Assessing the Role of Flexible Sigmoidoscopy for Patients With Positive Fecal Immunochemical Test (FIT) and Rectal Bleeding as a Sole Symptom Within the Fast-Track Pathway.

Background Rectal bleeding is a frequent symptom, with causes ranging from benign conditions to serious diseases like colorectal cancer (CRC) and inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). In the UK, the two-week wait (2WW) referral pathway, which includes the fecal immunochemical test (FIT), plays a key role in triaging suspected CRC cases. This study evaluates the effectiveness of flexible sigmoidoscopy (FS) in detecting significant bowel pathologies (SBPs) in FIT-positive patients with isolated rectal bleeding. Methods We reviewed records of 344 patients with isolated rectal bleeding and a positive FIT result, referred to the 2WW pathway at York and Scarborough Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust from February to December 2023. All patients underwent colonoscopy. Findings from colonoscopy were used as a standard to compare with the expected reach of FS. Pathologies were categorized into SBPs (cancer, IBD, polyps ≥10 mm) and non-SBPs, and the location of SBPs in relation to the splenic flexure was also assessed. Results The average age of patients was 61.58 years. Significant bowel pathology (SBP) was identified in 89 of 344 (25.9%) patients, including 16 (18%) patients with cancer, 21 (23.6%) patients with IBD, and 52 (58.4%) patients with large polyps. All cases of cancer and IBD were found distal to the splenic flexure, while 21.1% (11/89) of large polyps were proximal. Higher FIT values (>100 µg Hb/g feces) and older age were significantly associated with SBPs. However, age and higher FIT values did not predict whether SBPs were proximal or distal. Conclusion For FIT-positive patients with isolated rectal bleeding, FS can serve as an effective initial diagnostic tool. Patients without detected cancer can be downgraded from the fast-track pathway to routine colonoscopy follow-up to avoid missing proximal premalignant lesions. This approach enhances resource utilization while ensuring comprehensive patient care. Further studies are needed to improve triage criteria and diagnostic accuracy within the 2WW pathway.

Splenic flexure adenocarcinoma: A national cohort analysis of extent of surgical resection and outcomes.

AIM: The optimal extent of resection for splenic flexure adenocarcinoma remains debated. These tumours straddle the left- and right-sided vasculature with lymphatic drainage in a watershed area; current guidelines recommend either segmental or extended colectomy. We analysed surgical management of splenic flexure tumours and compared outcomes between approaches. METHOD: The Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results database was searched for adults with Stage I-III splenic flexure adenocarcinoma, 2004-2019. RESULTS: Of 5238 patients, 55% underwent extended colectomy. Compared to segmental colectomy, these patients were more likely to have advanced stage. On multivariable analysis, age ≤ 65 years remained independently associated with extended colectomy. Although fewer nodes were examined in segmental colectomy (median 14 vs. 16, p < 0.001), the number of positive nodes (both, median 0 [interquartile ratio 0-2], p = 0.20) and the lymph node ratio were similar between cohorts. Surgical approach was not significantly associated with increased positive nodal yield in adjusted analyses. Five-year overall and disease-specific survival were 73% and 84% for segmental and 72% and 83% for extended colectomy (p > 0.4); these remained comparable after adjustment. CONCLUSIONS: Nationally, we observed similar rates of segmental and extended colectomy for splenic flexure adenocarcinoma. Extended colectomy was not more common in Stage III disease, indicating lack of stage migration, and was not associated with better oncological outcomes. These observations support current practice involving either approach, which should be tailored to patient-related factors and preferences, while considering technical aspects and quality of life.

Comparative Efficacy and Long-Term Oncological Safety of Extended Right Hemicolectomy Versus Left Colectomy for Splenic Flexure Adenocarcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Splenic flexure adenocarcinoma poses unique challenges in surgical management due to its location and lymphatic drainage. This study compared the efficacy and oncological safety of extended right hemicolectomy (ERC) and left colectomy (LC) for treating this condition. METHODS: This study followed the PRISMA and AMSTAR 2 guidelines. Key outcomes included postoperative mortality, morbidity, severe complications, operative results, pathological findings (R0 resection, lymph nodes), and oncological results (overall survival and disease-free survival at 3 and 5 years). RESULTS: Twelve non-randomised studies were included involving 1710 patients (713 ERC group, 997 LC group). The analysis showed that ERC was associated with more lymph nodes and a lower conversion rate. However, there were no significant differences between ERC and LC in terms of mortality, morbidity, severe complications, anastomotic leak, wound infection, ileus, reoperation, R0 resection, hospital stay, and overall and disease-free survival rates. CONCLUSIONS: ERC and LC are comparable in terms of postoperative and long-term oncological outcomes for splenic flexure adenocarcinoma, with ERC potentially producing a higher lymph node harvest rate and a lower conversion rate. ERC could be suggested for a better stage of the disease and when the surgical team considers the laparoscopic approach.

Treatment Differences for Splenic Flexure Cancers in Saudi Arabia: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Backgrounds Colorectal surgeons worldwide have differing opinions on the best way to handle rare cases of splenic flexure colon cancers (SFCs). Although the majority of reviews indicate no significant variation in oncological outcomes among the three different procedure types used to treat SFCs, surgeons still exhibit diversity in their practices. This study determined the treatment preferences of colorectal surgeons in Saudi Arabia. Methods A descriptive cross-sectional study evaluated the management of colorectal surgeons in handling SFC cases. We utilized a validated questionnaire developed by Manceau et al., consisting of 14 questions. Emails and phone numbers of members of the Saudi Society of Colorectal Surgery (SSCRS) were gathered. Google Forms surveys were administered from October 1-30, 2023. Results A response rate of 66% (58/88) was obtained among questioned colorectal surgeons. Their responses revealed that there was no consensus regarding the preferred procedure to treat SFCs. The most common treatment reported was segmental colectomy (SC) 21/58 (36.2%), followed by subtotal colectomy (STC) (19/58, 32.8%) and left hemicolectomy (LHC) (18/58, 31%). There was a strong consensus of 96% (56/58) of the respondents in favor of using stapler anastomosis rather than hand sewing. The frequency of performing SC, STC, and LHC in France was 70%, 13%, and 17%, respectively, compared to 36.2%, 32.8%, and 31% in Saudi Arabia, with a p-value of 0.001. The surgeons' preferred approaches to managing SFCs utilizing laparoscopic, open, or hand-aided in France versus Saudi Arabia were 63%, 31%, and 11%, respectively, compared to 84.5%, 8.6%, and 6.9%, with a p-value of 0.001. Conclusion A significant disparity exists regarding the treatment of SFCs between colorectal surgeons in France and Saudi Arabia. Furthermore, there is a lack of consensus among colorectal surgeons in Saudi Arabia regarding the surgical management of SFCs. Hence, it is imperative for the SCRSS to assemble a panel of experts to reach a consensus for the most appropriate and effective treatment of SFCs.

Metastatic Adenocarcinoma of the Prostate Masquerading as a Splenic Flexure Colonic Polyp: A Diagnostic Conundrum.

Metastasis of prostate cancer to the gastrointestinal tract is infrequently described in the literature, with only a limited number of cases reporting metastasis to the rectum. We present a rare case of a 74-year-old man initially presenting with symptomatic anemia and weight loss. A colonoscopy revealed a sessile polyp in the splenic flexure. Microscopic examination of the specimen showed micro-acinar structures, and immunohistochemical staining was positive for prostate-specific antigen (PSA) and NKX3.1. Subsequently, elevated serum PSA levels and staging computed tomography (CT) findings, in conjunction with histopathological analysis, confirmed a diagnosis of metastatic prostate adenocarcinoma.

Innovative pancreas-guided technique for splenic flexure mobilization in laparoscopic left hemicolectomy.

OBJECTIVE: Splenic flexure mobilization (SFM) is a major challenge in laparoscopic left hemicolectomy. This study aims to assess the safety and effectiveness of the pancreas-guided SFM technique during laparoscopic left hemicolectomy. METHODS: From January 2018 to December 2023, 352 patients with left-sided colon cancer underwent laparoscopic left hemicolectomy. Based on the SFM method used, the patients were divided into the pancreas-guided group (167 cases) or the "Three Approaches Roundabout"/classic group (185 cases). Clinicopathologic characteristics and intraoperative and postoperative variables were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: The two groups had no significant differences in baseline indicators (P > 0.05). All surgeries were successful without needing to convert to laparotomy, and there were no combined organ resections involving the spleen or pancreas in either group. The mean duration of surgery was significantly lower in the pancreas-guided group than in the classic group (P < 0.01). The median volume of intraoperative blood loss in the pancreas-guided group was lower than that in the classic group (P < 0.01). Through video playback, it was found that the retro-pancreatic space had been entered during operation in 8 cases (4.3%) in the classic group, while there were no such occurrences in the pancreas-guided group. This difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05). The difference in the number of lymph nodes cleared, postoperative hospital stays, and incidence of complications were not statistically significant (all P > 0.05) between the groups. CONCLUSION: The pancreas-guided SFM technique is a safe and feasible option for laparoscopic left hemicolectomy. Our study's findings suggest that this approach facilitates accurate access to the correct anatomic plane, potentially improving surgical efficiency.

Splenic flexure mobilization in left-sided colonic and rectal resections: A meta-analysis and meta-regression of factors associated with anastomotic leak and complications.

AIM: Splenic flexure mobilization (SFM) is commonly performed during left-sided colon and rectal resections. The aim of the present systematic review was to assess the outcomes of SFM in left-sided colon and rectal resections and the risk factors for complications and anastomotic leak (AL). METHOD: This study was a PRISMA-compliant systematic review. PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science were searched for studies that assessed the outcomes of sigmoid and rectal resections with or without SFM. The primary outcomes were AL and total complications, and the secondary outcomes were individual complications, operating time, conversion to open surgery, length of hospital stay (LOS) and pathological and oncological outcomes. RESULTS: Nineteen studies including data on 81 116 patients (49.1% male) were reviewed. SFM was undertaken in 40.7% of patients. SFM was associated with a longer operating time (weighted mean difference 24.50, 95% CI 14.47-34.52, p < 0.0001) and higher odds of AL (OR 1.19, 95% CI 1.06-1.33, p = 0.002). Both groups had similar odds of total complications, splenic injury, anastomotic stricture, conversion to open surgery, (LOS), local recurrence, and overall survival. A secondary analysis of rectal cancer cases only showed similar outcomes for SFM and the control group. CONCLUSIONS: SFM was associated with a longer operating time and higher odds of AL, yet a similar likelihood of total complications, splenic injury, anastomotic stricture, conversion to open surgery, LOS, local recurrence, and overall survival. These conclusions must be cautiously interpreted considering the numerous study limitations. SFM may have only been selectively undertaken in cases in which anastomotic tension was suspected. Therefore, the suboptimal anastomoses may have been the reason for SFM rather than the SFM being causative of the anastomotic insufficiencies.

Extended procedure has no oncological benefits over segmental resection in the treatment of non-metastatic splenic flexure colon cancer, a population-based cohort study and a single center's decade-long experience.

To compare the oncological survival outcome between extended resections (ER) and segmental resection (SR) for non-metastatic splenic flexure tumors. A total of 10,063 splenic flexure colon cancers patients who underwent ER (n = 5546) or SR (n = 4517) from 2010 to 2018 were included from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)-registered database. Additionally, we included 135 patients from our center who underwent ER (n = 54) or SR (n = 81) between 2011 and 2021. Survival rates were compared between groups. To reduce the inherent bias of retrospective studies, propensity score matching (PSM) analysis was performed. In the SEER database, patients in the ER group exhibited higher pT stage, pN stage, larger tumor size, and elevated rates of CEA level, perineural invasion, and tumor deposits compared to those in the SR group (each P < 0.05). The 5-year cancer-specific survival (CSS) rate was slightly lower in the ER group than in the SR group (79.2% vs. 81.6%, P = 0.002), while the 5-year overall survival (OS) rates were comparable between the two groups (66.2% vs. 66.9%, P = 0.513). After performing PSM, both the 5-year CSS and 5-year OS rates were comparable between the ER and SR groups (5-year CSS: 84.9% vs. 83.0%, P = 0.577; 5-year OS: 70.6% vs. 66.0%, P = 0.415). These findings were consistent in the subgroup analysis that included only patients with stage III disease or tumor size ≥ 7 cm. Furthermore, although the number of harvested lymph nodes was higher in the ER group compared to the SR group (14.4 vs. 12.7, P < 0.001), the number of invaded lymph nodes remained similar between the two groups (0.5 vs. 0.5, P = 0.90). Similarly, our center's data revealed comparable 3-year OS and 3-year disease-free survival (DFS) rates between the two groups. ER have no significant oncological benefits over SR in the treatment of non-metastatic splenic flexure colon cancer, even for locally advanced cases.

A comprehensive evaluation of 80 consecutive robotic low anterior resections: impact of not mobilizing the splenic flexure alongside low-tie vascular ligation as a standardized technique.

Rectal cancer surgery represents challenges due to its location. To overcome them and minimize the risk of anastomosis-related complications, some technical maneuvers or even a diverting ileostomy may be required. One of these technical steps is the mobilization of the splenic flexure (SFM), especially in medium/low rectal cancer. High-tie vascular ligation may be another one. However, the need of these maneuvers may be controversial, as especially SFM may be time-consuming and increase the risk of iatrogenic. The objective is to present the short- and long-term outcomes of a low-tie ligation combined with no SFM in robotic low anterior resection (LAR) for mid- and low rectal cancer as a standardized technique. A retrospective observational single-cohort study was carried out at Reina Sofia University Hospital, Cordoba, Spain. 221 robotic rectal resections between Jul-18th-2018 and Jan-12th-2023 were initially considered. After case selection, 80 consecutive robotic LAR performed by a single surgeon were included. STROBE checklist assessed the methodological quality. Histopathological, morbidity and oncological outcomes were assessed. Anastomotic stricture occurrence and distance to anal verge were evaluated after LAR by rectosigmoidoscopy. Variables related to the ileostomy closure such as time to closure, post-operative complications or hospital stay were also considered. The majority of patients (81.2%) presented a mid-rectal cancer and the rest, lower location (18.8%). All patients had adequate perfusion of the anastomotic stump assessed by indocyanine green. Complete total mesorectal excision was performed in 98.8% of the patients with a lymph node ratio < 0.2 in 91.3%. The anastomotic leakage rate was 5%. One patient (1.5%) presented local recurrence. Anastomosis stricture occurred in 7.5% of the patients. The limitations were small cohort and retrospective design. The non-mobilization of the splenic flexure with a low-tie ligation in robotic LAR is a feasible and safe procedure that does not affect oncological outcomes.

Unveiling the hidden: identification and management of overlooked blood vessels in laparoscopic left hemicolectomy for splenic flexure cancer.

BACKGROUND: During laparoscopic left hemicolectomy procedures, a previously overlooked consistently thick blood vessel within the gastrocolic ligament near the splenic hilum may contribute to post-operative bleeding complications. The purpose of this study was to investigate the identification and management of the previously overlooked blood vessel. METHODS: This is a retrospective descriptive study of patients undergoing laparoscopic left colectomy for splenic fexure cancer conducted at a national gastrointestinal surgery centre in China. Consecutive patients with splenic fexure cancer who underwent laparoscopic left colectomy using our"five-step process"(n = 34) between January 2021 and July 2023 were included. RESULTS: The vessels can be effectively exposed using the aforementioned "five-step process." It was observed that the overlooked vessels consistently present in all patients were identified as the omental branch of the left gastroepiploic artery and vein. CONCLUSION: We have identified the origin of previously overlooked blood vessels and recommended a safe method for their management. This may offer advantages to colorectal surgeons performing laparoscopic left colectomy for splenic flexure cancer.

Short- and long-term outcomes after surgical treatment of 5918 patients with splenic flexure colon cancer by extended right colectomy, segmental colectomy and left colectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Background: Colorectal cancer is among the most common cancers in the world, and splenic flexure colon cancer accounts for about 2-5% of them. There is still no consensus on the surgical treatment of splenic flexure colon cancer (SFCC), and the extent of surgical resection and lymph node dissection for SFCC is still controversial. Aim: To compare the postoperative and long-term oncologic outcomes of extended right colectomy (ERC), segmental colectomy (SC) and left colectomy (LC) for SFCC. Method: Up to March 2024, retrospective and prospective studies of ERC, SC, and LC for SFCC were searched through databases. Pooled weighted/standardized mean difference (WMD/SMD), odds ratio (OR) and hazard ratio (HR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated using a fixed effects model or random effects model, and meta-analysis was performed using Stata. Results: This meta-analysis includes 5,918 patients from 13 studies with more lymph node harvest (OR:6.29; 95%Cl: 3.66-8.91; Z=4.69, P=0), more operation time (WMD: 22.53; 95%Cl: 18.75-26.31; Z=11.68, P=0), more blood loss (WMD:58.44; 95%Cl: 20.20-96.68; Z=2.99, P=0.003), longer hospital stay (WMD:1.74; 95%Cl: 0.20-3.29; Z=2.21, P=0.03), longer time to return to regular diet (WMD:3.17; 95%Cl: 2.05-4.30; Z=5.53, P=0), longer first flatus time (WMD:1.66; 95%Cl: 0.96-2.37; Z=4.61, P=0) in ERC versus SC. More lymph node harvest (WMD: 3.52; 95% Cl: 1.59-5.44; Z=3.58, P=0) in ERC versus LC and LC versus SC (WMD: 1.97; 95% CI: 0.53-3.41; Z=2.68, P=0.007), respectively. There is no significant difference between anastomotic leakage, postoperative ileus, total postoperative complication, severe postoperative complication, wound infection, reoperations, R0 resection, postoperative mortality, 5-year overall survival (OS), 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) in three group of patients. In LC versus SC and ERC versus LC, there is no difference between operation time, blood loss, hospital stay, return to regular diet, and first flatus. Conclusion: In the included studies, SC and LC may be more advantageous, with fewer postoperative complications and faster recovery. ERC harvests more lymph nodes, but there is no significant difference in long-term OS and DFS between the three surgical approaches. Given that the included studies were retrospective, more randomized controlled trials are needed to validate this conclusion.

SF-CORNER (splenic flexure colorectal cancer): an international survey of operative approaches and outcomes for cancers of the splenic flexure.

AIM: The optimum surgical approach to splenic flexure cancers (SFCs) remains uncertain. The aim of this survey was to explore the opinions of an international surgical community on the management and outcomes of SFC. METHOD: A questionnaire was constructed comprising five sections (information about respondents; definition and prognosis of SFC; operative approach; approach in specific scenarios; outcomes) and circulated through an international dissemination committee and social media. RESULTS: The survey received 576 responses over 4 weeks across 50 countries. There was no consensus regarding the definition of the splenic flexure, whilst the proportion of respondents who did and did not think that patients with SFC had a worse outcome was equal. The overall preferred operative approach was left hemicolectomy [203 (35.2%)], followed by segmental resection [167 (29%)], extended right hemicolectomy [126 (21.9%)] and subtotal colectomy [7 (12%)]. The stated pedicles for ligation varied between resection types and also within the same resection. One hundred and sixty-six (28.8%) respondents thought a segmental resection was associated with the worst survival and 190 (33%) thought it was associated with the best quality of life. CONCLUSION: This survey confirms a lack of consensus across all aspects SFC treatment. The differing approaches described are likely to represent different beliefs around the variable anatomy of this region and the associated lymphatic drainage. Future studies are required to address such inconsistencies and identify the optimum surgical strategy, whilst also incorporating quality-of-life metrics and patient-reported outcomes. A one-size-fits-all approach is probably not appropriate with SFC, and a more bespoke approach is required.

Splenic flexure cancer: is right extended hemicolectomy better than left hemicolectomy?

INTRODUCTION: There is no consensus on the optimal surgery for splenic flexure cancers. METHODS: Review of a prospectively maintained database of patients with splenic flexure cancer undergoing either a right extended hemicolectomy or left hemicolectomy at a tertiary care cancer hospital from 14.5.2010 to 16.9.2021. The primary outcome measures were postoperative morbidity and hospital stay with secondary outcomes being overall survival, disease-free survival, and long-term patient reported functional and quality of life outcomes. RESULTS: The demographic variables were evenly distributed between groups, and median follow-up was 44 months. The groups were comparable in terms of postoperative morbidity (Clavien-Dindo complication ≥ 3a 10.6% vs 10%, p = 0.322) and hospital stay (8 days vs 7 days, p = 0.316). Oncological outcomes were similar in both groups (3-year disease-free survival 71.8% vs 67.8%, p = 0.877, and 3-year overall survival 83.9% vs 75.8%, p = 0.787), and long-term patient-reported functional outcomes were excellent in both groups. CONCLUSION: Oncological outcomes, post operative morbidity, and long-term patient reported functional outcomes are comparable in patients undergoing either a right extended or left hemicolectomy for splenic flexure cancer.

Surgical management strategies for colorectal malignancies of the splenic flexure - A systematic review and network meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Extended right hemicolectomy (ERHC) or left hemicolectomy (LHC) are accepted as the standard-of-care for colonic tumours of the splenic flexure. Lymphatic drainage at this site is poorly defined and subject to significant heterogeneity. Nevertheless, emerging evidence demonstrates the potential oncological safety of segmental splenic flexure colectomy (SFC). AIM: To perform a systematic review and network meta-analysis (NMA) to compare outcomes following ERHC, LHC and SFC for splenic flexure tumours (SFTs). METHODS: A systematic review was performed as per PRISMA guidelines. NMA was performed using R Shiny and Netmeta packages. RESULTS: A total of 13 studies, involving 6176 patients (ERHC n = 785; LHC n = 1527; SFC n = 3864) were included in the NMA. There was no difference in overall survival (OS) (SFC vs LHC Hazard Ratio [HR] 1.0, 95% Credible Interval [CrI] 0.76,1.34; SFC vs ERHC HR 1.18, 95% CrI 0.85,1.58) between the groups. SFC had a shorter operation time (Mean 176.37 min; Mean Difference [MD] SFC vs LHC 20.34 min 95% CrI 10.9, 29.97; SFC vs ERHC MD 22.19 95% CrI 11.09, 33.29) but also had a lower average lymph node yield (LNY) compared with ERHC (MD 7.15, 95% CrI 5.71, 8.60). ERHC had a significantly higher incidence of post-operative ileus (Odds Ratio [OR] 3.47, 95% CrI 1.11, 10.84). There was also no difference observed for minimally invasive approaches, anastomotic leak rate, perioperative mortality, reoperation rates or length of stay. CONCLUSIONS: While SFC may allow for reduced operative duration and improved bowel function postoperatively. SFC, LHC, ERHC are all acceptable approaches for curative resection of cancers of the splenic flexure, with no difference in OS observed. Thus, surgeon preference and candidate-specific factors will likely determine the management of SFTs.

Splenic flexure mobilization and anastomotic leakage in anterior resection for rectal cancer: A multicentre cohort study.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Some colorectal surgeons advocate routine splenic flexure mobilization (SFM) when performing anterior resection for rectal cancer to ensure a tension-free anastomosis. Meta-analyses of smaller studies suggest that this approach does not influence anastomotic leakage rates, but larger multicentre studies are needed to confirm the safety of a selective strategy. The aim of this study is to evaluate the impact of SFM on anastomotic leakage. METHODS: This is a retrospective multicentre cohort study, comprising 1109 patients operated with anterior resection for rectal cancer in 2014-2018. Exposure was SFM, while anastomotic leakage within a year constituted the outcome. Stratified analyses were performed for type of mesorectal excision and surgical approach, as well as sensitivity analysis considering vascular tie placement. Multivariable Cox regression with hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) was employed to adjust for confounding, while multiple imputation was used for missing data. RESULTS: SFM was performed in 381 patients (34.4%). Anastomotic leakage occurred in 83 (21.8%) and 123 (20.3%) patients operated with and without SFM, respectively. SFM was neither clearly detrimental nor beneficial regarding anastomotic leakage (adjusted HR = 0.82; 95% CI: 0.59-1.15), with no apparent differences for total or partial mesorectal excision and minimally invasive or open surgery. Concurrent high vascular ligation did not impact these results, and there was no evidence of interaction from centers with a more common use of SFM. CONCLUSIONS: SFM did not seem to influence the risk of anastomotic leakage after anterior resection for rectal cancer, regardless of type of mesorectal excision, use of minimally invasive surgery, or high vascular ligation.

The first case of splenic flexure volvulus treated with reduced port surgery using single-incision laparoscopy.

INTRODUCTION: Splenic flexure volvulus (SFV) is a rare disease. We encountered a case of SFV, caused by congenital anomalies and persistent constipation. CASE PRESENTATION: A 43-year-old woman with a 35-year history of persistent constipation presented to the emergency department with acute lower abdominal pain. She had no past surgical history, and her vital signs were stable. A contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CE-CT) scan confirmed the SFV diagnosis. We initially performed endoscopic repositioning. To prevent recurrence, a laparoscopic left hemicolectomy was then carried out using reduced port surgery (RPS). She experienced no postoperative complications and was discharged seven days post-surgery. DISCUSSION: While SFV is typically managed through endoscopic repositioning followed by definitive surgical intervention to prevent recurrence, we successfully employed RPS in this case. Patients with SFV might be prime candidates for RPS due to the non-attachment of the descending colon to the retroperitoneum. Additionally, since SFV is a benign condition that doesn't necessitate lymph node dissection, it aligns well with the capabilities of RPS. Postoperatively, the patient experienced improved constipation symptoms. We hypothesize that this SFV was a result of a combination of factors: intestinal over-length, chronic constipation, and the loose adhesion of the descending colon to the retroperitoneum. CONCLUSION: This case demonstrates that RPS can be efficacious in treating SFV.

Evaluación angiográfica de la distribución anatómica de la irrigación sanguínea del ángulo esplénico del colon en población chilena

Objetivo: Identificar los patrones de distribución vascular del ángulo esplénico del colon (AEC) en la población chilena para su comparación con la literatura oriental (Fukuoka). Materiales y Métodos: Estudio descriptivo, transversal. Se caracterizó la irrigación del AEC de imágenes con protocolo Urotac realizadas en Clínica INDISA entre el año 2020 y 2021 (n = 127), clasificándolas dentro de 6 tipos descritos por Fukuoka. Se evaluaron características demográficas y comorbilidades. Las variables fueron analizadas utilizando estadística descriptiva y la significancia mediante la prueba Chi2. Resultados: Existen diferencias en los tipos irrigación del AEC entre la serie local y Fukuoka, la irrigación tipo 3 fue la que presentó mayor variación (p < 0,05). El tipo 1 es la más frecuente (34,7%), sin casos del Tipo 4. No se identificó diferencia entre los distintos tipos de irrigación con relación a las variables demográficas y comorbilidades. Discusión: Al comparar nuestra serie con la oriental se evidenció similar frecuencia en tipos 1 y 6, mayor en tipos 3 y 5, y tipos 2 y 4 con menor representación. Se identificó un mayor aporte en la irrigación del AEC por la arteria cólica izquierda (ACI) en la población estudiada (64,6%). Conclusión: Nuestra población tiene mayor participación de ACI en irrigación del AEC que orientales (64,6% vs 49,6%), los tipos más frecuentes son 1, 3 y 6, el Tipo 1 es la forma más frecuente de irrigación, similar a Fukuoka (34,7% vs 39,7%), Tipo 3 tiene mayor representación en nuestra población que en la oriental (29,9% vs 9,9%).

Objective: To identify the vascular distribution patterns of the splenic flexure of the colon (AEC) in the Chilean population for comparison with the oriental literature (Fukuoka). Methods: Descriptive, cross-sectional study. The irrigation of the AEC of images with the Urotac protocol performed at the INDISA Clinic between 2020 and 2021 (n = 127) was characterized, classifying them into 6 types described by Fukuoka. Demographic characteristics and comorbidities were evaluated. Variables were analyzed using descriptive statistics and significance using the Chi2 test. Results: There are differences in the types of irrigation of the AEC between the local series and Fukuoka, irrigation type 3 was the one that presented the greatest variation (p < 0.05). Type 1 is the most frequent (34.7%), with no cases of Type 4. No difference was identified between the different types of irrigation in relation to demographic variables and comorbidities. Discussion: When comparing our series with the eastern one, a similar frequency was found in types 1 and 6, higher in types 3 and 5, and types 2 and 4 with less representation. A greater contribution was identified in the irrigation of the AEC by the left colic artery (ICA) in the population studied (64.6%). Conclusion: Our population has a greater participation of ICA in AEC irrigation than Orientals (64.6% vs 49.6%), the most frequent types are 1, 3 and 6, Type 1 is the most frequent form of irrigation, similar to Fukuoka (34.7% vs 39.7%), Type 3 is more represented in our population than in the eastern one (29.9% vs 9.9%).

Usefulness of 3D-CT Angiography to Determine the Extent of Lymphadenectomy in Colon Cancer of the Splenic Flexure.

BACKGROUND/AIM: This study aimed to evaluate the extent of lymph node dissection (LND) determined using preoperative Three-dimensional computed tomographic angiography (3D-CTA), in the management of splenic flexure colon cancer (SFC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this retrospective, observational study, 61 patients who underwent preoperative 3D-CTA and laparoscopic complete mesocolic excision for SFC between December 2011 and December 2021 were identified at a tertiary care center in Japan. Preoperative 3D-CTA was used to confirm the feeding arteries, following which the extent of LND was determined. Left hemicolectomy was performed in cases requiring LND in the domains of the middle colic artery and left colic artery. In other cases, a partial colectomy (PC) that was defined as a segmental resection of the splenic flexure with LND in the domains of the feeding arteries was performed. Surgical and oncological outcomes were compared between PC and left hemicolectomy. RESULTS: Preoperative 3D-CTA enabled the evaluation of the feeding artery in all patients. PC was performed in 51 patients (83.6%). Patients who underwent PC had a shorter operative time (p=0.03) and less blood loss (p=0.01). There was no difference in complications between the two groups. There was also no significant difference in 5-year overall survival, nor 3-year disease free survival. CONCLUSION: Preoperative simulation using 3D-CTA has the potential to be useful in the identification of feeding arteries and determination of the oncologically adequate extent of LND for each patient.

Inferior mesenteric arteriovenous malformation extending to splenic flexure colonic wall presenting with massive lower gastrointestinal bleeding, a case report.

INTRODUCTION AND IMPORTANCE: An arteriovenous malformation (AVM) in the inferior mesenteric artery is a rare vascular pathology that accounts for 6 % of the causes of gastrointestinal bleeding. AVMs are typically classified as congenital persisting embryonic vasculature that link both systems and do not develop into arteries or veins [3], but they may also develop later in life. The majority of documented cases are iatrogenic after colon surgery. CASE PRESENTATION: Herein we describe a 56-year-old man who presented complaining of fresh blood per rectum with passage of clots not related to defecation with no previous similar episodes, he was found to have extensive inferior mesenteric branches AVM invading the colonic splenic flexure via Computed Tomography (CT) angiography following three non-revealing upper and lower endoscopies which was later managed surgically with left hemicolectomy with primary end to end colo-colic anastomosis. CLINICAL DISCUSSION: Although AVMs seldom manifest in multiple sites through the gastrointestinal tract, it is more prevalent in the stomach, small intestine, and ascending colon, and very unusual to affect the Inferior mesenteric artery and vein and to extend to the splenic flexure colonic wall. CONCLUSION: Even if rare, inferior mesenteric AVMs should be suspected in a patient presenting with GI Bleeding with unrevealing endoscopies, where CT Angiography is to be considered.

Surgical management of splenic flexure cancer: is there an optimal technique? A bi-national registry analysis.

BACKGROUND: Splenic flexure tumours (SFC) are uncommon and present at more advanced disease stages. The optimal surgical technique for SFC remains controversial. We sought to compare the short-term outcomes of a left hemicolectomy (LHC) versus an extended resection (subtotal colectomy, STC) for SFCs. METHODS: A retrospective analysis using the Binational Colorectal Cancer Audit (BCCA) registry was performed. All patients with SFC who underwent elective or emergency surgery for a SFC between 2010 and 2021 were included. Primary outcomes included short-term inpatient complications. Secondary outcomes included survival outcomes. RESULTS: Six hundred and ninety-nine patients underwent resections for SFCs. A LHC was more common, performed in 64.1%. Patients having a LHC were significantly older, with proportionally more LHCs done laparoscopically. Overall grade III/IV complications were similar between both operations. Prolonged ileus and return to theatre were significantly higher in patients undergoing a STC. On multivariate analysis, anastomotic leak and overall grade III/IV complications were not independently associated with the type of operation. There was no difference in medial survival based on type of operation. Higher tumour stage (Stage III/IV) were independently associated with worse survival. CONCLUSION: Segmental and extended resections are both oncologically sound procedures for SFCs. Segmental resections are associated with lower rates of prolonged ileus.