Comparing Severity of Knee Arthritis at an Urban Center by Insurance Type Prior to Total Knee Arthroplasty.

This study compares radiographic osteoarthritis severity prior with total knee arthroplasty (TKA) by payer type. Five hundred and three primary TKAs were included. Preoperative radiographs were scored by Ahlback, Kellgren-Lawrence (KL), and International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) classifications. Osteoarthritis severity by age and insurance type (private, Medicare, and Medicaid) were compared using Mann Whitney U and Kruskal-Wallis testing. Three hundred and two (60%) subjects were under 65 years old, and 201 (40%) were 65 years and older. Younger subjects had no differences in radiographic severity in KL (p = 0.268), Ahlback (p = 1), or IKDC (p = 0.948) classification by insurance. Older subjects also had no differences in osteoarthritis severity for KL (p = 0.282), Ahlback (p = 0.354), or IKDC (p = 0.735) classifications by insurance. Three osteoarthritis classification systems found no difference in preoperative radiographic changes by payor type, suggesting that, in the study's population, there is no delay in appropriate surgical treatment by payer. Future studies should compare preoperative clinical symptoms. (Journal of Surgical Orthopaedic Advances 33(3):184-188, 2024).

[Total knee replacement in patients under 60 years with high functional demand: functional outcomes and return to sports after an average 2-year follow-up]. / Reemplazo total de rodilla en pacientes menores de 60 años con demanda funcional elevada: resultados funcionales y retorno al deporte después de un promedio de dos años de seguimiento.

INTRODUCTION: a common concern in presurgical medical appointment of total knee replacement medical appointment is return to exercise. The purpose of this study was to analyze functional results and return to sport in patients under 60 years of age after this surgery. MATERIAL AND METHODS: we retrospectively analyzed 41 total knee replacements in 36 athletic patients (average age: 53 years [46-60]). Average follow-up of two years (6 months-5 years). Diagnoses: 37 osteoarthritis, three sequelae of Rheumatoid Arthritis, 1 extra-articular deformity. Functional and radiographic outcomes assessed using modified Knee Society and High Activity Arthroplasty Scores. RESULTS: average improvement from 31.95 to 91.61 in KSS and average from 7.95 to 13.73 in HAAS. Return to sport in 3.5 months average (range 2-6 months). Three patients did not return to sport. CONCLUSIONS: we consider that delaying surgery in these patients will cause progression in their osteoarthritis pathology and cessation of their sports activities. This makes the surgical technique difficult in addition to reducing the patient's physical performance. Analyzing the survival rate of implants in young patients, more than 80% is reported in a 25-year follow-up.

INTRODUCCIÓN: una inquietud frecuente en consultas prequirúrgicas de reemplazo total de rodilla es el regreso al ejercicio. El propósito de este estudio fue analizar resultados funcionales y retorno al deporte en pacientes menores de 60 años posterior a esta cirugía. MATERIAL Y MÉTODOS: analizamos retrospectivamente 41 reemplazos totales de rodilla en 36 pacientes deportistas (edad promedio: 53 años [46-60]). Seguimiento promedio de dos años (6 meses-5 años). Diagnósticos: 37 gonartrosis, tres secuelas de artritis reumatoidea, una deformidad extraarticular. Resultados funcionales y radiográficos evaluados mediante Knee Society modificado y High Activity Arthroplasty Score. RESULTADOS: mejoría promedio de 31.95 a 91.61 en KSS y promedio de 7.95 a 13.73 en HAAS. Retorno al deporte en 3.5 meses promedio (rango: 2-6 meses). Tres pacientes no retornaron al deporte. CONCLUSIONES: consideramos que el retraso de la cirugía en estos pacientes producirá progresión en su patología artrósica y cese de sus actividades deportivas. Esto dificulta la técnica quirúrgica además de disminuir el rendimiento físico del paciente. Analizando la tasa de supervivencia de implantes en pacientes jóvenes, se reporta más de 80% en seguimientos de 25 años.

Incidence of psychiatric disorders after total knee or hip arthroplasty by anesthesia type: A nationwide cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Evidence is lacking of an association between anesthetic choice and the risk of psychiatric disorders. Therefore, this study aimed to examine the impact of regional anesthesia (R/A) versus general anesthesia (G/A) on the occurrence of psychiatric disorders in patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty (TKA) or total hip arthroplasty (THA). METHODS: Data for this population-based cohort study were sourced from the National Health Insurance Service of South Korea. The study included adult patients who underwent TKA or THA between January 1, 2016, and December 31, 2021. The endpoint was the diagnosis of postoperative psychiatric disorders within 1 year postoperative. RESULTS: This study included 411,967 patients who underwent THA or TKA. Among them, 290,476 (70.5 %) underwent THA or TKA under R/A (R/A group), while 121,491 (29.5 %) underwent THA or TKA under G/A (G/A group). In multivariate logistic regression, the R/A group had an 8 % lower incidence of postoperative psychiatric disorders (odds ratio [OR], 0.92; 95 % confidence interval [CI], 0.90-0.94; P < 0.001) than the G/A group. Specifically, a lower incidence of postoperative psychiatric disorder for depression (OR, 0.89; 95 % CI, 0.86-0.92; P < 0.001), bipolar disorder (OR, 0.88; 95 % CI, 0.83-0.94; P < 0.001), anxiety disorder (OR, 0.95; 95 % CI, 0.92-0.98; P = 0.001), and insomnia disorder (OR, 0.95; 95 % CI, 0.80-1.11; P = 0.496) was observed in the R/A versus G/A group. CONCLUSIONS: Among these South Korean patients who underwent TKA or THA, the R/A group had a lower incidence of postoperative psychiatric disorders than the G/A group.

Comparative analysis of patient-reported outcomes in total knee arthroplasty and total hip arthroplasty: adjusting for demographic influences.

PURPOSE: Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has consistently demonstrated lower patient satisfaction compared to total hip arthroplasty (THA). However, prior investigations failed to account for the patients' demographic characteristics. This study aimed to conduct a comparative analysis of patient-reported outcomes between TKA and THA while adjusting for patient background. METHODS: A total of 326 primary TKAs and 259 THAs conducted at a single center were assessed using Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) scores preoperatively and at 3 months, 1 year, and 2 years postoperatively. Notably, TKA patients exhibited advanced age and higher body mass index (BMI) than their THA counterparts. To mitigate the impact of these differences, we employed propensity score-matched data, adjusting for background characteristics such as age, gender, BMI, and diagnosis. RESULTS: THA consistently demonstrated significantly superior WOMAC total, pain, and stiffness scores compared to TKA at 3 months, 1 year, and 2 years postoperatively. Nevertheless, no statistically significant disparity in WOMAC physical function scores was observed between the two groups at 3 months and 1 year postoperatively in the matched data (3 months, p = 0.131; 1 year, p = 0.269). CONCLUSION: In contrast to earlier findings, our analysis of propensity score-matched data revealed no significant differences in WOMAC physical function scores between the TKA and THA groups at 3 months and 1 year postoperatively. The distinctive background factors observed in patients undergoing TKA and THA, notably advanced age and higher BMI, coupled with the delayed improvement timeline in TKA's WOMAC scores compared to that of THA, have the potential to impact patient-reported outcomes. Consequently, clinicians should be mindful of the potential impact of patient background on variations in patient-reported outcome measures following total joint arthroplasty.

Predicting prolonged length of stay following revision total knee arthroplasty: A national database analysis using machine learning models.

BACKGROUND: As the number of revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA) continues to rise, close attention has been paid to factors influencing postoperative length of stay (LOS). The aim of this study is to develop generalizable machine learning (ML) algorithms to predict extended LOS following revision TKA using data from a national database. METHODS: 23,656 patients undergoing revision TKA between 2013 and 2020 were identified using the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) database. Patients with missing data and those undergoing re-revision or conversion from unicompartmental knee arthroplasty were excluded. Four ML algorithms were applied and evaluated based on their (1) ability to distinguish between at-risk and not-at-risk patients, (2) accuracy, (3) calibration, and (4) clinical utility. RESULTS: All four ML predictive algorithms demonstrated good accuracy, calibration, clinical utility, and discrimination, with all models achieving a similar area under the curve (AUC) (AUCLR=AUCRF=AUCHGB=0.75, AUCANN=0.74). The most important predictors of prolonged LOS were found to be operative time, preoperative diagnosis of sepsis, and body mass index (BMI). CONCLUSIONS: ML models developed in this study demonstrated good performance in predicting extended LOS in patients undergoing revision TKA. Our findings highlight the importance of utilizing nationally representative patient data for model development. Prolonged operative time, preoperative sepsis, BMI, and elevated preoperative serum creatinine and BUN were noted to be significant predictors of prolonged LOS. Knowledge of these associations may aid with patient-specific preoperative planning, discharge planning, patient counseling, and cost containment with revision TKA.

Association between mandatory bundled payments and changes in socioeconomic disparities for joint replacement outcomes.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether mandatory participation by hospitals in bundled payments for lower extremity joint replacement (LEJR) was associated with changes in outcome disparities for patients dually eligible for Medicare and Medicaid. DATA SOURCES AND STUDY SETTING: We used Medicare claims data for beneficiaries undergoing LEJR in the United States between 2011 and 2017. STUDY DESIGN: We conducted a retrospective observational study using a differences-in-differences method to compare changes in outcome disparities between dual-eligible and non-dual eligible beneficiaries after hospital participation in the Comprehensive Care for Joint Replacement (CJR) program. The primary outcome was LEJR complications. Secondary outcomes included 90-day readmissions and mortality. DATA EXTRACTION METHODS: We identified hospitals in the US market areas eligible for CJR. We included beneficiaries in the intervention group who received joint replacement at hospitals in markets randomized to participate in CJR. The comparison group included patients who received joint replacement at hospitals in markets who were eligible for CJR but randomized to control. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: The study included 1,603,555 Medicare beneficiaries (mean age, 74.6 years, 64.3% women, 11.0% dual-eligible). Among participant hospitals, complications decreased between baseline and intervention periods from 11.0% to 10.1% for dual-eligible and 7.0% to 6.4% for non-dual-eligible beneficiaries. Among nonparticipant hospitals, complications decreased from 10.3% to 9.8% for dual-eligible and 6.7% to 6.0% for non-dual-eligible beneficiaries. In adjusted analysis, CJR participation was associated with a reduced difference in complications between dual-eligible and non-dual-eligible beneficiaries (-0.9 percentage points, 95% CI -1.6 to -0.1). The reduction in disparities was observed among hospitals without prior experience in a voluntary LEJR bundled payment model. There were no differential changes in 90-day readmissions or mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Mandatory participation in a bundled payment program was associated with reduced disparities in joint replacement complications for Medicare beneficiaries with low income. To our knowledge, this is the first evidence of reduced socioeconomic disparities in outcomes under value-based payments.

Evaluation of a Digital Decision Aid for Knee Replacement Surgery.

BACKGROUND: We studied whether an individualized digital decision aid can improve decision-making quality for or against knee arthroplasty. METHODS: An app-based decision aid (EKIT tool) was developed and studied in a stepped-wedge, cluster-randomized trial. Consecutive patients with knee osteoarthritis who were candidates for knee replacement were included in 10 centers in Germany. All subjects were asked via app on a tablet about their symptoms, prior treatments, and preferences and goals for treatment. For the subjects in the intervention group, the EKIT tool was used in the doctor-patient discussion to visualize the individual disease burden and degree of fulfillment of the indication criteria, and structured information on knee arthroplasty was provided. In the control group, the discussion was conducted without the EKIT tool in accordance with the local standard in each participating center. The primary endpoint was the quality of the patient's decision on the basis of the discussion of indications, as measured with the Hip and Knee Quality Decision Instrument (HK-DQI). (Registration number: ClinicalTrials.gov:NCT04837053). RESULTS: 1092 patients were included, and data from 1055 patients were analyzed (616 in the intervention group and 439 in the control group). Good decision quality, as rated by the HKDQI, was achieved by 86.0% of patients in the intervention group and 67.4% of patients in the control group (relative risk, 1.24; 95 % confidence interval, [1.15; 1.33]). CONCLUSION: A digital decision aid significantly improved the quality of decision-making for or against knee replacement surgery. The widespread use of this instrument may have an even larger effect, as this trial was conducted mainly in hospitals with high case numbers.

Incidence and survival of multiply revised knee arthroplasties in Denmark 1998-2021: a nationwide register-based study.

PURPOSE: The primary aim of our study was to identify the absolute incidence and implant survival of multiply revised knee arthroplasties based on nationwide register data. The secondary aim was to determine the change in the absolute incidence and implant survival of multiply revised knee arthroplasties Methods: We performed a retrospective observational study of primary knee arthroplasties using several nationwide Danish registers. All primary knee arthroplasties performed in Denmark from 1998 to 2021 were identified. From these primary arthroplasties, revision procedures were identified. Kaplan-Meier plots were used in survival analysis to estimate the likelihood of implant survival. RESULTS: 161,384 primary knee arthroplasties and their revisions performed between 1998 and 2021 were identified; of 13,786 (8.5%) revisions there were 10,638 1st revisions, 2,148 2nd revisions, 624 3rd revisions, 223 4th revisions, and 153 procedures that had been revised more than 4 times. The 10-year revision-free survival of primary arthroplasties was 92.3% (95% confidence interval [CI] 92.2-92.5). First-time revisions had a 10-year revision-free survival of 75.9% (CI 74.9-76.9). The 10-year survival of second- and third-time revisions was 65.1% (CI 62.6-67.6) and 57.8% (CI 53.4-62.5), respectively. The 10-year implant survival probabilities of primary knee arthroplasties were 91.4% in 1998-2009 and 93.3% in 2010-2021 (difference 2.2%). The 10-year implant survival probabilities of 1st revisions were 77% in 1998-2009 and 75% in 2010-2021 (difference -2.4%). CONCLUSION: We found that 0.3% of all primary knee arthroplasties resulted in 3 or more revisions. The implant survival decreased for each consecutive revision, with almost half of the 3rd revisions being re-revised within 10 years. The 10-survival of the primary implant was higher in 2010-2021, and the 10-year survival of the 1st revision was higher in 1998-2009.

Are social determinants of health associated with an increased length of hospitalization after revision total hip and knee arthroplasty? A comparison study of social deprivation indices.

INTRODUCTION: Length of stay (LOS) has been extensively assessed as a marker for healthcare utilization, functional outcomes, and cost of care for patients undergoing arthroplasty. The notable patient-to-patient variation in LOS following revision hip and knee total joint arthroplasty (TJA) suggests a potential opportunity to reduce preventable discharge delays. Previous studies investigated the impact of social determinants of health (SDoH) on orthopaedic conditions and outcomes using deprivation indices with inconsistent findings. The aim of the study is to compare the association of three publicly available national indices of social deprivation with prolonged LOS in revision TJA patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 1,047 consecutive patients who underwent a revision TJA were included in this retrospective study. Patient demographics, comorbidities, and behavioral characteristics were extracted. Area deprivation index (ADI), social deprivation index (SDI), and social vulnerability index (SVI) were recorded for each patient, following which univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to determine the relationship between deprivation measures and prolonged LOS (greater than five days postoperatively). RESULTS: 193 patients had a prolonged LOS following surgery. Categorical ADI was significantly associated with prolonged LOS following surgery (OR = 2.14; 95% CI = 1.30-3.54; p = 0.003). No association with LOS was found using SDI and SVI. When accounting for other covariates, only ASA scores (ORrange=3.43-3.45; p < 0.001) and age (ORrange=1.00-1.03; prange=0.025-0.049) were independently associated with prolonged LOS. CONCLUSION: The varying relationship observed between the length of stay and socioeconomic markers in this study indicates that the selection of a deprivation index could significantly impact the outcomes when investigating the association between socioeconomic deprivation and clinical outcomes. These results suggest that ADI is a potential metric of social determinants of health that is applicable both clinically and in future policies related to hospital stays including bundled payment plan following revision TJA.

Primary Total Knee and Total Hip Arthroplasty in the Rural Patient.

Rural patients have poorer health indicators, including higher risk of developing osteoarthritis. The objective of this study is to compare rural patients undergoing primary total joint arthroplasty (TJA) at rural hospitals with those undergoing primary TJA at urban hospitals with regards to demographics, comorbidities, and complications and to determine the preferred location of care for rural patients. Data from the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project National Inpatient Sample between 2016 and 2018 were analyzed. Demographics, comorbidities, inpatient complications, hospital length of stay, inpatient mortality, and discharge disposition were compared between rural patients who underwent TJA at rural hospitals and urban hospitals. Rural patients undergoing primary TJA in rural hospitals were more likely to be women, to be treated in the South, to have Medicaid payer status, to have dementia, diabetes mellitus, lung disease, and postoperative pulmonary complications, and to have a longer hospital length of stay. Those patients were also less likely to have baseline obesity, heart disease, kidney disease, liver disease, cancer, postoperative infection, and cardiovascular complications, and were less likely to be discharged home. Rural patients undergoing primary TJA tend to pursue surgery in their rural hospital when their comorbidity profile is manageable. These patients get their surgery performed in an urban setting when they have the means for travel and cost, and when their comorbidity profile is more complicated, requiring more specialized care, Rural patients are choosing to undergo their primary TJA in urban hospitals as opposed to their local rural hospitals. (Journal of Surgical Orthopaedic Advances 33(2):061-067, 2024).

Posttraumatic Arthritis Is More Common in Patients Undergoing Total Knee Arthroplasty Before Age 50.

Primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in patients under 50 is becoming more common. The goal of this study was to identify the diagnoses and predisposing factors for TKA prior to age 50. The Military Data Repository was queried for patients undergoing TKA prior to age 50. The cohort was matched to older patients. A total of 1,504 patients underwent manual record review for demographics, prior knee surgery, and indication for TKA. Primary osteoarthritis was the most common indication in both cohorts. Posttraumatic osteoarthritis was more common in patients who underwent TKA before age 50 (28%) compared with patients 50 and older (7%; p < 0.001). Patients who underwent TKA before age 50 were more likely to have previous anterior cruciate ligament injury, or any previous ipsilateral knee surgery (p < 0.001). These data suggest an association between prior knee injury and age at time of TKA. (Journal of Surgical Orthopaedic Advances 33(2):072-076, 2024).

Factors Affecting Operating Room Scheduling Accuracy for Primary and Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Retrospective Study.

BACKGROUND: Optimizing operating room (OR) scheduling accuracy is important for improving OR efficiency and maximizing value of total knee arthroplasty (TKA). However, data on factors that may impact TKA OR scheduling accuracy are limited. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective review of 7655 knee arthroplasties (6999 primary TKAs and 656 revision TKAs) performed between January 2020 and May 2023 was conducted. Patient baseline characteristics, surgeon experience (years in practice), as well as actual vs scheduled OR times were collected. Actual OR times that were at least 15% shorter or longer than scheduled OR times were considered to be clinically important. Logistic regression analyses were employed to assess the influence of specific patient and surgeon factors on OR scheduling inaccuracies. RESULTS: Using adjusted odds ratio, patients with primary TKA who had a lower body mass index (P<.001) were independently associated with overestimation of scheduled surgical time. Conversely, younger age (P<.001), afternoon procedure start time (P<.001), surgeons with less than 10 years of experience (P=.037), and higher patient body mass index (P<.001) were associated with underestimation of scheduled surgical time. For revision TKA, female sex (P=.021) and morning procedure start time (P=.038) were associated with overestimation of scheduled surgical time, while surgeons with less than 10 years of experience (P=.014) and patients who underwent spinal/epidural/block anesthesia (P=.038) were associated with underestimation of scheduled surgical time. CONCLUSION: This study highlights patient, surgeon, and intraoperative variables that impact the accuracy of scheduling for TKA procedures. Health systems should take these variables into consideration when creating OR schedules to fully optimize resources and available space. [Orthopedics. 2024;47(5):313-319.].

Discordance in Published 30-Day Readmission Rates Following Primary Total Hip and Total Knee Arthroplasty: Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) Versus the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP).

Background: 30-day readmission is an important quality metric evaluated following primary total joint arthroplasty (TJA) that has implications for hospital performance and reimbursement. Differences in how 30-day readmissions are defined between Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) and other quality improvement programs (i.e., National Surgical Quality Improvement Program [NSQIP]) may create discordance in published 30-day readmission rates. The purpose of this study was to evaluate 30-day readmission rates following primary TJA using two different temporal definitions. Methods: Patients undergoing primary total hip and primary total knee arthroplasty at a single academic institution from 2015-2020 were identified via common procedural terminology (CPT) codes in the electronic medical record (EMR) and institutional NSQIP data. Readmissions that occurred within 30 days of surgery (consistent with definition of 30-day readmission in NSQIP) and readmissions that occurred within 30 days of hospital discharge (consistent with definition of 30-day readmission from CMS) were identified. Rates of 30-day readmission and the prevalence of readmission during immortal time were calculated. Results: In total, 4,202 primary TJA were included. The mean hospital length of stay (LOS) was 1.79 days. 91% of patients were discharged to home. 30-day readmission rate using the CMS definition was 3.1% (130/4,202). 30-day readmission rate using the NSQIP definition was 2.7% (113/4,202). Eight readmissions captured by the CMS definition (6.1%) occurred during immortal time. Conclusion: Differences in temporal definitions of 30-day readmission following primary TJA between CMS and NSQIP results in discordant rates of 30-day readmission. Level of Evidence: III.

Fixation or Revision for Periprosthetic Fractures: Epidemiology, New Trends, and Projections in the United States.

BACKGROUND: Periprosthetic fractures can be devastating complications after total joint arthroplasty (TJA). The management of periprosthetic fractures is complex, spanning expertise in arthroplasty and trauma. The purpose of this study was to examine and project trends in the operative treatment of periprosthetic fractures in the United States. METHODS: A large, public and private payer database was queried to capture all International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision (ICD-10) diagnosis codes for periprosthetic femoral and tibial fractures. Statistical models were created to assess trends in treatment for periprosthetic fractures and to predict future surgical rates. An alpha value of 0.05 was used to assess significance. A Bonferroni correction was applied where applicable to account for multiple comparisons. RESULTS: In this study, from 2016 to 2021, 121,298 patients underwent surgical treatment for periprosthetic fractures. There was a significant increase in the total number of periprosthetic fractures. The incidence of periprosthetic hip fractures rose by 38% and that for periprosthetic knee fractures rose by 73%. The number of periprosthetic fractures is predicted to rise 212% from 2016 to 2032. There was a relative increase in open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) compared with revision arthroplasty for both periprosthetic hip fractures and periprosthetic knee fractures. CONCLUSIONS: Periprosthetic fractures are anticipated to impose a substantial health-care burden in the coming decades. Periprosthetic knee fractures are predominantly treated with ORIF rather than revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA), whereas periprosthetic hip fractures are predominantly treated with revision total hip arthroplasty (THA) rather than ORIF. Both periprosthetic knee fractures and periprosthetic hip fractures demonstrated increasing trends in this study. The proportion of periprosthetic hip fractures treated with ORIF relative to revision THA has been increasing. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Private sector expansion and the widening NHS treatment gap between rich and poor in England: Admissions for NHS-funded elective primary hip and knee replacements between 1997/98 and 2018/19.

Parliament has imposed duties on the government and NHS in England aimed at reducing health inequalities. AIM: to understand the effect on inequalities of government policies, which require the NHS in England to outsource elective surgery to the private sector. We analysed the numbers of admissions for hip and knee replacement surgery from the least and most deprived population quintiles in three time periods: before the introduction of the policies (1997/98-2002/03); following the implementation of the independent sector treatment centre programme (2003/04-2006/07); and after the extension of 'choice at referral' (2007/08-2018/19). RESULTS: despite admission rates doubling and trebling for hip and knee replacements, respectively, between 1997/98 and 2018/19, inequality grew to the detriment of the most deprived. Inequality grew at the fastest rate during period 3; admission rates to the NHS fell while admissions to the private sector continued to rise. By 2018/19 almost a third of NHS funded procedures were provided privately. In 1997/98, for every 10 patients admitted for hip and knee surgery from the most deprived quintile, 13 and 9, respectively were admitted from the least deprived, by 2018/19 the gap had widened to 19 and 15, respectively. Socio-economic inequalities for hip and knee replacement have widened as outsourcing of NHS treatment to the private sector has increased. The NHS must rebuild in-house capacity and provision instead of outsourcing care.

Disparities in Total Knee and Total Hip Arthroplasty Rates in the Population of Alaska, 2015 to 2018.

OBJECTIVE: Racial and ethnic disparities in total joint replacements have been documented. Our objective was to determine the rates of total joint replacements for Alaska Native/American Indian (AN/AI) individuals compared with non-AN/AI individuals in Alaska and investigate the differences in characteristics and outcomes by race. METHODS: We used hospital discharge data from the Alaska Health Facilities Data Reporting Program from 2015 to 2018. We identified people with an inpatient primary or revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA) or total hip arthroplasty (THA). We determined the population proportion of each procedure, age-adjusted rates by race, age-specific rates, and multivariable adjusted rate ratios for TKA or THA. We compared the characteristics of people undergoing primary TKA and THA by race. RESULTS: In 2,195,806 person-years, there were 8,131 arthroplasty procedures (4,594 primary TKAs, 2,791 primary THAs, 378 revision TKAs, and 368 revision THAs). Primary TKAs and THAs were less likely in people of AN/AI or "Other" race compared with people of White race, with some heterogeneity in the "Other" race category. In multivariable models, the adjusted rate ratio for AN/AI compared with White race for TKA was 0.70 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.60-0.82) and for THA was 0.69 (95% CI 0.55-0.85). AN/AI individuals undergoing TKA and THA were more likely to reside in rural locations, be younger than 65 years, have longer hospital stay, and discharge to home. CONCLUSION: This study confirmed the existence of racial disparities in TKA and THA in Alaska. There may be many underlying causes, and future research should focus on improving access to care.

Beyond Discharge Disposition: A Scoping Review on Sociodemographic Disparities in Rehabilitation Use After Hip and Knee Arthroplasty.

OBJECTIVE: The aims of this scoping review were to summarize the evidence regarding sex, racial, ethnic, geographic, and socioeconomic disparities in post-acute rehabilitation following total hip arthroplasty (THA) and knee arthroplasty (TKA). METHODS: Literature searches were conducted in Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, Web of Science, and PEDro. Studies were included if they were original research articles published 1993 or later; used data from the US; included patients after THA and/or TKA; presented results according to relevant sociodemographic variables, including sex, race, ethnicity, geography, or socioeconomic status; and studied the utilization of post-acute rehabilitation as an outcome. RESULTS: Twelve studies met the inclusion criteria. Five examined disparities in inpatient rehabilitation and found that Black patients and women experience longer lengths of stay after arthroplasty, and women are less likely than men to be discharged home after inpatient THA rehabilitation. Four studies examined data from skilled nursing facilities and found that insurance type and dual eligibility impact length of stay and rates of community discharge but found conflicting results regarding racial disparities in skilled nursing facility utilization after TKA. Five studies examined home health data and noted that rural agencies provide less care after TKA. Results regarding racial disparities in home health utilization after arthroplasty were conflicting. Six studies of outpatient rehabilitation noted geographic differences in timing of outpatient rehabilitation but mixed results regarding race differences in outpatient rehabilitation. CONCLUSION: Current evidence indicates that sex, race, ethnicity, geography, and socioeconomic status are associated with disparities in postacute rehabilitation use after arthroplasty. IMPACT: Rehabilitation providers across the postacute continuum should be aware of disparities in the population of patients after arthroplasty and regularly assess social determinants of health and other factors that may contribute to disparities. Customized care plans should ensure optimal timing and amount of rehabilitation is provided, and advocate for patients who need additional care to achieve the desired functional outcome.