Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 548
Filtrar
Más filtros

Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Front Vet Sci ; 11: 1466099, 2024.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39268520

RESUMEN

Novel variant infectious bursal disease virus (nvIBDV) is an emerging genotype (A2dB1b) that can cause severe and prolonged immunosuppression in young chickens. Despite current commercial vaccines being proven to lack complete protection against nvIBDV, it remains unclear whether the oil emulsion inactivated vaccines (OEVs) of the homologous and heterologous virus or booster immunization can provide effective protection. In this study, OEVs with two types of nvIBDV isolates QZ191002 (A-nv/B-nv) and YL160304 (A-nv/B-HLJ0504-like) were prepared and evaluated the protective effects of OEVs plus the booster immunizations with different current commercial vaccines against the challenge of nvIBDVs. The results from vaccination-challenge experiments showed that nvIBDV could break through the protection provided by only one immunization dose of the commercial vaccines, with the protection rates ranging from 40% to 60%. Interestingly, even with booster immunization with different commercial vaccines, the protection rates could only be increased to 60%-80%. As expected, only the OEVs of the homologous virus could provide 100% protection against the homologous nvIBDV, which could induce high-level specific antibodies, ameliorate target organ damage, and significantly reduce the viral load of the bursal in the challenged chickens. Notably, YL160304-OEV performed better than QZ191002-OEV, providing 100% protection not only against the challenge of homologous strain but also against that of heterologous QZ191002 strain. Antibody levels of the immunized chickens gradually increased after a short decline and reached the highest level on the age of 28 days. Similarly, the percentages of lymphocytes CD4+, CD8+ T, and B in peripheral blood lymphocytes (PBLs) were significantly increased on 21 d and 28 d. Notably, despite the nvIBDV, OEVs initially induced a delayed responses in the early stages but ultimately reach higher levels of CD4+ and CD8+ T lymphocytes. The results of study suggest that even booster immunization with different commercial vaccines cannot provide complete protection against nvIBDV, while the OEVs made by the nvIBDVs can provide full protection. Moreover, YL160304-OEV exhibits a broader protective spectrum against different nvIBDV strains, making it a potential candidate for the development of new vaccine.

2.
BMC Infect Dis ; 24(1): 935, 2024 Sep 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39251937

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Pregnancy is a critical time for women, making them more susceptible to infectious diseases like COVID-19. This study aims to determine the immunogenicity of COVID-19 in pregnant women who have been infected compared to those who have received the inactive COVID-19 vaccine. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study, pregnant women who received the inactivated COVID-19 vaccine (Sinopharm) and those with a history of COVID-19 infection during pregnancy were studied. Participants who had experienced stillbirth, received different COVID-19 vaccines, or had intrauterine fetal death were excluded from the study. Overall, the study included 140 participants. The participants were divided into two groups of 70 participants - pregnant women who received the Sinopharm vaccine and pregnant women who had COVID-19 infection during pregnancy. Before delivery, blood samples were collected from all mothers to evaluate the maternal immunoglobulin G (IgG) level. Blood samples were also taken from the baby's umbilical cord during delivery to measure the newborn's IgG level. Additionally, blood samples were collected from babies whose mothers showed signs of acute infection to measure their IgM levels and evaluate vertical transmission. FINDINGS: The study found a significant relationship between the mean level of maternal IgG and umbilical cord IgG within the groups (P < 0.001). The highest levels of maternal IgG (2.50 ± 2.17) and umbilical cord IgG (2.43 ± 2.09) were observed in pregnant women with a previous COVID-19 infection and no history of vaccination (P < 0.001). Only one baby was born with a positive IgM, and this baby was born to a mother who showed signs of COVID-19 infection in the last five days of pregnancy. The mother was 28 years old, with a BMI of 33; it was her first pregnancy, and she gave birth to a male newborn at term. CONCLUSION: Administering an inactivated vaccine during pregnancy can generate immunity in both the mother and the child. However, the vaccine's immunity level may not be as potent as that conferred by COVID-19 infection during pregnancy. Nonetheless, the risk of vertical transmission of COVID-19 is considered minimal and can be classified as negligible.


Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Antivirales , Vacunas contra la COVID-19 , COVID-19 , Inmunoglobulina G , Complicaciones Infecciosas del Embarazo , SARS-CoV-2 , Humanos , Embarazo , Femenino , COVID-19/inmunología , COVID-19/prevención & control , Vacunas contra la COVID-19/inmunología , Vacunas contra la COVID-19/administración & dosificación , Estudios Retrospectivos , Inmunoglobulina G/sangre , Adulto , Complicaciones Infecciosas del Embarazo/prevención & control , Complicaciones Infecciosas del Embarazo/inmunología , SARS-CoV-2/inmunología , Anticuerpos Antivirales/sangre , Vacunación , Transmisión Vertical de Enfermedad Infecciosa/prevención & control , Recién Nacido , Vacunas de Productos Inactivados/inmunología , Vacunas de Productos Inactivados/administración & dosificación , Mujeres Embarazadas , Inmunogenicidad Vacunal
3.
Biomedicines ; 12(9)2024 Sep 18.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39335628

RESUMEN

The safety of the mRNA and inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine has been demonstrated for people living with HIV (PLHIV). However, vaccine studies in PLHIV are limited, and there is a gap in which vaccine type provides the best response in PLHIV. Thus, PLHIV may benefit from mRNA vaccine types compared to inactivated vaccines. This study aims to assess the immune responses to vaccination by measuring specific antibodies (IgG) targeting the receptor binding sites (RBDs) of the SARS-CoV-2 virus and the levels of IL-2 and IFN-γ in plasma. A total of 41 PLHIV who regularly take antiretroviral therapy (ART) over a period of six months, along with 31 individuals in a healthy control group (HC), were administered either two mRNA or inactivated vaccines. Data regarding demographics and clinical information were gathered from the medical records. An analysis was conducted on the neutralisation antibody IgG specific to RBD using the chemiluminescence microparticle assay (CMIA). The levels of IL-2 and IFN-γ were quantified using the Luminex assay method from plasma samples. Data were collected in the laboratory 28 days after each vaccination. After the first vaccination, the level of anti-SARS-CoV-2 RBD IgG was higher in PLHIV who received the mRNA vaccines than those who received inactivated vaccines (p = 0.006). The levels of mRNA in the PLHIV group showed a significant correlation with IL-2 and IFN-γ after the second vaccination (r = 0.51, p = 0.0035; r = 0.68, p = 0.002). The group of PLHIV who received the inactivated vaccine showed increased IL-2 and IFN-γ after the initial vaccination, compared to PLHIV who received the mRNA vaccine (p = 0.04; p = 0.08). Administering a two-dose vaccination is essential to increase the levels of neutralising antibodies significantly (p = 0.013) in PLHIV who have received inactivated vaccines; further study is needed to make this a recommendation. The responses observed after vaccination in PLHIV were not affected by their CD4 cell counts. PLHIV showed higher levels of SARS-CoV-2 IgG and increased IL-2 and IFN-γ levels. Our study encourages SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in PLHIV regardless of its CD4 cell counts. Furthermore, the mRNA vaccine may give robust high antibody responses in PLHIV.

4.
Pathogens ; 13(9)2024 Aug 28.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39338920

RESUMEN

Caseous lymphadenitis (CLA) is a chronic and subclinical bacterial disease of ruminants caused by Corynebacterium pseudotuberculosis (C. pseudotuberculosis) infection. Until 2014, there were no reports of CLA outbreaks in South Korea; however, the prevalence of CLA cases has steadily increased. In this study, we used recently obtained field isolates to develop the first inactivated CLA vaccine in South Korea and evaluated it in various animal models. The inactivated vaccine was evaluated for virulence and effectiveness. Mice were tested for virulence and immunization challenges, and guinea pigs and Korean Native Black Goats (KNBGs) evaluated various vaccine concentrations to determine the optimal dose and effectiveness. In the case of KNBGs, clinical symptoms were not observed after vaccination. In addition, CLA-specific IgG was detected at a significantly (p < 0.05) high level and was maintained. In histopathological evaluations, inflammation was predominantly observed in the prefemoral lymph nodes in the non-vaccinated+CHAL group. The genetic diversity of C. pseudotuberculosis, which has become widespread in South Korea, is less than 0.5% our vaccine is expected to prevent infection by a wide range of strains effectively. In summary, our CLA vaccine can potentially prevent CLA and foster the growth of South Korea's domestic KNBG industry.

5.
BMC Infect Dis ; 24(1): 991, 2024 Sep 17.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39289630

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: To estimate vaccine effectiveness(VE) against COVID-19-related hospitalization for inactivated vaccines during the Omicron BF.7-predominant epidemic wave in Beijing, China. METHODS: We recruited a cohort in Beijing on 17 and 18 December 2022, collected status of vaccination and COVID-19-related hospitalization since 1 November 2022 and prospectively followed until 9 January 2023. A Poisson regression model was used to estimate the VE. RESULTS: 16(1.15%) COVID-19-related hospitalizations were reported in 1391 unvaccinated participants; 7(0.25%) in 2765 participants with two doses, resulting in a VE of 70.89%(95% confidence interval[CI] 26.25 to 87.73); 32(0.27%) in 11,846 participants with three doses, with a VE of 65.25%(95% CI 32.24 to 81.83). The VE of three doses remained above 64% at 1 year or more since the last dose. Elderly people aged ≥ 60 years had the highest hospitalization incidence(0.66%), VE for two doses was 74.11%(95%CI: - 18.42 to 94.34) and VE for three doses was 80.98%(95%CI:52.83 to 92.33). We estimated that vaccination had averted 65,007(95%CI: 12,817 to 97,757) COVID-19-related hospitalizations among people aged ≥ 60 years during the BF.7-predominant period in Beijing. CONCLUSION: Inactivated COVID-19 vaccines were effective against COVID-19-related hospitalization, especially for the elderly population who have increased risk of severe disease owing to SARS-CoV-2 infection.


Asunto(s)
Vacunas contra la COVID-19 , COVID-19 , Hospitalización , SARS-CoV-2 , Eficacia de las Vacunas , Vacunas de Productos Inactivados , Humanos , COVID-19/prevención & control , COVID-19/epidemiología , Vacunas contra la COVID-19/administración & dosificación , Vacunas contra la COVID-19/inmunología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Femenino , Adulto , Anciano , Vacunas de Productos Inactivados/administración & dosificación , Vacunas de Productos Inactivados/inmunología , SARS-CoV-2/inmunología , Beijing/epidemiología , Adulto Joven , Estudios de Cohortes , Adolescente , Vacunación/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios Prospectivos , China/epidemiología , Niño , Anciano de 80 o más Años
6.
Microbiol Spectr ; : e0111724, 2024 Sep 17.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39287459

RESUMEN

It remains unclear how previous infections and vaccinations influenced and shaped heterogeneous immune responses against Omicron and its variants in diverse populations in China. After the national wave of Omicron in early 2023, we evaluated serum levels of neutralizing antibodies (nAbs) against Omicron (B.1.1.529) and its variants (BA.5, BF.7, and CH1.1) in 33 COVID-19 convalescents and 40 uninfected vaccinees, using vesicular stomatitis virus-based pseudovirus neutralizing assay. In addition, we followed 34 Delta convalescent patients to compare their immune responses against Omicron before (late 2021) and after the Omicron wave (early 2023). NAbs at the acute phase of the disease were investigated in 50 Omicron inpatients, including 24 vaccinated and 26 unvaccinated patients. Among them, nasal mucosal IgA levels were measured in 42 subjects. Compared to vaccination, breakthrough infections significantly increased the breadth and magnitude of serum nAbs and mucosal IgA levels against Omicron variants. Exposure to Omicron but not Delta elicited stronger pan-Omicron responses. In Omicron inpatients, nAbs continued to rise as vaccination doses increased. However, in both vaccinees and convalescents, a fourth dose vaccination did not elicit higher nAbs against Omicron. Furthermore, nAbs against Omicron variants lasted longer than nAbs against WT SARS-CoV-2. Breakthrough infections of Omicron variants elicited specific immune responses against Omicron compared to vaccination and Delta infection. Although repeated vaccination revealed limited impacts on serum nAbs, populations at high risk of hospitalization may still benefit from continued vaccination.IMPORTANCEThe study described the specific humoral immunity against Omicron and its variants (BA.5, BF.7, and CH1.1) in diverse populations, including Delta-positive convalescent patients, Omicron-infected patients with a previous or current confirmed Delta infection, Omicron-positive patients, and healthy controls. In addition, we followed Delta convalescents for 1 year to evaluate the effect of a booster vaccine, breakthrough infection, and reinfection. Nasal mucosal IgA levels against SARS-CoV-2 were also examined. The findings of this study demonstrated the varied responses of individuals in different states following the outbreak of Omicron, highlighting the potential advantages of ongoing immunization for groups that are more vulnerable and have a greater likelihood of being hospitalized.

7.
Fish Shellfish Immunol ; 153: 109841, 2024 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39173984

RESUMEN

Largemouth bass virus (LMBV) infections has resulted in high mortality and economic losses to the global largemouth bass industry and has seriously restricted the healthy development of the bass aquaculture industry. There are currently no antiviral therapies available for the control of this disease. In this study, we developed three types of vaccine against LMBV; whole virus inactivated vaccine (I), a subunit vaccine composed of the major viral capsid protein MCP (S) as well as an MCP DNA vaccine(D), These were employed using differing immunization and booster strategies spaced 2 weeks apart as follows: II, SS, DD and DS. We found that all vaccine groups induced humoral and cellular immune responses and protected largemouth bass from a lethal LMBV challenge to varying degrees and DD produced the best overall effect. Specifically, the levels of specific IgM in serum in all immunized groups were elevated and significantly higher than those in the control group. Moreover, the expression of humoral immunity (CD4 and IgM) and cellular immunity (MHCI-α) as well as cytokines (IL-1ß) was increased, and the activity of immunity-related enzymes ACP, AKP, LZM, and T-SOD in the serum was significantly enhanced. In addition, the relative percent survival of fish following an LMBV lethal challenge 4 weeks after the initial immunizations were high for each group: DD(89.5 %),DS(63.2 %),SS(50 %) and II (44.7 %). These results indicated that the MCP DNA vaccine is the most suitable and promising vaccine candidate for the effective control of LMBV disease.


Asunto(s)
Lubina , Infecciones por Virus ADN , Enfermedades de los Peces , Vacunas de ADN , Vacunas Virales , Animales , Vacunas de ADN/inmunología , Vacunas de ADN/administración & dosificación , Enfermedades de los Peces/prevención & control , Enfermedades de los Peces/inmunología , Lubina/inmunología , Vacunas Virales/inmunología , Vacunas Virales/administración & dosificación , Infecciones por Virus ADN/veterinaria , Infecciones por Virus ADN/prevención & control , Infecciones por Virus ADN/inmunología , Vacunas de Productos Inactivados/inmunología , Vacunas de Productos Inactivados/administración & dosificación , Inmunidad Humoral , Ranavirus/inmunología , Vacunas de Subunidad/inmunología , Vacunas de Subunidad/administración & dosificación , Inmunidad Celular
8.
Vaccine ; 42(23): 126241, 2024 Oct 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39178768

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The annual administration of the influenza vaccine is the most effective method for preventing influenza. We have evaluated the effectiveness of the inactivated influenza vaccine in children aged 6 months to 15 years across the seasons from 2013/2014 to 2022/2023. This study aims to investigate the effectiveness of the inactivated influenza vaccine in the 2023/2024 season, the first year following the easing of strict COVID-19 measures, and possibly the last season when only the inactivated vaccine is available on the market. METHODS: Adjusted vaccine effectiveness for the 2023/2024 season was assessed using a test-negative case-control design, with results based on polymerase chain reaction and rapid influenza diagnostic tests. Vaccine effectiveness was calculated by influenza type and patient hospitalization/outpatient status. RESULTS: A total of 1832 children were recruited. The inactivated influenza vaccine was effective in preventing both symptomatic influenza A and B in both inpatient and outpatient settings. Overall vaccine effectiveness for influenza A was 51% (95% confidence interval [CI], 23%-69%, n = 930) in inpatient settings and 54% (95%CI, 27%-71%, n = 559) in outpatient settings. For influenza B, effectiveness was 60% (95%CI, 22%-79%, n = 859) in inpatient settings and 56% (95%CI, 26%-74%, n = 558) in outpatient settings. Analysis suggested that administering two doses enhanced effectiveness specifically against influenza B. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study to demonstrate influenza vaccine effectiveness in children after the relaxation of strict COVID-19 measures in Japan (2023/2024). We recommend the current inactivated vaccine for preventing both influenza A and B in children, with consideration for the potential use of two doses to enhance effectiveness against influenza B.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Vacunas contra la Influenza , Gripe Humana , Eficacia de las Vacunas , Vacunas de Productos Inactivados , Humanos , Vacunas contra la Influenza/inmunología , Vacunas contra la Influenza/administración & dosificación , Niño , Gripe Humana/prevención & control , Gripe Humana/inmunología , COVID-19/prevención & control , COVID-19/inmunología , COVID-19/epidemiología , Preescolar , Vacunas de Productos Inactivados/inmunología , Vacunas de Productos Inactivados/administración & dosificación , Masculino , Adolescente , Femenino , Lactante , Estudios de Casos y Controles , SARS-CoV-2/inmunología , Virus de la Influenza B/inmunología , Estaciones del Año , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Vacunación/métodos
9.
Heliyon ; 10(15): e35425, 2024 Aug 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39165927

RESUMEN

Background: This retrospective analysis aims to investigate the clinical characteristics of students infected with the SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant in three Beijing schools. Additionally, we explore the dynamic trends of nucleic acid cycle threshold values (Ct values) and serum antibody titers throughout the disease course. Methods: Demographic, clinical, nucleic acid Ct values, and antibody titer data were collected from cases in a COVID-19 cluster in Beijing Ditan Hospital, Capital Medical University, spanning from September 6 to October 1, 2022. Results: A total of 107 students infected with Omicron (BA.5.2 and BA.2.76) were identified across three schools. Primary clinical manifestations included fever and upper respiratory symptoms (85/107, 79.4 %), with the majority being classified as mild cases (96/107, 89.7 %). Notably, middle school students in the second school exhibited a higher peak body temperature compared to college students in the first and third schools (39.5 °C vs. 38.4 °C, adjusted P = 0.005; 39.5 °C vs. 38.6 °C, adjusted P = 0.002). Analysis of dynamic changes in Ct values revealed the lowest median Ct value in nasopharyngeal swabs on the third day of illness, reaching 35 after 9-11 days. Oropharyngeal swab nucleic acid median Ct value reached 35 approximately 3-5 days post-onset. Serum antibody detection showed continuous negativity of IgM antibody titers from days 1-10, while IgG antibody titers were positive on the first day and increased rapidly after one week. Conclusions: The three COVID-19 cluster school outbreaks primarily resulted from Omicron infections, with no severe or fatal cases observed. Clinically, the selection of different types of SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acid swabs for virus detection can be tailored based on the infection's course.

10.
mSphere ; 9(9): e0038024, 2024 Sep 25.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39189780

RESUMEN

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) vaccination is crucial for protecting vulnerable individuals, yet individuals with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) often exhibit impaired vaccine responses. Emerging evidence suggests that the composition of the host microbiota, crucial in immune regulation and development, influences vaccine efficacy. This study aimed to characterize the relationships between the SARS-CoV-2 inactivated vaccine and the host microbiota (specifically, gut and lung microbiota) of C57BL/6 mice with T2DM. Employing 16S rRNA metagenomic sequencing and ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry, we observed lower alpha diversity and distinct beta diversity in fecal microbiota before vaccination and in gut microbiota 28 days post-vaccination between T2DM mice and healthy mice. Compared with healthy mice, T2DM mice showed a higher Firmicutes/Bacteroidetes ratio 28 days post-vaccination. Significant alterations in gut microbiota composition were detected following vaccination, while lung microbiota remained unchanged. T2DM was associated with a diminished initial IgG antibody response against the spike protein, which subsequently normalized after 28 days. Notably, the initial IgG response positively correlated with fecal microbiota alpha diversity pre-vaccination. Furthermore, after 28 days, increased relative abundance of gut probiotics (Bifidobacterium and Lactobacillus) and higher levels of the gut bacterial tryptophan metabolite, indole acrylic acid, were positively associated with IgG levels. These findings suggest a potential link between vaccine efficacy and gut microbiota composition. Nonetheless, further research is warranted to elucidate the precise mechanisms underlying the impact of the gut microbiome on vaccine response. Overall, this study enhances our understanding of the intricate relationships among host microbiota, SARS-CoV-2 vaccination, and T2DM, with potential implications for improving vaccine efficacy. IMPORTANCE: Over 7 million deaths attributed to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) by 6 May 2024 underscore the urgent need for effective vaccination strategies. However, individuals with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) have been identified as particularly vulnerable and display compromised immune responses to vaccines. Concurrently, increasing evidence suggests that the composition and diversity of gut microbiota, crucial regulators of immune function, may influence the efficacy of vaccines. Against this backdrop, our study explores the complex interplay among SARS-CoV-2 inactivated vaccination, T2DM, and host microbiota. We discover that T2DM compromises the initial immune response to the SARS-CoV-2 inactivated vaccine, and this response is positively correlated with specific features of the gut microbiota, such as alpha diversity. We also demonstrate that the vaccination itself induces alterations in the composition and structure of the gut microbiota. These findings illuminate potential links between the gut microbiota and vaccine efficacy in individuals with T2DM, offering valuable insights that could enhance vaccine responses in this high-risk population.


Asunto(s)
Vacunas contra la COVID-19 , COVID-19 , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2 , Heces , Microbioma Gastrointestinal , Ratones Endogámicos C57BL , SARS-CoV-2 , Vacunas de Productos Inactivados , Animales , Ratones , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/inmunología , Vacunas de Productos Inactivados/inmunología , COVID-19/prevención & control , COVID-19/inmunología , SARS-CoV-2/inmunología , Heces/microbiología , Vacunas contra la COVID-19/inmunología , Inmunoglobulina G/sangre , ARN Ribosómico 16S/genética , Pulmón/microbiología , Pulmón/inmunología , Femenino , Masculino , Probióticos/administración & dosificación , Anticuerpos Antivirales/sangre , Eficacia de las Vacunas
11.
Vaccines (Basel) ; 12(8)2024 Jul 26.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39203971

RESUMEN

Senecavirus A (SVA) is a picornavirus that is endemic in swine, causing a vesicular disease clinically indistinguishable from other vesicular diseases, like foot-and-mouth disease. The widespread viral circulation, constant evolution, and economic losses caused to the swine industry emphasize the need for measures to control the agent. In this study, we evaluated the immunogenicity of a whole-virus-inactivated vaccine using a representative contemporary Brazilian SVA strain in Balb/ByJ mice. The animals were vaccinated with two doses by an intramuscular route. The humoral response induced by the vaccination was evaluated by an in-house ELISA assay for IgG detection. The cellular response was assessed by flow cytometry after in vitro SVA stimulation in splenocyte cultures from vaccinated and non-vaccinated groups. Protection against SVA was assessed in the experimental groups following an oral challenge with the homologous virus. The vaccination induced high levels of IgG antibodies and the proliferation of CD45R/B220+sIgM+, CD3e+CD69+, and CD3e+CD4+CD44+CD62L- cells. These results indicate the immunogenicity and safety of the vaccine formulation in a murine model and the induction of humoral and cellular response against SVA.

12.
Vaccine ; 42(25): 126114, 2024 Nov 14.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39019656

RESUMEN

We aimed to characterise vaccine-induced protection against COVID-19 during five waves caused by Variants of Concern (VOCs). This is a nested case-control study of 3,972 HCW primarily vaccinated with CoronaVac (98%) that evaluated symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 breakthrough infections (BI) in almost two-years follow-up until the 3rd Omicron wave. Predictors of protection against SARS-CoV-2 BI were analysed using conditional logistic regression models. We included 1,491 SARS-CoV-2 breakthrough cases, mostly mild, and 2,962 controls. Most participants (90%) had received at least one booster before the onset of the Omicron waves, mainly BNT162b2. A multivariate logistic regression showed that vaccine-induced protection against BI wanes after six months regardless of the number of monovalent booster doses. Additionally, booster dose with BNT162b2 showed a trend for higher protection compared to CoronaVac during the Omicron waves. In conclusion, immunity of monovalent booster doses against SARS-CoV-2 is short-lasting. Individuals previously vaccinated with an inactivated vaccine should receive a BNT162B2 booster dose.


Asunto(s)
Vacuna BNT162 , Vacunas contra la COVID-19 , COVID-19 , Personal de Salud , Inmunización Secundaria , SARS-CoV-2 , Humanos , COVID-19/prevención & control , COVID-19/inmunología , Masculino , Personal de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Vacunas contra la COVID-19/inmunología , Vacunas contra la COVID-19/administración & dosificación , SARS-CoV-2/inmunología , Adulto , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Vacuna BNT162/inmunología , Vacuna BNT162/administración & dosificación , Vacunación , Anciano , Infección Irruptiva , Vacunas de Productos Inactivados
13.
Antiviral Res ; 229: 105954, 2024 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38964615

RESUMEN

Selecting appropriate adjuvants is crucial for developing an effective vaccine. However, studies on the immune responses triggered by different adjuvants in COVID-19 inactivated vaccines are scarce. Herein, we evaluated the efficacy of Alum, CpG HP021, Alum combined with CpG HP021 (Alum/CpG), or MF-59 adjuvants with COVID-19 inactivated vaccines in K18-hACE2 mice, and compared the different immune responses between K18-hACE2 and BALB/c mice. In K18-hACE2 mice, the Alum/CpG group produced a 6.5-fold increase in anti-receptor-binding domain (RBD) IgG antibody titers compared to the Alum group, and generated a comparable level of antibodies even when the antigen amount was reduced by two-thirds, possibly due to the significant activation of germinal center (GC) structures in the central region of the spleen. Different adjuvants induced a variety of binding antibody isotypes. CpG HP021 and Alum/CpG were biased towards Th1/IgG2c, while Alum and MF-59 were biased toward Th2/IgG1. Cytokines IFN-γ, IL-2, and TNF-α were significantly increased in the culture supernatants of splenocytes specifically stimulated in the Alum/CpG group. The antibody responses in BALB/c mice were similar to those in K18-hACE2 mice, but with lower levels of neutralizing antibodies (NAbs). Notably, the Alum/CpG-adjuvanted inactivated vaccine induced a higher number of T cells secreting IFN-γ and IL-2, increased the percentage of effector memory T (TEM) cells among CD8+ T cells, and effectively protected K18-hACE2 mice from Delta variant challenge. Our results showed that Alum/CpG complex adjuvant significantly enhanced the immune response to inactivated COVID-19 antigens and could induce a long-lasting immune response.


Asunto(s)
Adyuvantes Inmunológicos , Adyuvantes de Vacunas , Compuestos de Alumbre , Anticuerpos Antivirales , Vacunas contra la COVID-19 , COVID-19 , Inmunoglobulina G , Ratones Endogámicos BALB C , SARS-CoV-2 , Animales , Vacunas contra la COVID-19/inmunología , Vacunas contra la COVID-19/administración & dosificación , Ratones , Adyuvantes Inmunológicos/administración & dosificación , Compuestos de Alumbre/administración & dosificación , Anticuerpos Antivirales/sangre , Anticuerpos Antivirales/inmunología , COVID-19/prevención & control , COVID-19/inmunología , SARS-CoV-2/inmunología , Inmunoglobulina G/sangre , Inmunoglobulina G/inmunología , Adyuvantes de Vacunas/administración & dosificación , Femenino , Anticuerpos Neutralizantes/sangre , Anticuerpos Neutralizantes/inmunología , Vacunas de Productos Inactivados/inmunología , Vacunas de Productos Inactivados/administración & dosificación , Glicoproteína de la Espiga del Coronavirus/inmunología , Citocinas/inmunología , Humanos
14.
Vaccines (Basel) ; 12(7)2024 Jun 25.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39066347

RESUMEN

Acquired hemophilia A (AHA) is a rare bleeding disorder (1.4 per million inhabitants per year) caused by neutralizing antibodies against factor VIII. Although uncommon, these autoantibodies can cause a high rate of morbidity and mortality. Several conditions are linked with AHA; based on an EACH2 study, 3.8% of AHA could be connected to infection. In the last four years, most humans have contracted the SARS-CoV-2 infection or have been vaccinated against it. Whether or not COVID-19 immunization might induce AHA remains controversial. This review aims to evaluate the evidence about this possible association. Overall, 18 manuscripts (2 case series and 16 case reports) were included. The anti-SARS-CoV-2 vaccination, as also happens with other vaccines, may stimulate an autoimmune response. However, older individuals with various comorbidities are both at risk of developing AHA and of COVID-19-related morbidity and mortality. Therefore, the COVID-19 vaccine must always be administered because the benefits still outweigh the risks. Yet, we should consider the rare possibility that the activation of an immunological response through vaccination may result in AHA. Detailed registries and prospective studies would be necessary to analyze this post-vaccine acquired bleeding disorder, looking for possible markers and underlying risk factors for developing the disease in association with vaccination.

15.
Front Immunol ; 15: 1407826, 2024.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38903523

RESUMEN

Background: We aimed to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and immunogenicity of a SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccine (Omicron BA.5) LVRNA012 given as the booster in immunized but SARS-CoV-2 infection-free adults in China. Methods: This is a single-center, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 clinical trial enrolling healthy adult participants (≥18 years) who had completed two or three doses of inactivated COVID-19 vaccines at least 6 months before, in Bengbu, Anhui province, China. Eligible participants were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive a booster intramuscular vaccination with an LVRNA012 vaccine (100ug) or placebo. The primary endpoint was the protective efficacy of a booster dose of the LVRNA012 vaccine or placebo against symptomatic COVID-19 of any severity 14 days after vaccination. Laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 infections were identified from 14 days to 180 days after intervention, with active surveillance for symptomatic illness 8 times per month between 7 to 90 days and at least once per month between 90 to 180 days after intervention. Results: 2615 participants were recruited and randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to either the vaccine group (1308) or the placebo group (1307). A total of 141 individuals (46 in the LVRNA012 group and 95 in the placebo group) developed symptomatic COVID-19 infection 14 days after the booster immunization, showing a vaccine efficacy of 51.9% (95% CI, 31.3% to 66.4%). Most infections were detected 90 days after intervention during a period when XBB was prevalent in the community. Adverse reactions were reported by 64% of participants after the LVRNA012 vaccination, but most of them were mild or moderate. The booster vaccination with the LVRNA012 mRNA vaccine could significantly enhance neutralizing antibody titers against the Omicron variant XBB.1.5 (GMT 132.3 [99.8, 175.4]) than did those in the placebo group (GMT 12.5 [8.4, 18.7]) at day 14 for the previously immunized individuals. Conclusion: The LVRNA012 mRNA vaccine is immunogenic, and shows robust efficacy in preventing COVID-19 during the omicron-predominate period. Clinical trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier NCT05745545.


Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Antivirales , Vacunas contra la COVID-19 , COVID-19 , Inmunización Secundaria , Inmunogenicidad Vacunal , SARS-CoV-2 , Humanos , Vacunas contra la COVID-19/inmunología , Vacunas contra la COVID-19/efectos adversos , Vacunas contra la COVID-19/administración & dosificación , Masculino , Femenino , COVID-19/prevención & control , COVID-19/inmunología , Adulto , Método Doble Ciego , SARS-CoV-2/inmunología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anticuerpos Antivirales/sangre , Anticuerpos Antivirales/inmunología , Vacunas de ARNm , Eficacia de las Vacunas , Adulto Joven , China , Anticuerpos Neutralizantes/sangre , Anticuerpos Neutralizantes/inmunología , Vacunas Sintéticas/inmunología , Vacunas Sintéticas/efectos adversos , Vacunas Sintéticas/administración & dosificación
16.
BMC Vet Res ; 20(1): 267, 2024 Jun 20.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38902724

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Scale drop disease virus (SDDV) threatens Asian seabass (Lates calcarifer) aquaculture production by causing scale drop disease (SDD) in Asian seabass. Research on the development of SDDV vaccines is missing an in-depth examination of long-term immunity and the immune reactions it provokes. This study investigated the long-term immune protection and responses elicited by an SDDV vaccine. The research evaluated the effectiveness of a formalin-inactivated SDDV vaccine (SDDV-FIV) using both prime and prime-booster vaccination strategies in Asian seabass. Three groups were used: control (unvaccinated), single-vaccination (prime only), and booster (prime and booster). SDDV-FIV was administered via intraperitoneal route, with a booster dose given 28 days post-initial vaccination. RESULTS: The immune responses in vaccinated fish (single and booster groups) showed that SDDV-FIV triggered both SDDV-specific IgM and total IgM production. SDDV-specific IgM levels were evident until 28 days post-vaccination (dpv) in the single vaccination group, while an elevated antibody response was maintained in the booster group until 70 dpv. The expression of immune-related genes (dcst, mhc2a1, cd4, ighm, cd8, il8, ifng, and mx) in the head kidney and peripheral blood lymphocytes (PBLs) of vaccinated and challenged fish were significantly upregulated within 1-3 dpv and post-SDDV challenge. Fish were challenged with SDDV at 42 dpv (challenge 1) and 70 dpv (challenge 2). In the first challenge, the group that received booster vaccinations demonstrated notably higher survival rates than the control group (60% versus 20%, P < 0.05). However, in the second challenge, while there was an observable trend towards improved survival rates for the booster group compared to controls (42% versus 25%), these differences did not reach statistical significance (P > 0.05). These findings suggest that the SDDV-FIV vaccine effectively stimulates both humoral and cellular immune responses against SDDV. Booster vaccination enhances this response and improves survival rates up to 42 dpv. CONCLUSIONS: This research provides valuable insights into the development of efficient SDDV vaccines and aids in advancing strategies for immune modulation to enhance disease management in the aquaculture of Asian seabass.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedades de los Peces , Inmunización Secundaria , Vacunas de Productos Inactivados , Vacunas Virales , Animales , Enfermedades de los Peces/prevención & control , Enfermedades de los Peces/inmunología , Enfermedades de los Peces/virología , Vacunas Virales/inmunología , Vacunas Virales/administración & dosificación , Vacunas de Productos Inactivados/inmunología , Vacunas de Productos Inactivados/administración & dosificación , Inmunización Secundaria/veterinaria , Iridoviridae/inmunología , Infecciones por Virus ADN/veterinaria , Infecciones por Virus ADN/prevención & control , Infecciones por Virus ADN/inmunología , Formaldehído , Anticuerpos Antivirales/sangre , Vacunación/veterinaria , Inmunoglobulina M/sangre , Perciformes/inmunología , Lubina/inmunología
17.
Vaccines (Basel) ; 12(6)2024 Jun 19.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38932413

RESUMEN

An outbreak of camelpox occurred in the Mangistau region of Kazakhstan in 2019. To control the outbreak of camelpox and to prevent its further spread to other regions, camels were vaccinated using live and inactivated camelpox vaccines produced in Kazakhstan. To evaluate the efficacy of these camelpox vaccines in the field, vaccine trials used 172 camels on camel farms in the Beineu district. Of these, 132 camels were vaccinated using a live attenuated camelpox vaccine and 40 camels were vaccinated using an inactivated vaccine to observe immunogenicity and safety. The live vaccine was inoculated into camels by scarification at a dose of 5 × 104 EID50, and the inactivated vaccine was injected intramuscularly at 5 mL twice, with an interval of 35 days. During the safety evaluation, camels administered either vaccine displayed no clinical signs of illness or any adverse effects. Post-vaccination seroconversion demonstrated that the live attenuated vaccine started to elicit antibody responses in some animals as early as day seven, while, by day 28, 99% of vaccinated camels responded. For camels immunized with the inactivated vaccine, seroconversion began on day 21 at low titers ranging from 1:2 to 1:4. Ninety days post vaccination, 77% of the camels demonstrated an immune response that was up to a titer of 1:16. The antibody response waned six months post vaccination in camels vaccinated with two types of vaccine. Nonetheless, both vaccines were 100% effective at preventing clinical disease in vaccinated camels during the camelpox outbreak. All unvaccinated camels became ill, with manifestations of clinical signs characteristic of camelpox. Following these successful field trials in Kazakhstan, a vaccination program for camels, to control camelpox using the domestically produced live attenuated camelpox vaccine, has started.

18.
Vaccines (Basel) ; 12(6)2024 Jun 19.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38932409

RESUMEN

Red seabream iridovirus (RSIV) is a major cause of marine fish mortality in Korea, with no effective vaccine available since its first occurrence in the 1990s. This study evaluated the efficacy of a formalin-killed vaccine against RSIV in rock bream under laboratory and field conditions. For the field trial, a total of 103,200 rock bream from two commercial marine cage-cultured farms in Southern Korea were vaccinated. Farm A vaccinated 31,100 fish in July 2020 and monitored them for 18 weeks, while farm B vaccinated 30,700 fish in August 2020 and monitored them for 12 weeks. At farm A, where there was no RSIV infection, the vaccine efficacy was assessed in the lab, showing a relative percentage of survival (RPS) ranging from 40% to 80%. At farm B, where natural RSIV infections occurred, cumulative mortality rates were 36.43% in the vaccinated group and 80.32% in the control group, resulting in an RPS of 54.67%. The RSIV-infectious status and neutralizing antibody titers in serum mirrored the cumulative mortality results. This study demonstrates that the formalin-killed vaccine effectively prevents RSIV in cage-cultured rock bream under both laboratory and field conditions.

19.
Fish Shellfish Immunol ; 151: 109691, 2024 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38871138

RESUMEN

Viral hemorrhagic septicemia virus (VHSV) poses a significant threat to the aquaculture industry, prompting the need for effective preventive measures. Here, we developed an inactivated VHSV and revealed the molecular mechanisms underlying the host's protective response against VHSV. The vaccine was created by treating VHSV with 0.05 % formalin at 16 °C for 48 h, which was determined to be the most effective inactivation method. Compared with nonvaccinated fish, vaccinated fish exhibited a remarkable increase in survival rate (99 %) and elevated levels of serum neutralizing antibodies, indicating strong immunization. To investigate the gene changes induced by vaccination, RNA sequencing was performed on spleen samples from control and vaccinated fish 14 days after vaccination. The analysis revealed 893 differentially expressed genes (DEGs), with notable up-regulation of immune-related genes such as annexin A1a, coxsackievirus and adenovirus receptor homolog, V-set domain-containing T-cell activation inhibitor 1-like, and heat shock protein 90 alpha class A member 1 tandem duplicate 2, indicating a vigorous innate immune response. Furthermore, KEGG enrichment analysis highlighted significant enrichment of DEGs in processes related to antigen processing and presentation, necroptosis, and viral carcinogenesis. GO enrichment analysis further revealed enrichment of DEGs related to the regulation of type I interferon (IFN) production, type I IFN production, and negative regulation of viral processes. Moreover, protein-protein interaction network analysis identified central hub genes, including IRF3 and HSP90AA1.2, suggesting their crucial roles in coordinating the immune response elicited by the vaccine. These findings not only confirm the effectiveness of our vaccine formulation but also offer valuable insights into the underlying immunological mechanisms, which can be valuable for future vaccine development and disease management in the aquaculture industry.


Asunto(s)
Lubina , Enfermedades de los Peces , Septicemia Hemorrágica Viral , Novirhabdovirus , Vacunas de Productos Inactivados , Vacunas Virales , Animales , Novirhabdovirus/inmunología , Vacunas Virales/inmunología , Vacunas Virales/administración & dosificación , Vacunas de Productos Inactivados/inmunología , Vacunas de Productos Inactivados/administración & dosificación , Septicemia Hemorrágica Viral/prevención & control , Septicemia Hemorrágica Viral/inmunología , Lubina/inmunología , Enfermedades de los Peces/inmunología , Enfermedades de los Peces/prevención & control , Inmunidad Innata , Genotipo , Vacunación/veterinaria , Inmunización/veterinaria
20.
Acta Med Philipp ; 58(7): 41-53, 2024.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38882914

RESUMEN

Objectives: The World Health Organization recently revised their recommendations and considered healthy children and adolescents as low priority group for COVID-19 vaccine. This review comprehensively assessed existing clinical evidence on COVID-19 vaccine in 12-17 years old. Methods: Included in this review were any type of study that investigated the efficacy, immunogenicity, safety, and effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccine on protection against SARS-COV-2 infection in 12-17 years old. Various electronic databases were searched up to March 15, 2023. Studies were screened, data extracted, risk of bias appraised, and certainty of evidence was judged using GRADE. Review Manager 5.4 was used to estimate pooled effects. Difference between the two groups was described as mean difference for continuous variables and as relative risk or odds ratio for categorical variables. Results: There were six randomized controlled trials and 16 effectiveness studies (8 cohorts and 8 case control). Low certainty evidence showed that BNT162b2 (Pfizer) was effective, immunogenic, and safe in healthy adolescents. There were 15 effectiveness studies on BNT162b2 (Pfizer) in healthy adolescent and one on immunocompromised patients. It was protective against infection with any of the variants, with higher protection against Delta than Omicron. BNT162b2 is protective against hospitalization and emergency and urgent care (high certainty); and critical care and MIS-C (low). Very low certainty evidence noted that BNT 162b2 was also immunogenic in 12-21 years old with rheumatic diseases while on immunomodulatory treatment but with possible increased exacerbation of illness. Low certainty evidence demonstrated that mRNA-1273 (Moderna) was effective, immunogenic, and safe. Low to very low certainty evidence were noted on the safety and immunogenicity of two vector base vaccines (ChAdOx1-19 and Ad5 vector COVID vaccine) and two inactivated vaccines (CoronaVac and BBIBP CorV). CONCLUSION: There is presently low certainty evidence on the use of RNA vaccines in 12-17 years old. The recommendation on its use is weak. There is presently insufficient evidence for the use of inactivated and vector-based COVID-19 vaccines. Different countries should consider whether to vaccinate healthy adolescent without comprising the other recommended immunization and health priorities that are crucial for this age group. Other factors including cost-effectiveness of vaccination and disease burden should be accounted.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA