RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Resection of colorectal liver metastasis has emerged as the standard treatment. Our study compares oncological outcomes of patients with resected synchronous bilobar versus unilobar colorectal liver metastasis. METHODS: This retrospective study presents long-term follow-up data of 105 consecutive patients with primary colorectal cancer and synchronous liver metastasis. All patients underwent primary tumor and metastasis resections between 2007 and 2019. RESULTS: Fifty-five patients with bilobar and 50 patients with unilobar colorectal liver metastases were included. No significant difference in overall, tumor-specific, or recurrence-free survival was observed between patients with bilobar and unilobar metastases. After case-control matching, the results were confirmed in patients with similar tumor burdens. In the multivariate analysis, chemotherapy following liver metastasis resection was a significant prognostic factor associated with improved overall survival (hazard ratio 0.518, 95% confidence interval: 0.302-0.888, p = 0.017). CONCLUSION: Overall survival, as well as tumor-specific and recurrence-free survival, did not differ between patients with unilobar and bilobar liver metastasis. These findings contribute to the understanding that primary tumor and metastasis resection in eligible patients improve long-term outcomes.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: High dose unilobar radioembolization (also termed 'radiation lobectomy')-the transarterial unilobar infusion of radioactive microspheres as a means of controlling tumour growth while concomitantly inducing future liver remnant hypertrophy-has recently gained interest as induction strategy for surgical resection. Prospective studies on the safety and efficacy of the unilobar radioembolization-surgery treatment algorithm are lacking. The RALLY study aims to assess the safety and toxicity profile of holmium-166 unilobar radioembolization in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma ineligible for surgery due to insufficiency of the future liver remnant. METHODS: The RALLY study is a multicenter, interventional, non-randomized, open-label, non-comparative safety study. Patients with hepatocellular carcinoma who are considered ineligible for surgery due to insufficiency of the future liver remnant (< 2.7%/min/m2 on hepatobiliary iminodiacetic acid scan will be included. A classical 3 + 3 dose escalation model will be used, enrolling three to six patients in each cohort. The primary objective is to determine the maximum tolerated treated non-tumourous liver-absorbed dose (cohorts of 50, 60, 70 and 80 Gy). Secondary objectives are to evaluate dose-response relationships, to establish the safety and feasibility of surgical resection following unilobar radioembolization, to assess quality of life, and to generate a biobank. DISCUSSION: This will be the first clinical study to assess the unilobar radioembolization-surgery treatment algorithm and may serve as a stepping stone towards its implementation in routine clinical practice. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Netherlands Trial Register NL8902 , registered on 2020-09-15.
Asunto(s)
Carcinoma Hepatocelular , Neoplasias Hepáticas , Humanos , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/radioterapia , Microesferas , Estudios Prospectivos , Calidad de Vida , Neoplasias Hepáticas/radioterapia , Hepatomegalia , Estudios Multicéntricos como AsuntoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: We aimed to determine how cognitive impairment relates to the extent of the presumed epileptogenic zone in pediatric focal epilepsies. We analyzed the cognitive functions in unilobar compared to multilobar focal epilepsy patients that underwent neuropsychological testing at a tertiary epilepsy center. METHODS: We assessed cognitive functions of pediatric focal epilepsy patients with the German version of the Wechsler Intelligence Scales that measures full-scale IQ and subcategories. We assessed differences in IQ and epilepsy-related variables between unilobar and multilobar epilepsy patients. RESULTS: We included 62 patients (37 unilobar, 25 multilobar), aged 10.6 ± 3.7 years. Full-scale IQ values were significantly higher in unilobar (93.6 ± 17.7, 95% CI 87.7-99.6) than in multilobar epilepsy patients (77.3 ± 17.2, 95% CI 69.3-85.0; p = 0.001). In all but one IQ subcategory (working memory), significantly higher values were measured in unilobar than in multilobar epilepsy patients. The proportion of unilobar epilepsy patients with severe cognitive impairment (8.3%) and below-average intelligence (30.5%) was lower compared to multilobar epilepsy patients (47.6% and 61.9%; p = 0.002 and p = 0.021, respectively). Epilepsy onset occurred earlier in multilobar (4.0 years, 95% CI 2.6-5.5, SD ± 3.4 years) than in unilobar epilepsy patients (7.0 years, 95% CI 5.5-8.5, SD ± 4.4 years, p = 0.008). CONCLUSIONS: Pediatric multilobar epilepsy patients face more cognitive issues than unilobar epilepsy patients on average. Our findings should help to identify children and adolescents who are most at risk for impaired cognitive development. A limitation of our study is the simple division into unilobar and multilobar epilepsies, with no specific account being taken of etiology/epilepsy syndrome, which can have a profound effect on cognition.
Asunto(s)
Epilepsias Parciales , Epilepsia , Adolescente , Niño , Humanos , Epilepsia/psicología , Epilepsias Parciales/diagnóstico , Epilepsias Parciales/psicología , Inteligencia , Pruebas Neuropsicológicas , CogniciónRESUMEN
Lung isolation using one-lung ventilation is common during thoracic surgery procedures, as it allows proper visualisation and manipulation of the lung to be operated on. Selective lobar blockade has been described in patients that do not tolerate one-lung ventilation, and is usually achieved using endobronchial blockers. However, it depends on endobronchial blocker availability, its complexity regarding proper positioning, and the need for constant monitoring to ensure the correct placement of the bronchial seal. In the clinical case to be described, a new method was used to increase the available surface for oxygen exchange. This was accomplished by means of direct supply of oxygen through the bronchoscope's working channel to one of the not-to-be operated-on, non-ventilated lung lobes. With this technique, the surgeon had an optimal operating field, oxygenation from one-lung ventilation improved and no perioperative complications were found.