Anterior bone tunnel position increases meniscus migration in medial meniscus posterior root repair: A cadaveric study of suture length changes.

Purpose: This study investigated differences in the migration of meniscus sutured with pull-out sutures for treating medial meniscus posterior root tears (MMPRTs) according to the bone tunnel position, using cadaveric knees. Methods: Six knees of three donors fixed using Thiel's method were included in this study. The MMPRTs were created, and a single suture was performed at the torn meniscus using an arthroscopic procedure. The suture was pulled out through the tibial bone tunnel, and the meniscus displacement was measured as the change in length during 0-120° of knee flexion. Three types of bone tunnels (anatomical, anterior and posterior) were created for each knee, and the sutures were pulled out of each tunnel three times. After completing all measurements, the proximal tibia was extracted and micro-computed tomography was performed to evaluate the tunnel position. Results: A significantly smaller change in suture length was observed in the posterior group compared to the other two groups (anatomical group, 5.17 ± 1.8 mm; anterior group, 7.50 ± 3.2 mm; posterior group, 1.17 ± 1.0 mm; p > 0.01). In addition, a significant correlation between the anteroposterior tunnel position and suture length change was observed (r = -0.720; p = 0.001). Conclusions: When pull-out sutures were used to repair MMPRTs, the suture length change was approximately 5 mm during knee flexion and extension when the bone tunnel was located at the anatomical attachment site. This change was larger when the tunnel position was anterior, and smaller when the tunnel position was posterior. Level of Evidence: LEVEL Ⅲ case-control study.

Lateral meniscus posterior root repairs show superior healing, reduced meniscal extrusion and improved clinical outcomes compared to medial meniscus posterior root repairs: A systematic review.

PURPOSE: To systematically review and summarize the available literature on (1) postoperative healing rates, meniscal extrusion (ME) and clinical outcomes following lateral (LMPRR) versus medial (MMPRR) root repair and (2) potential correlations between residual ME and healing outcomes. METHODS: A comprehensive literature search was conducted using the Scopus, PubMed and Embase databases. Clinical studies evaluating healing status on second-look arthroscopy and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) after LMPRR and MMPRR were included. Study quality was assessed using the Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies criteria and the modified Coleman Methodology Score. RESULTS: Twenty-three studies comprising 871 patients with LMPRR (n = 406) and MMPRR (n = 465) were included. Overall, 223 (54.9% of total) and 149 (32.04% of total) patients underwent second-look arthroscopy in the LMPRR and MMPRR groups, respectively. Complete root healing was observed in 190 (85.2%) patients in the LMPRR group versus 78 (52.3%) in the MMPRR group (p < 0.001). There were six (2.7%) failed repairs in the LMPRR group compared to 21 (14.09%) in the MMPRR group (p < 0.001). On postoperative MRI, 109 (75.7%) root repairs were healed in the LMPRR group compared to 192 (53.3%) in the MMPRR group (p < 0.001). Failure rates were lower after all-inside and transtibial pullout repairs in the LMPRR group but higher in the MMPRR group, with no significant mean difference between preoperative and postoperative ME in the MMPRR group (p = 0.95). Significantly better clinical outcomes were observed in the LMPRR group compared to the MMPRR group. A greater degree of postoperative ME was associated with lower healing rates (R = -0.78, p < 0.0005). Postoperative ME did not influence clinical outcomes (R = 0.28, p = 0.29). CONCLUSIONS: Lateral meniscus posterior root repairs showed higher healing rates compared to MMPRR on both second-look arthroscopy and postoperative MRI. Meniscal extrusion decreased after LMPRR but not after MMPRR. Greater residual ME correlated inversely with healing rates, as more extrusion was associated with lower healing. Postoperative clinical improvement did not affect ME or healing status. STUDY DESIGN: Systematic review of level III and IV studies. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV.

Qualitative Magnetic Resonance Imaging Assessment of the Semimembranosus Tendon in Patients with Medial Meniscal Tears.

BACKGROUND: To determine if there is an association between semimembranosus tendinosis and medial meniscal tears using MRI. METHODS: A retrospective review of knee 3T MRI scans was performed to determine the presence or absence of medial meniscal tears in patients with semimembranosus tendinosis. All studies were interpreted by two musculoskeletal radiologists. Univariate association for the presence of semimembranosus tendinosis and medial meniscal tears was performed with a Chi-square test followed by logistic regression modelling among statistically significant associations. RESULTS: A total of 150 knee MRI scans were reviewed (age 32.8 ± 7.1 years; 70 females). Semimembranosus tendinosis was present in 66 knees (44%) in the patient population. Semimembranosus tendinosis was present in 81% of patients with meniscal tears versus 36% of patients without meniscal tears (p < 0.0001). This association remained statistically significant when adjusted for age and sex with an adjusted odds ratio of 7.0 (p < 0.0003). Models adjusted for the above covariates and containing the interaction term produced an adjusted odds ratio of 13.0 (p < 0.0001) in men, while in women this association was non-significant with an adjusted odds ratio of 2.0 (p = 0.42). CONCLUSIONS: Subjects with semimembranosus tendinosis were seven times more likely to have medial meniscal tears even when adjusting for sex and age. This could help guide the appropriate postmeniscal repair rehabilitation protocol.

Arthroscopic Centralization of the Medial Meniscus Reduces Load on a Posterior Root Repair Under Dynamic Varus Loading: A Biomechanical Investigation.

BACKGROUND: In addition to the integrity of the meniscal hoop function, both the anterior and posterior meniscus roots as well as the meniscotibial and meniscofemoral ligaments are crucial in restraining meniscal extrusion. However, the interaction and load sharing between the roots and these peripheral attachments (PAs) are not known. PURPOSES: To investigate the influence of an insufficiency of the PAs on the forces acting on a posterior medial meniscus root repair (PMMRR) in both neutral and varus alignment and to explore whether meniscal centralization reduces these forces. STUDY DESIGN: Controlled laboratory study. METHODS: In 8 fresh-frozen human cadaveric knees, an arthroscopic transosseous root repair (step 1) was performed after sectioning the posterior root of the medial meniscus. The pull-out suture was connected to a load cell to allow measurement of the forces acting on the root repair. A medial closing-wedge distal femoral osteotomy was performed to change the mechanical axis from neutral to 5° of varus alignment. The meniscus was completely released from its PAs (step 2), followed by transosseous arthroscopic centralization (step 3). Each step was tested in both neutral and varus alignment. The specimens were subjected to nondestructive dynamic varus loading under axial compression of 300 N in 0°, 15°, 30°, 45°, and 60° flexion. The changes in force acting on the PMMRR were statistically analyzed using a mixed linear model. RESULTS: Axial loading in neutral alignment led to an increase of the force of root repair of 3.1 ± 3.1 N (in 0° flexion) to 6.3 ± 4.4 N (in 60° flexion). In varus alignment, forces increased significantly from 30° (3.5 N; 95% CI, 1.1-5.8 N; P = .01) to 60° (7.1 N; 95% CI, 2.7-11.5 N; P = .007) flexion, in comparison with neutral alignment. Cutting of the PAs in neutral alignment led to a significant increase of root repair forces in all flexion angles, from 7.0 N (95% CI, 1.0-13.0 N; P = .02) to 9.1 N (95% CI, 4.1-14.1 N; P = .003), in comparison with the intact state. Varus alignment significantly increased the forces in the cut states from 4.8 N (95% CI, 1.0-8.5 N; P = .02) to 11.1 N (95% CI, 4.2-18.0 N; P = .006) from 30° to 60° flexion, in comparison with the neutral alignment. Arthroscopic centralization led to restoration of the native forces in both neutral and varus alignment, with no significant differences between the centralized and intact states. CONCLUSION: An insufficiency of the PAs of the medial meniscus, as well as varus alignment, led to increased forces acting on a PMMRR. These forces were reduced via an arthroscopic meniscal centralization. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Performing arthroscopic meniscal centralization concomitantly with PMMRR may reduce failure of the repair by reducing the load of the root.

Partial weight-bearing and range of motion limitation significantly reduce the loads at medial meniscus posterior root repair sutures in a cadaveric biomechanical model.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to investigate the influence of medial meniscus posterior root avulsion (MMPRA) before and after surgical treatment on the biomechanics of the knee joint, including suture repair forces during daily and crutch-assisted gait movements. METHODS: MMPRA were investigated in eight human cadaver knee joint specimens by a dynamic knee joint simulator with daily (normal gait, gait with additional rotational movement, standing up, sitting down) and rehabilitation-associated movements (crutch-assisted gait with limited flexion range of motion [30°] and 30% [toe-touch weight-bearing, TTWB] and 50% of body weight [partial weight-bearing, PWB]) with simulated physiologic muscle forces. Each specimen was tested in intact, torn and repaired (transtibial suture) state. The biomechanical parameters were: medial mean contact pressure and area, knee joint kinematics, medial displacement of the posterior meniscus horn and loading on the anchoring suture. RESULTS: Significant reduction of the contact area due to the avulsion was observed in all movements except for PWB and sitting down. MMPRA repair significantly increased the contact areas during all movements, bringing them to levels statistically indistinguishable from the initial state. MMPRA resulted in a medial displacement up to 12.8 mm (sitting down) and could be reattached with a residual displacement ranging from 0.7 mm (PWB) to 5.7 mm (standing up), all significantly (p < 0.001) reduced compared to the torn state. The mean peak anchoring suture load increased from TTWB (77 N), PWB (91 N) to normal gait (194 N), gait rotation (207 N), sitting (201 N; p < 0.01) and to standing up (232 N; p = 0.03). CONCLUSION: Surgical treatment of MMPRA allows restoration of physiological knee joint biomechanics. Crutch-assisted movements reduce the loading of the repair suture, thus likewise the risk for failure. From a biomechanical point of view, crutch-assisted movements are recommended for the early rehabilitation phase after MMPRA repair. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level V.

Long-term Outcomes of Partial Meniscectomy for Degenerative Medial Meniscus Posterior Root Tears.

Background: Previous studies have demonstrated that medial meniscus posterior root tear (MMPRT) repair is superior to debridement in terms of patient-reported outcomes, rates of conversion to total knee arthroplasty (TKA), and long-term costs. Despite the known poor midterm outcomes, there is a paucity of long-term results of partial meniscectomy for degenerative MMPRTs. Purpose: To 1) evaluate long-term patient-reported and radiographic outcomes of patients who underwent partial medial meniscectomy (PMM) for MMPRTs, and 2) determine the rate of and risk factors for conversion to total knee TKA. Study Design: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: A previously identified cohort of 26 patients treated with partial meniscectomy for isolated MMPRTs between 2005 and 2013 was prospectively followed for long-term outcomes at a minimum 10-year follow-up. Patients were evaluated for International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) outcome score, reoperation, and conversion to TKA. Failure was defined as conversion to arthroplasty or a severely abnormal IKDC subjective score <75.4. Results: This study included 26 patients (10 men, 16 women; mean age, 54 ± 8.7 years [range, 38-71 years] at diagnosis; body mass index, 32.9 ± 5.5) who were followed for a mean of 14.0 ± 3.6 years (range, 10.1-19.6 years). At the final follow-up, 1 patient was deceased and 18 (72%) of the remaining 25 patients had progressed to TKA, with 1 (4%) patient undergoing repeat meniscectomy. The 6 (24%) patients who had not progressed to TKA or revision surgery reported a mean IKDC score of 57 ± 23. Nineteen patients underwent subsequent surgery and 5 demonstrated severely abnormal IKDC scores resulting in a clinical failure rate of 96% (24 of the 25 living patients) at a mean 14-year follow-up. Conclusion: PMM for medial meniscus posterior horn root tears demonstrated 72% progression to TKA and 96% failure according to subjective clinical outcomes at a minimum 10-year follow-up.

[High tibial osteotomy on varus knee osteoarthritis with medial meniscus posterior root injury].

OBJECTIVE: To explore clinical effect of distal tibial tubercle-high tibial osteotomy (DTT-HTO) in treating knee osteoarthritis (KOA) with medial meniscus posterior root tear (MMPRT). METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed on 21 patients with varus KOA with MMPRT from May 2020 to December 2021, including 3 males and 18 females, aged from 49 to 75 years old with an average of (63.81±6.56) years old, the courses of disease ranged from 0.5 to 18.0 years with an average of(5.9±4.2) years, and 4 patients with grade Ⅱ, 14 patients with grade Ⅲ, and 3 patients with grade Ⅳ according to Kellgren-Lawrence;14 patients with type 1 and 7 patients with type 2 according to MMPRT damage classification. The distance of medial meniscusextrusion (MME) and weight-bearing line ratio (WBLR) of lower extremity were compared before and 12 months after operation. Visual analogue scale (VAS), Western Ontarioand and McMaster Universities (WOMAC) osteoarthritis index, and Lysholm knee score were used to evaluate knee pain and functional improvement before operation, 1, 6 and 12 months after operation, respectively. RESULTS: Twenty-one patients were followed up for 12 to 18 months with an average of (13.52±1.72) months. MME distance was improved from (4.99±1.05) mm before operation to (1.87±0.76) mm at 12 months after operation (P<0.05). WBLR was increased from (15.49±7.04)% before operation to (62.71±2.27)% at 12 months after operation (P<0.05). VAS was decreased from (7.00±1.14) before operation to (2.04±0.80), (0.90±0.62) and (0.61±0.50) at 1, 6 and 12 months after operation. WOMAC were decreased from preoperative (147.90±9.88) to postoperative (103.43±8.52), (74.00±9.54) and (47.62±9.53) at 1, 6 and 12 months, and the difference were statistically significant (P<0.05). Lysholm scores were increased from (46.04±7.34) before oepration to (63.19±8.93), (81.10±6.41) and (89.29±3.04) at 1, 6 and 12 months after operation(P<0.05). CONCLUSION: For the treatment of varus KOA with MMPRT, DTT-HTO could reduce medial meniscus protrusion distance, improve the ratio of lower limb force line, and effectively reduce knee pain and improve knee joint function.

Failure rate of isolated medial meniscus repair in the stable knee: Systematic review and meta-analysis.

PURPOSE: The present meta-analysis aims to determine the outcomes and failure rates for medial meniscus repairs in patients with stable knees. METHODS: A literature search was conducted using PubMed and Scopus with the terms '(medial meniscus OR medial meniscal) AND (repair)'. The search strategy was based on the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Meta-Analyses) protocol and included 93 articles assessed for eligibility. The search criteria were limited to studies reporting outcomes and failure rates. The exclusion criteria included languages other than English, biomechanical studies, letters to editors, non-full text, review articles, meta-analyses and case reports. RESULTS: In total, 10 studies with 595 patients were included. Degenerative tears or studies reporting meniscus repair outcomes on root repairs, revision or primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, discoid menisci or ramp lesions were excluded. All studies included revision surgery and/or clinical symptoms as failure definitions. The overall medial meniscal repair failure rate was 26% with a 95% confidence interval (CI) [15%-37%]. The mean time to failure from isolated medial meniscus repair surgery was 27.7 months with 95% CI [18.5-36.9 months]. The postoperative Lysholm and IKDC scores were reported in three articles. At the final follow-up, the mean postoperative Lysholm and IKDC scores were 92.3 with 95% CI [84.5-100] and 88.6 with 95% CI [83.5-93.8], respectively. CONCLUSION: The current meta-analysis revealed an overall failure rate of 26% in the case of medial meniscus repair in a stable knee. For these reasons, the patient should be aware of the substantial risk of revision surgery (one out of four cases). Medial meniscus repair in a stable knee yielded good clinical results. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II.

Single-bundle ACL combined with ALL reconstruction yields comparable outcomes in patients with varied anatomical risk factors for ACL graft failure.

BACKGROUND: Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) graft failure is influenced by factors such as meniscal tears and tibial plateau slope. Combined anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) and anterolateral ligament (ALL) reconstruction has reduced failure rates; however, its efficacy in high-risk patients remains unclear. This study hypothesized that combined ACL and ALL reconstruction would yield similar clinical outcomes in patients with varying risks of ACL failure. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 76 patients who underwent primary single-bundle ACL reconstruction combined with ALL reconstruction between June 2018 and June 2021 were included. The medial tibial slope (MTS), lateral tibial slope (LTS), and anterior tibial translation (ATT) were measured using magnetic resonance imaging and plain radiography of the knee joint. The meniscal lesions were assessed during surgery. Preoperative clinical assessments and final follow-up were conducted using patient-reported outcome measurements (PROMs), including the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) evaluation, Lysholm knee scoring scale, and Tegner Activity scale. PROMs were collected at least two years postoperatively. RESULTS: The average follow-up was 32.5 ± 7.4 months. There were no significant differences in postoperative IKDC score, Lysholm score, or Tegner activity score between patients with or without medial meniscus injury (p = 0.155, 0.914, and 0.042, respectively), with or without lateral meniscus injury (p = 0.737, 0.569, and 0.942, respectively), medial tibial slope > 12° or ≤ 12° (p = 0.290, 0.496, and 0.988, respectively), or lateral tibial slope > 7.4° or ≤ 7.4° (p = 0.213, 0.625, and 0.922, respectively). No significant correlations were found between anterior tibial translation and postoperative IKDC (R = -0.058, p = 0.365), Lysholm (R = -0.017, p = 0.459), or Tegner activity scores (R = -0.147, p = 0.189). CONCLUSION: Our study demonstrates that single-bundle ACL reconstruction combined with ALL reconstruction provides reliable and comparable clinical outcomes in patients with high-risk factors for ACL graft failure, such as increased tibial slope or meniscal injury. Our results suggest that the indications for ALL reconstruction may be expanded to include patients with a high tibial slope or meniscal injury, because these factors have been shown to contribute to increased rotational instability and high rates of ACL graft failure. Future prospective randomized controlled trials with large patient cohorts and long follow-up periods are needed to validate these findings and establish clear guidelines for patient selection and surgical decision-making. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 3.

Evaluation of the usefulness of non-weight-bearing tunnel view using X-ray in the short term after medial meniscus posterior root tear onset: a retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to examine whether the non-weight-bearing tunnel view X-ray is effective for short-term evaluation of medial meniscus posterior root tear (MMPRT) by assessing the X-ray characteristics at the initial and follow-up visits. METHODS: This was a retrospective longitudinal study of 26 enrolled knees diagnosed with MMPRT on magnetic resonance imaging. The distance between the medial tibial eminence and medial femoral condyle (MTE-MFC distance) and medial tibiofemoral joint (MTFJ) width were measured by obtaining non-weight-bearing tunnel view and frontal view X-ray radiographs. The initial and follow-up values at a median interval of 17 days were compared. Additionally, the correlations between the MTE-MFC distance increase rate and body mass index (BMI), age, femorotibial angle (FTA), and posterior tibial slope (PTS) were evaluated using linear regression analysis. RESULTS: The tunnel view images of the initial and follow-up X-rays showed a significant increase in the MTE-MFC distance and a significant decrease in the MTFJ width. Furthermore, a moderate correlation was observed between the change in the MTE-MFC distance and the time interval between X-rays. However, no substantial correlation was observed for the change in the MTFJ width over time. Moreover, no significant correlation was observed between the change in the MTE-MFC distance in the non-weight-bearing tunnel view and BMI, age, FTA, and PTS. CONCLUSIONS: The non-weight-bearing tunnel view is highly beneficial for evaluating MMPRT progression in the short term.