Risk of appendiceal neoplasm in patients with appendix disorders.

The most common appendicular disease is acute appendicitis, with a lifetime risk of 7%-8%. Complicated cases, which can occur in 2%-7% of patients, can significantly impact the severity of the condition and may require different management approaches. Nonoperative management with possible delayed appendectomy has been suggested for selected patients, however, there is a non-negligible risk of missing an underlying malignancy, which is reported to be as high as 11%. Diagnostic work-up is paramount to achieve optimal treatment with good results.

Appendicular diverticulosis complicated by acute appendicitis and organizing abscess: what does the surgeon need to consider intraoperatively?

Acute appendicitis is a common surgical emergency, affecting 7%-10% of people worldwide, whereas appendicular diverticulosis is rare, occurring in 0.004%-2.1% of appendectomy cases and often mimicking appendicitis symptoms. A 35-year-old male presented with right lower quadrant pain, nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea. Clinical examination showed tenderness in the right iliac fossa. Imaging suggested uncomplicated acute appendicitis, but surgery revealed an appendiceal mass suspected to be a carcinoid tumor. Histopathology post-appendectomy diagnosed appendicular diverticulosis complicated by acute appendicitis. This case emphasizes the need for thorough histopathological examination in appendectomy cases to accurately diagnose and differentiate appendicular conditions. Appendiceal diverticulitis should be considered in the differential diagnosis of right lower quadrant pain to ensure proper surgical intervention and prevent complications.

A Case of Amyand's Hernia With Abscess Managed by Two-Stage Surgery: Elective Hernia Mesh Repair Following Emergency Laparoscopic Appendectomy.

An 82-year-old man presented to our emergency department with a bulge in the right groin and worsening pain that had been present for one week. An abdominal computed tomography scan revealed fluid collection within a right inguinal hernia and a thickened appendix within the hernia sac. The patient underwent an emergency laparoscopic appendectomy under a diagnosis of Amyand's hernia with peri-appendicular abscess. During surgery, the incarcerated appendix was pulled back into the abdominal cavity from the hernia sac, and the perforated appendix was resected. For drainage of the abscess, a drain tube was laparoscopically placed into the hernia sac through the internal inguinal ring. Considering the risk of mesh infection and wound infection, the patient underwent appendectomy alone but not hernia repair at this time. Two months later, Lichtenstein repair using mesh was performed as a second-stage procedure. For Amyand's hernia with abscess, this type of two-stage strategy may avoid the surgical site infection, and the use of mesh in a second procedure would minimize the possibility of hernia recurrence, unlike previously reported cases treated by concomitant appendectomy and hernia repair.

Xanthogranulomatous Appendicitis: A Rare Pathological Finding Associated With Delayed Appendectomy.

Xanthogranulomatous inflammation of the appendix is a rare pathological finding associated with appendicitis and chronic inflammation. Its clinical significance is not fully understood, and diagnosis is primarily based on the histopathological review as imaging findings with CT and ultrasound are non-specific. Here, we present a case of a 64-year-old female with recurrent appendicitis who underwent an appendectomy with final pathological findings consistent with xanthogranulomatous appendicitis (XGA). We discuss the higher reported incidence of XGA in interval appendectomy specimens compared to emergency appendectomies, and how this relates to its proposed pathophysiology. We found that XGA is associated with a more challenging operative field and the need to convert from a laparoscopic to an open procedure, increasing the potential risks of surgical complications. The potential development of XGA should be considered when planning an interval appendectomy as it may impact operative planning, although there is no clear consensus on its clinical significance.

Silent but Significant: A Case Report of Appendiceal Mucocele.

Appendiceal mucocele is a rare disease that can sometimes mimic acute appendicitis or be discovered accidentally during surgeries. The clinical presentation of appendiceal mucocele is observed as lumen distension due to mucin accumulation. This condition has both benign and malignant underlying etiologies, which can be confirmed by histopathological examination. Acute presentation of appendiceal mucocele is rare and mostly resembles the symptoms of acute appendicitis. The treatment of appendiceal mucocele is crucial due to the risk of pseudomyxoma peritonei caused by the spread of mucus, mucocele perforation, or the presence of malignancy such as mucinous carcinoma. Surgical resection, either appendicectomy, typhlectomy, or sometimes right hemicolectomy, is the recommended management approach. This is a case of a 74-year-old male with pain in the abdomen as the major presenting complaint. He had a palpable right iliac fossa mass. The diagnosis of appendiceal mucocele was made by contrast-enhanced computed tomography, which was later confirmed by histopathology. The patient underwent surgical resection and was doing well at the three-month follow-up.

The incidence of incidental neoplasia in pathology samples of patient who underwent appendectomy due to acute appendicitis. A single center experience: 6446 cases.

PURPOSE: Appendectomy is the standard treatment of acute appendicitis. However, recent advancements have introduced medical treatment as a potential alternative. Within this context, it's important to recognize the rare occurrence of appendiceal tumors, often incidentally discovered during histopathological examination following appendectomy. Consequently, there's a concern about the possibility of overlooking appendiceal neoplasms, particularly in cases where conservative treatment for acute appendicitis is considered. METHODS: The files of patients who underwent surgery for acute appendicitis between January 2015 and December 2023 and were diagnosed with neoplasia in their pathology reports were retrospectively registered. Demographic characteristics of the patients, laboratory and imaging features, details of the surgery performed, preoperative and intraoperative suspicion of neoplasm and data from pathology reports were collected and analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 6446 patients were operated for acute appendicitis. Neoplasia was detected in the histopathological examination of 93 patients (1.44%). Acute appendicitis was diagnosed in 51.6% of the patients by computed tomography. Neoplasm suspicion was present in 9.7% of patients in preoperative imaging methods and in 6.5% of patients intraoperatively. Only appendectomy was performed in 94.5% of patients. The most common appendiceal neoplasm is neuroendocrine tumors (40.9%), followed by appendiceal mucinous neoplasm (29%), sessile serrated adenoma (15%), and adenocarcinoma (6.5%). CONCLUSION: Although appendiceal neoplasms are relatively rare in proportion, they represent a significant numerical value due to the density of cases. Therefore, this information should be taken into consideration when evaluating treatment options for acute appendicitis.

Primary omental torsion with clinical masquerading as acute appendicitis and radiological key for diagnosis.

Omental torsion is a medical condition characterized by the twisting of the omentum along its longitudinal axis, which leads to compromised blood flow. This condition is rarely diagnosed before surgery and can present symptoms similar to other causes of acute surgical abdomen. This report details a case of primary omental torsion initially suspected to be acute appendicitis. The patient was admitted to the hospital with symptoms of lower right quadrant abdominal pain and mild fever. Computed tomography imaging revealed a twisted mass of fatty tissue with surrounding fat stranding changes, but no signs of appendicitis were found, indicating omental torsion. The patient underwent surgery to remove the twisted and necrotic omentum, leading to an improvement in symptoms. This case highlights the challenges in diagnosis and the crucial role of computed tomography imaging in managing this rare condition.

Assessment of diagnostic value of ultrasound and multi-slice spiral computed tomography in acute appendicitis: a retrospective study.

PURPOSE: Ultrasound and multi-slice spiral computed tomography (CT) are frequently used to assist the diagnosis of acute appendicitis (AA), and the examination results may vary among different demographics. This study aimed to compare the diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound and CT for AA. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of patients diagnosed with AA who underwent emergency surgery at our hospital from March 2021 to August 2023, with postoperative pathological results as the gold standard. Differences in the diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound and CT for different types of AA, age groups, and body mass index (BMI) values were then analyzed. RESULTS: The overall sample comprised 279 confirmed cases of AA, with 64 cases of simple appendicitis, 127 cases of suppurative appendicitis, and 88 cases of gangrenous appendicitis. For these three pathological classifications, the diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound was 68.75% (44/64), 73.22% (93/127), and 81.81% (72/88), respectively, while the diagnostic accuracy of CT was 71.87% (46/64), 82.67% (105/127), and 90.90% (80/88), respectively. There was no statistically significant difference in the overall diagnostic accuracy between the two methods (P > 0.05). Subgroup analysis showed no difference in diagnostic accuracy between the two methods for patients with normal BMI (P > 0.05). However, for overweight, obese, and elderly patients, CT provided significantly better diagnostic accuracy than ultrasound (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: While ultrasound and CT have similar diagnostic accuracy for different pathological types of AA, CT is more accurate for overweight, obese, and elderly patients.

An Uncommon Consequence of Perforated Acute Appendicitis in Elderly Patients: Fournier's Gangrene.

Acute appendicitis that is not diagnosed and treated promptly typically results in serious complications that raise the risk of necrotizing fasciitis, particularly in elderly patients. We present a case of a 77-year-old male, who presented to the emergency department with a clinical manifestation of Fournier's gangrene caused by acute perforated appendicitis. The patient had no symptoms or signs of an acute abdomen, and within three days he developed significant unilateral scrotal swelling and skin changes. Our case demonstrates the need to treat Fournier's gangrene as a consequence of an intra-abdominal infectious disease, particularly in elderly comorbid patients with atypical symptoms of acute appendicitis, and highlights the importance of early surgical intervention.

Acute appendicitis induced by bone fragment ingestion: A pediatrics case report.

Acute appendicitis is an ordinary surgical emergency, typically attributed to luminal obstruction by fecaliths or lymphoid hyperplasia. However, ingested foreign bodies as an etiology are rare but increasingly recognized, particularly in pediatric patients. We present the case of a 9-year-old male patient who presented to the emergency department with symptoms consistent with acute appendicitis. Further investigation revealed the presence of a bone fragment within the appendix, leading to acute inflammation. Foreign body ingestion should be considered in pediatric patients with acute appendicitis. This case report underscores the importance of comprehensive clinical evaluation and appropriate diagnostic imaging modalities in guiding optimal treatment strategies.

Non-Operative Management of Uncomplicated Appendicitis in Children: Can Patients Be Discharged From the Emergency Department?

INTRODUCTION: Non-operative management of uncomplicated appendicitis in children is a safe alternative to laparoscopic appendectomy. The purpose of this study is to determine the feasibility of nonoperative outpatient management of uncomplicated appendicitis in pediatric patients. METHODS: A standardized pathway for non-operative outpatient management of uncomplicated appendicitis in children (NOMA-C) was implemented in a university pediatric surgery practice starting October 2021. Those who met criteria would be considered for discharge from the emergency department (ED) with oral antibiotics and close followup over the following year. A quality improvement project started concurrently to monitor patients for recurrent symptoms of appendicitis. RESULTS: A total of 121 patients were diagnosed with acute appendicitis during the study period (October 2021 to April 2023). Forty-five children (38%) met criteria for the NOMA-C protocol, and 11 patients/families chose appendectomy. Of the 34 patients who pursued nonoperative management, 14 patients were admitted to the hospital and 20 patients were discharged from the ED. Total time in the ED/hospital was significantly shorter for patients discharged from the ED (7 hours versus 23 hours; p<0.001). At one year follow up only 4 (12%) had undergone appendectomy. There were no adverse events for patients who underwent nonoperative management. CONCLUSION: A protocol offering non-operative management of appendicitis with an option for outpatient management was feasible and safe. Outpatient management was associated with shorter ED/hospital stays than those admitted. Future studies should evaluate whether this protocol can be adopted by EDs without pediatric surgery services to avoid the need for transfer.

A rare case of superior mesenteric venous and portal vein thrombosis in complicated appendicitis.

Superior mesenteric venous (SMV) thrombosis is a rare complication of severe appendicitis. Early recognition is due to improved imaging modalities, which ultimately lead to more prompt intervention. Despite being an uncommon phenomenon, SMV thrombosis can have complications stemming from venous hypertension, such as gastric and esophageal varices, bowel ischemia, sepsis, and death. As this is a rare phenomenon, specific treatment guidelines and algorithms are lacking in the current literature. This case report describes a 23-year-old male patient whose recovery from a laparoscopic appendectomy was complicated with both an SMV and portal vein thrombosis.

Appendectomy: Cross-sectional study of the effects of COVID-19 in a hospital in South Brazil.

Background: COVID-19 has further burdened the Brazilian healthcare system, especially emergencies. Patients may have delayed seeking care for surgical abdominal pain. Delays in the approach may have impacted clinical evolution and outcomes. This study evaluated appendectomies and their complications performed by the public system during one-year follow-up of COVID-19 in a hospital in southern Brazil. Materials and methods: In this hospital-based cross-sectional study, we included adult patients who underwent appendectomy from March 2019 to April 2021 (n = 162). Patients were divided into pre-pandemic (n = 78) and pandemic (n = 84) groups based on the surgery date. The analyzed variables included hospitalization duration, intensive care unit (ICU) admission, surgical approach, histopathological findings, COVID-19 testing, patient outcomes, and 30-day survival rate. Results: The cohorts exhibited similar epidemiology, with the sex ratio and average age being maintained. No statistical difference was found in the 30-day survival rate and clinical outcomes. Of the four patients admitted to the ICU, three belonged to the pandemic cohort and tested negative for COVID-19. Only 47.6 % of the patients in the pandemic cohort underwent COVID-19 polymerase chain reaction examination; one tested positive (2.5 %). Conclusion: This study demonstrated that there was no increased risk for appendectomies during the first wave of the pandemic. Surgeries were safe during this period. Patients continued to access the emergency service despite surgical abdominal pain and restrictive measures imposed by health authorities. The similar results observed across cohorts are attributed to the readiness of the teams and the availability of medical surgical equipment in safe quantities.

Indication of conservative treatment by antibiotics for uncomplicated and complicated acute appendicitis.

BACKGROUND: Acute appendicitis is one of the most common emergency abdominal disease, and recent studies have evaluated conservative treatment using antibiotics for uncomplicated appendicitis. Although the efficacy of conservative treatment for uncomplicated appendicitis is known, its efficacy for complicated appendicitis remains unknown, so are risk factors for the conservative treatment of appendicitis. In our institution, conservative treatment has long been the first choice for most appendicitis cases, except for perforation. Therefore, this novel study investigated the outcomes of conservative treatment for uncomplicated and complicated acute appendicitis and the risk factors associated with conservative treatment. AIM: To investigate the indication of conservative treatment by antibiotics for uncomplicated and complicated acute appendicitis. METHODS: We investigated 270 patients who received conservative treatment for acute appendicitis at the Nishitokyo Central General Hospital, between April 2011 and February 2022. Twenty-eight (10.3%) patients were resistant to conservative treatment and underwent surgery. We retrospectively investigated the outcomes of conservative treatment for appendicitis and the risk factors for resistance to conservative treatment using the receiver operating characteristic curves and Cox hazard model. RESULTS: Two hundred and forty-two (89.7%) patients improved with conservative treatment. The significant and independent predictors of resistance to conservative treatment were body temperature ≥ 37.3 °C, appendicolith and Douglas sinus fluid visible on computed tomography (CT). The rate of resistance to conservative treatment was 66.7% (6/9) for patients with the above three factors, 22.9% (8/35) for patients with two factors (appendicolith and body temperature ≥ 37.3 °C), 16.7% (2/12) for patients with two factors (Douglas sinus fluid and appendicolith) and 11.1% (1/9) for patients with two factors (Douglas sinus fluid and body temperature ≥ 37.3 °C). CONCLUSION: A temperature ≥ 37.3 °C, appendicolith and Douglas sinus fluid on CT might be clinical risk factors of resistance to conservative treatment for acute appendicitis.

Conversion Rates, Causes, and Preoperative Associated Factors in 3,411 Laparoscopic Appendectomies: Insights after Nearly Three Decades of Laparoscopy and an Analysis of the Learning Curve.

INTRODUCTION: Laparoscopic appendectomy is the current gold standard in treating acute appendicitis. Despite the low frequency of conversion to open surgery, it remains necessary in certain cases. Our primary outcome was to identify the conversion rate of laparoscopic appendectomy to open surgery and how this rate has changed over the learning curve. Second, we aim to determine the causes of conversion, their changes in frequency over time and to identify preoperative factors associated with conversion. METHODS: A retrospective comparative study with prospective case registry was conducted. All patients who underwent laparoscopic appendectomy from January 2000 to December 2023 at a high-volume center were analyzed. The series was divided into six periods, each spanning 4 years. All patients who underwent totally laparoscopic appendectomy and those requiring conversion to open appendectomy were included. RESULTS: A total of 3,411 appendectomies were performed during the study period, with an overall conversion rate of 0.96% (33/3,411). Our analysis showed that after the first three periods (12 years), the conversion rate decreased and reached a plateau of approximately 0.4%. The most common causes of conversion were perforation of the appendix base (9/33), abdominal cavity adhesions (8/33), and pneumoperitoneum intolerance (3/33). Age over 65, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score III/IV and symptom duration exceeding 24 h were preoperative factors significantly associated with conversion at univariate analysis. However, only age (p 0.0001) and symptoms exceeding 24 h (p 0.01) remained independently associated with conversion after multivariate analysis. CONCLUSION: In experienced centers, conversion from laparoscopic appendectomy to open appendectomy is uncommon, but remains necessary in certain cases. Despite identifying a population with higher association with conversion which should be advised preoperatively, due to the low incidence of conversions once the learning curve is overcome, an initial laparoscopic approach is the preferred choice.

Are Preoperative CT Findings Useful in Predicting the Duration of Laparoscopic Appendectomy in Pediatric Patients? A Single Center Study.

Background/Objectives: Preoperative computed tomography (CT) imaging plays a vital role in accurately diagnosing acute appendicitis and assessing the severity of the condition, as well as the complexity of the surgical procedure. CT imaging provides detailed information on the anatomical and pathological aspects of appendicitis, allowing surgeons to anticipate technical challenges and select the most appropriate surgical approach. This retrospective study aimed to investigate the correlation between preoperative CT findings and the duration of laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) in pediatric patients. Methods: This retrospective study included 104 pediatric patients diagnosed with acute appendicitis via contrast-enhanced CT who subsequently underwent laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) between November 2021 and February 2024. CT images were meticulously reviewed by two experienced radiologists blinded to the clinical and surgical outcomes. The severity of appendicitis was evaluated using a five-point scale based on the presence of periappendiceal fat, fluid, extraluminal air, and abscesses. Results: The average operation time was 51.1 ± 21.6 min. Correlation analysis revealed significant positive associations between operation time and neutrophil count (p = 0.014), C-reactive protein levels (p = 0.002), symptom-to-operation time (p = 0.004), and appendix diameter (p = 0.017). The total CT score also showed a significant correlation with operation time (p < 0.001). Multiple regression analysis demonstrated that a symptom duration of more than 2 days (p = 0.047), time from CT to surgery (p = 0.039), and the presence of a periappendiceal abscess (p = 0.005) were independent predictors of prolonged operation time. In the perforated appendicitis group, the presence of a periappendiceal abscess on CT was significantly associated with prolonged operation time (p = 0.020). In the non-perforated group, the presence of periappendiceal fluid was significantly related to longer operation times (p = 0.026). Conclusions: In our study, preoperative CT findings, particularly the presence of a periappendiceal abscess, were significantly associated with prolonged operation times in pediatric patients undergoing laparoscopic appendectomy. Elevated CRP levels, the time between CT imaging and surgery, and a symptom duration of more than 2 days were also found to significantly impact the procedure's duration.

A Comparison of the Alvarado Score and the Raja Isteri Pengiran Anak Saleha Appendicitis (RIPASA) Score in the Diagnosis of Acute Appendicitis: A Prospective Cohort Study.

Background Diagnosing acute appendicitis remains a problem, especially in teenagers with right lower quadrant pain. Imaging studies aid in accurate diagnosis but have limitations such as cost and availability. The Modified Alvarado Scoring System (MASS) is simple and cost-effective with fewer parameters. The Raja Isteri Pengiran Anak Saleha Appendicitis scoring system (RIPASA), designed for Asian populations, includes more parameters. This study compares the effectiveness of RIPASA and Alvarado scores in diagnosing acute appendicitis in a specific clinical setting. Objectives To compare the scoring systems of RIPASA and Alvarado in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis at a tertiary care hospital. Methods Data has been collected from all patients who attended the NRI general hospital emergency department and outpatient wing with acute appendicitis, admitted as inpatients based on clinical history and relevant investigations. Patients satisfying inclusion and exclusion criteria were selected and the basic investigations were done. Summary statistics were done using mean, standard deviation and proportions. Inferential statistics were done by using an independent t-test, kappa statistic, sensitivity and specificity with a 95% confidence interval (CI). All the measurements are done using the statistical package for the social sciences (SPSS) software version 21.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA) and open epidemiological (OpenEpi) software 3.01. A probability (p) <0.05 is considered as statistically significant. Results A total of 110 patients were analyzed for this study with a majority (39%) of them in the 21-30 age group. In our study, females (53%) outnumbered males (47%). Ultrasound findings in our cohort were acute appendicitis (93%), chronic appendicitis (2%) and normal appendix (5%). However, histopathology reported acute appendicitis (75%), chronic appendicitis (9%) and negative/non-specific (15%). The probability of appendicitis as predicted by Alvarado and RIPASA were 40% and 51% respectively. Definitive diagnosis of appendicitis was made in 16.4% with RIPASA whereas only 5.5% with Alvarado. When comparing the Alvarado and RIPASA scores, the sensitivity or true positive rate was higher for RIPASA (73.63%) than for Alvarado (50.55%). Conclusion There was a significant difference between the mean scores in Alvarado and RIPASA inpatients with scores suggestive of appendicitis and no appendicitis. Diagnostic accuracy was higher in RIPASA scoring compared to ALVARDO scoring. There was a significant statistical difference between the two scoring systems. When it comes to diagnosing in low-resource countries the study recommends a combination of Alvarado and RIPASA scoring systems.

Efficacy of automated machine learning models and feature engineering for diagnosis of equivocal appendicitis using clinical and computed tomography findings.

This study evaluates the diagnostic efficacy of automated machine learning (AutoGluon) with automated feature engineering and selection (autofeat), focusing on clinical manifestations, and a model integrating both clinical manifestations and CT findings in adult patients with ambiguous computed tomography (CT) results for acute appendicitis (AA). This evaluation was compared with conventional single machine learning models such as logistic regression(LR) and established scoring systems such as the Adult Appendicitis Score(AAS) to address the gap in diagnostic approaches for uncertain AA cases. In this retrospective analysis of 303 adult patients with indeterminate CT findings, the cohort was divided into appendicitis (n = 115) and non-appendicitis (n = 188) groups. AutoGluon and autofeat were used for AA prediction. The AutoGluon-clinical model relied solely on clinical data, whereas the AutoGluon-clinical-CT model included both clinical and CT data. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) and other metrics for the test dataset, namely accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and F1 score, were used to compare AutoGluon models with single machine learning models and the AAS. The single ML models in this study were LR, LASSO regression, ridge regression, support vector machine, decision tree, random forest, and extreme gradient boosting. Feature importance values were extracted using the "feature_importance" attribute from AutoGluon. The AutoGluon-clinical model demonstrated an AUROC of 0.785 (95% CI 0.691-0.890), and the ridge regression model with only clinical data revealed an AUROC of 0.755 (95% CI 0.649-0.861). The AutoGluon-clinical-CT model (AUROC 0.886 with 95% CI 0.820-0.951) performed better than the ridge model using clinical and CT data (AUROC 0.852 with 95% CI 0.774-0.930, p = 0.029). A new feature, exp(-(duration from pain to CT)3 + rebound tenderness), was identified (importance = 0.049, p = 0.001). AutoML (AutoGluon) and autoFE (autofeat) enhanced the diagnosis of uncertain AA cases, particularly when combining CT and clinical findings. This study suggests the potential of integrating AutoML and autoFE in clinical settings to improve diagnostic strategies and patient outcomes and make more efficient use of healthcare resources. Moreover, this research supports further exploration of machine learning in diagnostic processes.