Rates of Acute Brain Injury Among Severely Hypertensive Patients Seen in the Emergency Department.

Background: Identifying patients with acute brain injury among patients who present to the Emergency Department (ED) with severe hypertension can be challenging. We explored rates of brain injury in a cohort of ED patients with severe hypertension in whom acute target-organ damage was or was not initially suspected. Methods: We conducted a retrospective chart-review study at two different hospitals within the same urban health system. Consecutive adult patients seen from 10/1/2020 to 5/1/2022 with a systolic blood pressure ≥180 mmHg or diastolic blood pressure ≥120 mmHg were included. Results: A total of 972 patients met our eligibility criteria. The average age was 59 years (SD: 16.5), 454 (46.7%) were women, and 582 (59.9%) were non-White. A total of 186/972 (19.1%) patients were initially thought to have acute target-organ damage in the ED with 97/186 (52.2%) diagnosed with stroke or TIA. The remaining 786/972 (80.9%) patients were not initially diagnosed with target-organ damage (hypertensive urgency [HU]). Of the 786 patients with HU, a head CT was obtained in 216/786 (27.7%) and brain MRI in 74/786 (9.4%). Of the HU patients with a brain MRI, 23/74 (31.1%) had acute abnormalities; most abnormalities on brain MRI (17/23 [73.9%]) were not seen on preceding head CT. Conclusions: In a multicenter study of ED patients, nearly 1 in 5 patients though to have HU who eventually underwent brain MRI had unexpected acute neurological findings, though brain MR was obtained in only 9%.

Implementation of a clinical pathway for the evaluation of asymptomatic hypertension in the emergency department.

INTRODUCTION: According to the guidelines of the American Heart Association and American College of Emergency Physicians, respectively, there is no indication for immediate lowering of asymptomatic hypertension in the Emergency Department (ED), and no requirement for routine diagnostic testing in these patients. Despite this, asymptomatic hypertension represents a recurring source of referrals for ED evaluation from other healthcare settings, or from patient self-referral, with significant practice variation in the evaluation and treatment of this complaint. METHODS: This is a pre-post study of a pathway to standardize care of patients presenting to a tertiary academic Veteran's Health Administration ED with asymptomatic hypertension. Inclusion criteria were patients with ICD10 codes of hypertension who were confirmed via chart review to have sought care for a complaint of elevated blood pressure readings from 2018 to 2022, with the pathway having been implementing in 2022. Patients were excluded if they had symptoms of possible end organ pathology due to hypertension, such as chest pain, headache, or shortness of breath, or if they were reproductive age women who had not undergone a sterilization procedure. The primary outcome was major adverse cardiovascular event within 30 days of ED visit. Secondary outcomes included: diagnostic tests performed, administration of antihypertensives in the ED, and length of stay. Descriptive statistics and statistical analysis were performed. RESULTS: There were a total of 295 unique patients and 324 patient encounters that met the inclusion/exclusion criteria, with 46 encounters that took place after pathway implementation. There were no major adverse cardiovascular events either before or after pathway implementation. Chest radiographs were reduced from 10 % to 0 % (p = 0.005) after pathway respectively. There were also declines in laboratory testing, EKGs, and administration of oral antihypertensives, but these differences were not statistically significant. At no point did any diagnostic testing identify any previously undiagnosed medical conditions. There were no instances of intravenous hypertensives being given after pathway implementation. Despite the reductions in diagnostic testing, there was no change in ED length of stay for patients with asymptomatic hypertension. CONCLUSION: Our findings redemonstrate that patients presenting to the ED with asymptomatic hypertension are at low risk for short-term complications of hypertension, and that diagnostic testing is low yield in this population. While we were able to achieve reductions in unnecessary testing, further work is needed to educate clinicians and improve adherence to evidence based principles when caring for these patients.

Hypertensive crisis and its predictors in Africa: Systematic review and meta-analysis, 2024.

Introduction: Hypertensive crises are a leading cause of visits to emergency departments, carrying grave health implications. A significant number of patients presenting with these crises have a known history of hypertension. Objective: The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to examine the combined prevalence of hypertensive crises among individuals with either a history of hypertension or unknown status (newly diagnosed with a hypertensive crisis). Methods: This review followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines and was registered with the Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO). Research databases, including PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Africa Index Medicus, Science Direct, HINARI, and Google Scholar, were systematically searched. Study quality was evaluated using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale, while publication bias was explored through Egger's regression test, funnel plots, and sensitivity analyses. Data collection adhered to the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) format. Meta-analysis was performed using STATA version 17, employing the random-effects DerSimonian-Laird model. Results: Amongst the 15 studies analyzed, the application of the random-effects DerSimonian-Laird statistical model indicated that the prevalence of hypertensive crisis was determined to be 9.09 %, with a 95 % confidence interval (CI) ranging from 7.41 % to 10.77 %. Factors such as poor medication adherence (POR 5.00; 95 % CI: 3.61, 6.93), patients with comorbidities (POR 4.73; 95 % CI: 3.29, 6.80), patients with a history of hypertension (POR 5.64; 95 % CI: 4.57, 6.94), patients aged >65 (POR 2.77; 95 % CI: 2.16, 6.59), and excessive alcohol intake (POR 5.01; 95 % CI: 3.82, 6.58) were associated with higher odds of hypertensive crisis. Conclusion: The findings indicate a markedly higher incidence of hypertensive crisis among hospital-presenting patients in Africa. Factors such as medication non-adherence, co-existing comorbidities, historical hypertension, being over 65, and alcohol misuse significantly contribute to this condition. These insights call for a comprehensive healthcare strategy that targets both the management of hypertension and its complications, aiming to improve the overall health outcomes of affected patients.

Sociodemographic predictors of hypertensive crisis in the hospitalized population in the United States.

INTRODUCTION: Hypertensive crisis (HC) encompasses hypertensive emergencies (HE) and urgencies (HU). METHODS: A retrospective analysis of the 2016-2020 National Inpatient Sample was conducted, and all hospitalizations for HC were identified with their ICD-10 codes. A probability estimation of outcomes was calculated by performing multivariable logistic regression analysis, which took confounders into account. Our primary outcomes were SDs of HC. Secondary outcomes were myocardial infarction (MI), stroke, acute kidney injury (AKI), and transient ischemic attack (TIA). RESULTS: The minority populations were more likely than the Whites to be diagnosed with HCs: Black 2.7 (2.6-2.9), Hispanic 1.2 (1.2-1.3), and Asian population 1.4 (1.3-1.5), (p < 0.0001, all). Furthermore, being male 1.1 (1.09-1.2, p < 0.0001), those with 'self-pay' insurance 1.02 (1.01-1.03, p < 0.0001), and those in the <25th percentile of median household income 1.3 (1.2-1.3, p < 0.0001), were more likely to be diagnosed with HCs. The Black population had the highest likelihood of end-organ damage: MI 2.7 (2.6-2.9), Stroke 3.2 (3.1-3.4), AKI 2.4 (2.2-2.5), and TIA 2.8 (2.7-3.0), (p < 0.0001, all), compared to their Caucasian counterpart. CONCLUSIONS: Being of a minority population, male sex, low-income status, and uninsured were associated with a higher likelihood of hypertensive crisis. The black population was the youngest and had the highest risk of hypertensive emergencies. Targeted interventions and healthcare policies should be implemented to address these disparities and enhance patient outcomes.

Uncontrolled hypertension and hypertensive urgency: One-year single-center emergency department experience.

BACKGROUND: The prevalence of uncontrolled hypertension remains a significant concern in public healthcare systems, including daily practices of emergency departments (ED). AIM: We aimed to characterize patients admitted to an ED for elevated blood pressure (BP) and to identify factors leading to hospitalization. METHODS: This retrospective analysis included all patients admitted to an ED in a tertiary hospital in 2022 due to an acute BP rise without hypertensive emergencies. RESULTS: The studied group (n = 570) constituted 1.5% of all ED admissions in 2022. The median age was 67 years (Q1-Q3) (52-75), 68.9% were females. Systolic BP (200 mm Hg [180-212]) and diastolic BP (105 mm Hg [100-115]) at home were higher than during triage (173 mm Hg [160-190] and 95 mm Hg [84-103], respectively [P <0.0001]). Thirty-nine percent of the studied population had taken BP-lowering agents before ED admission (captopril in 91.8% of cases). In the ED, nitrendipine (54.2%), captopril (38.1%), furosemide (16.3%), urapidil (10.0%), and nitroglycerine (1.9%) were administered. Eventually, a median of 140/82 mm Hg BP was reached in the median time of 288 minutes (202-400). Hospitalization was necessary in 5.4% of patients. The need for furosemide or urapidil administration in the ED doubled the risk of hospitalization (OR, 2.0; P <0.01). Before ED admission, only 17.0% of patients received guidelines-recommended single-pill combination therapy, and 17.6% had already visited ED for uncontrolled hypertension (median of 388 days earlier). CONCLUSIONS: Elevated BP is a common reason for admission to the ED. Crucially, improvements in long-term hypertension treatment and education are needed to reduce the number of patients seeking ED care for elevated BP.

Cannabinoid hyperemesis and pheochromocytoma hypertensive urgency: a case report.

BACKGROUND: This report presents a case of cannabinoid-induced hyperemesis syndrome causing repeated violent retching in a patient with a large (8 cm) adrenal pheochromocytoma resulting in hypertensive urgency. CASE PRESENTATION: A 69-year-old white male patient with a previously diagnosed pheochromocytoma presented to the emergency department with nausea and vomiting and was found to have hypertensive urgency. Computed tomography scan did not show any acute abdominal pathology and history was inconsistent with a gastrointestinal etiology. Patient had a history of daily cannabinoid use for many years and repeated self-limited hyperemesis episodes, and thus a diagnosis of cannabinoid-induced hyperemesis syndrome was made. It was concluded that the likely explanation for the hypertensive urgency was from physical compression of his adrenal tumor during the episodes of retching resulting in a catecholamine surge. The patient was given antiemetics and admitted to the intensive care unit for blood pressure management. Blood pressure was initially controlled with phentolamine and a clevidipine infusion, then transitioned to oral doxazosin and phenoxybenzamine. Hyperemesis and abdominal pain resolved after 24 hours, and his blood pressure returned to baseline. The patient was discharged with the recommendation to stop all cannabis use. On follow-up, his blood pressure remained well controlled, and he subsequently underwent adrenalectomy for tumor removal. CONCLUSION: Hyperemesis can cause hypertensive events in patients with pheochromocytoma by increasing abdominal pressure, leading to catecholamine release.

Clinical Profile of Patients with Hypertensive Emergency Referred to a Tertiary Hospital in the Western Cape Province of South Africa.

BACKGROUND: Despite advances in managing hypertension, hypertensive emergencies remain a common indication for emergency room visits. Our study aimed to determine the clinical profile of patients referred with hypertensive emergencies. METHODS: We conducted an observational study involving patients aged ≥18 years referred with hypertensive crisis. A diagnosis of hypertensive emergencies was based on a systolic blood pressure (BP) ≥180 mmHg and/or a diastolic BP ≥110 mmHg, with acute hypertension-mediated organ damage (aHMOD). Patients without evidence of aHMOD were considered hypertensive urgencies. Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy and unconscious patients were excluded from the study. RESULTS: Eighty-two patients were included, comprising 66 (80.5%) with hypertensive emergencies and 16 (19.5%) with hypertensive urgencies. The mean age of patients with hypertensive emergencies was 47.9 (13.2) years, and 66.7% were males. Age, systolic BP, and duration of hypertension were similar in the hypertensive crisis cohort. Most patients with hypertensive emergencies reported nonadherence to medication (78%) or presented de novo without a prior diagnosis of hypertension (36%). Cardiac aHMOD (acute pulmonary edema and myocardial infarction) occurred in 66%, while neurological emergencies (intracranial hemorrhage, ischemic stroke, and hypertensive encephalopathy) occurred in 33.3%. Lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) (P < 0.001), NT-proBNP (P=0.024), and cardiac troponin (P<0.001) were higher in hypertensive emergencies compared to urgencies. LDH did not differ in the subtypes of hypertensive emergencies. CONCLUSION: Cardiovascular and neurological emergencies are the most common hypertensive emergencies. Most patients reported nonadherence to medication or presented de novo without a prior diagnosis of hypertension.

Characteristics and factors associated with hypertensive crisis: a cross-sectional study in patients with hypertension receiving care in a tertiary hospital.

Background: The hypertensive crisis is characterized by poorly controlled hypertension, which can lead to unfavorable outcomes and high utilization. The purpose of this study was to examine the prevalence, clinical characteristics, and factors associated with hypertensive emergency. Material and Methods: This cross-sectional study collected data from the hospital information system that included patients greater than or equal to 18 years who were diagnosed with hypertensive crisis (blood pressure ≥180 and/or 120 mmHg) and receiving care from the primary care unit and emergency department from 2020 to 2022. The prevalence and clinical characteristics of these patients were examined. Multiple logistic regression analysis was used to analyze factors associated with hypertensive emergency. Results: Among 3329 patients with hypertension, 17.33% had a hypertensive crisis (16.64 vs. 0.69%, urgency and emergency types). Most patients were female (63.6%), with a median age of 66 years. Almost half the patients (42.2%) with hypertensive crisis presented without specific symptoms, and the most common presenting symptom was vertigo/dizziness (27.7%). The initial and after treatment blood pressures were 203/98 and 174/91 mmHg. In the hypertensive emergency, the most common end-organ damage was ischemic stroke (33.3%), hemorrhagic stroke (25%), and acute heart failure (20.8%). An oral angiotensin-converting enzyme (57.5%) was the most commonly administered medication. Multiple logistic regression was performed but did not reveal any statistically significant. Conclusion: Our result revealed a high prevalence of hypertensive crises; most were of hypertensive urgency. The most common presenting symptom was vertigo/dizziness. There was no factor significantly associated with the hypertensive emergency in this study. Further studies should explore the cause of the hypertensive crisis to improve care delivery to patients with hypertension.

The burden and management strategies of hypertensive crisis in adult patients presenting to emergency departments of district and regional hospitals in Sub-Saharan Africa.

BACKGROUND: Hypertensive crisis is among the causes of morbidity and mortality in adult patients with hypertension in Sub-Saharan Africa. We aimed to determine the burden, risk factors and describe the management strategies of hypertensive crisis among adult patients seen at emergency departments of district and regional hospitals in Tanzania. METHODS: This was a prospective multicenter longitudinal study which included all 162 district and regional hospitals in Tanzania. It was part of the Tanzania Emergency Care Capacity Survey (TECCS), a large assessment of burden of acute illness and emergency care capacity in Tanzania. Adult patients who presented to emergency departments with blood pressure ≥ 180/110mmHg were enrolled. Demographics, clinical presentation, management, and 24-hours outcomes were recorded using a structured case report form. Descriptive statistics were summarized in frequency and median, while logistic regression was used to evaluate the association between risk factors and presence of hypertensive crisis. RESULTS: We screened 2700 patients and enrolled 169 adults, henceforth proportion of adult patients with hypertensive crisis was 63 per 1000. Median age was 62 years (IQR 50-70 years) and predominantly females, 112 (66.3%). Majority 151(89.3%) were self-referred with two-wheel motorcycle being the commonest 46 (27.2%) mode of arrival to the hospital. Hypertensive emergency was found in over half 96 (56.8%) of the patients with hypertensive crisis, with oral medications administered in more than half of them, 71 (74%) as means to control the high blood pressure, and one-third 33 (34.4%) were discharged home. On multivariate analysis increasing age (AOR 4.53, p < 0.001), use of illicit drug (AOR 4.14, p-0.04) and pre-existing hypertension (AOR 8.1, p < 0.001) were independent risk factors for hypertensive crisis occurrence. CONCLUSION: Hypertensive crisis among adult patients attending district and regional hospitals is common (63 patients per every 1000 patients). Increasing age, use of illicit drug and pre-existing hypertension are independent associated factors for developing hypertensive crisis.

Cardiac Morphology, Function, and Left Ventricular Geometric Pattern in Patients with Hypertensive Crisis: A Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance-Based Study.

(1) Background: Altered cardiac morphology and function are associated with increased risks of adverse cardiac events in hypertension. Our study aimed to assess left ventricular (LV) morphology, geometry, and function using cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging in patients with hypertensive crisis. (2) Methods: Patients with hypertensive crisis underwent CMR imaging at 1.5 Tesla to assess cardiac volume, mass, function, and contrasted study. Left ventricular (LV) function and geometry were defined according to the guideline recommendations. Late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) was qualitatively assessed and classified into ischemic and nonischemic patterns. Predictors of LGE was determined using regression analysis. (3) Results: Eighty-two patients with hypertensive crisis (aged 48.5 ± 13.4 years, and 57% males) underwent CMR imaging. Of these patients, seventy-eight percent were hypertensive emergency and twenty-two percent were urgency. Diastolic blood pressure was higher under hypertensive emergency (p = 0.032). Seventy-nine percent (92% of emergency vs. 59% of urgency, respectively; p = 0.003) had left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH). The most prevalent LV geometry was concentric hypertrophy (52%). Asymmetric LVH occurred in 13 (22%) of the participants after excluding ischemic LGE. Impaired systolic function occurred in 46% of patients, and predominantly involved hypertensive emergency. Nonischemic LGE occurred in 75% of contrasted studies (67.2% in emergency versus 44.4% in urgency, respectively; p < 0.001). Creatinine and LV mass were independently associated with nonischemic LGE. (5) Conclusion: LVH, altered geometry, asymmetric LVH, impaired LV systolic function, and LGE are common under hypertensive crisis. LVH and LGE more commonly occurred under hypertensive emergency. Longitudinal studies are required to determine the prognostic implications of asymmetric LVH and LGE in hypertensive crisis.