Exceptional sustained long-term complete response to Tepotinib in a MET-amplified advanced intrahepatic biliary tract cancer failing Durvalumab plus Cisplatin and Gemcitabine.

BACKGROUND: Biliary tract cancers (BTCs) are a diverse group of malignancies with varied genetic backgrounds. The prevalence of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCC) is increasing, particularly in Western countries. Despite advancements in treatments, the prognosis for BTC remains poor. Recent molecular profiling has revealed that up to 40% of iCC cases have targetable genetic alterations. MET amplification, although rare, presents a significant target for therapy. CASE PRESENTATION: A 25-year-old female with a history of ulcerative colitis presented with shoulder pain and a positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT) scan revealed an enlarged liver and multiple metastases. Histopathological analysis diagnosed poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma. First-line therapy with Cisplatin, Gemcitabine, and Durvalumab resulted in disease progression. Molecular profiling identified a TP53 mutation and MET amplification. Based on these findings, Tepotinib was initiated. Tepotinib treatment led to a significant reduction in tumor size and normalization of CA 19-9 levels within 2 months, achieving a complete metabolic remission lasting up to 17 months. The treatment was well tolerated with minimal side effects. DISCUSSION: MET-amplified BTCs are exceedingly rare, and evidence for targeted treatment is limited. This case demonstrates the efficacy of Tepotinib in a young patient with MET-amplified iCC, showing a long-term response and suggesting a potential new standard treatment option for this molecularly defined entity. This case also highlights the aggressive nature of MET-amplified tumors and the need for targeted second-line therapies. CONCLUSION: Tepotinib showed remarkable efficacy in treating MET-amplified intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, underscoring the importance of molecular profiling in BTCs and suggesting a potential new therapeutic approach for this rare cancer subtype.

Multicenter Real-World Analysis of Combined MET and EGFR Inhibition in Patients With Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer and Acquired MET Amplification or Polysomy After EGFR Inhibition.

PURPOSE: MET amplification is a common resistance mechanism to EGFR inhibition in EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Several trials showed encouraging results with combined EGFR and MET inhibition (EGFRi/METi). However, MET amplification has been inconsistently defined and frequently included both polysomy and true amplification. METHODS: This is a multicenter, real-world analysis in patients with disease progression on EGFR inhibition and MET copy number gain (CNG), defined as either true amplification (MET to centromere of chromosome 7 ratio [MET-CEP7] ≥ 2) or polysomy (gene copy number ≥ 5, MET-CEP7 < 2). RESULTS: A total of 43 patients with MET CNG were included, 42 of whom were detected by FISH. Twenty-three, 7, and 14 received EGFRi/METi, METi, and SoC, respectively. Patients in the EGFRi/METi cohort exhibited a superior real-world clinical benefit rate, defined as stable disease or better, of 82% (95% confidence interval [CI], 60-95) compared to METi (29%, 4-71) and SoC (50%, 23-77). Median real-world progression-free survival was longer with EGFRi/METi with 9.8 vs. 4.3 months with METi (hazard ratio [HR], 0.19, 95% CI, 0.06-0.57) and 3.7 months with SoC (0.41, 0.18-0.91), respectively. Overall survival was numerically improved. Interaction analysis with treatment and type of CNG (amplification vs. polysomy) suggests that differences were exclusively driven by MET-amplified patients receiving EGFRi/METi (HR for OS, 0.09, 0.01-0.54). CONCLUSION: In this real-world study, EGFRi/METi showed clinical benefit over METi and SoC. Future studies should focus on the differential impact of the type of MET CNG with a focus on true MET amplification as predictor of response.

A phase II study of tepotinib in patients with advanced solid cancers harboring MET exon 14 skipping mutations or amplification (KCSG AL19-17).

BACKGROUND: We evaluated the efficacy and safety of tepotinib in patients with various solid cancers harboring MET exon 14 skipping mutation (METex14) or MET gene amplification. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A phase II, multicenter study was conducted in patients with advanced or metastatic solid cancers who progressed after standard treatment, harboring either METex14 or MET amplification detected in tissue-based next-generation sequencing (NGS). The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR). For exploratory analyses, we analyzed the gene profiles using plasma NGS test. RESULTS: Thirty-five patients were enrolled. The ORR was 57.6% for all patients, 52.2% for those with METex14, and 70% for those with MET amplification. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 8 months [95% confidence interval (CI) 4.5-11.5 months] and median overall survival (OS) was 14 months (95% CI 7.8-20.2 months) in all patients. For patients with non-small-cell lung cancer with METex14, the median PFS was 9 months (95% CI 4.7-13.4 months) and the median OS was 17 months [95% CI not applicable (NA)-NA]. For patients with MET amplification, the median PFS was 7 months (95% CI 1.5-12.5 months) and the median OS was 10 months (95% CI 5.8-14.2 months). The ORR of patients with MET dysregulation detected by plasma NGS was 72.2%, whereas the ORR was 30% in those without detection. The most common adverse events were peripheral edema, asthenia, transaminase elevation, and anorexia, mostly grade 1 or 2. CONCLUSIONS: Tepotinib demonstrated consistent antitumor activity in patients with METex14, and promising antitumor activity in various cancers with MET amplification. Detection of MET dysregulation by plasma NGS may predict the response to tepotinib.

Genomic and Immune Landscape Comparison of MET Exon 14 Skipping and MET-Amplified Non-small Cell Lung Cancer.

BACKGROUND: Mutation or amplification of the mesenchymal-epithelial transition (MET) tyrosine kinase receptor causes dysregulation of receptor function and stimulates tumor growth in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with the most common mutation being MET exon 14 (METex14). We sought to compare the genomic and immune landscape of MET-altered NSCLC with MET wild-type NSCLC. METHODS: 18,047 NSCLC tumors were sequenced with Tempus xT assay. Tumors were categorized based on MET exon 14 (METex14) mutations; low MET amplification defined as a copy number gain (CNG) 6-9, high MET amplification defined as CNG ≥ 10, and MET other type mutations. Immuno-oncology (IO) biomarkers and the frequency of other somatic gene alterations were compared across MET-altered and MET wild-type groups. RESULTS: 276 (1.53%) METex14, 138 (0.76%) high METamp, 63 (0.35%) low METamp, 27 (0.15%) MET other, and 17,543 (97%) MET wild-type were identified. Patients with any MET mutation including METex14 were older, while patients with METex14 were more frequently female and nonsmokers. MET gene expression was highest in METamp tumors. PD-L1 positivity rates were higher in MET-altered groups than MET wild-type. METex14 exhibited the lowest tumor mutational burden (TMB) and lowest neoantigen tumor burden (NTB). METamp exhibited the lowest proportion of CD4 T cells and the highest proportion of NK cells. There were significant differences in co-alterations between METamp and METex14. CONCLUSIONS: METex14 tumors exhibited differences in IO biomarkers and the somatic landscape compared to non-METex14 NSCLC tumors. Variations in immune profiles can affect immunotherapy selection in MET-altered NSCLC and require further exploration.

Reversing MET-Mediated Resistance in Oncogene-Driven NSCLC by MET-Activated Wnt Condensative Prodrug.

The amplification of MET is a major cause of acquired resistance to targeted therapy in EGFR-mutant non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), only to be temporarily restrained by the partial efficacy of MET inhibitors. This study reveals that the MET inhibitor has unexpectedly limited efficacy due to amplified MET triggering a strong positive feedback loop in the Wnt/ß-catenin signaling pathway, allowing optimal functionality even when the MET pathway is suppressed again. To test this conjecture and specifically target the Wnt/ß-catenin pathway, a cleverly designed Wnt condensative pro drug called WntSI is developed using reversible supramolecular self-assembly driven by liquidliquid phase separation (LLPS). This process involves a MET/pH-responsive peptide (Tyr-Pep) and a potent Wnt inhibitor known as CA. Upon recognition and phosphorylation of Tyr-Pep by over expressed MET in cells, it disrupts LLPS propensity and facilitates the disintegration of WntSI. Consequently,this enables it to suppress the carcinogenic effect mediated by ß-catenin,effectively overcoming acquired resistance to EGFR-TKIs caused by MET amplification in both cell line-derived and patient-derived tumor xenograft (PDX) mouse models while maintaining exceptional biosecurity. This effective strategy not only suppresses the Wnt/ß-catenin signaling pathway selectively, but also serves as an innovative example for pro-drug development through biologically responsive LLPS.

Evaluation of molecular residual disease in operable non-small cell lung cancer with gene fusions, MET exon skipping or de novo MET amplification.

Gene fusions and MET alterations are rare and difficult to detect in plasma samples. The clinical detection efficacy of molecular residual disease (MRD) based on circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with these mutations remains unknown. This prospective, non-intervention study recruited 49 patients with operable NSCLC with actionable gene fusions (ALK, ROS1, RET, and FGFR1), MET exon 14 skipping or de novo MET amplification. We analyzed 43 tumor tissues and 111 serial perioperative plasma samples using 1021- and 338-gene panels, respectively. Detectable MRD correlated with a significantly higher recurrence rate (P < 0.001), yielding positive predictive values of 100% and 90.9%, and negative predictive values of 82.4% and 86.4% at landmark and longitudinal time points, respectively. Patients with detectable MRD showed reduced disease-free survival (DFS) compared to those with undetectable MRD (P < 0.001). Patients who harbored tissue-derived fusion/MET alterations in their MRD had reduced DFS compared to those who did not (P = 0.05). To our knowledge, this is the first comprehensive study on ctDNA-MRD clinical detection efficacy in operable NSCLC patients with gene fusions and MET alterations. Patients with detectable tissue-derived fusion/MET alterations in postoperative MRD had worse clinical outcomes.

Phase 2 trial of crizotinib in Japanese patients with advanced NSCLC harboring a MET gene alteration: a Co-MET study.

BACKGROUND: MET exon 14 skipping mutations occur in 3-4% and MET high amplifications occur in < 1% of patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Crizotinib, a selective ATP-competitive small-molecule inhibitor of c-Met, ALK, and ROS1 tyrosine kinases, has shown activity in cancer models with various types of MET activation. METHODS: The Co-MET study is a single-arm phase 2 trial to assess the safety and efficacy of crizotinib in MET inhibitor-naïve patients with advanced NSCLC harboring MET exon 14 skipping mutation (cohort 1) or high MET gene copy number of ≥ 7 (cohort 2). The primary endpoint was the objective response rate (ORR) per RECIST v1.1 by independent radiology review in cohort 1. The key secondary endpoints were the duration of response (DoR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety. RESULTS: A total of 28 patients (23 in cohort 1 and 5 in cohort 2) were enrolled between March 2018 and February 2020. The primary endpoint was met as the ORR (90% confidence interval: CI) in cohort 1 was 38.1% (20.6-58.3). Median DoR, PFS, and OS (95% CI) were 7.6 (1.9-NE), 5.7 (2.1-11.3), 9.1 (4.0-19.9) months, respectively, in cohort 1. ORR in cohort 2 was 40.0% (18.9-92.4). The safety signals were generally consistent with the known safety profile of crizotinib. CONCLUSIONS: Crizotinib showed a clinical activity similar to that of tepotinib and capmatinib in patients with NSCLC harboring MET exon 14 skipping mutations. CLINICAL TRIAL INFORMATION: UMIN000031623.

Efficacy and safety analysis of immunotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer patients with MET alterations.

BACKGROUND: Mesenchymal epithelial transition factor (MET) is a rare oncologic driver gene, and information on immunotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with this driver gene is limited. Here we evaluate the efficacy and safety of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) under different therapeutic regimen for NSCLC patients with MET alterations. METHODS: From June 2019 to December 2023, we assessed the efficacy and toxicity of ICIs in 42 NSCLC patients with MET alterations. Survival curves were plotted using the Kaplan-Meier method and the Cox proportional hazards model applied for univariate and multivariate analyses. We assessed the size of target lesion according to RECIST v1.1, and objective response rate (ORR) was defined as the sum of complete response (CR) and partial response (PR), disease control rate (DCR) as the sum of CR, PR, and disease stable. RESULTS: A total of 42 NSCLC patients with MET alterations were included in this retrospective study, 10 was MET 14 skipping mutation and 32 was MET amplification. The ORR for ICI treatment was 30.95% and the DCR was 71.43%. Median progression-free survival (mPFS) and median overall survival (OS) were 4.40 and 13.97 months, respectively. There exists statistical differences between the mPFS of ICI monotherapy and combine ICI therapy (2.8 vs 7.8 months, p = 0.022). The incidence of drug-related adverse reactions was 47.62%, mainly bone marrow suppression (14.28%), immune-related pneumonia (7.14%), and liver function impairment (7.14%), and six patients (14.28%) experiencing grade 3 or above adverse events. CONCLUSION: NSCLC patients with MET alterations can benefit from immunotherapy, especially the patients treated by combined ICI therapy. However, special attention should be paid to the occurrence of grade 3/4 adverse reactions while using the combined ICI therapy.

Molecular features and clinical outcomes of EGFR-mutated, MET-amplified non-small-cell lung cancer after resistance to dual-targeted therapy.

Background: Some studies of dual-targeted therapy (DTT) targeting epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and mesenchymal-epithelial transition (MET) have shown promising efficacy in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Consequently, patient management following DTT resistance has gained significance. However, the underlying resistance mechanisms and clinical outcomes in these patients remain unclear. Objectives: This study aimed to delineate the molecular characteristics and survival outcomes of patients with NSCLC harboring EGFR mutations and acquired MET amplification after developing resistance to DTT. Design: We conducted a retrospective analysis of patients with NSCLC with EGFR mutations and acquired MET amplification who exhibited resistance to EGFR/MET DTT. Methods: Next-generation sequencing (NGS) was performed on patients with available tissue samples before and/or after the development of resistance to DTT. Stratified analyses were carried out based on data sources and subsequent salvage treatments. Univariate/multivariate Cox regression models and survival analyses were employed to explore potential independent prognostic factors. Results: The study included 77 NSCLC patients, with NGS conducted on 19 patients. We observed many resistance mechanisms, including EGFR-dependent pathways (4/19, 21.1%), MET-dependent pathways (2/19, 10.5%), EGFR/MET co-dependent pathways (2/19, 10.5%), and EGFR/MET-independent resistance mechanisms (11/19, 57.9%). Post-progression progression-free survival (pPFS) and post-progression overall survival (pOS) significantly varied among patients who received the best supportive care (BSC), targeted therapy, or chemotherapy (CT), with median pPFS of 1.5, 3.9, and 4.9 months, respectively (p = 0.003). Median pOS were 2.3, 7.7, and 9.2 months, respectively (p < 0.001). The number of treatment lines following DTT resistance and the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status emerged as the independent prognostic factors. Conclusion: This study revealed a heterogeneous landscape of resistance mechanisms to EGFR/MET DTT, with a similar prevalence of on- and off-target mechanisms. Targeted therapy or CT, as compared to BSC, exhibited the potential to improve survival outcomes for patients with advanced NSCLC following resistance to DTT.

Comparison of genomic alterations in Epstein-Barr virus-positive and Epstein-Barr virus-negative diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.

BACKGROUND: Epstein-Barr virus (EBV)-positive diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (EBV-posDLBCL) is an aggressive B-cell lymphoma that often presents similar morphological and immune phenotype features to that of EBV-negative DLBCL (EBV-negDLBCL). AIMS AND METHODS: To better understand their difference in genomic landscape, we performed whole-exome sequencing (WES) of EBV-posDLBCL and EBV-negDLBCL. RESULTS: This analysis revealed a new mutational signature 17 (unknown) and signature 29 (smoking) in EBV-posDLBCL as well as a specific mutational signature 24 (associated with aflatoxin) in EBV-negDLBCL. Compared with EBV-negDLBCL, more somatic copy number alterations (CNAs) and deletions were detected in EBV-posDLBCL (p = 0.01). The most frequent CNAs specifically detected in EBV-posDLBCL were gains at 9p24.1 (PDL1 and JAK2), 8q22.2-q24.23 (DEPTOR and MYC), and 7q31.31-q32.2 (MET), which were validated in additional EBV-posDLBCL cases. Overall, 53.7% (22/41) and 62.9% (22/35) of the cases expressed PD-L1 and c-MET, respectively, in neoplastic cells, whereas only 15.4% (4/26) expressed c-MYC. Neoplastic c-MET expression was positively correlated with PD-L1 (p < 0.001) and MYC expression (p = 0.016). However, EBV-posDLBCL cases did not show any differences in overall survival between PD-L1-, c-MET-, or c-MYC-positive and -negative cases or between age-related groups. Analysis of the association between somatic mutation load and EBV status showed no difference in the distribution of tumor mutant burden between the two lymphomas (p = 0.41). Recurrent mutations in EBV-posDLBCL implicated several genes, including DCAF8L1, KLF2, and NOL9, while in EBV-negDLBCL, ANK2, BPTF, and CNIH3 were more frequently mutated. Additionally, PIM1 is the most altered gene in all the WES-detected cases. CONCLUSIONS: Our results confirm that genomic alteration differs significantly between EBV-posDLBCL and EBV-negDLBCL, and reveal new genetic alterations in EBV-posDLBCL. The positive correlation of c-MET and PD-L1/c-Myc expression may be involved in the pathogenesis of EBV-posDLBCL, which is should be explored prospectively in trials involving MET-directed therapies.

Response to capmatinib in a patient with neuroendocrine carcinoma of the gallbladder origin harboring MET amplification.

Neuroendocrine carcinoma (NEC) of the gallbladder origin is particularly rare, accounting for only 0.38% of primary malignancies of the gallbladder, and standard therapies are limited. The MET gene encodes the tyrosine kinase receptor, c-Met. Pathogenic variants of MET, such as MET exon 14 skipping and MET amplification, result in excessive downstream signaling that promotes tumor progression. A MET inhibitor, capmatinib, blocks signaling of c-Met and has been approved by the Food and Drug Administration for non-small cell lung cancer with MET exon 14 skipping. The effectiveness of capmatinib has been reported in other cancers with MET amplification, but NEC with MET variants has not been reported. Here, we present a case of a 72-year-old woman with NEC of the gallbladder with multiple liver and lymph node metastases, who was resistant to conventional chemotherapy including carboplatin plus etoposide as first-line treatment and irinotecan as second-line treatment, but she responded to capmatinib. After 6 weeks of treatment, CT scan showed a partial response (80% reduction in size), but after 13 weeks, regrowth of liver metastasis was observed. Herein, we report a meaningful efficacy of capmatinib to the patient of NEC of the gallbladder origin with MET amplification.

MET alterations in advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

Precision medicine has helped identify several tumor molecular aberrations to be treated with targeted therapies. These therapies showed substantial improvement in efficacy without excessive toxicity in patients with specific oncogenic drivers with advanced cancers. In metastatic lung cancers, the implementation of broad platforms for molecular tumor sequencing has helped oncology providers identify oncogenic drivers linked with better outcomes when treated upfront with targeted therapies. Mesenchymal-epithelial transition factor (MET) alterations are present in up to 60% of non-small cell lung cancer and are associated with a poor prognosis. Capmatinib and tepotinib are currently the only two approved targeted therapies by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for patients with MET exon 14 skipping mutation. Several agents are being developed to tackle an unmet need in patients with MET alterations. Some of these agents are being used in combination with EGFR targeted therapy to mitigate resistance to EGFR inhibitor. These agents are poised to provide new hope for these patients.

Plasma ddPCR for the detection of MET amplification in advanced NSCLC patients: a comparative real-world study.

Background: Mesenchymal-epithelial transition (MET) amplification is a crucial oncogenic driver and a resistance mechanism to epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) is the gold standard for MET amplification detection. However, it is inapplicable when tissue samples are unavailable. Objective: This study assessed the performance of plasma droplet digital polymerase chain reaction (ddPCR) in MET amplification detection in NSCLC patients. Design and methods: A total of 87 NSCLC patients were enrolled, and 94 paired tissue and plasma samples were analyzed for the concordance between FISH and plasma ddPCR/tissue next-generation sequencing (NGS) in detecting MET amplification. In addition, the efficacy of patients with MET amplification using different detection methods who were treated with MET-TKIs was evaluated. Results: Plasma ddPCR showed substantial concordance with FISH (74.1% sensitivity, 92.5% specificity, and 87.2% accuracy with a kappa value of 0.68) and outperformed tissue NGS (kappa value of 0.64) in MET amplification detection. Combined plasma ddPCR and tissue NGS showed substantial concordance with FISH (92.3% sensitivity, 89.2% specificity, and an accuracy of 90.1% with a kappa value of 0.77). The efficacy is comparable in these NSCLC patients with MET amplification detected by FISH and plasma ddPCR who were treated with MET-TKIs. Conclusion: Plasma ddPCR is a potentially reliable method for detecting MET amplification in advanced NSCLC patients. Combined plasma ddPCR and tissue NGS might be an alternative or complementary method to MET amplification detection.

Unraveling the Significance of MET Focal Amplification in Lung Cancer: Integrative NGS, FISH, and IHC Investigation.

MET amplification (METamp) represents a promising therapeutic target in non-small cell lung cancer, but no consensus has been established to identify METamp-dependent tumors that could potentially benefit from MET inhibitors. In this study, an analysis of MET amplification/overexpression status was performed in a retrospectively recruited cohort comprising 231 patients with non-small cell lung cancer from Shanghai Chest Hospital (SCH cohort) using 3 methods: fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), hybrid capture-based next-generation sequencing, and immunohistochemistry for c-MET and phospho-MET. The SCH cohort included 130 cases known to be METamp positive by FISH and 101 negative controls. The clinical relevance of these approaches in predicting the efficacy of MET inhibitors was evaluated. Additionally, next-generation sequencing data from another 2 cohorts including 22,010 lung cancer cases were utilized to examine the biological characteristics of different METamp subtypes. Of the 231 cases, 145 showed MET amplification/overexpression using at least 1 method, whereas only half of them could be identified by all 3 methods. METamp can occur as focal amplification or polysomy. Our study revealed that the inconsistency between next-generation sequencing and FISH primarily occurred in the polysomy subtype. Further investigations indicated that compared with polysomy, focal amplification correlated with fewer co-occurring driver mutations, higher protein expressions of c-MET and phospho-MET, and higher incidence in acquired resistance than in de novo setting. Moreover, patients with focal amplification presented a more robust response to MET inhibitors compared with those with polysomy. Notably, a strong correlation was observed between focal amplification and programmed cell death ligand-1 expression, indicating potential therapeutic implications with combined MET inhibitor and immunotherapy for patients with both alterations. Our findings provide insights into the molecular complexity and clinical relevance of METamp in lung cancer, highlighting the role of MET focal amplification as an oncogenic driver and its feasibility as a primary biomarker to further investigate the clinical activity of MET inhibitors in future studies.

The Efficacy and Safety of Treating Acquired MET Resistance Through Combinations of Parent and MET Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors in Patients With Metastatic Oncogene-Driven NSCLC.

Introduction: Acquired MET gene amplification, MET exon 14 skip mutations, or MET fusions can emerge as resistance mechanisms to tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in patients with lung cancer. The efficacy and safety of combining MET TKIs (such as crizotinib, capmatinib, or tepotinib) with parent TKIs to target acquired MET resistance are not well characterized. Methods: Multi-institutional retrospective chart review identified 83 patients with metastatic oncogene-driven NSCLC that were separated into the following two pairwise matched cohorts: (1) MET cohort (n = 41)-patients with acquired MET resistance continuing their parent TKI with a MET TKI added or (2) Chemotherapy cohort (n = 42)-patients without any actionable resistance continuing their parent TKI with a platinum-pemetrexed added. Clinicopathologic features, radiographic response (by means of Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1), survival outcomes, adverse events (AEs) (by means of Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 5.0), and genomic data were collected. Survival outcomes were assessed using Kaplan-Meier methods. Multivariate modeling adjusted for lines of therapy, brain metastases, TP53 mutations, and oligometastatic disease. Results: Within the MET cohort, median age was 56 years (range: 36-83 y). Most patients were never smokers (28 of 41, 68.3%). Baseline brain metastases were common (21 of 41, 51%). The most common oncogenes in the MET cohort were EGFR (30 of 41, 73.2%), ALK (seven of 41, 17.1%), and ROS1 (two of 41, 4.9%). Co-occurring TP53 mutations (32 of 41, 78%) were frequent. Acquired MET alterations included MET gene amplification (37 of 41, 90%), MET exon 14 mutations (two of 41, 5%), and MET gene fusions (two of 41, 5%). After multivariate adjustment, the objective response rate (ORR) was higher in the MET cohort versus the chemotherapy cohort (ORR: 69.2% versus 20%, p < 0.001). Within the MET cohort, MET gene copy number (≥10 versus 6-10) did not affect radiographic response (54.5% versus 68.4%, p = 0.698). There was no difference in ORR on the basis of MET TKI used (F [2, 36] = 0.021, p = 0.978). There was no difference in progression-free survival (5 versus 6 mo; hazard ratio = 0.64; 95% confidence interval: 0.34-1.23, p = 0.18) or overall survival (13 versus 11 mo; hazard ratio = 0.75; 95% confidence interval: 0.42-1.35, p = 0.34) between the MET and chemotherapy cohorts. In the MET cohort, dose reductions for MET TKI-related toxicities were common (17 of 41, 41.4%) but less frequent for parent TKIs (two of 41, 5%). Grade 3 AEs were not significant between crizotinib, capmatinib, and tepotinib (p = 0.3). The discontinuation rate of MET TKIs was 17% with no significant differences between MET TKIs (p = 0.315). Among pre- and post-treatment biopsies (n = 17) in the MET cohort, the most common next-generation sequencing findings were loss of MET gene amplification (15 of 17, 88.2%), MET on-target mutations (seven of 17, 41.2%), new Ras-Raf-MAPK alterations (three of 17, 17.6%), and EGFR gene amplification (two of 17, 11.7%). Conclusions: The efficacy and safety of combining MET TKIs (crizotinib, capmatinib, or tepotinib) with parent TKIs for acquired MET resistance are efficacious. Radiographic response and AEs did not differ significantly on the basis of the underlying MET TKI used. Loss of MET gene amplification, development of MET on-target mutations, Ras-Raf-MAPK alterations, and EGFR gene amplification were molecular patterns found on progression with dual parent and MET TKI combinations.

Case report: Response to Savolitinib/EGFR-TKI combination in NSCLC patients harboring concurrent primary MET amplification/overexpression and EGFR mutation.

Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer death, accounting for one-third of all cancer deaths worldwide. The MET (c-MET) gene, as one of the therapeutic target spots of NSCLC, has become increasingly more important. MET amplification/overexpression was divided into primary (intrinsic) and secondary (acquired). Studies indicated that the combination of Osimertinib and Savolitinib was safe and showed promising antitumor effect in NSCLC patients with secondary MET amplification after EGFR mutations. However, NSCLC patients with primary MET amplification/overexpression and EGFR mutations are rare in clinics, and the efficacy of dual-target therapy combined with EGFR-TKI and Savolitinib for them has not been studied yet. Here, we reported two NSCLC patients with primary MET amplification/overexpression and EGFR mutation, who benefited from T+S therapy (the dual-target therapy of EGFR-TKI plus Savolitinib) and achieved a progression-free survival (PFS) of approximately 5 months. The two cases indicated that T+S therapy has an acceptable safety profile and encouraging antitumor efficacy in NSCLC patients harboring concurrent primary MET amplification/overexpression and EGFR mutation. Meanwhile, the observation stresses the importance of genetic testing, and the MET gene needs to be detected at first diagnosis for the best choice of targeted therapies.

Phase II study investigating the efficacy and safety of glesatinib (MGCD265) in patients with advanced NSCLC containing MET activating alterations.

OBJECTIVES: Dysregulated signaling by mesenchymal epithelial transition factor (MET) and heightened AXL activation are implicated in the pathogenesis of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Glesatinib (MGCD265) is an investigational, oral inhibitor of MET and AXL. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This open-label, Phase II study investigated glesatinib (free-base suspension [FBS] capsule 1050 mg BID or spray-dried dispersion [SDD] tablet 750 mg BID) in patients with advanced, previously treated NSCLC across four cohorts grouped according to presence of MET activating mutations or amplification in tumor or ctDNA. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR). RESULTS: Sixty-eight patients were enrolled: n = 28 and n = 8 with MET exon 14 skipping mutations in tumor tissue and ctDNA, respectively, and n = 20 and n = 12 with MET gene amplification in tumor tissue and ctDNA, respectively. Overall, ORR was 11.8 %, median progression-free survival was 4.0 months, and median overall survival was 7.0 months. Among patients with MET activating mutations, ORR was 10.7 % with tumor testing and 25.0 % with ctDNA testing. For MET amplification, responses were observed only in patients enrolled by tumor testing (ORR 15.0 %). Diarrhea (82.4 %), nausea (50.0 %), increased alanine aminotransferase (41.2 %), fatigue (38.2 %), and increased aspartate aminotransferase (36.8 %) were the most frequent adverse events assessed as related to study medication. Glesatinib exposure was similar with the SDD tablet and FBS capsule formulations. The study was terminated early by the sponsor due to modest clinical activity. CONCLUSIONS: Glesatinib had an acceptable safety profile in patients with advanced, pre-treated NSCLC with MET activating alterations. Modest clinical activity was observed, which likely reflects suboptimal drug bioavailability suggested by previously reported Phase I data, and pharmacodynamic findings of lower than anticipated increases in circulating soluble shed MET ectodomain (s-MET).

MET alterations detection platforms and clinical implications in solid tumors: a comprehensive review of literature.

MET alterations, including MET exon 14 skipping variants, MET amplification, MET overexpression, and MET fusion, play pivotal roles in primary tumorigenesis and acquired resistance to targeted therapies, especially EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors. They represent important diagnostic, prognostic, and predictive biomarkers in many solid tumor types. However, the detection of MET alterations is challenging due to the complexity of MET alterations and the diversity of platform technologies. Therefore, techniques with high sensitivity, specificity, and reliable molecular detection accuracy are needed to overcome such hindrances and aid in biomarker-guided therapies. The current review emphasizes the role of MET alterations as oncogenic drivers in a variety of cancers and their involvement in the development of resistance to targeted therapies. Moreover, our review provides an overview of and recommendations on the selection of various cross-platform technologies for the detection of MET exon 14 skipping variants, MET amplification, MET overexpression, and MET fusion. Furthermore, challenges and hurdles underlying these common detection platforms are discussed.

Comprehensive NGS profiling to enable detection of ALK gene rearrangements and MET amplifications in non-small cell lung cancer.

Introduction: Next-generation sequencing (NGS) is currently widely used for biomarker studies and molecular profiling to identify concurrent alterations that can lead to the better characterization of a tumor's molecular landscape. However, further evaluation of technical aspects related to the detection of gene rearrangements and copy number alterations is warranted. Methods: There were 12 ALK rearrangement-positive tumor specimens from patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) previously detected via fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), immunohistochemistry (IHC), and an RNA-based NGS assay, and 26 MET high gene copy number (GCN) cases detected by FISH, selected for this retrospective study. All 38 pre-characterized cases were reassessed utilizing the PGDx™ elio™ tissue complete assay, a 505 gene targeted NGS panel, to evaluate concordance with these conventional diagnostic techniques. Results: The detection of ALK rearrangements using the DNA-based NGS assay demonstrated excellent sensitivity with the added benefit of characterizing gene fusion partners and genomic breakpoints. MET copy number alterations were also detected; however, some discordances were observed likely attributed to differences in algorithm, reporting thresholds and gene copy number state. TMB was also assessed by the assay and correlated to the presence of NSCLC driver alterations and was found to be significantly lower in cases with NGS-confirmed canonical driver mutations compared with those without (p=0.0019). Discussion: Overall, this study validates NGS as an accurate approach for detecting structural variants while also highlighting the need for further optimization to enable harmonization across methodologies for amplifications.