HCV Core-antigen Assay as an Effective Alternative to HCV RNA Quantification in Patients With Hepatitis C.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Hepatitis C virus (HCV) core antigen (Ag) test has been increasingly applied as an effective alternative to conventional molecular tests allowing rapid and affordable diagnosis, which is of paramount relevance to achieve global elimination of HCV infection. MATERIALS AND METHODS: ARCHITECT® HCV Ag test was evaluated in comparison with HCV RNA quantification test (CAP/CTM) to calculate its sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV) and to determine their correlation level. Its performance, according to low and high viral load values and in different treatment stages [during treatment (T), at the end of the therapeutic protocol (EOT) and when sustained virological response (SVR) was evaluated]. RESULTS: In total, 145 samples were included. Considering CAP/CTM, the sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV of the HCV-Ag test were 88.9%, 99.1%, 97.0% and 96.4%, respectively, and the correlation among tests was high (r=0.890), with only five discordant results. A decrease in sensitivity was found for low viral load values (<1,000 IU/ml), but the opposite was verified for high viral concentrations (≥1,000 IU/ml). A good agreement was verified for the T and EOT groups (k=0.789 and k=0.638) and an excellent agreement in the SVR group (k=1.000). CONCLUSION: HCV-Ag seems to be an effective alternative that can be routinely combined with other faster and more accessible tests (e.g., HCV antibody tests) for the identification of new HCV infections in suspected patients, eventually reserving the molecular techniques for samples with discordant results.

Performance comparison of new generation HCV core antigen test versus HCV RNA test in management of hepatitis C virus infection.

The study has evaluated the performance of HCV core antigen (Cag) test by comparing HCV RNA PCR assay which is considered the gold standard for management of HCV infection. Totally, 132 samples sent for HCV RNA (real-time PCR) test were included in the study. Anti-HCV antibody test and HCV Cag test were performed by chemiluminescent enzyme immunoassay (CMEI). Anti-HCV test was positive in all samples. HCV RNA was detected in 112/132 (84.8%) samples, and HCV Cag in 105/132 (79.5%). The most common HCV genotype was genotype 1 (86%). Considering the HCV RNA test as gold standard; the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and accuracy of Cag test were found to be 93.75%, 100%, 100%, 74.07% and 94.69%, respectively, and paired test results were detected as highly concordant. A high level of correlation was seen between HCV RNA and Cag tests, however, the concordance between the two tests appeared to be disrupted at viral loads lower than 103IU/mL. On the contrary, the correlation reached significance for the values higher than 103IU/mL. Viral loads were in the 17-2500IU/mL range for the negative results for Cag test. Pearson's correlation coefficient revealed a considerably high correlation. The concordance between HCV RNA and Cag tests was disrupted under a viral load lower than 103IU/mL. Therefore, it would be appropriate to consider cost effectiveness, advantages and limitations of the HCV RNA and Cag tests during the decision on which method to use for patient management.