Cosmetic and functional impact of fascia lata harvest for use in surgery for stress urinary incontinence.

INTRODUCTION: There has been increased interest in using autologous tissues since the Food and Drug Administration banned transvaginal mesh for pelvic organ prolapse in 2019. Our study aims to assess patients' perspective of functional and cosmetic impact on the fascia lata harvest site in patients undergoing fascia lata harvest for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence (SUI). METHODS: This is a prospective survey study of a retrospective cohort of patients who underwent a fascia lata pubovaginal sling between 2017 and 2022. Participants completed a survey regarding the functional and cosmetic outcomes of the harvest site. RESULTS: Seventy-two patients met the inclusion criteria. Twenty-nine patients completed the survey for a completion rate of 40.3%. For functional symptoms, 24.1% (7/29) of patients reported leg discomfort, 10.3% (3/29) reported leg weakness, 10.3% (3/29) reported a bulge, 17.2% (5/29) reported scar pain, 14.8% (4/27) reported scar numbness, and 17.2% (5/29) reported paresthesia at the scar. For cosmetic outcomes, 72.4% (21/29) reported an excellent or good scar appearance. On the PGI-I, 75.9% (22/29) reported their condition as very much better (48.3%, 14/29) or much better (27.6%, 8/29). CONCLUSIONS: The majority of patients reported being satisfied with the functional and cosmetic outcomes of their harvest site as well as satisfied with the improvement in their SUI. Less than 25% of patients report harvest site symptoms, including leg weakness, scar bulging, scar pain, scar numbness, or paresthesia in the scar. This is important in the context of appropriate preoperative discussion and counseling regarding fascia lata harvest.

Autologous Slings in Female Stress Urinary Incontinence Treatment: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of autologous fascial slings (AFS) compared with other surgical methods for female stress urinary incontinence (SUI) treatment. METHODS: The search was performed on studies published before September 2023 to identify articles assessing the effectiveness and safety of AFS compared with other surgical methods in female SUI. Inclusion criteria were randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and adult women with SUI. Exclusion criteria were other urinary incontinence types, combined pharmacological treatment, pregnancy, and lactation. This systematic review was conducted according to the Population, Intervention, Comparison, and Outcome framework, Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses 2020 checklist, and was registered in the Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews. RESULTS: Twenty RCTs were included in the systematic review and 10 RCTs in the meta-analysis. Comparison between AFS and synthetic midurethral slings (SMUS) did not show any statistically significant differences in the cure rate, frequency of urinary retention, or self-catheterization. SMUS showed more long-term postoperative complications (RR = 0.12, 95% CI: 0.03 to 0.50, p = 0.004), AFS had more in de novo urgency cases: (RR = 2.84, 95% CI: 1.13 to 7.10, p = 0.03). Operation time of SMUS was lower: (RR = 2.87, 95% CI: 2.56 to 3.19, p < 0.00001, I2 = 97%). SMUS showed significantly lower hospital stay duration: (RR = 1.92, 95% CI: 1.44 to 2.41, p < 0.00001). CONCLUSIONS: In this systematic review and meta-analysis, autologous slings demonstrated the same efficacy in comparison with SMUS in the management of SUI in women. AFS showed lower incidence of long-term postoperative complications. SMUS demonstrated lower operation time, hospital stay and de novo urgency.

Surgical Treatments for Women with Stress Urinary Incontinence: A Systematic Review.

Stress urinary incontinence affects a large proportion of women in their lifetime. The objective of this review was to describe and compare the latest surgical trends in urinary incontinence and focus on the literature advantages, disadvantages, complications and efficacy of surgical procedures regarding this pathology. Using network meta-analysis, we have identified the most frequently used procedures (Burch surgery, midurethral sling and pubovaginal sling), and we have described and characterized them in terms of effectiveness and safety. Midurethral procedures remain the gold standard for surgical treatment of stress urinary incontinence, although the potential of serious complications following this procedure should be taken into consideration always. There is a clear need for a much more unified evaluation of possible complications and postoperative evolution. This process will help practitioners to adapt and individualize their strategy for each patient.

Autologous pubovaginal sling for recurrent stress urinary incontinence after two or more failed synthetic midurethral sling.

OBJECTIVE: To determine efficacy and safety of salvage autologous pubovaginal sling (PVS) placement after a two or more failed synthetic midurethral sling. METHODS: Women undergoing autologous PVS placement for two or more failed synthetic MUS between 2008 and 2019 were identified. Those patients were conducted a follow-up examination. Outcomes of surgery were assessed using the cough stress test with a full bladder and symptom questionnaire, including Incontinence Visual Analogue Scale (I-VAS) and Incontinence Quality of Life (I-QOL) questionnaire. Surgical results were categorized into three classes: cured, improved, and failed. Secondary measures included patients' recommendation of autologous fascial sling (AFS). RESULTS: A total of 18 eligible patients met the criteria, of whom median age at surgery was 67 (52-74) years with a median follow-up of 80 (12-144) months. Preoperatively, all patients were identified by urodynamic test with Valsalva leak point pressure (VLPP) < 60 cmH2O. All patients had concomitant part sling excision combined with urethrolysis at the salvage operation. At the follow-up examination, sixteen in eighteen (88.89%) patients were cured and improved. The postoperative total score and each individual domain in I-QOL improved significantly compared with the baseline (p < 0.001). Postoperative I-VAS was significantly lower than preoperative (1.3 ± 0.6 vs. 7.8 ± 2.2, p < 0.001). A total of 16 patients (88.89%) recommended the AFS to others. Neither perioperative blood transfusions nor other complications above Clavien level 3 were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Our study indicates that autologous PVS is effective and safe in women with recurrent stress urinary incontinence after two or more failed synthetic MUS.

Impact of the availability of midurethral slings on treatment strategies for stress urinary incontinence: a cost-effectiveness analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To perform a cost-effectiveness analysis for the surgical and non-surgical management of stress urinary incontinence (SUI) with and without the availability of midurethral sling. DESIGN: Cost-effectiveness analysis. SETTING: USA, 2019. POPULATION: Women with stress urinary incontinence. METHODS: We modelled SUI treatment pathways with and without the availability of midurethral slings, including no treatment, incontinence pessary, pelvic floor muscle physical therapy, urethral bulking injection, open and laparoscopic Burch colposuspension, and pubovaginal autologous sling. Time horizon was 2 years after initial treatment. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Costs (2019 US$) included index surgery, surgical retreatment, and complications including urinary retention, de novo urgency and mesh exposure. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was calculated for non-dominated treatment strategies. RESULTS: The least costly treatment strategies were incontinence pessary, pelvic floor physical therapy, no treatment and midurethral sling, respectively. Midurethral slings had the highest effectiveness. The strategy with the lowest effectiveness was no treatment. The three cost-effective strategies included pessary, pelvic floor muscle physical therapy and midurethral slings. No other surgical options were cost-effective. If midurethral slings were not available, all other surgical options were still dominated by pelvic floor muscle physical therapy. Multiple one-way sensitivity analyses confirmed model robustness. The only reasonable threshold in which outcomes would change, was if urethral bulking costs decreased 12.6%. CONCLUSIONS: The midurethral sling is the most effective SUI treatment and the only cost-effective surgical option. TWEETABLE ABSTRACT: Midurethral sling is the only cost-effective surgical treatment option for stress urinary incontinence.

Current Overview of Surgical Options for Female Stress Urinary Incontinence.

Stress urinary incontinence (SUI) is a highly prevalent health condition that significantly impacts the quality of life. Traditional methods of treatment for SUI, such as pubovaginal sling and Burch colposuspension, have been replaced by the midurethral sling because of its high efficacy, low complication and morbidity rates, and short learning curve. Although multiple behavioral and operative treatments exist, midurethral slings are the gold standard for the treatment of SUI in women. However, several reports have raised concerns about complications caused by the synthetic mesh used in midurethral slings. Therefore, surgical treatment for SUI in women must be chosen with care, taking into account potential complications. Herein, we review the current safety issues pertaining to the use of meshes, the efficacy of traditional surgeries, old and new midurethral slings, and recent data comparing the efficacy and safety of different surgical options. This review is aimed at developing practical guidelines for choosing surgical options for women with SUI.

A comparative study of autologous rectus fascia pubovaginal sling surgery and synthetic transobturator vaginal tape procedure in treatment of women with urodynamic stress urinary incontinence.

OBJECTIVE: To compare short term results of autologous rectus fascia pubovaginal sling surgery with synthetic transobturator vaginal tape procedure in treatment of female stress urinary incontinence (SUI) STUDY DESIGN: It was a comparative study on 30 women between 25-65 years of age with urodynamic proven SUI who were randomly allocated to autologous rectus fascia pubovaginal sling surgery (Group I)(15 women) and synthetic transobturator vaginal tape procedure (Group II) (15 women). Preoperative and postoperative ICIQ (International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire) score, urodynamic study and serum CRP and IL-6 were done in all cases. RESULTS: The baseline characteristics in terms of age, body mass index (BMI), parity, mean ICIQ score and mean preoperative CRP and IL-6 levels were similar in two groups. Mean operative time was significantly longer (55.60 ± 5.77 vs 25.27 ± 4.32 minutes, p = 0.001) in group I than group II. Mean hospital stay of 7.1 ± 1.2 vs 1.2 ± 0.4 days, mean duration of catheterization 5.8 vs 1.2 day (<0.01) and postoperative urinary retention requiring recathterization were all significantly higher in group I than II. Wound infection was more in group I than in group II (p = 0.01) while groin pain was significantly more in group II (p = 0.01). One patient developed vesicovaginal fistula, while one patient required cutting of tape in group I. Pdet at Q max (Detrusor pressure at peak urine flow) increased significantly in both the groups after surgery. ICIQ score was zero in both the groups indicating 100 % success. Surgical trauma was more in group I as shown by significantly higher CRP levels. CONCLUSION: The success rate of the two groups was similar but, autologous rectus fascia sling surgery took longer, had more complications and urinary retention as compared to transobturator vaginal tape procedure.

A multicenter retrospective cohort study comparing urethral diverticulectomy with and without pubovaginal sling.

BACKGROUND: Urethral diverticulum is a rare entity and requires a high suspicion for diagnosis based on symptoms and physical exam with confirmation by imaging. A common presenting symptom is stress urinary incontinence (SUI). The recommended treatment is surgical excision with urethral diverticulectomy. Postoperatively, approximately 37% of patients may have persistent and 16% may have de novo SUI. An autologous fascial pubovaginal sling (PVS) placed at the time of urethral diverticulectomy (UD) has the potential to prevent and treat postoperative SUI. However, little has been published about the safety and efficacy of a concomitant pubovaginal sling. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to compare the clinical presentation, outcomes, complications, and diverticulum recurrence rates in women who underwent a urethral diverticulectomy with vs without a concurrent pubovaginal sling. STUDY DESIGN: This multicenter, retrospective cohort study included women who underwent a urethral diverticulectomy between January 1, 2000, and December 31, 2016. Study participants were identified by Current Procedure Terminology codes, and their records were reviewed for demographics, medical or surgical history, symptoms, preoperative testing, concomitant surgeries, and postoperative outcomes. Symptoms, recurrence rates, and complications were compared between women with and without a concomitant pubovaginal sling. The primary outcome was the presence of postoperative stress urinary incontinence symptoms. Based on a stress urinary incontinence rate of 50% with no pubovaginal sling and 10% with a pubovaginal sling, we needed a sample size of 141 participants who underwent diverticulectomy without a pubovaginal sling and 8 participants with a pubovaginal sling to achieve 83% power with P<.05. RESULTS: We identified 485 diverticulectomy cases from 11 institutions who met the inclusion criteria; of these, 96 (19.7%) cases had a concomitant pubovaginal sling. Women with a pubovaginal sling were older than those without a pubovaginal sling (53 years vs 46 years; P<.001), and a greater number of women with pubovaginal sling had undergone diverticulectomy previously (31% vs 8%; P<.001). Postoperative follow-up period (14.6±26.9 months) was similar between the groups. The pubovaginal sling group had greater preoperative stress urinary incontinence (71% vs 33%; P<.0001), dysuria (47% vs 30%; P=.002), and recurrent urinary tract infection (49% vs 33%; P=.004). The addition of a pubovaginal sling at the time of diverticulectomy significantly improved the odds of stress urinary incontinence resolution after adjusting for prior diverticulectomy, prior incontinence surgery, age, race, and parity (adjusted odds ratio, 2.27; 95% confidence interval, 1.02-5.03; P=.043). It was not significantly protective against de novo stress urinary incontinence (adjusted odds ratio, 0.86; 95% confidence interval, 0.25-2.92; P=.807). Concomitant pubovaginal sling increased the odds of postoperative short-term (<6 weeks) urinary retention (adjusted odds ratio, 2.5; 95% confidence interval, 1.04-6.22; P=.039) and long-term urinary retention (>6 weeks) (adjusted odds ratio, 6.98; 95% confidence interval, 2.20-22.11; P=.001), as well as recurrent urinary tract infections (adjusted odds ratio, 3.27; 95% confidence interval, 1.26-7.76; P=.013). There was no significant risk to develop a de novo overactive bladder (adjusted odds ratio, 1.48; 95% confidence interval, 0.56-3.91; P=.423) or urgency urinary incontinence (adjusted odds ratio, 1.47; 95% confidence interval, 0.71-3.06; P=.30). A concomitant pubovaginal sling was not protective against a recurrent diverticulum (adjusted odds ratio, 1.38; 95% confidence interval, 0.67-2.82; P=.374). Overall, the diverticulum recurrence rate was 10.1% and did not differ between the groups. CONCLUSION: This large retrospective cohort study demonstrated a greater resolution of stress urinary incontinence with the addition of a pubovaginal sling at the time of a urethral diverticulectomy. There was a considerable risk of postoperative urinary retention and recurrent urinary tract infections in the pubovaginal sling group.

A timeline of female stress urinary incontinence: how technology defined theory and advanced treatment.

BACKGROUND: Prevailing theories and treatments of female stress urinary incontinence are built on 120 years of evolution in understanding the structure and function of the female bladder neck and urethra and of considering why treatments failed. In our management of patients, it is important to understand and appreciate how our management of female stress urinary incontinence has evolved and which treatments have prevailed as we advance our knowledge for future treatments. AIMS: The purpose of this review is to describe how advances in technology impacted and shaped prevailing theories or understanding of the pathophysiology of stress urinary incontinence and influences our treatment approach. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An extensive literature search was performed from 1900 to present identifying articles that discussed technological advancements in female urology, theories of female stress incontinence, and treatments. RESULTS: The literature from the 20th century to the present shows a nonlinear evolution of the pathophysiological mechanism of stress urinary incontinence (SUI) from a notion of SUI and secondary to a simple anatomic finding to consideration of the effects of neurophysiologic pathways on SUI. Slings, however, have been a staple in the management of SUI. CONCLUSIONS: The pubovaginal sling (PVS) is a procedure that, with minor modifications (graft size, suture preference) has withstood the test of time and maintained its place in the armamentarium of SUI treatment for 100 years. It is therefore imperative that we continue to educate our residents and fellows on the surgical techniques and indications for use of the PVS.

Development of a safety zone for rectus abdominis fascia graft harvest based on dissections of the ilioinguinal and iliohypogastric nerves.

BACKGROUND: As a result of the vaginal mesh controversy, surgeons are performing more nonmesh, autologous fascia pubovaginal slings to treat stress urinary incontinence in women. The rectus abdominis fascia is the most commonly harvested site for autologous pubovaginal slings, so it is crucial that surgeons are familiar with the relationship between this graft harvest site and the ilioinguinal and iliohypogastric nerves, which can be injured during this procedure. OBJECTIVE: The aims of this study were as follows: (1) to estimate the safest area between the bilateral courses of the ilioinguinal and iliohypogastric nerves in which a rectus abdominis fascia graft could be harvested with minimal risk of injury to these nerves and (2) to determine the location and dimensions of a graft harvest site that maximized graft length while remaining close to the pubic symphysis. STUDY DESIGN: The ilioinguinal and iliohypogastric nerves were dissected bilaterally in 12 unembalmed female anatomical donors. The distances of these nerves to a 10 × 2 cm rectus abdominis fascia graft site located 4 cm above the pubic symphysis were measured. Nerve courses inferior to the graft site were determined for each donor by linearly extrapolating measurement points; analysis was performed with and without extrapolation. Average nerve trajectories were estimated assuming a linear regression function to predict the horizontal measurement as a quadratic function of the vertical distance; 95% confidence bands were also estimated. An estimated safety zone was determined to be the region between all credible nerve bounds. RESULTS: The largest safety zone that was closest to the pubic symphysis was located at 5.4 cm superior to the pubic symphysis. At this location, the inferior border of the graft could measure 9.4 cm in length (4.7 cm bilaterally from the midline). Extrapolated nerve courses below the study graft site yielded a smaller safety zone located 2.7 cm superior to the pubic symphysis, allowing for the inferior border of the graft to be 4.8 cm (2.4 cm bilaterally from the midline). CONCLUSION: A rectus abdominis fascia graft harvested 5.4 cm superior to the pubic symphysis with the inferior border of the graft measuring 9.4 cm in length should minimize injury to the ilioinguinal and iliohypogastric nerves. These dimensions allow for the longest graft while remaining relatively close to the pubic symphysis. The closer a graft is harvested to the pubic symphysis, the smaller in length the graft must be to avoid injury to the ilioinguinal and iliohypogastric nerves.

Joint report on the terminology for surgical procedures to treat stress urinary incontinence in women.

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: Standardized terminology for surgical procedures commonly performed to treat stress urinary incontinence in women is needed to facilitate research, clinical care, and teaching in female pelvic medicine and reconstructive surgery. METHODS: This report combines the input of members of the American Urogynecologic Society and the International Urogynecological Association, assisted by external referees. Extensive searches of the literature were performed, including Instructions for Use brochures and original source documents where possible. Historical context was considered along with procedural modifications, and expert opinion was included when appropriate. RESULTS: A terminology report for the procedures commonly performed to treat stress urinary incontinence in women was produced. Included procedures are midurethral sling, retropubic colposuspension, pubovaginal sling, urethral bulking, and artificial urinary sphincter. Appropriate figures have been included to supplement and help clarify the text. Ongoing review will be performed periodically to keep the document updated and widely acceptable. CONCLUSIONS: This document is a literature and consensus-based terminology report for surgical procedures to treat stress urinary incontinence in women. Future publications in female pelvic medicine and reconstructive surgery should use this standardized terminology whenever possible.

Optimising the tension of an autologous fascia pubovaginal sling to minimize retentive complications.

AIM: To determine the optimal degree of pubovaginal slings (PVS) tension, measured by lax sling dimensions to minimize the risk of urinary retention. METHODS: This prospective study analyzed female patients undergoing PVS for stress urinary incontinence (SUI) by two surgeons over 24 months from January 2016. Intra-operative measurements of lax sling dimensions tented over rectus fascia were recorded. Logistic regression was used to analyse the likelihood of urinary retention (more than 3 months of intermittent self-catheterisation (ISC) or surgical revision) for given PVS dimensions. The secondary analysis assessed for an association between PVS measurements and persistent SUI. RESULTS: Fifty-one patients were recruited with a median age of 53 (34-78) and follow-up of 11 (3-20) months. All but one patient reported improvement of SUI. Ten (19.6%) patients developed postoperative urinary retention. Five (9.8%) resolved after a temporary period of ISC. The other five (9.8%) required ongoing ISC or sling division. A strong association existed between short sling height and prolonged urinary retention (P = 0.00). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis showed a sling height of 40 mm had a sensitivity of 100% and specificity of 51% for retentive complications (area under curve [AUC] = 0.90). Lax sling height up to 60 mm was not associated with persistent SUI. CONCLUSIONS: Stretching the sling suspension sutures at least 40 mm above the rectus fascia was associated with a lower risk of urinary retention than less than 40 mm. This simple technique would appear to be worth evaluating in a larger sample. A looser sling did not compromise the cure of SUI at a mean follow-up of 11 months.

An Internet-based survey to evaluate the comfort and need for further pubovaginal sling training.

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: The pubovaginal sling (PVS) dates to the 1940s as an efficacious surgical treatment for stress urinary incontinence (SUI). Recently, it has been replaced by the midurethral sling (MUS). Since 2008, international regulatory agencies increased regulation and issued warnings on vaginal mesh for repair of pelvic organ prolapse (POP), which has led to increased scrutiny of the MUS. Thus, the need for surgical comfort with PVS is resurfacing. We sought to evaluate the surgical practice patterns among international urogynecologists for the treatment of SUI and identify whether a need and interest for more training exists. METHODS: We developed a short, Internet-based survey for members of the International Urogynecological Association (IUGA). Descriptive analyses, binomial and multivariate logistic regressions were calculated to determine significant associations. RESULTS: Among 556 members who responded to the survey, 72% did not offer PVS in practice. Among those who did, there was as significant relationship between offering PVS and practicing in the United States, board-certification in urogynecology, PVS exposure in training, increasing number of PVS performed during training, and comfort with PVS. Members interested in further PVS training were younger, less comfortable with PVS, performed fewer PVS, or had no exposure in training. CONCLUSION: Most IUGA members do not offer PVS in clinical practice. As would be expected, members who performed more PVS in training and were more comfortable with PVS were likely to offer it to patients. Our results highlight a learning gap, especially among younger providers who are not comfortable with PVS and desire further training in this procedure.

Surgery for Stress Urinary Incontinence: Autologous Fascial Sling.

This article describes the operative technique of autologous fascial pubovaginal sling (AFPVS) surgery, examines the senior author's outcomes with AFPVS, compares these outcomes with those of other large studies and meta-analyses, and compares the safety and efficacy of AFPVS with those of the synthetic midurethral sling (SMUS). Recently, the SMUS has become the treatment of choice for most surgeons. The efficacy of the SMUS remains unchallenged and comparable with that of AFPVS, but SMUS are associated with more severe complications. In the author's opinion, the AFPVS should remain the gold standard for treating SUI.

Surgical treatment for stress urinary incontinence in women: A systematic review and meta-analysis / Tratamento cirúrgico da incontinência urinária de esforço em mulheres: revisão sistemática e metanálise

Abstract Objective To compare surgical treatments for stress urinary incontinence in terms of efficiency and complications. Data Sources We searched the MEDLINE and COCHRANE databases using the terms stress urinary incontinence, surgical treatment for stress urinary incontinence and sling. Selection of Studies Forty-eight studies were selected, which amounted to a total of 6,881 patients with scores equal to or higher than 3 in the Jadad scale. Data Collection Each study was read by one of the authors, added to a standardized table and checked by a second author. We extracted data on intervention details, follow-up time, the results of treatment and adverse events. Data Synthesis Comparing retropubic versus transobturator slings, the former was superior for both objective (odds ratio [OR], 1.27; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.05-1.54) and subjective (OR, 1.23; 95% CI, 1.02-1.48) cures. Between minislings versus other slings, there was a difference favoring other slings for subjective cure (OR, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.39- 0.86). Between pubovaginal sling versus Burch surgery, there was a difference for both objective (OR, 2.04; 95% CI, 1.50-2.77) and subjective (OR, 1.64; 95% CI, 1.10-2.44) cures, favoring pubovaginal sling. Therewas no difference in the groups: midurethral slings versus Burch, pubovaginal sling versus midurethral slings, transobturator slings, minislings versus other slings (objective cure). Retropubic and pubovaginal slings are more retentionist. Retropubic slings have more bladder perforation, and transobturator slings, more leg and groin pain, neurological lesion and vaginal perforation. Conclusion Pubovaginal slings are superior to Burch colposuspension surgery but exhibit more retention. Retropubic slings are superior to transobturator slings, with more adverse events. Other slings are superior to minislings in the subjective aspect. There was no difference in the comparisons between midurethral slings versus Burch colposuspension surgery, pubovaginal versus midurethral slings, and inside-out versus outside-in transobturator slings.

Resumo Objetivo comparar tratamentos cirúrgicos para incontinência urinária de esforço (IUE), quanto à eficiência e complicações, por meio de revisão sistemática seguida de metanálise. Fonte dos dados Fizemos busca nas bases de dados MEDLINE e COCHRANE, utilizando os termos stress urinary incontinence, surgical treatment for stress urinary incontinence e sling. Seleção dos estudos Selecionamos 48 estudos, totalizando 6.881 pacientes com pontuação igual ou maior do que 3 na escala de Jadad. Coleta de dados Cada estudo foi lido por um autor, colocado em tabela, e checado por outro autor. Extraímos dados como detalhes das intervenções, tempo de seguimento, resultados do tratamento e eventos adversos. Síntese dos dados Não houve diferença nas comparações: sling de uretra média versus cirurgia de Burch, quanto às curas objetiva (razão de chances [RC]: 1,29; intervalo de confiança de 95% [IC95%]: 0,76-2,20) e subjetiva (RC: 1,16; IC95%: 0,67- 2,00); sling de uretramédia transobturatório outside-in versus inside-out quanto às curas objetiva (RC: 0,78; IC95%: 0,45-1,35) e subjetiva (RC: 0,83; IC95%: 0,58-1,18); sling pubovaginal e de uretra média quanto à cura objetiva (RC: 1,64; IC 95%: 0,52-5,15). Comparando sling retropúbico comtransobturatório, o retropúbico foi superior quanto às curas objetiva (RC: 1,27; IC95%: 1,05-1,54) e subjetiva (RC: 1,23; IC95%: 1,02-1,48). Entre minislings e outros slings, houve diferença favorável a outros slings quanto à cura subjetiva (RC: 0,58; IC95%: 0,39-0,86) mas não quanto à cura objetiva (RC: 0,72; IC95%: 0,47-1,10). No grupo sling pubovaginal e Burch, houve diferença quanto à cura objetiva (RC: 2,04; IC95%: 1,50-2,77) e subjetiva (RC: 1,64; IC95%: 1,10-2,44). Slings de uretra média apresentam mais erosão, enquanto a cirurgia de Burch tem mais complicações na ferida operatória e infecção do trato urinário. Slings retropúbicos e pubovaginais sãomais retencionistas. Slings retropúbicos estãomais associados a lesão vascular, hematomas e perfuração vesical, e transobturatórios, à dor na perna e virilha, lesão neurológica e perfuração vaginal. Conclusão Slings pubovaginais são superiores à cirurgia de Burch, porém mais retencionistas. Slings retropúbicos são superiores aos transobturatórios, embora tenham mais eventos adversos. Outros slings são superiores aos minislings em relação ao aspecto subjetivo. Não houve diferença nas comparações entre slings de uretra média e cirurgia de Burch, slings pubovaginais, transobturatórios inside-out e inside-in.

Autologous rectus fascia sling placement in the management of female stress urinary incontinence.

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: Autologous pubovaginal sling placement remains a treatment option in index patients, given high, long-term success rates. This video reviews the technical considerations for performing an autologous rectus fascia sling. METHODS: The patient is a 47-year-old woman with stress urinary incontinence (SUI) refractory to conservative management. First, a 10-cm rectus fascial segment is harvested and prepped with placement of nonabsorbable stay sutures for later sling passage. Then, an inverted U-shaped incision is made in the anterior vaginal wall based on the bladder neck, and perforation of the endopelvic fascia is performed. Following passage of the sling in the retropubic space, it is secured to periurethral tissue. Cystoscopy is then used to evaluate for bladder perforation and to confirm sling tensioning. RESULTS: The patient was discharged on the same day of surgery with a suprapubic tube in place, which was removed on postoperative day 7 after passing a capping trial. At 6 weeks' follow-up, the patient had complete resolution of SUI, with no de novo urgency symptoms, and could empty her bladder to completion. CONCLUSION: Autologous pubovaginal sling placement remains an effective treatment option for the management of female SUI. This video highlights important technical considerations for this procedure.

Updated Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of the Comparative Data on Colposuspensions, Pubovaginal Slings, and Midurethral Tapes in the Surgical Treatment of Female Stress Urinary Incontinence.

CONTEXT: Retropubic (RP-TVT) and transobturator miurethral (TO-TVT) midurethral sling (MUS) are popular surgical treatments for female stress urinary incontinence. The long-term efficacy and safety of the procedures is still a topic of intense clinical research and several randomised controlled trials (RCTs) have been published in the last years OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of MUS compared with other surgical treatments for female stress urinary incontinence. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: A systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature was performed using the Medline, Scopus, and Web of Science databases to update our previously published analyses. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: Twenty-eight RCTs were identified. In total, the meta-analyses included 15 855 patients. Patients receiving MUS had significantly higher overall (odds ratio [OR]: 0.59, p=0.0003) and objective (OR: 0.51, p=0.001) cure rates than those receiving Burch colposuspension. Patients undergoing MUS and pubovaginal slings had similar cure rates. Patients treated with RT-TVT had higher subjective (OR: 0.83, p=0.03) and objective (OR: 0.82, p=0.01) cure rates than those receiving TO-TVT. However, the latter had a lower risk of intraoperative bladder or vaginal perforation (OR: 2.4, p=0.0002), pelvic haematoma (OR: 2.61, p=0.002), urinary tract infections (OR: 1.31, p=0.04) and voiding lower urinary tract symptoms (OR: 1.66, p=0.002). Sensitivity analyses limited to RCTs with follow-up durations >60 mo demonstrated similar outcomes for RP-TVT and TO-TVT. No significant differences in efficacy were identified comparing inside-to-out and outside-to-in TO-TVT but vaginal perforations were less common with the former (OR: 0.21, p=0.0002). CONCLUSIONS: The present analysis confirms the superiority of MUS over Burch colposuspension. The studies comparing insertion of RT-TVT and TO-TVT showed higher subjective and objective cure rates for the RP-TVT but at the cost of higher risks of some complications and voiding lower urinary tract symptoms. Efficacy of inside-out and outside-in techniques of TO-TVT insertion was similar, although the risk of vaginal perforation was lower in the inside-to-out TO-TVT. PATIENT SUMMARY: Retropubic and transobturator midurethral slings are a popular treatment for female stress urinary incontinence. The available literature suggest that those slings are either more effective or safer than other older surgical procedures. Retropubic tapes are followed with slightly higher continence rates as compared with the transobturator tapes but are associated with higher risk of intra- and postoperative complications.

Evaluation and surgery for stress urinary incontinence: A FIGO working group report.

AIMS: To review available evidence regarding evaluation and treatment of stress urinary incontinence (SUI) and provide recommendations for management of urinary incontinence under specific conditions determined by the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) Working Group. METHODS: The FIGO Working Group discussed the management of SUI during meetings and assessed the evidence. The search of evidence was performed using MEDLINE® and Cochrane databases as well as additional searches from societies and major organizations for additional guidelines and recommendations and hand searches from bibliographies. Initial searches from 1985 to December 31, 2012 extended until July 15, 2015. After review, recommendations are made based on levels of evidence according to the recommendations from Oxford EBM Center. RESULTS: Initial evaluation of SUI consists of history and physical examination; cough stress test, evaluation for urinary tract infections (UTI), assessment of urethral mobility, and post-void residual volumes (LOE 5). Urodynamic studies are not necessary to evaluate patients with uncomplicated SUI (LOE 1a). Conservative treatment should be tried prior to surgery and more importantly in areas of low resources (LOE 5). Midurethral slings (MUS), pubovaginal (traditional suburethral) slings (PVS), and Burch colposuspension are effective in treating SUI (LOE 1a). Patients with SUI with ISD or UUI appear to have lower cure rates than patients without (LOE 2-4). There are limited data on surgical outcomes under limited resources (LOE 5). CONCLUSIONS: MUS, PVS, and Burch colposuspension are effective treatments for SUI. Evidence for recommendations to treat patients in underserved low resource areas is lacking. Neurourol. Urodynam. 36:518-528, 2017. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Concomitant repair of stress urinary incontinence with proximal urethrovaginal fistula: Our experience.

INTRODUCTION: Proximal urethrovaginal fistula (UVF) located close to the bladder neck may cause extensive sphincter damage and is usually associated with continuous incontinence, which may mask the associated stress urinary incontinence (SUI). Simultaneous correction of SUI avoids a second surgery for SUI, which needs dissection in ischemic fields and carries a high risk of failure. The aim of this study is to describe our technique of concomitant repair of SUI with proximal UVF and our results. METHODS: Between July 2010 and August 2014, 14 patients underwent UVF repair in Jackknife position by the interposition of a Martius flap and simultaneous correction of SUI by modified McGuire pubovaginal autologous fascial sling. The procedure was carried out a minimum of 3 months of presentation and after detailed preoperative evaluation. RESULTS: After a mean follow-up of 28 months, all 14 patients were continent. None of the patients developed recurrence of the UVF. Two patients presented with retention immediately after catheter removal and clean intermittent catheterization training was given to both of them. Two patients became pregnant during the follow-up period and were advised cesarean section near term. CONCLUSIONS: Repair of proximal UVF and correction of SUI can be performed in the same session to avoid the operation in an ischemic field.

Autologous pubovaginal slings: back to the future or a lost art?

Stress urinary incontinence (SUI) is an under-diagnosed problem affecting up to 50% of women worldwide. SUI is a source of psychological distress to the individual and also imposes a financial burden to the individual and the health care system. The role of surgery in the treatment in SUI has evolved steadily in the last two decades. The synthetic mid-urethral sling and its different insertion methods have gained widespread popularity and are now the most frequently used surgical interventions for women with SUI in Europe. As the use of synthetic slings becomes more widespread, an increasing number of complications are being reported. With the recent concerns surrounding the use of synthetic transvaginal meshes in organ prolapse surgery, synthetic slings have been put under further scrutiny. It is imperative for health care providers to be aware of the current issues associated with synthetic slings and the alternative surgical options available. Traditional autologous pubovaginal slings (PVS) have re-emerged as a viable alternative to synthetic slings in light of the issues with synthetic slings. The re-adoption of autologous PVS has however, been slow due to the technical difficulty of the surgery and perceived higher morbidity rates. In this article, we will discuss the various aspects of autologous PVS and its indications as an alternative to synthetic slings. We will also touch on the current evidence and controversies for synthetic mesh slings.