Hospital Palliative Care Team Involvement in Inpatients with Hematologic Malignancies: A Retrospective Study.

Background: Data on the involvement of hospital palliative care teams (HPCT) in the management of patients with hematologic malignancies (HM) are limited. Objectives: To describe characteristics, symptom burden according to the German Hospice and Palliative Care Evaluation assessment tool, and course of inpatients with HM who were referred to a HPCT, and compare them with their counterparts with solid tumors (ST). Design: Retrospective analysis. Setting/Subjects: Inpatients with HM and ST who were referred to the HPCT of a comprehensive cancer center in Germany between January 1, 2015, and December 31, 2019. Results: The analysis included 2885 patients; 412 (14.3%) had HM and 2473 (85.7%) had ST. Patients with HM more often experienced depression (p = 0.003), tension (p < 0.001), and disorientation (p = 0.003); pain (p = 0.029), nausea (p = 0.003), weakness (p < 0.001), loss of appetite (p = 0.005), tiredness (p < 0.001), and need for assistance with activities of daily living (p < 0.001) were more common in patients with ST. Patients with HM were more often admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) (p < 0.001), had longer ICU stays (p = 0.005), and had a higher death rate (p < 0.001) during their last stay in the hospital. The time between the first contact with the HPCT and death was shorter for patients with HM (p < 0.001). Patients with HM also had a shorter overall time of care by the HPCT (p < 0.001). Conclusions: As compared with their counterparts with ST, inpatients with HM were closer to death at referral to the HPCT, experienced a comparable overall symptom burden, and were admitted to the ICU more frequently after HPCT involvement.

Association between hospital palliative care team intervention volume and patient outcomes.

BACKGROUND: The benefits of palliative care in patients with advanced cancer are well established. However, the effect of the skills of the palliative care team (PCT) on patient outcomes remains unclear. Our aim was to evaluate the association between hospital PCT intervention volume and patient outcomes in patients with cancer. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted using a nationwide inpatient database in Japan. Patients with cancer receiving chemotherapy and PCT intervention from 2015 to 2020 were included. The outcomes were incidence of hyperactive delirium within 30 days of admission, mortality within 30 days of admission, and decline in activities of daily living (ADL) at discharge. The exposure of interest was hospital PCT intervention volume (annual number of new PCT interventions in a hospital), which was categorized into low-, intermediate-, and high-volume groups according to tertiles. Multivariate logistic regression and restricted cubic-spline regression were conducted. RESULTS: Of 29,076 patients, 1495 (5.1%), 562 (1.9%), and 3026 (10.4%) developed delirium, mortality, and decline in ADL, respectively. Compared with the low hospital PCT intervention volume group (1-103 cases/year, n = 9712), the intermediate (104-195, n = 9664) and high (196-679, n = 9700) volume groups showed significant association with lower odds ratios of 30-day delirium (odds ratio, 0.79 [95% confidence interval, 0.69-0.91] and 0.80 [0.69-0.93], respectively), 30-day mortality (0.73 [0.60-0.90] and 0.59 [0.46-0.75], respectively), and decline in ADL (0.77 [0.70-0.84] and 0.52 [0.47-0.58], respectively). CONCLUSION: Hospital PCT intervention volume is inversely associated with the odds ratios of delirium, mortality, and decline in ADL among hospitalized patients with cancer.

Sedation in pediatric palliative care: The role of pediatric palliative care teams.

OBJECTIVES: Palliative sedation (PS) consists of the use of drugs to alleviate the suffering of patients with refractory symptoms, through a reduction in consciousness. The aim of this study is to describe the incidence of and indications for PS in patients treated by pediatric palliative care teams (PPCT), and the relationship between PS, the place of death, and the characteristics of the care teams. METHODS: Ambispective study with the participation of 14 PPCT working in Spain. RESULTS: From January to December 2019, a total of 164 patients attended by these PPCT died. Of these, 83 (50.6%) received PS during their last 24 hours. The most frequent refractory symptoms were terminal suffering (n = 40, 48.2%), dyspnea (n = 9, 10.8%), pain (n = 8, 9.6%), and convulsive state (n = 7, 8.4%). Sedation in the last 24 hours of life was more likely if the patient died in hospital, rather than at home (62.9% vs. 33.3%, p < 0.01); if the parents had not expressed their preference regarding the place of death (69.2% vs. 45.2%, p = 0.009); and if the PPCT had less than 5 years' experience (66.7% vs. 45.5%, p = 0.018). SIGNIFICANCE OF RESULTS: PS is a real possibility in pediatric end-of-life care and relates to care planning and team expertise.

The effect of palliative care team intervention and symptom improvement using patient-reported outcomes: a multicenter prospective observational study.

PURPOSE: Hospital-based palliative care teams (HPCTs) are widespread internationally, but multicenter studies about their effectiveness, using patient-reported outcomes (PROs), are limited to Australia and a few other countries. We conducted a multicenter, prospective observational study in Japan to explore the effectiveness of the HPCTs using PROs. METHODS: Nationwide, eight hospitals participated in the study. We included newly referred patients for one month in 2021 and followed them for one month. We asked the patients to complete the Integrated Palliative Care Outcome Scale or the Edmonton Symptom Assessment System as PROs at the time of the intervention, three days later, and weekly after the intervention. RESULTS: A total of 318 participants were enrolled, of whom 86% were patients with cancer, 56% were undergoing cancer treatment, and 20% received the Best Supportive Care. After one week, the following 12 symptoms showed more than a 60% improvement from severe to moderate or less: vomiting (100%), shortness of breath (86%), nausea (83%), practical problems (80%), drowsiness (76%), pain (72%), poor sharing of feelings with family or friends (72%), weakness (71%), constipation (69%), not feeling at peace (64%), lack of information (63%), and sore or dry mouth (61%). Symptoms with improvement from severe/moderate to mild or less were vomiting (71%) and practical problems (68%). CONCLUSION: This multicenter study showed that HPCTs effectively improved symptoms in several severe conditions, as assessed by PROs. This study also demonstrated the difficulty of relieving symptoms in patients in palliative care and the need for improved care.

Outcomes of an Acute Palliative Care Unit at a Comprehensive Cancer Center in Korea.

Background: The acute palliative care unit (APCU) bridges between active cancer treatment and hospice care. However, no study has proven the efficacy of APCU in Korea. Objective: To evaluate the first-year outcomes of the patients admitted to an APCU at a tertiary hospital in Korea. Design: The APCU admitted 205 patients between April 14, 2014, and April 30, 2015. Of these patients, 57 were evaluable for baseline and one-week follow-up Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS). Results: Of the 57 participants, 56.1% were male, with a median age of 60 years (range, 52.8-69.5 years). All patients had advanced cancer, and 42 out of 57 had terminal illnesses. The median APCU stay was 14 days (range, 10-17 days). The 42 (73.7%) patients were referred to the APCU after anticancer treatment was completed. Ten (17.5%) patients died during their stay, and 20 (35.1%) were discharged home. Among those who completed the ESAS, there were significant improvements in scores in the following symptoms: fatigue, depression, loss of appetite, and shortness of breath. Physical symptoms (pain, fatigue, nausea, drowsiness, appetite, and shortness of breath) and the total ESAS scores were significantly improved (p = 0.002 and p = 0.005, respectively). Each non-medical palliative care program, such as art and music therapy, yoga, foot massage, haircut, and body care, showed no significant differences between the group who received them and those who did not. Conclusion: During the APCU stay, the overall symptoms of inpatients were reduced. A comprehensive and multidisciplinary team approach is essential for patients who need palliative care.

Cachexia staging score predicts survival in patients with cancer who receive palliative care.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to validate the cachexia staging score (CSS), a multidimensional, item-based diagnostic method of cachexia severity, for patients with advanced cancer receiving palliative care. METHODS: Eligible patients were those with cancer who received palliative care during hospitalization between May 2019 and April 2020. All data were collected retrospectively from medical records. Cachexia was graded into four levels according to the CSS. Kaplan-Meier curves were constructed with or without death as the outcome, comparing prognoses among different levels of cachexia with Bonferroni correction. Cox proportional hazards regression analysis was performed to identify factors affecting mortality. RESULTS: The mean age of the 196 patients was 65.8 ± 14 y. Men made up 42% of the study population. Lower body mass index, increased rate of weight loss, increased strength, assistance walking, rising from a chair, climbing stairs, and falls (SARC-F) points, decline in activities of daily living, appetite loss, and abnormal blood biomarkers were significantly more common with increasing severity of cachexia, and survival was shorter (P < 0.001). The hazard ratio (HR) increased with worsening severity of cachexia according to CSS classification (precachexia: HR, 2.78; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.62-12.46, P = 0.182; cachexia: HR, 4.77; 95% CI, 1.09-20.80; P = 0.038; and refractory cachexia: HR, 11.00; 95% CI, 2.37-51.07; P = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: The CSS predicted life expectancy in a population of patients receiving palliative care and had excellent prognostic discriminative power to classify patients at different stages of cachexia.

Impact of interprofessional collaborative practice in palliative care on outcomes for advanced cancer inpatients in a resource-limited setting.

BACKGROUND: Palliative care for patients with advanced cancer improves suffering symptoms, and quality of life (QoL). However, routine implementation of palliative care by specialty palliative care consultation is still an unmet need among in-patients with advanced cancer. Our study aim is to evaluate the effectiveness of a team-based approach on QoLs and readmission rate when compared to routine practice by among medical oncologists. METHODS: This study was a prospective, Quasi-Experimental design. In-patients with advanced cancer were non-randomly assigned to receive palliative care service by team-based approach or medical oncologists only. The primary endpoint was QoL. The secondary endpoint was the readmission rate at 7 and 30 days of hospital discharge. RESULTS: One hundred twenty-two in-patients were enrolled. In-patients who were assessed by a team-based approach had significantly improved change scores of subjective well-being (SWB) when compared to another group (∆ SWB: -1 [-19 - 11] vs 0 [-9 - 15], p-value = 0.043). Furthermore, patients who were assessed under a team-based approach had significantly decreased in terms of readmission rate at 7 days of hospital discharge (4.92% in the team-based approach group vs. 19.67% in the medical oncologist group, p-value = 0.013). CONCLUSIONS: Interdisciplinary collaboration is the key to success in establishing goals of care, which are supporting the best possible QoL and relieving suffering symptoms for those in-patients with advanced cancer. Furthermore, the readmission rate at 7 days of hospital discharge was significantly reduced by a team-based approach. Therefore, comprehensive palliative care assessment by interprofessional collaborative practice is required. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Thai Clinical Trials Registry (TCTR): number 20200312001. Date of first registration on 09/03/2020.

A Retrospective Review of the Characteristics and Outcomes of Patients through an Integrated Palliative Care Model during the First Wave of the SARS-COV-2 Pandemic.

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic created surges of rapidly deteriorating patients straining health care necessitating the evaluation of novel models of palliative care (PC) integration to reduce patient suffering and hospital strain. Objective: To evaluate an integrated PC model's effect on code status change. Design: This is an observational retrospective study. Setting: Urban quaternary referral center in the southeastern United States from April 6th to August 20th, 2020. Patients: All patients admitted to our medical intensive care unit and stepdown unit were diagnosed with COVID-19. Measurements: Code status change, multivariate regression on patient characteristics. Results: In total, 79.7% (98/123) patients were full code at admission. After PC consultation, 33.3% (41/123) patients remained full code, 13.0% (16/123) were do not resuscitate (DNR), and 53.6% (66/123) changed to DNR/do not intubate (DNI). An ordinal logistic model determined that consultation location (odds ratio [OR] 3.35, p = 0.017) and patient age (OR 1.09, p < 0.001) were predictive of code status change to DNR/DNI. Conclusion: Within an integrated PC model, PC consultation was associated with code status change. The effect of an integrated PC model warrants further study in comparison with a traditional PC model in a similar patient cohort.

[Specialized outpatient palliative care (SAPV) : Basics, indications and prescription in clinical practice]. / Spezialisierte ambulante Palliativversorgung (SAPV) : Grundlagen, Indikation und Verordnung in der klinischen Praxis.

Specialized outpatient palliative care (SAPV) was introduced by the legislature in 2007 in § 37b of the German Social Code Book V (SGBV) as a form of care for people with a life-limiting illness and an increased complexity of care. It is therefore only required by some of the palliative patients. It is intended to avoid unnecessary hospital admissions and to enable those affected to remain in their home environment in a dignified manner despite a complex illness and to be accompanied there until death. Initially introduced as a form of care for adults, the need for expansion to children and adolescents with life-limiting illnesses soon became apparent, so that care was supplemented in 2011 with specialized pediatric palliative care (SAPPV). Both SAPV and SAPPV involve the use of a specialized and multiprofessional palliative care team (PCT), which is characterized by 24­h accessibility and special qualifications, thus providing comprehensive support. This is provided in addition to general outpatient palliative care (AAPV) and aims to maintain, promote and, if possible, improve the quality of life and self-determination at the end of life as much as possible. The SAPV is a health insurance benefit and requires a prescription via form 63 by a physician.

Caring for Patients in Need of Palliative Care: Is This a Mission for Acute Care Hospitals? Key Questions for Healthcare Professionals.

The prevalence of patients affected by end-stage diseases or advanced cancer is increasing due to an aging population and progression in medicine and public healthcare. The burden of symptoms these people suffer in the last months of life often forces them to seek aid in an emergency department. In developed countries, acute care hospital-based services are often better designed to treat acute clinical conditions than to manage the needs of patients with serious chronic diseases. Thus, the palliative care (PC) population poses very real clinical challenges to healthcare professionals who care for them in hospital settings. The authors have formulated four key questions (who, why, when, and how) to address in order to identify a model for providing the best care for these PC patients. The questions are related to: (1) defining people living with serious chronic diseases; (2) managing the challenge of unplanned hospital admission of these people; (3) identifying PC patients among people with serious chronic diseases; and (4) determining the appropriate work of caring for this inpatient PC population. Clinicians need the knowledge, tools, and services to care for these PC patients, and acute care hospitals should plan the work of caring for these inpatients.

Palliative surgery and the surgeon's role in the palliative care team: a review.

This review focuses on the role of palliative surgery in the care of the palliative care patient, and the appropriate role of the surgeon. The surgeon has much to bring to the palliative care team. The surgeon's role goes beyond the technical requirements of the palliative procedure, which itself must be strictly defined, and has recognized utility for improving quality of life in selected patients. These benefits may be substantial, but come at significant risk; requiring careful balancing of risks and benefits that is most completely understood by the surgeon. The surgeon's judgement can help determine which procedure best meets a patient's goals. The complex dialogue involved in the decision to undergo a palliative operation requires excellent communication between the palliative care team, the patient, and their family. Integrating the surgeon into the palliative care team could help with earlier initiation of those palliative discussions, and assist deliberation of palliative surgery. Surgeons also understand the importance of communication around palliative surgical interventions and have adapted several teaching models to the specifics of this crucial communication. A palliative team combining both surgeons and palliative care physicians may promote goal-concordant decision-making and remove barriers to communication and team engagement. The future of palliative surgery research will involve measures of success that go beyond physiology or mortality, to include more evaluations of communication and patient goals.

Percepciones de un equipo de cuidados paliativos pediátricos acerca del clown de hospital / Pediatric palliative care team perceptions' about hospital clowns / Percepções de uma equipe de cuidados paliativos pediátricos sobre o clown de hospital

Resumen La presente es una síntesis de resultados de una investigación mayor, cuyo objetivo principal fue conocer las perspectivas de familias y equipo de salud respecto de la presencia de clowns de hospital trabajando en cuidados paliativos pediátricos en una unidad en Chile. Guiado por un paradigma interpretativo, estrictos criterios de calidad y éticos, la metodología utilizada fue de tipo cualitativo, aplicando las técnicas de recolección de datos de entrevistas en profundidad, análisis de documentos y grupos de discusión. La sección de datos sobre el equipo aquí presentados, se analizó a través de las técnicas análisis de contenido y análisis crítico del discurso. Los resultados indican que la figura del clown es percibida como un mediador y valorada como terapia complementaria, especialmente por las competencias socioemocionales de esos profesionales y el juego que se utiliza como herramienta de intervención. Las conclusiones señalan que las competencias socioemocionales que promueve el clown de hospital son fundamentales para el trabajo en cuidados paliativos.

Abstract This is a synthesis of results of a major research which main objective was to know the perspectives of families and the health team regarding the presence of hospital clowns working in pediatric palliative care in a unit in Chile. Guided by an interpretivist paradigm, strict quality and ethical criteria, the methodology used was qualitative, applying in-depth interviews, document analysis and discussion groups as data collection techniques. The data section presented here about the health team was analyzed through content analysis and critical discourse analysis techniques. The results indicate that the figure of the clown is perceived as a mediator, valued as complementary therapy, especially due to the socio-emotional competences of these professionals and play used as an intervention tool. The conclusions indicate that the socio-emotional competences promoted by the hospital clown are fundamental to work in palliative care.

Resumo A presente é uma síntese de resultados de uma investigação maior, cujo objetivo principal foi conhecer as perspectivas de famílias e equipe de saúde a respeito da presença de clowns de hospital trabalhando em cuidados paliativos pediátricos em uma unidade no Chile. Guiado por um paradigma interpretativo, critérios estritos de qualidade e éticos, a metodologia utilizada foi de tipo qualitativo, aplicando as técnicas de coleta de dados de entrevistas em profundidade, análise de documentos e grupos de discussão. Os dados sobre a equipe aqui apresentados, foram analisados através das técnicas de análise de conteúdo e análise crítica do discurso. Os resultados indicam que a figura do clown é percebida como um mediador e valorizada como terapia complementar, especialmente pelas capacidades sócio-emocionais desses profissionais e o jogo que se utiliza como ferramenta de intervenção. As conclusões apontam que as capacidades sócio-emocionais que promovem o clown de hospital são fundamentais para o trabalho em cuidados paliativos.

Development of the Dutch Structure for Integrated Children's Palliative Care.

Children's palliative care (CPC) is gaining attention worldwide, facilitated by the exchange of knowledge during regular specialised congresses. This article describes the developments in the Netherlands over the past 15 years. The Foundation for Children's Palliative Expertise (PAL) was established as a nationwide initiative committed to improving palliative care for children countrywide. This led to the development of the first hospital-based CPC team in 2012, which expanded to a total of seven teams adjacent to children's university hospitals. Regional networks for CPC were developed in parallel to these teams from 2014 onwards. The networks are a collaboration of professionals from different disciplines and organisations, from hospital to homecare, and have covered the aspects of CPC nationally from 2019 onwards. They are connected through the Dutch Knowledge Centre for CPC. This centre was established in 2018 by the PAL Foundation in collaboration with the Dutch Association for Pediatrics. In 2013, the first evidence-based guideline, 'palliative care for children', provided access to knowledge for parents and healthcare providers, and in 2017, a format for an individual palliative care plan was established. Within the Knowledge Centre for CPC, a physician's support centre for dilemma's regarding the end of life of children was set up. The efforts to have children's palliative care embedded in the regular Dutch health care insurance are ongoing.

Specialist palliative and end-of-life care for patients with cancer and SARS-CoV-2 infection: a European perspective.

BACKGROUND: Specialist palliative care team (SPCT) involvement has been shown to improve symptom control and end-of-life care for patients with cancer, but little is known as to how these have been impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic. Here, we report SPCT involvement during the first wave of the pandemic and compare outcomes for patients with cancer who received and did not receive SPCT input from multiple European cancer centres. METHODS: From the OnCovid repository (N = 1318), we analysed cancer patients aged ⩾18 diagnosed with COVID-19 between 26 February and 22 June 2020 who had complete specialist palliative care team data (SPCT+ referred; SPCT- not referred). RESULTS: Of 555 eligible patients, 317 were male (57.1%), with a median age of 70 years (IQR 20). At COVID-19 diagnosis, 44.7% were on anti-cancer therapy and 53.3% had ⩾1 co-morbidity. Two hundred and six patients received SPCT input for symptom control (80.1%), psychological support (54.4%) and/or advance care planning (51%). SPCT+ patients had more 'Do not attempt cardio-pulmonary resuscitation' orders completed prior to (12.6% versus 3.7%) and during admission (50% versus 22.1%, p < 0.001), with more SPCT+ patients deemed suitable for treatment escalation (50% versus 22.1%, p < 0.001). SPCT involvement was associated with higher discharge rates from hospital for end-of-life care (9.7% versus 0%, p < 0.001). End-of-life anticipatory prescribing was higher in SPCT+ patients, with opioids (96.3% versus 47.1%) and benzodiazepines (82.9% versus 41.2%) being used frequently for symptom control. CONCLUSION: SPCT referral facilitated symptom control, emergency care and discharge planning, as well as high rates of referral for psychological support than previously reported. Our study highlighted the critical need of SPCTs for patients with cancer during the pandemic and should inform service planning for this population.

Chemotherapy use in end-of-life digestive cancer patients: a retrospective AGEO observational study.

BACKGROUND: The use of chemotherapy (CT) near the end-of-life (EOL) is an important issue in oncology since it could degrade quality of life. CT near EOL is still poorly studied, with no dedicated study in gastrointestinal (GI) cancer patients. AIM: To analyze in GI cancer patients the factors associated with the use of CT within 3- and 1-month before patients' death. METHODS AND PARTICIPANTS: All consecutive patients who died from a GI cancer in 10 French tertiary care hospitals during 2014 were included in this retrospective study. Clinical, demographical and biological data were collected and compared between patients receiving or not CT within 3- and 1-month before death. Variables associated with overall survival (OS) was also determined using of univariate and multivariate analyses with a Cox model. RESULTS: Four hundred and thirty-seven patients with a metastatic GI cancer were included in this study. Among them, 293 pts (67.0%) received CT within 3-months before death, and 121 pts (27.7%) received CT within 1-month before death. Patients receiving CT within 3-months before death were significantly younger (median age: 65.5 vs 72.8 years, p < 0.0001), with a better PS (PS 0 or 1: 53.9 vs 29.3%, p < 0.0001) and a higher albumin level (median: 32.8 vs 31.0 g/L, p = 0.048). Similar results were found for CT within 1 month before death. Palliative care team intervention was less frequent in patients who received CT in their last month of life (39.7% vs 51.3%, p = 0.02). In multivariate analysis, median OS from diagnosis was shorter in the group receiving CT within 1-month before death (HR = 0.59; 95% CI [0.48-0.74]). CONCLUSION: In GI-cancer patients, CT is administered within 3- and 1-month before death, in two and one third of patients, respectively. Patients receiving CT within 1-month before death, had more aggressive disease with poor OS. Palliative care team intervention was associated with less administration of CT in the last month of life. These results highlight the need to better anticipate the time to stop CT treatment in the end-of-life and the importance of an active collaboration between oncology and palliative care teams.

QUALITY OF LIFE OF PATIENTS RECEIVING HOME-BASED PALLIATIVE CARE FROM FAMILY PHYSICIANS AND MOBILE PALLIATIVE CARE TEAM.

OBJECTIVE: The aim: To evaluate the quality of life (QoL) of palliative patients receiving general palliative care and the impact of palliative care provided by mobile palliative care team (MPCT) on their QoL. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Materials and methods: European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core30 (QLQ-C30) was used to evaluate QoL of 219 palliative patients receiving general palliative care from family physicians in the Center for primary health care of Uzhhorod city, Ukraine. In the second part of the study, the subgroup of 25 patients who had at least one of fifteen QLQ-C30 scales evaluated lower than 50 points were selected. They were provided with PC from the MPCT for 2 weeks and their QoL was measured again. RESULTS: Results: For the patients who received general palliative care from a family physicians mean m (SD) QoL value was 38.63 (16.9), and the main symptoms that affected QoL were fatigue 48.60 (23.30) and pain 46.11 (20.97). The most impact on QoL scores had role (rs=0,430;), emotional (0.321) and physical (0.301) functioning and such symptoms as pain (-0.392), insomnia (-0.311), dyspnoea (-0.294), financial difficulties (-0.255). For the patients who received palliative care from MPCT mean the mean QoL score increased by 30.0 points, mean pain score decreased by 42.22 points, fatigue score decreased by 38.0 points and level of financial difficulties also decreased by 76.0 points. CONCLUSION: Conclusions: The involvement of the MPCT could have a significant positive impact on the QoL of palliative patients.

The Hospice as a Learning Environment: A Follow-Up Study with a Palliative Care Team.

In Western society, the topic of death has been removed from everyday life and replaced with medical language. Such censorship does not reduce individuals' fear of death, but rather limits their ability to elaborate their experiences of death, thus generating negative effects. The objective of this follow-up qualitative study was to detect how and if death education can help to improve individuals' relationship with death and enhance care environments like hospices. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with palliative care professionals and teachers who had taken part in a death education initiative three years earlier. The results confirmed the initiative's positive effect on both palliative care professionals and teachers. The participants reported that the education initiative helped them to positively modify their perspective on death, end-of-life care, and their own relationship to life, as well as their perception of community attitudes towards the hospice, which seemed to become less discriminatory. This study confirmed that school education initiatives can usefully create continuity between hospices and local communities. This project provided an educational space wherein it was possible for participants to elaborate their experiences in relation to death and to re-evaluate and appreciate hospices.

Dying patients with COVID-19: What should Hospital Palliative Care Teams (HPCTs) be prepared for?

OBJECTIVE: The COVID-19 pandemic is a care crisis of unknown duration which has seemingly not yet reached its peak in many countries. A significant number of elderly and frail people and those with underlying serious illness will continue to develop severe forms of the COVID-19 infection. Most of them are not eligible for intensive care treatment but can still expect palliative care - in many cases provided by a Hospital Palliative Care Team (HPCT). Several teams have already gained experience in caring for these patients and their families, others are preparing for it. METHOD: We report on a COVID-19 patient with pre-existing acute myeloid leukemia who was looked after by a HPCT until death. We discuss the challenges and difficulties while caring for COVID-19-positive palliative patients in a non-ICU setting. RESULTS: Hospitalization of the patient in an isolation ward caused an enormous burden for the dying patient and his family. Symptom control was particularly difficult because of rapid deteriorating dyspnea and the scarce presence of medical staff in the patient's room. SIGNIFICANCE OF RESULTS: COVID-19 patients who are not eligible for ICU treatment may have a particularly high need for palliative care. Since beds in specialist palliative care units are limited, the HPCT should be prepared to care for these patients. They may offer support in decision-making, optimize symptom control, and provide psychosocial care for patients and their families. Visiting restrictions aimed to protect the general public must be weighted against the patient's and family's suffering.

A phenomenological study of nurses experience about their palliative approach and their use of mobile palliative care teams in medical and surgical care units in France.

BACKGROUND: Despite a broad consensus and recommendations, numerous international reports or studies have shown the difficulties of implementing palliative care within healthcare services. The objective of this study was to understand the palliative approach of registered nurses in hospital medical and surgical care units and their use of mobile palliative care teams. METHODS: Qualitative study using individual in depth semi-structured interviews and focus group of registered nurses. Data were analyzed using a semiopragmatic phenomenological analysis. Expert nurses of mobile palliative care team carried out this study. 20 registered nurses from three different hospitals in France agreed to participate. RESULTS: Nurses recognize their role as being witnesses to the patient's experience through their constant presence. This is in line with their professional values and gives them an "alert role" that can anticipate a patient-centered palliative approach. The physician's positioning on palliative care plays a key role in its implementation. The lack of recognition of the individual role of the nurse leads to a questioning of her/his professional values, causing inappropriate behavior and distress. According to nurses, "rethinking care within a team environment" allows for the anticipation of a patient-centered palliative approach. Mobile Palliative Care Team highlights the major role of physicians-nurses "balance" while providing personal and professional support. CONCLUSIONS: The Physician's positioning and attitude toward palliative approach sets the tone for its early implementation and determines the behavior of different staff members within healthcare service. "Recognition at work", specifically "recognition of the individual role of nurse" is an essential concept for understanding what causes the delay in the implementation of a palliative approach. Interprofessional training (physicians and nurses) could optimize sharing expertise. Registered nurses consider MPCT as a "facilitating intermediary" within the healthcare service improving communication. Restoring a balance in sharing care and decision between physicians and other caregivers lead care teams to an anticipated and patient-centered palliative approach according to guidelines.

Palliative Care Consultation Is Underutilized in Critically Ill General Surgery Patients.

BACKGROUND: American College of Surgeons recommends palliative care and surgeons collaborate on the care of patients with poor prognoses. These collaborations are done to discuss symptom management and goals of care. However, contemporary practice patterns of palliative care consultation for surgical patients are poorly defined. We aim to describe the use of palliative care consultation for patients admitted to our institution's surgical services who died during their index hospital admission. METHODS: The Duke Enterprise Data Unified Content Explorer 2014 to 2016 was queried for patients admitted to general surgery services who died during their admission. Secondary measures included length of stay, time spent in consultation, days from consultation to death, and execution of a care plan. RESULTS: Of the 105 patients identified, 6 died on the day of admission, and 39 (37%) received palliative care consultation. Our data showed that patients who received consultation were generally older, white, and insured. Median number of days between palliative consult and death was 3 days (interquartile range: 1-8). Goals-of-care conversations were the indication for consultation in 62.5% of patients. The proposed plan by the consultants was congruent with the primary team in 66.7% of cases. CONCLUSIONS: Palliative care consultations were underutilized in surgical patients who died while admitted to the general surgical service at our institution. When palliative care is consulted, the plan of the primary surgical team and the palliative team align. Identification of barriers to consultation and promotion of the benefits of palliative care among surgical teams is warranted.