 diabetes and CKD is on the contrary a mix of changes ranging from minor abnormalities to severe glomerulosclerosis, tubulointerstitial fibrosis, and arteriolohyalinosis. Scarring of the kidneys is closely related to the kidney function. Individuals with diabetes often require multiple therapies to prevent progression of CKD and its associated comorbidities and mortality. Management of cardiorenal risk factors, including lifestyle modification, control of blood glucose, blood pressure, and lipids, use of renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) blockers, use of sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors, and the non-steroidal mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist finerenone in individuals with T2D are the cornerstones of therapy. Primary care physicians (PCPs) play a critical role in identifying individuals with CKD, managing early stages of CKD, and referring those with moderate to severe CKD or rapidly declining kidney function to a nephrologist. Referral to a nephrologist should be considered when certain thresholds for eGFR, albuminuria, proteinuria, hematuria, or hypertension are exceeded. This review summarizes current guidelines for the management of CKD and its complications and highlights the role of PCPs in the care of individuals with CKD.

Role of L-type Ca2+-channels in the vasorelaxing response to finerenone in arteries of human visceral adipose tissue.

Inadequate blood supply to the expanding adipose tissue (AT) is involved in the unhealthy AT remodeling and cardiometabolic consequences of obesity. Because of the pathophysiological role of upregulated mineralocorticoid receptor (MR) signaling in the complications of obesity, this study tested the vasoactive properties of finerenone, a nonsteroidal MR antagonist, in arteries of human AT. Arteries isolated from the visceral AT of obese subjects were studied in a wire myograph. Finerenone resulted in a concentration-dependent relaxation of arteries precontracted with either the thromboxane-A2 analog U46619, ET-1, or high-K+ solution; the steroidal MR antagonist potassium canrenoate, by contrast, did not relax arteries contracted with either U46619 or high-K+ solution. Finerenone-induced relaxation after precontraction with U46619 was greater in the arteries of obese versus nonobese subjects. Mechanistically, the vasorelaxing response to finerenone was not influenced by preincubation with the nitric oxide synthase inhibitor L-NAME or by endothelium removal. Interestingly, finerenone, like the dihydropyridine Ca2+-channel blocker nifedipine, relaxed arteries contracted with the L-type Ca2+-channel agonist Bay K8644. In conclusion, finerenone relaxes arteries of human visceral AT, likely through antagonism of L-type Ca2+ channels. This finding identifies a novel mechanism by which finerenone may improve AT perfusion, hence protecting against the cardiometabolic complications of obesity.

Efficacy and safety of finerenone in individuals with type 2 diabetes mellitus complicated by diabetic kidney disease: A retrospective observational study.

Aim/introduction: Early therapeutic interventions are necessary to reduce cardiovascular and renal composite endpoints in individuals with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and diabetic kidney disease (DKD). Clinical trials have shown that finerenone suppresses cardiovascular and renal composite endpoints by reducing the urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio (UACR) and suppressing the decline in the Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR). However, the efficacy and safety of finerenone in real-world clinical practice remain unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the reduction in the UACR as an efficacy endpoint as well as changes in eGFR and serum potassium levels as safety endpoints before and after finerenone administration. Materials and methods: This retrospective observational study collected data from outpatients with T2DM and DKD upon initiation of finerenone treatment and 3 months after treatment. The primary efficacy endpoint was the change in the UACR from the start of finerenone treatment to after 3 months, while the primary safety endpoints were the changes in serum potassium levels and eGFR over the same period. Results: The mean UACR significantly decreased from 668.6 mg/gCr at the start of finerenone treatment to 367.8 mg/gCr after 3 months (p < 0.001). Contrastingly, serum potassium levels, eGFRs, systolic and diastolic blood pressures, body mass indices, and HbA1c levels showed no significant changes between treatment initiation and 3 months post-treatment (all p > 0.05). Conclusions: In individuals with T2DM and DKD, finerenone treatment significantly reduced the UACR, with no post-treatment changes in potassium levels or eGFRs. Trial registration: This trial was registered with the University Hospital Medical Information Network Clinical Trial Registry (UMIN000054821).

First interim results from FINE-REAL: a prospective, non-interventional, phase 4 study providing insights into the use and safety of finerenone in a routine clinical setting.

BACKGROUND: Finerenone, a selective non-steroidal mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist, improves kidney and cardiovascular outcomes in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) associated with type 2 diabetes (T2D). The FINE-REAL study (NCT05348733) aims to evaluate the characteristics and treatment patterns of participants treated with finerenone in clinical practice. METHODS: FINE-REAL is a prospective, single-arm, non-interventional study of patients initiated on finerenone as part of their routine care in accordance with country-approved labels. The study, initiated in June 2022, is expected to be completed by January 2028. The cutoff for this pre-specified interim analysis was June 13, 2023. RESULTS: Participants were recruited across nephrology, endocrinology, cardiology, and primary care settings. Of 556 participants enrolled in the study by the cut-off date, 504 were included in this analysis (median follow-up duration of 7 months [finerenone treatment initiation to last recorded observation]). At baseline, 76.1% of participants were in the high or very high (KDIGO) CKD risk categories. Angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin receptor blockers and sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors were prescribed to 71.8% and 46.6% of participants, respectively. Based on prescribing information, 87.9% and 12.1% of participants initiated finerenone at doses of 10 and 20 mg, respectively. Finerenone treatment was uninterrupted in 92.3% of participants after 7 months' median follow-up. Treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 110 (21.8%) participants. Hyperkalemia occurred in 25 (5.0%) participants, with no cases leading to death, dialysis, or hospitalization. CONCLUSION: At this interim analysis, finerenone was initiated in patients with CKD and T2D across various clinical practices participating in the study. Treatment discontinuation and hyperkalemia occurred infrequently.

Chlorthalidone as Secondary Treatment in HFpEF?

This review addresses important issues that face practitioners today concerning the treatment of HFpEF. It points out how the accepted efficacy of HFpEF medication treatment has changed. Medications are now recommended for use in HFpEF that have diuretic properties and are significant because of a reduction in the frequency of the development of heart failure (not mortality). This heart failure incidence reduction appears predictable and is valuable, but it raises the question of the use of chlorthalidone in the treatment of HFpEF. Chlorthalidone has previously been demonstrated to reduce heart failure incidence in the treatment of hypertensive patients which is a similar patient population. Chlorthalidone, possibly with a generic mineralocorticoid antagonist, could be an acceptable low-cost alternate therapy as secondary treatment for HFpEF. Of course, chlorthalidone does not have the other theoretic benefits of the SGLT2 inhibitors or finerenone. It would be helpful if this was discussed in the upcoming HFpEF guidelines especially for use in patients who cannot afford or tolerate the new HFpEF medications.

Early Clinical Experience of Finerenone in People with Chronic Kidney Disease and Type 2 Diabetes in Japan-A Multi-Cohort Study from the FOUNTAIN (FinerenOne mUltidatabase NeTwork for Evidence generAtIoN) Platform.

Background: In the phase 3 clinical trials FIGARO-DKD and FIDELIO-DKD, finerenone reduced the risk of cardiovascular and kidney events among people with chronic kidney disease (CKD) and type 2 diabetes (T2D). Evidence regarding finerenone use in real-world settings is limited. Methods: A retrospective cohort study (NCT06278207) using two Japanese nationwide hospital-based databases provided by Medical Data Vision (MDV) and Real World Data Co., Ltd. (RWD Co., Kyoto Japan), converted to the OMOP common data model, was conducted. Persons with CKD and T2D initiating finerenone from 1 July 2021, to 30 August 2023, were included. Baseline characteristics were described. The occurrence of hyperkalemia after finerenone initiation was assessed. Results: 1029 new users of finerenone were included (967 from MDV and 62 from RWD Co.). Mean age was 69.5 and 72.4 years with 27.3% and 27.4% being female in the MDV and RWD Co. databases, respectively. Hypertension (92 and 95%), hyperlipidemia (59 and 71%), and congestive heart failure (60 and 66%) were commonly observed comorbidities. At baseline, 80% of persons were prescribed angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin-receptor blockers. Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors and glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists were prescribed in 72% and 30% of the study population, respectively. The incidence proportions of hyperkalemia were 2.16 and 2.70 per 100 persons in the MDV and RWD Co. databases, respectively. There were no hospitalizations associated with hyperkalemia observed in either of the two datasets. Conclusions: For the first time, we report the largest current evidence on the clinical use of finerenone in real-world settings early after the drug authorization in Japan. This early evidence from clinical practice suggests that finerenone is used across comorbidities and comedications.

Effectiveness and safety of finerenone in diabetic kidney disease patients: a real-world observational study from China.

AIMS: Finerenone has been approved for treating diabetic kidney disease (DKD) with reducing cardiorenal risk. Real-world data on finerenone treatment for the management of DKD are presently lacking. This study aimed to investigate the effect of finerenone on the renal parameters of the Chinese DKD population in the real-world medical setting for the first time, especially in combination with renin-angiotensin system inhibitors (RASi) and sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i). METHODS: Forty-two DKD patients were selected and completed a 6-month finerenone treatment. Renal parameters and adverse effects were collected at every visit. RESULTS: The median urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio (UACR) was 1426.11 (755.42, 3638.23) mg/g. Among them, the proportion of patients with a UACR of 300-5000 mg/g was 76.2%, and the proportion of patients with a UACR of >5000 mg/g was 14.3%. The median estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was 54.50 (34.16, 81.73) mL/min/1.73 m2. Finerenone decreased the UACR significantly throughout the study period (p < .05). The maximal decline of UACR at month 6 was 73%. Moreover, the proportion of patients with a 30% or greater reduction in UACR was 68.42% in month 6. There was a smaller decline (9-11%) in the eGFR after initiating finerenone (p > .05). One patient each discontinued finerenone due to hyperkalemia (2.4%) and acute kidney injury (2.4%). No patient reported hypotension, breast pain, and gynecomastia. CONCLUSIONS: This study from China first demonstrated finerenone decreased UACR with manageable safety in real-world DKD treatment. A triple regimen of RASi, SGLT2i, and finerenone may be a promising treatment strategy for lowering albuminuria and reducing hyperkalemia risk in advanced DKD patients.

Therapeutic potential of finerenone for diabetic cardiomyopathy: focus on the mechanisms.

Diabetic cardiomyopathy (DCM) is a kind of myocardial disease that occurs in diabetes patients and cannot be explained by hypertensive heart disease, coronary atherosclerotic heart disease and other heart diseases. Its pathogenesis may be closely related to programmed cell death, oxidative stress, intestinal microbes and micro-RNAs. The excessive activation of mineralocorticoid receptors (MR) in DCM can cause damage to the heart and kidneys. The third-generation non-steroidal mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist (MRA), finerenone, can effectively block MR, thus playing a role in protecting the heart and kidneys. This review mainly introduces the classification of MRA, and the mechanism of action, applications and limitations of finerenone in DCM, in order to provide reference for the study of treatment plans for DCM patients.

Clinical Properties and Non-Clinical Testing of Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonists in In Vitro Cell Models.

Mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs) are one of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitors widely used in clinical practice. While spironolactone and eplerenone have a long-standing profile in clinical medicine, finerenone is a novel agent within the MRA class. It has a higher specificity for mineralocorticoid receptors, eliciting less pronounced adverse effects. Although approved for clinical use in patients with chronic kidney disease and heart failure, intensive non-clinical research aims to further elucidate its mechanism of action, including dose-related selectivity. Within the field, animal models remain the gold standard for non-clinical testing of drug pharmacological and toxicological properties. Their role, however, has been challenged by recent advances in in vitro models, mainly through sophisticated analytical tools and developments in data analysis. Currently, in vitro models are gaining momentum as possible platforms for advanced pharmacological and pathophysiological studies. This article focuses on past, current, and possibly future in vitro cell models research with clinically relevant MRAs.

Primary aldosteronism with postoperative elevation of aldosterone treated effectively by finerenone: A case report.

The authors report a case of primary aldosteronism (PA) with postoperative elevation of aldosterone treated effectively by finerenone. The patient was a hypertensive man with a 30-year history of hypertension and sustained an acute myocardial infarction 5 years ago. Bilateral adrenal nodules with hyperplasia were detected and PA was confirmed. His blood potassium, direct renin concentration, and aldosterone level returned to normal after surgery of right adrenalectomy. However, 1 year after surgery, he experienced a decrease in blood potassium and an increase in aldosterone. A saline infusion test revealed an aldosterone level of 124.47 pg/mL. The patient consented to treatment with finerenone. His aldosterone and potassium levels and blood pressure have been controlled well during follow-up. This case highlights the need to screen for secondary hypertension as early as possible. Finerenone may be effective for patients with PA who are not candidates for surgery and those not relieved after surgery.

Kidney and cardiovascular-protective benefits of combination drug therapies in chronic kidney disease associated with type 2 diabetes.

Given the substantial burden of chronic kidney disease associated with type 2 diabetes, an aggressive approach to treatment is required. Despite the benefits of guideline-directed therapy, there remains a high residual risk of continuing progression of chronic kidney disease and of cardiovascular events. Historically, a linear approach to pharmacologic management of chronic kidney disease has been used, in which drugs are added, then adjusted, optimized, or stopped in a stepwise manner based on their efficacy, toxicity, effects on a patient's quality of life, and cost. However, there are disadvantages to this approach, which may result in missing a window of opportunity to slow chronic kidney disease progression. Instead, a pillar approach has been proposed to enable earlier treatment that simultaneously targets multiple pathways involved in disease progression. Combination therapy in patients with chronic kidney disease associated with type 2 diabetes is being investigated in several clinical trials. In this article, we discuss current treatment options for patients with chronic kidney disease associated with type 2 diabetes and provide a rationale for tailored combinations of therapies with complementary mechanisms of action to optimize therapy using a pillar-based treatment strategy. [This article includes a plain language summary as an additional file].

Finerenone and diabetic renal disease: a narrative review.

Overactivation of mineralocorticoid receptors occurs in cardiorenal diseases. Many patients with type 2 diabetes often progress to chronic kidney disease (CKD) and require dialysis. Finerenone is the first oral non-steroidal mineralocorticoid receptor (MR) antagonist used in patients with diabetic kidney disease and heart failure. Finerenone (also known as Kerendia) is more potent than spironolactone in reducing the progression of CKD and exerts its effect equally on the heart and kidneys, improving cardiovascular outcomes. Research demonstrates that finerenone improves proteinuria and glomerular filtration rate (GFR) if taken alone or in combination with sodium-glucose transporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i). Finerenone has been found to decrease mortality in patients with diabetic renal disease and improve quality of life. Its side effects, unlike those of spironolactone, do not include gynecomastia. However, it can result in hyperkalemia, which needs to be monitored. In this narrative review, we aim to investigate the mechanisms of action of finerenone and its implications in patients with type 2 diabetes.

Pharmacological Interventions for Cirrhotic Ascites: From Challenges to Emerging Therapeutic Horizons.

Ascites is the most common complication in patients with decompensated cirrhosis. This condition results in a severely impaired quality of life, excessive healthcare use, recurrent hospitalizations and significant morbidity and mortality. While loop diuretics and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists are commonly employed for symptom relief, our understanding of their impact on survival remains limited. A comprehensive understanding of the underlying pathophysiological mechanism of ascites is crucial for its optimal management. The renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) is increasingly believed to play a pivotal role in the formation of cirrhotic ascites, as RAAS overactivation leads to a reduction in urine sodium excretion then a decrease in the ability of the kidneys to excrete water. In this review, the authors provide an overview of the pathogenesis of cirrhotic ascites, the challenges associated with current pharmacologic treatments, and the previous attempts to modulate the RAAS, followed by a description of some emerging targeted RAAS agents with the potential to be used to treat ascites.

Comparative Efficacy of Finerenone versus Canagliflozin in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease and Type 2 Diabetes: A Matching-Adjusted Indirect Comparison.

This study aimed to close an evidence gap concerning the relative efficacy of finerenone versus SGLT2is in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) and type 2 diabetes (T2D). Canagliflozin was selected as a proxy for the SGLT2i class. Patient-level data of two randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of finerenone (FIDELIO-DKD and FIGARO-DKD) were used alongside aggregated data from CREDENCE, an RCT of canagliflozin. To account for meaningful between-study heterogeneity between each finerenone trial and CREDENCE, a matching-adjusted indirect comparison of a range of efficacy outcomes was undertaken for each finerenone study versus CREDENCE. These results were meta-analyzed, enabling the estimation of the relative effects of finerenone against canagliflozin. For the cardiorenal composite endpoint, the hazard ratio (HR) comparing finerenone to canagliflozin was 1.07 (95% CI: 0.83 to 1.36). The corresponding HRs for all-cause mortality, end-stage kidney disease and cardiovascular death were 0.99 (95% CI: 0.73 to 1.34), 1.03 (95% CI: 0.68 to 1.55) and 0.94 (95% CI: 0.64 to 1.37), respectively. The absence of statistically significant differences was consistent throughout the main analysis and a range of sensitivity analyses. Based on this study, using a large sample of data and adjusted for meaningful differences between the baseline characteristics of the included RCTs, there was no statistically significant evidence indicating a difference in the efficacy of finerenone compared to canagliflozin in the treatment of CKD in patients with T2D.

Post-marketing safety of finerenone: a disproportionality analysis of the FDA adverse event reporting system.

BACKGROUND: Finerenone was approved for the treatment of type 2 diabetes patients with chronic kidney disease. However, the post-marketing safety of finerenone in the real world is unknown. METHODS: The quarterly reported data related to finerenone from the third quarter of 2021 to the second quarter of 2023 were collected by using the FAERS database. Two disproportionality analysis methods were estimated by using Reporting odds ratio (ROR) and Bayesian confidence propagation neural network (BCPNN). RESULTS: A total of 1067 adverse events (AEs) were included. Twenty-four kinds of system organ classes (SOCs) were classified for the organs and systems involved and 39 AEs with significant safety signals were identified using ROR and BCPNN at the preferred terms (PTs) level. Most AEs originated from the United States, and the median time to onset of AEs was 13 days. Three hundred and fifty-one (55.5%) reported serious outcome. The proportion of medication combinations was 29.0%. The most commonly reported AEs were the glomerular filtration rate decreased. Safety signals have also been observed in new and unexpected AEs. CONCLUSION: The analysis of the AE signals may contribute to minimizing the risks associated with its use.