The impact of margins and re-resection in pediatric synovial sarcoma.

INTRODUCTION: Synovial sarcoma is one of the most common soft tissue sarcomas in children. Guidelines regarding the adequate extent of resection margins and the role of re-resection are lacking. We sought to evaluate the adequate resection margin and the role of re-resection in predicting outcomes in children with synovial sarcomas. METHODS: A cohort of 36 patients less than 18 years of age at diagnosis who were treated for localized synovial sarcoma at three tertiary pediatric hospitals between January 2004 and December 2020 were included in this study. Patient and tumor demographics, treatment information, and margin status after surgical resection were collected from the medical record. Clinical, treatment, and surgical characteristics, as well as outcomes including hazard ratios (HRs), event-free survival (EFS), and overall survival (OS) were compared by resection margins group and re-resection status. RESULTS: Patients in the R1 resection group were significantly more likely to relapse or die compared to patients in the R0 resection group. However, there was no significant difference in EFS (HR 0.52, p = 0.54) or OS (HR 1.56, p = 0.719) in R0 patients with less than 5 mm margins compared to R0 patients with more than 5 mm margins. Patients with R1 on initial or re-resection had significantly worse OS than patients who had R0 resection on initial or re-resection (HR = 10.12, p = 0.005). CONCLUSION: This study re-affirms that R0 resection is an independent prognostic predictor of better OS/EFS in pediatric synovial sarcoma. Second, our study extends this finding to report negative margins on initial resection or re-resection is associated with better OS/EFS than positive margins on initial resection or re-resection. Lastly, we found that there is no difference in outcomes associated with re-resection or <5 mm margins for R0 patients, indicating that re-resection and <5 mm margins are acceptable if microscopic disease is removed.

Conservative management of inferior vena cava thrombus during nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the impact on survival outcomes of positive vascular margins (PVM) after nephrectomy, open thrombectomy and renal vein ostium resection without inferior vena cava (IVC) segmental resection for nonmetastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Medical records of patients undergoing nephrectomy and open thrombectomy for ccRCC in 1 center were retrospectively reviewed. Baseline characteristics, pathological features and surgery parameters were collected. A Cox uni- and multivariate regression model was used to evaluate the association between common prognosis factors including PVM and survival outcomes. RESULTS: Thirty-nine patients were included. Median age was 65 (55-74) years, mean tumor size was 101±35.7mm, 35/39 (89%) had an infra-diaphragmatic IVC thrombus, and on pathological examination 19 (49%) and 17 (44%) patients had a Fuhrman/ISUP grade 3 and grade 4 ccRCC, respectively, and 23 (59%) had PVM. The median overall survival (OS), cancer specific survival (CSS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were 66, 116 and 28 months, respectively. In the univariate analysis, OS was significantly shorter in case of PVM (HR 4.21, P = 0.01), but there was no significative impact on CSS, local recurrence and DFS. In the multivariate analysis, PVM had no impact on OSS, CSS, local recurrence and DFS, but metastatic lymph nodes were associated with a higher risk of death (HR 4.37, P = 0.015), local recurrence (HR 9.98, P = 0.004) and disease progression (HR 6.09, P = 0.002) and a supra-diaphragmatic thrombus was associated with a higher risk of local recurrence (HR 13.83, P = 0.007) and disease progression (HR 7.77, P = 0.003). CONCLUSION: In a population with a high rate of positive vascular margins, inferior vena cava wall invasion had a minimal impact on survival outcomes. This must be considered regarding the invasiveness of the surgery used for these patients.

Myxoid Liposarcomas of the Thigh: Pre-Operative Presentation, Clinical Outcomes, and Functional Results of Surgical Treatment.

Myxoid liposarcomas are malignant soft-tissue sarcomas whose treatment represents a challenge, even for the most experienced surgeon. In this study, we report on our experience with the treatment of myxoid liposarcomas of the thigh. Our retrospective analysis included myxoid liposarcomas of the thigh treated with surgical resection between 2016 and 2022. Resection margins, complications, local recurrences, and metastases were recorded. The oncological outcome of each case was evaluated at their latest follow-up. Adjuvant therapies were administered according to the ESMO guidelines. Functionality was assessed with the MSTS score before surgery and at the patients' latest follow-up. Thirty cases (ten high-grade and 20 low-grade) were included. The mean diameter was 11.8 cm. Twenty-four cases had wide margins (80%) and six (20%) were marginal. Five cases (60% marginal) had local recurrences (17%). Marginal resection was associated with a higher risk of local recurrence (p = 0.041). Three cases with high-grade tumors (10%) developed metastases. At the patients' latest follow-up, their mean MSTS score had risen from 22.9 to 27.3. While tumor grade influences the risk of metastases, the quality of resection margins can determine the local recurrence rate. An adequate surgery can lead to good post-operative functional outcomes.

Achieving negative superficial resection margins with NBI and white light in carcinoma oral cavity: Could it be a norm?

INTRODUCTION: In India, oral cavity cancer rates are the highest, largely due to tobacco and areca nut use. The primary goal of oncologic surgery is complete tumor resection with adequate margins, yet no accepted guidelines exist margin identification. NBI enhances mucosal lesion detection and may improve margin assessment in OSCC. AIMS: This study aims to evaluate the proportion of negative superficial resection margins using NBI and to compare these results with margins assessed using white light (WL) examination. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study at AIIMS, Rishikesh, included 38 patients with T1-T3 biopsy-proven OSCC. Surgical margins were marked using WL and NBI. Histopathology classified margins as clear (>5mm), close (1-5 mm), or involved. Sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values of NBI were calculated. RESULTS: The average NBI examination duration was 227 s. Negative margins were achieved in 68.42 % (>5mm) and 78.94 % (>3mm) of NBI cases, compared to 71.05 % and 84.21 % for WL. NBI had a sensitivity of 12.50 %, specificity of 96.67 %, and overall accuracy of 78.95 %. DISCUSSION: NBI showed high specificity but low sensitivity. This could be due to the smaller number of patients in NBI positive group. In the present study, the single positive margin identified with NBI could also have been detected with the combined approach of white light and palpation, ensuring that no positive margins were missed. CONCLUSION: NBI can complement WL for margin assessment in oral SCC but requires a long learning curve and a dedicated team. Integrating NBI into standard protocols could improve surgical outcomes and reduce recurrence.

Identifying Factors Predicting Margin Status After Mastectomy.

INTRODUCTION: A positive margin after mastectomy increases the risk of breast cancer recurrence and the morbidity associated with re-excision or chest wall irradiation. This study aimed to identify factors that may predict margin status after mastectomy. METHODS: Women with Tis-T3 breast cancers who underwent mastectomy from 2014 to 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. Comparisons of clinicopathologic data were made between patients with negative margins (> 1 mm) and close (≤ 1 mm) or positive margins. RESULTS: Of 938 women who underwent mastectomy, negative margins were reported for 794 (85%) women, while 144 (15%) women experienced close (97/144, 10%) or positive (47/144, 5%) margins. Re-excision of margins was performed in 37 (26%) of those patients, and 9 (24%) had residual cancer after re-excision. On multivariate analysis, increasing age (odds ratio [OR] 0.97, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.96-0.99, p = 0.002), increased body mass index (BMI; OR 0.97, 95% CI 0.93-1.00, p = 0.049), and neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC; OR 0.44, 95% CI 0.25-0.79, p = 0.006) decreased the risk of close or positive margins. Tumors located in the lower inner quadrant (OR 3.83, 95% CI 1.90-7.72, p < 0.001), multifocal tumors (OR 1.78, 95% CI 1.19-2.66, p = 0.005), immediate reconstruction (OR 1.63, 95% CI 1.03-2.58, p = 0.039), and a preoperative tumor to breast volume ratio > 4.14 (OR 2.66, 95% CI 1.43-4.94, p = 0.002) significantly increased the risk of close or positive margins. CONCLUSIONS: Age, BMI, tumor location, multifocality, NAC, immediate reconstruction, and tumor to breast volume ratio independently predicted margin status after mastectomy. These data should be considered when counseling women considering mastectomy.

Bicenter validation of a risk model for the preoperative prediction of extraprostatic extension of localized prostate cancer combining clinical and multiparametric MRI parameters.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to validate a previously published risk model (RM) which combines clinical and multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) parameters to predict extraprostatic extension (EPE) of prostate cancer (PC) prior to radical prostatectomy (RP). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A previously published RM combining clinical with mpMRI parameters including European Society of Urogenital Radiology (ESUR) classification for EPE was retrospectively evaluated in a cohort of two urological university hospitals in Germany. Consecutive patients (n = 205, January 2015 -June 2021) with available preoperative MRI images, clinical information including PSA, prostate volume, ESUR classification for EPE, histopathological results of MRI-fusion biopsy and RP specimen were included. Validation was performed by receiver operating characteristic analysis and calibration plots. The RM's performance was compared to ESUR criteria. RESULTS: Histopathological T3 stage was detected in 43% of the patients (n = 89); 45% at Essen and 42% at Düsseldorf. Discrimination performance between pT2 and pT3 of the RM in the entire cohort was AUC = 0.86 (AUC = 0.88 at site 1 and AUC = 0.85 at site 2). Calibration was good over the entire probability range. The discrimination performance of ESUR classification alone was comparable (AUC = 0.87). CONCLUSIONS: The RM showed good discriminative performance to predict EPE for decision-making for RP as a patient-tailored risk stratification. However, when experienced MRI reading is available, standardized MRI reading with ESUR scoring is comparable regarding information outcome. A main limitation is the potentially limited transferability to other populations because of the high prevalence of EPE in our subgroups.

Risk Factors for Positive Resection Margins in Breast-Conserving Surgery for Breast Cancer-Retrospective Analysis.

The primary objective of this study was to identify preoperative factors that could be associated with positive resection margins. We also tried to analyze the local recurrence and overall survival in patients who received conservative treatment for early-stage breast cancer and correlate these parameters with preoperative factors. A retrospective examination was conducted on the medical records and pathological reports of 143 patients who underwent breast-conserving surgery (BCS) for breast cancer in our department from 2009 to 2017. Postoperative outcomes were assessed through phone contact and statistical analyses, including GraphPad Prism, and Fisher's exact test, the Chi-square test, and the log-rank test were employed. The results revealed positive resection margins in 7.69% (11 cases) of the 143 patients, with an overall mortality rate of 16.66% for those with positive margins and 6.59% for those with negative margins. Statistical analysis indicated no significant differences in the overall (p = 0.5) or specific (p = 0.53) survival between the positive and negative margin groups. The positive margins were significantly associated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (p < 0.0001) and the presence of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) (p = 0.01). Among the analyzed factors, two out of sixteen were significantly linked to positive resection margins in BCS, emphasizing their importance in surgical management planning for early-stage breast cancer.

Conservative Management of Vulvar Cancer-Where Should We Draw the Line?

Vulvar cancer is a rare disease, and cure rates were low until the mid-20th century. The introduction of an en bloc radical vulvectomy and bilateral groin and pelvic lymph node dissection saw them rise from 15-20% to 60-70%. However, this very radical surgery was associated with high physical and psychological morbidity. Wounds were usually left open to granulate, and the average post-operative hospital stay was about 90 days. Many attempts have been made to decrease morbidity without compromising survival. Modifications that have proven to be successful are as follows: (i) the elimination of routine pelvic node dissection, (ii) the use of separate incisions for groin dissection, (iii) the use of unilateral groin dissection for lateral, unifocal lesions, (iv) and radical local excision with 1 cm surgical margins for unifocal lesions. Sentinel node biopsy with ultrasonic groin surveillance for patients with node-negative disease has been the most recent modification and is advocated for patients whose primary cancer is <4 cm in diameter. Controversy currently exists around the need for 1 cm surgical margins around all primary lesions and on the appropriate ultrasonic surveillance for patients with negative sentinel nodes.

Trends and Future Directions in Margin Analysis for Head and Neck Cancers.

Margin status in head and neck cancer has important prognostic implications. Currently, resection is based on manual palpation and gross visualization followed by intraoperative specimen or tumor bed-based margin analysis using frozen sections. While generally effective, this protocol has several limitations including margin sampling and close and positive margin re-localization. There is a lack of evidence on the association of use of frozen section analysis with improved survival in head and neck cancer. This article reviews novel technologies in head and neck margin analysis such as 3-dimensional scanning, augmented reality, molecular margins, optical imaging, spectroscopy, and artificial intelligence.

Deep margin elevation with one-year follow-up: A case report.

Deep margin elevation (DME) is a conservative treatment of a tooth with extensive subgingival caries. It is an alternative approach to more invasive restorative procedures. The DME enables successful tooth isolation to do root canal treatments and enables performing indirect restorations, improving dental function and patient comfort without complications.

Parameters to assess the necessity of adjuvant therapy for early-stage oral squamous cell carcinoma.

OBJECTIVE: One-third of head and neck squamous cell carcinomas are early-stage oral cavity squamous cell carcinomas (OCSCC). Despite a high curative rate, 20% of early-stage OCSCC patients do not achieve long-term survival. This study evaluates the role of adjuvant therapy (ADJ) in delaying disease progression and prolonging survival. METHODS: This single-institute retrospective cohort study enrolled 481 early-stage OCSCC patients, 16% (78/481) of whom received ADJ. It was reported according to the STROBE guidelines. Cox proportional hazards regression and Kaplan-Meier survival curves were employed to identify suitable candidates for ADJ. RESULTS: The 5-year locoregional recurrence-free survival (LR-RFS) and overall survival rates were 73.2% and 84.9%, respectively. Positive margins and advanced depth of invasion (DOI) were independent predictors of LR-RFS. For patients with positive margins, adjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) was superior to adjuvant radiotherapy alone in improving LR-RFS (hazard ratios for adjuvant CRT vs. none, 0.042; adjuvant radiotherapy alone vs. none, 0.702). Excluding positive margins, advanced DOI was the most critical factor in assessing the need for ADJ. Positive margins and advanced DOI were more appropriate criteria than EORTC 22931/RTOG 9501 for evaluating adjuvant CRT. CONCLUSIONS: Adjuvant CRT was indicated for patients with positive margins and advanced DOI to improve survival outcomes.

Surgical Management of Equine Neoplasia.

Equine neoplasia poses challenges in surgical management owing to their diverse locations and potential for aggressive behavior. Surgical interventions aim for complete excision while minimizing cosmetic and functional impairments. Techniques such as laser ablation and electrochemotherapy offer minimally invasive options for accessible tumors. For deeper or larger masses, surgical excision with adequate margins remains the gold standard. Preoperative biopsy and imaging guides surgical planning, ensuring complete tumor removal while preserving vital structures. Close adherence to a strict surgical protocol to prevent seeding of tumor cells, and, where possible, appropriate skin reconstruction techniques will improve cosmesis and outcome.

"The correlation between histopathological pattern and surgical treatment for palatal pleomorphic adenoma. Can we choose a more conservative approach?"

Pleomorphic adenoma (PA) is the most prevalent benign salivary gland tumor. Although rare, among the minor salivary glands, palatal PA exhibits the highest incidence. Unlike other benign tumors, PA infiltrates the surrounding tissues, posing challenges for complete removal through conservative measures. Surgeons often resort to aggressive surgical procedures involving resection of adjacent tissue to ensure clear margins and prevent recurrence. This study aims to analyze diverse histological characteristics of palatal PA, seeking statistical correlations for early prediction of tumor aggressiveness. The goal is to facilitate the preservation of the periosteum during surgical resection and attain conservative surgical margins. A retrospective histopathological investigation encompassed 18 patients diagnosed with palatal PA who underwent surgical treatment at Hadassah Medical Centre, Jerusalem, Israel. Evaluated parameters included tumor size, pseudocapsule thickness, tumor-periosteum distance, and the presence of pseudopodia and satellite nodules indicating tumor penetration. Statistical significance was set at P < 0.05. Tumors of varying sizes, whether large or small, lack consistent features. Neither tumor size, pseudocapsule thickness, nor tumor-periosteum distance displayed correlations with tumor penetration features. Palatal PA exhibits varied histological attributes impacting surgical technique. The absence of correlations among these attributes impedes early prediction of tumor aggressiveness, casting doubt on periosteum preservation. The periosteum is sufficiently robust to contain the tumor and should be excised. There is no data to support either ostectomy or a through-and-through surgical resection as part of the treatment.

Is a 3 mm Surgical Margin Safe for Basal Cell Carcinoma in the Head and Neck that is Less than 2 cm, Considering Different Risk Factors?

Background Basal cell carcinoma (BCC) is the most common type of nonmelanoma skin cancer. Typically, resection requires a safety margin of ≥4 mm. When removing tumor cells, achieving complete excision with minimal safety margins and reconstructing the defect to preserve the original appearance are important. In this study, we used a 3-mm resection margin to confirm recurrence and re-resection rates. Methods Electronic medical records and photographic data were obtained for patients with primary BCC lesions less than 2 cm in diameter who underwent wide excision with a 3-mm surgical margin from January 2015 to November 2021. We analyzed factors determining recurrence and re-resection rates, such as tumor size, location, age, sex, underlying diseases (including immunosuppression state), ethnicity, subtypes, tumor borders, etc. Results This study included 205 patients. The mean age and follow-up period were 73.0 ± 11.5 years and 10.2 ± 8.0 months, respectively. The recurrence and re-resection rates were 1.95% and 25.85%, respectively. A statistically significant correlation was found between recurrence rate and tumor border ( p = 0.013) and the re-resection rate was correlated statistically with location ( p = 0.022) and immunosuppressed patients ( p = 0.006). Conclusion We found that a 3-mm excision margin provided sufficient safety in small facial BCC, resulting in ease of surgery and better aesthetic outcomes. However, surgical margins must be determined case by case by integrating various patient factors. In particular, a surgical margin of ≥4 mm is required for BCC in high-risk areas, immunosuppressed patients, or poorly defined border.

Changing times: trends in risk classification, tumor upstaging, and positive surgical margins after radical prostatectomy - results from a contemporary National Cancer Database study.

PURPOSE: Recent advancements in screening, prostate MRI, robotic surgery, and active surveillance have influenced the profile of patients undergoing radical prostatectomy (RP). We sought to examine their impact on trends in clinicodemographic, risk classification, and adverse pathology in men undergoing surgery. METHODS: We queried the National Cancer Database for clinicodemographic, risk group, and pathology data in men undergoing upfront RP between 2006 and 2020. Patients were categorized by NCCN risk groups, and trends were assessed among 2006-2010, 2011-2015, and 2016-2020 periods. Endpoints included rates of pT3, positive surgical margins (PSM), pathologic upstaging, and Gleason grade group (GG) upgrading. RESULTS: 610,762 patients were included. There were significant increases in African Americans (9.8-14.1%), comorbidities (2.1-5.2% with Charlson scores > 1), and robot-assisted RP (78-84%). Over the three time periods, high-risk cases increased from 15 to 20 to 27%, and intermediate-risk from 54 to 51 to 60%. Overall rates of pT3 rose from 20 to 38%, and PSM from 20 to 27% (p < 0.001). Pathologic upstaging increased in low (6-15%), intermediate (20-33%), and high-risk groups (42-58%) -p < 0.001. Gleason upgrading rose in low-risk (45-59%, p < 0.001), with slight reductions in the intermediate and high-risk groups. CONCLUSIONS: Recent trends in RP indicate a shift towards more advanced disease, evidenced by increasing rates of pT3, PSM, and pathologic upstaging across all NCCN risk groups. These findings emphasize the need for a careful balance in applying fascia and nerve-sparing techniques to avoid compromising oncological safety.

A Rare Case of Eccrine Carcinoma Demonstrating Intracranial Invasion in a Patient With Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

Eccrine carcinoma (EC) is a rare intraepidermal carcinoma of the eccrine sweat glands. Even more rare are instances of EC exhibiting intracranial invasion. Here, we describe the case of a metachronous EC mass demonstrating intracranial invasion in a patient with advanced-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), reporting CT head findings of a left frontal skull expansile destructive mass with soft tissue density and immunostain findings of the following: CEA: positive, granular, EMA: positive, AE1/AE3: positive, CK7: strongly positive, CK20: negative, GCDFP: negative, and HEPAR: negative. The only recommended treatment for EC is surgical excision with tumor-free margins, and no chemotherapy protocols currently exist. Due to socioeconomic factors, our patient was unable to receive adequate treatment for her HCC, nor surgical excision for her EC. However, the unique presentation of a rare intracranial EC tumor causing no neurological deficits in a patient with untreated HCC merits the need for a more thorough identification of secondary tumors via biopsy in patients with HCC to identify possible associations between these two tumors in future patients.

Intraoperative margin assessment during radical prostatectomy: is microscopy frozen in time or ready for digital defrost?

Intraoperative frozen section (IFS) is used with the intention to improve functional and oncological outcomes for patients undergoing radical prostatectomy (RP). High resource requirements of IFS techniques such as NeuroSAFE may preclude widespread adoption, even if there are benefits to patients. Recent advances in fresh-tissue microscopic digital imaging technologies may offer an attractive alternative, and there is a growing body of evidence regarding these technologies. In this narrative review, we discuss some of the familiar limitations of IFS and compare these to the attractive counterpoints of modern digital imaging technologies such as the speed and ease of image generation, the locality of equipment within (or near) the operating room, the ability to maintain tissue integrity, and digital transfer of images. Confocal laser microscopy (CLM) is the modality most frequently reported in the literature for margin assessment during RP. We discuss several imitations and obstacles to widespread dissemination of digital imaging technologies. Among these, we consider how the 'en-face' margin perspective will challenge urologists and pathologists to understand afresh the meaning of positive margin significance. As a part of this, discussions on how to describe, categorize, react to, and evaluate these technologies are needed to improve patient outcomes. Limitations of this review include its narrative structure and that the evidence base in this field is relatively immature but developing at pace.

Centralized prostatectomy with intraoperative NeuroSAFE margin assessment improves surgical margin control.

AIMS: To investigate the surgical margin status in patients with prostate cancer who underwent robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) with intraoperative neurovascular structure-adjacent frozen-section analysis (NeuroSAFE) and evaluate differences compared to patients who underwent radical prostatectomy without NeuroSAFE. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between September 2018 and January 2021, 962 patients underwent centralized RARP with NeuroSAFE. A secondary resection was performed in case of a positive surgical margin (PSM) on intraoperative frozen section (IFS) analysis to convert a PSM into a negative surgical margin (NSM). A retrospective cohort consisted of 835 patients who had undergone radical prostatectomy in a tertiary centre without NeuroSAFE between January 2000 and December 2017. We performed multivariable logistic regression to evaluate differences in risk of PSM between cohorts after controlling for clinicopathological variables. RESULTS: Patients operated with NeuroSAFE in the centralized clinic had 29% PSM at a definitive pathological RP examination. The median cumulative length of definitive PSM was 1.1 mm (interquartile range: 0.4-3.8). Among 275 men with PSM, 136 (49%) had a cumulative length ≤1 mm and 198 (72%) ≤3 mm. After controlling for PSA, Grade group, cribriform pattern, pT-stage, and pN-stage, patients treated in the centralized clinic with NeuroSAFE had significantly lower odds on PSM (odds ratio [OR]: 0.70, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.56-0.88; P = 0.002), PSM length >1 mm (OR: 0.14, 95% CI: 0.09-0.22; P < 0.001), and >3 mm (OR: 0.21, 95% CI: 0.14-0.30; P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: This study provides a detailed overview of surgical margin status in a centralized RP NeuroSAFE cohort. Centralization with NeuroSAFE was associated with lower PSM rates and significantly shorter PSM cumulative lengths, indicating improved control of surgical margin status.