Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 2.104
Filtrar
Más filtros

Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Vaccine ; 42(21): 126182, 2024 Aug 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39116486

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: This study was to assess the lot-to-lot consistency, immunogenicity and safety of three manufacturing lots of a quadrivalent inactivated influenza vaccine (IIV4). METHODS: A randomized, double-blind, phase IV clinical trial was conducted in healthy children, adolescents and adults aged 9-59 years in Guizhou Province, China. Eligible participants were enrolled and randomized into three groups in a ratio of 1:1:1 to receive a single dose of one of three manufacturing lots of IIV4. Serum samples were collected before and 28 days after vaccination for hemagglutination inhibition (HI) antibody testing. Safety data were collected for up to 28 days after vaccination. The primary objective was to evaluate the lot-to-lot consistency of immune response as assessed by the geometric mean titer (GMT) of HI antibody at 28 days after vaccination. RESULTS: Between November 27, 2022 and December 18, 2022, 1260 eligible participants were enrolled, with similar participant demographics among groups. Immune responses after vaccination were comparable across groups, with the 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of GMT ratios for all 4 strains falling into the equivalence criterion of (0.67, 1.5). The seroconversion rates (SCRs) and seroprotection rates (SPRs) met the US Center or Biologics Evaluation and Research (CBER) criteria for all strains for each lot (lower limit of 95% CI of SCR ≥ 40% and SPR ≥ 70%). The incidences of solicited and unsolicited adverse reactions were similar among three groups, most of which (91.9%) were mild or moderate in severity. A total of 11 serious adverse events were reported during the study, and all were considered unrelated to vaccination. CONCLUSION: The three manufacturing lots of IIV4 demonstrated consistent immunogenicity. IIV4 can elicit satisfactory immune responses for all four strains and no safety concerns were identified. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: Identifier No. NCT05512494.

2.
Emerg Microbes Infect ; : 2389095, 2024 Aug 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39101691

RESUMEN

Influenza virus infection poses a continual menace to public health. Here, we developed soluble trimeric HA ectodomain vaccines by establishing interprotomer disulfide bonds in the stem region, which effectively preserve the native antigenicity of stem epitopes. The stable trimeric H1 ectodomain proteins exhibited higher thermal stabilities in comparison with unmodified HAs and showed strong binding activities towards a panel of anti-stem cross-reactive antibodies that recognize either interprotomer or intraprotomer epitopes. Negative stain transmission electron microscopy (TEM) analysis revealed the stable trimer architecture of the interprotomer disulfide-stapled WA11#5, NC99#2, and FLD#1 proteins as well as the irregular aggregation of unmodified HA molecules. Immunizations of mice with those trimeric HA ectodomain vaccines formulated with incomplete Freund's adjuvant elicited significantly more potent cross-neutralizing antibody responses and offered broader immuno-protection against lethal infections with heterologous influenza strains compared to unmodified HA proteins. Additionally, the findings of our study indicate that elevated levels of HA stem-specific antibody responses correlate with strengthened cross-protections. Our design strategy has proven effective in trimerizing HA ectodomains derived from both influenza A and B viruses, thereby providing a valuable reference for designing future influenza HA immunogens.

3.
Int J Infect Dis ; : 107202, 2024 Aug 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39122207

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: In order to support policymakers in allocating resources, we aimed to assess vaccine effectiveness (VE) of inactivated influenza vaccines (IIVs) available for Italian adults in the 2023/2024 season. METHODS: A hospital-based test-negative case-control study was conducted in Genoa between mid-October 2023 and mid-April 2024. Adult (≥18 years) inpatients with prescription of a polymerase chain reaction test for influenza were eligible. RESULTS: Of 1,664 adults analyzed, most (82%) of which were ≥65 years, 114 (6.9%) tested positive for influenza A. Most (92%) cases were caused by subclades 6B.1A.5a.2a and 6B.1A.5a.2a.1 of the A(H1N1)pdm09 subtype. In older adults aged ≥65 years vaccination was effective at 51% (95% CI: 8%, 74%) against any influenza A and 49% (95% CI: 2%, 73%) against A(H1N1)pdm09. Compared with non-vaccinated older adults, VE point estimates for the adjuvanted and, especially, high-dose IIVs were higher than those for the standard-dose non-adjuvanted IIV. CONCLUSION: The 2023/2024 seasonal influenza vaccination proved moderately effective in preventing hospitalization for laboratory-confirmed influenza. Being more appropriate for older adults, local policymakers and vaccinating physicians should maximize adoption of the enhanced IIVs.

4.
Hum Vaccin Immunother ; 20(1): 2384180, 2024 Dec 31.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39106971

RESUMEN

During the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, scheduled vaccinations were postponed, mass vaccination programmes were suspended and opportunities for healthcare workers to administer vaccines ad hoc decreased. The aims of this systematic literature review were to determine the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on vaccine confidence, intent and uptake in preexisting routine childhood or adult vaccination programmes, and to identify factors associated with changes in acceptance, intent and uptake of preexisting vaccines. Medline and Embase were searched for studies in Australia, Brazil, Canada, China, Japan, the USA, and European countries, published between 1 January 2021 and 4 August 2022. A complementary gray literature search was conducted between 11 and 13 October 2022, and supplemented with additional gray research in October 2023. In total, 54 citations were included in the review. Study design and geography were heterogeneous. The number of adults who received or intended to receive an influenza or pneumococcal vaccine was higher during the pandemic than in previous seasons (n = 28 studies). In addition, increased acceptance of adult vaccinations was observed during 2020-21 compared with 2019-20 (n = 12 studies). The rates of childhood vaccinations decreased during the COVID-19 pandemic across several countries (n = 11 studies). Factors associated with changes in intention to receive a vaccination, or uptake of influenza vaccine, included previous vaccination, older age, higher perceived risk of contracting COVID-19, anxiety regarding the pandemic and fear of contracting COVID-19. Acceptance and uptake of influenza and pneumococcal vaccines generally increased after onset of the COVID-19 pandemic.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Humanos , COVID-19/prevención & control , COVID-19/epidemiología , Vacunación/psicología , Vacunación/estadística & datos numéricos , Vacunas contra la COVID-19/administración & dosificación , Vacunas contra la COVID-19/inmunología , Adulto , Vacunas contra la Influenza/administración & dosificación , Vacunas contra la Influenza/inmunología , Programas de Inmunización , Niño , SARS-CoV-2/inmunología , Vacilación a la Vacunación/estadística & datos numéricos , Vacilación a la Vacunación/psicología , Vacunas Neumococicas/administración & dosificación , Pandemias/prevención & control , Aceptación de la Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Aceptación de la Atención de Salud/psicología
5.
Clin Infect Dis ; 2024 Aug 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39099085

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: We evaluated co-administration of adjuvanted seasonal quadrivalent influenza vaccine (FLU-aQIV) and respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) prefusion F protein-based vaccine (RSVPreF3 OA) in ≥65-year-olds. METHODS: This phase 3, open-label trial randomized ≥65-year-olds to receive FLU-aQIV and RSVPreF3 OA concomitantly (Co-Ad) or sequentially, 1 month apart (Control). Primary objectives were to demonstrate the non-inferiority of FLU-aQIV and RSVPreF3 OA co-administration versus sequential administration in terms of hemagglutination inhibition (HI) titers for each FLU-aQIV strain and RSV-A and RSV-B neutralization titers, 1 month post-vaccination. Reactogenicity and safety were also assessed. RESULTS: Overall, 1045 participants were vaccinated (Co-Ad: 523; Control: 522). Non-inferiority of FLU-aQIV and RSVPreF3 OA co-administration versus sequential administration was demonstrated in terms of HI titers for the A/Victoria(H1N1), B/Victoria, and B/Yamagata influenza strains and RSV-A neutralization titers (upper limits [ULs] of 95% confidence intervals [CIs] for adjusted geometric mean titer [GMT] ratios [Control/Co-Ad] ≤1.50) but not for A/Darwin(H3N2) HI titers (95% CI UL = 1.53). The immune response to A/Darwin(H3N2) was further assessed post-hoc using a microneutralization assay; the post-vaccination adjusted GMT ratio (Control/Co-Ad) was 1.23 (95% CI: 1.06-1.42, ie, UL ≤1.50), suggesting an adequate immune response to A/Darwin(H3N2) following co-administration. RSV-B neutralization titers were comparable between groups (95% CI UL for adjusted GMT ratio ≤1.50). Solicited adverse events were mostly mild or moderate and transient; unsolicited and serious adverse event rates were balanced between groups. CONCLUSIONS: Adjuvanted FLU-aQIV and RSVPreF3 OA had acceptable reactogenicity/safety profiles when co-administered in ≥65-year-olds, without clinically relevant interference with the immune responses to either vaccine. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: NCT05568797.

6.
Front Public Health ; 12: 1409004, 2024.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39100958

RESUMEN

Objective: This study aims to analyze the awareness of influenza prevention and control and the behavioral attitudes toward the work among parents and staff in schools in Taicang City and the impact of the vaccination rate among students on influenza outbreaks in schools. The findings can provide references for the development of effective control strategies for the spread of influenza. Methods: An anonymous questionnaire survey was conducted on 10,962 students from 20 schools in Taicang City, with class as the unit of analysis. The survey investigated their awareness of influenza prevention and control, their attitudes, and the vaccination coverage. Results: From January to June 2023, a total of 388 influenza outbreaks were reported in schools in Taicang City, involving 77 schools. There were 3,475 confirmed cases, with an average infection rate of 18.53%. In schools where influenza outbreaks had occurred, the incidence rate of those who received influenza vaccine was significantly lower than those who did not, and the vaccine protection rate was 28.22%. The knowledge awareness rates of "the main transmission routes of influenza" and "influenza vaccination can prevent influenza" among parents of students were 95.49 and 93.16%, respectively. The differences between schools involved in the epidemic and non-epidemic were statistically significant (p < 0.05). The correct attitudes of parents toward "actively reporting relevant symptoms to teachers when their children show symptoms" and "avoiding classes with diseases when their children are suspected to be sick" are 98.80 and 96.26%, respectively. The differences between schools with and without epidemic are statistically significant (p < 0.05). The correct attitudes of the class teacher toward "correct management and control of students with flu like symptoms in the class" and "taking correct prevention and control measures in the event of a flu epidemic in the class" were 89.36 and 92.55%, respectively. The differences between epidemic related and non-epidemic related classes were statistically significant (p < 0.05). Conclusion: Enhance the knowledge level of influenza prevention and control among parents of students, Strengthening the training for class teachers in emergency response to infectious diseases and increasing vaccination coverage among students can effectively reduce the incidence of influenza and thereby the occurrence of cluster outbreaks in schools.


Asunto(s)
Brotes de Enfermedades , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Gripe Humana , Instituciones Académicas , Humanos , Gripe Humana/epidemiología , Gripe Humana/prevención & control , China/epidemiología , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Masculino , Femenino , Niño , Estudiantes/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudiantes/psicología , Padres/psicología , Vacunas contra la Influenza/administración & dosificación , Adolescente , Vacunación/estadística & datos numéricos
7.
Hum Vaccin Immunother ; 20(1): 2370999, 2024 Dec 31.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38957901

RESUMEN

In 2020-21, during the COVID-19 pandemic, a free influenza vaccination program was initiated among the elderly residents in Ningbo, China. The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic and free vaccination policy on influenza vaccine uptake needs to be evaluated. The influenza vaccine uptake among individuals born before 31 December, 1962 from 2017-18 to 2022-23 season in Ningbo was analyzed. Multivariate logistic regressions were used to estimate the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic and free vaccination policy. Our analysis included an average of 1,856,565 individuals each year. Influenza vaccination coverage increased from 1.14% in 2017-18 to 33.41% in 2022-23. The vaccination coverage among the free policy target population was 50.03% in 2022-23. Multivariate analysis showed that free vaccination policy increased influenza vaccine uptake most (OR = 11.99, 95%CI: 11.87-12.11). The initial phase of the pandemic was associated with a positive effect on influenza vaccination (OR = 2.09, 95%CI: 2.07-2.12), but followed by a negative effect in the subsequent two seasons(2021-22: OR = 0.75, 95%CI: 0.73-0.76; 2022-23: OR = 0.40, 95%CI: 0.39-0.40). COVID-19 vaccination in the current season was a positive predictor of influenza vaccine uptake while not completing booster COVID-19 vaccination before was negative predictor in 2022-23. Having influenza vaccine history and having ILI medical history during the last season were also positive predictors of influenza vaccine uptake. Free vaccination policies have enhanced influenza vaccination coverage among elderly population. The COVID-19 pandemic plays different roles in different seasons. Our study highlights the need for how to implement free vaccination policies targeting vulnerable groups with low vaccination coverage.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Vacunas contra la Influenza , Gripe Humana , Cobertura de Vacunación , Humanos , China/epidemiología , Vacunas contra la Influenza/administración & dosificación , COVID-19/prevención & control , COVID-19/epidemiología , Anciano , Gripe Humana/prevención & control , Cobertura de Vacunación/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Femenino , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Vacunación/estadística & datos numéricos , Programas de Inmunización/estadística & datos numéricos , Estaciones del Año , Política de Salud , Pandemias/prevención & control , Persona de Mediana Edad
8.
J Infect Dis ; 2024 Jul 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38970327

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: A single-dose investigational respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) vaccine, RSV prefusion protein F3 (RSVPreF3), was co-administered with a single-dose quadrivalent influenza vaccine (FLU-D-QIV) in a phase 3, randomized, controlled, multicenter study in healthy, non-pregnant women aged 18-49 years. METHODS: The study was observer-blind to evaluate the lot-to-lot consistency of RSVPreF3, and single-blind to evaluate the immune response, safety, and reactogenicity of RSVPreF3 co-administered with FLU-D-QIV. RESULTS: A total of 1415 participants were included in the per-protocol set. There was a robust immune response at day 31 across each of the 3 RSVPreF3 vaccine lots; adjusted geometric mean concentration ratios (95% confidence interval [CI]) were 1.01 (0.91, 1.12), 0.93 (0.84, 1.03), and 0.92 (0.83, 1.02) for RSV1/RSV2, RSV1/RSV3, and RSV2/RSV3, respectively. For FLU-D-QIV co-administered with RSVPreF3, versus FLU-D-QIV alone at day 31, noninferiority was satisfied for 3 of 4 strains assessed, with the lower limit of the 95% CI for geometric mean ratio >0.67. CONCLUSIONS: Immunogenic consistency was demonstrated for 3 separate lots of RSVPreF3. Immunogenic noninferiority was demonstrated when comparing FLU-D-QIV administered alone, versus co-administered with RSVPreF3, for 3 strains of FLU-D-QIV. Co-administration was well tolerated, and both vaccines had clinically acceptable safety and reactogenicity profiles. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: NCT05045144; EudraCT, 2021-000357-26.


This was a phase 3 study that compared antibodies against respiratory syncytial virus (or RSV for short) between women who were given 3 different production batches of RSV prefusion protein F3 (known as RSVPreF3) vaccine. The study also compared the antibodies between women who received either an RSV vaccine together with a flu vaccine (known as FLU-D-QIV), or a flu vaccine alone. The flu vaccine contained 4 different strains of flu virus. The study involved 1415 healthy, non-pregnant women aged 18­49 years. The antibodies checked after 31 days showed strong immune responses for all 3 RSV vaccine production batches, and similar immune responses between each of the 3 RSV vaccine production batches. The immune response of 3 of the 4 flu strains was not less when the flu vaccine was given together with the RSV vaccine than the immune response when flu vaccine was given alone and both vaccines were well tolerated.

9.
Vaccine ; 2024 Jul 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38971665

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) uses the Evidence to Recommendations Framework that includes cost-effectiveness analyses (CEA) for determining vaccine recommendations. ACIP's preference for protecting adults ≥ 65 years is enhanced vaccines, including recombinant influenza vaccine (RIV4), adjuvanted or high dose influenza vaccine. Less is known about the CEA of enhanced vaccines for younger adults. METHODS: We used decision analysis modeling from a societal perspective to determine the cost-effectiveness, measured in quality adjusted life years (QALYs), of RIV4 compared with standard dose quadrivalent influenza vaccine (SD-IIV4) in adults 18-64 years old. Model inputs included 2018-2020 vaccine effectiveness (VE) estimates based on medical record data from a large local health system, 2019-2020 national vaccination and influenza epidemic parameters, with costs and population distributions fitted to the season. RESULTS: Among adults ages 18-64 years, RIV4 cost $94,186/QALY gained, compared to SD-IIV4. Among those 50-64 years old, RIV4 was relatively more cost-effective ($61,329/QALY gained). Cost-effectiveness estimates for 18-64-year-olds were sensitive to the absolute difference in VE between SD-IIV4 and RIV4, among other parameters. Use of RIV4 in 18-64-year-olds would result in fewer cases (669,984), outpatient visits (261,293), hospitalizations (20,046) and deaths (1,018) annually. The majority (59 %; 597 of 1018) of the decreases in deaths occurred in the 50-64-year-olds. CONCLUSIONS: While RIV4 was effective and cost-effective relative to SD-IIV4 for both 50-64-year-old and 18-64-year-old adults, cost-effectiveness was sensitive to small changes in parameters among 18-64-year-olds. Because substantial public health benefits occur with enhanced vaccines, health systems and policy makers may opt for preferential product use in select age/risk groups (e.g., 50-64 year olds) to maximize their cost-benefit ratios.

10.
Hum Vaccin Immunother ; 20(1): 2370087, 2024 Dec 31.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38982712

RESUMEN

The immune response to inactivated influenza vaccines (IIV) is influenced by multiple factors, including hemagglutinin content and egg-based manufacturing. Only two US-licensed vaccines are manufactured without egg passage: cell culture-based inactivated vaccine (ccIIV) and recombinant vaccine (RIV). We conducted a randomized open-label trial in central Wisconsin during the 2018-19 and 2019-20 seasons to compare immunogenicity of sequential vaccination. Participants 18-64 years old were randomized 1:1:1 to receive RIV, ccIIV or IIV in strata defined by number of influenza vaccine doses in the prior 3 years. They were revaccinated with the same product in year two. Paired serum samples were tested by hemagglutination inhibition against egg-adapted and cell-grown vaccine viruses. Serologic endpoints included geometric mean titer (GMT), mean fold rise, and percent seroconversion. There were 373 participants randomized and vaccinated in 2018-19; 332 were revaccinated in 2019-20. In 2018-19, RIV and ccIIV were not more immunogenic than IIV against A/H1N1. The post-vaccination GMT against the cell-grown 3C.2a A/H3N2 vaccine virus was higher for RIV vs IIV (p = .001) and RIV vs ccIIV (p = .001). The antibody response to influenza B viruses was similar across study arms. In 2019-20, GMT against the cell-grown 3C.3a A/H3N2 vaccine virus was higher for RIV vs IIV (p = .03) and for RIV vs ccIIV (p = .001). RIV revaccination generated significantly greater backboosting to the antigenically distinct 3C.2a A/H3N2 virus (2018-19 vaccine strain) compared to ccIIV or IIV. This study adds to the evidence that RIV elicits a superior immunologic response against A/H3N2 viruses compared to other licensed influenza vaccine products.


Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Antivirales , Pruebas de Inhibición de Hemaglutinación , Subtipo H1N1 del Virus de la Influenza A , Vacunas contra la Influenza , Gripe Humana , Vacunas de Productos Inactivados , Vacunas Sintéticas , Humanos , Vacunas contra la Influenza/inmunología , Vacunas contra la Influenza/administración & dosificación , Adulto , Anticuerpos Antivirales/sangre , Adulto Joven , Gripe Humana/prevención & control , Gripe Humana/inmunología , Femenino , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Vacunas de Productos Inactivados/inmunología , Vacunas de Productos Inactivados/administración & dosificación , Adolescente , Subtipo H1N1 del Virus de la Influenza A/inmunología , Vacunas Sintéticas/inmunología , Vacunas Sintéticas/administración & dosificación , Subtipo H3N2 del Virus de la Influenza A/inmunología , Wisconsin , Vacunación/métodos , Virus de la Influenza B/inmunología , Inmunogenicidad Vacunal , Técnicas de Cultivo de Célula , Estados Unidos , Formación de Anticuerpos/inmunología , Inmunización Secundaria/métodos , Huevos
11.
Vaccines (Basel) ; 12(7)2024 Jun 23.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39066341

RESUMEN

Vaccination with transiently activated replication-competent controlled herpesviruses (RCCVs) expressing influenza A virus hemagglutinins broadly protects mice against lethal influenza virus challenges. The non-replicating RCCVs can be activated to transiently replicate with high efficiency. Activation involves a brief heat treatment to the epidermal administration site in the presence of a drug. The drug co-control is intended as a block to inadvertent reactivation in the nervous system and, secondarily, viremia under adverse conditions. While the broad protective effects observed raise an expectation that RCCVs may be developed as universal flu vaccines, the need for administering a co-activating drug may dampen enthusiasm for such a development. To replace the drug co-control, we isolated keratin gene promoters that were active in skin cells but inactive in nerve cells and other cells in vitro. In a mouse model of lethal central nervous system (CNS) infection, the administration of a recombinant that had the promoter of the infected cell protein 8 (ICP8) gene of a wild-type herpes simplex virus 1 (HSV-1) strain replaced by a keratin promoter did not result in any clinical signs, even at doses of 500 times wild-type virus LD50. Replication of the recombinant was undetectable in brain homogenates. Second-generation RCCVs expressing a subtype H1 hemagglutinin (HA) were generated in which the infected cell protein 4 (ICP4) genes were controlled by a heat switch and the ICP8 gene by the keratin promoter. In mice, these RCCVs replicated efficiently and in a heat-controlled fashion in the epidermal administration site. Immunization with the activated RCCVs induced robust neutralizing antibody responses against influenza viruses and protected against heterologous and cross-group influenza virus challenges.

12.
Vaccines (Basel) ; 12(7)2024 Jul 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39066381

RESUMEN

Notwithstanding prevalence gaps in micronutrients supporting immune functions, the significance of their deficits/supplementation for the efficacy of vaccines is underinvestigated. Thus, the influence of supplementation combining vitamins C and D, zinc, selenium, manganese, and N-acetyl cysteine on immune correlates/surrogates of protection conferred by a quadrivalent influenza vaccine (QIV) in mice was investigated. The supplementation starting 5 days before the first of two QIV injections given 28 days apart increased the serum titres of total and neutralizing IgG against each of four influenza strains from QIV. Accordingly, the frequencies of germinal center B cells, follicular CD4+ T helper (Th) cells, and IL-21-producing Th cells increased in secondary lymphoid organs (SLOs). Additionally, the supplementation improved already increased IgG response to the second QIV injection by augmenting not only neutralizing antibody production, but also IgG2a response, which is important for virus clearance, through favoring Th1 differentiation as indicated by Th1 (IFN-γ)/Th2 (IL-4) signature cytokine level ratio upon QIV restimulation in SLO cell cultures. This most likely partly reflected antioxidant action of the supplement as indicated by splenic redox status analyses. Thus, the study provides a solid scientific background for further research aimed at repurposing the use of this safe and inexpensive micronutrient combination to improve response to the influenza vaccine.

13.
Vaccines (Basel) ; 12(7)2024 Jul 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39066403

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: COVID-19 is an infectious disease caused by SARS-CoV-2. It is unclear whether influenza vaccination reduces the severity of disease symptoms. Previous studies have suggested a beneficial effect of influenza vaccination on the severity of COVID-19. The aim of this study was to evaluate the possible protective effect of the influenza vaccine on the occurrence of SARS-CoV-2 infection symptoms and prognosis in patients hospitalized with COVID-19. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study of patients who tested positive for SARS-CoV-2, identified by quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction. Chi-square tests, Kaplan-Meier analysis, and multivariate analysis were performed to assess the association between influenza vaccination and the presence of symptoms in hospitalized patients with COVID-19 and their outcome. RESULTS: In this study, 1712 patients received positive laboratory tests for SARS-CoV-2; influenza vaccination was a protective factor against the presence of characteristic COVID-19 symptoms such as polypnea, anosmia, dysgeusia, and fever (p < 0.001). Influenza-vaccinated patients had fewer days of hospitalization (p = 0.029). CONCLUSIONS: The findings of this study support that influenza vaccination is associated with a decrease in the number of symptoms in patients hospitalized due to COVID-19, with fewer days of hospitalization, but not with the outcome of disease.

14.
Vaccines (Basel) ; 12(7)2024 Jul 13.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39066406

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Despite substantial evidence demonstrating the effectiveness of influenza vaccines, only 38.6% of the adult United States population received an influenza vaccine during the 2023-2024 flu season. Vaccination rates are typically lower among U.S. minority groups, and in 2022, pregnant persons from U.S. minority racial and ethnic groups showed a decrease in influenza vaccine coverage. METHODS: A survey was conducted with residents of Yakima County, Washington, which is home to one of the state's largest percentages of people who identify as Hispanic or Latino/a. The objective was to evaluate the uptake of influenza vaccine among pregnant persons. Surveys were sent to a random sample of 3000 residential mailing addresses. Of the 500 respondents, 244 (52.1%) reported that they had been pregnant, with those identifying as Hispanic or Latino/a constituting 23.8% of this total. Only 62 (26.2%) reported being immunized against influenza during pregnancy. Respondents who were immunized against influenza chose to be vaccinated to protect themselves from the flu (85.5%, n = 53); because a healthcare provider recommended getting vaccinated (85.5%, n = 53); to protect the baby from the flu (82.3%, n = 51); because it was available for free or low cost (62.9%, n = 39); and because vaccination was convenient (54.8%, n = 34). Qualitative evaluation identified that participants who were not vaccinated against influenza during pregnancy believed the vaccination was not needed, was not recommended by a healthcare provider, was difficult to access, they were against vaccination in general, or they were concerned about the safety and ingredients of the vaccine. CONCLUSION: Barriers to vaccination identified in this study included vaccine distrust, lack of awareness, and concerns about vaccine efficacy and safety. Healthcare providers can help address these concerns by providing education and recommendations about the importance of influenza vaccination during pregnancy.

15.
Vaccines (Basel) ; 12(7)2024 Jul 21.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39066447

RESUMEN

Vaccine immunogenicity and reactogenicity depend on recipient and vaccine characteristics. We hypothesized that healthy adults reporting higher reactogenicity from seasonal inactivated influenza vaccine (IIV) developed higher antibody titers compared with those reporting lower reactogenicity. We performed a secondary analysis of a randomized phase 1 trial of a trivalent IIV delivered by microneedle patch (MNP) or intramuscular (IM) injection. We created composite reactogenicity scores as exposure variables and used hemagglutination inhibition (HAI) titers as outcome variables. We used mixed-model analysis of variance to estimate geometric mean titers (GMTs) and titer fold change and modified Poisson generalized estimating equations to estimate risk ratios of seroprotection and seroconversion. Estimates of H3N2 GMTs were associated with the Systemic and Local scores among the IM group. Within the IM group, those with high reaction scores had lower baseline H3N2 GMTs and twice the titer fold change by day 28. Those with high Local scores had a greater probability of seroconversion. These results suggest that heightened reactogenicity to IM IIV is related to low baseline humoral immunity to an included antigen. Participants with greater reactogenicity developed greater titer fold change after 4 weeks, although the response magnitude was similar or lower compared with low-reactogenicity participants.

16.
Public Health ; 235: 71-75, 2024 Jul 27.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39068775

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: This manuscript offers an in-depth comparative examination of the effectiveness of higher-dose (double standard-dose and high-dose) influenza vaccines in contrast to a single standard-dose vaccine when it comes to alleviating major cardiovascular events. STUDY DESIGN: Meta-Analysis. METHODS: To conduct this study, an exhaustive search was carried out in the medical English literature using databases such as PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane CENTRAL until 10 April 2024. The evaluation of associations was achieved through the calculation of pooled relative risks (RRs) accompanied by their corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs). RESULTS: A meticulous analysis encompassed a comprehensive cohort of 68,713 patients. Among these participants, 34,430 individuals were randomly assigned to receive a higher-dose influenza vaccination, whereas 34,283 received the standard influenza vaccination. Contrary to initial expectations, a higher-dose influenza vaccine did not manifest elevated efficacy compared to the standard-dose vaccine in terms of mitigating major cardiovascular events. The computed pooled RR stood at 1.0, accompanied by a 95% CI ranging from 0.93 to 1.10. CONCLUSION: While this systematic review and meta-analysis did not find a statistically significant advantage of higher-dose influenza vaccines over a single standard-dose vaccine in preventing major cardiovascular events, the observed trend towards risk reduction warrants continued investigation. These findings contribute to the ongoing dialogue surrounding vaccination strategies and their implications for cardiovascular outcomes.

17.
Infect Dis Ther ; 13(8): 1789-1805, 2024 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38981954

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) and influenza pose major disease burdens in older adults due to an aging immune system and comorbidities; seasonal overlap exists between these infections. In 2023, the RSV prefusion protein F3 older adult (RSVPreF3 OA) vaccine was first approved in the USA as a single dose for prevention of lower respiratory tract disease due to RSV in adults aged ≥ 60 years. The vaccine has since been approved in the European Union and elsewhere. RSVPreF3 OA and FLU-QIV-HD could be coadministered if immunogenicity, safety, and reactogenicity are not affected. METHODS: This open-label, randomized (1:1), controlled, phase 3 study in 1029 adults aged ≥ 65 years in the USA evaluated the immunogenicity (up to 1 month after last vaccine dose) and safety (up to 6 months after last vaccine dose) of RSVPreF3 OA coadministered with FLU-QIV-HD (co-ad group) versus FLU-QIV-HD alone followed by RSVPreF3 OA at a separate visit 1 month later (control group). Non-inferiority criterion was defined as an upper limit of the two-sided 95% confidence interval of the geometric mean titer (GMT) group ratio (control/co-ad) ≤ 1.5. Secondary endpoints included safety and reactogenicity. RESULTS: Proportions of participants across age categories between groups and proportions of male (50.4%) and female (49.6%) participants were well balanced; most participants were white (68.7%). Group GMT ratios for RSV-A neutralizing titers, hemagglutination inhibition titers for four influenza vaccine strains, and RSV-B neutralizing titers were non-inferior in the co-ad group versus the control group. No clinically meaningful differences in local or systemic solicited and unsolicited adverse events (AEs), serious AEs, and potential immune-mediated diseases were identified. The most common solicited AEs in both groups were injection-site pain and myalgia. CONCLUSION: In adults aged ≥ 65 years, coadministration of RSVPreF3 OA and FLU-QIV-HD was immunogenically non-inferior to the sequential administration of both vaccines 1 month apart, and had clinically acceptable safety and reactogenicity profile. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT05559476.


Adults aged 65 years or older are vulnerable to infections caused by influenza and respiratory syncytial viruses, due to an aging immune system and other underlying conditions. Infections with both viruses increase during autumn and winter seasons in temperate climates. In 2023, a vaccine against respiratory syncytial virus, called RSVPreF3 OA, was first approved for use in adults aged 60 years or older in the USA; the vaccine has since also been approved in the European Union and elsewhere. Giving RSVPreF3 OA in the same vaccination visit (coadministration) with a high-dose influenza vaccine, called FLU-QIV-HD, which is given to adults aged 65 years or older, could help protect against both respiratory syncytial virus and influenza. This article reports the results of a phase 3 trial comparing coadministration of the RSVPreF3 OA and FLU-QIV-HD vaccines with sequential administration (FLU-QIV-HD followed by RSVPreF3 OA 1 month later) in 1029 adults aged 65 years or older in the USA. Proportions of participants across age categories between groups, and the proportions of male (50.4%) and female (49.6%) participants were well balanced; most participants were white (68.7%). Immune response to both the vaccines among participants in the coadministration arm was non-inferior to that in the sequential arm. Coadministration was well tolerated, with no meaningful differences in adverse reactions to the vaccines compared with sequential administration. The most common adverse reactions were pain at the injection site and muscle aches. This study supports the coadministration of RSVPreF3 OA and FLU-QIV-HD in adults aged 65 years or older.

18.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39036571

RESUMEN

The influenza vaccine is one of the most commonly administered vaccines worldwide, with a high safety profile. However, rare cases of serious adverse events have been reported in the literature. We report a 77-year-old male who presented with progressive weakness in the lower extremities shortly after receiving the Influenza vaccine. He was diagnosed with myositis involving the paraspinal and bilateral lower extremity muscles. He received treatment with high-dose steroids and taper with full recovery of his muscle weakness. Although the exact causal mechanism between the vaccine and the patient's myositis could not be established, surveillance for such rare adverse events can provide data for future vaccine safety improvement. Due to well-known benefits of the Influenza vaccine that far exceed the potential adverse effects, we strongly encourage the readers to continue their vaccine practices as per CDC guidelines.

19.
Int J Infect Dis ; 146: 107160, 2024 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38969330

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: This study evaluated relative vaccine effectiveness (rVE) of MF59-adjuvanted trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine (aTIV) vs high-dose trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine (HD-TIV) for prevention of test-confirmed influenza emergency department visits and/or inpatient admissions ("ED/IP") and for IP admissions alone pooled across the 2017-2020 influenza seasons. Exploratory individual season analyses were also performed. METHODS: This retrospective test-negative design study included United States (US) adults age ≥65 years vaccinated with aTIV or HD-TIV who presented to an ED or IP setting with acute respiratory or febrile illness during the 2017-2020 influenza seasons. Test-positive cases and test-negative controls were grouped by vaccine received. The rVE of aTIV vs HD-TIV was evaluated using a combination of inverse probability of treatment weighting and logistic regression to adjust for potential confounders. RESULTS: Pooled analyses over the three seasons found no significant differences in the rVE of aTIV vs HD-TIV for prevention of test-confirmed influenza ED/IP (-2.5% [-19.6, 12.2]) visits and admissions or IP admissions alone (-1.6% [-22.5, 15.7]). The exploratory individual season analyses also showed no significant differences. CONCLUSIONS: Evidence from the 2017-2020 influenza seasons indicates aTIV and HD-TIV are comparable for prevention of test-confirmed influenza ED/IP visits in US adults age ≥65 years.


Asunto(s)
Adyuvantes Inmunológicos , Hospitalización , Vacunas contra la Influenza , Gripe Humana , Polisorbatos , Estaciones del Año , Escualeno , Eficacia de las Vacunas , Humanos , Vacunas contra la Influenza/inmunología , Vacunas contra la Influenza/administración & dosificación , Gripe Humana/prevención & control , Gripe Humana/diagnóstico , Gripe Humana/epidemiología , Anciano , Masculino , Femenino , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Polisorbatos/administración & dosificación , Escualeno/administración & dosificación , Adyuvantes Inmunológicos/administración & dosificación , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Vacunas de Productos Inactivados/administración & dosificación , Vacunas de Productos Inactivados/inmunología , Vacunación
20.
Vaccine ; : 126122, 2024 Jul 28.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39074996

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Influenza vaccination may protect through the humoral immune response, cellular immune response, or possibly both. Immunity after vaccination can be mediated through antibodies that may be detected by the rise of serum hemagglutination inhibition (HAI) titers. Our objective was to investigate the proportion of protection against influenza mediated through antibodies by measuring the rise of HAI titer (indirect effect) compared to that induced through other immune mechanisms (direct effect) for influenza A and B. METHODS: We analysed data from a cluster randomized trial conducted during the 2008-2009 season in which Canadian Hutterite children were vaccinated against influenza. We used inverse probability weighting to calculate the indirect and direct effect of vaccination against influenza A/H3N2 and influenza B/Brisbane using HAI titres and overall vaccine efficacy. RESULTS: We included data on 617 children from 46 Hutterite colonies, aged between 3 and 15 years who were vaccinated with either inactivated trivalent influenza vaccine or hepatitis A vaccine. Vaccine efficacy was 63 % for influenza A (H3N2) and 28 % for influenza B. The hazard ratio for protection against influenza A/H3N2 due to an indirect effect of vaccination was 0.96 (95 % confidence interval (CI) of 0.00 to 2.89) while for the direct effect it was 0.38 (95 % CI of 0.00 to 5.47). The hazard ratio for influenza B indirect effect was 0.75 (95 % CI of 0.07 to 1) and for the direct effect 0.96 (95 % CI of 0.00 to 12.02). In contrast, repeating the analysis using microneutralization in a subgroup of 488 children revealed that the protective effect for vaccination for A/H3N2 was entirely mediated by antibodies but only for 13 % for influenza B. CONCLUSIONS: Although vaccination provided higher protective effectiveness against influenza A than B, most of the influenza A vaccine efficacy likely occurred through antibodies other than what could be detected by HAI titres. In contrast, for influenza B, while the HAI titres appeared to mediate most of the vaccine effectiveness, this was not confirmed by microneutralization analysis.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA