Optimization of surgical evaluation algorithms for living donor liver transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) is an established and endorsed alternative for deceased donor liver transplantation with better recipient outcomes. Nevertheless, while extensive evaluation of potential donors is crucial, evaluation algorithms differ between transplant centres and guidelines. METHODS: We included 317 individuals evaluated for LDLT between 07/2007-07/2022 in a retrospective analysis. The evaluation process was analysed to identify the key reasons for declining 77 potential donors. Additionally, 146 donors that underwent LDLT were analysed regarding risk factors for complications. RESULTS: The main reasons for donor refusal were liver volumetry (40.3 %) and metabolic factors including obesity or steatotic liver disease (20.8 %). Contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT) identified 63.6 % of all declined donors; CECT combined with assessment of medical history, physical examination, blood testing and ultrasonography, identified 87.0 % of declined potential donors. Associated with this selection, complication rates in donors were low (≥II in 17.1 %; none with ≥IVb). Notably, higher age was a risk factor for developing a complication ≥II after hemi-hepatectomy (p = 0.0373). CONCLUSIONS: We propose a progressive 4-step evaluation algorithm that begins with a very basic assessment combined with up-front CECT. This early phase of testing is expected to identify nearly 90 % of ineligible donors, thereby conserving critical resources, time and money, as well as minimising burden for potential donors. FUNDING: J.M.W. received funding by grant We-4675/6-1 from the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) in Bonn, Germany.

Fatal Hyperacute Liver Failure due to Varicella Zoster Virus Immediately After Living-Donor Liver Transplantation: A Case Report and Review of the Literature.

BACKGROUND: Although acute hepatitis caused by varicella zoster virus mostly develops in immunocompromised patients, hyperacute liver failure is very rare. To our knowledge, there are no previous reports on liver transplant patients. METHODS: We report the first case of fatal hyperacute liver failure due to varicella zoster virus immediately after living-donor liver transplantation without cutaneous lesions and review the literature. RESULT: The present case exhibited rapid development and progression of acute liver failure from postoperative days 11-13, despite being seropositive for varicella zoster virus but unvaccinated and on immunosuppression before transplantation. Especially in solid organ transplantation, only six cases of severe acute liver failure that included hepatic encephalopathy and/or impaired consciousness and sudden extremely high (> 4000 U/L) serum aspartate aminotransferase levels have been reported in heart, lung, and kidney transplant patients. CONCLUSIONS: Early diagnosis of hyperacute liver failure due to varicella zoster virus is challenging because the disease progresses rapidly and skin lesions are absent.

Awake prone positioning in an infant following living donor liver transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Prone position has been proven to improve ventilation and oxygenation in infants. Currently, there are few reports of early prone position ventilation after pediatric liver transplantation. Here, we present our experience with prone position in an infant following living donor liver transplantation, in an attempt to improve oxygenation. CASE PRESENTATION: An 8-month-old boy, 7.5 kg, experienced two failed extubations that presented with Type II respiratory failure due to dyspnea, potentially caused by consolidation and airway secretions. To prevent the third failure of extubation, prone position ventilation was implemented after the third extubation on the 11th postoperative day. Oxygenation increased after each prone position session with no signs of transplant liver ischemia or other adverse outcomes. Following two days of continuous prone position, airway secretions decreased, and the infant was discharged from the ICU. The third extubation procedure was successful. CONCLUSIONS: Prone position ventilation may be effective in this infant without adverse events, indicating that early prone position is not absolutely contraindicated after pediatric liver transplantation. Therefore, more reasonable prone position strategies should be sought in infants undergoing liver transplantation.

Correlation between CT volumetry and actual graft weight in living donor liver transplants in South Africa.

Background: Liver transplantation is the definitive management for patients with end-stage liver disease. Preoperative computed tomography (CT) is used in living donor liver transplant (LDLT) for donor and graft selection as well as predicting graft weight. Objectives: The aim of this study is to establish the relationship between estimated graft volume (EGV) and actual graft weight (AGW) and ascertain a correlation coefficient that will improve the accuracy of EGV in a South African population. Method: The study included 117 LDLT between March 2013 and August 2022. Of these, 86 were left lateral (LL), 15 right lobe (R), 10 left lobe with caudate (LC), five left lobe (L) and one segment two (monosegment) grafts. Estimated graft volume and actual graft weight were compared using the Pearson coefficient and the relationship was illustrated with scatter plots. Results: Estimated graft volume and AGW had a strong positive correlation with a Pearson correlation (R) of 0.95 (p < 0.001). The relationship was significantly linear with a correlation coefficient of 0.71. The mean EGV was significantly higher than that of AGW (388 mL ± 249 mL vs. 353 g ± 184 g) with overestimation in 61% of cases. Left lateral and R grafts were the most prevalent LDLT graft type, both having a strong linear correlation between EGV and AGW. Conclusion: Applying a correlation coefficient of 0.71 will improve the accuracy of CT volumetry graft weight predictions. Contribution: A unique correlation coefficient will improve EGV accuracy, aiding in preoperative planning and mitigating post-operative complications in both donors and recipients.

Unique multidisciplinary approach in living donor liver transplantation to achieve total physiological revascularization in a patient with complete occlusion of portal vein system with combined chronic and subacute thrombosis.

Patients receiving liver transplantation in a setting of complete portal vein (PV) and superior mesenteric vein (SMV) thrombosis (Yerdel grade 4) experience lower outcomes after surgery; prognosis is independently influenced by the portal flow reconstruction technique, showing better outcomes in physiological surgical strategies. We describe a case of living donor liver transplantation in which the patient could not receive common physiological reconstructions preoperatively due to multiple small collaterals and extensive thrombosis down to first branches of SMV. We performed thromboendovenectomy of the PV and SMV first, but acute thrombosis developed recurrently even with interposition venous homograft between pericholedochal collateral vein and proximal recipient PV. Immediate after surgery, an intervention radiologist performed stent insertion into 3 stenotic points. Through multidisciplinary approach, complete physiological recanalization was obtained with normal liver function.

Factors Affecting Intraoperative Blood Transfusion Requirements during Living Donor Liver Transplantation.

Background: Intraoperative blood transfusion (IOBT) during liver transplantation (LT) has negative outcomes, and it has been shown that an increasing number of these procedures may no longer require IOBT. Regarding living donor liver transplantation (LDLT), the literature on the pre-transplant predictors of IOBT is quite heterogeneous and deficient. In this study, we reviewed our experience of IOBT among a homogenous cohort of adult right-lobe LDLTs. Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data on adult LDLT recipients between January 2018 and October 2023. Two groups were constructed (No-IOBT vs. IOBT) for the exploration of pre- and intraoperative predictors of IOBT using univariate and multivariate analyses. An ROC curve analysis was applied to identify possible cut-offs. The one-year post-LDLT overall survival was compared using the Kaplan-Meier method. A p-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: A total of 219 adult LDLT recipients were enrolled. The No-IOBT (n = 56) patients were mostly males (p = 0.016), with higher preoperative levels of HGB (p < 0.001), fibrinogen (p = 0.005), and albumin (p = 0.007) and a lower incidence of pre-transplant upper abdominal surgery (p = 0.017), portal vein thrombosis (p = 0.04), hepatorenal syndrome (p = 0.015), and ascites (p = 0.02) than the IOBT group (n = 163). The No-IOBT group had a shorter anhepatic phase (p = 0.002) and received fewer intravenous crystalloids (p = 0.001). In the multivariate analysis, the pre-transplant HGB (p < 0.001), fibrinogen (p < 0.001), and albumin (p = 0.04) levels were independent predictors of IOBT, showing the following cut-offs in the ROC curve analysis: HGB ≤ 11.5 (AUC: 0.800, p < 0.001), fibrinogen ≤ 125 (AUC: 0.638, p = 0.0024), and albumin ≤ 3.6 (AUC: 0.663, p = 0.0002). These were significantly associated with the No-IOBT group. The one-year overall survival of the No-IOBT and IOBT groups was 100% and 83%, respectively (p = 0.007). Conclusions: IOBT during LDLT is associated with inferior outcomes. The increased need of IOBT during LT can be predicted by evaluating serum levels of hemoglobin, albumin and fibrinogen before liver transplantation.

Engagement With Sports After Solid Organ Transplant.

Introduction Transplant Games lend a unique opportunity not only by providing a platform for donors and recipients to engage in sports but also to counter the negativity surrounding organ donation and showcase to the world that transplant recipients can lead active lives. When the Transplant Games were held in Kochi, Kerala, India, for the first time, it provided a venue to engage with transplant recipients, donors, and the families of deceased donors. We aimed to understand the impact that engagement in sports brings on the lives of donors and recipients. Methods After obtaining permission from the organizers, we explained the objectives of the survey to the participants and encouraged them to participate. A survey, covering basic demographic information, transplantation details, and questions related to sports engagement was formulated. Participants could complete the survey electronically via a quick response code or in hard copy. They were fully informed about the objectives of the survey and had the right to withdraw at any stage without consequences. The survey was available for five hours during the games. The study received institutional ethics committee approval (ECASM-AIMS-2024-059). Results Among the approximate 150 participants, we received 78 respondents (52%). After the nine who withdrew consent were removed, we had a full response from 69 participants. Of these, 59 were males (85.5%), and 10 (14.5%) were females. The average age of the participants was 45 ± 13 years. Self-motivation was the most common factor in taking up sports for 30.4% of the responders, followed by family and friends in 23.2% and transplant doctors in 5.8%. Liver Foundation of Kerala (LIFOK), a self-help group of transplant recipients, played a major role in 4.3% of the responders. Bowling was the most popular sport with 23 mentions, followed by carroms and badminton with 27 and 20 mentions, respectively. Donors started to take an active role in sports earlier than recipients, 3.1 ± 1.89 vs. 5.7 ± 5.5 months. The most common reason cited for taking up sports was to become part of the transplant community, followed by a desire to embrace a healthier lifestyle and improve fitness levels. Although none had a personalized coach, most intensified their training and improved nutrition as part of their preparation for the games. Conclusion Our survey is limited by its small and self-selected sample size. Our study highlights the significant role of self-motivation, family support, and self-help groups in encouraging solid organ transplant recipients and donors to engage in sports after surgery. It also highlights the need for more proactive encouragement from doctors and better availability of sports facilities and support staff to help transplant recipients and donors engage in physical activities, which are crucial for their physical and emotional well-being.

Gastric Injury in Percutaneous Transhepatic Liver Biopsy After Living Donor Liver Transplantation: A Report of Two Cases.

Percutaneous transhepatic liver biopsy (PTLB) is essential for assessing liver function but carries risks such as bleeding, cholangitis, bowel injuries, and rare fatal complications. Gastric injury following PTLB is rare and not widely reported. This report describes two cases of gastric injury during ultrasound (US)-guided PTLB in patients following living donor liver transplantation. Gastric injury is uncommon, particularly when sampling from the left lobe due to its proximity to the stomach. Ensuring a clear field of vision, meticulous equipment preparation, and skilled technique are crucial for safe PTLB. When there is a risk of gastric injury, using smaller and shorter needles or alternative methods to US-guided PTLB is essential. Gastric injury should be promptly considered and treated if multiple punctures are required and if abdominal symptoms or gastrointestinal bleeding occur after PTLB.

Differences in chronic lung allograft dysfunction between deceased-donor lung transplantation and living-donor lobar lung transplantation.

OBJECTIVE: This study explored the characteristics and prognostic impact of chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD) after deceased-donor lung transplantation and living-donor lobar lung transplantation, wherein the lower lobes from two donors are usually transplanted into one recipient. METHODS: The clinical data of 123 deceased-donor and 67 living-donor lung transplantations performed in adult patients at our institution between June 2008 and September 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. The cumulative incidence of CLAD was evaluated on a per-recipient and per-donor graft basis using the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: The smaller number of human leukocyte antigen mismatches, shorter ischemic time, and lower incidence of grade 3 primary graft dysfunction were observed in living-donor transplantation than in deceased-donor transplantation (p<0.001). Restrictive allograft syndrome (RAS)-type CLAD occurred in 9 (20.9%) of 43 CLAD patients after deceased-donor transplantation and 9 (45.0%) of 20 CLAD patients after living-donor transplantation. CLAD occurred unilaterally in 15 patients (75.0%) after bilateral living-donor transplantation. Despite the higher incidence of RAS-type CLAD after living-donor transplantation, the overall survival rates after the transplantation and survival rates after the onset of CLAD were comparable between the deceased-donor transplant and living-donor transplant patients. The cumulative incidence of CLAD per recipient was similar between the deceased-donor and the living-donor transplant recipients (p=0.32). In the per-donor graft analysis, the cumulative incidence of CLAD was significantly lower in the living-donor grafts than in the deceased-donor grafts (p=0.003). CONCLUSIONS: The manifestation of CLAD after living-donor lobar lung transplantation is unique and differs from that after deceased-donor lung transplantation.

Role of sonography in detection and evaluation of post liver transplant complications.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the role of sonography in revealing and characterizing liver transplant complications based on gray scale and color Doppler, describe the normal Doppler findings, and discuss the significance of distinguishing normal transient changes in the spectral waveform from findings that may suggests ominous complications. METHODS: We carried out a retrospective cross-sectional study at Prince Sultan Military Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. The medical records and imaging studies of a total of 122 candidates who underwent transplantation between January 2016 to February 2022 were reviewed. RESULTS: Our results showed that most patients were males with the most frequent age group being those between 54-71 years. Hepatitis B virus and hepatic cellular carcinoma were the most common indications for transplants. A total of 95 patients received a graft from a living related donor. Regarding complications, biliary issues (including leaks and ducts dilation) were the second most frequent complication after collections. Vascular complications represented 7.4% of all complications and was the leading cause of death in 4.8% of cases. Among all vascular issues encountered during liver transplant, portal vein thrombosis was the most predominant. In respect to Doppler findings, portal vein velocities and resistive index of hepatic artery had re-averaged within 7-10 post-operative days in most patients. CONCLUSION: Ultrasound plays crucial role in the post-operative management of compilations, facilitating early detection, which is substantial for the graft survival.

Comparison of Biliary Complications Between Living and Deceased Donor Liver Transplantations: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

To understand if the risk of biliary complications is higher with living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) compared to deceased donor liver transplantation (DDLT), the present meta-analysis was conducted to analyze the differences between these two types of liver transplantations. Three databases were searched from inception to September 2023 for comparative studies reporting biliary complications with LDLT and DDLT. Odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals were calculated for all the dichotomous outcomes. Twenty-eight studies were included in the final analysis. LDLT was associated with a significantly higher incidence of biliary complications than DDLT (OR 1.96, 95% CI: 1.56-2.47). However, on subgroup analysis, only studies published in or before 2014 reported a higher incidence of biliary complications with LDLT, but not with studies published after 2014. An analysis of individual adverse events showed that LDLT was associated with a higher incidence of both bile leak (OR 3.38, 95% CI: 2.52-4.53) and biliary stricture (OR 1.75, 95% CI: 1.20-2.55). LDLT was associated with a higher incidence of overall biliary complications, including bile leak and biliary stricture. With advances in surgical techniques, there has been a reduction in the risk of biliary complications.

Comparison of micro-flow imaging and contrast-enhanced ultrasonography in assessing segmental congestion after right living donor liver transplantation.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to determine whether micro-flow imaging (MFI) offers diagnostic performance comparable to that of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (CEUS) in detecting segmental congestion among patients undergoing living donor liver transplantation (LDLT). METHODS: Data from 63 patients who underwent LDLT between May and December 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. MFI and CEUS data collected on the first postoperative day were quantified. Segmental congestion was assessed based on imaging findings and laboratory data, including liver enzymes and total bilirubin levels. The reference standard was a postoperative contrast-enhanced computed tomography scan performed within 2 weeks of surgery. Additionally, a subgroup analysis examined patients who underwent reconstruction of the middle hepatic vein territory. RESULTS: The sensitivity and specificity of MFI were 73.9% and 67.5%, respectively. In comparison, CEUS demonstrated a sensitivity of 78.3% and a specificity of 75.0%. These findings suggest comparable diagnostic performance, with no significant differences in sensitivity (P=0.655) or specificity (P=0.257) between the two modalities. Additionally, early postoperative laboratory values did not show significant differences between patients with and without congestion. The subgroup analysis also indicated similar diagnostic performance between MFI and CEUS. CONCLUSION: MFI without contrast enhancement yielded results comparable to those of CEUS in detecting segmental congestion after LDLT. Therefore, MFI may be considered a viable alternative to CEUS.

Living donor liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma using expanded criteria and alpha-fetoprotein threshold of 1000 ng/mL.

BACKGROUND: New guidelines propose a minimum 5-year survival of 60% for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with living donor liver transplantation (LDLT). This study aimed to evaluate the 5- and 10-year survival rates after transplantation for the expanded criteria for HCC. METHODS: This single-center retrospective cohort study included 208 patients who underwent LDLT for the expanded criteria (the largest tumor diameter of ≤10 cm, any tumor number, and alpha-fetoprotein [AFP] level of <1000 ng/mL) and analyzed 5- and 10-year overall survival (OS) and recurrence risk (RR) rates. RESULTS: With a median follow-up of 65.1 months (IQR, 19.1-80.2), the 5- and 10-year OS and RR rates were 67.0% and 61.0% and 20.5% and 22.5%, respectively. The largest tumor diameter of >6 cm (hazard ratio [HR], 3.7; 95% CI, 1.7-8.2; P = .001) and AFP level of >400 ng/mL (HR, 4.0; 95% CI, 1.8-9.0; P = .001) were predictors of recurrence. Patients outside the Milan criteria (MC) were grouped into low- and high-risk HCC based on tumor size and AFP level. For low-risk HCC (tumor size of <6 cm, any tumor number, and AFP level of <400 ng/mL), the 5-year RR was comparable to the MC and increased the transplant pool by 35.7% (P > .5). The median number of tumors and the rate of microvascular invasion in the high-risk group, low-risk group, and MC were 2.0 (1.0-3.2), 4.0 (2.0-5.0), and 1.0 (1.0-2.0) (P < .001) and 72.2% (13/18), 44.0% (22/50), and 22.8% (32/140) (P < .001), respectively. CONCLUSION: The expanded criteria met the benchmark for 5-year survival. LDLT for the low-risk HCC in the expanded criteria was associated with an acceptable RR.

Failure to Rescue Pediatric Recipients of Living Donor Liver Transplantation: A Single-Center Study of Technical Complications in 500 Primary Grafts.

BACKGROUND: The concept of failure to rescue (FTR) has been used to evaluate the quality of care in several surgical specialties but has not been well-studied after living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) in children. METHODS: This study retrospectively reviewed 500 pediatric LDLT performed at a single center between 1993 and 2022. The recipient outcomes were assessed by means of patient and graft survival rates, retransplantation rates, and arterial/portal/biliary complication rates. Graft and patient losses secondary to these complications were calculated regarding FTR for patients (FTRp) and grafts (FTRg). RESULTS: Overall 1- and 5-year patient survival rates were 94.5% and 92.1%, respectively, the corresponding figures for graft survival being 92.7% and 89.8%. One-year hepatic artery complication rate was 3.6% (n = 18 cases), the respective rates for portal vein complications and biliary complications being 5.7% (n = 57) and 15.6% (n = 101). One-year FTRp rates for hepatic artery thrombosis, portal vein thrombosis, anastomotic biliary stricture, and intrahepatic biliary stricture were 28.6%, 9.4%, 3.6%, and 0%, respectively. The corresponding FTRg rates being 21.4%, 6.3%, 0%, and 36.4%. CONCLUSION: Such novel analytical method may offer valuable insights for optimizing quality of care in pediatric LDLT.

Arterial anastomosis in LDLT: techniques and risks.

Reconstructing the hepatic artery in adult living donor liver transplantation is technically challenging, with complications leading to significant morbidity and mortality. Early arterial thrombosis can result in a mortality rate up to 50%, often necessitating re-transplantation. The most common techniques for arterial anastomosis include end-to-end reconstruction with interrupted or continuous sutures, either using magnifying loupes or a microscope. Although microscopes provide enhanced precision, they do not significantly reduce early thrombosis rates compared to loupes but increase surgical time. Overall, surgeons can achieve early thrombosis rates below 1% with experience and evolving techniques.

Comparison of modified extended right lobe graft versus modified right lobe graft in adult living donor liver transplantation: Experience from Pakistan.

Objectives: To compare the outcomes of modified extended right lobe graft (MERLG) and modified right lobe graft (MRLG) in living-donor liver transplantation (LDLT). Methods: This retrospective study was performed at the Liver transplant department of the Pir Abdul Qadir Shah Jeelani Institute of Medical Sciences Hospital, Gambat, Pakistan, from March 2019 to September 2020. The outcomes of 20 MERLG donors and recipients were compared to those of 74 MRLG donors and recipients. Demographics, operative parameters, complications, hospital stay, and one-year survival were compared between the two groups. Results: The mean graft volume of the MERLG group was more (637.10 ± 71.35 g) than in the MRLG group (562.27 ± 57.77 g), (p= 0.001). Donor blood loss was higher in the MERLG group (680.10±170.60 ml) compared to the MRLG group (650.23±190.65 ml), p=0.527. In addition, the operative time was longer in the MERLG group (345.80±76.90 min) than in the MRLG group (318.12±100.80 min) (p= 0.257). The MERLG recipients were sicker (mean MELD score of 22.54±3.67) than the MRLG (18.86±4.37) (p=0.001). The drain output was higher in the MRLG group (1340 ± 470.32 ml) than in the MERLG group (1110 ± 450.60 ml) (P =0.045). No significant difference was found when comparing postoperative laboratory results and complications between the donor and recipient groups (p >0.05). Kaplan-Meier analysis showed a 95% one-year survival in MERLG group compared to 90.7% in the MRLG group (p=0.549). Conclusion: With appropriate technical expertise, MERLGs are technically safe and feasible in LDLT donors without any added risks. MERLGs also yielded better outcomes in sick recipients.

Outcomes of liver transplantation for hepatocelluler carcinoma from living donor versus deceased donor within University of Southern California San Francisco criteria: a report from Turkey.

Background: Hepatocellular cancer (HCC) is the most common primary liver cancer with increasing incidence. Liver transplantation (LT) has been accepted as main curative liver cancer treatment. The effectiveness of LDLT as opposed to Deceased Donor Liver Transplant (DDLT) for patients with HCC is still controversial. There is limited data comparing the long-term outcomes of patients undergoing LDLT or DDLT for HCCs that do not meet the Milan criteria. Methods: We aimed to compare the perioperative and survival outcomes of LDLT with DDLT in HCC patients.Patients underwent LT between January 2012 and December 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. There were 137 patients who met the UCSF criteria. Of these, 75 patients received LDLT and 62 patients DDLT.The primary end points in the present study were oncologic outcomes such as the recurrence rate, disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) of LDLT and DDLT in patients with HCC. Results: PET-CT SUVmax value, the amount of erythrocyte solution (ES) as blood transfusion of red cells given and the tumor recurrence rate were significantly higher among the deceased patients recurrence, ES, PET-CT SUVmax value and tumor differentiation had significant effects on survival. In the multivariate reduced model, cox regression analysis showed significant effects of recurrence, ES, locoregional treatment response and PET-CT on survival.Albeit not significant, the one-year recurrence rate in the LDLT was similar to that in the DDLT, three- and five-year recurrence rates were higher in DDLT compared to LDLT. Conclusion: There is less chance of cold ischemia time and better-quality grafts with minimal fatty changes, lower recurrence rates and similar survival rates can be achieved in LDLT compared to DDLT.

Clinical significance and outcomes of adult living donor liver transplantation for acute liver failure: a retrospective cohort study based on 15-year single-center experience.

Purpose: This study aimed to describe adult living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) for acute liver failure and evaluate its clinical significance by comparing its surgical and survival outcomes with those of deceased donor liver transplantation (DDLT). Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 267 consecutive patients (161 LDLT recipients and 106 DDLT recipients) aged 18 years or older who underwent liver transplantation between January 2006 and December 2020. Results: The mean periods from hepatic encephalopathy to liver transplantation were 5.85 days and 8.35 days for LDLT and DDLT, respectively (P = 0.091). Among these patients, 121 (45.3%) had grade III or IV hepatic encephalopathy (living, 34.8% vs. deceased, 61.3%; P < 0.001), and 38 (14.2%) had brain edema (living, 16.1% vs. deceased, 11.3%; P = 0.269) before liver transplantation. There were no significant differences in in-hospital mortality (living, 11.8% vs. deceased, 15.1%; P = 0.435), 10-year overall survival (living, 90.8% vs. deceased, 84.0%; P = 0.096), and graft survival (living, 83.5% vs. deceased, 71.3%; P = 0.051). However, postoperatively, the mean intensive care unit stay was shorter in the LDLT group (5.0 days vs. 9.5 days, P < 0.001). In-hospital mortality was associated with vasopressor use (odds ratio [OR], 3.40; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.45-7.96; P = 0.005) and brain edema (OR, 2.75; 95% CI, 1.16-6.52; P = 0.022) of recipient at the time of transplantation. However, LDLT (OR, 1.26; 95% CI, 0.59-2.66; P = 0.553) was not independently associated with in-hospital mortality. Conclusion: LDLT is feasible for acute liver failure when organs from deceased donors are not available.

The Rochester Protocol for Living Donor Liver Transplantation of Unresectable Colorectal Liver Metastasis: A 5-Year Report on Selection, Approval, and Outcomes.

Living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) is a treatment option for select patients with unresectable colorectal liver metastasis (uCRLM). We describe our center's experience of patient selection, insurance approval, and outcomes after LDLT after first referral in March 2019. Of the 206 evaluated patients, twenty-three underwent LDLT. We found that patients who were referred earlier in their oncologic course were more likely to be eligible for transplantation. After completion of the Rochester Protocol for LDLT eligibility, recipients had a median delay of care of 10 days (IQR 0-36) related to insurance appeal, with six patients (30%) having a delay longer than 30 days. LDLT recipients had an overall survival proportion of 100% and 91% at 1, and 3 years; and a recurrence-free survival proportion of 100% and 40%, at 1 and 3 years, respectively. All donors underwent right hepatectomy, of which only one donor had a Clavien-Dindo IIIa complication and readmission. There was no donor mortality. We assert that multidisciplinary care and strict patient selection through the Rochester Protocol were paramount to our center's success. In the appropriately selected patient, LDLT for uCRLM may be justified, and patients should be referred to transplant oncology centers for evaluation.

Right and left living donor nephrectomy and operative approach: A systematic review and meta-analysis of donor and recipient outcomes.

INTRODUCTION: The left kidney is preferable in living donor nephrectomy (LDN). We aimed to investigate the safety and efficacy of right versus left LDN in both donor and recipients. A subgroup analysis of outcomes based on operative approach was also performed. METHODS: A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed as per PRISMA guidelines. Outcomes of interest were extracted from included studies and analysed. RESULTS: There were 31 studies included with 79,912 transplants. Left LDN was performed in 84.1 % of cases and right LDN in 15.9 %. Right LDN was associated with reduced EBL (P = 0.010), intra-operative complications (P = 0.030) and operative time (P = 0.006), but higher rates of conversion to open surgery (1.4 % vs 0.9 %). However, right living donor renal transplantation (LDRT) had higher rates of delayed graft function (5.4 % vs 4.2 %, P < 0.0001) and graft loss (2.6 % vs 1.1 %, P < 0.0001). Graft survival was reduced in right LDRT at 3 years (92.0 % vs 94.2 %, P = 0.001) but comparable to left LDRT at 1- and 5-years. Otherwise, donor and recipient peri-operative outcomes and serum creatinine levels were comparable in both groups. Hand-assisted LDN was associated with shorter warm ischaemia time (P < 0.0001) but longer length of stay (LOS) than laparoscopic LDN and robotic-assisted LDN (P < 0.0001). RA-LDN was associated with less EBL and shorter LOS (both P < 0.0001) while patients who underwent L-LDN had a lower mean serum creatinine (SCr) level on discharge (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: Right LDRT has higher rates of delayed graft function and graft loss compared to left LDRT. Minimally-invasive surgical approaches potentially offer improved outcomes but further large-scale randomised controlled trials studies are required to confirm this finding.