Patient COUNTS: A pilot navigation program for Asian American cancer patients.

Many Asian American cancer patients face barriers to cancer care but little is known about their navigational needs. We designed and implemented a pilot study to provide culturally- and linguistically-appropriate navigation for Asian American cancer patients. We recruited Asian American adults age 21+ years, who spoke English, Cantonese, Mandarin, or Vietnamese, with newly diagnosed, stage I-III colorectal, liver, or lung cancer in the Northern California Bay Area. Participants were assigned a language-concordant patient navigator, who provided support and resources over 6 months. Surveys were administered at baseline, 3-, and 6-months to assess sociodemographic characteristics, healthcare access, quality of life (FACT-G), and cancer care needs. Participants' mean age was 65 years (range 38-81); 62% were men, 67% spoke Chinese, and 75% reported limited English proficiency. Forty-two percent of participants had lung, 38% colorectal, and 21% liver cancer. Of 24 participants who enrolled, 67% completed the program and 75% completed standard of care cancer treatment. The average total FACT-G score was 72.6 (SD 17) at baseline, 68.0 (SD 20) at 3 months, and 69.9 (SD 22) at 6 months. All participants reported that the program was culturally appropriate and would recommend it. Asian American cancer patients in a patient navigation program reported lower quality of life compared to the general adult cancer population. Even with navigation, 75% of participants reported completing standard of care treatment. While participants were satisfied with the program, more research is needed to address the quality of cancer care Asian American cancer patients receive.

Barriers to identifying and addressing health-related social needs in cancer care: Patient and patient navigator perspectives.

BACKGROUND: The study aimed to gain insight into the experiences of patients with cancer and survivors regarding the integration of social needs assessment into their care, while also gathering perspectives from patient navigators on the barriers to obtaining and utilizing social needs information during cancer care, which taken together may influence cancer care policies. By comparing the perspectives of patients and navigators, the study sought to inform best practices for integrating, identifying, and addressing social needs to improve patient experiences and outcomes. METHODS: We conducted qualitative interviews and self-report surveys involving patients with cancer, providers, and patient navigators or care coordinators, seeking their insights and firsthand experiences related to health-related social needs in cancer care. Interviews were transcribed, separated into memos of main themes based on deductive coding, and further analyzed for new emergent themes using inductive coding. RESULTS: The present analysis focuses solely on the perspectives of 20 patient navigators and 21 patients. Qualitative analyses revealed two overarching themes: Theme 1: Personal and health system-related factors may create barriers for patients to disclose health-related social needs information during cancer care; and Theme 2: When social needs are identified, it is best practice to acknowledge and address social needs through referrals, resources, timely follow-up, and continued care coordination. Key barriers include individual beliefs and attitudes, concerns regarding privacy and sensitivity of questions, uncertainties about the outcomes of disclosing information, and patient-provider relationships and trust. CONCLUSION: Drawing upon the perspectives of patients and patient navigators provided valuable insight into the challenges associated with acquiring information on social needs. Their viewpoints presented feasible solutions to overcome barriers through early acknowledgment of patient needs, timely resource provision, and maintaining consistent follow-up actions. Additionally, it enhanced understanding of the pivotal role patient navigators play in oncology, serving as crucial links between screening for health-related social needs and addressing individual patient requirements. POLICY SUMMARY: The policies and policy improvements our paper seeks to impact include: inequalities in cancer care and health-related social needs of cancer.

A qualitative investigation into the effectiveness of a housing navigator program linking justice-involved clients with recovery housing.

BACKGROUND: Roughly 24-36% of people who are incarcerated in the U.S. are formally diagnosed with opioid use disorder (OUD). Once released, individuals involved with the criminal legal system (CLS) face increased risks of return to use and fatality and are 129 times more likely to die from an overdose within the first two weeks of release compared to those without CLS involvement. People who are CLS-involved and who are seeking a recovery living environment can access temporary stable housing through recovery homes. However, entering a recovery home can be difficult due to fragmentation among recovery housing organizations and their non-uniform application and screening procedures. A navigation pilot program was implemented to provide clients with recovery home placement advice, pre-screening, and referrals in Cook County, IL. Existing research on recovery homes has rarely examined the importance of recovery housing navigation for enhancing service engagement among CLS-involved individuals receiving medications for OUD. METHODS: Semi-structured qualitative interviews were conducted with 22 clients and three recovery housing navigators as part of a program evaluation of the navigation program pilot. Qualitative software was used to organize and qualitatively analyze transcripts through several rounds of coding producing emergent themes, which were then triangulated, and expanded using navigator data. RESULTS: Clients seeking recovery home services reported multiple prior challenges securing safe and supportive recovery living environments. Despite low initial expectations, clients described their interactions with housing navigators in favorable terms and felt navigators worked with them effectively to identify and meet their housing and substance use needs in a timely manner. Clients also commented on their partnerships with the navigator throughout the process. Interactions with navigators also calmed fears of rejection many clients had previously experienced and still harbored about the process, which bolstered client-navigator relationships and client motivation to engage with additional services. CONCLUSION: Evidence from this study suggests recovery home navigation can improve the speed and efficiency with which clients are connected to appropriate services that are tailored to their specific needs as well as increase client motivation to engage with a myriad of recovery services.

Guides for facilitating the implementation and evaluation of social prescribing: lessons from the "Access to Resources in the Community" model. / Guides visant à faciliter la mise en oeuvre et l'évaluation de la prescription sociale : leçons tirées du modèle « Accès aux ressources communautaires ¼.

Social prescribing (SP) embodies a comprehensive approach to addressing the social determinants of health. Access to Resources in the Community (ARC) is an innovative SP program offering bilingual services that involves a single point of entry for health and social needs and introduces practice changes to assist primary care providers in engaging patients, along with a nonclinical lay navigator who supports patients in accessing relevant community resources. The ARC team has created a SP toolkit offering practical guidance for setting up, implementing, monitoring the progress of and evaluating SP programs. The four ARC guides can be easily customized for application in diverse practice and research settings.

We developed a set of guides for use in "Access to Resources in the Community" (ARC), one of the first social prescribing (SP) programs established and evaluated in Ontario, Canada. The four guides are: (1) PC Practice Set Up, (2) Navigator Training, (3) Navigation Processes and (4) Evaluation. The guides provide practical guidance for establishing, conducting and monitoring progress, and evaluating SP programs; they form the basis of a toolkit we created to support organizations and researchers in establishing and evaluating SP programs. The guides and toolkit are currently being adopted for the ARC/211- Ontario program that we are cocreating through a nonprofit research partnership with Community Connections, an innovative hub of 211 Ontario in Collingwood. The program will help generate evidence on the feasibility, effectiveness, impact on health inequities and cost-effectiveness of adapting and scaling up SP programs in Canada.

Nous avons mis au point quatre guides à utiliser dans le cadre du programme « Accès aux ressources communautaires ¼ (ARC), l'un des premiers programmes de prescription sociale reconnus et évalués en Ontario (Canada). Les quatre guides sont 1) Préparation du cabinet de soins primaires, 2) Formation des intervenants pivots, 3) Processus d'intervention pivot et 4) Évaluation. Ces guides fournissent des conseils pratiques sur l'établissement, la tenue et l'évaluation de programmes de prescription sociale ainsi que sur le suivi des progrès, constituant ansi la base d'une trousse d'outils créée pour aider les organisations et les chercheurs à établir et à évaluer des programmes de prescription sociale. Les guides et la trousse d'outils sont en cours d'adoption dans le cadre du programme ARC/211-Ontario que nous sommes en train de cocréer grâce à un partenariat de recherche sans but lucratif avec Community Connection, un carrefour novateur situé à Collingwood et qui relève de 211 Ontario. Ce programme contribuera à générer des données probantes sur la faisabilité, l'efficacité, la rentabilité et l'incidence (du point de vue des inégalités en matière de santé) de l'adaptation et de l'application à grande échelle des programmes de prescription sociale au Canada.

A Cancer Patient Navigation Training Program for Limited-Resource Settings: Results from 5 Years of Training.

Limited research exists on the effectiveness of cancer patient navigation (CPN) in limited-resource countries which are challenging for patients to navigate. The aim of this study was to report on the workflow, resources developed, and outcomes of pilot CPN program developed by the Caribbean Cancer Research Institute (CCRI) in the limited-resource country of Trinidad and Tobago. Three part-time navigators and a part-time program manager were trained in CPN and hired by the CCRI. A network of local service providers, program policies, an electronic medical records system, and informational blog posts were developed to support the pilot. Patients were referred at monthly multi-disciplinary team meetings of the Sangre Grande Hospital. Navigators provided navigation services for a maximum of 10 h. Changes in distress before and after navigation were measured using the National Comprehensive Cancer Network distress thermometer and evaluated using a paired t-test. Patient satisfaction with the navigator and the navigation service was evaluated in a post-navigation survey. One hundred and fifty-eight breast, prostate, pancreatic, and colon cancer patients were navigated. There was an average of 14 contacts between patient and navigator with an average of 30 min per contact. There were 631 barriers identified of which physical (27%; n = 172), informational (26%; n = 164), and emotional or psychological (25%; n = 158) were the top three most frequently reported. Resolutions were offered for 62% (n = 391) of reported barriers. The CPN intervention resulted in a statistically significant reduction in patient distress overall (- 2.4 [2.07-2.79], < 0.001) and across most patient subgroups. Almost all patients reported high satisfaction with navigation. CPN significantly improved patient distress, and patients reported high satisfaction with navigation in the limited-resource setting of Trinidad and Tobago.

Achieving equitable lung cancer screening implementation in a Texas safety net health system.

INTRODUCTION: A lung cancer screening program using low dose CT (LDCT) in a Federally Qualified Health Center (FQHC) in Central Texas was developed and assessed for equitable implementation. METHODS: From 11/2020-8/2023, patients aged 55-77 years who currently smoked or quit within 15 years with ≥ 20 pack-years of exposure were identified through EHR query and mailed outreach, or through direct provider referrals. A bilingual social worker confirmed eligibility, provided tele-care shared decision-making (SDM), coordinated screening, and offered smoking cessation. To assess equity, LDCT completion across demographics was compared, in 2023. RESULTS: 6,486 patients were mailed outreach materials; 479 patients responded, of whom 108 (22.5%) were eligible and 71 (65.7%) participated in SDM. 629 eligible patients were referred internally; 579 (92.0%) completed SDM. Of the 650 patients who completed SDM, 636 (97.8%) agreed to screening. Mean age was 61.7; 38.1% were female. The population was diverse: 35.8% identified as Latino, 17.8% as African-American, 26.8% had Medicare or Medicaid, 48.0% used the county medical assistance program, 14.2% were uninsured, and 76.7% currently smoked. Overall, 528 (83.0%) patients completed LDCT. There were no statistically significant differences in completion by age, gender, race/ethnicity, or insurance status. Spanish-speaking patients were more likely to complete the CT than English speakers (OR 2.22, 95% CI 1.22, 4.41) and those who formerly smoked were more likely to complete the CT than patients who currently smoked (OR 1.93, 95% CI 1.12, 3.51). CONCLUSIONS: The navigator-centered program achieved equitable implementation of lung cancer screening in a diverse FQHC system.

Patients' experiences with 'sludge' (administrative burden) in the cancer screening process and its relationship with screening completion, experience and health system distrust.

OBJECTIVE: 'Sludge' refers to administrative burdens or frictions that preclude people from getting what they want or need (eg, duplicative forms, complicated instructions, long waiting times). This mixed methods study evaluated patients' perceptions of sludge in the colorectal cancer (CRC) screening process and some impacts of this sludge. DESIGN: We employed an exploratory sequential mixed methods study design that comprised patient interviews and a patient survey. The interviews informed final survey revisions and captured contextual data about patients' experiences with sludge. Interview transcripts were inductively and deductively analysed to identify overarching themes. The survey quantified sludge, delayed or forgone screenings, screening experience (Net Promoter Score) and health system distrust (Health System Distrust Scale). We used χ2 or t-tests for univariable comparisons and logistic or linear regressions to evaluate the association between cumulative sludge score and delayed or forgone screenings, screening experience and health system distrust. Results were integrated for interpretation. SETTING: Southeastern United States. PARTICIPANTS: Patients who were 45-75 years of age, at average risk for CRC and had either completed or been referred for CRC screening (colonoscopy or stool-based test) within the previous 12 months. RESULTS: 22 interview participants and 255 survey participants completed the study. 38 (15%) survey participants rated their screening experience as poor (Net Promoter Score=0-7 out of 10). The mean (SD) Health System Distrust Scale score was 22.4 (6.3) out of 45 possible points (higher score=greater distrust). Perceptions of sludge in the CRC screening process varied, with long waiting times and burdensome communication being the most common sources (58% and 35% of participants, respectively). Sludge was positively associated with delayed or forgone screenings (OR=1.42, 95% CI 1.28, 1.57, p<0.001), poor screening experience (OR=1.15, 95% CI 1.04, 1.28, p=0.009) and health system distrust (ß=0.47, p<0.001). Qualitative findings add descriptive detail about sludge encountered, context to impacts experienced, and illustrate the heavy emotional impact of sludge: 'it just isn't worth it'. CONCLUSION: Efforts to reduce sludge in the CRC screening process may improve timely completion of CRC screening, enhance patient experience and restore trust in the health system.

Advancing Patient Navigation for HIV: Evaluating Models of Care for Housing and Employment.

People with HIV face challenges securing housing and employment. Patient navigation is an effective intervention that can improve the receipt of these services, which have been linked to better health outcomes. The purpose of this study was to assess implementation of patient navigation in diverse delivery settings. We also evaluated the relationship between these services and health outcomes among participants. Twelve sites in the United States (N = 1,082) implemented navigation using single or multiple navigator interventions to improve housing, employment, viral suppression, and retention in care. Sites included health departments, health centers, and AIDS service organizations (ASO). Client-level data were used to model relationships of interest. Across the 12 sites, regardless of model, housing (odds ratio (OR) = 1.18, p < .001), employment (OR = 1.09, p < .001) and retention in care (OR 1.11, p = .007) improved significantly over time; however, viral suppression did not (OR = 1.04, p = .120). Regardless of model of care, patient navigation improved housing, employment, and retention in care. This study demonstrated that while navigation supports people with HIV in securing housing and employment, models using a more intensive format worked best in specific settings. While most studies focus on unimodal strategies, this study builds on the evidence by examining how navigation models can be delivered to reduce barriers to care.

Characteristics of Existing Online Patient Navigation Interventions: Scoping Review.

BACKGROUND: Patient navigation interventions (PNIs) can provide personalized support and promote appropriate coordination or continuation of health and social care services. Online PNIs have demonstrated excellent potential for improving patient knowledge, transition readiness, self-efficacy, and use of services. However, the characteristics (ie, intervention type, mode of delivery, duration, frequency, outcomes and outcome measures, underlying theories or mechanisms of change of the intervention, and impact) of existing online PNIs to support the health and social needs of individuals with illness remain unclear. OBJECTIVE: This scoping review of the existing literature aims to identify the characteristics of existing online PNIs reported in the literature. METHODS: A scoping review based on the guidelines outlined in the Joanna Briggs Institute framework was conducted. A search for peer-reviewed literature published between 1989 and 2022 on online PNIs was conducted using MEDLINE, CINAHL, Embase, PsycInfo, and Cochrane Library databases. Two independent reviewers conducted 2 levels of screening. Data abstraction was conducted to outline key study characteristics (eg, study design, population, and intervention characteristics). The data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and qualitative content analysis. RESULTS: A total of 100 studies met the inclusion criteria. Our findings indicate that a variety of study designs are used to describe and evaluate online PNIs, with literature being published between 2003 and 2022 in Western countries. Of these studies, 39 (39%) studies were randomized controlled trials. In addition, we noticed an increase in reported online PNIs since 2019. The majority of studies involved White females with a diagnosis of cancer and a lack of participants aged 70 years or older was observed. Most online PNIs provide support through navigation, self-management and lifestyle changes, counseling, coaching, education, or a combination of support. Variation was noted in terms of mode of delivery, duration, and frequency. Only a small number of studies described theoretical frameworks or change mechanisms to guide intervention. CONCLUSIONS: To our knowledge, this is the first review to comprehensively synthesize the existing literature on online PNIs, by focusing on the characteristics of interventions and studies in this area. Inconsistency in reporting the country of publication, population characteristics, duration and frequency of interventions, and a lack of the use of underlying theories and working mechanisms to inform intervention development, provide guidance for the reporting of future online PNIs.

Patient engagement in the development and implementation of navigation services: a scoping review protocol.

INTRODUCTION: Patient navigation, a complex health intervention meant to address widespread fragmentation across the healthcare landscape, has been widely adopted internationally. This rapid uptake in patient navigation has led to a broadening of the service's reach to include those of different social positions and different health conditions. Despite the popularity and prevalence of patient navigation programmes, the extent of patient involvement and/or partnership in their construction has yet to be articulated. This scoping review will explore and describe the extent to which patients have been engaged in the development and/or implementation of patient navigation programmes to date. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This scoping review will adhere to the Arksey and O'Malley framework for conducting scoping reviews. The electronic databases MEDLINE, CINAHL, EMBASE, PsycINFO, SocINDEX and Scopus were searched in September 2023 using terms related to patient navigation and programme implementation. Inclusion criteria stipulate that the studies must: (1) include an intervention labelled as 'navigation' in a healthcare setting and (2) describe patient engagement in the design, development and/or implementation process of said patient navigation programme. To assess study eligibility, two reviewers will independently read through the titles and abstracts, followed by the full texts, of each study identified from the search strategy to determine whether they meet inclusion criteria. Reviewers will then extract data from the included studies, present descriptive study characteristics in tables, and perform qualitative content analysis. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This review does not require ethics approval as data will be collated exclusively from peer-reviewed articles and thesis dissertations. A manuscript summarising the results of the review will be written and submitted to a peer-reviewed journal for publication. The review will map aspects of programme development that have repeatedly utilised patient perspectives and areas where engagement has lagged. This review will also depict how patient engagement varies across programme characteristics.

African American patient and caregiver attitudes and perceptions of community health workers as lay patient navigators in palliative care.

BACKGROUND: Concurrent palliative care for patients with advanced cancer has been shown to reduce physical and psychological symptoms, and improve the quality of life of patients with advanced cancer. Underutilization of palliative care services, especially among African American patients with advanced cancer, remains an important public health problem. To address this gap, we developed a community health worker (CHW) palliative care intervention for African American patients with advanced cancer, which is being formally assessed through an ongoing effectiveness-implementation trial (NCT05407844). As part of the preparatory phase of this study, we conducted qualitative interviews with African American patients with advanced cancer and their caregivers. The objective of this analysis was to explore patient and caregiver attitudes and perceptions of the CHW palliative care intervention to support African American patients with advanced cancer in accessing palliative care. METHODS: We used purposive sampling to identify African American patients with advanced cancer and their informal caregivers from clinic lists and through referring oncologists. We conducted six individual and group semi-structured interviews with patients and caregivers between November 2022 and April 2023 at three enrollment sites: Johns Hopkins Hospital, TidalHealth Peninsula Regional, and University of Alabama at Birmingham Hospital. The interview guide was informed by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research, with a focus on the Innovation and Inner Setting domains. We used the framework method for thematic analysis. RESULTS: Overall, there was a lack of awareness and understanding of palliative care, due primarily to limited experiences with palliative care services among study participants. Despite this lack of familiarity, participants recognized the potential benefits of palliative care for patients with advanced cancer. All study participants were enthusiastic about the concept of patient navigation and the CHW palliative care intervention, with CHWs as lay patient navigators in palliative care. When reflecting on their own experiences, patients and their caregivers identified several areas where CHWs may have supported their cancer care, such as care coordination. Study participants viewed the CHW palliative care intervention as fulfilling a need within the African American community. Participants also made intervention delivery recommendations related to CHW characteristics, training and integration, and communication. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides evidence for the acceptability of a CHW palliative care intervention for African American patients with advanced cancer and their caregivers. The findings of this study have led to intervention refinement, which will enhance implementation, delivery, and sustainability of the intervention.

The randomized controlled trial (NAVKIDS2) of a patient navigator program created for children with chronic kidney disease.

Patient navigators enable adult patients to circumnavigate complex health systems, improving access to health care and outcomes. Here, we aimed to evaluate the effects of a patient navigation program in children with chronic kidney disease (CKD). In this multi-center, randomized controlled trial, we randomly assigned children (aged 0-16 years) with CKD stages 1-5 (including children on dialysis or with kidney transplants), from low socioeconomic status backgrounds, and/or residing in remote areas, to receive patient navigation at randomization (immediate) or at six months (waitlist). The primary outcome was self-rated health (SRH) of participating children at six months, using intention to treat analysis. Secondary outcomes included caregivers' SRH and satisfaction with health care, children's quality of life, hospitalizations, and missed school days. Repeated measures of the primary outcome from baseline to six months were analyzed using cumulative logit mixed effects models. Semi-structured interviews were thematically evaluated. Of 398 screened children, 162 were randomized (80 immediate and 82 waitlist); mean age (standard deviation) of 8.8 (4.8) years with 64.8% male. SRH was not significantly different between the immediate and wait-listed groups at six months. There were also no differences across all secondary outcomes between the two groups. Caregivers' perspectives were reflected in seven themes: easing mental strain, facilitating care coordination, strengthening capacity to provide care, reinforcing care collaborations, alleviating family tensions, inability to build rapport and unnecessary support. Thus, in children with CKD, self-rated health may not improve in response to a navigator program, but caregivers gained skills related to providing and accessing care.

Development of a nurse navigation program for cancer pain.

Objective: Cancer pain significantly impacts the overall quality of life of cancer patients, necessitating proactive management. The manifestations of cancer pain vary individually and require tailored interventions to address each patient's unique characteristics. Therefore, this study aims to develop a nurse navigation program for cancer pain (NNP-CP) tailored to the needs of cancer patients requiring pain control, aiming to establish evidence-based clinical nursing practices and promote effective cancer pain management. Methods: This study is a methodological research into developing a pain management program led by nurses for cancer patients requiring pain control, based on a professional navigation framework. The development of the program relied on three out of the five stages of the ADDIE (Analysis, Design, Development, Implementation, Evaluation) model. Results: A literature review was conducted to select the content and rationale to be included in the intervention program. Publications within the last 10 years in English or Korean were identified and screened based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) 2020 literature selection flow, 17 articles were included. Standardized information regarding cancer pain control was based on the 7th edition of 'Cancer Pain Management Guidelines'. The initial draft of the pain management intervention program was developed by organizing and structuring the derived content based on the professional navigation framework. Subsequently, the final intervention program was confirmed through the review by six clinical experts specializing in cancer pain. Conclusions: Cancer pain is a significant factor that profoundly influences the quality of life and survival duration of cancer patients. While appropriate management methods offer the prospect of control, insufficient intervention is the current reality. Through the pain management intervention program based on the expert navigation framework that promotes continuity of care and empowers the recipients, this study anticipates not only pain reduction in cancer patients but also an enhancement in their quality of life.

Enhancing Patient Outcomes Through Integrated Education and Navigation Programs at the Breast Cancer Comprehensive Center, National Cancer Institute, Cairo University.

Breast cancer remains a significant global health challenge, particularly in low- and middle-income countries where disparities in healthcare exacerbate the disease burden. The Breast Cancer Comprehensive Center at the National Cancer Institute, Cairo University, has implemented integrated patient navigation and education programs aimed at enhancing patient outcomes and healthcare quality. This study evaluated the effectiveness of these programs involving 2202 participants over 12 months. The methodology included systematic data collection, material preparation, and the application of tailored educational strategies to facilitate the patient's journey from diagnosis to treatment. The study utilized three-phased patient navigation assistance to provide comprehensive support. The programs significantly improved patient satisfaction, with over 90% of participants reporting high levels of contentment with the services received. Key improvements included enhanced understanding of breast cancer (including risk factors, symptoms, importance of seeking early care, and treatment options), reduction in patient anxiety, improved treatment adherence, and streamlined diagnostic and treatment processes. Notably, the use of audio-visual educational tools effectively bridged the literacy gap among patients. The integration of patient navigation and education systems at BCCC-NCI has proven to be a highly effective model for improving breast cancer care. This model not only enhances patient understanding and treatment compliance but also facilitates a more efficient healthcare process. The study underscores the potential for replicating this approach in similar healthcare settings globally, suggesting that such integrations can significantly improve cancer care outcomes.

Implementation of social needs screening for minoritized patients newly diagnosed with breast cancer: a mixed methods evaluation in a pragmatic patient navigation trial.

BACKGROUND: Social needs inhibit receipt of timely medical care. Social needs screening is a vital part of comprehensive cancer care, and patient navigators are well-positioned to screen for and address social needs. This mixed methods project describes social needs screening implementation in a prospective pragmatic patient navigation intervention trial for minoritized women newly diagnosed with breast cancer. METHODS: Translating Research Into Practice (TRIP) was conducted at five cancer care sites in Boston, MA from 2018 to 2022. The patient navigation intervention protocol included completion of a social needs screening survey covering 9 domains (e.g., food, transportation) within 90 days of intake. We estimated the proportion of patients who received a social needs screening within 90 days of navigation intake. A multivariable log binomial regression model estimated the adjusted rate ratios (aRR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) of patient socio-demographic characteristics and screening delivery. Key informant interviews with navigators (n = 8) and patients (n = 21) assessed screening acceptability and factors that facilitate and impede implementation. Using a convergent, parallel mixed methods approach, findings from each data source were integrated to interpret study results. RESULTS: Patients' (n = 588) mean age was 59 (SD = 13); 45% were non-Hispanic Black and 27% were Hispanic. Sixty-nine percent of patients in the navigators' caseloads received social needs screening. Patients of non-Hispanic Black race/ethnicity (aRR = 1.25; 95% CI = 1.06-1.48) and those with Medicare insurance (aRR = 1.13; 95% CI = 1.04-1.23) were more likely to be screened. Screening was universally acceptable to navigators and generally acceptable to patients. Systems-based supports for improving implementation were identified. CONCLUSIONS: Social needs screening was acceptable, yet with modest implementation. Continued systems-based efforts to integrate social needs screening in medical care are needed.

Ruthlessly Subtract to Build Oncology Programs and Add Value.

Building modern healthcare programs and systems caring for populations requires expert skills in strategy, finance, people operations, workflow, evaluation, and more. Build often connotes adding services and people, but it al.

Yorkshire Lung Screening Trial (YLST) pathway navigation study: a protocol for a nested randomised controlled trial to evaluate the effect of a pathway navigation intervention on lung cancer screening uptake.

INTRODUCTION: Lung cancer is the most common cause of cancer death globally. In 2022 the UK National Screening Committee recommended the implementation of a national targeted lung cancer screening programme, aiming to improve early diagnosis and survival rates. Research studies and services internationally consistently observe socioeconomic and smoking-related inequalities in screening uptake. Pathway navigation (PN) is a process through which a trained pathway navigator guides people to overcome barriers to accessing healthcare services, including screening. This nested randomised controlled trial aims to determine whether a PN intervention results in more individuals participating in lung cancer screening compared with the usual written invitation within a previous non-responder population as part of the Yorkshire Lung Screening Trial (YLST). METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A two-arm randomised controlled trial and process evaluation nested within the YLST. Participants aged 55-80 (inclusive) who have not responded to previous postal invitations to screening will be randomised by household to receive PN or usual care (a further postal invitation to contact the screening service for a lung health check) between March 2023 and October 2024. The PN intervention includes a postal appointment notification and prearranged telephone appointment, during which a pathway navigator telephones the participant, following a four-step protocol to introduce the offer and conduct an initial risk assessment. If eligible, participants are invited to book a low-dose CT (LDCT) lung cancer screening scan. All pathway navigators receive training from behavioural psychologists on motivational interviewing and communication techniques to elicit barriers to screening attendance and offer solutions. COPRIMARY OUTCOMES: The number undergoing initial telephone assessment of lung cancer risk. The number undergoing an LDCT screening scan.Secondary outcomes include demographic, clinical and risk parameters of people undergoing telephone risk assessment; the number of people eligible for screening following telephone risk assessment; the number of screen-detected cancers diagnosed; costs and a mixed-methods process evaluation.Descriptive analyses will be used to present numbers, proportions and quantitative components of the process evaluation. Primary comparisons of differences between groups will be made using logistic regression. Applied thematic analysis will be used to interpret qualitative data within a conceptual framework based on the COM-B framework. A health economic analysis of the PN intervention will also be conducted. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study is approved by the Greater Manchester West Research Ethics Committee (18-NW-0012) and the Health Research Authority following the Confidentiality Advisory Group review. Results will be shared through peer-reviewed scientific journals, conference presentations and on the YLST website. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBERS: ISRCTN42704678 and NCT03750110.

Supporting ColoREctal Equitable Navigation (SCREEN): a protocol for a stepped-wedge cluster randomized trial for patient navigation in primary care.

BACKGROUND: Black individuals in the United States (US) have a higher incidence of and mortality from colorectal cancer (CRC) compared to other racial groups, and CRC is the second leading cause of death among Hispanic/Latino populations in the US. Patient navigation is an evidence-based approach to narrow inequities in cancer screening among Black and Hispanic/Latino patients. Despite this, limited healthcare systems have implemented patient navigation for screening at scale. METHODS: We are conducting a stepped-wedge cluster randomized trial of 15 primary care clinics with six steps of six-month duration to scale a patient navigation program to improve screening rates among Black and Hispanic/Latino patients. After six months of baseline data collection with no intervention we will randomize clinics, whereby three clinics will join the intervention arm every six months until all clinics cross over to intervention. During the intervention roll out we will conduct training and education for clinics, change infrastructure in the electronic health record, create stakeholder relationships, assess readiness, and deliver iterative feedback. Framed by the Practical, Robust Implementation Sustainment Model (PRISM) we will focus on effectiveness, reach, provider adoption, and implementation. We will document adaptations to both the patient navigation intervention and to implementation strategies. To address health equity, we will engage multilevel stakeholder voices through interviews and a community advisory board to plan, deliver, adapt, measure, and disseminate study progress. Provider-level feedback will include updates on disparities in screening orders and completions. DISCUSSION: Primary care clinics are poised to close disparity gaps in CRC screening completion but may lack an understanding of the magnitude of these gaps and how to address them. We aim to understand how to tailor a patient navigation program for CRC screening to patients and providers across diverse clinics with wide variation in baseline screening rates, payor mix, proximity to specialty care, and patient volume. Findings from this study will inform other primary care practices and health systems on effective and sustainable strategies to deliver patient navigation for CRC screening among racial and ethnic minorities. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT06401174.

Planning for the forgotten fourth trimester of pregnancy: A parallel group randomized control trial to test a postpartum planning intervention vs. standard prenatal care.

BACKGROUND: Black and brown birthing people experience persistent disparities in adverse maternal health outcomes, partially due to inadequate perinatal care. The goal of this study is to design and evaluate a patient-centered intervention for obstetric patients with one or more cardiometabolic risk factors for severe maternal morbidity [gestational diabetes, diabetes mellitus, hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (chronic hypertension, preeclampsia, eclampsia, or gestational hypertension), or preconception obesity (BMI > 30)] to promote postpartum visit attendance. METHODS: To address identified unmet needs for postpartum support and barriers to postpartum care, we developed 20 thematic postpartum planning modules, each with corresponding patient educational materials, community resources, care coordination protocols, and clinician support tools (decision aids, electronic medical record prompts and fields). During prenatal care encounters, a research coordinator delivers the educational content (in English or Spanish), facilitates the participant's planning and shared decision-making, provides the participant with resources, and documents decisions in the electronic medical record. We will randomize 320 eligible patients with a 1:1 ratio to the intervention or standard prenatal care and evaluate the impact on postpartum visit attendance at 4-12 weeks and secondary outcomes (postpartum mental health, perceived future maternal and cardiometabolic risk, contraceptive use, primary care use, readmission, and patient satisfaction with care). DISCUSSION: Through engagement with patients and community stakeholders, we developed a guideline-based, locally tailored intervention to address drivers of engagement with postpartum care for high-risk obstetric patients. If demonstrated to be effective, the educational materials and electronic medical record based-tool can be adapted to other settings. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This trial was registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05430815) on June 23, 2022.

Adaptations to a patient navigation program for follow-up colonoscopy in rural primary care practices.

PURPOSE: Patient navigation is a recommended practice to improve cancer screenings among underserved populations including those residing in rural areas with care access barriers. We report on patient navigation programme adaptations to increase follow-up colonoscopy rates after abnormal fecal testing in rural primary care practices. METHODS: Participating clinics delivered a patient navigation programme to eligible patients from 28 affiliated clinics serving rural communities in Oregon clustered within 3 Medicaid health plans. Patient navigation adaptations were tracked using data sources including patient navigation training programme reflections, qualitative interviews, clinic meetings, and periodic reflections with practice facilitators. FINDINGS: Initial, planned (proactive) adaptations were made to address the rural context; later, unplanned (reactive) adaptations were implemented to address the impact of the COVID-19 global pandemic. Initial planned adaptations to the patient navigation programme were made before the main trial to address the needs of the rural context, including provider shortages and geographic dispersion limiting both patient access to care and training opportunities for providers. Later unplanned adaptations were made primarily in response to COVID-19 care suspension and staff redeployments and shortages that occurred during implementation. CONCLUSION: While unplanned adaptations were implemented to address the contextual impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on care access patterns and staffing, the changes to training content and context were beneficial to the rural setting overall and should be sustained. Our findings can guide future efforts to optimise the success of such programmes in other rural settings and highlight the important role of adaptations in implementation projects.