Finerenone in Patients With a Recent Worsening Heart Failure Event: The FINEARTS-HF Trial.

BACKGROUND: Patients with heart failure (HF) and a recent worsening heart failure (WHF) event are known to be at high risk of recurrent hospitalization and death, regardless of ejection fraction. OBJECTIVES: This study examined the efficacy and safety of the nonsteroidal mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist (MRA) finerenone in relation to the recency of a WHF event. METHODS: FINEARTS-HF (FINerenone trial to investigate Efficacy and sAfety superioR to placebo in paTientS with Heart Failure) was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of finerenone in patients with HF and left ventricular ejection fraction ≥40%. In this prespecified analysis, we assessed the risk of cardiovascular (CV) events and response to finerenone vs placebo in relation to the time from WHF to randomization (during or within 7 days, 7 days to 3 months, >3 months, or no prior WHF). The primary outcome was a composite of total (first and recurrent) WHF events and CV death, analyzed using a proportional rates method. RESULTS: Of 6,001 patients validly randomized to finerenone or placebo, 1,219 (20.3%) were enrolled during (749 [12.5%]) or within 7 days (470 [7.8%]), 2,028 (33.8%) between 7 days and 3 months, and 937 (15.6%) >3 months from a WHF event; 1,817 (30.3%) had no prior history of WHF. Rates of the primary composite outcome varied inversely with time since WHF, with >2-fold higher risk in those enrolled during or within 7 days of WHF compared with those enrolled >3 months from WHF or without prior WHF (risk ratio [RR]: 2.13; 95% CI: 1.82-2.55). Compared to placebo, finerenone appeared to lower the risk of the primary composite to a greater extent in those enrolled within 7 days of WHF (RR: 0.74; 95% CI: 0.57-0.95) or between 7 days and 3 months of WHF (RR: 0.79; 95% CI: 0.64-0.97) than in those >3 months from WHF or without prior WHF (RR: 0.99; 95% CI: 0.81-1.21); however, no definitive treatment-by-time interaction could be confirmed (P = 0.07). Greater absolute risk reductions with finerenone were accordingly seen in those with recent WHF (Ptrend = 0.011). The risk of adverse events including hyperkalemia and worsening renal function among patients assigned to finerenone was not increased in those with recent WHF. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with those without recent WHF, patients with HF and mildly reduced or preserved ejection fraction who have experienced a recent WHF event are at higher risk for recurrent HF events and CV death; a possible signal of enhanced absolute treatment benefit with finerenone in this population requires further confirmation in future studies. (Study to Evaluate the Efficacy [Effect on Disease] and Safety of Finerenone on Morbidity [Events Indicating Disease Worsening] & Mortality [Death Rate] in Participants With Heart Failure and Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction [Proportion of Blood Expelled Per Heart Stroke] Greater or Equal to 40% [FINEARTS-HF], NCT04435626; A study to gather information on the influence of study drug finerenone on the number of deaths and hospitalizations in participants with heart failure EudraCT 2020-000306-29).

Finerenone's Impact on Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events in Chronic Kidney Disease and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Systematic Review.

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) impacts about 10% of adults globally and substantially elevates the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), such as heart attacks, strokes, cardiovascular-related deaths, and hospital admissions due to heart failure. The interplay between CKD and cardiovascular disease (CVD) leads to poor health outcomes. Nevertheless, there is a scarcity of systematic reviews focusing on the effectiveness of finerenone, a new non-steroidal mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist (MRA), in lowering these risks. In this systematic review, we aim to evaluate the impact of finerenone on reducing MACE in individuals with CKD and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). CKD pathophysiology involves hyperglycemia, hypertension, and dyslipidemia, leading to glomerular hyperfiltration, inflammation, and fibrosis. Traditional treatments, including angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEi), angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs), and sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2i), often fall short in preventing cardiovascular events. Steroidal MRAs like spironolactone and eplerenone, while effective in reducing proteinuria, are limited by hyperkalemia risks. Finerenone offers a more selective mechanism, reducing sodium retention, inflammation, and fibrosis, with a lower risk of hyperkalemia. We searched five electronic databases comprehensively, identifying studies consistently demonstrating that finerenone significantly reduces MACE and improves renal outcomes by reducing albuminuria and slowing the fall in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). However, limitations include study heterogeneity, short follow-up periods, and potential publication bias. In conclusion, finerenone shows promise as a therapeutic option for CKD and T2DM, reducing MACE and improving renal outcomes. Further research is needed to understand its long-term benefits and safety across diverse populations.

Benefit of combination therapy with dapagliflozin and eplerenone on cardiac function and fibrosis in rats with non-diabetic chronic kidney disease.

Patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) are at a high risk of cardiovascular (CV) complications. In these patients, sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) have been shown to reduce CV events. Mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs) exert similar benefits in diabetic CKD, though their effects in non-diabetic CKD remain unclear. This study aimed to evaluated whether the combination of Dapagliflozin (DAPA) and Eplerenone (EPLE) would have positive effects on cardiorenal functions in a non-diabetic CKD model. CKD was induced in rats via 5/6 nephrectomy, followed by treatment with DAPA (5 mg/kg/day PO), EPLE (100 mg/kg/day PO) or the combination for 3 months following CKD induction. Cardiorenal functions were assessed after the treatment period. All treated groups showed reduced kidney fibrosis though plasma creatinine and urea levels remained unchanged. Compared to untreated CKD, EPLE or DAPA/EPLE reduced left ventricle (LV) end-diastolic pressure and LV end-diastolic pressure volume relationship, whereas DAPA alone did not achieve significant reductions. Compared to untreated CKD, EPLE and DAPA/EPLE improved cardiac perfusion but DAPA alone did not. Cardiac fibrosis in CKD was blunted by either DAPA or EPLE alone, with the combination showing an additive effect. In conclusion, co-treatment with DAPA and EPLE enhances diastolic function, cardiac perfusion and reduces myocardial fibrosis in non-diabetic CKD rats.

Evaluating the effects of adrenalectomy and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist on cardiac remodeling and diastolic function in patients with aldosterone-producing adenoma.

Cardiac remodeling and diastolic dysfunction in patients with aldosterone-producing adenomas (APA) can be improved after adrenalectomy. However, the effect of mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist (MRA) treatment remains unclear. The aim of this study is to evaluate the effect of MRA on cardiac remodeling and diastolic dysfunction in patients with PA. We prospectively enrolled patients with APA from 1993 to 2023, who either received medical treatment with MRAs or underwent adrenalectomy. Biochemical characteristics and echocardiographic findings were collected at baseline and one year after treatment. Propensity score matching was conducted based on baseline biochemical characteristics, left ventricular mass index (LVMI), and diastolic function. A total of 467 APA patients were enrolled in the study. After propensity score matching, 159 patients who underwent adrenalectomy were matched with 159 patients who received MRAs. After therapy, patients who received MRAs showed significant improvement in diastolic function after one year of treatment but not LVMI. Compared to the MRA group, the adrenalectomy group had greater improvement in systolic blood pressure, plasma aldosterone concentration, plasma renin activity, aldosterone-to-renin ratio, and LVMI. In multivariable regression analysis, pretreatment echocardiographic values were significantly associated with changes in both LVMI and E/e', while the treatment strategy showed a significant association with changes in LVMI. Thus, one year after therapy, both adrenalectomy and MRA are effective in improving diastolic function in patients with APA. However, adrenalectomy is more effective than MRA treatment in reversing cardiac remodeling in patients with APA.

Successful treatment of severe renal failure caused by malignant hypertension using a combination of renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitors: a case report.

Marked activation of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) plays an important role in malignant hypertension (MHT) by worsening hypertension and renal function. The rates of readmission for severe hypertension and cardiovascular disease in such emergencies are high, suggesting that suppression of the RAAS may be inadequate during the acute phase in some cases. This report presents a case of MHT complicated with renal insufficiency (creatinine 3.93 mg/dL) and massive proteinuria, in which antihypertensive therapy, including an angiotensin receptor blocker, aliskiren, and spironolactone, normalized blood pressure (BP) and preserved renal function. Plasma renin activity was extremely high (131.9 ng/mL/h) on admission but normalized within almost 2 weeks. Although aliskiren and spironolactone were discontinued before discharge, BP was well controlled and renal function was further improved (creatinine 1.14 mg/dL) at follow-up 24 months later. This case of renal failure induced by MHT was successfully treated with a combination of RAAS inhibitors during the acute phase. The controlled BP and improved renal function in this patient suggest that adequate suppression of the RAAS cascade during the acute phase is potentially effective in terms of breaking the vicious cycle of MHT with hyperreninemia.

Mineralocorticoid Antagonism in Heart Failure: Established and Emerging Therapeutic Role.

The pathophysiology of heart failure (HF) is related to the overactivation of the mineralocorticoid receptor, leading to fluid retention and adverse myocardial remodeling. Although mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs) are recommended for the treatment of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), they remain underused due to adverse effects such as hyperkalemia; and their efficacy is controversial in heart failure with mildly reduced ejection fraction (HFmrEF) and heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). Recent trials in people with diabetes and kidney disease have supported the use of nonsteroidal MRAs in reducing HF-related morbidity and mortality and have fewer side effects than their steroidal counterparts. The efficacy and safety of nonsteroidal MRAs have not been tested in HF and are currently being evaluated in additional clinical trials. This review comprehensively examines the current data regarding MRAs for HF and the future direction of nonsteroidal MRA research while exploring the causes of MRA underutilization.

Comparative effectiveness and safety of eplerenone and spironolactone in patients with heart failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Eplerenone and spironolactone, recognized as mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs), have been reported to improve clinical prognosis among individuals diagnosed with heart failure (HF). However, the difference in the clinical effects between eplerenone and spironolactone in individuals with HF remains uncertain. We aimed to assess the impact of eplerenone compared to spironolactone on clinical outcomes within the HF population. METHODS: An extensive search was executed in several databases (PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, Cochrane Library). All relevant studies evaluating eplerenone compared to spironolactone in patients with HF were included. Dichotomous data were pooled as Hazard ratio (HR) or Risk ratio (RR) with a 95% confidence interval (CI). Our main outcome was all-cause mortality. Secondary outcomes included death from cardiovascular causes, treatment withdrawal, and gynecomastia. RESULTS: Ten studies, comprising 21,930 HF individuals, were included in our investigation. Eplerenone showed a lower risk of all-cause mortality (HR = 0.78, 95%CI [0.64 to 0.94], P = 0.009) and cardiovascular mortality (HR = 0.54, 95%CI [0.39, 0.74], P = 0.0001) compared to spironolactone. Furthermore, eplerenone exhibited a reduced risk of treatment withdrawal (RR = 0.69, 95% CI [0.62, 0.78], P = 0.0001) and gynecomastia (RR = 0.07, 95% CI [0.02 to 0.31], P = 0.0001) than spironolactone. CONCLUSION: Eplerenone revealed lower all-cause and cardiovascular mortality events in comparison to spironolactone. Moreover, eplerenone was associated with lower gynecomastia and treatment withdrawal events compared to spironolactone. Further well-designed randomized controlled trials are still warranted better to identify the clinical differences between eplerenone and spironolactone. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Protocol registration: https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/VNMGK.

Patiromer-Facilitated Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone System Inhibitor Utilization in Patients with Heart Failure with or without Comorbid Chronic Kidney Disease: Subgroup Analysis of DIAMOND Randomized Trial.

INTRODUCTION: Renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitor (RAASi; including mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists [MRAs]) benefits are greatest in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and chronic kidney disease (CKD); however, the risk of hyperkalemia (HK) is high. METHODS: The DIAMOND trial (NCT03888066) assessed the ability of patiromer to control serum potassium (sK+) in patients with HFrEF with/without CKD. Prior to randomization (double-blind withdrawal, 1:1), patients on patiromer had to achieve ≥50% recommended doses of RAASi and 50 mg/day of MRA with normokalemia during a run-in period. The present analysis assessed the effect of baseline estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) in subgroups of ≥/<60, ≥/<45 (prespecified), and ≥/<30 mL/min/1.73 m2 (added post hoc). RESULTS: In total, 81.3, 78.9, and 81.1% of patients with eGFR <60, <45, and <30 mL/min/1.73 m2 at screening achieved RAASi/MRA targets. A greater efficacy of patiromer versus placebo to control sK+ in patients with more advanced CKD was reported (p-interaction ≤ 0.027 for all eGFR subgroups). Greater effects on secondary endpoints were observed with patiromer versus placebo in patients with eGFR <60 and <45 mL/min/1.73 m2. Adverse effects were similar between patiromer and placebo across subgroups. CONCLUSION: Patiromer enabled use of RAASi, controlled sK+, and minimized HK risk in patients with HFrEF, with greater effect sizes for most endpoints noted in patient subgroups with lower eGFR. Patiromer was well tolerated by patients in all eGFR subgroups.

Adverse events associated with early initiation of Eplerenone in patients hospitalized for acute heart failure.

BACKGROUND: The guidelines recommend the initiation or up-titration of heart failure (HF) treatments following an HF hospitalization; however, concerns about adverse events may limit the use of mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs). Patient profiles or disease severity might impact adverse events associated with MRA therapy in acute HF. METHODS: The EARLIER trial included patients with acute HF who were randomized to eplerenone or placebo over 6 months. Adverse events (i.e., worsening renal function [WRF], hyperkalemia, hypotension, and volume depletion/dehydration) were assessed. HF-related outcome included a composite of all-cause mortality, HF re-hospitalization, investigator-reported worsening HF and out-of-hospital diuretic intensification. RESULTS: In 297 patients (mean age: 67 ± 13 years; 73% males), adverse events were observed: 44.4% experienced WRF (>20% drop in estimated glomerular filtration rate[eGFR] and/or investigator-reported WRF), 8.4% had hyperkalemia (potassium >5.5 mmol/L and/or investigator-reported hyperkalemia), 27.9% experienced hypotension (systolic blood pressure[SBP] <90 mmHg and/or investigator-reported hypotension), and 16.8% had investigator-reported volume depletion/dehydration. Eplerenone vs. placebo did not elevate the incidence of these events (all-p-values>0.0 5). Multivariable analyses revealed that, irrespective of treatment allocation, older age (>7 5 years), prevalent diabetes, symptomatic congestion, and microalbuminuria were associated with increased risk of WRF. Baseline eGFR<60 ml/min/1.73m2 and SBP < 90 mmHg predicted hyperkalemia and hypotension, respectively, while older patients were more likely to experience volume depletion/dehydration. However, these patient profiles did not alter the benefit of eplerenone on outcomes (HR [9 5%CI] = 0.53 [0.29 to 0.97], P = 0.04; all-p-for-interaction>0.10). CONCLUSION: Eplerenone did not increase adverse events compared with placebo in acute HF. Importantly, disease severity and comorbidity burden greatly influence adverse events, but not benefit from eplerenone.

A four-in-one first-in-human study to assess safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and concentration-QTc relationship of HRS-1780, a selective non-steroidal mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist, in healthy men.

BACKGROUND: This first-in-human study evaluated HRS-1780, an oral selective non-steroidal mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist, in healthy men. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: In single ascending dose (SAD) part, 10 participants for each dose cohort (5, 10, 20, 40, 60, and 80 mg) were randomized (8:2) to HRS-1780 or placebo. In multiple ascending dose part, 12 participants for each dose (10, 20, and 40 mg) were randomized (9:3) to HRS-1780 or placebo once daily for 7 days. The primary endpoint was safety and tolerability. RESULTS: HRS-1780 was well tolerated with all adverse events being mild. In the steady state, the median time to maximum concentration (Tmax) was 0.750 h and mean half-life was 1.76-1.96 h. High-fat/high-calorie meal prolonged Tmax but did not affect exposure. Multiple dosing of HRS-1780 at 40 mg showed a decreasing trend in systolic blood pressure compared with placebo. Changes in plasma aldosterone and norepinephrine with HRS-1780 were higher compared to placebo. Upper bounds of two-sided 90% confidence interval of placebo-adjusted change-from-baseline QTcF were below 10 msec at the maximum concentration in SAD. The trial had limited sample size and short study duration. CONCLUSIONS: HRS-1780 had favorable safety and pharmacokinetic profiles and did not cause clinically meaningful QTcF prolongation. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05638126).

Finerenone and diabetic renal disease: a narrative review.

Overactivation of mineralocorticoid receptors occurs in cardiorenal diseases. Many patients with type 2 diabetes often progress to chronic kidney disease (CKD) and require dialysis. Finerenone is the first oral non-steroidal mineralocorticoid receptor (MR) antagonist used in patients with diabetic kidney disease and heart failure. Finerenone (also known as Kerendia) is more potent than spironolactone in reducing the progression of CKD and exerts its effect equally on the heart and kidneys, improving cardiovascular outcomes. Research demonstrates that finerenone improves proteinuria and glomerular filtration rate (GFR) if taken alone or in combination with sodium-glucose transporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i). Finerenone has been found to decrease mortality in patients with diabetic renal disease and improve quality of life. Its side effects, unlike those of spironolactone, do not include gynecomastia. However, it can result in hyperkalemia, which needs to be monitored. In this narrative review, we aim to investigate the mechanisms of action of finerenone and its implications in patients with type 2 diabetes.

Increased Spironolactone Dosing in Acute Heart Failure Alters Potassium Homeostasis but Does not Enhance Decongestion.

BACKGROUND: The ATHENA-HF (Aldosterone Targeted Neurohormonal Combined with Natriuresis Therapy in Heart Failure) clinical trial found no improvements in natriuretic peptide levels or clinical congestion when spironolactone 100 mg/day for 96 hours was used in addition to usual treatment for acute heart failure. METHODS: We performed a post hoc analysis of ATHENA-HF to determine whether spironolactone treatment induced any detectable pharmacodynamic effects and whether patients with potentially greater aldosterone activity experienced additional decongestion. Trial subjects previously treated with spironolactone were excluded. We first examined for changes in renal potassium handling. Using the baseline serum potassium level as a surrogate marker of spironolactone activity, we then divided each treatment arm into tertiles of baseline serum potassium and explored for differences in laboratory and clinical congestion outcomes. RESULTS: Among spironolactone-naïve patients, the change in serum potassium did not differ after 24 hours or 48 hours but was significantly greater with spironolactone treatment compared to placebo at 72 hours (0.23 ± 0.55 vs 0.03 ± 0.60 mEq/L; P = 0.042) and 96 hours (0.32 ± 0.51 vs 0.13 ± 0.72 mEq/L; P = 0.046). Potassium supplementation was similar at treatment start and at 24 hours, but spironolactone-treated patients required substantially less potassium replacement at 48 hours (24% vs 36%; P = 0.048), 72 hours (21% vs 37%; P = 0.013), and 96 hours (11% vs 38%; P < 0.001). When the treatment arms were divided into tertiles of baseline serum potassium, there were no differences in the 96-hour log N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide levels, net fluid loss, urine output, or dyspnea relief in any of the potassium groups, with no effect modification by treatment exposure. CONCLUSIONS: Spironolactone 100 mg/day for 96 hours in patients receiving intravenous loop diuresis for acute heart failure has no clear added decongestive ability but does meaningfully limit potassium wasting.

Design and baseline characteristics of the Finerenone, in addition to standard of care, on the progression of kidney disease in patients with Non-Diabetic Chronic Kidney Disease (FIND-CKD) randomized trial.

BACKGROUND AND HYPOTHESIS: Finerenone, a non-steroidal mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist, improved kidney, and cardiovascular outcomes in patients with CKD and T2D in two Phase 3 outcome trials. The FIND-CKD study investigates the effect of finerenone in adults with CKD without diabetes. METHODS: FIND-CKD (NCT05047263 and EU CT 2023-506897-11-00) is a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled Phase 3 trial in patients with CKD of non-diabetic aetiology. Adults with a urinary albumin-creatinine ratio (UACR) of ≥ 200 to ≤3500 mg/g and eGFR ≥ 25 to <90 mL/min/1.73 m2 receiving a maximum tolerated dose of a renin-angiotensin-system (RAS) inhibitor were randomized 1:1 to once daily placebo or finerenone 10 or 20 mg depending on eGFR above or below 60 mL/min/1.73 m2. The primary efficacy outcome is total eGFR slope, defined as the mean annual rate of change in eGFR from baseline to Month 32. Secondary efficacy outcomes include a combined cardiorenal composite outcome comprising time to kidney failure, sustained ≥57% decrease in eGFR, hospitalization for heart failure, or cardiovascular death, as well as separate kidney and cardiovascular composite outcomes. Adverse events are recorded to assess tolerability and safety. RESULTS: Across 24 countries, 3231 patients were screened and 1584 were randomized to study treatment. The most common causes of CKD were chronic glomerulonephritis (57.0%) and hypertensive/ischaemic nephropathy (29.0%). Immunoglobulin A nephropathy was the most common glomerulonephritis (26.3% of the total population). At baseline, mean eGFR and median UACR were 46.7 mL/min/1.73 m2 and 818.9 mg/g, respectively. Diuretics were used by 282 participants (17.8%), statins by 851 (53.7%), and calcium channel blockers by 794 (50.1%). SGLT2 inhibitors were used in 16.9% of patients; these individuals had a similar mean eGFR (45.6 vs 46.8 mL/min/1.73 m2) and slightly higher median UACR (871.9 vs 808.3 mg/g) compared to those not using SGLT2 inhibitors at baseline. CONCLUSIONS: FIND-CKD is the first Phase 3 trial of finerenone in patients with CKD of non-diabetic aetiology.

Novel Initiative Increasing GDMT Use Among Patients With Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction.

Guideline-directed medical therapy utilization in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) remains low despite benefits in morbidity and mortality. The authors describe a unique quality improvement initiative designed to increase angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor (ARNI) and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist (MRA) utilization in outpatients with HFrEF in a large cardiology practice, whereby eligible patients were identified in a standardized review process and medication utilization rates were linked to group quality metrics. Eligible HFrEF patients were defined as having a left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤40% and NYHA functional class II to IV level of symptoms. Those with an LVEF >40%, no documented LVEF, or with NYHA functional class I symptoms were excluded. ARNI utilization was defined as any dose of sacubitril/valsartan prescribed, and MRA utilization was defined as any dose of either spironolactone or eplerenone prescribed. Group quality metric targets were set at >25% ARNI prescription and >60% MRA prescription in eligible patients. Following project implementation, ARNI utilization rose from 31% to 67% and MRA increased from 28% to 66%. Establishing clear quality metrics and formulating a proactive evaluation process was associated with a significant increase in prescription rates.

Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonists in Patients With Heart Failure and Impaired Renal Function.

BACKGROUND: Kidney dysfunction often leads to reluctance to start or continue life-saving heart failure (HF) therapy. OBJECTIVES: This study sought to examine the efficacy and safety of mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs) in patients with HF with reduced ejection fraction experiencing significant kidney dysfunction. METHODS: We pooled individual patient data from the RALES (Randomized Aldactone Evaluation Study) and EMPHASIS-HF (Eplerenone in Mild Patients Hospitalization and Survival Study in Heart Failure) trials. The association between MRA treatment and outcomes was assessed according to whether the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) declined to <30 mL/min/1.73 m2 or not. The primary outcome was cardiovascular death or HF hospitalization. RESULTS: Among 4,355 patients included, 295 (6.8%) experienced a deterioration of eGFR after randomization to <30 mL/min/1.73 m2. These patients had more impaired baseline cardiac and kidney function (eGFR 47.3 ± 13.4 mL/min/1.73 m2 vs 70.5 ± 21.8 mL/min/1.73 m2) and had a higher risk of the primary outcome than patients without eGFR deterioration (HR: 2.49; 95% CI: 2.01-3.08; P < 0.001). However, the risk reduction in the primary outcome with MRA therapy was similar in those who experienced a decrease in eGFR to <30 mL/min/1.73 m2 (HR: 0.65; 95% CI: 0.43-0.99) compared with those who did not (HR: 0.63; 95% CI: 0.56-0.71) (Pinteraction = 0.87). In patients with a decrease in eGFR to <30 mL/min/1.73 m2, 21 fewer individuals (per 100 person-years) experienced the primary outcome with MRA treatment, vs placebo, compared with an excess of 3 more patients with severe hyperkalemia (>6.0 mmol/L). CONCLUSIONS: Because patients experiencing a decrease in eGFR to <30 mL/min/1.73 m2 are at very high risk, the absolute risk reduction with an MRA in these patients is large and this decline in eGFR should not automatically lead to treatment discontinuation.

Insights into drug development with quantitative systems pharmacology: A prospective case study of uncovering hyperkalemia risk in diabetic nephropathy with virtual clinical trials.

The quantitative systems pharmacology (QSP) approach is widely applied to address various essential questions in drug discovery and development, such as identification of the mechanism of action of a therapeutic agent, patient stratification, and the mechanistic understanding of the progression of disease. In this review article, we show the current landscape of the application of QSP modeling using a survey of QSP publications over 10 years from 2013 to 2022. We also present a use case for the risk assessment of hyperkalemia in patients with diabetic nephropathy treated with mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs, renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitors), as a prospective simulation of late clinical development. A QSP model for generating virtual patients with diabetic nephropathy was used to quantitatively assess that the nonsteroidal MRAs, finerenone and apararenone, have a lower risk of hyperkalemia than the steroidal MRA, eplerenone. Prospective simulation studies using a QSP model are useful to prioritize pharmaceutical candidates in clinical development and validate mechanism-based pharmacological concepts related to the risk-benefit, before conducting large-scale clinical trials.