Implementation research on registering cancer cases in primary health centres of Puducherry through community health workers.

Background & objectives Hospital-based cancer registry does not represent the true burden of cancer in the community. Initiating a Primary Health Centre (PHC)-based cancer registry may better estimate population-level data for cancer cases in an area. This study aimed to set up a system for facilitating a PHC-based cancer registry and to assess the registration status of cancer cases in various PHCs of Puducherry. The facilitating and limiting factors while setting up this registry were also assessed. Methods A quasi-experimental study with an embedded mixed-method design was conducted in 31 PHCs/Community Health Centres (CHCs) from March 2021 to November 2022. The interventions were implemented in all PHCs/CHCs of Puducherry with the involvement of the State Non-Communicable Diseases (NCD) cell. The line list of cancer cases from the Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education & Research (JIPMER) Hospital-based cancer registry was shared with all PHCs/CHCs. Sensitization sessions for all Community Health Workers (CHWs) were conducted, and feedback on cancer registration status was given to the State NCD cell. Focus group discussion (FGD)/Key informant interview (KII) was undertaken to understand strengths, challenges, and suggestions. The logic model was used to understand the various indicators while setting up this PHC-based cancer registry. Results Over a one-year intervention period, 1270 cancer cases were registered at Puducherry's PHCs/CHCs, 1203 (88%) from the shared list and 67(5%) from other facilities. However, only 53 per cent of the expected living cases were captured in the various PHCs. Major limitations for registration were the COVID-19 pandemic, stigma, inadequate manpower, infrastructure issues, and privacy concerns during screening. Interpretation & conclusions It was feasible to set up a PHC-based cancer registry in all PHCs of Puducherry. However, registration of cancer cases was suboptimal, as population-based screening of cancer cases, as recommended in the National Programme for Prevention & Control of Non-Communicable Diseases (NP-NCD) programme, was weak due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Once this is strengthened, the PHC-based cancer registry will better represent the population.

Health Care Delivery Site- and Patient-Level Factors Associated With COVID-19 Primary Vaccine Series Completion in a National Network of Community Health Centers.

Objectives. To assess multilevel factors associated with variation in COVID-19 vaccination rates in a US network of community health centers. Methods. Using multilevel logistic regression with electronic health record data from ADVANCE (Accelerating Data Value Across a National Community Health Center Network; January 1, 2022-December 31, 2022), we assessed associations between health care delivery site-level (n = 1219) and patient-level (n = 1 864 007) characteristics and COVID-19 primary vaccine series uptake. Results. A total of 1 337 440 patients completed the COVID-19 primary vaccine series. Health care delivery site characteristics were significantly associated with lower series completion rates, including being located in non-Medicaid expansion states and isolated or rural communities and serving fewer patients. Patient characteristics associated with significantly lower likelihood of completing the vaccine series included being Black/African American or American Indian/Alaska Native (vs White), younger age, lower income, being uninsured or publicly insured (vs using private insurance), and having fewer visits. Conclusions. Both health care delivery site- and patient-level factors were significantly associated with lower COVID-19 vaccine uptake. Community health centers have been a critical resource for vaccination during the pandemic. (Am J Public Health. 2024;114(11):1242-1251. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2024.307773).

Social Deprivation and Multimorbidity Among Community-Based Health Center Patients in the United States.

Introduction: Multimorbidity - having 2 or more chronic diseases - is a national public health concern that entails burdensome and costly care for patients, their families, and public health programs. Adults residing in socially deprived areas often have limited access to social and material resources. They also experience a greater multimorbidity burden. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort analysis of electronic health record (EHR) data from 678 community-based health centers (CHCs) in 27 states from the Accelerating Data Value Across a National Community Health Center (ADVANCE) Network, a clinical research network, from 2012-2019. We used mixed-effects Poisson regression to examine the relationship of area-level social deprivation (eg, educational attainment, household income, unemployment) to chronic disease accumulation among a sample of patients aged 45 years or older (N = 816,921) residing across 9,362 zip code tabulation areas and receiving care in safety-net health organizations. Results: We observed high rates of chronic disease among this national sample. Prevalence of multimorbidity varied considerably by geographic location, both within and between states. People in more socially deprived areas with Social Deprivation Index (SDI) scores in quartiles 2, 3, and 4 had greater initial chronic disease counts - 17.1%, 17.7%, and 18.0%, respectively - but a slower rate of accumulation compared with people in the least-deprived quartile. Our findings were consistent for models of the composite SDI and those evaluating disaggregated measures of area-level educational attainment, household income, and unemployment. Conclusion: Social factors play an important role in the development and progression of multimorbidity, which suggests that an assessment and understanding of area-level social deprivation is necessary for developing public health strategies to address multimorbidity.

Minding the gap: Assessing patient expectations versus experiences in drug information services at community health centers (Puskesmas) in Indonesia urban settings.

In pharmaceutical care, patients' perceptions of drug information provided by pharmacists are vital for assessing pharmaceutical services at community health centers (in Indonesian known as Puskesmas). The aim of this study was to determine the alignment between patients' expectations and experiences of drug information services by pharmacists at Puskesmas in Indonesia. This multicenter cross-sectional study utilized a validated questionnaire among outpatient patients aged 18 years and above across all 47 Puskesmas in Makassar, Indonesia. A total of 622 respondents were interviewed between September to December 2023. Significant gaps were observed between patients' expectations and experiences regarding all the drug information aspects such as quantity (median: 4 vs 3, p<0.001), drug effects (median: 4 vs 3, p<0.001), dosage form (median: 3 vs 3, p<0.001), proper administration (median: 4 vs 4, p<0.001), side effects (median: 4 vs 2, p<0.001), storage (median: 3 vs 2, p<0.001), drug-drug interactions (median: 4 vs 2, p<0.001), drug-food interactions (median: 4 vs 2, p<0.001), handling missed dose (median: 3 vs 2, p<0.001), managing accidental overdoses (median: 4 vs 2, p<0.001), history of drug use (median: 3 vs 2, p<0.001), co-medications (median: 3 vs 2, p<0.001), and previous drug allergies (median: 3 vs 2, p<0.001). Sociodemographic factors influencing patients' need for drug information services encompass age, sex, educational attainment, comorbidities, family size, number of visits, monthly income, and occupation. The quality of drug information services at Puskesmas in Indonesia still requires optimization and customization to meet the specific needs of patients, taking into account their sociodemographic characteristics.

Disparities in COVID-19 vaccination receipt by race, ethnicity, and social determinants of health among a large patient population in a network of community-based healthcare centers.

BACKGROUND: There are known disparities in U.S. COVID-19 vaccination but there is limited information on national vaccine uptake in a large, racially diverse, all-age population. Here, we describe COVID-19 vaccination coverage in a large U.S. population accessing care in OCHIN (not an acronym), a national network of community-based healthcare organizations. METHODS: Within OCHIN, we identified patients aged 6 months and older with ≥1 completed clinical encounter since becoming age-eligible for the COVID-19 vaccine between December 13, 2020 and December 31, 2022. Patients' COVID-19 vaccination status was assessed from OCHIN's Epic® electronic health record which includes data from state immunization information systems. Patients were considered vaccinated if they received ≥1 dose of a monovalent vaccine product; coverage was categorized by age groups (6 months-4 years; 5-11 years, 12-15 years, 16+ years). Multivariate analyses assessed factors associated with COVID-19 vaccination across age groups. RESULTS: The cohort included 3.3 million Hispanic (37 %), non-Hispanic (NH) White (31 %), NH Black (15 %), and NH Asian (7 %) patients; 45 % of whom were Medicaid-enrolled, 19 % uninsured, and 53 % with a household income below 100 % of the federal poverty level. The proportion with ≥1 COVID-19 vaccine dose increased with age, from 11.7 % (6 months through 4 years) to 72.3 % (65 years and older). The only factors associated with significantly higher COVID-19 vaccine coverage across age groups were prior receipt of an influenza vaccine and having private insurance. In adjusted modeling, when compared to NH whites, COVID-19 vaccine coverage was significantly higher among Hispanic, NH Asian, and NH multiple-race patients aged ≥5 years and significantly lower among NH Black and NH Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander patients aged 6 months-4 years old. CONCLUSIONS: We identified disparities in primary series COVID-19 vaccine coverage by age, race and ethnicity, household income, insurance status, and prior influenza vaccination within this large, diverse population accessing care in community-based healthcare organizations.

implementation of healthy heart ambassador to improve blood pressure control at community health centers in Texas.

BACKGROUND: Hypertension is one of the most prevalent chronic diseases in the United States and can increase a person's risk of stroke and other cardiovascular complications. Yet only 1 in 4 people with high blood pressure in the United States have their blood pressure managed. To improve hypertension control, we supported 9 health centers in Texas with the implementation of the Healthy Heart Ambassador Blood Pressure Self-Monitoring (HHA) Program. METHODS: We provided health center training using the HHA Program Facilitation Training Guide, recorded barriers to implementing the HHA program, and employed strategies to overcome those barriers. RESULTS: There were 68 staff members from the health centers trained to deliver the HHA program. Three health centers successfully implemented all three major components of HHA, three were able to implement two components, two adopted two components, and one withdrew due to insufficient capacity. Capability, technology infrastructure, and motivation were among the barriers most referenced. CONCLUSION: Clinic non-physician team members delivering the HHA program will need training and ongoing technical assistance to overcome implementation barriers.

Development of a Referral Pathway to Address Health-Harming Legal Needs at a Federally Qualified Health Center.

BACKGROUND: Health-harming legal needs are legal burdens that negatively affect a person's overall health. Medical-legal partnerships (MLPs) are a cost-effective way for health care systems to improve overall health and access to health care and empower health care providers to become more active in addressing health-harming legal needs and social determinants of health. This article describes the implementation of a referral pathway to an MLP in a nurse-managed community health center. This pathway was used by the health center's clinical team to help connect patients who had burdensome legal needs with legal professionals who could further help evaluate those needs. METHODS: An MLP team developed a referral pathway in which all adult patients were asked to complete a legal screening tool to assess whether they had legal needs that could be addressed by an MLP's intervention. If a legal need was identified, the patient would meet with the community health worker for further assessment. The community health worker would then present these cases for further review to the MLP team. The Plan-Do-Study-Act approach was used to make improvements to the pathway throughout the initiative. RESULTS: The referral pathway was used in 70.8% of patient visits in the first seven weeks of implementation, with 209 legal screenings completed. Of those, 38 patients (18.2%) reported a legal need, 12 of whom (31.6%) were referred to the MLP. CONCLUSIONS: The referral pathway is a useful means of determining legal needs while also screening for social determinants of health. This process allows health care teams to address both health-harming legal needs and social determinants of health in a community health center.

"An Act of Complete Care": Provider Perspectives on Linking Maternal Contraceptive Care With Well-Baby Visits in Community Health Centers.

BACKGROUND: Short inter-pregnancy interval (IPI) is associated with adverse health outcomes for women and infants, and low-income women experience disproportionate rates of short IPI. An essential solution is providing postpartum (PP) women with timely contraceptive care. However, patient-centered approaches for facilitating care access are needed. OBJECTIVE: To explore Community Health Center (CHC) staff and provider perspectives on the implementation of a clinical trial offering co-scheduled well-infant/maternal contraceptive care for women with infants 0 to 6 months at the Well-Baby Visit (WBV). METHOD: Eighteen participants (providers, staff, and administrators) representing 7 diverse CHC sites in 2 U.S. states completed semi-structured telephone interviews. Audio-recordings were transcribed and analyzed using hybrid thematic analysis. RESULTS: Offering co-scheduled visits was perceived as beneficial for facilitating timely PP contraception, convenient care access, and encouraging family planning considerations during the PP period. However, provider and staff discomfort with initiating family planning and contraceptive care conversations at the WBV emerged as a salient barrier. CONCLUSION: Paired approaches to well-infant/maternal contraceptive care may promote increased access to timely contraception for PP women, possibly reducing unintended short IPI. Comprehensive training, ongoing support, and patient-centered implementation strategies tailored to context and developed with care team input are needed to ensure competency and comfortability with facilitating contraceptive care conversations at the WBV.

Health resource allocation within the close-knit medical consortium after the Luohu healthcare reform in China: efficiency, productivity, and influencing factors.

Objective: This study aims to assess the efficiency and productivity of the Luohu Hospital Group after the reform and to identify factors influencing the efficiency to support the future development of medical consortia. Methods: Data on health resources from Shenzhen and the Luohu Hospital Group for the years 2015 to 2021 were analyzed using the super-efficiency slack-based measure data envelopment analysis (SE-SBM-DEA) model, Malmquist productivity index (MPI), and Tobit regression to evaluate changes in efficiency and productivity and to identify determinants of efficiency post-reform. Results: After the reform, the efficiency of health resource allocation within the Luohu Hospital Group improved by 33.87%. Community health centers (CHCs) within the group had an average efficiency score of 1.046. Moreover, the Luohu Hospital Group's average total factor productivity change (TFPCH) increased by 2.5%, primarily due to gains in technical efficiency change (EFFCH), which offset declines in technical progress change (TECHCH). The efficiency scores of CHCs were notably affected by the ratio of general practitioners (GPs) to health technicians and the availability of home hospital beds. Conclusion: The reform in the Luohu healthcare system has shown preliminary success, but continuous monitoring is necessary. Future strategies should focus on strengthening technological innovation, training GPs, and implementing the home hospital bed policy. These efforts will optimize the efficiency of health resource allocation and support the integration and development of resources within the medical consortium.

Patient and provider attitudes regarding sudden unexpected death in epilepsy disclosure at a low-resource, minority community health center.

BACKGROUND: Sudden Unexpected Death in Epilepsy (SUDEP) is a complication of epilepsy responsible for approximately 1 death per 1000 patients. The literature has demonstrated minimal SUDEP disclosure between providers and patients, although patients have consistently reported desire to know about their risk. However, the majority of these studies has been conducted in Caucasian populations which did not seek to include lower socio-economic class individuals. Thus, the purpose of this study is to determine patient and provider attitudes regarding SUDEP disclosure at a community health center serving minority, predominantly Hispanic, patients. METHODS: This cross-sectional study utilized surveys distributed to patients with epilepsy (n = 20), patients with diabetes (n = 20), those with no chronic disease (n = 20) and providers (n = 13). Online surveys were distributed to 13 providers whereas phone surveys were conducted for patients with epilepsy. In-person surveys were distributed to patients with diabetes and no chronic disease to serve as comparison groups. Surveys were available in both Spanish and English. Patient surveys consisted of demographic information and questions evaluating their current knowledge and preferences regarding disclosure of a potentially fatal disorder. RESULTS: Twenty patients with epilepsy, 20 patients with diabetes, 20 patients without chronic diseases, and 9 providers responded to the online or in-person surveys. Of the patients with epilepsy, 90 % (n = 18/20) were Hispanic which was not significantly different from the comparison groups. 45 % (n = 9/20) believed they had a higher rate of death due to epilepsy with only 3 patients having heard of SUDEP prior to the survey, and only 1 learning this from a physician. All patients wanted to know everything there was to know regarding their condition, including a higher risk of unexpected death. Most patients (85%, n = 17/20) believe everyone with epilepsy should be informed of SUDEP and this information should come from their provider (90 %, n = 18/20). Results were similar for both comparison groups, except patients with diabetes unanimously desired to know about a theoretical risk of death at the time of diagnosis. Of the providers, 66.7% (n = 6/9) never discuss SUDEP, with the remaining 33.3% (n = 3/9) discussing SUDEP rarely. The primary reason for not discussing SUDEP was not knowing enough about it (66.7%, n = 5/9). CONCLUSION: Almost all patients with epilepsy had no knowledge of SUDEP, yet desired to know this information within the first two visits. Providers in the primary care setting rarely discuss SUDEP, most often due to lack of knowledge. These results are very similar to those found in mainly white, higher socioeconomic populations and indicate that race should not be a barrier to SUDEP disclosure.

Barriers and proposed solutions to at-home colorectal cancer screening tests in medically underserved health centers across three US regions to inform a randomized trial.

INTRODUCTION: At-home colorectal cancer (CRC) screening is an effective way to reduce CRC mortality, but screening rates in medically underserved groups are low. To plan the implementation of a pragmatic randomized trial comparing two population-based outreach approaches, we conducted qualitative research on current processes and barriers to at-home CRC screening in 10 community health centers (CHCs) that serve medically underserved groups, four each in Massachusetts and California, and two tribal facilities in South Dakota. METHODS: We conducted 53 semi-structured interviews with clinical and administrative staff at the participating CHCs. Participants were asked about CRC screening processes, categorized into eight domains: patient identification, outreach, risk assessment, fecal immunochemical test (FIT) workflows, FIT-DNA (i.e., Cologuard) workflows, referral for a follow-up colonoscopy, patient navigation, and educational materials. Transcripts were analyzed using a Rapid Qualitative Analysis approach. A matrix was used to organize and summarize the data into four sub-themes: current process, barriers, facilitators, and solutions to adapt materials for the intervention. RESULTS: Each site's process for stool-based CRC screening varied slightly. Interviewees identified the importance of offering educational materials in English and Spanish, using text messages to remind patients to return kits, adapting materials to address health literacy needs so patients can access instructions in writing, pictures, or video, creating mailed workflows integrated with a tracking system, and offering patient navigation to colonoscopy for patients with an abnormal result. CONCLUSION: Proposed solutions across the three regions will inform a multilevel intervention in a pragmatic trial to increase CRC screening uptake in CHCs.

Quality of care provided to patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus in Tshwane, South Africa.

BACKGROUND:  Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2D) is a public health challenge, affecting 90% of all patients with diabetes, globally. Compliance to treatment guidelines among healthcare professionals (HCPs) is low, thus resulting in inadequate quality of patient care and poor health outcomes among patients. AIM:  To examine the availability of equipment, guidelines, screening and education offered to patients with T2D and compare between clinics and community health centres (CHCs). SETTING:  Tshwane Metropolitan Municipality, Gauteng Province, South Africa. METHODS:  A cross-sectional descriptive study utilised a self-administered questionnaire to collect data from nurses and doctors responsible for treating patients with T2D, from May to June 2022. About 250 eligible HCPs were recruited during routine morning meetings in 22 clinics and six CHCs. RESULTS:  More than 80% of HCPs reported having basic equipment except for ophthalmoscopes, Snellen charts (67%), tuning forks (64%), electrocardiograms (ECG) (46%) and monofilaments (12%). SEMDSA guidelines were reported by 16% of the participants, Diabetic Foot Care Guidelines were reported by 54% and Dietary Guidelines for Diabetic Patients by 55%. Furthermore, 91%, 71% and 69% of HCPs reported that ECG, microalbumin-creatinine and foot examinations were not always performed, respectively. About 66% and 17% always offered individual educational and group sessions, respectively. CONCLUSION:  Equipment availability and compliance with treatment guidelines, patient education and screening of chronic complications are inadequate.Contribution: The study highlights the poor adherence to treatment guidelines and inadequate equipment in health facilities. These shortcomings could lead to missed opportunities for early diagnosis of complications and ultimately poorer patient outcomes.

Community Health Centers Uptake of Telemedicine During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Trends, Barriers, and Successful Strategies.

OBJECTIVE: To describe telemedicine use patterns and understand clinic's approaches to shifting care delivery during the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: We used electronic health record data from 203 community health centers across 13 states between 01/01/2019 and 6/31/2021 to describe trends in telemedicine visit rates over time. Qualitative data were collected from 13 of those community health centers to understand factors influencing adoption and implementation of telemedicine. RESULTS: Most clinics in our sample were in urban areas (n = 176) and served a majority of uninsured and publicly insured patients (12.8% and 44.4%, respectively) across racial and ethnic minority groups (16.6% Black and 29.3% Hispanic). During our analysis period there was a 791% increase in telemedicine visits from before the pandemic (.06% pre- vs 47.5% during). A latent class growth analysis was used to examine differences in patterns of adoption of telemedicine across the 203 CHCs. The model resulted in 6 clusters representing various levels of telemedicine adoption. A mixed methods approach streamlined these clusters into 4 final groups. Clinics that reported rapid adoption of telemedicine attributed this change to leadership prioritization of telemedicine, robust quality improvement processes (eg, using PDSA processes), and emphasis on training and technology support. CONCLUSIONS: In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, telemedicine adoption rates varied across clinics. Our study highlight that organizational factors contributed to the clinic's ability to rapidly uptake and use telemedicine services throughout the pandemic. These approaches could inform future non-pandemic practice change and care delivery.

Equity in practice: Integrating cross cultural health brokers for culturally safe primary care for immigrants and refugees in British Columbia.

Umbrella Multicultural Health Co-op is a community health centre serving cultural communities of immigrants/refugees in British Columbia. It uses Cross Cultural Health Brokers (CCHBs), multicultural workers bridging patients and the healthcare system, to better meet the primary care needs of immigrant/refugee populations. Through the Team Primary Care initiative, Umbrella Co-op: (1) added new CCHBs alongside allied health practitioners; and (2) implemented team workshops and evaluation for quality improvement. The learning health system framework guided project activities. Comprehensive, culturally responsive primary care for immigrants and refugees benefits from a team-based approach that includes the integration of CCHBs. Team development activities improved team function. Co-developing evaluation with the interprofessional team enabled meaningful participation. Health system design for equity-oriented team-based primary care for immigrants and refugees should include resources for CCHBs and team development infrastructure.

Community Collaboration to Advance Racial/Ethnic Equity in Colorectal Cancer Screening: Protocol for a Multilevel Intervention to Improve Screening and Follow-up in Community Health Centers.

INTRODUCTION: Colorectal cancer (CRC) screening utilization is low among low-income, uninsured, and minority populations that receive care in community health centers (CHCs). There is a need for evidence-based interventions to increase screening and follow-up care in these settings. METHODS: A multilevel, multi-component pragmatic cluster randomized controlled trial is being conducted at 8 CHCs in two metropolitan areas (Boston and Los Angeles), with two arms: (1) Mailed FIT outreach with text reminders, and (2) Mailed FIT-DNA with patient support. We also include an additional CHC in Rapid City (South Dakota) that follows a parallel protocol for FIT-DNA but is not randomized due to lack of a comparison group. Eligible individuals in participating clinics are primary care patients ages 45-75, at average-risk for CRC, and overdue for CRC screening. Participants with abnormal screening results are offered navigation for follow-up colonoscopy and CRC risk assessment. RESULTS: The primary outcome is the completion rate of CRC screening at 90 days. Secondary outcomes include the screening completion rate at 180 days and the rate of colonoscopy completion within 6 months among participants with an abnormal result. Additional goals are to enhance our understanding of facilitators and barriers to CRC risk assessment in CHC settings. CONCLUSIONS: This study assesses the effectiveness of two multilevel interventions to increase screening participation and follow-up after abnormal screening in under-resourced clinical settings, informing future efforts to address CRC disparities. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT05714644.

Building Capacity of Community Health Centers to Improve the Provision of Postpartum Care Services Through Data-Driven Health Information Technology and Innovation.

Maternal morbidity and mortality remain significant challenges in the United States, with substantial burden during the postpartum period. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, in partnership with the National Association of Community Health Centers, began an initiative to build capacity in Federally Qualified Health Centers to (1) improve the infrastructure for perinatal care measures and (2) use perinatal care measures to identify and address gaps in postpartum care. Two partner health center-controlled networks implemented strategies to integrate evidence-based recommendations into the clinic workflow and used data-driven health information technology (HIT) systems to improve data standardization for quality improvement of postpartum care services. Ten measures were created to capture recommended care and services. To support measure capture, a data cleaning algorithm was created to prioritize defining pregnancy episodes and delivery dates and address data inconsistencies. Quality improvement activities targeted postpartum care delivery tailored to patients and care teams. Data limitations, including inconsistencies in electronic health record documentation and data extraction practices, underscored the complexity of integrating HIT solutions into postpartum care workflows. Despite challenges, the project demonstrated continuous quality improvement to support data quality for perinatal care measures. Future solutions emphasize the need for standardized data elements, collaborative care team engagement, and iterative HIT implementation strategies to enhance perinatal care quality. Our findings highlight the potential of HIT-driven interventions to improve postpartum care within health centers, with a focus on the importance of addressing data interoperability and documentation challenges to optimize and monitor initiatives to improve postpartum health outcomes.

Current Practices and Attitudes of Community Health Centers Toward the Use of Algorithmic Logic to Identify Patients with Undiagnosed Hypertension.

Treating patients with uncontrolled hypertension is a powerful intervention for reducing the risk of heart attack and stroke. Leveraging health information technology to identify patients with undiagnosed hypertension using algorithmic logic can be an effective approach for reaching hypertensive patients who may otherwise be overlooked. Despite evidence that this strategy can support favorable cardiovascular health outcomes in the safety-net healthcare setting, little is known about its implementation outside of targeted practice and research environments. In 2021-2022, Community Clinic Association of Los Angeles County and the Los Angeles County Department of Public Health collaborated on a mixed methods, organizational assessment of community health centers to better understand their practices and attitudes toward the use of algorithmic logic to identify patients with undiagnosed hypertension. Results from the assessment suggest that awareness and use of this approach are limited; numerous challenges are associated with its adoption and implementation.

Cost-effectiveness of hospital-based treatment compared with community treatment centres: an analysis of Korea National Health Insurance claims data.

OBJECTIVES: We compared the cost-effectiveness of hospital-based treatment and that of community treatment centres (CTCs). DESIGN: We performed statistical analysis to compare the expenses incurred by COVID-19 patients who received hospital care with those incurred by COVID-19 patients who went to CTCs. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: A study was conducted on 411 530 COVID-19 inpatients and 243 329 CTC patients from January 2020 to December 2021. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: We calculated the probability of severe disease, hospitalisation period and medical expenses for inpatients and CTC patients. Subsequently, we analysed the cost-effectiveness of CTC compared with hospitalisation. RESULTS: Comparing medical expenses, CTC patients incurred 2 220 000 KRW on average, which is less than the expenses incurred by hospitalised COVID-19 patients. CONCLUSIONS: The study suggests that using a CTC may be more cost-effective than a hospital service alone.