Experimental comparison of cylindrical and plane parallel ionization chambers for reference dosimetry in continuous and pulsed scanned proton beams.

Objective. In this experimental work we compared the determination of absorbed dose to water using four ionization chambers (ICs), a PTW-34045 Advanced Markus, a PTW-34001 Roos, an IBA-PPC05 and a PTW-30012 Farmer, irradiated under the same conditions in one continuous- and in two pulsed-scanned proton beams.Approach. The ICs were positioned at 2 cm depth in a water phantom in four square-field single-energy scanned-proton beams with nominal energies between 80 and 220 MeV and in the middle of 10 × 10 × 10 cm3dose cubes centered at 10 cm or 12.5 cm depth in water. The water-equivalent thickness (WET) of the entrance window and the effective point of measurement was considered when positioning the plane parallel (PP) ICs and the cylindrical ICs, respectively. To reduce uncertainties, all ICs were calibrated at the same primary standards laboratory. We used the beam quality (kQ) correction factors for the ICs under investigation from IAEA TRS-398, the newly calculated Monte Carlo (MC) values and the anticipated IAEA TRS-398 updated recommendations.Main results. Dose differences among the four ICs ranged between 1.5% and 3.7% using both the TRS-398 and the newly recommendedkQvalues. The spread among the chambers is reduced with the newlykQvalues. The largest differences were observed between the rest of the ICs and the IBA-PPC05 IC, obtaining lower dose with the IBA-PPC05.Significance. We provide experimental data comparing different types of chambers in different proton beam qualities. The observed dose differences between the ICs appear to be related to inconsistencies in the determination of thekQvalues. For PP ICs, MC studies account for the physical thickness of the entrance window rather than the WET. The additional energy loss that the wall material invokes is not negligible for the IBA-PPC05 and might partially explain the lowkQvalues determined for this IC. To resolve this inconsistency and to benchmark MC values,kQvalues measured using calorimetry are needed.

Suitability of novel 3D-printed and coated vessels for water calorimetry.

BACKGROUND: In water calorimetry, absolute dose to water is determined by measuring radiation-induced temperature rises. In conventional water calorimeters, temperature detectors are housed in handmade glass vessels that are filled with high-purity water, thus mitigating radiation-induced exo/endothermic chemical reactions of impurities that would otherwise introduce additional heat gain/loss, known as heat defect. Being hand-crafted, these glass vessels may suffer from imperfections, have shape and design constraints, are often backordered, and can be prohibitively expensive. PURPOSE: The purpose of this work is to determine suitability of 3D-printed plastic vessels that are further coated for use in water calorimetry applications, and to study their stability and characterize their associated heat defect correction factor ( k hd ) ${k_{{\mathrm{hd}}}})$ . This novel vessel production technique would allow for cost-effective rapid construction of vessels that can be produced with high accuracy and designs that are simply not practical with current glass vessel construction techniques. This in turn enables water calorimetry applications in many novel radiation delivery modalities, which may include spherical vessels in GammaKnife ICON water calorimetry as an example. METHODS: Eight vessels were 3D-printed using Accura ClearVue in an SLA 3D-printer. Two vessels were coated with Parylene C and four were coated with Parylene N. The water calorimetry preparation procedures followed for these vessels was identical to that of our traditional glass-vessels (i.e., same cleaning procedures, same high purity water, and same saturation procedures with high purity hydrogen gas). The performance of each vessel was characterized using our in-house built water calorimeter in an Elekta Versa using both 6 MV flattening filter-free (FFF) and 18 MV beams. The stability of the coating as function of time and accumulated dose was evaluated through repeated measurements. k hd ${k_{{\mathrm{hd}}}}\;$ of each vessel was determined through cross-comparisons against an Exradin A1SL ionization chamber with direction calibration link to Canada's primary standard laboratory. RESULTS: k HD ${k_{{\mathrm{HD}}}}\;$ of the two uncoated vessels differed by 2.8% under a 6 MV FFF beam. Vessels coated with Parylenes resulted in a stable and reproducible heat defect for both energies. An overall k hd ${k_{{\mathrm{hd}}}}$ of 1.001 ± 0.010 and 1.005 ± 0.010 were obtained for Parylene N and Parylene C coated vessels respectively. All Parylene coated vessels showed agreement, within the established uncertainties, to the zero-heat defect observed in a hydrogen-saturated glass vessel system. An additional long-term study (17 days) of a Parylene N vessel showed no change in response with accumulated dose and time. Electron microscopy images of a Parylene N coated vessel showed a uniform intact coating after repeated irradiations. CONCLUSIONS: An uncoated 3D-printed vessel is not viable for water calorimetry because it exhibits an unstable vessel-dependent heat defect. However, applying a Parylene coating stabilizes the heat defect, suggesting that coated 3D-printed vessels may be suitable for use in water calorimetry. This method facilitates the creation of intricate vessel shapes, which can be efficiently manufactured using 3D printing.

Minimum phantom size for megavoltage photon beam reference dosimetry.

BACKGROUND: Water phantoms are required to perform reference dosimetry and beam quality measurements but there are no published studies about the size requirements for such phantoms. PURPOSE: To investigate, using Monte Carlo techniques, the size requirements for water phantoms used in reference dosimetry and/or to measure the beam quality specifiers % d d ( 10 ) x $\%dd(10)_{\sf x}$ and T P R 10 20 $TPR^{20}_{10}$ . METHODS: The EGSnrc application DOSXYZnrc is used to calculate D ( 10 ) $D(10)$ , the dose per incident fluence at 10 cm depth in a water phantom irradiated by incident 10 × 10 cm 2 $10\,\times \,10 \, {\rm {cm}}^{2}$   beams of 60 Co $^{60}{\rm {Co}}$   or 6 MV photons. The water phantom dimensions are varied from 30 × 30 × 40 cm 3 $30 \,\times \, 30 \,\times \, 40 \, {\rm {cm}}^3$ to 15 × 15 × 22 cm 3 $15 \,\times \, 15 \,\times \, 22 \, {\rm {cm}}^3$ and occasionally smaller. The % d d ( 10 ) x $\%dd(10)_{\sf x}$ and T P R 10 20 $TPR^{20}_{10}$ values are also calculated with care being taken to distinguish T P R 10 20 $TPR^{20}_{10}$ results when using Method A (changing depth of water in phantom) and Method B (moving entire phantom). Typical statistical uncertainties are 0.03%. RESULTS: Phantom dimensions have only minor effects for phantoms larger than 20 × 20 × 25 cm 3 $20 \,\times \, 20 \,\times \, 25 \, {\rm {cm}}^3$ . A table of corrections to the dose at 10 cm depth in 10 × 10 cm 2 $10 \,\times \, 10 \, {\rm {cm}}^{2}$   beams of 60 Co $^{60}{\rm {Co}}$   or 6 MV photons are provided and range from no correction to 0.75% for a 60 Co $^{60}{\rm {Co}}$  beam incident on a 20 × 20 × 15 cm 3 $20 \,\times \, 20 \,\times \, 15 \, {\rm {cm}}^3$ phantom. There can be distinct differences in the T P R 10 20 $TPR^{20}_{10}$ values measured using Method A or Method B, especially for smaller phantoms. It is explicitly demonstrated that, within ± $\pm$ 0.15%, T P R 10 20 $TPR^{20}_{10}$ values for a 30 × 30 × 30 cm 3 $30 \,\times \, 30 \,\times \, 30 \, {\rm {cm}}^3$ phantom measured using Method A or B are independent of source detector distance between 40 and 200 cm. CONCLUSIONS: The phantom sizes recommended in the TG-51 and IAEA TRS-398 reference dosimetry protocols are adequate for accurate reference dosimetry and in some cases are even conservative. Correction factors are necessary for accurate measurement of the dose at 10 cm depth in smaller phantoms and these factors are provided. Very accurate beam quality specifiers are not required for reference dosimetry itself, but for specifying beam stability and characteristics it is important to specify phantom sizes and also the method used for T P R 10 20 $TPR^{20}_{10}$  measurements.

Beam quality correction factors for ionization chambers in a 0.35 T magnetic resonance (MR)-linac - A Monte Carlo study.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to directly calculate [Formula: see text] correction factors for four cylindrical ICs for a 0.35 T MR-linac using the Monte Carlo (MC) method. METHODS: A previously-validated TOPAS/GEANT4 MC head model of the 0.35 T MR-linac was employed. The MR-compatible Exradin A12, A1SL, A26, and A28 cylindrical ICs were modeled considering the dead volume in the air cavity. The [Formula: see text] correction factor was determined for initial electron energies of 5-7 MeV. The correction factor was calculated for all four angular orientations in the lateral plane. The impact of the 0.35 T magnetic field on the IC response was also investigated. RESULTS: The maximum beam quality dependence in the [Formula: see text] exhibited by the A12, A1SL, A26, and A28 ICs was 1.10 %, 2.17 %, 0.81 %, and 1.75 %, respectively, considering all angular orientations. The magnetic field dependence was < 1 % and the maximum [Formula: see text] correction was < 2 % when the detector was aligned along the direction of the magnetic field at 0° and 180° angles. The A12 IC over-responded up to 5.40 % for the orthogonal orientation. An asymmetry in the response of up to 8.30 % was noted for the A28 IC aligned at 90° and 270° angles. CONCLUSIONS: A parallel orientation for the IC, with respect to the magnetic field, is recommended for reference dosimetry in MRgRT. Both over and under-response in the IC signal was noted for the orthogonal orientations, which is highly dependent on the cavity diameter, cavity length, and the dead volume.

Determination of thePrpand radial dose correction factor in reference dosimetry.

Objectives.In an addendum to AAPM TG-51 protocol, McEwenet al, (DOI:10.1118/1.4866223) introduced a new factorPrpto account for the radial dose distribution of the photon beam over the detector volume mainly in flattening filter free (FFF) beams.Prpand its extension to non-FFF beam reference dosimetry is investigated to see its impact in a clinical situation.Approches.ThePrpwas measured using simplified version of Sudhyadhomet al(DOI:10.1118/1.4941691) for Elekta and Varian FFF beams with two commonly used calibration detectors; PTW-30013 and Exradin-A12 ion chambers after acquiring high resolution profiles in detectors cardinal coordinates. For radial dose correction factor, the ion chambers were placed in a small water phantom and the central axis position was set to center of the sensitive volume on the treatment table and was studied by rotating the table by 15-degree interval from -90 to +90 degrees with respect to the initial (zero) position.Main results.The magnitude ofPrpvaries very little with machine, detector and beam energies to a value of 1.003 ± 0.0005 and 1.005 ± 0.0005 for 6FFF and 10FFF, respectively. The radial anisotropy for the Elekta machine with Exradin-A12 and PTW-30013 detector the magnitudes are in the range of (0.9995±0.0011 to 1.0015±0.0010) and (0.9998±0.0007 to 1.0015±0.0010), respectively. Similarly, for the Varian machine with Exradin-A12 and PTW-30013 ion chambers, the magnitudes are in the range of (1.0004±0.0010 to 1.0018±0.0018) and (1.0006±0.0009 to 1.0027±0.0007), respectively.Significance.ThePrpis ≤ 0.3% and 0.5% for 6FFF and 10FFF, respectively. The radial dose correction factor in regular beams also does not impact the dosimetry where the maximum magnitude is ±0.2% which is within experimental uncertainty.

Beam monitor chamber calibration of a synchro-cyclotron high dose rate per pulse pulsed scanned proton beam.

Objective. Ionization chambers, mostly used for beam calibration and for reference dosimetry, can show high recombination effects in pulsed high dose rate proton beams. The aims of this paper are: first, to characterize the linearity response of newly designed asymmetrical beam monitor chambers (ABMC) in a 100-226 MeV pulsed high dose rate per pulse scanned proton beam; and secondly, to calibrate the ABMC with a PPC05 (IBA Dosimetry) plane parallel ionization chamber and compare to calibration with a home-made Faraday cup (FC).Approach. The ABMC response linearity was evaluated with both the FC and a PTW 60019 microDiamond detector. Regarding ionometry-based ABMC calibration, recombination factors were evaluated theoretically, then numerically, and finally experimentally measured in water for a plane parallel ionization chamber PPC05 (IBA Dosimetry) throughkssaturation curves. Finally, ABMC calibration was also achieved with FC and compared to the ionometry method for 7 energies.Main results. Linearity measurements showed that recombination losses in the new ABMC design were well taken into account for the whole range of the machine dose rates. The two-voltage-method was not suitable for recombination correction, but Jaffé's plots analysis was needed, emphasizing the current IAEA TRS-398 reference protocol limitations. Concerning ABMC calibration, FC based absorbed dose estimation and PPC05-based absorbed dose estimation differ by less than 6.3% for the investigated energies.Significance.So far, no update on reference dosimetry protocols is available to estimate the absorbed dose in ionization chambers for clinical high dose rate per pulse pulsed scanned proton beams. This work proposes a validation of the new ABMC design, a method to take into account the recombination effect for ionometry-based ABMC calibration and a comparison with FC dose estimation in this type of proton beams.

Consistency of Faraday cup and ionization chamber dosimetry of proton fields and the role of nuclear interactions.

BACKGROUND: A Faraday cup (FC) facilitates a quite clean measurement of the proton fluence emerging from clinical spot-scanning nozzles with narrow pencil-beams. The utilization of FCs appears to be an attractive option for high dose rate delivery modes and the source models of Monte-Carlo (MC) dose engines. However, previous studies revealed discrepancies of 3%-6% between reference dosimetry with ionization chambers (ICs) and FC-based dosimetry. This has prevented the widespread use of FCs for dosimetry in proton therapy. PURPOSE: The current study aims at bridging the gap between FC dosimetry and IC dosimetry of proton fields delivered with spot-scanning treatment heads. Particularly, a novel method to evaluate FC measurements is introduced. METHODS: A consistency check is formulated, which makes use of the energy balance and the reciprocity theorem. The measurement data comprise central-axis depth distributions of the absorbed dose of quasi-monochromatic fields with a width of about 28.5 cm and FC measurements of the reciprocal fields with a single spot. These data are complemented by a look-up of energy-range tables, the average Q-value of transmutations, and the escape energy carried away by neutrons and photons. The latter data are computed by MC simulations, which in turn are validated with measurements of the distal dose tail and neutron out-of-field doses. For comparison, the conventional approach of FC evaluation is performed, which computes absorbed dose from the product of fluence and stopping power. The results from the FC measurements are compared with the standard dosimetry protocols and improved reference dosimetry methods. RESULTS: The deviation between the conventional FC-based dosimetry and the IC-based one according to standard dosimetry protocols was -4.7 ( ± $\pm$ 3.3)% for a 100 MeV field and -3.6 ( ± $\pm$ 3.5)% for 200 MeV, thereby agreeing within the reported uncertainties. The deviations could be reduced to -4.0 ( ± $\pm$ 2.9)% and -3.0 ( ± $\pm$ 3.1)% by adopting state-of-the-art reference dosimetry methods. The alternative approach using the energy balance gave deviations of only -1.9% (100 MeV) and -2.6% (200 MeV) using state-of-the-art dosimetry. The standard uncertainty of this novel approach was estimated to be about 2%. CONCLUSIONS: An alternative concept has been established to determine the absorbed dose of monoenergetic proton fields with an FC. It eliminates the strong dependence of the conventional FC-based approach on the MC simulation of the stopping-power and of the secondary ions, which according to the study at hand is the major contributor to the underestimation of the absorbed dose. Some contributions to the uncertainty of the novel approach could potentially be reduced in future studies. This would allow for accurate consistency tests of conventional dosimetry procedures.

A multicenter study of modified electron beam output calibration.

PURPOSE: This study aims to assess the accuracy of a modified electron beam calibration based on the IAEA TRS-398 and AAPM-TG-51 in multicenter radiotherapy. METHODS: This study was performed using the Elekta and Varian Linear Accelerator electron beams with energies of 4-22 MeV under reference conditions using cylindrical (PTW 30013, IBA FC65-G, and IBA FC65-P) and parallel-plate (PTW 34045, PTW 34001, and IBA PPC-40) chambers. The modified calibration used a cylindrical chamber and an updated k ' Q $k{^{\prime}}_Q$ based on Monte Carlo calculations, whereas TRS-398 and TG-51 used cylindrical and parallel-plate chambers for reference dosimetry. The dose ratio of the modified calibration procedure, TRS-398 and TG-51 were obtained by comparing the dose at the maximum depth of the modified calibration to TRS-398 and TG-51. RESULTS: The study found that all cylindrical chambers' beam quality conversion factors determined with the modified calibration ( k ' Q ) $( {{{k^{\prime}}}_Q} )$ to the TRS-398 and TG-51 vary from 0.994 to 1.003 and 1.000 to 1.010, respectively. The dose ratio of modified/TRS-398cyl and modified/TRS-398parallel-plate, the variation ranges were 0.980-1.014 and 0.981-1.019, while for the counterpart modified/TG-51cyl was found varying between 0.991 and 1.017 and the ratio of modified/TG-51parallel-plate varied in the range of 0.981-1.019. CONCLUSION: This multi-institutional study analyzed a modified calibration procedure utilizing new data for electron beam calibrations at multiple institutions and evaluated existing calibration protocols. Based on observed variations, the current calibration protocols should be updated with detailed metrics on the stability of linac components.

Experimental determination of magnetic field quality conversion factors for eleven ionization chambers in 1.5 T and 0.35 T MR-linac systems.

BACKGROUND: The static magnetic field present in magnetic resonance (MR)-guided radiotherapy systems can influence dose deposition and charged particle collection in air-filled ionization chambers. Thus, accurately quantifying the effect of the magnetic field on ionization chamber response is critical for output calibration. Formalisms for reference dosimetry in a magnetic field have been proposed, whereby a magnetic field quality conversion factor kB,Q is defined to account for the combined effects of the magnetic field on the radiation detector. Determination of kB,Q in the literature has focused on Monte Carlo simulation studies, with experimental validation limited to only a few ionization chamber models. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to experimentally measure kB,Q for 11 ionization chamber models in two commercially available MR-guided radiotherapy systems: Elekta Unity and ViewRay MRIdian. METHODS: Eleven ionization chamber models were characterized in this study: Exradin A12, A12S, A28, and A26, PTW T31010, T31021, and T31022, and IBA FC23-C, CC25, CC13, and CC08. The experimental method to measure kB,Q utilized cross-calibration against a reference Exradin A1SL chamber. Absorbed dose to water was measured for the reference A1SL chamber positioned parallel to the magnetic field with its centroid placed at the machine isocenter at a depth of 10 cm in water for a 10 × 10 cm2 field size at that depth. Output was subsequently measured with the test chamber at the same point of measurement. kB,Q for the test chamber was computed as the ratio of reference dose to test chamber output, with this procedure repeated for each chamber in each MR-guided radiotherapy system. For the high-field 1.5 T Elekta Unity system, the dependence of kB,Q on the chamber orientation relative to the magnetic field was quantified by rotating the chamber about the machine isocenter. RESULTS: Measured kB,Q values for our test dataset of ionization chamber models ranged from 0.991 to 1.002, and 0.995 to 1.004 for the Elekta Unity and ViewRay MRIdian, respectively, with kB,Q tending to increase as the chamber sensitive volume increased. Measured kB,Q values largely agreed within uncertainty to published Monte Carlo simulation data and available experimental data. kB,Q deviation from unity was minimized for ionization chamber orientation parallel or antiparallel to the magnetic field, with increased deviations observed at perpendicular orientations. Overall (k = 1) uncertainty in the experimental determination of the magnetic field quality conversion factor, kB,Q was 0.71% and 0.72% for the Elekta Unity and ViewRay MRIdian systems, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: For a high-field MR-linac, the characterization of ionization chamber performance as angular orientation varied relative to the magnetic field confirmed that the ideal orientation for output calibration is parallel. For most of these chamber models, this study represents the first experimental characterization of chamber performance in clinical MR-linac beams. This is a critical step toward accurate output calibration for MR-guided radiotherapy systems and the measured kB,Q values will be an important reference data source for forthcoming MR-linac reference dosimetry protocols.

The influence of different versions of FLUKA and GEANT4 on the calculation of response functions of ionization chambers in clinical proton beams.

Objective.To investigate the influence of different versions of the Monte Carlo codesgeant4 andflukaon the calculation of overall response functionsfQof air-filled ionization chambers in clinical proton beams.Approach. fQfactors were calculated for six plane-parallel and four cylindrical ionization chambers withgeant4 andfluka. These factors were compared to already published values that were derived using older versions of these codes.Main results.Differences infQfactors calculated with different versions of the same Monte Carlo code can be up to ∼1%. Especially forgeant4, the updated version leads to a more pronounced dependence offQon proton energy and to smallerfQfactors for high energies.Significance.Different versions of the same Monte Carlo code can lead to differences in the calculation offQfactors of up to ∼1% without changing the simulation setup, transport parameters, ionization chamber geometry modeling, or employed physics lists. These findings support the statement that the dominant contributor to the overall uncertainty of Monte Carlo calculatedfQfactors are type-B uncertainties.

Optically stimulated luminescence system as an alternative for radiochromic film for 2D reference dosimetry in UHDR electron beams.

Radiotherapy is part of the treatment of over 50% of cancer patients. Its efficacy is limited by the radiotoxicity to the healthy tissue. FLASH-RT is based on the biological effect that ultra-high dose rates (UHDR) and very short treatment times strongly reduce normal tissue toxicity, while preserving the anti-tumoral effect. Despite many positive preclinical results, the translation of FLASH-RT to the clinic is hampered by the lack of accurate dosimetry for UHDR beams. To date radiochromic film is commonly used for dose assessment but has the drawback of lengthy and cumbersome read out procedures. In this work, we investigate the equivalence of a 2D OSL system to radiochromic film dosimetry in terms of dose rate independency. The comparison of both systems was done using the ElectronFlash linac. We investigated the dose rate dependence by variation of the (1) modality, (2) pulse repetition frequency, (3) pulse length and (4) source to surface distance. Additionally, we compared the 2D characteristics by field size measurements. The OSL calibration showed transferable between conventional and UHDR modality. Both systems are equally independent of average dose rate, pulse length and instantaneous dose rate. The OSL system showed equivalent in field size determination within 3 sigma. We show the promising nature of the 2D OSL system to serve as alternative for radiochromic film in UHDR electron beams. However, more in depth characterization is needed to assess its full potential.

Quantifying uncertainties associated with reference dosimetry in an MR-Linac.

BACKGROUND: Magnetic resonance (MR)-guided radiation therapy provides capabilities to utilize high-resolution and real-time MR imaging before and during treatment, which is critical for adaptive radiotherapy. This emerging modality has been promptly adopted in the clinic settings in advance of adaptations to reference dosimetry formalism that are needed to account for the presence of strong magnetic fields. In particular, the influence of magnetic field on the uncertainty of parameters in the reference dosimetry equation needs to be determined in order to fully characterize the uncertainty budget for reference dosimetry in MR-guided radiation therapy systems. PURPOSE: To identify and quantify key sources of uncertainty in the reference dosimetry of external high energy radiotherapy beams in the presence of a strong magnetic field. METHODS: In the absence of a formalized Task Group report for reference dosimetry in MR-integrated linacs, the currently suggested formalism follows the TG-51 protocol with the addition of a quality conversion factor kBQ accounting for the effects of the magnetic field on ionization chamber response. In this work, we quantify various sources of uncertainty that impact each of the parameters in the formalism, and evaluate their overall contribution to the final dose. Measurements are done in a 1.5 T MR-Linac (Unity, Elekta AB, Stockholm, Sweden) which integrates a 1.5 T Philips MR scanner and a 7 MVFFF linac. The responses of several reference-class small volume ionization chambers (Exradin:A1SL, IBA:CC13, PTW:Semiflex-3D) and Farmer type ionization chambers (Exradin:A19, IBA:FC65-G) were evaluated throughout this process. Long-term reproducibility and stability of beam quality, TPR 10 20 ${\mathrm{TPR}}_{10}^{20}$ , was also measured with an in-house built phantom. RESULTS: Relative to the conventional external high energy linacs, the uncertainty on overall reference dose in MR-linac is more significantly affected by the chamber setup: A translational displacement along y-axis of ± 3 mm results in dose variation of < |0.20| ± 0.02% (k = 1), while rotation of ± 5° in horizontal and vertical parallel planes relative to relative to the direction of magnetic field, did not exceed variation of < |0.44| ± 0.02% for all 5 ionization chambers. We measured a larger dose variation for xy-plane (horizontal) rotations (< |0.44| ± 0.02% (k = 1)) than for yz-plane (vertical) rotations (< ||0.28| ± 0.02% (k = 1)), which we associate with the gradient of kB,Q as a function of chamber orientation with respect to direction of the B0 -field. Uncertainty in Pion (for two depths), Ppol (with various sub-studies including effects of cable length, cable looping in the MRgRT bore, connector type in magnetic environment), and Prp were determined. Combined conversion factor kQ × kB,Q was provided for two reference depths at four cardinal angle orientations. Over a two-year period, beam quality was quite stable with TPR 10 20 ${\mathrm{TPR}}_{10}^{20}$ being 0.669 ± 0.01%. The actual magnitude of TPR 10 20 ${\mathrm{TPR}}_{10}^{20}$ was measured using identical equipment and compared between two different Elekta Unity MR-Linacs with results agreeing to within 0.21%. CONCLUSION: In this work, the uncertainty of a number of parameters influencing reference dosimetry was quantified. The results of this work can be used to identify best practice guidelines for reference dosimetry in the presence of magnetic fields, and to evaluate an uncertainty budget for future reference dosimetry protocols for MR-linac.

Technical note: Consistency of IAEA's TRS-483 and AAPM's extended TG-51 protocols for clinical reference dosimetry of the CyberKnife M6 machine.

BACKGROUND: While IAEA's TRS-483 code of practice is adapted for the calibration of CyberKnife machines, AAPM's TG-51 is still the protocol recommended by the manufacturer for their calibration. The differences between both protocols could lead to differences in absorbed dose to water during the calibration process. PURPOSE: The aims of this work are to evaluate the difference resulting from the application of TG-51 (including the manufacturer's adaptations) and TRS-483 in terms of absorbed dose to water for a CyberKnife M6, and to evaluate the consistency of TRS-483. METHODS: Measurements are performed on a CyberKnife M6 unit under machine-specific reference conditions using a calibrated Exradin A12 ionization chamber. Monte Carlo (MC) simulations are performed to estimate k Q msr , Q 0 f msr , f ref $k_{Q_{\mathrm{msr}},Q_0}^{f_{\mathrm{msr}},f_{\mathrm{ref}}}$ and k vol $k_{\text{vol}}$ using a fully modeled detector and an optimized CyberKnife M6 beam model. The latter is also estimated experimentally. Differences between the adapted TG-51 and TRS-483 protocols are identified and their impact is quantified. RESULTS: When using an in-house experimentally-evaluated volume averaging correction factor, a difference of 0.11% in terms of absorbed dose to water per monitor unit is observed when applying both protocols. This disparity is solely associated to the difference in beam quality correction factor. If a generic volume averaging correction factor is used during the application of TRS-483, the difference in calibration increases to 0.14%. In both cases, the disparity is not statistically significant according to TRS-483's reported uncertainties on their beam quality correction factor (i.e., 1%). MC results lead to k Q msr , Q 0 f msr , f ref = 1.0004 ± 0.0002 $k_{Q_{\mathrm{msr}},Q_0}^{f_{\mathrm{msr}},f_{\mathrm{ref}}}=1.0004\pm 0.0002$ and k vol = 1.0072 ± 0.0009 $k_{\text{vol}}=1.0072\pm 0.0009$ . Results illustrate that the generic beam quality correction factor provided in the TRS-483 might be overestimated by 0.36% compared to our specific model and that this overestimation could be due to the volume averaging component. CONCLUSIONS: For clinical reference dosimetry of the CyberKnife M6, the application of TRS-483 is found to be consistent with TG-51.

ACPSEM position paper: dosimetry for magnetic resonance imaging linear accelerators.

Consistency and clear guidelines on dosimetry are essential for accurate and precise dosimetry, to ensure the best patient outcomes and to allow direct dose comparison across different centres. Magnetic Resonance Imaging Linac (MRI-linac) systems have recently been introduced to Australasian clinics. This report provides recommendations on reference dosimetry measurements for MRI-linacs on behalf of the Australiasian College of Physical Scientists and Engineers in Medicine (ACPSEM) MRI-linac working group. There are two configurations considered for MRI-linacs, perpendicular and parallel, referring to the relative direction of the magnetic field and radiation beam, with different impacts on dose deposition in a medium. These recommendations focus on ion chambers which are most commonly used in the clinic for reference dosimetry. Water phantoms must be MR safe or conditional and practical limitations on phantom set-up must be considered. Solid phantoms are not advised for reference dosimetry. For reference dosimetry, IAEA TRS-398 recommendations cannot be followed completely due to physical differences between conventional linac and MRI-linac systems. Manufacturers' advice on reference conditions should be followed. Beam quality specification of TPR20,10 is recommended. The configuration of the central axis of the ion chamber relative to the magnetic field and radiation beam impacts the chamber response and must be considered carefully. Recommended corrections to delivered dose are [Formula: see text], a correction for beam quality and [Formula: see text], for the impact of the magnetic field on dosimeter response in the magnetic field. Literature based values for [Formula: see text] are given. It is important to note that this is a developing field and these recommendations should be used together with a review of current literature.

Reflections on a life with Monte Carlo in Medical Physics.

The author reminisces about some of his experiences working with Monte Carlo techniques for Medical Physics applications.

[A Survey of Dosimetry in the Magnetic Field of MR-Linacs].

In recent years, MR-Linac, a radiotherapy linear accelerator (linac) equipped with magnetic resonance (MR) imaging, has been deployed in clinical facilities across Japan. Because of the magnetic field of MR-Linac, which can affect the dose distributions and dose response of ionization chambers, conventional reference dosimetry for absorbed dose to water using an ionization chamber becomes impractical. Consequently, the magnetic field effect should be considered in the reference dosimetry for MR-Linac. Although numerous studies have delved into this matter and several magnetic field correction methods have been proposed to extend the conventional formalism, a practical protocol for reference dosimetry for MR-Linac remains elusive.The purpose of this review are as follows: (i) to summarize and evaluate literature and existing datasets as well as identify any gaps that highlight areas for the future research on this topic; (ii) to elucidate dosimetric challenges associated with ionization chamber dosimetry in magnetic fields; and (iii) to propose a formalism for reference dosimetry for MR-Linac based on available literature and datasets. This review focuses on studies based on commercially available MR-Linacs and datasets, specifically tailored for reference-class cylindrical ion chambers.

Current best estimates of beam quality correction factors for reference dosimetry of clinical proton beams.

Objective. To review the currently available data on beam quality correction factors,kQ,for ionization chambers in clinical proton beams and derive their current best estimates for the updated recommendations of the IAEA TRS-398 Code of Practice.Approach. The reviewed data come from 20 publications from whichkQvalues can be derived either directly from calorimeter measurements, indirectly from comparison with other chambers or from Monte Carlo calculated overall chamber factors,fQ.For cylindrical ionization chambers, a distinction is made between data obtained in the centre of a spread-out Bragg peak and those obtained in the plateau region of single-energy fields. For the latter, the effect of depth dose gradients has to be considered. To this end an empirical model for previously published displacement correction factors for single-layer scanned beams was established, while for unmodulated scattered beams experimental data were used. From all the data, chamber factors,fQ,and chamber perturbation correction factors,pQ,were then derived and analysed.Main results. The analysis showed that except for the beam quality dependence of the water-to-air mass stopping power ratio and, for cylindrical ionization chambers in unmodulated beams, of the displacement correction factor, there is no remaining beam quality dependence of the chamber perturbation correction factorspQ.Based on this approach, average values of the beam quality independent part of the perturbation factors were derived to calculatekQvalues consistent with the data in the literature.Significance. The resulting data from this analysis are current best estimates ofkQvalues for modulated scattered beams and single-layer scanned beams used in proton therapy. Based on this, a single set of harmonized values is derived to be recommended in the update of IAEA TRS-398.

AAPM WGTG51 Report 374: Guidance for TG-51 reference dosimetry.

Practical guidelines that are not explicit in the TG-51 protocol and its Addendum for photon beam dosimetry are presented for the implementation of the TG-51 protocol for reference dosimetry of external high-energy photon and electron beams. These guidelines pertain to: (i) measurement of depth-ionization curves required to obtain beam quality specifiers for the selection of beam quality conversion factors, (ii) considerations for the dosimetry system and specifications of a reference-class ionization chamber, (iii) commissioning a dosimetry system and frequency of measurements, (iv) positioning/aligning the water tank and ionization chamber for depth ionization and reference dose measurements, (v) requirements for ancillary equipment needed to measure charge (triaxial cables and electrometers) and to correct for environmental conditions, and (vi) translation from dose at the reference depth to that at the depth required by the treatment planning system. Procedures are identified to achieve the most accurate results (errors up to 8% have been observed) and, where applicable, a commonly used simplified procedure is described and the impact on reference dosimetry measurements is discussed so that the medical physicist can be informed on where to allocate resources.

Monte Carlo investigation of electron fluence perturbation in MRI-guided radiotherapy beams using six commercial radiation detectors.

With the integration of treatments with MRI-linacs to the clinical workflow, the understanding and characterization of detector response in reference dosimetry in magnetic fields are required. The external magnetic field perturbs the electron fluence. The degree of perturbation depends on the irradiation conditions and on the detector type. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the magnetic field impact on the electron fluence spectra in several detectors to provide a deeper understanding of detector response in these conditions. Monte Carlo calculations of the electron fluence are performed in six detectors (solid-state: PTW60012 and PTW60019, ionization chambers: PTW30013, PTW31010, PTW31021, and PTW31022) in water and irradiated by a 7 MV FFF photon beam with a small and a reference field, at 0 and 1.5 T. Three chamber axis orientations are investigated: parallel or perpendicular (either the Lorentz force pointing towards the stem or the tip) to the magnetic field and always perpendicular to the photon beam. One orientation for the solid-state detector is studied: parallel to the photon beam and perpendicular to the magnetic field. Additionally, electron fluence spectra are calculated in modified detector geometries to identify the underlying physical mechanisms behind the fluence perturbations. The total electron fluence in the Farmer chamber varies up to 1.24% and 5.12% at 1.5 T, in the parallel and perpendicular orientation, respectively. The interplay between the gyration radius and the Farmer chamber cavity length significantly affects the electron fluence in the perpendicular orientation. For the small-cavity chambers, the maximal variation in total electron fluence is 0.19% in the parallel orientation for the reference field. Significant small-field effects occur in these chambers; the magnetic field reduces the total electron fluence (with respect to the no field case) between 9.86% and 14.50%, depending on the orientation. The magnetic field strongly impacted the solid-state detectors in both field sizes, probably due to the high-Z components and cavity density. The maximal reductions of total electron fluence are 15.06 ± 0.09% (silicon) and 16.00 ± 0.07% (microDiamond). This work provides insights into detector response in magnetic fields by illustrating the interplay between several factors causing dosimetric perturbation effects: (1) chamber and magnetic field orientation, (2) cavity size and shape, (3) extracameral components, (4) air gaps and their asymmetry, (5) electron energy. Low-energy electron trajectories are more susceptible to change in magnetic fields, and are associated with detector response perturbation. Detectors with higher density and high-Z extracameral components exhibit more significant perturbations in the presence of a magnetic field, regardless of field size.

Repeatability of Small Field Output Factor Measurements with Various Detectors.

There are well established dosimetry reference standards for broad beams; however, there are no reference standards that can be used for both broad and small fields. The variation of the equivalent square fields and field output factors in small static photon fields when using a synthetic diamond, an electron diode, and ionization chambers (pin point, semiflex, and liquid filled) was investigated over time. Data from this study were compared to the data from other hospitals in the country and standard data sets, i.e., the British Journal of Radiology Supplement No. 25 of 1996 (BJR25) and the Radiological Physics Centre (RPC) 2012 data. The results showed that reliance on one detector and one measurement session, could yield incorrect field output factors (FOFs) for small fields. At least one of the detectors should be a solid state type with published field output correction factors and at least three measurement sessions should be performed for each FOF data point. Comparing measured data with published datasets, like RPC, will assist in verifying data. BJR25 datasets should not be used for S clin ≤4 cm.