Novel framework for determining TPS-calculated doses corresponding to detector locations using 3D camera inin vivosurface dosimetry.

Purpose. To address the shortcomings of current procedures for evaluating the measured-to-planned dose agreement inin vivodosimetry (IVD), this study aimed to develop an accurate and efficient novel framework to identify the detector location placed on a patient's skin surface using a 3D camera and determine the planned dose at the same anatomical position corresponding to the detector location.Methods. Breast cancer treatment was simulated using an anthropomorphic adult female phantom (ATOM 702D; CIRS, Norfolk, VA, USA). An optically stimulated luminescent dosimeter was used for surface dose measurements (MyOSLchip, RadPro International GmbH, Germany) at six IVD points. Three-dimensional surface imaging (3DSI) of the phantom with the detector was performed in the treatment position using a 3D camera. The developed framework, iSMART, was designed to import 3DSI and treatment planning data for determining the position of the IVD detectors in the 3D treatment planning DICOM image. The clinical usefulness of iSMART was evaluated in terms of accuracy and efficiency, for comparison with the results obtained using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) image guidance.Results. The relative dose difference between the planned doses determined using iSMART and CBCT images displayed similar accuracies (within approximately ±2.0%) at all detector locations. The relative dose differences between the planned and measured doses at the six detector locations ranged from -4.8% to 3.1% for the CBCT images and -3.5% to 2.1% for iSMART. The total time required to read the planned doses at six detector locations averaged at 8.1 and 0.8 min for the CBCT images and iSMART, respectively.Conclusions. The proposed framework can improve the robustness of IVD analyses and aid in accurate and efficient evaluations of the measured-to-planned dose agreement.

Clinical Application Study of Semi-cylindrical Beam Spoiler for Radiation Treatment of Early-stage Glottic Cancer Patients.

BACKGROUND/AIM: The purpose of this study was to determine whether a semi-cylindrical beam spoiler (sCBS) developed herein effectively increases the skin dose in patients with early-stage glottic cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We measured the surface doses for 26 patients who used the sCBS during treatment of early-stage glottic cancer through a parallel-opposed lateral two-field 6 MV photon beam. Measurements were performed by attaching optically stimulated luminescent dosimeters to the left, right, anterior (in-field), inferior, and superior (out-field) sides of the patient. RESULTS: The measured results were 81.8±2.1% (left), 81.0±1.7% (right), and 76.8±2.7% (anterior) in the in-field region compared to prescription doses, with 5.7±1.7% (superior) and 2.7±0.7% (inferior) in the out-field region. CONCLUSION: sCBS can deliver a suitably ideal surface dose for treatment of early-stage glottic cancer.

Oblique Surface Dose Calculation in High-Energy X-ray Therapy.

During radiation therapy, incident radiation oblique to the skin surface is high and may cause severe skin damage. Understanding the dose of radiation absorbed by the skin is important for predicting skin damage due to radiation. In this study, we used a high-energy (4 MV) X-ray system and an optically stimulated luminescence dosimeter (OSLD) that was developed for personal exposure dosimetry. We determined the dose variation and angular dependence, which are the characteristics of a small OSLD required to derive the calculation formula for the oblique surface dose. The dose variation was determined using the coefficient of variation. The maximum coefficient of variation for 66 small-field OSLDs was 1.71%. The angular dependence, obtained from the dose ratio of the dosimeter in the vertical direction, had a maximum value of 1.37. We derived a new equation in which the oblique surface dose can be calculated within the error range of -7.7-5.1%.

Dosimetric measurement of scattered radiation for simulated head and neck radiotherapy with homemade oral phantom.

During radiotherapy for head and neck tumours, the oral cavity and cheek area would be inevitably exposed to high energy radiation; thus, the material surface of the teeth, dental restorations with high atomic number, or alloy prosthodontics would generate backscatter electrons that cause the buccal mucosa adjacent to these materials to receive localized high dose enhancement, which primarily leads to side effects or oral mucositis. Based on the size of the adult oral cavity, this study aimed to use acrylic resin to create an oral phantom with two grooves on the left and right sides for placement of three molars. Moreover, the distance between the inner cheek and the side surface of the teeth could be accurately adjusted every 1 mm from 0 to 5 mm. This enhanced the dose in the buccal mucosa during head and neck radiotherapy and made the distribution measurement of the radiation dose simple and feasible at different depths (0-5 mm). Meanwhile, the study employed the film type optically stimulated luminescent dosimeter with a thickness of 0.3 mm to measure the absorbed dose inside the buccal mucosa to reduce the dose interference from radiotherapy. The study fixed three real molars in a row located at the left side of the phantom and employed 6 MV photons and intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) to treat and simulate oral cancer and measure the attenuation of the molar's backscatter dose from 0 to 5 mm in an up beam direction. The result showed that, in every 3 mm, the phantom had attenuated the enhancement of backscatter dose <3%. The irradiation dose enhancement in a single direction was twice higher than that through IMRT 7 field treatment. These measurement results were consistent with the results of previous studies.

Evaluation of surface dose and image quality using the half-scan mode in chest computed tomography-guided interventional radiology: a phantom study.

The authors aimed to evaluate the effects of the half-scan mode on image quality and physician exposure to radiation in computed tomography (CT)-guided interventional radiology (IVR) to the right lung using an intermittent CT fluoroscopy technique for measuring phantom surface dose distribution and image noise. For the half-scan mode, settings at 0°, 90°, 180°, and 270° were used as the central axis of the X-ray exposure range on the chest phantom. With the center of the ventral side in the chest phantom defined as 0°, optically stimulated luminescent dosimeters were attached at five positions at 30° intervals on the right side of the phantom surface. Securing a space for device operation during the procedure is necessary. The couch was shifted downward by 50 mm to reproduce the conditions used for measurement in clinical settings. Image noise and contrast-to-noise ratio were measured to assess image quality; subjective evaluation was performed using simulated lung nodules placed in the phantom. The phantom surface dose distribution in the measured half-scan mode depended on the angle setting. Additionally, the phantom surface dose in the half-scan mode at the 90° setting was reduced by approximately 50%; however, image quality was clearly decreased. In CT-guided IVR to the right lung, using a lead drape and half-scan mode according to the procedural situation is important.

Verification of Treatment Planning Algorithms Using Optically Stimulated Luminescent Dosimeters in a Breast Phantom.

AIM: The aim of this study is to measure and compare the surface dose of treated breast and contralateral breast with the treatment planning system (TPS) calculated dose using calibrated optically stimulated luminescent dosimeter (OSLD) in an indigenous wax breast phantom. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Three-dimensional conformal plans were generated in eclipse TPS v. 13 to treat the left breast of a wax phantom for a prescribed dose of 200 cGy. The plans were calculated using anisotropic analytical algorithm (AAA) and Acuros algorithm with 1-mm grid size. Calibrated OSLDs were used to measure the surface dose of treated and contralateral breasts. RESULTS: Large differences were observed between measured and expected doses when OSLDs were read in "reading mode" compared to the "hardware mode." The consistency in the responses of OSLDs was better (deviation <±5%) in the "hardware mode." Reasonable agreement between TPS dose and measured dose was found in regions inside the treatment field of treated breast using OSLDs for both algorithms. OSLD measured doses and TPS doses, for the points where the angle of incidence was almost normal, were in good agreement compared to all other locations where the angle of incidence varied from 45° to 70°. The maximum deviation between measured doses and calculated doses with AAA and with Acuros were 2.2% and-12.38%, respectively, for planning target volume breast, and 76% and 77.51%, respectively, for the opposite breast. CONCLUSION: An independent calibration factor is required before using the OSLDs for in vivo dose measurements. With reference to measured doses using OSLD, the accuracy of skin dose estimation of TPS with AAA was better than with Acuros for both the breasts. In general, a reasonable agreement between TPS doses calculated using AAA and measured doses exists in regions inside treatment field, but unacceptable differences were observed for the points lateral to the opposite breast for both AAA and Acuros.

Selecting passive dosimetry technologies for measuring the external dose of terrestrial wildlife.

Dosimeters attached to wild animals can be used to validate regulatory assessment approaches and models for estimating radiation exposure of wild animals. Such measurements are also necessary to ensure that robust dose-effect relationships can be developed from the results of field research programmes. This paper presents the first comprehensive evaluation of the different dosimetry technologies available for specifically measuring the external exposure of wildlife. Guidance is provided on the selection of appropriate passive dosimetry approaches for directly measuring external exposure of terrestrial wildlife under field conditions. The characteristics and performance of four available dosimetry technologies (thermoluminescent dosimeter (TLD), optically stimulated luminescent dosimeter (OSLD), radiophotoluminescent dosimeter (RPLD) and direct ion storage, (DIS)) are reviewed. Dosimeter properties, detection limit and dose range, study organisms and the intended application are variables that need to be considered when selecting a suitable dosimetry technology. Evaluated against these criteria, it is suggested that LiF based and Al2O3:C TLDs, OSLD and RPLD could all be used to estimate doses to wildlife. However, only LiF based TLDs have been used to directly measure wildlife doses in field studies to date. DIS is only suitable for comparatively large species (e.g. medium to large mammals), but has the advantage that temporal variation in dose can be recorded. In all cases, dosimeter calibration is required to ensure that the dose measurements reported can be interpreted appropriately for the organisms of interest.