2023 guidelines on the management of psoriasis by the Dermatological Society of Singapore.

Introduction: Psoriasis is a multisystem, chronic, inflammatory dermatological disease. In routine clinical practice, the management of psoriasis varies significantly. The current study aimed to develop a set of practice guidelines relevant to dermatology practice in Singapore. Method: The Psoriasis Therapeutic Guidelines Workgroup, comprising members of the Dermato-logical Society of Singapore with a subspecialisation in psoriasis, was convened to develop the guidelines. Clinical questions on selected topics were generated and refined by the workgroup. A literature search using PubMed was performed on their assigned topics from June 2013 to December 2023. The articles were included and graded based on the level of evidence. Results: The guidelines address topics ranging from clinical assessment to practical considerations in the management of mild, moderate and severe psoriasis, including delivery of care, referrals to specialists and adherence to treatment. The recommended therapies include phototherapy, methotrexate, acitretin, cyclosporine; apremilast; topical corticoste-roids, calcipotriol, topical calcineurin inhibitors; and biologics (i.e. adalimumab, infliximab, secukinumab, ixekizumab, ustekinumab, etanercept) either in combina-tion or as monotherapy. Common therapeutic concerns relating to biologic use were addressed. Recommendations on generalised pustular psoriasis, palmoplantar pustular psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis were also made. Patients on systemic therapy would receive appropriate vaccine counselling. Therapeutic implica-tions in special populations, such as pregnant/ lactating women, children, the elderly, those undergo-ing surgery and those suffering from specific infections and cancer were addressed. Conclusion: These guidelines were developed for dermatologists, family physicians, rheumatologists and other specialists to support their selection of appropriate management options.

Immune-Mediated Inflammatory Diseases and Cancer - a dangerous liaison.

Patients with Immune-Mediated Inflammatory Diseases (IMIDs) are known to have an elevated risk of developing cancer, but the exact causative factors remain subject to ongoing debate. This narrative review aims to present the available evidence concerning the intricate relationship between these two conditions. Environmental influences and genetic predisposition lead to a dysregulated immune response resulting in chronic inflammation, which is crucial in the pathogenesis of IMIDs and oncogenic processes. Mechanisms such as the inflammatory microenvironment, aberrant intercellular communication due to abnormal cytokine levels, excessive reparative responses, and pathological angiogenesis are involved. The chronic immunosuppression resulting from IMIDs treatments further adds to the complexity of the pathogenic scenario. In conclusion, this review highlights critical gaps in the current literature, suggesting potential avenues for future research. The intricate interplay between IMIDs and cancer necessitates more investigation to deepen our understanding and improve patient management.

Refractory Dupilumab-Induced Inflammatory Arthritis Treated by Upadacitinib: A 'Janus Kinase (JAK)' of All Trades.

Dupilumab, a monoclonal interleukin (IL)-4 receptor α antagonist, is used to treat moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis. Uncommonly, inflammatory arthritis and enthesitis may occur upon initiation of dupilumab. Upadacitinib, a Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitor, is an alternative medication approved for moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis but is also used to treat inflammatory arthritis. We report a case of dupilumab-induced inflammatory arthritis that was refractory to oral nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and corticosteroids and was successfully treated by upadacitinib, which also treated the atopic dermatitis. A 40-year-old female with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis was treated with dupilumab for 10 months, showing improvement in her skin. However, she then developed recurrent right knee effusions, polyarthritis in her hands, feet, and knees, and prolonged stiffness. She noticed swelling which developed abruptly in her right knee, then progressed to multiple joints including fingers, wrists, ankles, and persisted for four weeks prior to seeking additional medical care. She denied any recent preceding trauma. Joint pain was worsened by movement and morning stiffness lasted over two hours. Trials of ibuprofen or celecoxib and application of ice did not alleviate it. She had an elevated erythrocyte sedimentation rate of 29 mm/hr and C-reactive protein of 21.6 mg/dL. She tested negative for antinuclear antibody, rheumatoid factor, anti-cyclic citrullinated protein, human leukocyte antigen B27, Lyme enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), and Western blot. She was initially treated with a prednisone taper, but the symptoms returned upon reaching 10 mg daily. She continued on dupilumab for four weeks, but stopped as the joint symptoms progressed. With cessation, her atopic dermatitis also became active again. Despite stopping the dupilumab, she continued to have diffuse swelling and tenderness in her hands, feet, knees, and wrists over the next 12 weeks. Upadacitinib, within one month of initiating, led to improvement in both joints and skin. She was able to taper off the corticosteroids. At five months, she continued to not have swelling or tenderness in her joints, and her skin was well-controlled. We report the first successful use of upadacitinib for the treatment of refractory dupilumab-induced inflammatory arthritis as well as atopic dermatitis. The use of JAK inhibitors should be considered to treat this uncommon condition, given that they also treat atopic dermatitis.

Does the Combined Arteritis Damage Score (CARDS) in the Diagnosis of Takayasu Arteritis Predict Prognosis and Need for Biologic Therapy?

BACKGROUND: We aimed to investigate the prognostic value of the combined arteritis damage score (CARDS) in Takayasu arteritis (TAK) patients to predict the need for biologic treatment at diagnosis and the possible contribution of wall thickness (WT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Blind evaluation of MRA/CTA at the time of diagnosis was performed by a reader rheumatologist (RR) and an interventional radiologist (RIR). The CARDS damage score for 21 arterial regions was assessed as normal, mild or moderate/severe stenosis, occclusion or aneursym/dilatation. Additionally, WT was scored for all regions as present or absent. A modified CARDS (mCARDS) was calculated as the sum of CARDS and the number of WT areas. RESULTS: According to follow-up treatment, 10 patients with non-biologic treatment (non-BT) (F/M:8/2, median age 37.5 years) and 15 patients with biologic treatment (BT) (F/M:13/2, median age 30 years) were included. Indian Takatasu Arteritis Score (ITAS), CRP, and ESR levels were similar in both groups. CARDS (1.4 (0-7.2) vs 4.5 (.6-19), P: .003), WT (1.5 (0-8) vs 7 (1-21), P < .001), and mCARDS (4 (0-14.2) vs 11.4 (1.6-40), P < .001) scores were significantly higher in the BT group compared to nonBT group. Cohen's kappa coefficient between RR and RIR for WT was .99 with 99.6% aggrement, and CARDS was .98 with 99.6% agreement. The AUC values for CARDS, WT, and mCARDS scores were .748 (.605-.892), .837 (.723-.950), and .847 (.735-.958), respectively, and P value was <.0001. CONCLUSIONS: The prediction of prognosis and biologic treatment need at TAK diagnosis using non-invasive angiographic images can improve outcomes and prompt closer follow-up. The combination of CARDS and WT as mCARDS achieved the highest sensitivity and specificity, and all scores appear useful for predicting prognosis.

Bone-protective effects of neutralizing angiopoietin-like protein 4 monoclonal antibody in rheumatoid arthritis.

Despite recent advances, rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients remain refractory to therapy. Dysregulated overproduction of angiopoietin-like 4 protein (ANGPTL4) is thought to be contributed to the disease development. ANGPTL4 was initially identified as a regulator of lipid metabolism, which is hydrolyzed to N-terminal (nANGPTL4) and C-terminal (cANGPTL4) fragments in vivo. cANGPTL4 is involved in several non-lipid-related processes, including angiogenesis and inflammation. The present study revealed that the level of ANGPTL4 was markedly elevated in the sera and synovial tissues from patients with RA versus controls. The administration of a neutralizing antibody against cANGPTL4 (anti-cANGPTL4 Ab) resulted in the inhibition of inflammatory processes and bone loss in animal models of collagen-induced arthritis (CIA) and adjuvant-induced arthritis (AIA). Transcriptomic and proteomic profiling of synovial tissues from AIA model indicated that the anti-cANGPTL4 Ab inhibited fibroblast-like synoviocytes (FLS) immigration and inflammatory-induced osteoclastogenesis. Mechanistically, the anti-cANGPTL4 Ab has been shown to inhibit TNF-α-induced inflammatory cascades in RA-FLS through the sirtuin 1/nuclear factor-κB signaling pathway. Moreover, the anti-cANGPTL4 Ab was found to block FLS invasion- and immigration-induced osteoclast activation. Collectively, these findings identify ANGPTL4 as a prospective biomarker for the diagnosis of RA, and targeting cANGPTL4 may represent a potential therapeutic strategy.

Biologics in Hypereosinophilic Syndrome and Eosinophilic Granulomatosis with Polyangiitis.

Hypereosinophilic syndrome (HES) and eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis (EGPA) are complex disorders defined by blood and tissue eosinophilia and heterogeneous clinical manifestations. Historically, the mainstay of therapy for both conditions has been systemic glucocorticoids. However, recent availability of biologics that directly or indirectly target eosinophils has provided new avenues to pursue improved outcomes with decreased toxicity. In this article, we summarize the evidence supporting the use of specific biologics in HES and/or EGPA and provide a framework for their clinical use in patients.

Ulcerative colitis: molecular insights and intervention therapy.

Ulcerative colitis (UC) is a chronic inflammatory bowel disease characterized by abdominal pain, diarrhea, rectal bleeding, and weight loss. The pathogenesis and treatment of UC remain key areas of research interest. Various factors, including genetic predisposition, immune dysregulation, and alterations in the gut microbiota, are believed to contribute to the pathogenesis of UC. Current treatments for UC include 5-aminosalicylic acids, corticosteroids, immunosuppressants, and biologics. However, study reported that the one-year clinical remission rate is only around 40%. It is necessary to prompt the exploration of new treatment modalities. Biologic therapies, such as anti-TNF-α monoclonal antibody and JAK inhibitor, primarily consist of small molecules targeting specific pathways, effectively inducing and maintaining remission. Given the significant role of the gut microbiota, research into intestinal microecologics, such as probiotics and prebiotics, and fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) shows promising potential in UC treatment. Additionally, medicinal herbs, such as chili pepper and turmeric, used in complementary therapy have shown promising results in UC management. This article reviews recent findings on the mechanisms of UC, including genetic susceptibility, immune cell dynamics and cytokine regulation, and gut microbiota alterations. It also discusses current applications of biologic therapy, herbal therapy, microecologics, and FMT, along with their prospects and challenges.

Residual metabolic burden in young psoriasis patients successfully treated with biologics.

Metabolic disorders are common in patients with psoriasis and contribute significantly to an increased cardiovascular risk. While biologic therapy is very successful in clearing skin lesions, its impact on metabolic parameters is uncertain. Our aim was to investigate the residual metabolic burden in psoriasis patients successfully treated with biologic therapy. We conducted a cross-sectional study of 80 young patients (54 men, 26 women, aged 30-45 years) successfully treated with either adalimumab, secukinumab or guselkumab and topical therapy or methotrexate, and 20 healthy controls. Anthropometric parameters, lipid levels and metabolic indices (HOMA-IR, TyG index and FIB-4 index) were measured. Patients did not receive any other treatments to exclude confounding effects. After analysis, we found that patients treated with three different biologics had similar metabolic status, only the FIB-4 index was higher in the adalimumab group than in the secukinumab and guselkumab treatment groups. There were no significant differences between the patients treated with biologics and the control group. The comparison with patients treated topically or with methotrexate showed that only triglyceride levels, HOMA-IR, TyG index, and FIB-4 index were elevated in patients treated with adalimumab compared to patients treated with topical therapy. Finally, metabolic status was also similar in patients treated with methotrexate or topical therapy. In conclusion, this study suggests that psoriasis patients successfully treated with biologics have similar metabolic parameters to the control group and patients treated with topical therapy or methotrexate. This indicates that there is no significant residual metabolic burden in young patients successfully treated with biologics. These results are clinically relevant and should be considered in the treatment of psoriasis patients.The study is registered at http://clinicaltrials.gov (identifier: NCT05957120). Date of registration: 24th of July 2023.

High serum levels of ustekinumab are associated with better clinical outcomes during maintenance treatment for inflammatory bowel disease.

Background: Ustekinumab (UST) is an effective treatment option in Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC). However, it still remains unclear if therapeutic drug monitoring could be helpful to guide clinicians. Objectives: The aim of our study was to analyze the relationship between UST through levels (USTTL) and clinical outcomes in real-world inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients. Design: We performed a unicentric retrospective study including patients with IBD under UST treatment with at least one level determination. Methods: The following variables were analyzed at the initiation of UST and at each USTTL measurement: clinical response and remission using the Harvey-Bradshaw Index (HBI) for CD and the Partial Mayo Score (pMayo) for UC; biochemical response and remission using fecal calprotectin and C-reactive protein, among others. Two periods were considered: P1 (time between induction and the first determination of USTTL) and P2 (time between USTTL1 and the second determination of USTTL). Results: We included 125 patients, 117 with CD. In P1, 62.4% of patients were on subcutaneous maintenance, and the median USTTL1 was 3.1 µg/mL (1.6-5.3). In 44.8% of CD patients (48/117), clinical remission was achieved, with USTTL1 significantly higher than those who did not achieve remission (3.7 µg/mL (2.3-5.4) vs 2.3 µg/mL (1.1-5.2); p = 0.04). In the 46 patients with two determinations, statistically significant differences were found between variables in P2 versus P1: clinical remission (73.9% vs 21.7%; p = 0.001); USTTL (7.2 µg/mL (4.7-11.7) vs 3.4 µg/mL (1.9-6.4); p < 0.001), HBI (4 (4-4.3) vs 8 (4-9); p < 0.001), pMayo (1 (1-3.3) vs 4.5 (3-5); p = 0.042), and corticosteroid use (26.1% vs 41.3%; p = 0.024). Receiver-Operating-Characteristic (ROC) curves were calculated for clinical remission in P2, with USTTL cutoff value of 6.34 µg/mL for clinical remission and a high rate of intensified patients (98%). Conclusion: High serum levels of UST were associated with clinical remission during treatment for IBD under intensification treatment, with a cutoff point of 6.3 µg/mL.

Hidradenitis suppurativa: a new therapeutic approach for an old disease.

Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a chronic inflammatory disease characterised by recurrent painful nodules, abscesses, fistulas and scarring. The primary distinguishing factor in the complex, yet still not fully understood, pathogenesis is an inflammation occurring within the hair follicle, followed by an immune response leading to further development of the skin lesions seen in HS. The treatment of patients with HS is very difficult due to the complexity of the lesions and the frequent tendency to recurrence, which also has a negative impact on the psychological state of patients and directly translates into a reduced quality of life. This review article addresses the pathogenesis, clinical presentation of HS and, in particular, explores the new therapeutic options available.

Opioid Use and Outcomes in Patients Hospitalized With Acute Severe Ulcerative Colitis.

BACKGROUND: Opioid use has not been shown to improve hospitalized inflammatory bowel disease patient pain scores and may prolong the length of stay (LOS). Additional clinical implications of opioid use, particularly high amounts, in the hospital setting have not yet been explored. We sought to determine how high opioid use impacts clinical outcomes in acute severe ulcerative colitis (ASUC). METHODS: In this single-center study, we identified all patients hospitalized with ASUC who received intravenous corticosteroids from July 1, 2014 to December 31, 2021. Clinical outcomes including opioid exposure, cumulative intravenous corticosteroid dose, biologic rescue therapy initiation date, colectomy rate, opioid prescription at discharge, LOS, and hospitalization cost were collected. High opioid use was defined as ≥40 oral morphine equivalents (OMEs) per day. A univariable logistic regression was performed to evaluate the association of high opioid use with ASUC outcomes. RESULTS: 185 eligible hospitalizations for ASUC were evaluated. 75 patients (41%) received opioids during hospitalization, and 20 patients (11%) received ≥40 OMEs/day. High opioid use was associated with a median 3-day delay in biologic rescue therapy initiation when compared with low/no opioid use (P = .02). 70% of patients with high opioid use received an opioid prescription at discharge compared with 10% of those with low/no use (P < .001). Opioid use was not associated with LOS, duration of corticosteroid therapy, colectomy rate, or hospitalization cost. CONCLUSIONS: Among ASUC hospitalizations, high opioid use was associated with delayed biologic rescue therapy initiation and higher rates of opioid prescriptions at discharge.

In this single-center study of patients hospitalized with acute severe ulcerative colitis, opioid use was associated with delayed initiation of biologic rescue therapy and higher rates of discharge prescriptions for opioids.

The Successful Use of Upadacitinib as Monotherapy for Hidradenitis Suppurativa and Ulcerative Colitis in the Setting of Refractory Disease.

Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) and ulcerative colitis (UC) are associated chronic inflammatory conditions with complex disease courses and potential for overlapping therapeutic management. We describe a case of severe pediatric HS and UC that were poorly controlled despite several standard-of-care therapies, including infliximab and ustekinumab. Transitioning the patient to upadacitinib monotherapy resulted in clinical improvement of both her UC and HS within 3 months, and she was then able to be weaned off her other systemic therapies. While upadacitinib is not currently FDA-approved for HS or pediatric UC, this case report shows promise for upadacitinib monotherapy for both of these complex inflammatory disorders.

Tuberculosis reactivation following apremilast therapy for psoriasis: Time to consider routine TB screening?

Apremilast is a relatively new oral treatment for psoriasis, which reduces expression of pro-inflammatory factors, including tumour necrosis factor-α (TNFα), critical to the immune control of Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection. In randomised controlled trials (RCTs) for apremilast no new cases of active tuberculosis (TB) were identified, thus, screening for latent TB infection (LTBI) is not currently recommended prior to apremilast initiation. We describe a case of M.tuberculosis reactivation shortly after commencement of apremilast for psoriasis. We are recommending clinicians perform LTBI risk assessment in all patients, and appropriate LTBI screening in select populations prior to apremilast initiation.

Unmet needs in cervical cancer - can biological therapies plug the gap?

INTRODUCTION: Cervical cancer remains one of the most common gynecologic malignancies worldwide. A disproportionate burden of cases occurs in developing countries due to inadequate screening and treatment. Even among patients adequately treated, in the presence of locally advanced or recurrent disease, outcomes tend to be poor. The introduction of biologic therapy into treatment has increased overall survival; however, a considerable opportunity still exists to improve current standards in treatment. Biologics have shown antitumor activity in multiple tumor types and are actively being pursued for the management of cervical cancer. AREAS COVERED: In this article, we will discuss the historical evolution of biologic therapy in cervical cancer including use of angiogenesis inhibitors, immune checkpoint inhibitors, antibody-drug conjugates, and vaccines. We will review how these therapies have been integrated into current treatment recommendations and discuss ongoing investigations intended to improve clinical outcomes. We also postulate on persistent gaps in care. EXPERT OPINION: Biologic therapies have had a tremendous impact on our current approach to managing cervical cancer. We anticipate that significant more research and development will be committed to the continued investigation of biologics in cervical cancer in an effort to improve a historically difficult to treat malignancy.

Efficacy of Brodalumab in Patients with Psoriasis and Risk Factors for Treatment Failure: A Review of Post Hoc Analyses.

Factors such as obesity, alcohol consumption, and tobacco use are associated with both increased psoriasis severity and inadequate response to systemic and biologic therapies. Obesity is linked to chronic inflammation, which can contribute to psoriasis pathogenesis. Fixed-dose therapies may have reduced efficacy in patients with a higher body mass index, while weight-based dosing can increase the burden of drug-specific side effects. Alcohol and nicotine from tobacco have also been shown to stimulate keratinocyte and immune cell proliferation and production of proinflammatory cytokines. While these risk factors are prevalent among patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis, their influence on treatment outcomes may be overlooked when evaluating therapeutic options. Brodalumab is a fully human interleukin-17 receptor A antagonist approved for the treatment of moderate-to-severe psoriasis. In this review, we describe the lifestyle-related risk factors associated with decreased response to treatment. We further summarize the post hoc analyses of brodalumab in participant subgroups with moderate-to-severe psoriasis and a history of prior biologic failure, obesity, and alcohol or tobacco use from two phase 3 clinical trials (AMAGINE-2 and AMAGINE-3; ClinicalTrials.gov identifiers: NCT01708603 and NCT01708629, respectively). Our review of clinical trial and real-world data suggests that brodalumab is an efficacious and safe treatment option for patients with lifestyle factors that increase the likelihood of treatment failure, allowing them to achieve skin clearance and improve quality of life.

Rheumatic adverse events associated with biologic therapy for chronic rhinosinusitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Biologic therapies approved for treating chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) have well-established safety profiles but reports of rheumatic adverse events (AEs) are increasing and not well defined. This review aims to assess the risk and incidence of rheumatic AEs associated with biologic therapy in CRSwNP and summarize current reported management strategies. METHODS: A protocol was registered in PROSPERO [CRD42024525663]. A search was conducted in four electronic databases: Medline (Ovid), Embase, Scopus, and Cochrane CENTRAL from inception until January 4, 2024. Two reviewers independently screened citations and extracted data. Methodological quality was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute's critical appraisal tool. Data were pooled using a random effects model to calculate overall incidence and relative risk. RESULTS: Twenty-one studies met the final inclusion criteria, totaling 3434 patients of which 2763 (80%) received either dupilumab (n = 2257; 82%), mepolizumab (n = 372; 13%), or omalizumab (n = 134; 5%) for treatment of CRSwNP. The overall incidence rate for any on-treatment rheumatic AE was 0.05 per person-year (95% CI, 0.03-0.09, I2 = 75%). Biologic therapy increased the risk of developing a rheumatic AE (RR = 2.53; 95% CI, 1.29-4.94) compared with placebo. The most frequently reported rheumatic AE was arthralgia or joint pain (n = 94; 95%), followed by lupus-like syndrome or lupus erythematosus-like reaction (n = 2; 2.5%). Discontinuation of treatment was the most common intervention (n = 21, 39%). CONCLUSION: Biologic therapy increases the risk of rheumatic AEs in CRSwNP patients by over twofold. Healthcare providers should remain vigilant in monitoring rheumatic AEs and apply appropriate management strategies on a case-by-case basis.

Report of successful treatment of follicular occlusion triad with adalimumab and research progress on biologic therapy for follicular occlusion triad.

Purpose: This article aims to present a case report of a patient with Follicular occlusion triad (FOT) who achieved successful disease control with adalimumab combined with isotretinoin and provide a comprehensive review of the current research progress on biologic therapies for FOT.Methods: We report a case of a 22-year-old female patient diagnosed with FOT, who was treated with adalimumab combined with isotretinoin after failing to respond to conventional therapies. A systematic literature review was conducted to summarize the current research progress on biologic therapies for FOT, including TNF-α inhibitors, IL-17 inhibitors, IL-12/IL-23 inhibitors, IL-23 inhibitors, IL-1 inhibitors, and other novel biologic agents.Results: The patient achieved significant improvement in skin lesions, pain, and quality of life after three months of treatment with adalimumab combined with isotretinoin, without experiencing severe adverse reactions. The literature review revealed that adalimumab and secukinumab are the two FDA-approved biologics for FOT, while others, such as bimekizumab, infliximab, anakinra, and bermekimab, have shown promise in clinical studies.Conclusions: Biologic therapies have revolutionized FOT management, providing effective options for patients unresponsive to conventional treatments. As our understanding of FOT pathogenesis and the mechanisms of action of biologics grows, further advancements in biologic therapies for FOT are expected.

Vaccination strategies for patients under monoclonal antibody and other biological treatments: an updated comprehensive review based on EMA authorisations to January 2024.

INTRODUCTION: Monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) and other biological agents are being increasingly approved in the last years with very different indications. Their highly heterogeneous immunosuppressive effects, mechanisms of action and pharmacokinetics require comprehensive individualized vaccination schedules. AREAS COVERED: Vaccination for immunocompromised patients. Prevention and treatment with mAbs and other biological therapies. EXPERT OPINION: Current recommendations on vaccine schedules for patients under mAbs or other biological treatments are based on expert opinions and are not individualized according to each vaccine and treatment. No studies are focusing on the high heterogeneity of these agents, which are exponentially developed and used for many different indications. Recent paradigm changes in vaccine development (boosted by the COVID-19 pandemic) and in the mAbs use for prophylactic purposes (changing 'vaccination' by 'immunization' schedules) has been witnessed in the last years. We aimed at collecting all mAbs used for treatment or prevention, approved as of 1 January 2024, by the EMA. Based on available data on mAbs and vaccines, we propose a comprehensive guide for personalizing vaccination. Recent vaccine developments and current population strategies (e.g. zoster vaccination or prophylactic nirsevimab) are discussed. This review aims to be a practical guideline for professionals working in vaccine consultations for immunosuppressed patients.

Effectiveness and safety of tildrakizumab in individuals with HIV and psoriasis: A case series.

Psoriasis, a chronic inflammatory skin disease, presents unique challenges when co-occurring with HIV. Tildrakizumab, an IL-23p19 inhibitor, has demonstrated efficacy in treating moderate-to-severe psoriasis. This retrospective case series reports three individuals living with HIV and psoriasis treated with tildrakizumab. Clinical outcomes, including Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) and HIV viral load, were recorded over a year. All three patients achieved significant clinical improvements with tildrakizumab, with PASI scores improving by over 95%. No adverse effects were reported, and HIV viral loads remained undetectable. Tildrakizumab appears to be a safe and effective treatment option for psoriasis in individuals living with HIV, providing significant benefits without compromising HIV control.

Response to Biologic Therapy in Patients with Asthma and Reduced Pulmonary Diffusion Capacity.

INTRODUCTION: Asthma patients with a smoking history are usually excluded from asthma trials to exclude smoking-related comorbidities like chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Therefore, little is known about the efficacy of biologic therapy in asthma patients with reduced diffusing capacity of the lungs for carbon monoxide (DLCO). METHODS: This study aimed to assess the response to biologic therapy in asthma patients with reduced DLCO. A total of 77 consecutive patients undergoing biologic therapy in a routine clinical setting were included in the analysis and divided into three groups: DLCO ≥60%, DLCO <60% and <10 pack-years, and DLCO <60% and ≥10 pack-years = asthma and COPD comorbidity. Follow-up evaluations were conducted after a minimum of 6 months of therapy. RESULTS: After 34.0 ± 10.2 weeks, comparable therapeutic responses were observed between the three groups. There were no differences between the groups in terms of reduction in the annual acute exacerbation rate (AE median -3 [25th percentile -5; 75th percentile -1] vs. -6.1 [-11.3;-2.2] vs. -3 [-6;-2], p = 0.067), oral corticosteroid (OCS) doses (-5 [-10;0] vs. -1 [-7.5;0] vs. -7.5 [-10;-4] mg, p = 0.136), improvement in Asthma Control Test (ACT) scores (4 [0;9.3] vs. 3 [-1;6] vs. 4 [3;10], p = 0.276) or forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) improvement (5.5 [-2;21.5] vs. 0.5 [-2.8;9.3] vs. 5 [0;16] % predicted, p = 0.328). Linear regression analysis revealed no significant correlation between DLCO levels and changes in OCS dosage or AE rate, nor between DLCO and improvements in ACT scores or FEV1. Notably, a smaller proportion of patients exhibited a reduced transfer coefficient (DLCO/VA) (n = 13, 16.9%). This parameter did not significantly impact therapy response either. CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that biologic therapy can effectively manage asthma irrespective of DLCO measurements. Thus, reduced DLCO values should not preclude thorough asthma diagnosis and treatment. Further investigation into the utility of DLCO/VA assessment in this context is warranted.