Potential Use of Extracellular Vesicles for the HER2 Status Assessment in Breast Cancer Patients.

Human epithelial growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-targeted therapies are effective in patients with HER2-positive breast cancer. Recent advances have shown that HER2-targeted therapies can also be of benefit when treating tumors expressing low levels of HER2, highlighting the importance of identifying the HER2-low subgroup. This clinical trend has opened new therapeutic avenues for patients who were previously ineligible for HER2-targeted therapies. Thus, the development of new diagnostic methods for real-time HER2 profiling is crucial for accurately tailoring the treatment for these patients. We hypothesized that tumor-derived extracellular vesicles (TEVs) could reflect the HER2 profiles of primary tumors and potentially serve as diagnostic tools for HER2 status. This approach was validated using six breast cancer cell lines, which confirmed that the TEVs accurately reflected the HER2 profiles of the tumor cells. TEVs were isolated using an immunoaffinity method, and copy number variation (CNV) in the ERBB2/EIF2C ratio was assessed using droplet digital PCR of DNA from these vesicles. Clinical validation using plasma samples from 33 breast cancer patients further reinforced the diagnostic potential of our method. Pearson's correlation coefficient analysis of the flow cytometry results demonstrated that TEVs reflected HER2 expression in primary cells. To distinguish between HER2-negative and HER2-low patients, the area under the curve (AUC) of the ROC curve in our method was 0.796, with a sensitivity of 53.8% and a specificity of 100%. These findings suggest the clinical utility of extracellular vesicles derived from plasma and emphasize the need for further research to distinguish HER2-negative from HER2-low patients.

Prognostic Impact of HER2 Low Status in Male Breast Cancer: Prospective Cohort Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Male breast cancer (MBC) is a rare disease, and the potential influence of low expression of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2 low) remains unexplored. METHODS: In this prospective cohort study, we evaluated 870 patients treated for MBC between May 2009 and June 2023 to assess HER2 low status and its prognostic implications. RESULTS: With a median follow-up of 43 months (range 1-175 months), 659 eligible patients were categorized into three groups based on HER2 status: 501 (76%) HER2 low, 81 (12.3%) HER2 zero, and 77 (11.7%) HER2 positive. HER2 positivity correlated with younger age, higher proliferation index, non-specific type histology, lymphovascular invasion (LVSI), and low differentiation grade. Notably, all these parameters were equally distributed between the HER2 zero and HER2 low groups. Additionally, HER2 positivity was significantly associated with increased occurrences of regional and distant lymph nodes and pulmonary metastases. However, no statistically significant difference was observed between HER2 zero and HER2 low. Disease-free and overall survival showed no significant disparities between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that HER2 low status is frequently detected in MBC. Despite this, HER2 low did not correlate with clinical and pathological parameters, nor did it impact patients' survival.

Improved Prognosis in HER2-Low Breast Cancer Patients with Reduced Ki67 Index After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy: A Multi-Center Retrospective Study.

Background: HER2-low breast cancer represents a distinct subgroup with unique clinical characteristics and treatment challenges. Nevertheless, it remains uncertain whether there exists a distinction in δKi67 between patients with HER2-low and HER2-zero statuses, and whether the prognosis varies among patients with differing HER2 statuses and δKi67. Methods: We conducted a multi-center retrospective study to investigate the correlation between alterations in Ki67 index following NAC and the prognosis among patients with HER2-low or HER2-zero breast cancer. 3 distinct cohorts comprising patients with HER2-negative breast cancer who underwent NAC were included. Comprehensive clinicopathological data were documented, with particular emphasis on evaluating changes in Ki67 index from baseline to post-NAC. These changes were then correlated with disease-free survival (DFS) through rigorous analysis. Results: Three cohorts, comprising 403, 315, and 72 patients respectively, were finally included. The study found that δKi67 did not show significant associations with other variables and were not identified as independent risk factors for survival. Nevertheless, across the three cohorts, following NAC, HER2-low breast cancer patients with δKi67 below the cut-off value demonstrated a better prognosis compared to those with δKi67 above the cut-off value. Additionally, their prognosis was also superior to that of HER2-zero breast cancer patients with δKi67 below the cut-off value. Conclusion: Our study demonstrates that HER2-low breast cancer patients with δKi67 values below the cut-off point after NAC are associated with improved prognosis. Monitoring δKi67 index and HER2 status may help identify patients who are likely to benefit from NAC and guide personalized treatment strategies.

Impact of low HER2 expression on response to CDK4/6 inhibitor treatment in advanced HR + /HER2- breast cancer: a multicenter real-world data analysis.

PURPOSE: CDK4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i) represent the first-line therapy approach of choice for patients with hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative advanced breast cancer (HR + /HER-ABC). Approximately 50% of HR + /HER2-ABC displays low HER2 expression (HER2 low). Recent data emerging from the DESTINY-Breast04 trial demonstrated practice-changing efficacy of the antibody-drug conjugate trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) in patients with low HER2 expression. Here, we aimed to analyze the impact of low HER2 expression on CDK4/6i therapy response in a well-characterized multicenter HR + /HER-ABC cohort. METHODS: Patients diagnosed with HR + /HER2-ABC who were treated with CDK4/6i in clinical routine between November 2016 and December 2020 at four certified German Breast Cancer Centers were retrospectively identified. The cohort was stratified according to graduation of positivity in HER2 immunohistochemistry (IHC; HER2 zero = IHC score 0 and HER2 low = IHC score 1 + , 2 + /fluorescence in situ hybridization negative). Subgroups were analyzed with regard to progression-free survival (PFS) following CDK4/6i initiation. FINDINGS: The study cohort comprised n = 448 patients. For n = 311 patients, HER2 status from the metastatic site was available. n = 91 (29.3%) cases were HER2 zero and n = 220 cases (70.7%) were HER2 low. There was no significant difference in PFS between the two groups (PFS: 17 months versus 18 months, log-rank p = 0.42). Further, we examined the influence of HER2 expression changes between primary and metastatic tissue (n = 171; HER2 gain/HER2 loss/HER2 stable expression) on CDK4/6i treatment response. Again, there was no significant difference between these three groups, respectively (PFS: 16 months versus 13 months versus 17 months, log-rank p = 0.86). CONCLUSIONS: In our analysis, HER2 status did not have a significant impact on treatment response to CDK4/6i.

Clinical characterization, prognostic, and predictive values of HER2-low in patients with early breast cancer in the PALLAS trial (ABCSG-42/AFT-05/BIG-14-13/PrE0109).

BACKGROUND: Bidirectional crosstalk between HER2 and estrogen receptor (ER) pathways may influence outcomes and the efficacy of endocrine therapy (ET). Low HER2 expression levels (HER2-low) have emerged as a predictive biomarker in patients with breast cancer (BC). METHODS: PALLAS is an open, international, phase 3 study evaluating the addition of palbociclib for 2 years to adjuvant ET in patients with stage II-III ER-positive/HER2-negative BC. To assess the impact of HER2 expression on patient outcomes in the phase III PALLAS trial, we analyzed (1) the association between rate of HER2-low with demographic and clinicopathological parameters, (2) the prognostic value of HER2-low status on invasive disease-free survival (iDFS), distant relapse-free survival (DRFS), and overall survival (OS) and (3) HER2 expression's value as a predictive biomarker of response to palbociclib. HER2-low was defined as HER2 immunohistochemistry (IHC) 1 + or IHC 2 + with negative in situ hybridization (ISH). All pathologic evaluation was performed locally. Prognostic and predictive power of HER2 were assessed with Cox models. RESULTS: From the original PALLAS intention-to-treat population (N = 5753), 5304 patients (92.2%) were included in this analysis. Among these, 2254 patients (42.5%) were classified as having HER2 IHC 0 (HER2-0), and 3050 (57.5%) as having HER2-low disease (1838 with IHC 1 + and 1212 with IHC 2 +). Median follow-up was 59.8 months. HER2-low prevalence varied significantly across 21 participating countries (range 16.7% to 75.6%; p < 0.001) and was more frequent in patients enrolled in North America (63.1%) than in Europe (53.4%) or other regions (53.4%) (p < 0.001). HER2 status was not significantly associated with iDFS in a multivariable Cox model (hazard ratio 0.93, 95% confidence interval 0.81 - 1.06). No significant interaction was observed between treatment arm and HER2 status for iDFS (p = 0.43). Similar results were obtained for DRFS and OS. CONCLUSIONS: In this large, prospective, global patient cohort, no differences were observed in clinical parameters, prognosis, or differential benefit from palbociclib between HER2-0 and HER2-low tumors. Significant geographic variability was observed in the prevalence of HER2-low status, suggesting a high degree of variation in pathologic assessment of HER2 expression without impact on outcomes.

Ultrasound-based radiomics nomogram for predicting HER2-low expression breast cancer.

Purpose: Accurate preoperative identification of Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) low expression breast cancer (BC) is critical for clinical decision-making. Our aim was to use machine learning methods to develop and validate an ultrasound-based radiomics nomogram for predicting HER2-low expression in BC. Methods: In this retrospective study, 222 patients (108 HER2-0 expression and 114 HER2-low expression) with BC were included. The enrolled patients were randomly divided into a training cohort and a test cohort with a ratio of 8:2. The tumor region of interest was manually delineated from ultrasound image, and radiomics features were subsequently extracted. The features underwent dimension reduction using the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) algorithm, and rad-score were calculated. Five machine learning algorithms were applied for training, and the algorithm demonstrating the best performance was selected to construct a radiomics (USR) model. Clinical risk factors were integrated with rad-score to construct the prediction model, and a nomogram was plotted. The performance of the nomogram was assessed using receiver operating characteristic curve and decision curve analysis. Results: A total of 480 radiomics features were extracted, out of which 11 were screened out. The majority of the extracted features were wavelet features. Subsequently, the USR model was established, and rad-scores were computed. The nomogram, incorporating rad-score, tumor shape, border, and microcalcification, achieved the best performance in both the training cohort (AUC 0.89; 95%CI 0.836-0.936) and the test cohort (AUC 0.84; 95%CI 0.722-0.958), outperforming both the USR model and clinical model. The calibration curves showed satisfactory consistency, and DCA confirmed the clinical utility of the nomogram. Conclusion: The nomogram model based on ultrasound radiomics exhibited high prediction value for HER2-low BC.

Comparison of clinicopathological characteristics, efficacy of neoadjuvant therapy, and prognosis in HER2-low and HER2-ultralow breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: This study aims to analyze potential differences in clinicopathology, efficacy of neoadjuvant therapy (NAT), and clinical outcome among HER2-null, HER2-ultralow and HER2-low breast cancers. METHODS: Consecutive cases of HER2-negative breast cancer that received NAT were included. They were classified as HER2-null (no staining), HER2-ultralow (incomplete faint staining in ≤ 10% of tumour cells) and HER2-low (HER2-1 + or HER2-2+, in situ hybridisation negative). Subgroup analysis was performed based on the HER2 expression level. RESULTS: Out of 302 patients, 215 (71.19%) were HER2-low, 59 (19.54%) were HER2-ultralow, and 28 (9.27%) were HER2-null. In comparison to the HER2-ultralow group, the HER2-low group exhibited higher expression frequencies of ER (p < 0.001), PR (p < 0.001), and AR (p = 0.004), along with a greater prevalence of the luminal subtype (p < 0.001). The HER2-ultralow group also demonstrated a higher prevalence of lymph node metastasis compared to the HER2-null group (p = 0.026). Varied rates of pathologic complete response (pCR) were observed among the three subgroups: HER2-null, HER2-ultralow, and HER2-low, with rates of 35.71%, 22.03%, and 12.56%, respectively. Only the HER2-low subgroup exhibited a significant difference compared to HER2-null (p = 0.001). Despite variations in pCR rates, the three subgroups exhibited comparable disease-free survival (DFS) (p = 0.571). Importantly, we found HER2-low patients with better treatment response (RCB-0/I) exhibited significantly better DFS than those with significant residual disease (RCB-II/III) (P = 0.036). The overall rate of HER2 immunohistochemical score discordance was 45.24%, mostly driven by the conversion between HER2-0 and HER2-low phenotype. Notably, 32.19% of cases initially classified as HER2-0 phenotype on baseline biopsy were later reclassified as HER2-low after neoadjuvant therapy, and it is noteworthy that 22 out of these cases (78.57%) originally had an HER2-ultralow status in the pretreatment biopsy sample. CONCLUSIONS: Our results demonstrate the distinct clinicopathological features of HER2-low and HER2-ultralow breast tumors and confirm that RCB is an effective predictor of prognosis in HER2-low populations for the first time. Notably, our findings demonstrate high instability in both HER2-low and HER2-ultralow expression from the primary baseline biopsy to residual disease after NAT. Furthermore, this study is the first to investigate the clinicopathological feature and the effectiveness of NAT for HER2-ultralow breast cancer.

Complete response to disitamab vedotin in HER2-low metastatic endometrial carcinoma: a case report and review of the literature.

Endometrial cancer (EC) is one of the most common gynecologic malignancies with increasing morbidity. The prognosis for patients diagnosed with early-stage EC remains favorable; however, for patients with recurrent or metastatic EC, the prognosis is poor and treatment options, until recently, are limited. Antibody drug conjugates (ADCs) represent innovative strategies in cancer treatment; however, there are less investigations regarding their efficacy in EC. This report describes an EC case with low human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) immunohistochemistry (IHC) expression score (IHC 2+) that experienced recurrent metastasis in the abdominal and peritoneal following post-surgical chemotherapy and radiotherapy. Subsequently, the commencement of HER2-targeted ADC, disitamab vedotin (RC48; 2.5 mg/kg), administered intravenously every two weeks, was initiated. The tumor lesions shrunk markedly after three cycles of treatment and disappeared by the completion of ten cycles of therapy. The patient is still in remission at present. The current findings imply the potential efficacy of HER2-targeted ADCs for patients with HER2-low metastatic EC.

Stable or at least once HER2-low status during neoadjuvant chemotherapy confers survival benefit in patients with breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: Temporal heterogeneity in human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) status may be associated with the prognosis of breast cancer. We aimed to clarify the relationship of HER2-low transition during neoadjuvant therapy with survival outcomes under the new classification of HER2 status. METHODS: This retrospective study was conducted based on the prospective database of breast cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant therapy from September 2013 to August 2020. RESULTS: This analysis enrolled 185 patients, including 44 patients with HER2-zero tumours, 93 patients with HER2-low tumours and 48 patients with HER2-positive tumours after neoadjuvant therapy. Nearly, 57.6% of HER2-zero tumours turned into HER2-low tumours after neoadjuvant therapy, while 25.0% of HER2-low patients changed to HER2-zero or HER2-positive tumours. We found that at least once diagnosis as HER2-low breast cancer was related to hormone receptor status (p < .001) and Ki-67 expression (p = .036). Patients ever diagnosed as HER2-low tumours had favourable clinicopathological features (less Ki-67 expression, lower pathological staging, etc.) as well as significantly better locoregional relapse-free survival (LRFS; p = .007) and overall survival (OS; p = .026) compared with those never exhibiting HER2-low expression. Furthermore, the 6-year OS rates were 94.2% (95% confidence interval (CI) 83.1-98.1), 88.7% (74.4-95.2) and 78.1% (65.4-86.6) for patients with stable, once and none HER2-low expression, respectively (adjusted HR, 0.514 [95%CI, 0.294-0.897], p = .019). CONCLUSIONS: Our study first indicated in patients across all expression levels of HER2 that stable or at least once HER2-low status may confer favourable attributes including less malignant biological behaviour and long-term survival benefit for breast cancer receiving neoadjuvant therapy.

Stable or at least once HER2-low status may confer favourable attributes including less malignant biological behaviour and long-term survival benefit for breast cancer receiving neoadjuvant therapy.HER2-low expression was highly instable during disease evolution from primary lesion to residual tumour and was associated with hormone receptor status, which warrants HER2 re-test in residual lesion, especially for patients with HER2-zero disease at initial diagnosis, so as to give a clear picture of not only prognostic significance but also treatment availability.

A therapeutic algorithm guiding subsequent therapy selection after CDK4/6 inhibitors' failure: a review of current and investigational treatment for HR+/Her2- breast cancer.

The first-line combination therapies utilizing cyclin-dependent kinase 4 and 6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i) with endocrine therapy (ET) have significantly impacted the course of hormone receptor positive (HR+)/Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 negative (HER2-) advanced breast cancer (ABC). However, resistance often emerges, leading to a molecularly different disease. Estrogen receptor one (ESR1) gene mutations, driving resistance to aromatase inhibitors (AIs), may guide the use of fulvestrant or emerging oral selective estrogen receptor degraders (SERDs) like elacestrant. The dynamic nature of ESR1 mutations suggests potential guidance for continuing CDK4/6i therapy beyond progression. Targeting mutations like breast cancer gene 1 and 2 (BRCA 1/2) with Poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors or the PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway provides therapeutic options. The advent of antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) like trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) and novel agents targeting Trophoblast cell surface antigen-2 (Trop-2) introduces further complexity, underscoring the need for early intervention targeting specific genomic alterations in metastatic BC.

Discordance of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-low status between breast primary and distant metastases with clinical-pathological correlation.

AIMS: Breast cancer with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) immunohistochemistry (IHC) 1+ or 2+ with negative in-situ hybridisation (ISH) (HER2-low) can now be targeted by HER2 antibody drug conjugates. We set out to compare HER2 status between matched primary invasive breast carcinoma (IBC) and distant metastases (DM) with clinical-pathological correlation, with specific interest in HER2-low. METHODS: Biomarker studies and clinical-pathological features of primary IBC with matched DM diagnosed between 2021 and 2022 were retrospectively analysed. HER2 status was assessed per 2023 American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists (ASCO/CAP) guidelines for IHC (4B5) and ISH (IQFISH pharmDX). Bilateral breast primaries were excluded. HER2 IHC 0 to 1+ were reassessed. RESULTS: One hundred and forty-seven cases of primary IBC with matched DM were identified. Biomarkers were performed on core biopsy (n = 74) and resection (n = 73). One hundred and twenty-six (86%) were initially classified as 'HER2-negative'; of these, 67 (46%) were reclassified as HER2-low. Patients with HER2-positive primaries were younger (P = 0.01) and had an increased incidence of micropapillary carcinoma (P = 0.02). HER2-low primaries also had an increased incidence of micropapillary carcinoma (P = 0.02) and oestrogen receptor (ER) positivity (P = 0.02) compared to HER2 0. One hundred and sixty-nine matched DM cases excluding bone metastasis were identified (range = one to seven metastases per IBC). The most common sites of metastases were liver (50 of 169, 30%), lung (36 of 169; 21%), distant lymph node (26 of 169, 15%); 138 DM cases (82%) were previously classified as 'HER2-negative', and 62 (37%) were reclassified as HER2-low. Like HER2-low primaries, HER2-low metastases were frequently ER-positive (52 of 62; 84%) (P = 0.02). Brain metastases were more frequently HER2-positive (five of 32; 16%) (P = 0.04). Comparing HER2 status in matched primaries and DM, HER2 status was discordant in 62 cases (37%). Most changes occurred from HER2-low to HER2 0 (33 of 169, 20%), HER2 0 to HER2-low (17 of 169, 10%) and HER2-low to positive (10 of 169, 6%). All HER2-low to HER2 0 changes were HER2 1+ to 0. In 30 patients with multiple DM sites (47 cases), HER2 status among different DM samples was discordant in 16 patients (53%), mainly from HER2-low to HER2 0 (16 of 47, 34%). CONCLUSION: A significant proportion of previous 'HER2-negative' primaries and DM cases were reclassified as HER2-low. Discordant HER2 status between IBC primary and metastasis and between different DM sites demonstrated tumour heterogeneity and highlights the need for HER2 retesting in distant metastasis.

The impact of HER2-low status on pathological complete response and disease-free survival in early-stage breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: The HER-2 status of breast cancer (BC) has been classified as negative or positive for a long time. Given the efficacy of novel anti-HER2-targeted antibody drug conjugates (ADCs) in HER2-low BC, a distinct subgroup of HER2-low tumors has emerged within BC. The biology and prognostic impact of HER2-low expression are not yet well defined, and inconsistent results were reported. This study aims to evaluate the impact of low HER-2 status on the response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) and disease- free survival (DFS) rates. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed BC patients treated with NACT from 2017 to 2023 in two cancer centers. HER2-negative patients were included. HER-2 low status was defined by IHC + 1 or + 2/ISH non-amplified, and HER2-zero was defined by IHC 0. Pathological complete response (pCR) rates and DFS between HER2-low and HER2-zero populations were compared. RESULTS: 170 patients were identified. 122 (72%) of these patients were HER2- zero BC, whereas 48 (28%) were HER2-low BC. Overall, pCR was achieved in 35 (20.5%) patients. Of these, pCR was observed in 30 patients (44.6%) from the HER2- zero group, compared to 5 patients (10.4%) from the HER2-low group (p = 0.046), but significance was lost in multivariate analysis. Among the hormone receptor (HR) positive subtype, pCR was achieved 19.8% of HER2-zero tumors and 7.5% of HER2-low tumors (p = 0.08). For HR-negative subtype 34.1% HER2-zero tumors had pCR and 25% of the HER2-low tumors had pCR (p = 0.614). There was no association between DFS and HER2-low status. CONCLUSIONS: Our study indicates that HER2-low status had no impact on pCR or DFS.

Deciphering HER2-low breast cancer (BC): insights from real-world data in early stage breast cancer.

Background: Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-low has emerged as a potential new entity in breast cancer (BC). Data on this subset are limited, and prognostic results are controversial, evidencing the need of further data in a BC real-world cohort. Methods: Patients with HER2-negative stage I-III BC diagnosed between 2006 and 2016 were retrospectively reviewed in a single cohort from the Catalan Institute of Oncology Badalona. Demographics and clinicopathological characteristics were examined via medical charts/electronic health records. We aim to describe and compare HER2-0/HER2-low populations through Chi-square or Fisher test, and explore its prognostic impact using Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox regression models. Results: From a cohort of 1755 BC patients, 1401 invasive HER2-negative, stage I-III cases were evaluated. 87% were hormone receptor (HR)-positive versus 13% triple negative (TNBC). Overall, 43% were HER2-0 and 57% HER2-low (61% immunohistochemistry (IHC) 1+ and 39% IHC 2+). Comparing HER2-low versus HER2-0, HER2-low showed higher proportion of estrogen receptor (ER)-positive (91.6% vs 79.9%, p ⩽ 0.001) and progesterone receptor (PR)-positive (79.8% vs 68.9%, p ⩽ 0.001) cases. HER2-0 exhibited higher proportion of TNBC (20.1% vs 8.4%, p = 0.001), grade III tumors (28.8% vs 23.5%, p = 0.039), and higher Ki67 median value (26.47% vs 23.88%, p = 0.041). HER2-low was associated with longer time to distant recurrence (TTDR) compared to HER2-0 (67.8 vs 54.1 months; p = 0.015) and better BC-related survival (19.2 vs 16.3 years; p = 0.033). In the multivariable analysis, HER2-low was not an independent prognostic factor for TTDR and BC-related survival. ER expression showed a strong association with longer TTDR (Hazard Ratio: 0.425, p ⩽ 0.001) and improved BC-related survival (Hazard Ratio: 0.380, p ⩽ 0.001). PR expression was also associated with longer TTDR (Hazard Ratio: 0.496, p ⩽ 0.001), and improved BC-related survival (Hazard Ratio: 0.488, p ⩽ 0.001). Histological grade III was significantly associated with shorter TTDR (Hazard Ratio: 1.737, p = 0.002). Positive nodal status was the strongest factor correlated with worse BC-related survival (Hazard Ratio: 2.747, p ⩽ 0.001). Conclusion: HER2-low was significantly associated with HR-positive disease, whereas HER2-0 group had higher incidence of TNBC, histological grade III and higher Ki67%. Although HER2-low group was associated with longer TTDR and improved BC-related survival, these findings could be explained by the greater proportion of favorable prognostic features in this subgroup compared to HER2-0.

Evolution and prognostic significance of HER-2 conversion from primary to residual disease in HER-2 negative patients with breast cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

This study aimed to analyze HER-2 zero or HER-2 low conversion in HER-2 negative patients after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) and evaluate its prognostic significance. HER-2 negative patients with breast cancer with residual disease after NAC and paired pre- and post-therapeutic HER-2 testing results were analyzed retrospectively. HER-2 low, defined as immunohistochemistry (IHC) scores of 1+ or 2+/in situ hybridization (ISH), were not amplified. HER-2 zero is defined as an IHC score of 0. A total of 571 patients were enrolled, including primary HER-2 zero (n=201, 35.2%) and HER-2 low (n=370, 64.8%). The overall HER-2 change rate was 32.4%. Multivariable logistic regression showed that patients with hormone receptor-positive status before NAC was significantly associated with the conversion of HER-2 zero to low (OR=3.436, P < 0.0001). The median follow-up time was 50.0 months. In patients who are primary HER-2 zero, HER-2 zero to low was significantly associated with better disease-free survival (DFS) than constant HER-2 zero (HR=0.49, P=0.01) after adjustment (4-year DFS 80.1% vs 55.7%, Log-rank P=0.033). Subgroup analysis revealed that among patients who are primary HER-2 zero with hormone receptor-positive, HER-2 zero to low had a significantly better DFS than constant HER-2 zero (Log-rank P=0.037). In contrast, patients with hormone receptor-negative status did not. In conclusion, almost one-third of patients who are HER-2 negative underwent HER-2 zero or HER-2 low conversion after NAC. HER-2 zero to low conversion was associated with better DFS in patients who are HER-2 zero. These results provide a valuable reference for the potential application of anti-HER-2 ADC in an adjuvant setting for patients with residual disease after NAC.

Prognosis in HR-positive metastatic breast cancer with HER2-low versus HER2-zero treated with CDK4/6 inhibitor and endocrine therapy: a meta-analysis.

Background: The combination of CDK4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i) and endocrine therapy (ET) is currently the standard first-line treatment for patients with metastatic hormone receptor positive (HR+), and HER2-negative (HER2-) breast cancer. However, the impact of HER2 status on the prognosis of patients receiving CDK4/6i and ET remains unclear. The meta-analysis was conducted to evaluate different outcomes between HER2-low and HER2-zero patients in advanced HR+ breast cancer receiving CDK4/6i and ET. Methods: A systematic search was performed in PubMed and EMBASE databases for relevant published literature. Objective response rate (ORR), overall survival (OS), and progression-free survival (PFS) were pooled by fixed or random effects models. Results: Overall, 12 studies with 3567 patients were eligible for analysis. The pooled analysis suggested that no significant differences were observed in terms of ORR and OS between HER2-low and HER2-zero patients who underwent CDK4/6i and ET. Similarly, no significant difference in PFS was found between HER2-low and HER2-zero patients who underwent post-line CDK4/6i and ET or first-line Palbociclib and ET. However, in patients who received mixed-line (not a single treatment line) or first-line CDK4/6i and ET, the PFS was significantly shorter in the HER2-low subgroup than in the HER2-zero subgroup (mixed-line: HR = 1.36; 95% CI = 1.11-1.65; P = 0.002; first-line: HR = 1.14; 95% CI = 1.01-1.28; P = 0.04). A similar phenomenon was observed in patients who received mixed-line or post-line Palbociclib and ET (mixed-line: HR = 1.60; 95% CI = 1.09-2.34; P = 0.02; post-line: HR = 1.43; 95% CI = 1.03-2.00; P = 0.03). Conclusion: These results indicated that HER2-low status did not have a significant association with ORR and OS, but it may have a worse impact on PFS in patients who received mixed-line or first-line CDK4/6i and ET, as well as mixed-line or post-line palbociclib plus ET.

Unveiling the mysteries of HER2-low expression in breast cancer: pathological response, prognosis, and expression level alterations.

BACKGROUND: The novel anti-HER2 antibody drug conjugates (ADCs) can effectively improve the long-term survival of patients with HER2-low expression breast cancer. However, pathological responses to neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) within HER2-low expression breast cancer, the relationship between pathological response and prognosis and the transformation of HER2 status are all now poorly understood. METHODS: The patients with HER2-0 and HER2-low expression breast cancer receiving NAT at Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital between Jan. 2014 and Nov. 2018 were retrospectively explored. HER2 low expression refers to the IHC 1 + or 2 + and FISH negative. The Kappa test was utilized for analyzing the consistency rate of HER2 expression. To evaluate disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS), this research employed both the Kaplan-Meier analysis and the Cox regression. RESULTS: In this study, 178 patients with HER2-0 and 344 patients with HER2-low expression breast cancer were included. In comparison with the HER2-0 group, it is shown that patients in the HER2-low group have more possibility to be younger compared to those 50 years old (P < 0.014), have more premenopausal patients (P < 0.001), a higher proportion of hormone receptor (HR) positive patients (P < 0.001), and less proportion of stage III V patients (P < 0.034). When NAT was finished, the pCR rate became 23.6% in the HER2-0 group while 22.1% in the HER2-low group, and there was also a higher pCR rate in HR- patients in comparison with that in HR + patients (P < 0.01). Considering HER2 expression inconsistency, the overall HER2 inconsistency rate was 30.4% (Kappa = 0.431, P < 0.01). Among patients initially diagnosed as HER2-0, 34% (N = 61) were re-diagnosed as HER2-low after NAT. After stratification by HR expression status, HR+/HER2-0 patients transformed to HER2-low after NAT in 37%, and 32% of HR- patients changed from HER2-0 to HER2-low. In this survival analysis, there were both better DFS rates (P = 0.009) and OS rates (P = 0.026) in the HR-/HER2-low patients in comparison with the HR-/HER2-0 patients, while the HER2-0 and HER2-low patients in the HR + group had no significant survival difference. Additionally, for non-pCR patients, there was better DFS (P = 0.029) and OS (P = 0.038) in the HER2-low group in comparison with that of the HER2-0 group, while no significant survival difference exists between pCR patients. CONCLUSION: After HR stratification, there are unique clinical characteristics and prognostic outcomes in HER2-low expression breast cancer, which indicates the potential to become a specific molecular subtype of breast cancer. The significant instability of HER2-low expression status between primary tumor and residual invasive disease suggests that multiple detections of HER2 status should be emphasized in NAT strategies.

Characterization of HER2-Low Breast Tumors among a Cohort of Colombian Women.

HER2-low tumors have shown promise in response to antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) in recent clinical trials, underscoring the need to characterize this group's clinical phenotype. In this study, we aimed to explore the clinicopathological features, survival rates, and HER2 amplicon mRNA expression of women affected with HER2-low breast cancer, compared with HER2-negative and HER2-positive groups. We included 516 breast cancer patients from Colombia, for whom we compared clinicopathological features, mRNA expression of three HER2 amplicon genes (ERBB2, GRB7 and MIEN1), survival and risk of mortality between HER2-low cases (1+ or 2+ with negative in situ hybridization (ISH) result) with HER2-positive (3+ or 2+ with positive ISH test) and HER2-negative (0+) cases. A higher proportion of patients with better-differentiated tumors and a lower proliferation index were observed for HER2-low tumors compared to the HER2-positive group. Additionally, HER2-low tumors showed higher mRNA expression of the ERBB2 gene and longer overall survival rates compared to HER2-negative cases. Nonetheless, a Cox-adjusted model by ER status and clinical stage showed no statistically significant differences between these groups. Our results show differences in important clinicopathological features between HER2-low and both HER2-positive and negative tumors. Given this unique phenotype, it is crucial to evaluate the potential advantages of ADC therapies for this emerging subtype of breast cancer.

Analysis of HER2-Low Breast Cancer in Aotearoa New Zealand: A Nationwide Retrospective Cohort Study.

OBJECTIVES: To perform the first national analysis of demographic and clinicopathological features associated with the HER2 positive, HER2-low, and HER2-zero invasive breast cancers in New Zealand. The study will reveal the proportion of women who may benefit from new HER2-targeted antibody drug conjugate (ADC) therapies. METHODS: Utilising data from Te Rehita Mate Utaetae (Breast Cancer Foundation NZ National Register), the study analysed data from women diagnosed with invasive breast cancer over a 21-year period. The HER2 status of tumours was classified into three categories-HER2-zero, HER2-low, HER2-positive. RESULTS: From 2009-2021, 94% of women underwent HER2 testing, with 14% diagnosed with HER2-positive breast cancer. For advanced-stage disease, 38% of those formerly classified as HER2-negative were reclassified as HER2-low. Including HER2-positive breast cancers, this indicates that 60% of women with advanced breast cancer may potentially benefit from the new HER2-directed ADCs (approximately 120 women per year). CONCLUSIONS: The findings suggest a significant proportion of women with invasive breast cancer in New Zealand could benefit from new HER2-targeted treatments. There is a need to standardise HER2 testing to enhance personalised treatment and improve outcomes.

Genomic and transcriptomic landscape of HER2-low breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: Novel agents have expanded the traditional HER2 definitions to include HER2-Low (HER2L) Breast Cancer (BC). We sought to evaluate the distinct molecular characteristics of HER2L BC to understand potential clinical/biologic factors driving resistance and clinical outcomes. METHODS: Retrospective analysis was performed on 13,613 BC samples, tested at Caris Life Sciences via NextGen DNA/RNA Sequencing. BC subtypes were defined by IHC/ISH. CODEai database was used to access clinical outcomes from insurance claims data. RESULTS: Overall, mutational landscape was similar between HER2L and classical subsets of HR+and HRneg cohorts. TP53 mutations were significantly higher in HRneg/HER2L group vs. HR+/HER2L tumors (p<0.001). A higher mutation rate of PIK3CA was observed in HRneg/HER2L tumors compared to TNBC subtype (p=0.016). PD-L1 positivity was elevated in HRneg/HER2L tumors compared to HR+/HER2L tumors, all p<0.01. Patients with HR+/HER2L tumors treated with CDK4/6 inhibitors had similar OS compared to pts with HR+/HER2-0 (HR=0.89, p=0.012). 27.2% of HR+/HER2L pts had activating PIK3CA mutations. Among HR+PIK3CA mutated tumors, HER2L pts treated with alpelisib showed no difference in OS vs. HER2-0 alpelisib-treated pts (HR=1.23, p=0.517). 13.9% of HER2L TNBC pts were PD-L1+. Interestingly, pts with PD-L1+ HER2L/HRneg (TNBC) treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) showed improved OS than HER2-0 TNBC (HR=0.61, p=0.046). CONCLUSION: Our findings expand the understanding of the molecular profile of the HER2L subgroup and comparison to the classically defined breast cancer subgroups. Genomic risk assessments after progression on novel therapeutics can be assessed to better define implications for mechanisms of resistance.

The DEBBRAH trial: Trastuzumab deruxtecan in HER2-positive and HER2-low breast cancer patients with leptomeningeal carcinomatosis.

BACKGROUND: Leptomeningeal disease (LMD) is associated with poor survival and diminished quality of life. Trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) has shown remarkable intracranial and extracranial activity in human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive and HER2-low advanced breast cancer (ABC). The DEBBRAH trial was designed to evaluate its efficacy and safety in patients with HER2-positive and HER2-low ABC with a history of brain metastases (BMs) and/or LMD. Here, we report results from cohort 5, which specifically included patients with pathologically confirmed LMD. METHODS: This single-arm, open-label, five-cohort, phase 2 trial enrolled seven patients in cohort 5 who received 5.4 mg/kg T-DXd intravenously every 21 days until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). Key secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS) and safety profile. FINDINGS: At data cutoff (April 4, 2023), the median duration of follow-up was 12.0 months (range, 2.5-18.6). The median OS was 13.3 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 5.7-NA, p < 0.001), meeting the primary endpoint. The median PFS was 8.9 months (95% CI, 2.1-NA). Two (28.6%) of seven patients remained on treatment after 18.6 and 11.9 months, respectively. Of the five patients who progressed and died, none had intracranial progression or clinical worsening of leptomeningeal symptoms. Notably, 71.4% (95% CI, 29.0-96.3) achieved prolonged stabilization (≥24 weeks) by response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (RECIST) v.1.1. No unexpected safety signals and no treatment-related deaths were observed. CONCLUSIONS: T-DXd showed promising antitumor activity in patients with HER2-positive and HER2-low ABC with previously untreated, pathologically confirmed LMD. These encouraging data warrant further investigation to address the unmet need in this difficult-to-treat condition. FUNDING: This work was funded by Daiichi Sankyo/AstraZeneca. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04420598.