Characterizing barriers to care in migraine: multicountry results from the Chronic Migraine Epidemiology and Outcomes - International (CaMEO-I) study.

OBJECTIVE: To assess rates of traversing barriers to care to access optimal clinical outcomes in people with migraine internationally. BACKGROUND: People in need of medical care for migraine should consult a health care professional knowledgeable in migraine management, obtain an accurate diagnosis, and receive an individualized treatment plan, which includes scientific society guideline-recommended treatments where appropriate. METHODS: The Chronic Migraine Epidemiology and Outcomes-International (CaMEO-I) Study was a cross-sectional, web-based survey conducted from July 2021 through March 2022 in Canada, France, Germany, Japan, the United Kingdom, and the United States (US). Respondents who met modified International Classification of Headache Disorders, 3rd edition, criteria for migraine and had Migraine Disability Assessment Scale (MIDAS) scores of ≥ 6 (i.e., mild, moderate, or severe disability) were deemed to need medical care and were included in this analysis. Minimally effective treatment required that participants were currently consulting a health care professional for headache (barrier 1), reported an accurate diagnosis (barrier 2), and reported use of minimally appropriate pharmacologic treatment (barrier 3; based on American Headache Society 2021 Consensus Statement recommendations). Proportions of respondents who successfully traversed each barrier were calculated, and chi-square tests were used to assess overall difference among countries. RESULTS: Among 14,492 respondents with migraine, 8,330 had MIDAS scores of ≥ 6, were deemed in need of medical care, and were included in this analysis. Current headache consultation was reported by 35.1% (2926/8330) of respondents. Compared with the US, consultation rates and diagnosis rates were statistically significantly lower in all other countries except France where they were statistically significantly higher. Total appropriate treatment rates were also statistically significantly lower in all other countries compared with the US except France, which did not differ from the US. All 3 barriers were traversed by only 11.5% (955/8330) of respondents, with differences among countries (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Of people with migraine in need of medical care for migraine, less than 15% traverse all 3 barriers to care. Although rates of consultation, diagnosis, and treatment differed among countries, improvements are needed in all countries studied to reduce the global burden of migraine. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NA.

Treatment patterns of patients with migraine eligible for anti-CGRP pathway monoclonal antibodies.

Introduction: Migraine is a debilitating neurological disorder, with a wide range of symptoms and disease burden, underscoring the heterogeneity of patients' disease characteristics and treatment needs. To characterize the profile of migraine patients in the US who may be eligible for preventive treatment with an anti-CGRP pathway mAb and to better understand treatment patterns and real-world use of acute and preventive medications for migraine, we conducted a retrospective cohort study of adult patients. Methods: These patients were identified as having migraine using diagnosis codes or migraine-specific medication use (first = index) in the IQVIA PharMetrics® Plus database. Patients were required to have ≥ 12 months of continuous enrollment in medical and pharmacy benefits prior to index (baseline) and after index (follow-up). Patients were stratified into chronic migraine (CM) and non-chronic migraine (non-CM) by diagnosis codes. Based on acute migraine-specific medication dispensing data in the follow-up period, non-CM patients were divided into 3 cohorts: highest, middle, and lowest tertile of total units of dispensed acute migraine-specific medication (gepants, ditans, ergot derivatives, and triptans). Migraine medication use was captured in the baseline and follow-up periods. Results: A total of 22,584 CM and 216,807 non-CM patients (72,269 patients in each tertile) were identified and included in the study. Over the follow-up, CM patients had a mean of 70 units of acute migraine-specific medications dispensed, while the highest, middle, and lowest tertile of non-CM patients had a mean of 92, 29, and 10 units, respectively. Anti-calcitonin gene-related peptide pathway mAbs were dispensed for 28.9% of CM patients, and for 6.9%, 4.1%, and 2.9% of non-CM patients in the highest, middle, and lowest tertiles, respectively. Conclusion: A lower proportion of non-CM patients had use of anti-calcitonin gene-related peptide pathway mAbs compared to CM patients, confirming the unmet need with appropriate preventive medication. There appears to be a persistent gap in management of patients without a diagnosis of CM who are dispensed high quantities of acute migraine-specific medications.

[28-year-old male patient with headaches on the left side and facial pain]. / 28-jähriger Patient mit in den Kiefer ausstrahlenden ­Kopfschmerzen temporal links.

INTRODUCTION: A 28-year-old male suffers for two weeks from new-onset very severe headache located on his left temple radiating to his jaw. He also complains about left sided retroorbital pain and chewing aggravated symptoms. In addition, nausea and emesis in the mornings during the past six months were reported. Clinical examination revealed tender swelling over the left temple, but laboratory results showed no signs of inflammation, normal electrolytes, kidney and liver values. A CT-scan revealed a circumscriptive osteolytic lesion in the left os temporale.

Impact of Erenumab on Migraine Disability: A Three-Month MIDAS (Migraine Disability Assessment Scale) Score Analysis at Dubai Health Facilities.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Migraine is a prevalent neurological disorder causing recurrent headaches that significantly impact daily life. Erenumab, a calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) receptor antagonist, has emerged as a promising treatment for migraine. CGRP is thought to play a role in migraine pathophysiology, and erenumab works by blocking CGRP binding to its receptors. Erenumab has been found to be effective in reducing migraine frequency, with potential benefits for improving patient outcomes. This study investigated the impact of erenumab on migraine disability in patients treated at Dubai Health facilities. We specifically assessed changes in Migraine Disability Assessment Scale (MIDAS) scores before and after a three-month treatment period. METHODS: This retrospective analysis examined data from 26 patients diagnosed with migraine according to the established criteria. All patients received erenumab treatment for three months. MIDAS, a validated tool, was used to quantify migraine-related disability at baseline and after treatment completion. Due to potential skewness in the data distribution, the statistical analysis focused on the median change in MIDAS scores across groups based on gender and erenumab dosage. Non-parametric tests were employed to assess group differences. RESULTS: Erenumab treatment resulted in a median decrease of 13 points in MIDAS scores, suggesting a potential improvement in migraine disability at three months. Statistical analysis revealed no statistically significant group differences regarding MIDAS score changes between genders or erenumab dosage groups. However, trends toward improvement were observed in all subgroups. CONCLUSION: While not statistically significant due to the limited sample size and the absence of a control group, these findings suggest a potential benefit of erenumab in reducing migraine disability. Future research with more extensive, controlled trials is warranted to definitively assess erenumab's effectiveness and explore potential treatment regimen variations for optimal patient outcomes.

The burdens attributable to headache disorders in Cameroon: national estimates from a population-based door-to-door survey, including a headache-care needs assessment.

BACKGROUND: We have previously shown headache to be highly prevalent in Cameroon. Here we present the attributed burden. We also perform a headache-care needs assessment. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional survey among adults (18-65 years) in the general population. Multistage cluster-sampling in four regions (Centre, Littoral, West and Adamawa), home to almost half the country's population, generated a representative sample. We used the standardised methodology of the Global Campaign against Headache, including the HARDSHIP questionnaire, with diagnostic questions based on ICHD-3 and enquiries into symptom burden, impaired participation (lost productivity and disengagement from social activity), quality of life (QoL) using WHOQoL-8, and willingness to pay (WTP) for effective care. We defined headache care "need" in terms of likelihood of benefit, counting all those with probable medication-overuse headache (pMOH) or other headache on ≥ 15 days/month (H15 +), with migraine on ≥ 3 days/month, or with migraine or tension-type headache (TTH) and meeting either of two criteria: a) proportion of time in ictal state (pTIS) > 3.3% and intensity ≥ 2 (moderate-to-severe); or b) ≥ 3 lost days from paid and/or household work in the preceding 3 months. RESULTS: Among 3,100 participants, mean frequency of any headache was 6.7 days/month, mean duration 13.0 h and mean intensity 2.3 (moderate). Mean pTIS was 9.8%, which (with prevalence factored in) diluted to 6.1-7.4% of all time in the population. Most time was spent with H15 + (5.3% of all time), followed by TTH (1.0%) and migraine (0.8%). For all headache, mean lost days/3 months were 3.4 from paid work, 3.0 from household work and 0.6 from social/leisure activities, diluting to 2.5, 2.2 and 0.6 days/3 months in the population. QoL (no headache: 27.9/40) was adversely impacted by pMOH (25.0) and other H15 + (26.0) but not by migraine (28.0) or TTH (28.0). WTP (maximally XAF 4,462.40 [USD 7.65] per month) was not significantly different between headache types. An estimated 37.0% of adult Cameroonians need headache care. CONCLUSION: Headache disorders in Cameroon are not only prevalent but also associated with high attributed burden, with heavily impaired participation. Headache-care needs are very high, but so are the economic costs of not providing care.

Epidemiology of headache presentations to United States emergency departments from 2016 to 2023.

INTRODUCTION: Headaches are a common condition seen in the Emergency Department (ED), with numerous trials focused on improving care for these patients. However, there is limited recent large-scale, robust data available on the incidence, admission rates, evaluation, and treatment in the ED setting. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional study of ED presentations for headache from 1/1/2016 to 12/31/2023 using the Epic Cosmos national database. All ED visits with headache-relevant ICD-10 coding were included. Outcomes included percentage of total ED visits, admission rates, computed tomography (CT) brain imaging, lumbar puncture (LP) performance, and medication administration. Medications were analyzed by class (NSAIDs, acetaminophen, dopamine antagonists, diphenhydramine, opioids, intravenous fluids, caffeine, and magnesium sulfate). Subgroup analyses were performed by specific types of dopamine antagonists. RESULTS: Of 188,482,644 ED encounters, 6,007,090 (3.2%) were due to headache. Of these, 246,082 (4.1%) were admitted. Nearly half (46.6%) of patients received at least one CT. Rates of CT head without contrast increased from 38.2% to 47.9% over time, while rates of CT angiography rose from 2.8% to 10.2%. 1.4% of all patients received an LP, with rates decreasing from 1.8% to 1.1% over time. The most common medication was NSAIDs (45.3%), followed by dopamine antagonists (44.8%), diphenhydramine (38.1%), acetaminophen (24.8%), opioids (16.3%), magnesium sulfate (0.2%), and caffeine (0.1%). 50.8% of patients received intravenous fluids. Rates of opioids declined over time, while dopamine antagonists, acetaminophen, and intravenous fluid administration increased. CONCLUSION: Headaches represent a common reason for ED presentation, with approximately 4% of patients being admitted. Imaging is frequently performed, with rises in CT without contrast and CT angiography rates over time, while LP rates have been declining. NSAIDs remain the most common medication given, with opioids declining over time while non-opioid agents such as dopamine antagonists have increased. These findings can help inform health policy initiatives, such as those focused on radiologic imaging and evidence-based medication administration.

Rationale and Design for the BLOCK-SAH Study (Pterygopalatine Fossa Block as an Opioid-Sparing Treatment for Acute Headache in Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage): A Phase II, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blinded, Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial with a Sequential Parallel Comparison Design.

BACKGROUND: Acute post-subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) headaches are common and severe. Management strategies for post-SAH headaches are limited, with heavy reliance on opioids, and pain control is overall poor. Pterygopalatine fossa (PPF) nerve blocks have shown promising results in treatment of acute headache, including our preliminary and published experience with PPF-blocks for refractory post-SAH headache during hospitalization. The BLOCK-SAH trial was designed to assess the efficacy and safety of bilateral PPF-blocks in awake patients with severe headaches from aneurysmal SAH who require opioids for pain control and are able to verbalize pain scores. METHODS: BLOCK-SAH is a phase II, multicenter, randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled clinical trial using the sequential parallel comparison design (SPCD), followed by an open-label phase. RESULTS: Across 12 sites in the United States, 195 eligible study participants will be randomized into three groups to receive bilateral active or placebo PPF-injections for 2 consecutive days with periprocedural monitoring of intracranial arterial mean flow velocities with transcranial Doppler, according to SPCD (group 1: active block followed by placebo; group 2: placebo followed by active block; group 3: placebo followed by placebo). PPF-injections will be delivered under ultrasound guidance and will comprise 5-mL injectates of 20 mg of ropivacaine plus 4 mg of dexamethasone (active PPF-block) or saline solution (placebo PPF-injection). CONCLUSIONS: The trial has a primary efficacy end point (oral morphine equivalent/day use within 24 h after each PPF-injection), a primary safety end point (incidence of radiographic vasospasm at 48 h from first PPF-injection), and a primary tolerability end point (rate of acceptance of second PPF-injection following the first PPF-injection). BLOCK-SAH will inform the design of a phase III trial to establish the efficacy of PPF-block, accounting for different headache phenotypes.

What is the Status Quo of Patient-Centred Physiotherapy Management of People with Headache within a Biopsychosocial Model? - A Narrative Review.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Patient-centred care (PCC) is deemed essential in the rehabilitation of musculoskeletal pain. Integrating such care within a biopsychosocial framework, enables to address all facets of the individual pain experience, and to manage the individual instead of the condition. This narrative review describes the status quo of PCC physiotherapy management of people with headache within a biopsychosocial model. PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, Scopus were searched (update 07.05.2024). The search-query comprised terminology relating to "headache", "patient-centred", "biopsychosocial", "physiotherapy". Additional eligibility criteria were reviews, trials, cohort, case report, case-control studies in English, Dutch, French. RECENT FINDINGS: Gaps are exposed in patient-centred physiotherapy management of migraine, tension-type headache, and cervicogenic headache. While a biopsychosocial approach is advised to manage migraine and tension-type headache, its use in clinical practice is not reflected by the literature. A biopsychosocial approach is not advised in cervicogenic headache. Psychosocial-lifestyle interventions are mainly delivered by health-care providers other than physiotherapists. Additionally, psychologically-informed practice is barely introduced in physiotherapy headache management. Though, managing the social context within a biopsychosocial framework is advised, the implementation by physiotherapists is unclear. Comparable conclusions apply to PCC. PCC is recommended for the physiotherapy management of primary and secondary headache. Such recommendation remains however theoretical, not reaching clinical implementation. Yet, a shift from the traditional disease-centred model of care towards PCC is ongoing and should be continued in physiotherapy management. With this implementation, clinical and economical studies are needed to evaluate its effectiveness.

An interdisciplinary integrated specialized one-stop outpatient clinic for idiopathic intracranial hypertension-a comprehensive assessment of clinical outcome.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Management of idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH) is complex requiring multiple specialized disciplines. In practice, this creates considerable organizational and communicational challenges for healthcare professionals and patients. Thus, an interdisciplinary integrated outpatient clinic for IIH (comprising neurology, neuroophthalmology, neuroradiology, neurosurgery and endocrinology) was established with central coordination and a one-stop concept. Here, the aim was to evaluate the effects of this one-stop concept on objective clinical outcome. METHODS: In a retrospective cohort study, the one-stop era with integrated care (IC) (1 July 2021 to 31 December 2022) was compared to a reference group receiving standard care (SC) (1 July 2018 to 31 December 2019) regarding visual impairment/worsening and headache improvement/freedom 6 months after diagnosis. Multivariate binary logistic regression models were used to adjust for confounders. RESULTS: Baseline characteristics of the IC group (n = 85) and SC group (n = 81) were comparable (female 90.6% vs. 90.1%; mean age 33.6 vs. 32.8 years; median body mass index 31.8 vs. 33.0; median cerebrospinal fluid opening pressure 32 vs. 34 cmH2O; at diagnosis, visual impairment was present in 71.8% vs. 69.1% and chronic headache in 55.3% vs. 56.8% in IC vs. SC). IC was associated with a higher likelihood of achieving both headache improvement (odds ratio [OR] 2.24, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.52-4.33, p < 0.001) and headache freedom (OR 1.75, 95% CI 1.11-3.09, p = 0.031). Regarding the risk of visual impairment and visual worsening IC was superior numerically but not statistically significantly (OR 0.87, 95% CI 0.69-1.16, p = 0.231, and OR 0.67, 95% CI 0.41-1.25, p = 0.354). CONCLUSIONS: Interdisciplinary integrated care of IIH is favourably associated with headache outcomes and potentially also visual outcomes.

Association between the Composite Dietary Antioxidant Index and severe headache or migraine: results from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey.

Background: Severe headache or migraine is a neurological disease that seriously affects the quality of human life. Oxidative stress is considered a main factor in the pathogenesis of severe headache or migraine. The Composite Dietary Antioxidant Index (CDAI) is a score calculated using six dietary antioxidant components (including vitamins A, C, E, selenium, zinc, and carotenoid), which represents a person's level of dietary antioxidant ingredients. Based on the theory of oxidative stress, we speculated that CDAIs may be relevant to the risk of severe headache or migraine, as the relationship between the CDAI and severe headache or migraine is unclear. Hence, the purpose of this study was to explore the relationship between the CDAI and severe headache or migraine in participants. Methods: We performed a cross-sectional study using data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) that were collected from 2001 to 2004. A total of 4,943 participants were included, of whom 1,232 experienced severe headaches or migraines. Participants' CDAIs were calculated based on their intake of six dietary antioxidants. We used logistic regression models, limited cubic spline analysis, and subgroup analysis to assess the association of CDAI with severe headache or migraine. Results: The multivariate logistic regression model (correcting for all potential covariates) revealed that the odds ratio (95% Confidence Interval [CI]) for the association between CDAI and severe headache or migraine was 0.97 (95% CI = 0.95-1.00, p = 0.048). Compared with individuals with low CDAIs in Quartile (Q)1, the adjusted Odds Ratio between the CDAI and severe headache or migraine in Q2, Q3, and Q4 were 0.84 (95% CI = 0.69-1.01, p = 0.07), 0.77 (95% CI = 0.63-0.96, p = 0.017), and 0.73 (95% CI = 0.56-0.95, p = 0.02), respectively. Restricted cubic spline regression analysis showed an L-shaped relationship between the CDAI and severe headache or migraine. Conclusion: Our findings indicate that higher CDAI was associated with a lower risk of severe headache or migraine.

Incidence of post-dural lumbar puncture headache (PDLPH) in comparison between emergency and elective lower segment cesarean section (LSCS) with 26G Quincke-Babcock cutting-beveled spinal needle.

Background: C-section is usually performed under spinal anesthesia also known as a subarachnoid block (SAB) over general anesthesia. Because of the lesser amount of dose used, there is a lower risk of local anesthetic toxicity and minimal transfer of drugs to the fetus. Obstetric patients have a higher risk of having post-dural puncture headache (PDPH). PDPH occurs due to leakage of the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) through the hole created by a spinal needle. There are many elements affecting the frequency of PDPH, these elements can also consist of age, female sex, needle size, and types, pregnancy, preceding records of PDPH, median-paramedian distinction in approach, a puncture level. PDPH is commonly in the form of a frontal, occipital, or retro-orbital headache that starts in 12-72 h after the dural puncture and will increase when standing and decrease when lying down or resting. We aimed to learn about headache frequency between elective and emergency lower segment cesarean section using 26-G Quincke spinal needle in full-term pregnant patients. Objectives: To study the incidence of PDPH using the 26G Quincke spinal needle. To analyze the causal factors/determinants such as adequate preloading of fluids, size of spinal needle, number of pricks, and technique of lumbar puncture effects on the incidence of PDPH. Methodology: This study is a prospective questionnaire-based comparative observational study using the convenience sampling method. The patients were interviewed with a structured questionnaire at the Symbiosis University Hospital and Research Centre, Lavale, Pune. The patients observed for the study were between 20 and 40 of age group, posted for emergency or elective lower segment cesarean section, with body mass index (BMI) less than 14.5 to 24.9 and with ASA I and II grades. Patients with any comorbidities, recurrent headaches, obesity, and spine deformity were excluded. According to the review of the literature and with the help of a formula, the sample size was calculated as 20; 10 patients for elective LSCS, and 10 patients for emergency LSCS. Results: Out of 20 patients, 10 patients were posted for elective LSCS, and the rest 10 patients were for emergency LSCS under spinal anesthesia. The incidence of PDPH was found only in 2 out of 10 emergency LSCS patients, and no patients from elective LSCS cases showed up with the incidence of PDPH.

Patterns of migraine medication use in Norway: A nationwide registry-based observational study.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to describe and discuss patterns of migraine medication use in the entire Norwegian population. METHODS: In this nationwide, observational study, all individuals with a migraine-related prescription between 2010 and 2020 were identified using the Norwegian Prescription Database. The outcomes of interest were the incidence and 1-year prevalence of migraine medication users, as well as individuals with triptan overuse. Patterns of medication use were statistically compared between women and men adjusted for age, year of treatment start, comorbidities and county of residence calculating adjusted odds ratios (aOR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). RESULTS: We identified 327,904 migraine medication users. The incidence ranged from 0.39% to 0.46%, and the 1-year prevalence increased from 1.99% to 2.99%. Preventive use increased >50% during the study period. Preventives were significantly more often prescribed to women than to men (39.72% vs. 33.75%; aOR 1.41, 95% CI 1.38 to 1.44). Triptan overuse was significantly more common among women, but women with overuse were more often using preventives, as compared to men (56.64% vs 52.69%; aOR = 1.43, 95% CI 1.37 to 1.49). CONCLUSION: The prevalence of medically treated migraine is low. Overuse of triptans is frequent, especially among women. Clinicians should be encouraged to try out different triptans, recognize triptan overuse, and prescribe preventives when indicated.

The Glymphatic System and its Relationship to Migraine.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: We aim to critically review animal and human studies of the glymphatic system in migraine and propose a model for how the glymphatic system may function in migraine, based on the available evidence. RECENT FINDINGS: Early studies in animal models report migraine attacks temporarily disrupt glymphatic flow. Human imaging studies suggest chronic migraine may be associated with alterations in glymphatic system function, albeit with conflicting results. Presently, it remains unknown whether repetitive migraine attacks or frequent nights of insomnia impair glymphatic system function over time in those with migraine, and whether alterations in glymphatic function could contribute to worsening migraine disability or risk for cognitive disease. Longitudinal studies of glymphatic function in patients with migraine and insomnia, with inclusion of cognitive assessments, may be informative.

The use of acupuncture for addressing neurological and neuropsychiatric symptoms in patients with long COVID: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Importance: Acupuncture has been used to treat neurological and neuropsychiatric symptoms in China and other parts of the world. These symptoms, such as fatigue, headache, cognitive impairment, anxiety, depression, and insomnia, are common in people experiencing long COVID. Objective: This study aims to explore the feasibility of acupuncture in the treatment of neurological and neuropsychiatric symptoms in long COVID patients. Data Sources: A systematic search was conducted in four English and four Chinese databases from inception to 23 June 2023. Literature selection and data extraction were conducted by two pairs of independent reviewers. Study Selection: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that explored the effect of acupuncture on fatigue, depression, anxiety, cognitive abnormalities, headache, and insomnia were included. Data Extraction and Synthesis: RCTs that explored the effect of acupuncture on fatigue, depression, anxiety, cognitive abnormalities, headache, and insomnia were included. A meta-analysis was performed using R software. Heterogeneity was measured using I2. Subgroup analyses were performed focusing on the duration of treatment and acupuncture modalities. The systematic review protocol was registered on PROSPERO (registration number: CRD42022354940). Main outcomes and measures: Widely adopted clinical outcome scales included the Fatigue Scale for assessing fatigue, the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale for evaluating depression, the Mini-Mental State Examination for assessing cognitive impairment, the Visual Analog Scale for headache severity, and the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index for measuring insomnia. Results: A total of 110 RCTs were included in the systematic review and meta-analysis. Overall, acupuncture was found to improve the scores of the Fatigue Scale (vs. medication: mean differences (MD): -2.27, P < 0.01; vs. sham acupuncture: MD: -3.36, P < 0.01), the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (vs. medication: MD: -1.62, 95%, P < 0.01; vs. sham acupuncture: MD: -9.47, P < 0.01), the Mini-Mental State Examination (vs. medication: MD: 1.15, P < 0.01; vs. sham acupuncture: MD: 1.20, P < 0.01), the Visual Analog Scale (vs. medication: MD: -1.05, P < 0.01; vs. waitlist: MD: -0.48, P=0.04), and the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (vs. medication: MD: -2.33, P < 0.01; vs. sham acupuncture: MD: -4.19, P < 0.01). Conclusion and relevance: This systematic review suggested acupuncture as a potentially beneficial approach for the treatment of neurological and neuropsychiatric symptoms, as assessed using clinical scales, and it may have applicability in long COVID patients. Further well-designed clinical studies specifically targeting long COVID patients are needed to validate the role of acupuncture in alleviating long COVID symptoms. Systematic Review Registration: PROSPERO, identifier [CRD42022354940].

Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension as a Differential Diagnosis in Persistent Idiopathic Facial Pain: A Case Report.

Persistent idiopathic facial pain (PIFP), previously known as atypical facial pain (ATFP), is a chronic pain disorder with the characteristic of persistent, undulating pain in the face or the teeth without a known cause or any structural correlation. Women are more commonly affected than men. We report a case of a 38-year-old married female patient with a history of Crohn's disease who presented to the oral and maxillofacial surgery (OMFS) clinic with chronic dull bilateral facial pain and headache mainly affecting the right side of the face and neck without a known cause. She was initially diagnosed with PIFP due to a badly decayed right wisdom tooth. Wisdom teeth were extracted secondary to vague complaints of discomfort due to wisdom teeth; however, no significant improvement was noticed. Further investigations were carried out with new CT scans and magnetic resonance venography (MRV), which revealed evidence of having idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH), described as increased intracranial pressure with facial pain, headache, tinnitus, and papilledema. The patient was referred to neurology and received appropriate treatment. She began her treatment with topiramate, then transitioned to acetazolamide, underwent bilateral botulinum toxin (botox) injections into the temporal region, and underwent regular follow-up. The patient was significantly improved. Idiopathic intracranial hypertension must be ruled out in cases of PIFP that do not respond to ordinary treatment measures.

Does Preoperative Coffee Consumption Prevent Intraoperative Hypotension in Cesarean Section Surgeries?

OBJECTIVE: In this study, we evaluated the effects of a cup of coffee given to patients before surgery in a cesarean section by means of intraoperative hypotension, ephedrine requirement, and the incidence of post-dural puncture headache (PDPH). METHODS: A total of 140 patients undergoing elective cesarean section with spinal anesthesia were included in this study. Participants who drank a single cup of filtered coffee two hours before spinal anesthesia were included in the coffee group, and those who drank water were in the control group. In each group, 70 patients were included. Hemodynamic parameters were recorded every three to five minutes after spinal anesthesia. Intraoperative use of ephedrine was recorded. The PDPH was monitored for three days. RESULTS: The incidence of intraoperative hypotension was 48.6% in the coffee group and 71.4% in the control group (p = 0.006). The rate of ephedrine usage (25.7%) was significantly lower in the coffee group (p = 0.001). The incidence of PDPH in the first 24 hours (2.9%) was significantly lower in the coffee group (11.4%). The visual analog scale (VAS) score was similar between groups (p = 0.048, p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Consumption of a single cup of coffee before spinal anesthesia reduced the incidence of intraoperative hypotension and the rate of ephedrine usage in cesarean sections.

Disability in cluster headache is more than attack frequency - results from and validation of the English version of the Cluster Headache Impact Questionnaire (CHIQ).

BACKGROUND: Cluster headache (CH) is associated with high disability. The Cluster Headache Impact Questionnaire (CHIQ) is a short, disease-specific disability questionnaire first developed and validated in German. Here, we validated the English version of this questionnaire. METHODS: The CHIQ was assessed together with nonspecific headache-related disability questionnaires in CH patients from a tertiary headache center and an American self-help group. RESULTS: 155 active episodic and chronic CH patients were included. The CHIQ showed good internal consistency (Cronbach's α = 0.91) and test-retest reliability (ICC = 0.93, n = 44). Factor analysis identified a single factor. Convergent validity was shown by significant correlations with the Headache Impact Test™ (HIT-6™, ρ = 0.72, p < 0.001), the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS depression: ρ = 0.53, HADS anxiety: ρ = 0.61, both p < 0.001), the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS-10, ρ = 0.61, p < 0.001) and with CH attack frequency (ρ = 0.29, p < 0.001). Chronic CH patients showed the highest CHIQ scores (25.4 ± 7.9, n = 76), followed by active episodic CH and episodic CH patients in remission (active eCH: 22.2 ± 8.7, n = 79; eCH in remission: 14.1 ± 13.1, n = 127; p < 0.001). Furthermore, the CHIQ was graded into 5 levels from "no to low impact" to "extreme impact" based on the patients' perception. Higher CHIQ grading was associated with higher attack and acute medication frequency, HIT-6™, HADS and PSS scores. CONCLUSION: The English version of the CHIQ is a reliable, valid, and disease-specific patient-reported outcome measure to assess the impact of headaches on CH patients.

Centripetal endoscopic sinus surgery in rhinogenic headache.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this manuscript is to analyse a diagnostic protocol to select correctly patients with Rhinogenic Headache Contact Point (RH) and to investigate the effect of surgical treatment and medical therapy in pain relief. METHODS: A prospective no-randomized study selected adult patients with headache and nasal alteration at CT exam or endoscopic vision with positive response to test with nasal spray with corticosteroids and antihistamine or/and local anesthesia test to the contact points. MIDAS score, intensity score, daily duration of symptoms, frequency of headache in the last month were collected in patients who performed surgery and in patients who performed medical therapy. RESULTS: Following the inclusion, 415 patients were selected for this study. 302 patients performed nasal surgery (septoplasty, turbinoplasty and/or endoscopic surgery with centripetal technique), 113 performed medical therapy. There was a statistically significant improvement in MIDAS score, intensity score, daily duration of symptoms, frequency of headache in the last month in patients who performed surgery and in patients who performed medical therapy. Regarding the comparison between patients who performed surgery (Group A) and patients who performed only medical therapy for RH (Group B), better outcomes were obtained by Group A. Considering the daily life handicap index, the lowest handicap was obtained in Group A. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that surgery, using in some cases centripetal technique, gives an improvement statistically significant than medical therapy in RH. The use of nasal spray with corticosteroids and with anti-histamine is a good method in the diagnosis of RH, especially in patients with anatomical variants such as concha bullosa, agger nasi cells and Haller cells.

"It's just part of who I am " Living with chronic headache: voices from the CHESS trial, a qualitative study.

BACKGROUND: Between 2015 and 2019 the Chronic Headache Education and Self-management Study (CHESS) developed and tested a supportive self-management approach that aimed to improve outcomes for people with chronic migraine or chronic tension type headache with/without episodic migraine. However, a paucity of qualitative research which explored the lived experiences of people with chronic headache was evidenced. In response, we undertook to explore the experiences of living with chronic headaches of people who participated in the CHESS study. METHODS: We adopted qualitative methodologies, inviting participants in the CHESS study to participate in semi-structured interviews. In phase 1 (feasibility study), a thematic analysis was conducted. In phase 2 (main CHESS trial), interviews were informed by topic guides developed from our learning from the phase 1 interviews. Pen portrait methodology and thematic analysis was employed allowing us to explore the data longitudinally. RESULTS: Phase 1, 15 interviews (10 female) age range 29 to 69 years (median 47 years) revealed the complexities of living with chronic headache. Six overarching themes were identified including the emotional impact and the nature of their headaches. Phase 2, included 66 interviews (26 participants; median age group 50s (range 20s-60s); 20 females. 14 were interviewed at three points in time (baseline, 4 and 12 months) Through an iterative process four overlapping categories of headache impact emerged from the data and were agreed: i) 'I will not let headaches rule my life'; ii) 'Headaches rule my life'; iii) 'Headaches out of control-something needs to change'; and iv) 'Headaches controlled-not ruling my life'. One of these categories was assigned to each pen portrait at each timepoint. The remaining 12 participants were interviewed at two time points during a year; pen portraits were again produced. Analysis revealed that the headache impact categories developed above held true in this sample also providing some validation of the categories. CONCLUSIONS: These data give an insight into the complexities of living with chronic headache. Chronic headache is unpredictable, permeating all aspects of an individual's life; even when an individual feels that their headache is controlled and not interfering, this situation can rapidly change. It shows us that more work needs to be done both medically and societally to help people living with this often-hidden condition. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN79708100.

Artificial intelligence and headache.

BACKGROUND AND METHODS: In this narrative review, we introduce key artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) concepts, aimed at headache clinicians and researchers. Thereafter, we thoroughly review the use of AI in headache, based on a comprehensive literature search across PubMed, Embase and IEEExplore. Finally, we discuss limitations, as well as ethical and political perspectives. RESULTS: We identified six main research topics. First, natural language processing can be used to effectively extract and systematize unstructured headache research data, such as from electronic health records. Second, the most common application of ML is for classification of headache disorders, typically based on clinical record data, or neuroimaging data, with accuracies ranging from around 60% to well over 90%. Third, ML is used for prediction of headache disease trajectories. Fourth, ML shows promise in forecasting of headaches using self-reported data such as triggers and premonitory symptoms, data from wearable sensors and external data. Fifth and sixth, ML can be used for prediction of treatment responses and inference of treatment effects, respectively, aiming to optimize and individualize headache management. CONCLUSIONS: The potential uses of AI and ML in headache are broad, but, at present, many studies suffer from poor reporting and lack out-of-sample evaluation, and most models are not validated in a clinical setting.