Comparison of quality of life after radical treatment in prostate cancer: radical prostatectomy versus external radiotherapy.

OBJECTIVE: To assess and compare the functional and quality of life results in patients treated with curative intent for localized prostate cancer during 2015 in our hospital. METHOD: 77 patients treated by radical prostatectomy or external radiotherapy with androgen deprivation were prospective enrolled. Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite for Clinical Practice (EPIC-CP) questionnaire at 3-year follow-up and Spanish Questionnaire on Quality of Life in Patients with Prostate Cancer (CAVIPRES-30) at diagnosis and at 3-year follow-up were registered. RESULTS: 68 patients were included, 39 patients treated by radical prostatectomy and 29 received external radiotherapy with androgen deprivation. Among the operated patients, 61.5% were dry and 17.9% use three or more daily pads, compared to 72.4% and 6.8%, respectively, in the radiotherapy group. 48.7% of prostatectomized patients reported very poor or no capacity to have a sufficiently rigid erection, compared to 69% of the radiated group. After surgery, 43.6% considered bad or very bad quality-of-life, compared to 68.9% in the radiotherapy group. In the comparison of the data of the pre- and post-treatment questionnaire can be seen that the patients had a superior perception before the procedure. CONCLUSIONS: Patients treated by surgery have a better perception of quality-of-life compared to those treated by radiotherapy.

OBJETIVO: Determinar y comparar los resultados funcionales y de calidad de vida de pacientes con cáncer de próstata tratados con intención curativa durante el año 2015 en nuestro centro. MÉTODO: Se incluyeron 77 pacientes sometidos a prostatectomía radical (PR) o radioterapia externa con terapia de deprivación androgénica (TDA). Se realizaron el Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite for Clinical Practice (EPIC-CP) tras 3 años de seguimiento y el Cuestionario Español de Calidad de Vida en Pacientes con Cáncer de Próstata (CAVIPRES-30) al diagnóstico y a los 3 años. RESULTADOS: Se incluyeron 68 pacientes, 39 con PR y 29 con radioterapia más TDA. De los pacientes intervenidos, el 61.5% están secos y el 17.9% usan tres o más compresas, diarias frente al 72.4% y el 6.8%, respectivamente, en el grupo de radioterapia. El 48.7% de los prostatectomizados refieren erecciones muy malas o ninguna, frente al 69% de los radiados. Tras la cirugía, el 43.6% refieren mala o muy mala calidad de vida, frente al 68.9% de los radiados. En la comparación de los datos del cuestionario pre- y postratamiento, los pacientes tenían una percepción superior antes del procedimiento. CONCLUSIONES: Los pacientes tratados mediante cirugía tienen una mejor percepción de su calidad de vida relacionada con la salud que los radiados.

State of art of robotic prostatectomy: the way we do it in Catalonia, Spain.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE: Robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (PLAR) seems to improve functional outcomes, however there is not a consensus of a standard procedure. The aim of this study was to identify the PLAR "state of art" in Catalonia, Spain. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This was a cross-sectional survey-based study conducted among urologists across Catalonia, Spain. The survey was distributed through online platforms and the professional urology society. All statistical analyses were performed using Stata software, v20. RESULTS: 59 urologists completed the survey, revealing PLAR as the most commonly used technique (79.7%). Most urologist (70%) create the pneumoperitoneum using a controlled incision with direct access and 78.3% use the Airseal technology. The intraperitoneal approach is performed in >90% of cases. Endopelvic fascia preservation is not routinely performed. 34.5% of the survey not perform the dorsal vein complex suture. All preserves the bladder neck when oncologically safe. Nerve-vascular bundles bleeding control is performed using standard coagulation or suturing. 34% performed posterior reconstruction. Only use hemostatic devices when evident bleeding and 70% does not routinely left a drainage. Multivariable analysis showed that center volume had a significant independent association with dorsal venous complex suturing (OR 0.073, 95%CI 0.07-0.826), nerve-vascular bundles suturing hemostasis (OR 11.67, 95%CI 1.07-127.60) and endopelvic fascia preservation (OR 13.64, 95%CI 1.087-201.27), but there was no correlation with time the bladder catheter or days hospitalized. CONCLUSIONS: The study provides an overview of the state of PLAR in Catalonia, Spain, showing significant variability and reflecting a commitment to advancing surgical technology and patient care.

Preliminary results of the implementation of robotic radical prostatectomy in a major ambulatory surgery regimen.

OBJECTIVE: To report our initial experience with robotic radical prostatectomy as an outpatient procedure. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Retrospective analysis of patients who underwent RRP as MAS (Major Ambulatory Surgery) at our center between March 2021 and May 2022. We collected baseline patient characteristics, intraoperative outcomes and postoperative data (need for unplanned medical care and complications at one month after surgery). Oncologic characteristics at disease diagnosis (PSA, staging, ISUP, MRI) and postoperative pathologic outcomes were collected. RESULTS: We identified a total of 35 patients with an average age of 60,8 ± 6,88 years and a BMI of 27 ± 2,9 Kg/m2. All patients had a low anesthetic risk and 25.71% had undergone previous abdominal surgery. The surgical time was 151,66 ± 42,15 min and the average blood loss was 301,2 ± 184,38 mL. Two patients (5.7%) were admitted for one night and 7 patients (20%) consulted the emergency department in the following month, of which 3 (8.57%) were readmitted. We recorded one intraoperative complication, seven mild postoperative complications (Clavien I-II) and one severe complication (Clavien IIIb). The severe complication occurred on the eighth postoperative day and was not related to the procedure being ambulatory. CONCLUSION: The absence of serious complications in the immediate postoperative period supports RRP in MAS as a safe technique for selected patients.

Incidencia de la disfunción sexual eréctil asociada a la prostatectomía radical abierta y laparoscópica

Introducción: la dificultad o imposibilidad de lograr una actividad sexual satisfactoria a pesar de estar presentes las condiciones adecuadas para su desarrollo exitoso, se conoce como disfunción sexual. Si la dificultad consiste en alcanzar y mantener la erección necesaria para una penetración se produce una disfunción eréctil. Objetivo: describir la disfunción eréctil en los pacientes con cáncer de próstata sometidos a prostatectomía radical por vía abierta vs. laparoscópica, en el Hospital Universitario Comandante Faustino Pérez Hernández, de Matanzas, entre enero de 2010 y enero de 2020. Materiales y métodos: se realizó un estudio longitudinal retrospectivo en los 40 pacientes que acudieron a la Consulta Provincial de Cáncer de Próstata y les fue realizado cirugía radical, entre enero de 2010 y enero de 2020. Resultados: el 52,5 % de los pacientes tienen un promedio de edad entre 65 y 74 años. Un índice de comorbilidad de Charlson de 3 a 5 puntos predominó en un 75 % de la muestra. En la vía laparoscópica, todos los casos presentaron disfunción eréctil, siendo severa en el 50 % de ellos. El 22,5 % del total no la tuvieron, representando un 30 % de los operados por cirugía abierta. Conclusiones: la prostatectomía radical continúa siendo considerada uno de los tratamientos de elección del cáncer de próstata órgano-confinado. La causa principal de la presencia de disfunción eréctil se atribuye al procedimiento quirúrgico; la edad avanzada puede contribuir a empeorar el pronóstico y las enfermedades coadyuvantes. Son heterogéneos los resultados en la esfera sexual de la prostatectomía radical laparoscópica y la prostatectomía radical abierta, comparados con la bibliografía internacional.

Introduction: the difficulty or impossibility of achieving a successful sexual activity despite being present the adequate conditions for its successful development is known as sexual dysfunction. If the difficulty consists in reaching and maintaining the erection necessary for a penetration, erectile dysfunction occurs. Objective: to describe the erectile dysfunction in patients with prostate cancer undergoing open vs. laparoscopic radical prostatectomy, in the Comandante Faustino Perez Hernandez University Hospital, of Matanzas, between January 2010 and January 2020. Materials and methods: a longitudinal retrospective study was carried out in the 40 patients who attended Prostate Cancer Provincial Consultation and underwent radical surgery between January 2010 and January 2020. Results: 52.5% of the patients were aged between 65 and 74 on average. A Charlson comorbidity index of 3 to 5 points prevailed in 75% of the sample. In the laparoscopic pathway all the cases presented erectile dysfunction, being severe in 50% of them. 22.5% of the total did not have it, representing 30% of those operated by open surgery. Conclusions: radical prostatectomy continues to be considered one of the treatments of choice for organ-confined prostate cancer. The main cause of the presence of erectile dysfunction is attributed to the surgical procedure; advanced age can contribute to a worse prognosis and adjuvant diseases. The results in the sexual sphere of laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and open radical prostatectomy are heterogeneous compared with the international bibliography.

Cytoreductive surgery in patients with oligometastatic prostate cancer. Systematic review of the scientific literature.

INTRODUCTION: Interest in oligometastatic prostate cancer has spiked due to the emergence of new evidence regarding more specific and accurate imaging, and the wider use of minimally invasive techniques. Nevertheless, the optimal management of this pathology is yet to be determined. OBJECTIVE: Assess the efficacy and safety of cytoreductive surgery in patients suffering from oligometastatic prostate cancer. EVIDENCE GATHERING: Systematic review of the scientific literature (01/01/2010-31/12/2021) within the MedLine, Embase, Cochrane Library, Cinahl, Scopus, Spanish Healthcare Technology Assessment Agencies (AETS, Agencias de Evaluación de Tecnologías Sanitarias) and ClinicalTrials.gov databases. The keywords used were prostatectomy, prostatic neoplasm, radical prostatectomy; the free search terms were prostatectomy and oligometastatic prostate. The inclusion criteria comprised studies on patients with oligometastatic prostate cancer who had been operated on using radical cytoreductive prostatectomy. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: The systematic review included 4 observational studies, 2 clinical trials, and 2 case series, of moderate quality. The results observed suggest that oligometastatic prostate cancer patients who had undergone cytoreductive prostate surgery obtained a benefit in terms of efficacy. Conversely, the majority of these studies showed a reduction in the number of localized complications, when compared to the best systemic treatments. CONCLUSIONS: Cytoreductive surgery in this group of patients is a safe procedure that reduces the incidence of localized complications and that presents promising results with regard to survival rates. To date, the lack of prospective trials limits the use of this therapeutic option to experimental environments.

Identifying prognostic parameters related to surgical technique in patients treated by robotic radical prostatectomy.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE: The most frequently studied factors in patients treated by robotic radical prostatectomy are PSA and pathological features of the biopsy and prostatectomy specimen. Studies on the factors associated with the surgical technique are scarce and with controversial results. The objective is to identify all possible surgical factors and their relationship with disease-free and metastasis-free survival. PATIENTS AND METHOD: Prospective study approved by the Ethics Committee, including patients who underwent robotic radical prostatectomy since January 2009 with a minimum follow-up of 5 years. Surgeon, surgical time, blood loss, fascial access, continence techniques, preservation of the fascia, neurovascular bundles, bladder neck, urethra, learning curve and surgical complications, were analyzed as possible prognostic factors. We performed univariate and matched comparisons of survival using Kaplan-Meier estimation and long-rank tests. The significance level for multiple comparisons was established with False Discovery Rate-adjustment (adjusted p). RESULTS: Cohort of 667 patients with a median follow-up of 69 months. In univariate analysis, surgeon (adjp=0.018), preservation of puboprostatic ligaments (adjp=0.02), preservation of endopelvic fascia (adjp=0.001) and performing periurethral suspension (adjp<0.001) are poor prognostic factors for disease-free survival. Fascia preservation also negatively affects metastasis-free survival (adjp=0.04). Previous abdominal surgeries, prostate, surgical time, blood loss, type of residual urethra, middle lobe, fascial access, fascia or bladder neck preservation, have no statistical significance. CONCLUSIONS: The surgeon and specific aspects of the surgical technique are determining factors in disease-free survival. Preservation of the fascia is the only factor that negatively affects metastasis-free survival.

Open retropubic radical prostatectomy: Still a well-established surgical technique for prostate cancer management.

INTRODUCTION: The surgical treatment options for prostate cancer have changed rapidly, given the expansion of robotics. However, open retropubic radical prostatectomy (ORP) will continue to be performed in areas with financial limitations or with limited access to robotics. The purpose of this study was to determine the long-term oncological outcomes, to categorize complication rates and to examine the early continence rates in patients treated with ORP. METHODS: We identified all patients who underwent ORP at our institution between 2000 and 2020. A standardized pad test was used to determine the early continence rates upon catheter removal, the late continence around a year after surgery was determined by the number of pads per day. The Clavien-Dindo classification was used to report the complication rates. The biochemical recurrence (BCR)-free survival and overall survival (OS) rates were defined using the Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank analysis. Multivariable Cox-regression models were used to test the effect of different factors on biochemical recurrence. RESULTS: We analyzed 1095 patients. The median follow-up was 93.4 months. An overall 10-year BCR-free survival and OS of 73% and 82% respectively was found. A complication rate for Clavien Dindo≥3 was seen in 4.8% of patients. The early continence rate was 81.4% and the late continence 89,1%. Preoperative PSA level, Gleason score sum, pT stage, lymph node status, and surgical margin status were independent predictors of BCR (p<0.001, 95% CI). Limitations include retrospective and single center study design. CONCLUSIONS: ORP is a surgical procedure that provides excellent oncological- and early continence-rates.

Population based study of morbidity and mortality rates associated to radical prostatectomy cases in Spain.

INTRODUCTION: There is no population-based study that accounts for the number of radical prostatectomies (RP) carried out in Spain, nor regarding the morbidity and mortality of this intervention. Our objective is to study the morbidity and mortality of RP in Spain from 2011 to 2015 and to evaluate the geographic variation. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We designed a retrospective observational study of all patients submitted to RP in Spain during five consecutive years (2011-2015). The data was extracted from the «Conjunto Mínimo Básico de Datos¼ (CMBD). We have evaluated geographic variations in terms of morbidity and hospital stay, and the impact of the mean annual surgical volume for each center on these variables. RESULTS: Between 2011-2015, a total of 37,725 RPs were performed in 221 Spanish public hospitals. The mean age of the series was 63.9±3.23 years. Of all RPs, 50% were performed through an open approach, and 43.4% have been operated on in hospitals with <500 beds. We observed an important variability in the distribution of the cases operated on in the different regions. The regions that perform more RPs are Andalusia, Catalonia, Galicia, and Madrid. Our study shows a complication rate of 8.6%, with hemorrhage and the need for transfusion being the most frequent (5.3 and 4%, respectively). There are significant differences in bleeding rates and hospital stay among regions, which are maintained after adjusting for patient characteristics and type of hospital. When studying the annual surgical volume of each hospital, we find that the impact on the rate of hemorrhage or transfusion is linear; however, hospital stay remains stable at around 5 days from 60 RPs/year. CONCLUSIONS: In national terms, morbidity and mortality rates after RP are comparable to those described in the literature. This study reveals a clear dispersion in the hospitals that carry out this intervention, showing clear differences in terms of morbidity and hospital stay between the different regions.

The impact of psychiatric pathology on the prognosis and survival of men with prostate cancer undergoing radical prostatectomy.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE: Cancer-specific anxiety is the most frequently reported psychological response after radical prostatectomy (RP). We evaluated the prevalence of pretreatment psychiatric pathology in patients with prostate cancer undergoing RP and identified the effects of psychiatric diagnoses on their survival and prognosis. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Retrospective multicenter observational study including 1078 men treated with RP for organ-confined prostate cancer. Groups: GP: patients with psychiatric pathology prior to RP; GNP: patients without psychiatric pathology prior to RP. Urological, oncological and psychiatric variables, descriptive statistics and multivariate analysis were included. RESULTS: 37.94% of patients presented a psychiatric diagnosis. Adjuvant radiotherapy was required in 27.83% and hormone therapy in 23.38%; being more frequent in GP. Cancer-specific survival was higher in GNP. Anxiety, depression, insomnia, smoking, psychosis and alcoholism were the most frequent. Low TNM and low presence of LUTS and SUI increased the probability of absence of psychiatric pathology. Fatigue, erectile dysfunction and cognitive impairment after RP with RT and/or HT were higher in GP. Older age and higher PSA at diagnosis increased the relative risk of psychiatric pathology and worse outcome. The most frequently related factors were RP, PSA, age and survival time. CONCLUSIONS: Psychiatric pathology is present in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer, with a high impact on survival and prognostic outcomes.

Oncological and functional results after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy in high-risk prostate cancer patients.

BACKGROUND: Pentafecta is currently the standard in the comprehensive evaluation of patients undergoing radical prostatectomy, the objective of this study is the evaluation of oncological and functional outcomes in patients with prostate cancer of high risk undergoing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. METHOD: Descriptive, retrospective study of 20 cases with a diagnosis of high-risk prostate cancer. The high-risk group is composed of a prostate-specific antigen equal or greater than 20 ng/mL, Gleason score equal or greater than 8, or clinical stages T2/T3 treated with robotic approach. RESULTS: Biochemical control was achieved from the first six weeks after the surgical event. 75% (n = 15) had negative surgical margins. 100% of the patients (n = 20) presented urinary continence immediately after removal of the urinary catheter. Erectile function was preserved at 3, 6 and 12 months in 100% of the patients who underwent neuropreservation but with use of an PDE inhibitor. (n = 5). Complications were reported in 10% (Clavien-Dindo I-II). CONCLUSIONS: Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy in patients with high-risk prostate cancer is considered an appropriate treatment option in selected patients. A different experimental design is needed to define the advantages or disadvantages of this approach, as well as to determine its role and application in clinical practice.

ANTECEDENTES: Pentafecta es el estándar en la evaluación integral de los pacientes sometidos a prostatectomía radical. El objetivo de este estudio es evaluar y describir los desenlaces oncológicos y funcionales en pacientes con cáncer de próstata de alto riesgo sometidos a prostatectomía radical asistida por robot. MÉTODO: Estudio descriptivo, retrospectivo, de 20 pacientes con diagnóstico de cáncer de próstata de alto riesgo. El grupo de alto riesgo se compone por pacientes con antígeno prostático específico mayo o igual a 20 ng/ml, reporte histopatológico con Gleason mayor o igual a 8 y/o estadios clínicos T2/T3 tratados con abordaje robótico. RESULTADOS: El control bioquímico se alcanzó a partir de las primeras 6 semanas posterior al evento quirúrgico. El 75% (n = 15) presentaron márgenes quirúrgicos negativos. El 100% de los pacientes (n = 20) presentaron continencia urinaria inmediatamente después del retiro de la sonda vesical. La función eréctil se conservó a 3, 6 y 12 meses en el 100% de los pacientes a los que se realizó neuropreservación, pero con uso de inhibidor de la fosfodiesterasa (n = 5). Se reportaron complicaciones en el 10% de los casos (Clavien-Dindo I-II). CONCLUSIONES: La prostatectomía radical asistida por robot en pacientes con cáncer de próstata de alto riesgo se considera una opción de tratamiento adecuada en casos seleccionados. Se necesita un diseño experimental distinto para definir las ventajas o desventajas de este abordaje, así como determinar su papel y aplicación en la práctica clínica.

The role of multiparametric mri in the diagnosis of local recurrence after radical prostatectomy and before salvage radiotherapy.

PURPOSE: Assess multiparametric-MRI (mp-MRI) diagnostic accuracy in the detection of local recurrence of Prostate Cancer (PCa) after Radical Prostatectomy (PR) and before Radiation Therapy (RT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 188 patients underwent 1.5-T mp-MRI after RP before RT. Patients were divided into two groups: with biochemical recurrence (group A) and without but with high risk of local recurrence (group B). Continuous variables were compared between two groups using T-Student; categoric variables were analyzed using Pearson chi-square. ROC analysis was performed considering PSA before RT, ISUP, pT and pN as grouping variables. RESULTS: PCa recurrence (reduction of PSA levels after RT) was 89.8% in the group A and 80.3% in the group B. Comparing patients with and without PCa recurrence, there was a significant difference in PSA values before RT for group A and for PSA values before RT and after RT for group B. In group A, there was a significant correlation between PSA before RT and diameter of recurrence and between PSA before RT and time spent before recurrence. The mp-MRI diagnostic accuracy in detecting PCa local recurrence after RP is of 62.2% in group A and 38% in group B. DWI is the most specific MRI-sequence and DCE the most sensitive. For PSA = 0.5 ng/ml, the AUC decreases while sensitivity and accuracy increase for each MRI-sequence. For PSA = 0.9 ng/ml, DCE-AUC increases significantly. CONCLUSION: mp-MRI should always be performed before RT when a recurrence is suspected. New scenarios can be opened considering the role of DWI for PSA ≤ 0.5 ng/ml.

Continence definition and prognostic factors for early urinary continence recovery in posterior rhabdosphincter reconstruction after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Post-hoc analysis of a randomised controlled trial.

INTRODUCTION: Urinary incontinence after radical prostatectomy (RP) is an adverse event with high impact on patient's quality of life. Nowadays there is no standardized method for urinary continence measurement. Posterior rhabdosphincter reconstruction (PRR) is a surgical step that can improve early urinary continence after RP. Our objective was to analyse different continence definitions and predictors of urinary continence recovery after robot-assisted RP (RARP). MATERIAL AND METHODS: We conducted a double-blind, randomised controlled trial (NCT03302169) including 152 consecutive patients with localized prostate cancer subjected to RARP. Patients were randomised to single urethrovesical anastomosis (control arm) or PRR before urethrovesical anastomosis (PRR arm). Urinary continence was measured with the EPIC-26 and ICIQ-SF validated questionnaires, and pad use (0-1 pads and no pads), at 7, 15, 30, 90, 180 and 365 days after catheter removal. Prognostic factors for early urinary continence recovery were analysed. RESULTS: 72 patients were included in the control arm and 80 in the PRR arm. Baseline characteristics were similar between arms, except body mass index, which was higher in PRR arm. "No pad" was the only definition assessing the benefit of PRR at 30 days, 33.8% in PRR arm and 18.1% in control arm, p = 0.022; and at 90 days, 58.8 and 43.1% respectively, p = 0.038. Questionnaires did not detect differences in terms of continence recovery. PRR was the only predictor for early continence recovery, p = 0.03. CONCLUSIONS: PRR increased early urinary continence recovery after RARP. Continence definition was critical to assess benefit. The only predictive factor for early continence recovery was PRR.

Impact of a radical prostatectomy on the urodynamic results of prostate cancer patients treated with intensity modulated radiation therapy.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effect of radical prostatectomy and age on urodynamics before and after intensity-modulated radiation therapy administered to prostate cancer patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The sample consisted of 40 prostate cancer patients, 22 of whom had undergone a radical prostatectomy. Urodynamic parameters before and after an average of 4.2 months of radiotherapy were measured and compared. External radiotherapy was administered via Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT), Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy (IMRT) techniques. RESULTS: Uroflowmetry presented no significant parameters. In the case of Cystomanometry, the data did not show an increase in secondary stress urinary incontinence, although there is 7 percent increase in urge urinary incontinence. There were statistically significant changes in reduced bladder capacity with a strong desire to void, with an urge to void and also in the detrusor pressure with a normal desire to void. Furthermore, pressure/flow analysis revealed a statistically significant reduction of residual urine volume. CONCLUSIONS: The effect of prostatectomy and age varies according to the evolution of urodynamics. There was a significant reduction in terms of residual urine volume and detrusor pressure with a normal desire to void in patients without a prostatectomy and in those under 75 years old. In addition to an increase in urge incontinence, there was also a significant worsening of the bladder filling urodynamics and a decrease in the cystomanometric bladder capacity with a strong desire and an urge to void. None of these were modified by age or prostatectomy.

Long term erectile function results of radical perineal prostatectomy.

INTRODUCTION: Although many patients are being treated by radical prostatectomy (RP), there is still insufficient information about the changes in long-term erectile function after RP. Our aim is to examine long term, up to 5 year erectile function status of patients after Radical Perineal Prostatectomy (RPP). MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred and thirty-two patients, who underwent bilateral nerve-sparing Radical Perineal Prostatectomy (RPP) in between January 2012 and January 2017, with preoperative age≤70, prostate volume<80g, transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) guided biopsy Gleason score (GS)<7, prostate specific antigen (PSA) value<10ng/mL, and cT stage≤2 (N0, M0) were included into this study. Exclusion criteria were previous cardiovascular diseases, serious chronic renal and/or hepatic insufficiency, neurological diseases, uncontrolled diabetes mellitus, and severe lung diseases. Patients who received additional treatment (hormonal and/or radiotherapy) after RPP were also excluded from the study group. Erectile function was evaluated before surgery and at postoperative 3rd, 12th, and 60th months. Patients with an "International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) - 5" score of ≥21 and patients whose IIEF-5 scores were between 16 and 20 but responded as "yes" to the "Sexual Encounter Profile (SEP) - 2" and "SEP-3" questions were accepted as having normal erectile function. RESULTS: Out of the 132 patients, 96 (72.7%) of the patients were found to be potent in the first postoperative year. A total of 118 patients were evaluated at the end of 5 years. Eighty seven (73.7%) patients had normal erectile function according to our criteria. DISCUSSION: According to the results of our study, short term and long term erectile function outcomes of patients undergoing RPP were favorable and there was no statistically significant difference between short and long term results.

Comparison of surgical approaches to radical prostatectomy in our series beyond oncological and functional outcomes.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the outcomes of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) compared to those of open (ORP) and laparoscopic (LRP) surgery. The interest lies fundamentally in the quality-of-life (QoL) evaluation, postoperative recovery, and personal satisfaction of patients with the intervention (PS) beyond oncological and functional outcomes. METHODS: Six hundred eighty-five RPs were performed in our center between 2011-2018 (17,8% ORP, 22,2% LRP and 60% RARP). Patients were prospectively assessed through follow-up until April 2020 and a multiple questionnaire at 12-months post-RP that included ICIQ-SF, SHIM, IPSS, IQL and questions about pain, postoperative recovery and PS. Also baseline and postoperative patient- and treatment-related data were collected, and binomial logistic regressions were performed for the 1 vs.1 comparisons (ORP vs. RARP and LRP vs. RARP). RESULTS: RARP patients have overall fewer comorbidities, less tumor aggressiveness, more operative time requirements and more positive surgical margins than ORP and LRP patients. Nevertheless, RARP outperforms ORP in: hospital stay (days) (OR 0,86; 95% CI: 0,80-0,94), hemoglobin loss (OR 0,38; 95% CI: 0,30-0,47), transfusion rate (OR 0,18; 95% CI: 0,09-0,34), early complications (p = 0,001), IQL (OR 0,82; 95% CI: 0,69-0,98), erectile function (OR 0,41; 95% CI: 0,21-0,79), pain control (OR 0,82; 95% CI: 0,75-0,89), postoperative recovery (p < 0,001) and choice of a different approach (OR 5,55; 95% CI: 3,14-9,80). RARP is superior to LRP in: urinary continence (OR 0,55; 95% CI: 0,37-0,82), IPSS (OR 0,96; 95% CI: 0,93-0,98), IQL (OR 0,76; 95% CI: 0,66-0,88), erectile function (OR 0,52; 95% CI: 0,29-0,93), postoperative recovery (p = 0,02 and 0,004), PS (p = 0,005; 0,002; and 0,03) and choice of a different approach (OR 7,79; 95% CI: 4,63-13,13). CONCLUSIONS: The findings of our study globally endorse a positive effectiveness of RARP over ORP and/or LRP, both on functional issues, postoperative recovery, QoL and PS. Oncologic results should still be improved.

The association between perineural invasion in mpMRI-targeted and/or systematic prostate biopsy and adverse pathological outcomes in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: This study aims to investigate the relationship between perineural invasion (PNI) in targeted (TBx) and/or systematic (SBx) prostate needle biopsy and adverse pathological features of prostate cancer (PCa) in prostatectomy specimens. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 95 male patients who underwent transperineal TBx and/or concomitant SBx subsequently treated with robot-assisted radical prostatectomy for PCa between October 2015 and June 2020 were included. The performance of PNI as a classification test (sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values) and its correlation with clinically significant PCa, surgical margin positivity, extraprostatic extension, and seminal vesicle invasion in prostatectomy were computed. RESULTS: The median age of the patients was 65 (60-70) years. TBx and concomitant SBx were performed in 78 (82.1%) patients, while 16 (16.8%) patients underwent SBx alone and one (1.1%) patient underwent TBx alone. The frequency of PNI in TBx and SBx was 17 (21.5%) and 32 (34.0%), respectively. The specificity/negative predictive values of PNI for surgical margin positivity, extraprostatic extension, and seminal vesicle invasion were 79.7/88.7%, 92.5/79.0%, and 83.3/96.8%, in TBx, and 71.1/87.1%, 80.7/74.2%, and 69.5/91.9%, in SBx, respectively. There was also a statistically significant correlation between PNI in biopsy and surgical margin positivity, extraprostatic extension, and seminal vesicle invasion in prostatectomy as well as the ISUP grade group and pT stage. CONCLUSIONS: The absence of PNI in prostate needle biopsy may predict localized PCa with a pT stage ≤ 2c and negative surgical margins in contrast to its presence which appears to be an indicator of unfavorable factors in final pathology.

[Predictors of biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy at an oncology reference center in Colombia.] / Factores predictores de recaída bioquímica después de prostatectomía radical en un centro oncológico colombiano.

OBJECTIVE: To determine predictors of BCR in patients with localized PCa undergoing RP at an oncology reference center in Colombia. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective analytical study was conducted on patients with localized PCa undergoing RP and who at least had one adverse pathological factor for BCR. We consider BCR as two consecutive elevations of PSA after RP, greater than 0.2 ng/ml. For the bivariate analysis we used Kaplan-Meier, and Cox proportional risk analysis to estimate the hazard ratio as well as to determine variables independently associated with the outcome. RESULTS: 280 patients were included. The medianage was 65.3 years, with a median follow up of 52.2 months. BCR occurred in 39% of patients, with a median BCR time of 24.8 months. In the multivariate analysis, high risk [HR 2.07 (95% CI 1.11 - 3.86)], positive surgical margins [HR 2.79 (95% CI 1.66 - 4.69)] and tertiary Gleason pattern [HR 2.16 (95% CI 1.16 - 4.01)] were identified as independent variables associated significantly with BCR. Limitations include retrospective design and sample size. CONCLUSIONS: High risk, positive surgical margins and the presence of tertiary Gleason pattern are the predictive factors of BCR after RP in the Colombian population.

OBJETIVO: Determinar los predictores de recaída bioquímica en pacientes con cáncer de próstata localizado llevados a prostatectomía radical en un centro oncológico de referencia en Colombia.MATERIALES Y MÉTODOS: Se realizó un estudio retrospectivo analítico en pacientes con cáncer de próstata localizado que fueron llevados a prostatectomía radical y que tuvieran al menos un factor patológico adverso para recaída bioquímica. Las variables analizadas fueron la edad, el riesgo, el estadio pT, el estadio pN, la densidad ganglionar, los márgenes quirúrgicos, el grupo grado de Gleason y el patrón terciario del Gleason. Consideramos recaída bioquímica como 2 elevaciones consecutivas del PSA después de la prostatectomía radical, mayor a 0,2 ng/ml. Para el análisis bivariado usamos Kaplan-Meier y el análisis de riesgo proporcional de Cox para estimar el HR así como para determinarlas variables independientemente asociadas con el desenlace. RESULTADOS: Se incluyeron 280 pacientes. La edad promedio fue de 65,3 años, con una media de seguimiento de 52,2 meses. La recaída bioquímica ocurrió en el 39% de los pacientes, con una media de tiempo hasta la recaída bioquímica de 24,8 meses. En el análisis multivariado, el riesgo alto [HR 2,07 (IC95% 1,11­ 3,86)], los márgenes quirúrgicos positivos [HR 2,79 (IC95% 1,66 ­ 4,69)] y el patrón terciario del Gleason [HR 2,16 (IC 95% 1,16 ­ 4,01)] fueron identificados como variables independientes asociadas significativamente con recaída bioquímica. Las limitaciones incluyen el diseño retrospectivo del estudio y el tamaño de la muestra. CONCLUSIONES: El riesgo alto, los márgenes quirúrgicos positivos y la presencia de patrón terciario de Gleason son las variables predictoras de recaída bioquímica después de prostatectomía radical en la población colombiana.

Recurrence rate of localized prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy according to D'amico risk classification in a tertiary referral hospital: association study.

OBJETIVO: Determinar la tasa de recurrencia del cáncer de próstata localizado después de la prostatectomía radical según la clasificación D'Amico. MÉTODOS: Estudio de cohorte retrospectivo comparativo de 5 años. Se obtuvieron datos de registros clínicos de pacientes con cáncer de próstata localizado, que se sometieron a prostatectomía radical y se evaluó la tasa de recurrencia de la enfermedad. Se analizó con pruebas estadísticas descriptivas y comparativas. Una p < 0.05 se consideró significativo. RESULTADOS: Se analizó 108 pacientes, la edad promedio 65.3 años. Acerca de la clasificación de riesgo de D'Amico, 33.33% de bajo riesgo, 55.56% riesgo intermedio y 11.11% alto riesgo. La tasa de recurrencia de APE fue 14,81%. Los pacientes de bajo riesgo tuvieron recurrencia del 13.89%, riesgo intermedio 18.33% y alto riesgo no tuvieron recurrencia. Sobre piezas quirúrgicas, el 25.93% presentaron características adversas. La escala de Gleason postoperatoria muestra un aumento de 44.44% en bajo riesgo, 26.67% en riesgo intermedio y 41.67% en alto riesgo. CONCLUSIONES: La prostatectomía radical ofrece un control adecuado del cáncer de próstata localizado. La tasa de recurrencia del APE fue menor que otros informes internacionales. Asimismo, la recurrencia bioquímica del riesgo bajo, intermedio y alto fue similar a la tendencia global. OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to determine the recurrence rate of localized prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy according to the D'Amico classification. METHODS: This was a observational and 5-year comparative retrospective cohort study. Data were obtained from clinical records of patients with localized prostate cancer who underwent radical prostatectomy and the recurrence rate of the disease was evaluated. It was analyzed with descriptive and comparative statistical tests, p<0.05 was considered significant. RESULTS: One hundred and eight patients were analyzed, and the average age was 65.3 years. About D'Amico's risk classification, 33.33% low risk, 55.56% intermediate risk, and 11.11% high risk. The prostate-specific antigen (PSA) recurrence rate was 14.81%. Low-risk patients had recurrence of 13.89%, intermediate risk 18.33%, and high risk had no recurrence. Regarding surgical pieces, 25.93% presented adverse characteristics. The post-operative Gleason scale shows an increase of 44.44% in low risk, 26.67% in intermediate risk, and 41.67% in high risk. CONCLUSIONS: Radical prostatectomy offers adequate control of localized prostate cancer. The PSA recurrence rate was lower than other international reports. Likewise, the biochemical recurrence of low, intermediate, and high risk was similar to the global trend.

Is neutrophile to lymphocyte ratio a predictor of Gleason score upgrading according to risk classifications in patients with prostate cancer.

OBJECTIVES: We aimed to determine the parameters that predict Gleason Score (GS) upgrading in patients undergoing robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RARP) and especially the ability of neutrophile to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) in predicting the upgrading. METHODS: Patients who underwent RARP for prostate cancer in our clinic between January 2013 and January 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. Patients' demographic data, preoperative and postoperative parameters were all recorded in the database. NLR was calculated by dividing the absolute neutrophil count (NC) by the absolute lymphocyte count (LC). Patients were classified as low, moderate and high risk according to the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCNN) Guidelines. Any increase in GS between biopsy results and radical prostatectomy specimens were consideredas an GS upgrading. RESULTS: After applying the inclusion and exclusion criteria, a total of 571 patients, 205 patients without GS upgrading (Group 1) and 366 patients with GS upgrading (Group 2), were included. The mean preoperative PSA values and prostate volumes were 10.8 ± 8 ng/dL and 45 ± 18.8 ml, respectively. Group 2 had a significantly high NC and NLR, significantly low platelet count (PC) and LC, (p=0.0001, 0.0001, 0.001 and0.002, respectively). Group 2 was found to have significantly higher positive surgical margin (PSM), extraprostatic extension (EPE) and seminal vesical invasion (SVI) (p<0.001). There was no significant correlation between the parameters of NLR and PSM, EPE, SVI, and lymph node invasion (LNI). Binomial logistic regression showed patients with increased NLR had 1.68 times higher odds to exhibit an upgrade in GS in the post-surgical histopathological analysis. CONCLUSIONS: NLR calculated preoperatively is an easy diagnostic method that can predict GS upgrading in patients scheduled for radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer.

OBJETIVOS: Determinamos los parámetros que predicen el grado de sobregradación de Gleason en pacientes que recibieron prostatectomía radical robótica asistida por laparoscopia (PRRL) y especialmente la habilidad de la tasa de neutrófilos/linfocitos (NLR) a la hora de predecir la sobregradación.MÉTODOS: Los pacientes que recibieron PRRL por cáncer de próstata en nuestra clínica entre enero 2013 y enero de 2018 se analizaron retrospectivamente. Los datos demográficos, parámetros preoperatorios y postoperatorios fueron reportados en la base de datos. NLR se calculo dividiendo el numero absoluto de neutrófilos (NC) por el numero absoluto de linfocitos (LC). Los pacientes se clasificaron como bajo, moderado y alto riesgo en la relación a las guías de National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCNN). Cualquier aumento en el grado de Gleason entre los resultados de la biopsia y la prostatectomía radical fueron considerados como una sobregradación de grado deGleason. RESULTADOS: Después de aplicar los criterios de inclusión y exclusión, un total de 571 pacientes, 205 sin sobregradación de Gleason (Grupo 1) y 366 pacientes con sobregradación de Gleason (Grupo 2). La media de PSA preoperatorio y volúmenes prostáticos fueron de 10,8 ± 8 ng/dL y 45 ± 18,8 ml, respectivamente. El grupo 2 presentó un NC y NLR más alto, significativamente, bajos niveles de plaquetas y LC (p=0,0001, 0,0001, 0,001 y 0,002, respectivamente). El grupo 2 demostró tener niveles significativamente más altos de márgenes quirúrgicos (PSM), extensión extraprostatica (EPE) e invasión de vesículas seminales (SVI) (p<0,001). No se econtró una correlación significativa entre los parámetros de NLR y PSM, EPE, SVI, invasión ganglios linfáticos. El modelo de regresión binomial logística demostró que los pacientes con un incremento de NLR tuvieron 1,68 más veces de tener una sobregradación de Gleason en el análisis histopatológico postquirúrgico. CONCLUSIONES: El cálculo de NLR preoperatorio es un método fácil de diagnóstico que puede predecir la sobregradación de Gleason en pacientes que van a recibir una prostatectomía radical por cáncer de próstata.

Treatment for rectourethral fistulas after radical prostatectomy with biological material interposition through a perineal access.

INTRODUCTION: Rectal injury is a rare complication after extraperitoneal laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. The development of rectourethral fistulas (URF) from rectal injuries is one of the most feared and of more complex resolution in urology. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Between 2013 and 2020 we have operated on a total of 5 patients with URF after extraperitoneal endoscopic radical prostatectomy through a perineal access using the interposition of biological material. All fistulas had a diameter of less than 6 mm at endoscopy and were less than 6 cm apart from the anal margin. RESULTS: The mean age of the patients was 64 years old. All patients had a previous bowel and urinary diversion for at least 3 months. Under general anesthesia and with the patient in a forced lithotomy position, fistulorraphy and interposition of biological material of porcine origin (lyophilized porcine dermis [Permacol®]) were performed through a perineal access. Mean operative time was 174 min (140-210). Most patients were discharged on the third postoperative day. The bladder catheter was left in place for a mean of 40 days (30-60). Prior to its removal, cystography and a Gastrografin® barium enema were performed, showing resolution of the fistula in all cases. CONCLUSIONS: The interposition of biological material from porcine dermis through perineal approach is a safe alternative with good results in patients submitted to urethrorectal fistulorraphy after radical prostatectomy.