Autoimmune and paraneoplastic neurological disorders: A review of relevant neuroimaging findings.

INTRODUCTION: Paraneoplastic neurologic syndromes (PNS) and autoimmune encephalitis (AIE) are immune-mediated disorders. PNS is linked to cancer, while AIE may not Their clinical manifestations and imaging patterns need further elucidation. OBJECTIVE/AIMS: To investigate the clinical profiles, antibody associations, neuroimaging patterns, treatments, and outcomes of PNS and AIE. METHODS: A systematic review of 379 articles published between 2014 and 2023 was conducted. Of the 55 studies screened, 333 patients were diagnosed with either PNS or AIE and tested positive for novel antibodies. Data on demographics, symptoms, imaging, antibodies, cancer associations, treatment, and outcomes were extracted. RESULTS: The study included 333 patients (mean age 54 years, 67% males) with PNS and AIE positive for various novel antibodies. 84% had central nervous system issues like cognitive impairment (53%), rhombencephalitis (17%), and cerebellar disorders (24%). Neuroimaging revealed distinct patterns with high-risk antibodies associated with brainstem lesions in 98%, cerebellar in 91%, hippocampal in 98%, basal ganglia in 75%, and spinal cord in 91%, while low/intermediate-risk antibodies were associated with medial temporal lobe lesions in 71% and other cortical/subcortical lesions in 55%. High-risk antibodies were associated with younger males, deep brain lesions, and increased mortality of 61%, while low/intermediate-risk antibodies were associated with females, cortical/subcortical lesions, and better outcomes with 39% mortality. Associated cancers included seminomas (23%), lung (19%), ovarian (2%), and breast (2%). Treatments included IVIG, chemotherapy, and plasmapheresis. Overall mortality was 25% in this cohort. CONCLUSION: PNS and AIE have distinct clinical and radiological patterns based on antibody profiles. High-risk antibodies are associated with increased mortality while low/intermediate-risk antibodies are associated with improved outcomes. Appropriate imaging and antibody testing are critical for accurate diagnosis.

Immunochemical Characterization of Setaria cervi Microfilarial Antigens Using Novel Antibodies.

BACKGROUND: Filariasis affects millions of people in tropical and subtropical regions of the world and is caused by nematode roundworm. In order to develop a vaccine and specific diagnostic tests, it is important to characterize different stages of the filarial worms. Microfilariae (Mf) stage of the roundworm is found in host's blood or lymph vessels and can be important not only for developing better immunodiagnostics but also for understanding immune recognition and its relevance to immunepathogenesis and protective immunity. OBJECTIVE: The present study aimed to immunocharacterize Mf and adult worm antigens that could be helpful in future diagnostic tests. METHODS: Four different immune sera against Setaria cervi intact live, intact live with adjuvant, intact glutaraldehyde fixed with adjuvant and total somatic Mf were prepared and used for the immunocharacterization of Mf antigens. RESULTS: Our study results suggest that compared to fixed intact Mf, live intact Mf are more immunogenic, as the immune sera generated against intact live Mf showed high ELISA reactivity with Setaria cervi Mf and adult worm antigens. All the four immune sera IgG fractions had surface specificity as determined through considerable ELISA reactivity with S. cervi intact Mf. When tested under native conditions (immunoelectrophoresis and crossed immunoelectrophoresis), all the four immune rabbit sera were able to detect antigens of S. cervi Mf and adult stages. CONCLUSION: These results can be useful in detailed understanding of the complex nature of the Mf and adult antigens, which are prerequisites in the development of vaccine and more specific diagnostic tests.

Second- and third-generation drugs for immuno-oncology treatment-The more the better?

Recent success in cancer immunotherapy (anti-CTLA-4, anti-PD1/PD-L1) has confirmed the hypothesis that the immune system can control many cancers across various histologies, in some cases producing durable responses in a way not seen with many small-molecule drugs. However, only less than 25% of all patients do respond to immuno-oncology drugs and several resistance mechanisms have been identified (e.g. T-cell exhaustion, overexpression of caspase-8 and ß-catenin, PD-1/PD-L1 gene amplification, MHC-I/II mutations). To improve response rates and to overcome resistance, novel second- and third-generation immuno-oncology drugs are currently evaluated in ongoing phase I/II trials (either alone or in combination) including novel inhibitory compounds (e.g. TIM-3, VISTA, LAG-3, IDO, KIR) and newly developed co-stimulatory antibodies (e.g. CD40, GITR, OX40, CD137, ICOS). It is important to note that co-stimulatory agents strikingly differ in their proposed mechanism of action compared with monoclonal antibodies that accomplish immune activation by blocking negative checkpoint molecules such as CTLA-4 or PD-1/PD-1 or others. Indeed, the prospect of combining agonistic with antagonistic agents is enticing and represents a real immunologic opportunity to 'step on the gas' while 'cutting the brakes', although this strategy as a novel cancer therapy has not been universally endorsed so far. Concerns include the prospect of triggering cytokine-release syndromes, autoimmune reactions and hyper immune stimulation leading to activation-induced cell death or tolerance, however, toxicity has not been a major issue in the clinical trials reported so far. Although initial phase I/II clinical trials of agonistic and novel antagonistic drugs have shown highly promising results in the absence of disabling toxicity, both in single-agent studies and in combination with chemotherapy or other immune system targeting drugs; however, numerous questions remain about dose, schedule, route of administration and formulation as well as identifying the appropriate patient populations. In our view, with such a wealth of potential mechanisms of action and with the ability to fine-tune monoclonal antibody structure and function to suit particular requirements, the second and third wave of immuno-oncology drugs are likely to provide rapid advances with new combinations of novel immunotherapy (especially co-stimulatory antibodies). Here, we will review the mechanisms of action and the clinical data of these new antibodies and discuss the major issues facing this rapidly evolving field.