Development and implementation of a geriatric nursing program at an academic medical center.

Brigham and Women's Hospital, a leader in geriatric surgery, was awarded Geriatric Surgery Verification by the American College of Surgeons. This award demonstrates its expertise in meeting the specialized needs of older adults in the perioperative period to optimize their surgical outcomes and experience. Among the program's standards is implementing the geriatric nurse champion role and education in alignment with the Nurses Improving Care for Healthsystem Elders (NICHE) practice model. In this month's NICHE column, nurse leaders from Brigham and Women's Hospital describe its path to achieving Geriatric Surgery Verification and implementing the NICHE practice model in the perioperative setting.

Driving change: NICHE community engagement, integration, and adoption initiatives.

As NICHE enters its fourth decade, it is a nursing innovation that has endured and adapted to meet the needs of older adults by fortifying the geriatric nursing workforce. Examining "Why NICHE and why now?" to guide NICHE implementation is important for the NICHE program and its members. The next steps for the NICHE community aim to build on our collective strengths, deepen integration with established geriatric quality programs and nursing professional organization partners, and increase the adoption of the NICHE practice model. These priorities and ways NICHE members may join in achieving them are outlined in this month's column.

Experience of Uncommon EGFR Mutation in Lung Scheme Quality Program: Discussing Risks and Opportunities for the Improvement of Laboratory Response.

Background The quality programs can be considered to be a valuable tool for global and individual growth. Each result, obtained by a single laboratory, contributes to define the standardization of the response. In the case of the uncommon epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations, the molecular result is sometimes difficult to interpret in terms of biological significance and therapy choosing. The standardization effort in the diagnostic lung setting also consists of active quality program participation. Materials and Methods The quality control analysis, which is defined as a clinical case, was performed by the extraction of DNA from FFPE sections and by RT-PCR on the EGFR (exons 19, 20, 21), BRAF, and KRAS genes. The laboratory performed a validation sequencing of EGFR exon 20 with the help of the Sanger method. Results The laboratory reported positivity for EGFR exon 20 insertions and negative results for BRAF and KRAS. The quality test finished with the redaction of a report containing the recommendation to consider the efficacy of therapy with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI). This specific interpretation has determined poor performance judgment by the quality provider, which explained why most of these mutations are TKI-resistant. Conclusions This experience provides an opportunity to reflect on the critical aspects of this diagnostic setting. The detection of some uncommon EGFR mutations should entail the mutation characterization, especially for the rare exon 20 insertions, of which are not classifiable as "resistant." Moreover, this experience allows reflecting on the quality program design, mandatory actions for the laboratory, and routine activity in the oncologic multidisciplinary team.

Improving Rectal Cancer Outcomes with the National Accreditation Program for Rectal Cancer.

Background The treatment of rectal cancer has undergone dramatic changes over the past 50 years. It has evolved from a rather morbid disease usually requiring a permanent stoma, almost exclusively managed by surgeons, to one that involves experts across numerous disciplines to provide the best care for the patient. With significant improvements in surgical techniques, the use of chemotherapy and radiotherapy, advanced imaging, and standardization of pathological assessment, the perioperative morbidity and permanent colostomy rates have significantly decreased. We have seen improvements in the quality of the specimen and rates of recurrence as well as disease-free survival. Rectal cancer, as demonstrated in European trials, has now been recognized as a disease best managed by a multidisciplinary team. Objective The aim of this article is to evaluate the main body of literature leading to the advances made possible by the new American College of Surgeons Commission on Cancer National Accreditation Program for Rectal Cancer. Results Following the launch of the American College of Surgeons Commission on Cancer National Accreditation Program for Rectal Cancer, we expect dramatic increases in membership and accreditation, with associated improvement in center performance and, ultimately, in patient outcomes. Limitations The National Accreditation Program for Rectal Cancer began in 2017. To date, the only data that have been analyzed are from the preintervention phase. Conclusions Based on the results of studies within the United States and on the successes demonstrated in Europe, it remains our hope and expectation that the management of rectal cancer in the United States will rapidly improve.

Rural Standards and the Quality Equation.

The article describes the barriers rural surgeons face when attempting to measure, analyze, and benchmark the quality and value of the care they provide for their patients. Examples of suboptimal care are presented as well as special geographic and resource-related circumstances for many of these disparities of care. The article includes in-depth descriptions of the American College of Surgeons (ACS) Optimal Resources for Surgical Quality and Safety Program and the ACS Rural Hospital Surgical Verification and Quality Improvement Program. The article concludes by discussing several documented clinical, economic, and social advantages of keeping surgical care local.

Assessing the effectiveness of Australian early childhood education and care experiences: study protocol.

BACKGROUND: In Australia, 61.5 % of children aged 3-4 attend Early Childhood Education and Care (ECEC) programs. Children's experiences within these programs vary widely and impact directly on educational wellbeing and social development. Research has shown that higher quality programs enhance children's learning and developmental outcomes, foster social participation and have long-lasting effects on their productivity as adults. Quality matters, yet we do not know what components of ECEC result in a quality program. Effective Early Educational Experiences (E4Kids) is a 5-year longitudinal study designed to identify and assess the impact of mainstream ECEC programs and program components on children's learning, development, social inclusion and well-being. E4Kids sets out to measure quality ECEC; identify components that add value and positively impact children's outcomes; evaluate the effects of child, family, community and environment characteristics on programs; and provide evidence on how best to invest in ECEC. METHODS/DESIGN: E4Kids follows a sample of 2,494 children who have experienced a variety of approved care programs (long day care, kindergarten, family day care and occasional care), as well as 157 children who have not accessed such programs. Children are tracked to the first point of National Assessment Program - Literacy and Numeracy (NAPLAN) testing at Year 3. The study presents a multi-level design in which ECEC programs were sampled from two states - Queensland and Victoria - then randomly sampled from two greater metropolitan regions and two regional and remote locations. Parents, centre directors, educators and carers complete questionnaires to provide information on demographics and children's progress. Data collected also include the make-up and organisation of ECEC programs and schools children attended. The quality of adult-child interactions is directly assessed using the Classroom Assessment Scoring System (CLASS) and direct testing of children's cognitive abilities and achievements is undertaken over 3 years and linked with NAPLAN scores. DISCUSSION: Findings from the E4Kids study have the potential to influence the quality of ECEC available in Australia by providing up-to-date evidence on the impact of ECEC programs and program components to inform future policy decisions and research.

Recomendaciones para mejorar la seguridad radiológica durante los procedimientos de intervencionismo cardiológico / Recommendations to improve radiation safety during invasive cardiovascular procedures

El objetivo de este articulo fue entregar una guia con recomendaciones para mejorar la Seguridad Radiológica durante los procedimientos de intervencionismo cardiológico. Se describe la clasificación de los efectos causados por las radiaciones ionizantes a los pacientes y personal médico. Se recomienda la aplicación de un programa de Garatia de Calidad, el cual implicará tantos gastos, como mayores beneficios. Como parte de este programa, se sugiere la implementación de un programa de Protección Radiológica, que incluya al personal, monitoreo de la radiación, blindajes y entrenamiento del personal. Se deben establecer acciones permanentes en cada laboratorio de hemodinamia para gestionar de la mejor forma posible las dosis de radiación antes, durante y después de la intervención. Finalmente, para avanzar en la implementación de estas recomendaciones, creemos que un paso fundamental es la revisión de nuestro marco juridico en el ámbito de la Seguridad Radiológica, donde resultan imprescindibles aspectos como la implementación de programas de Garantia de Calidad y Protección Radiológica, junto al establecimiento de Niveles Referenciales de dosis para pacientes.

In this paper we present guidelines aimed to improve radiation safety during invasive cardiovascular procedures. Unwanted effects upon patients and medical personnel are conventionally classified. A program of Quality Assurance is proposed, an aspect of which is a program for radiologic protection, including operator protection, radiation monitoring, shielding and personnel training. Permanent and specific actions should be taken at every cardiovascular lab, before, during and after interventions. In order to implement these guidelines and actions, a fundamental step is a review of current legislation. Specific programs for quality control and radiologic protection along with a definition of acceptable radiation exposure doses are required.