Evaluation of Negative Pressure Dressings for Closed Surgical Incisions in Decreasing Surgical Site Infections After Emergency Laparotomy: A Randomized Controlled Study.

Objectives The aim of this study is to compare the effectiveness of negative pressure dressings (NPDs) versus conventional dressings for closed surgical incisions after emergency midline laparotomy, focusing on their impact on surgical site infection (SSI) rates, wound dehiscence, hospital stay duration, and cosmetic outcomes. Methods The randomized controlled study was conducted over 24 months, involving 80 patients aged 18-65 years who had peritonitis and underwent emergency midline laparotomies. Patients with diabetes mellitus, a BMI >35 kg/m², immunocompromised conditions, or those requiring re-exploration within 30 days of surgery were excluded. The participants were randomly assigned into two groups using a computer-generated randomization table: Group A, the case group, consisted of 40 patients who received NPDs, while Group B, the control group, included 40 patients who received conventional dressings. Data were recorded in Microsoft Excel (Microsoft Corporation, Redmond, WA, USA) and analyzed using IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 25.0 (Released 2017; IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA), with a p-value of <0.05 considered statistically significant. Results The overall occurrence of SSIs within the 30-day follow-up period was significantly lower in the NPD group compared to the conventional dressing group (30% vs. 70%, p < 0.05). The mean duration of hospital stay was 14.85 ± 10.43 days for the NPD group and 15.4 ± 9.75 days for the control group, with no statistically significant difference (p = 0.712). The mean Vancouver Scar Scale score was 5.3 ± 2.47 in the NPD group and 6.5 ± 2.14 in the control group, also showing no statistically significant difference (p = 0.11). Conclusions NPDs significantly reduced the incidence of SSIs compared to conventional dressings, but they did not have a significant impact on scar cosmesis or the duration of hospital stay.

Microbiological Profile of Instrumented Spinal Infections: 10-Year Study at a French Spine Center.

OBJECTIVE: The objective was to compare the microbiological characteristics and treatment of early and late surgical site infections (SSIs) in instrumented spinal surgery. METHODS: Those patients admitted for SSIs in a single center between January 2010 and December 2022 were included. The subjects were divided into early (eSSIs) and late (lSSIs) SSIs, and demographic, microbiological, treatment, and follow-up data were collected. RESULTS: Instrumented spinal surgery was performed in 2136 patients. Ninety-six cases of infections were identified (prevalence = 4.5%), with 47.9% eSSIs and 52.1% lSSIs. In 58.7% of the cases, the eSSIs were monomicrobial: Staphylococcus aureus (37%) and Enterobacterales (33.3%) were the main bacteria involved. In 66% of the cases, the lSSIs, were monomicrobial: Cutibacterium acnes (30.3%) and staphylococci were predominant. Enterobacterales were isolated in more than 70% of the polymicrobial samples in both the eSSIs and lSSIs. The treatment of the eSSIs mostly consisted of lavage-debridement surgery associated with antibiotic treatment, while the treatment of the lSSIs combined hardware removal or replacement and long-duration antibiotic treatment. A negative outcome was observed in 17.1% of the eSSIs and 5.7% of the lSSIs. Enterobacterales were associated with negative outcomes of eSSIs. CONCLUSIONS: Enterobacterales were found in most of the polymicrobial infections regardless of the time of infection onset. Further large studies should be conducted to precisely determine the management and prevention regarding the increasing Gram-negative bacteria SSIs.

Is Taurolidine Irrigation Effective in Preventing Surgical Site Infection during Fracture Surgery?

Taurolidine, known for its broad-spectrum antimicrobial properties and low toxicity, has shown promise in reducing infections in various surgical settings. However, it has not been extensively evaluated in orthopedic surgery. This study assessed the efficacy of taurolidine irrigation in reducing surgical site infections in patients undergoing ankle fracture surgery. A retrospective review was conducted for patients >20 years old who underwent ankle fracture surgery between March 2016 and March 2023, with follow-ups exceeding 6 months. Patients were classified into the following two groups: those who underwent normal saline (NS) irrigation and those who underwent taurolidine irrigation. Minor infections were defined as requiring additional oral antibiotics postoperatively, while major infections were characterized by hospitalization or reoperation due to infection within 3 months. Of 844 patients, 688 were included. The taurolidine group (n = 328) had a significant reduction in minor infections (7.3% vs. 22.5%, odds ratio = 0.410, p = 0.028) compared to the NS group (n = 360). Major infections were fewer in the NS group (1.2% vs. 0%, p = 0.051), but the number of cases was too small for reliable analysis. Taurolidine irrigation significantly reduces the occurrence of minor infections in ankle fracture surgeries when compared to normal saline irrigation.

The use of biologic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs does not increase surgical site infection or delayed wound healing after orthopaedic surgeries for rheumatoid arthritis.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effect of the use of biologic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) on surgical site infection (SSI) and delayed wound healing (DWH) in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients undergoing orthopaedic surgery. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the records of 965 elective orthopaedic procedures undertaken in RA patients. The incidences of SSI and DWH were compared between the bDMARDs user and non-user groups. Subsequently, univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to evaluate risk factors for SSI and DWH after propensity score (PS) matching. The incidence of postoperative flare-up was also examined. RESULTS: In 965 procedures, SSI and DWH were identified in 12 and 28 cases, respectively. SSI and DWH were identified in 3 and 17 of 414 procedures treated with bDMARDs, respectively. Flare-up occurred in 21 cases. PS matching identified 315 cases in both groups, with no significant difference in incidence between the two groups. No risk factors for SSI were identified, whereas age, diabetes mellitus, foot and ankle surgery and a history of musculoskeletal-related infection were identified as risk factors for DWH. CONCLUSION: The use of bDMARDs was not associated with an increased incidence of SSI or DWH, with the incidence of flare-up being relatively low.

Drapes in Routine Aseptic Procedures for Environmental Sustainability (project DRAPES): a protocol for a multi-centre randomised controlled trial comparing post-operative wound complication rates following routine neutering of dogs and cats using reusable or disposable surgical drapes.

BACKGROUND: Reusable surgical drapes have a lower lifetime environmental impact than disposable drapes in most cases. There is limited evidence regarding whether drape choice impacts patient outcomes including post-operative wound complications. The aim of this study is to compare wound complication rates following routine neutering surgeries in cats and dogs when reusable drapes are used as compared with disposable drapes. METHODS: The trial will be conducted as a pragmatic, multi-centre, parallel group randomised controlled trial in the UK. Dogs and cats undergoing routine neutering will be randomised to disposable or reusable drapes with all other aspects of care occurring as they usually would at the practice. The required sample size is 2,850, with 4750 animals to be recruited from up to ten practices to allow for a 40% loss to follow-up. Demographic data and details on peri-operative care will be collected at the time of surgery. Post-operative wound complications will be assessed and recorded as usual at each practice using clinical codes. The post-operative wound clinical codes and any antibiotic use within 30 days of surgery will be retrieved from the practice management software. The primary outcome that will be compared between the two groups is the rate of post-operative wound complications within 30 days of surgery which will be analysed by multivariable logistic regression with a binary outcome of wound complication (yes/no). Secondary outcomes are the prevalence of different types of complications and antibiotic use within 30 days of surgery which will be compared between the two groups by chi square analysis. DISCUSSION: Our hypothesis is that there will be no difference in post-operative wound complication rates between disposable and reusable drapes. If the likely rate of post-surgical wound complications with reusable drapes is similar to that with disposable drapes, then veterinary clinical teams can choose the more sustainable option, confident that their patients will not be impacted by this choice. TRIAL REGISTRATION: We have retrospectively registered the protocol on the Open Science Framework on 14 Nov 2023 (Trial registration entry: https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/72HMA ).

Groin Complications Among Obese Patients Undergoing Vascular Procedures.

OBJECTIVES: Groin incision wound complications (WC) are common among vascular surgery patients. Obesity is a known risk factor, but there is no consensus on the best way to prevent WC in obese patients after vascular procedures. The objective of this study was to identify risk factors for WC and strategies to prevent these complications specifically in obese patients. METHODS: All patients who had longitudinal groin incisions at a single institution from 2021-2022 were included. The medical records were reviewed and all groin-related WC were identified. WC were stratified into major and minor WC where major WC were those requiring re-operation or hospital re-admission. Patients were stratified into obese (BMI>30kg/m2) and non-obese cohorts. RESULTS: A total of 238 groin incisions were included. There were 46 (19.3%) obese and 192(80.7%) non-obese patients. 156 (65.5%) were closed with nylon, 49 (20.6%) were closed in a subcuticular fashion, and 32 (13.4%) were closed with staples. There were 45 (18.9%) WC; 15 (33.3%) major and 30 (66.7 %) minor. Obesity was associated with a higher WC rate (39.1% vs 14.1%, p<0.001), which was driven by minor WC (32.6% vs 7.8%, p<0.001) rather than major WC (6.5% vs 5.7%, p=0.873). On multivariable analysis, obesity remained a predictor for overall (OR 4.953, p<0.001) and minor WC (OR 7.389, p<0.001). Additionally, female sex was associated with a higher rate of WC on unadjusted (27.6% vs 12.8%, p=0.016) and adjusted analysis (OR 2.411, p=0.014). Among obese patients, subcuticular closure was associated with higher rates of minor complications (OR 8.454, p=0.044). Obese patients with major complications less frequently had close follow-up including rehab disposition, discharge with visiting nurse, or frequent office wound checks than those with minor complications (33.33% vs 86.67%, p=0.043). CONCLUSIONS: Groin WC are more common in obese and female patients. Among obese patients, this difference is driven primarily by minor WC. Avoiding a subcuticular skin closure may reduce the risk of minor WC in obese patients. In addition, close postoperative follow up using rehab, visiting nurse services, and frequent office wound checks may prevent minor complications from escalating to major complications.

Randomized Controlled Trial: Does the Use of Occlusive Hydrocolloid Silver-Containing Wound Dressing after Sternotomy Reduce Surgical Site Infection after Cardiac Surgery?

(1) Background: To reduce the incidence of surgical site infections (SSIs) following median sternotomy in cardiac surgery, we compared an occlusive hydrocolloid silver-containing wound dressing (OHSCWD) with a standard wound dressing. (2) Methods: This study was designed as a single-center randomized controlled trial. The primary endpoint was the overall rate of incidence of any kind of SSI. Secondary endpoints were the number of dressing changes, the severity of SSIs, and whether there was a need for treatment. Wounds were monitored daily until the seventh and on the 30th postoperative day. (3) Results: Of the 423 patients included, 352 were analyzed. No differences in demographics, cardiovascular risk factors, intraoperative processes, and postoperative care were found between both groups. Additionally, the incidence or extent of SSI showed no significant differences between the two groups. (4) Conclusions: In summary, out of all pre-, intra-, and postoperative factors, the contribution of postoperative wound care to the development of SSIs appears to play a subordinate role. However, by offering equivalent wound protection and a reduced number of dressing changes, OHSCWD after median sternotomy in cardiac surgery patients could be a good alternative to standard dressings from the point of view of the patient, the staff, and the clinic.

Pre-Operative Mechanical Bowel Preparation Does Not Affect the Impact of Anastomosis Leakage in Left-Side Colorectal Surgery-A Single Center Observational Study.

Despite rapid advances in colorectal surgery, morbidity and mortality rates in elective gastrointestinal surgery play a significant role. For decades, there have been tempestuous discussions on preventative measures to minimize the risk of anastomotic dehiscence. When mechanical bowel preparation before an elective procedure, one of the key hypotheses, was introduced into practice, it was assumed that it would decrease the number of infectious complications and anastomotic dehiscence. The advancements in antibiotic treatment supported the concomitant administration of oral antibiotics and mechanical bowel preparation. In the prospective study conducted at our clinic, we performed left-side colorectal procedures without prior mechanical preparation. All patients enrolled in the study underwent the surgery and were observed in the 3rd Surgical Clinic, Faculty of Medicine, Comenius University in Bratislava, Slovakia, from January 2019 to January 2020. As a control group, we used a similar group of patients with MBP. Our observed group included 87 patients with tumors in the left part of their large intestine (lineal flexure, descendent colon, sigmoid colon, and rectum). Dixon laparoscopic resection was performed in 26 patients. Sigmoid laparoscopic resection was performed in 27 patients. In 12 patients, the procedure was started laparoscopically but had to be converted due to adverse anatomical conditions. The conservative approaches mostly included Dixon resections (19 patients), sigmoid colon resections (5 patients), left-side hemicolectomies (6 patients), and Miles' tumor resections, with rectal amputation (4 patients). Our study highlighted the fact that MBP does not have an unequivocal benefit for patients with colorectal infection, which has an impact on the development of anastomotic dehiscence.

Role of Oral Veillonella Species in Predicting Surgical Site Infections After Maxillofacial Trauma: A Prospective Observational Study.

INTRODUCTION: There are comparatively fewer surgical site infections after craniofacial trauma than after trauma to the extremities, and the etiology is complex. Gram-negative facultative anaerobic bacteria Veillonella is a common commensal in the oral cavity and has been linked to osteomyelitis and surgical site infections in prosthetic joint infections. They serve as early biological indicators. AIMS/OBJECTIVES: This study aims to assess the presence of Veillonella in patients presenting with maxillofacial trauma, to document the difference in colony count in patients requiring surgical intervention at different time intervals as against patients with surgical site infections, and to provide better hospital care and management so as to improve the standard of care with an attempt to prevent the possibility of postoperative surgical site infections. METHODOLOGY: In this study, individuals with trauma/fractures of the maxillofacial region requiring surgical intervention at varied time spans, early, intermediate, and late, were included. After obtaining informed consent, the examination was done; the fracture type and site were noted, and a swab was taken on the day of admission, on the day of surgery, and on the day of discharge and given for microbiological evaluation. Findings were recorded. RESULTS: The primary and secondary objectives of the study were established. The mean colony count in colony-forming units/milliliter for patients undergoing early surgical intervention, on the day of admission, was 2.01E+0.6. On the day of discharge, the mean colony count was 1.51E+0.6. In contrast, for patients with surgical site infection, on the day of admission, the mean was 6.5E+0.7, and on the day of discharge, the mean colony count reduced to 4.01E+0.6. The time-colony-forming unit graph showed a difference in the colony count of Veillonella in patients operated at different time intervals as against patients with surgical site infection and modified relation with a number of other oral commensals. The colony count in patients with osteomyelitis was found and compared. CONCLUSION: There is a change in the colony count of Veillonella species and its relation to their commensals when intervened at different time intervals. Our study indicates that the estimation of Veillonella species and the colony count could aid in determining the possibility of a surgical site infection. This study also stresses on the appropriate reporting of maxillofacial trauma in cases of a poly-trauma for appropriate management.

Risk factors for incisional hernia after open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: The incidence of incisional hernia (IH) after an open abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair can reach up to 35%, contributing to long-term morbidity. Individual studies have been limited in identifying modifiable risk factors for IH after an open AAA repair. This meta-analysis aims to review all the risk factors for IH after an open AAA repair. METHODS: We searched Cochrane Central, Embase, PubMed, MEDLINE, and Web of Science databases for original studies. Risk factors assessed were age, sex, comorbidities, surgical incision, blood loss, and surgical site infection (SSI). Data analysis was done using RStudio 4.1.2. We computed Relative Risk (RR) for dichotomous outcomes and Mean differences (MD) with 95% Confidence Interval (CI) for continuous outcomes. P-values less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant. RESULTS: Ten studies met the inclusion criteria among 1,795 screened articles. Among those ten studies, there were a total of 1,806 patients of which 341 patients developed IH. Older age (Mean 69.6-70.7 years, MD 1.39 years, CI [1.12-1.66], P < 0.01), midline vertical incision (RR 1.55, CI [1.06-2.25], P = 0.02) and increased intraoperative blood loss (MD 429.8 ml, CI [234.8- 624.8], P < 0.01) were associated with an increased incidence of IH. Surgical site infection (SSI) was noted as a risk factor for IH after open AAA repair (RR 2.36, CI [1.31-4.24], P = 0.004). No statistically significant association was found between the incidence of IH and sex (RR 1.0, CI [0.8-1.14], P = 0.98), smoking (RR 1.01, CI [0.93-1.09], P = 0.88), diabetes (RR 1.38, CI [0.85-2.25], P = 0.19), and chronic kidney disease (RR 1.55, CI [0.47-5.09], P = 0.46). CONCLUSION: This meta-analysis shows that age, midline vertical incision, intraoperative blood loss, and SSI are risk factors for IH after open AAA repair.

Need for a targeted perioperative antibiotic treatment protocol for patients with preoperative biliary drainage undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the bacterobilia in patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) based on whether they carry a preoperative biliary drainage or not and to analyse if a targeted perioperative antibiotic treatment based on the expected microbiology leads in no differences in Surgical Site Infections (SSI) between the groups. METHODS: Retrospective observational single-center study of patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy with preoperative biliary stent (group P, Prosthesis) and without stent (group NP, No Prosthesis). Postoperative complications including SSI and its subtypes were analyzed after applying a targeted perioperative antibiotic treatment protocol with cefotaxime and metronidazole (group NP) and piperacillin-tazobactam (group P). RESULTS: Between January 2014 and December 2021, 127 patients were treated (84 in group NP and 43 in group P). Intraoperative cultures were positive in 16.7% (group NP) vs 76.7% (group P, p < 0.01). Microorganisms isolated in group NP included Enterobacterales (10.7%) and Enterococcus spp. (7.1%) with no Candida detected. In group P: Enterobacterales (51.2%), Enterococcus spp. (48.8%), and Candida (16.3%) were higher (p < 0.01%). No differences in morbidity and mortality were observed between the groups. SSI rate was 17.8% in group NP and 23.2% in group P (ns). CONCLUSION: Bacterobilia differs in patients with biliary drainage, showing a higher presence of Enterobacterales, Enterococcus spp., and Candida. There were no differences in SSI incidence after applying perioperative antibiotic treatment tailored to the expected microorganisms in each group. This raises the need to reconsider conventional surgical prophylaxis in patients with biliary stent.

A Clinical Study of Anterior Abdominal Wall Hernias and Its Management: A Medical College Experience.

Objective We aim to evaluate the various risk factors contributing to the occurrence of anterior abdominal wall hernias and assess the various surgical modalities. Materials and methods This prospective observational research was conducted between 2022 and 2024 at a tertiary care health center, involving 100 participants with an anterior abdominal wall hernia diagnosis aged over 14 years. The study excluded patients under 14 years with bleeding diathesis, inherited coagulopathies, inguinal or femoral hernias, or recurrent ventral hernias. Participants underwent detailed clinical examinations and biochemical evaluations and underwent a primary ultrasonography (USG)/contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT) to determine defect size. Risk factors were documented, including age, gender, occupation, body mass index (BMI), comorbidities, previous surgery history, multiparity, smoking, chronic straining due to constipation or benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), malnutrition, chronic steroid use, chronic renal failure, and chronic liver disease. The surgical procedure was determined by the same surgical team for all cases. Standard antibiotic prophylaxis and preoperative painting/draping protocols were followed in all cases. Intraoperatively, intraoperative time (in hours) was documented. Postoperative parameters included pain, hematoma formation, seroma formation, surgical site infections (SSIs), and early recurrence. These intra- and postoperative findings constituted the primary outcome parameters. Secondary outcome parameters included hospital stay duration and time taken to return to work. Data analysis was performed using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) version 16 (IBM SPSS Statistics, Armonk, NY) software. Results The study analyzed the occurrence of ventral hernias in 100 patients, with the fourth decade having the highest occurrence (n=42 (42%)). The majority of the participants were male (female: n=47 (47%), male: n=53 (53%)). The majority of the participants were laborers, and 24% (n=24) were office workers. The study found that hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease were risk factors for hernias. Other risk factors included obesity, previous history of surgery, multiparity, smoking, chronic straining, malnutrition, and chronic steroid use. The most common type of ventral hernia was umbilical hernia (n=33 (33%)), followed by paraumbilical hernias (n=30 (30%)), and incisional hernias (n=20 (20%)). Of the 100 patients, 74% underwent open hernia repair, with the mean operation time being minimal in cases managed with laparoscopic repair (2.5±0.67 hours). Postoperative pain was highest with the Rives-Stoppa (RS) repair with component separation group. The incidence of surgical site infection was the maximum among cases of open anatomical repair (41.7%), followed by RS repair (31.3%), while it was the minimum in laparoscopic repair (3.7%). Early recurrence was lower in the laparoscopic group (n=1 (3.7%)). Conclusion The study highlights risk factors for abdominal wall hernia and management approaches. Understanding these is crucial for identifying and preventing recurrence. Surgeons must choose the right surgical approach based on patient health and symptoms to achieve desired outcomes and minimize complications. In addition, surgical expertise, availability of resources, and knowledge of what works best for the surgeon constitute important determinants of surgical outcomes.

Antibiotic administration for open reduction internal fixation of closed ankle fractures: Is one preoperative dose enough?

Although preoperative antibiotics are used routinely in ankle fracture surgery, there is considerable variability in postoperative antibiotic dosing regimens amongst surgeons. The aim of this study is to compare the rate of surgical site infection (SSI) in patients receiving one dose of preoperative antibiotics to patients who received more than one dose of antibiotics. A single-center Level I Trauma Center retrospective review of patients with isolated closed ankle fractures who underwent open reduction internal fixation over a 10-year period was performed. Demographics data and risk factors were obtained from the electronic medical record. SSI was detected using a text-mining algorithm on all postoperative clinic notes. Factors associated with the development of SSI or increased antibiotic dosing were evaluated. Eight-hundred and twenty-six patients were included in the analysis. There was no correlation between infection rate and any of the potential risk factors evaluated. Two-hundred and ninety-two patients received only one dose of antibiotics preoperatively and 534 patients received more than one antibiotic dose. The rate of SSI was not significantly different between the single-dose cohort (5.8 %) and the multi-dose cohort (3.9 %) (p=0.215). Routine use of postoperative antibiotics in open reduction internal fixation of closed ankle fractures did not decrease the rate of SSI, regardless of associated comorbidities. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: : Level III (therapeutic retrospective cohort study).

Do We Need Preoperative Antibiotics in Common General Pediatric Surgery Procedures?

Background There are limited studies on the necessity of preoperative antibiotics in surgeries for undescended testis (UDT), inguinal hernia (IH), and umbilical hernia (UH) in children. Here, we investigated the relationship between preoperative antibiotic use and surgical site infection (SSI) incidence in surgeries for UDT, IH, and UH in children. Methods Patients who underwent surgery for IH were subdivided based on the surgical form into those who underwent (i) open IH (OIH) repair and (ii) laparoscopic percutaneous extraperitoneal closure (LPEC). Medical records of patients who underwent surgeries for UDT and IH or UH were retrospectively examined. The SSI incidence was compared between patients receiving and not receiving preoperative antibiotics. In patients who underwent surgery for UH or LPEC, the relative risk of SSI postoperatively in the inguinal region (including surgery for UDT and OIH repair) was examined. Results In total, 926 patients with 1389 wounds were included in this study. SSI rates in patients who underwent surgeries for UDT and UH, OIH repair, and LPEC were 0.2% and 2.7%, 0.3%, and 0.4%, respectively. These rates were not significantly different between patients receiving and not receiving preoperative antibiotics. In patients who underwent surgery for UH, the relative risk of SSI was statistically significant at 9.8 compared with that in patients who underwent surgeries in the inguinal region (95% CI = 1.3-74; p = 0.013). Conclusions Preoperative antibiotics are unnecessary in surgeries for UDT and OIH repair. Patients undergoing surgery for UH should be given extensive care as they are at a high risk of SSI.

Butyrylcholinesterase levels correlate with surgical site infection risk and severity after colorectal surgery: a prospective single-center study.

Introduction: Surgical site infections (SSIs) after colorectal surgery remain a significant concern, which warrants effective predictive markers for prompt diagnosis and treatment. Butyrylcholinesterase (BChE), a non-specific cholinesterase enzyme, has been correlated with the risk of hepatic dysfunction progression and, more recently, infectious diseases and septic shock with ongoing research into the utility of BChE in multiple systemic inflammatory conditions. Whether these preliminary results can be translated into predicting infection after colorectal surgery remains in remains in question. This prospective study aimed to assess BChE's potential as a predictive marker for surgical site infections and anastomotic leaks after colorectal surgery. Materials and methods: This single-center prospective study (11/2019-05/2023) enrolled 402 patients who underwent colorectal surgery. BChE levels were measured at four postoperative time points. The primary endpoints focused on BChE's association with complications, particularly surgical site infections (SSIs). Further known predictors of SSI were utilized to construct multivariable models to assess for independent association with SSI development. Results: During the third and fifth day postsurgery, SSI patients had significantly lower mean BChE levels (3.90 KU/L vs. 4.54 KU/L p-value < 0.05, and 4.14 KU/L vs. 4.73 KU/L, p-value < 0.05; t-test, respectively). However, multivariate analysis revealed that when adjusted for other factors, low BChE levels on the first postoperative day were associated with 2.6 times higher odds of developing SSI (OR: 2.6, 95%CI: 1.3-3.9, p-value < 0.05). Similar results were found for low BChE levels on the third postoperative day as they were associated with a. 2.53 times higher odds for developing SSI (OR: 2.5, 95%CI: 1.27-3.87, p-value < 0.05) when adjusted for other factors. Conclusion: In conclusion, in this prospective observational study, low levels in the first and third postsurgery were associated with an increased risk for the development of SSIs but not sepsis.

Assessing the impact of enhanced hygiene precautions during the COVID-19 pandemic on surgical site infection risk in abdominal surgeries.

BACKGROUND: A surgical site infection (SSI) is a postoperative infection that occurs at or near the surgical incision. SSIs significantly increase morbidity, mortality, length of hospital stay, and healthcare costs. The World Health Organization (WHO) has established hospital hygiene precaution guidelines for the prevention of SSIs, which were enhanced during the COVID-19 pandemic. The current study aims to explore the effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on SSI incidence among initially uninfected postoperative patients. We hypothesize that these enhanced precautions would reduce the incidence of SSIs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective study comparing surgical outcomes before and during the pandemic. Patients who had abdominal surgery between June and December 2019 (Non-COVID-19) or between February and June 2020 (COVID-19) were included. The two groups were matched in a 1:1 ratio based on age, Sex, acuity (elective or emergent), surgical approach, and comorbidities. Electronic medical records were reviewed to identify SSIs and hospital readmissions within 30 days after surgery. Pearson's chi-square test and Fisher's exact test were used. RESULTS: Data was collected and analyzed from 976 patients who had surgery before the COVID-19 pandemic (non-COVID group) and 377 patients who had surgery during the pandemic (COVID group). After matching, there were 377 patients in each group. In our study, we found 23 surgical site infections (SSIs) in both laparoscopic and open surgeries. The incidence of SSIs was significantly higher in the non-COVID period compared to the COVID period [17 cases (4.5%) vs. 6 cases (1.6%), respectively, p = 0.032], especially in non-COVID open surgeries. The incidence of SSIs in laparoscopic surgeries was also higher during the non-COVID period, but not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: Enhanced hygiene precautions during the COVID -19 pandemic may have reduced SSIs rates following abdominal surgery.

Prediction models for risk assessment of surgical site infection after spinal surgery: A systematic review.

Background: Spinal surgeries are a common procedure, but there is significant risk of adverse events following these operations. While the rate of adverse events ranges from 8% to 18%, surgical site infections (SSIs) alone occur in between 1% and 4% of spinal surgeries. Methods: We completed a systematic review addressing factors that contribute to surgical site infection after spinal surgery. From the included studies, we separated the articles into groups based on whether they propose a clinical predictive tool or model. We then compared the prediction variables, model development, model validation, and model performance. Results: About 47 articles were included in this study: 10 proposed a model and 5 validated a model. The models were developed from 7,720 participants in total and 210 participants with SSI. Only one of the proposed models was externally validated by an independent group. The other 4 validation papers examined the performance of the ACS NSQIP surgical risk calculator. Conclusions: While some preoperative risk models have been validated, and even successfully implemented clinically, the significance of postoperative SSIs and the unique susceptibility of spine surgery patients merits the development of a spine-specific preoperative risk model. Additionally, comprehensive and stratified risk modeling for SSI would be of invaluable clinical utility and greatly improve the field of spine surgery.

Intraoperative wound irrigation to prevent surgical site infection: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

INTRODUCTION: The potential benefit of intraoperative wound irrigation (IOWI) in preventing surgical site infection (SSI) remains unclear. The use of antimicrobial agents (AMA) or antiseptic agents (ASA) is controversial worldwide. METHODS: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials comparing AMA or ASA with saline solution in patients who underwent abdominal surgery. Sub-analyses were performed on the type of surgery, type of intervention agent, and wound classification. RESULTS: Nineteen studies comprising 4915 patients undergoing abdominal surgery were included. SSI was observed in 207 out of 2504 patients in the intervention group (8.26 %) and 344 out of 2411 patients in the control group (14.27%). Overall, intraoperative wound irrigation (IOWI) with AMA or ASA was associated with a lower SSI (Odds ratio (OR) 0.62; 95% CI 0.47, 0.82; p < 0.01; I2 = 50%). Sub-analyses have shown a tendency for decreased SSI in patients from emergency surgery (OR 0.46; 95% CI 0.30, 0.70; p < 0.01; I2 = 23%), patients with contaminated wound (OR 0.48; 95% CI 0.31, 0.74; p < 0.01; I2 = 24%), and either the use of AMA or ASA (OR 0.53 vs. 0.65). CONCLUSION: The overall use of AMA or ASA before skin closure was associated with decreased SSI. Lower rates of SSI were observed in the subgroup analysis. Furthermore, we must consider the critical heterogeneity of the studies.