Corrigendum: The prevalence and clinical relevance of the DFS immunofluorescence staining pattern in a large ANA-positive cohort.

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2022.829436.].

Significance of the immunofluorescence staining patterns and titres of the antinuclear antibody test in paediatric rheumatology setting.

BACKGROUND: Antinuclear antibody (ANA) is among the most frequently ordered tests in paediatric rheumatology setting. Diseases like systemic lupus erythematosus and Sjögren syndrome is closely related with a positive ANA and classified as ANA associated diseases. Besides, ANA test is ordered in patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) to assess the risk for uveitis and a positive ANA could be detected in children with nonrheumaticrheumatic conditions. In this study, we aimed to investigate frequency of positive ANA in paediatric rheumatology setting and the association of immunofluorescence staining patterns and titres of ANA with rheumatic diseases. METHODS: : Immunofluorescence staining patterns, and titres of the ANA and diagnoses of children who tested for ANA between January 2016 and December 2021 were retrospectively analysed. RESULTS: Among 2477 patients with ANA tested, 28.1% had a positive ANA result. Among them, 39.2% had a diagnosis of a rheumatic disease. Most common rheumatic diagnosis was JIA (43.8%) and ANA associated diseases were observed in 24.5% of the patients with a rheumatic diagnosis. While ANA associated diseases had significantly more frequent homogenous staining, dense fine speckled pattern was significantly more common in children with nonrheumatic diagnoses. Despite ANA associated diseases was found to be significantly associated with higher titres, no difference was observed between patients with JIA and nonrheumatic conditions. DISCUSSION: Our study showed that the majority of children with a positive ANA test were not diagnosed with a rheumatic disease. While titres and patterns of ANA were found to be important in diagnosis of rheumatic diseases, ordering ANA test with solid indications might give improved probability of rheumatic diagnoses in children with a positive test.

The Nuclear Dense Fine Speckled (DFS) Immunofluorescence Pattern: Not All Roads Lead to DFS70/LEDGFp75.

The monospecific dense fine speckled (DFS) immunofluorescence assay (IFA) pattern is considered a potential marker to aid in exclusion of antinuclear antibody (ANA)-associated rheumatic diseases (AARD). This pattern is typically produced by autoantibodies against transcription co-activator DFS70/LEDGFp75, which are frequently found in healthy individuals and patients with miscellaneous inflammatory conditions. In AARD patients, these antibodies usually co-exist with disease-associated ANAs. Previous studies reported the occurrence of monospecific autoantibodies that generate a DFS-like or pseudo-DFS IFA pattern but do not react with DFS70/LEDGFp75. We characterized this pattern using confocal microscopy and immunoblotting. The target antigen associated with this pattern partially co-localized with DFS70/LEDGFp75 and its interacting partners H3K36me2, an active chromatin marker, and MLL, a transcription factor, in HEp-2 cells, suggesting a role in transcription. Immunoblotting did not reveal a common protein band immunoreactive with antibodies producing the pseudo-DFS pattern, suggesting they may recognize diverse proteins or conformational epitopes. Given the subjectivity of the HEp-2 IFA test, the awareness of pseudo-DFS autoantibodies reinforces recommendations for confirmatory testing when reporting patient antibodies producing a putative DFS pattern in a clinical setting. Future studies should focus on defining the potential diagnostic utility of the pseudo-DFS pattern and its associated antigen(s).

Investigation of dense fine speckled pattern and anti-dense fine speckled 70 antibody by a single step assay.

The indirect immunofluorescence (IIF) method is the gold standard for identifying anti-nuclear antibodies (ANAs). It is recommended that ANA, including the dense fine speckled (DFS) pattern, should be verified with a highly specific confirmatory test after a sensitive screening test. Although methods such as ELISA and LIA are often used to confirm the presence of anti-DFS70 antibodies, new IIF methods have been developed in recent years to prevent the difficulties in the recognition of the DFS pattern and to carry out the confirmatory test in a single step. In this study, we evaluated CytoBead (Generic Assays, Germany) test, which contained both HEp-2 cell substrate and beads coated with DFS70 antigen in one well, in comparison to the routine two-step test strategy. Five hundred forty-one samples were studied by conventional IIF assay, LIA, and CytoBead assay; 264 samples were studied by ELISA. The Bead component of the CytoBead test was found to be reliable as a confirmational test when compared with ELISA and LIA (total agreement values were 85.6% and 87.6%, respectively). The CytoBead ANA DFS70 might be a promising test in the future, allowing both screening and confirmation in a single step, saving time and being easier than two-step testing.

Improved performance of confirmatory assays for detecting dense fine speckled (DFS) 70 antibodies.

The presence of monospecific dense fine speckled 70 (DFS70) pattern in indirect immunofluorescence assay (IFA) without concomitant systemic autoimmune related diseases (SARD)-associated antibodies could be an exclusion biomarker for SARD. Since interpretation of DFS pattern on IFA is subjective, an assay for confirming the presence of anti-DFS70 is required. We evaluated the performance of two commercial assays [fluorescence enzyme immunoassay (FEIA) and line immunoassay (LIA)] for detecting anti-DFS70. Sera with monospecific DFS (n=176) and without DFS (n=179) pattern from referred patients for ANA testing, in two independent laboratories and healthy donors, were investigated for anti-DFS70 by FEIA (Phadia EliA) and LIA (Euroimmun). The assay performance including sensitivity and specificity at different cut-offs was evaluated, and optimal cut-offs were determined. The newly established optimal cut-offs (2.7 U/mL on EliA, band intensity of 28 on LIA) showed significantly better assay performance in detecting anti-DFS70 and confirming monospecific DFS pattern. A relative sensitivity of 93.7% with relative specificity of 100% on EliA and a relative sensitivity of 96.6% with relative specificity of 95.3% on LIA were achieved. Superior Cohen's Kappa agreements with IFA were also achieved for both assays (0.936 for EliA and 0.906 for LIA). Application of an optimal cut-off can significantly increase the assay performance for anti-DFS70 and enhance the accuracy in reporting DFS pattern by IFA.

The Prevalence and Clinical Relevance of the DFS Immunofluorescence Staining Pattern in a Large ANA-Positive Cohort.

Background: Although the dense fine speckled (DFS) immunofluorescence staining pattern has been studied by various researchers in recent years, its clinical associations remain unspecified. Thus, we performed a retrospective study in a non-selective population to explore the prevalence of this enigmatic antinuclear antibody (ANA) pattern and to determine its possible clinical associations with any identifiable pathology. Methods: We retrieved the results of ANA testing ordered by various departments in 2019 to study the prevalence of DFS pattern. Demographic characteristics and clinical features of these participants were also collected from the electronic medical record system. Correlation analysis was made to study its clinical associations and a p-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: The prevalence of ANA positivity was 37.4% among 72,204 serum samples of which the median age was 44 (interquartile range: 31, 56) years old and 68.0% were women. The prevalence of the DFS staining pattern was 1.1% in the total population and accounted for 3.1% in the ANA-positive population. There were 97.6% of these cases displaying the DFS pattern with a low titer of ANA (≤1:320; starting serum dilution: 1:100). We found that this pattern correlated with several pathological conditions, such as skin disorders (25.1%), alopecia (4.6%), and obstetric complications (6.6%). Conclusion: The presence of the DFS immunofluorescence staining pattern may accompany several pathological conditions and may be a signal of localized inflammation within certain organs or tissues, especially the skin.

Dense fine speckled immunofluorescence pattern in a Chinese population: Prevalence and clinical association.

OBJECTIVE: To provide information on the prevalence and possible clinical association in a Chinese population for medical practice of the dense fine speckled pattern (DFS pattern). METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted with patients who had the DFS pattern from June 2018 to December 2019 in West China Hospital. RESULTS: A total of 469 patients (1.27% of patients with positive anti-nuclear antibody indirect immunofluorescence (ANA IIF) test results) revealed the DFS pattern, of which 92.96% had isolated DFS pattern and 23.67% had titers above/equal to 1:320. The average age of patients with the DFS pattern was 43.45 years, and females accounted for 76.97% of them. Ten different kinds of diseases made up the vast majority of the disease spectrum, in which inflammatory or infectious diseases (46.11%), mental diseases (21.45%), and systemic autoimmune rheumatic diseases (SARDs) (18.23%) ranked in the top three. The most common SARDs were rheumatoid arthritis (RA), undifferentiated connective tissue disease (UCTD), and systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Forty-six patients (10.55%) had positive or suspicious extractable nuclear antigen (ENA) antibodies test results and a higher risk of suffering from SARDs. Forty-seven patients would be missed if the DFS pattern with negative ENA antibodies test result was considered as exclusion criterion of SARDs. CONCLUSIONS: The DFS pattern is basically isolated and with low titer. It is unwise to exclude the diagnosis of SARDs only depending on the appearance of the DFS pattern. Autoimmune diseases-related antibodies, clinical information of patients, and long-term follow-up are of great importance to avoid missed or delayed diagnosis of SARDs.

Clinical Aspects of the Dense Fine Speckled Pattern in Indirect Immunofluorescence-Antinuclear Antibody Screening and Its Association with DFS70 Autoantibodies.

GOALS: The existence of anti-dense fine speckled (DFS) 70 autoantibodies are considered an exclusionary biomarker for systemic autoimmune rheumatic diseases (SARDs). Several tests to confirm the presence of anti-DFS70 autoantibodies have been introduced, and the use of them in specimens with a DFS pattern in indirect immunofluorescence-antinuclear antibody (IIF-ANA) testing has been suggested. However, these additional tests have only been evaluated in a small number of samples; their clinical usefulness therefore requires further evaluation. METHODS: A total of 213 serum specimens showing DFS (n=155) or homogeneous (H; n=58) patterns were included. All specimens were tested by western blotting (WB) and enzyme immunoassay (EIA). Clinical information regarding SARDs was analyzed. RESULTS: The detection rates for WB and EIA for anti-DFS70 autoantibodies in specimens with a DFS pattern were 86.5% and 73.5%, respectively. Detection rates in specimens with a low IIF-ANA titer were significantly lower than those in specimens with a high titer. The detection rate of anti-DFS70 autoantibodies in 58 specimens with an H pattern was 10.3% (6/58). Among 155 subjects with a DFS pattern in IIF-ANA staining, only five were diagnosed with SARD. CONCLUSIONS: There is little need to confirm the presence of anti-DFS70 autoantibodies using other methods. When a DFS pattern is observed in IIF-ANA staining, it is more important to confirm the presence of other autoantibodies related to SARDs than to identify anti-DFS70 autoantibodies. Finally, more careful interpretation of IIF-ANA to specimens with a low IIF-ANA titer is needed.